Skip to main content
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica logoLink to Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica
. 2022 Dec 31;42(6):525–530. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N1917

Long-term impact of smoking cessation on new glottic cancer events in patients with early glottic cancer

Effetti a lungo termine dell’abolizione del fumo di sigaretta sull’insorgenza di nuovi eventi oncologici laringei, in pazienti trattati per tumori glottici in stadio iniziale

Min-Su Kim 1, Hong-Gyun Wu 2, Myung-Whun Sung 3, Tack-Kyun Kwon 3,
PMCID: PMC9853108  PMID: 36654518

SUMMARY

Objective

Patients with early glottic cancer sometimes exhibit new glottic cancer events after 5 years. This study aimed to analyse the patterns and risk factors of new glottic cancer events in patients with early glottic cancer 5 years after initial treatment.

Methods

In total, 209 patients were included in this study. Age, sex, T stage, anterior commissure involvement, smoking pattern and treatment modality were retrospectively analysed.

Results

The median follow-up was 91 (range, 60-266) months. The median time for the occurrence of new glottic cancer events was 97 (range, 61-199) months. New glottic cancer events occurred 5 years after initial treatment in 16 (7.6%) patients, among whom 12 (75.0%) had new glottic cancer event lesions overlapping with initial lesions. Smoking cessation after treatment was significantly correlated with fewer new glottic cancer events after 5 years.

Conclusions

New glottic cancer events occurring 5 years after initial treatment in patients with early glottic cancer are not negligible. In particular, if smoking is continued after treatment, these patients can experience new glottic cancer events even after 5 years.

KEY WORDS: laryngeal neoplasms, glottis, recurrence, smoking cessation

Introduction

Laryngeal cancer is one of the most common head and neck cancers. An estimated 13,560 new laryngeal cancer cases occurred in the United States in 2015, accounting for 3,640 deaths 1. Among laryngeal cancers, glottic cancer refers to a malignancy of the true vocal cords and is the most common laryngeal cancer. Stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T2N0M0) glottic cancers are typically grouped together as early glottic cancer and are mostly treated as a single entity 2. Standard treatments for early glottic cancer include transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and radiotherapy (RT), both resulting in favourable oncologic outcomes 3. The 5-year local control rates following TLM are reportedly 85-95% and 65-85% for patients with Stage I and II glottic cancers, respectively. Similarly, 5-year local control rates following RT are reportedly 85-95% and 60-80% for patients with Stage I and II glottic cancers, respectively 4. Local control failure occurs mostly within 5 years of initial treatment in patients with early glottic cancer, regardless of whether they have undergone RT or TLM 5-8. Therefore, clinical follow-up for these patients has been traditionally performed for 5 years after initial treatment.

Although most studies have examined 5-year local control rates 9-16, some new glottic cancer events have been observed after more than 5 years following initial treatment in patients with early glottic cancer without recurrence during the first 5 years. Some studies have examined such cases, but have only described the overall long-term rates and showed decreasing Kaplan-Meier curves without focusing on lesions occurring beyond 5 years after initial treatment 17-19. New cancer lesions occurring after 5 years are considered secondary primary cancers rather than recurrences. Therefore, studies on secondary primary cancers after glottic cancer usually include oral, pharyngeal, oesophageal and lung cancers 20,21. However, we have recently encountered new glottic cancer events around the initial glottic cancer lesions 5 years after the initial treatment of early glottic cancer. To the best of our knowledge, new glottic cancer events after 5 years of initial treatment in patients with early glottic cancer have not been sufficiently researched. Therefore, this study aimed to analyse the prognostic factors and patterns of new glottic cancer events at 5 years after initial treatment in patients with early glottic cancer without recurrence during the first 5 years.

