Correction: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies (2022) 30:51 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-022-00460-2
Following the publication of the original article [1], two errors were identified in the article. The updated text is given below, and the change has been highlighted in bold typeface.
Under the Cracking joints header:
After this crack, with increasing load the line returns to a near horizontal gradient once again, until it reaches a maximum separation of approximately 4 mm; a relatively large separation for an MCP joint!
In the legend of Fig. 11:
MR images before and after cavitation in an MCP joint. The original caption of this figure, reproduced from Kawchuk et al. [33], was “T1 static images of the left hand in the resting phase before cracking (left). The same hand following cracking with the addition of a post-cracking distraction force (right). Note the dark, intraarticular void (yellow arrow)”.
The original article [1] has been corrected.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Reference
- 1.Evans DW. Why is the prevailing model of joint manipulation (still) incorrect? Chiropr Man Therap. 2022;30:51. doi: 10.1186/s12998-022-00460-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]