Abstract
Background:
Emerging evidence suggests that oxidative stress forms a key component in the etiopathogenesis of periodontitis. Literature evidence have shown potential antioxidants responsible for combating the pro-oxidants which stress the periodontium, but the peroxiredoxin-sulfiredoxin system is explored very minimally in periodontal disease. Thus, the present study was aimed to evaluate the genetic association of SRXN1 receptor gene polymorphism (rs6053666).
Materials and Methods:
A total of 100 subjects were recruited for this study, which included 50 Periodontitis patients (Stage II and above based on the criteria of American Association of Periodontology-2018) and 50 periodontally healthy or mild gingivitis. Genomic DNA was extracted from the whole blood collected from the subjects. DNA was amplified using specific primers flanking the BtgI region of the SRXN1 receptor gene. The amplicon was further subjected to genotyping using restriction fragment length using BtgI enzyme. The genotype obtained based on the restriction fragment length polymorphism pattern was recorded and used for statistical analysis. The distribution of genotypes and allele frequencies in the periodontitis and control groups were compared using the Chi-square test. The risk associated with individual alleles or genotypes was calculated as the odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance in all tests was determined at P < 0.05.
Results:
The genotype frequency and distributions of SRXN1 receptor BtgI polymorphism did not differ significantly at ꭕ2df (P = 0.557). Our study results showed that homozygous and heterozygous mutant genotypes had no significant difference (CC vs. CT + TT) between the periodontitis patients and control group with a P = 0.4266. The detected frequency of CT (38% vs. 34%) and TT (42% vs. 52%) genotype showed no significant difference between control and test group. There was no significant difference in C allele (39% vs. 31%) and T allele (61% vs. 69%) between the test and control group.
Conclusion:
The present study denotes that SRXN1 receptor gene polymorphism is not associated with periodontitis in the study group analyzed.
Keywords: Alleles, periodontitis, polymorphism, SRXN1 receptor
Introduction
Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease, influenced by multiple factors that caused destruction of the supporting tissues and resulted in tooth loss.[1,2,3,4] There are various risk factors of periodontitis like diabetes mellitus, smoking which are modifiable risk factors. Whereas Genetics is a nonmodifiable risk factor risk factor which plays a role in determining the host susceptibility to periodontal destruction.[5] A number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) such as interleukin (IL) receptors, Vitamin D receptor, matrix metalloproteinase receptors are determinants in disease susceptibility of genetically complex disease such as chronic periodontitis.[6,7,8,9]
Oxidative stress is an important cause of cell damage associated with initiation and progression of many chronic diseases.[10,11,12] Oxidative stress is the distribution in the pro-oxidant and antioxidant balance, in favor of the former resulting in potential tissue damage. All the cells have intrinsic storage of antioxidant molecules in order to overcome the oxidative stress.[13] Oxidation-reduction reactions of molecular oxygen by various enzymes results in the production of molecules such as superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radicals, singlet oxygen, nitric oxide, hypochlorous acid which together are termed as “reactive oxygen species”(ROS).[13] In the human body all the cells are capable of generating ROS, of which polymorphonuclear neutrophils are of prime importance in relation to periodontitis.[14] Neutrophils are the first line of defense and are located at the sites of microbial invasion which are activated by inflammatory mediators and can generate increased levels of ROS, which not only attack the periodontopathogenic but also the surrounding tissues.[15] ROS is usually generated by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (Nox) system present in neutrophils which catalyzes the reduction of molecular oxygen to superoxide anion.[16] Many studies have shown that ROS regulates the formation and function of osteoclasts i.e., the activation and bone resorption ability.[17,18,19] Bone resorption which results in alveolar bone loss and ultimately tooth loss is the hallmark of periodontal disease.