Materials and methods

Patients

We included 330 patients diagnosed with early glottic cancer who had undergone single treatment modality (TLM or RT) at our hospital between January 1994 and May 2014. Of the 330 patients, 121 were excluded – 48 reported recurrences within 5 years after the initial treatment, 51 were lost to follow-up over 5 years after the initial treatment, and 22 received RT after TLM because of close resection margins. Finally, 209 patients with early glottic cancer without recurrence within 5 years were enrolled. Follow-up was regularly performed – 1 month after treatment completion, every 2 months in the first year and every 6 months for 5 years using laryngoscopy at every visit. Neck computed tomography was performed annually. Thereafter, follow-up was performed annually using only laryngoscopy at every visit. New glottic cancer events were recorded during follow-up visits.

Various clinical factors, including age, sex, T stage, anterior commissure involvement, smoking history and treatment modality, were analysed. The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual was used for staging 22. This manual defines T1 tumours as tumours confined to a unilateral vocal fold (T1a) or bilateral vocal folds (T1b) and T2 tumours as tumours extending to the supraglottis or subglottis with or without impaired vocal fold mobility. We also defined stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T2N0M0) glottic cancers as early glottic cancer.

Statistical analysis

The clinical data were summarised as means for continuous variables and numbers for categorical variables. Continuous variables were compared using independent t-test. Nominal and ordinal categorical variables were compared using chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, and linear-by-linear association. The cumulative probability of new glottic cancer events was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using log-rank test. Univariable analysis of new glottic cancer events was performed using Cox regression. For all analyses, P-values of < 0.05 were considered to indicate significance. SPSS software (ver. 22.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analyses.

Results

The following patient characteristics were analysed: age, sex, T stage, anterior commissure involvement, smoking history and treatment modality (Tab. I). The median follow-up period was 91 (range, 60-266) months. However, the follow-up periods were not sufficient for many patients (166/209, 79.4%) at the time of analysis. Of the 124 patients in the smoking cessation success group, 101 were not continuously followed. Among the 85 patients in the smoking cessation failure group, 65 were not continuously followed.

Table I.

General characteristics of participants (n = 209).

Variable Total (n = 209) New glottic cancer (-) New glottic cancer (+) P
(n = 193) (n = 16)
Age (mean ± SD, years) 60.51 ± 7.94 60.24 ± 8.03 62.88 ± 6.93 0.210
Sex
    Male 201 (96.2%) 185 (92.0%) 16 (8.0%) 1.000
    Female 8 (3.8%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
T stage 0.538
    T1a 93 (44.5%) 86 (92.5%) 7 (7.5%)
    T1b 73 (34.9%) 69 (94.5%) 4 (5.5%)
    T2 43 (20.6%) 38 (88.4%) 5 (11.6%)
AC involvement 0.089
    Yes 92 (38.9%) 88 (95.7%) 4 (4.3%)
    No 117 (61.1%) 105 (89.7%) 12 (10.3%)
Smoking cessation after treatment 0.003
    Success 124 (37.8%) 124 (100%) 0 (0.0%)
    Failure 85 (62.2%) 69 (81.2%) 16 (18.8%)
Treatment 0.670
    Transoral laser microsurgery 81 (38.8%) 74 (91.4%) 7 (8.6%)
    Radiotherapy 128 (61.2%) 119 (92.9%) 9 (7.1%)

*SD: standard deviation; AC: anterior commissure.

Of the 209 patients, 16 experienced new glottic cancer events at more than 5 years after the initial treatment. The 10-year disease-free survival rate was 90.7%. The median time for occurrence of new glottic cancer events was 97 (range, 61-199) months (Fig. 1). The disease-free survival rate was significantly higher in the smoking cessation success group after treatment than in the smoking cessation failure group (Fig. 2). Smoking cessation failure after treatment was significantly associated with the risk of new glottic cancer events at more than 5 years after initial treatment (Tab. II). No significant differences in second extra-glottic cancers [success, 4.1% (5/124) vs. failure, 8.2% (7/85); P = 0.19] or Charlson comorbidity index scores (success, 1.3 vs failure, 1.9; P = 0.31] were observed between the smoking cessation success and failure groups.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier curve of new glottic cancer events.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier curve of new glottic cancer events according to smoking cessation.

Table II.

Univariate Cox regression model for new glottic cancer events occurring after 5 years in patients with early glottic cancer.

Variable Univariate analysis
HR 95% CI P
Age (< 65 yr/ ≥ 65 yr) 2.39 0.88-6.49 0.187
Sex (male/female) 0.04 0.43-9.35 0.575
T stage (T1/T2) 1.47 0.50-4.24 0.477
AC involvement (yes/no) 1.96 0.63-6.09 0.245
Smoking cessation after treatment (success/failure) 4.31 1.58-7.53 0.047
Treatment (RT/TLM) 1.91 0.69-5.31 0.214

*HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; yr: years; AC: anterior commissure; RT: radiotherapy; TLM: transoral laser microsurgery.

Of the 16 patients with new glottic cancer events, 10 were diagnosed based on changes in voice and 6 were diagnosed via follow-up laryngoscopy without definite symptoms. If the glottic anatomic extent of the initial and new glottic lesions overlapped, the cases were considered to be overlapping, otherwise the cases were considered to be non-overlapping. Further, 12 (75.0%) overlapping cases and 4 (25.0%) non-overlapping cases of new glottic cancer were observed. Among the overlapping cases, 5 (41.7%) were previously treated with TLM and 7 (58.3%) were previously treated with RT. Among the non-overlapping cases, 2 each (50%) were previously treated with TLM and RT. No significant differences in overlapping lesions were observed between the TLM and RT groups (P = 0.77).

Discussion

Among the 209 patients included in this study, 16 experienced new glottic cancer events at 5 years after initial treatment for early glottic cancer without recurrence within the first 5 years. Moreover, the glottic anatomic extent of the initial and new glottic lesions overlapped in many cases. Smoking cessation failure after treatment was a significant risk factor related to new glottic cancer events occurring beyond 5 years.

Some studies have investigated new glottic cancer events beyond 5 years in patients with early glottic cancer; however, these studies have not specifically reported the number of new glottic cancer events occurring beyond 5 years. These studies have only described the overall long-term rate and showed decreasing Kaplan-Meier curves after 5 years during follow-up. Moreover, they have analysed patients with early glottic cancer treated with only TLM 17,18. Our data showed that treatment modality was not an independent predictor of new glottic cancer events occurring 5 years after the initial treatment. This result was similar to that of previous studies indicating that TLM and RT are equally effective for treatment of early glottic cancer 6,9. In contrast to previous studies 1,2,14,15,18,19, T stage and anterior commissure involvement were not found to be significant prognostic factors for new glottic cancer events occurring 5 years after the initial treatment in the present study. This difference may be attributed to our study design, which was aimed to reduce bias; we excluded patients with recurrence within 5 years after the initial treatment and patients without follow-up beyond 5 years after the initial treatment. Therefore, accurate comparisons between the results of this study and those of the previous studies may be difficult.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating that continued smoking is related to new glottic cancer events at more than 5 years after the initial treatment for early glottic cancer. Smoking is the main risk factor for head and neck cancer development. However, smoking cessation is a difficult process for patients with this disease. Chan et al. reported that 45% of patients with head and neck cancer continue to smoke after cancer diagnosis, and patients willing to quit smoking after disease onset often fail to do so 23. A systematic review revealed that smoking cessation in patients with head and neck cancer is associated with improved overall survival, recurrence rates and second primary tumours 24. However, it is somewhat surprising that patients who continue smoking develop new glottic cancer events even 5 years after the treatment of early glottic cancer, which usually shows relatively good prognosis. This suggests that even patients with early glottic cancer require continual education about smoking cessation during follow-up.

We believe that some new glottic cancer events may be secondary primary malignancies or late recurrences. The classic criteria for defining second primary malignancy proposed by Warren and Gates are as follows: 1) histological confirmation of malignancy in both the index and secondary tumours; 2) anatomical separation of the two malignancies by normal mucosa; and 3) exclusion of the possibility of the second primary malignancy being a metastasis from the index tumour 25. Some new glottic cancer events were somewhat inconsistent with the second criterion. The glottic anatomic extent of the initial and new glottic lesions overlapped in many new glottic cancer events (12/16, 75.0%). The concept of late recurrence has often been used in breast cancer and typically refers to those events occurring ≥ 5 years after diagnosis 26. However, confirmation of late recurrence requires molecular analysis, which was not performed in this study. If the molecular patterns of initial and new glottic lesions are identical, it may suggest late recurrences 27,28.