Hydrogen peroxide is one among the main ROS present in the body. It takes part as a signaling molecule in the regulation of a variety of biological processes. It also acts as a double-edged sword due to its accumulation which can result in cell apoptosis and tissue damage. A cell culture study where human periodontal periodontal ligament cells (PDLC's) were procured from extracted premolars was exposed to hydrogen peroxide in a dose dependent manner and it showed hydrogen peroxide induced apoptosis of PDLC's in a dose and time dependent manner.[20] The antioxidants in action against hydrogen peroxide are catalase, peroxiredoxin, thioredoxin, glutathione peroxidase and they have grouped as “peroxidases.”[21,22]
Scavenging of hydrogen peroxide is largely mediated by the peroxiredoxin-sulfiredoxin system of antioxidants.[23] The activation of peroxiredoxins is dependent on sulfiredoxin. In a cross sectional study, the expression of peroxiredoxins I, II was found to be up-regulated in the gingival biopsies of Type-2 diabetic patients.[24] Still dated there is a controversy regarding the expression/amount of antioxidants and the periodontal status. There has been contradicting evidence where some studies suggest that periodontitis is related to a decreased expression of antioxidant defenses,[25,26] whilst few other studies have suggested that the antioxidant defences are upregulated in periodontal disease.[27,28]
Expression of sulfiredoxin has been observed in macrophages, neurons, hepatocytes, alveolar cells and in tumor cells.[29,30,31,32,33] It has been implicated in numerous oxidative stress induced conditions such as atherosclerosis,[34] chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,[31] and in a wide range of carcinomas involving the various organs of the body.[35,36,37] In the various studies, sulfiredoxin has been projected from being an antioxidant to a prognostic marker and a potential chemotherapeutic agent.[38] A recent cross-sectional study has shown that sulfiredoxin levels are highly expressed in the gingival tissues of chronic periodontitis.[39] Thus the present study was first of its type to evaluate the association of SRXN1 receptor gene SNP rs6053666 in periodontitis patients.
Materials and Methods
The study complies with Declaration of Helsinki. A total of 100 individuals who reported to the Department of Periodontics were included in this cross sectional study. The sample size was calculated based on the previous study by Kaarthikeyan et al.[40] based on which sample size of 100 was derived keeping the power of the study as 80%. The subjects were divided into a Periodontitis group and a control group based on the clinical examination of probing pocket depth, clinical attachment loss and bleeding on probing. The periodontitis group contained 50 patients (male-26; female-24) and the control group had 50 subjects (male-26; female-24). The Periodontitis patients were diagnosed based on the criteria of American Association of Periodontology (AAP)-2018.[41]
Inclusion criteria
Control group
Patients who are systemically and periodontally healthy or mild gingivitis (gingival index <1).
Test group
Patients who are systemically healthy, diagnosed as Stage II periodontitis or above based on the criteria of American AAP-2018.
Exclusion criteria
Smokers, pregnant or lactating mothers, immunocompromised individuals, subjects who underwent periodontal therapy within the past 6 months were excluded from this study.
The ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha University IHEC/SDC/PERIO-1801/21/63 and written informed consent was obtained from all the patients who participated in the study.
Sample collection
A volume of 2 ml of venous blood was collected from antecubital fossa and dispersed into a sterile tube containing a pinch of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid. It was mixed thoroughly to avoid clot formation. DNA isolation was performed according to the modified Miller et al. 1988 protocol.[42]
Polymerase chain reaction and restriction endonuclease digestion
SRXN1 receptor gene (BtgI) polymorphism (rs6053666) was assessed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and digestion. The following primers, forward primer: 5’-GGATACAGCAGCCATCTTGG-3’ and reverse primer: 5’-CTTGAAGAGCCACGTGCTG-3’ were used for amplification of DNA spanning the BtgI polymorphic site, of the SRXN1 receptor gene. The amplification of DNA was performed in 20 μl volumes using 10 ng of genomic DNA, 5 pmol/μl each of forward and reverse primers along with PCR master mix (Takara, Japan). The cycling conditions were as follows: Initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, denaturation at 94°C for 35 s, annealing at 60°C for 35 s, extension at 72°C for 35 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. 5 μl of PCR product was checked on a 2% agarose gel [Figure 1]. Fifteen microliter of PCR product was digested using BtgI restriction enzyme procured from New England Biolabs, England. Digestion was carried out at 37°C for 2 h. The digested product was visualized on a 2.5% agarose gel and the results were documented [Figure 2].