One of the strengths of this study was the substantially long follow-up of our patients, with the longest being 266 months. Most studies on early glottic cancer only report 5-year follow-up. Therefore, our study offers a new perspective. Nevertheless, there are limitations to this study that must be acknowledged. The retrospective nature of this single-centre study might limit the generalisability of our findings. In addition, even if all patients were followed up for > 5 years after initial treatment, many were not continuously followed until the time of analysis. Future studies should include a large sample size, ensure longer follow-up duration without follow-up loss and adopt a prospective design to confirm our findings. Furthermore, loss-of-heterozygosity analysis or genetic tests should be performed to distinguish late recurrence from second primary malignancy.

Conclusions

Although early glottic cancer is known to have a relatively good prognosis, new glottic cancer events can occur even after 5 years. Therefore, patients with early glottic cancer may be recommended to undergo laryngoscopic follow-up 5 years after initial treatment if their voices get worse or if they continue smoking. Furthermore, medical staff should provide sufficient information about the negative effects of smoking to all patients.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Enago for English language review.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author contributions

Conception and design: M-SK, T-KK. Analysis and interpretation of the data: M-SK, H-GW, M-WS, T-K K. Drafting of the article: M-SK. Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: T-KK. Final approval of the article: M-SK, T-KK. Administrative, technical, or logistic support: H-GW, M-WS.

Ethical consideration

This study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board (SNUH IRB No.1509-044-702). The need for informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of this analysis.

The research was conducted ethically, with all study procedures being performed in accordance with the requirements of the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki.

Figures and tables

Funding Statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  • 1.Chung SY, Kim KH, Keum KC, et al. Radiotherapy versus cordectomy in the management of early glottic cancer. Cancer Res Treat 2018;50:156-163. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.503 10.4143/crt.2016.503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen JJ, Stessin A, Christos P, et al. Differences in survival outcome between stage I and stage II glottic cancer: a SEER-based analysis. Laryngoscope 2015;125:2093-2098. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25338 10.1002/lary.25338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Park JJ, Won S. Voice outcomes after transoral laser microsurgery or radiotherapy in early glottic cancer: factors to consider. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2019;12:233-234. https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2019.00787 10.21053/ceo.2019.00787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kitani Y, Kubota A, Furukawa M, et al. Prognostic factors for local control in patients receiving radiation therapy for early glottic cancer: anterior commissure involvement and effect of chemoradiotherapy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:1011-1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3579-8 10.1007/s00405-015-3579-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hoffmann C, Hans S, Sadoughi B, et al. Identifying outcome predictors of transoral laser cordectomy for early glottic cancer. Head Neck 2016;38(Suppl 1):E406-E411. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24007 10.1002/hed.24007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yoo J, Lacchetti C, Hammond JA, et al. Role of endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) versus radiotherapy in the management of early (T1) glottic cancer: a systematic review. Head Neck 2014;36:1807-1819. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23504 10.1002/hed.23504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Warner L, Chudasama J, Kelly CG, et al. Radiotherapy versus open surgery versus endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) for early laryngeal squamous cell cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;12:CD002027. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002027.pub2 10.1002/14651858.CD002027.pub2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Taylor SM, Kerr P, Fung K, et al. Treatment of T1b glottic SCC: laser vs radiation – a Canadian multicenter study. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;42:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1916-0216-42-22 10.1186/1916-0216-42-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De Santis RJ, Poon I, Lee J, et al. Comparison of survival between radiation therapy and trans-oral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer patients; a retrospective cohort study. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;45:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-016-0155-1 10.1186/s40463-016-0155-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hirasawa N, Itoh Y, Naganawa S, et al. Multi-institutional analysis of early glottic cancer from 2000 to 2005. Radiat Oncol 2012;7:122. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-122 10.1186/1748-717X-7-122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hoffmann C, Cornu N, Hans S, et al. Early glottic cancer involving the anterior commissure treated by transoral laser cordectomy. Laryngoscope 2016;126:1817-1822. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25757 10.1002/lary.25757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hendriksma M, Montagne MW, Langeveld TPM, et al. Evaluation of surgical margin status in patients with early glottic cancer (Tis-T2) treated with transoral CO2 laser microsurgery, on local control. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018;275:2333-2340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5070-9 10.1007/s00405-018-5070-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Son HJ, Lee YS, Ku JY, et al. Radiological tumor thickness as a risk factor for local recurrence in early glottic cancer treated with laser cordectomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018;275:153-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4793-3 10.1007/s00405-017-4793-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rödel RM, Steiner W, Müller RM, et al. Endoscopic laser surgery of early glottic cancer: involvement of the anterior commissure. Head Neck 2009;31:583-592. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20993 10.1002/hed.20993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jana M, Primož S, Dušan M, et al. Change in voice quality after radiotherapy for early glottic cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2022;17:2993. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14122993”. 10.3390/cancers14122993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jacobi C, Freundorfer R, Reiter M. Transoral laser microsurgery in early glottic cancer involving the anterior commissure. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019;276:837-845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5261-4 10.1007/s00405-018-5261-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ansarin M, Santoro L, Cattaneo A, et al. Laser surgery for early glottic cancer: impact of margin status on local control and organ preservation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135:385-390. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2009.10 10.1001/archoto.2009.10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mizrachi A, Rabinovics N, Hilly O, et al. Analysis of failure following transoral laser surgery for early glottic cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;271:2247-2251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-2964-z 10.1007/s00405-014-2964-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lim YJ, Wu HG, Kwon TK, et al. Long-term outcome of definitive radiotherapy for early glottic cancer: prognostic factors and patterns of local failure. Cancer Res Treat 2015;47:862-870. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.203 10.4143/crt.2014.203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fullmer TM, Shi J, Skinner HD, et al. Early glottic cancer in a veteran population: impact of race on management and outcomes. Laryngoscope 2020;130:1733-1739. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28262 10.1002/lary.28262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Puram SV, Bhattacharyya N. Surgery versus radiation for T1 glottic carcinoma: second primary considerations. Laryngoscope 2019;129:2713-2715. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27854 10.1002/lary.27854 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Amin MB. American Joint Committee on Cancer, American Cancer Society. AJCC cancer staging manual. Eight edition. Chicago, IL, Springer; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chan Y, Irish JC, Wood SJ, et al. Smoking cessation in patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer. J Otolaryngol 2004;33:75-81. https://doi.org/10.2310/7070.2004.0007 10.2310/7070.2004.0007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.von Kroge PR, Bokemeyer F, Ghandili S, et al. The impact of smoking cessation and continuation on recurrence and survival in patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Oncol Res Treat 2020;43:549-558. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509427 10.1159/000509427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.González-García R, Naval-Gías L, Román-Romero L, et al. Local recurrences and second primary tumors from squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a retrospective analytic study of 500 patients. Head Neck 2009;31:1168-1180. htpss://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21088 10.1002/hed.21088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cescon DW, Kalinsky K, Parsons HA, et al. Therapeutic targeting of minimal residual disease to prevent late recurrence in hormone-receptor positive breast cancer: challenges and new approaches. Front Oncol 2022;11:667397. htpps://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.667397 10.3389/fonc.2021.667397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Braakhuis BJ, Tabor MP, Leemans CR, et al. Second primary tumors and field cancerization in oral and oropharyngeal cancer: molecular techniques provide new insights and definitions. Head Neck 2002;24:198-206. 2022;11:667397. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.10042 10.1002/hed.10042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Moon G, Noh H, Cho IJ, et al. Prediction of late recurrence in patients with breast cancer: elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at 5 years after diagnosis and late recurrence. Breast Cancer 2020;27:54-61. htpps://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-019-00994-z 10.1007/s12282-019-00994-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica are provided here courtesy of Pacini Editore

RESOURCES