Figure 1.

Agarose gel electrophoretogram of T/C polymorphism (rs6053666) of SRXN1 gene showing 290 bp amplicon in lanes 2–6 (Lanes 7 [M]: 100 bp DNA ladder), Lane 1: Negative control
Figure 2.

BtgI digestion of polymerase chain reaction amplified product (Lane 1: CT heterozygous, 2-4: TT homozygous and 5: CC-homozygous variant)
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical package for the Social Sciences Version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The distribution of genotypes and allele frequencies in the periodontitis and control groups were compared using the Chi-square test. The risk associated with individual alleles or genotypes was calculated as the odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance in all tests was determined at P < 0.05.
Results
The periodontitis group contained 50 patients with the mean age of 39.02 ± 8.22 years. The control group contained 50 periodontally healthy or mild gingivitis subjects with mean age of 41.34 ± 7.49. The clinical characteristics of the subjects in periodontitis and control groups are shown in Table 1. The genotype and allele frequencies of the group are shown in Tables 2 and 3. The genotype frequency and distributions of SRXN1 receptor BtgI polymorphism did not differ significantly at ꭕ2df (P = 0.557). Our study results showed that homozygous and heterozygous mutant genotypes had no significant difference (CC vs. CT + TT) between the periodontitis and control group with a P = 0.4266. The detected frequency of CT (38% vs. 34%) and TT (42% vs. 52%) genotype showed no significant difference between control and periodontitis group. There was no significant difference in C allele (39% vs. 31%) and T allele (61% vs. 69%) between the periodontitis and control group.
Table 1.
Demographic data of periodontitis and control groups
| Clinical characters | Periodontitis group | Control group |
|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects | ||
| Male | 26 | 26 |
| Female | 24 | 24 |
| Total | 50 | 50 |
| Mean age | 39.02±8.22 | 41.34±7.488 |
| Clinical attachment loss | 6.13±1.29 | - |
| Probing pocket depth | 5.48±1.15 | 1.60±0.57 |
| Gingival index | 1.74±0.22 | 0.76±0.16 |
Table 2.
Genotype frequencies of SRXN1 gene polymorphism (rs6053666) among the cases and controls
| Groups | CC | CT | TT | C | T | HWE (P)* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case (n=50) | 7 | 17 | 26 | 0.31 | 0.69 | 0.146 |
| Control (n=50) | 10 | 19 | 21 | 0.39 | 0.61 | 0.154 |
*For departure from HWE, Chi-square with one degree of freedom. The genotype frequency of cases and controls do not differ significantly χ2 df (P=0.557). HWE: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
Table 3.
Overall genotype distribution of the SRXN1 gene polymorphism (rs6053666) gene polymorphism in cases and controls
| Genotypes | Case | Control | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominant | ||||
| CC | 7 | 10 | 0.65 (0.2262-1.8748) | 0.4266 |
| CT+TT | 43 | 40 | ||
| Recessive | ||||
| TT | 26 | 21 | 1.49 (0.6793-3.2945) | 0.3173 |
| CT+CC | 24 | 29 | ||
| Allele | ||||
| C | 31 | 39 | 0.7027 (0.3919-1.2601) | 0.2364 |
| T | 69 | 61 |
OR: Odds ration; CI: Confidence interval
Discussion
The genetic polymorphism influences susceptibility of periodontitis and there are various gene polymorphisms which are shown to play a role in periodontitis.[6,7,8,9] Experimental evidence gathered from various studies have identified genes encoding immune-regulatory and immune-modulatory molecules such as chemokines (CXCR2), cytokines (IL), surface receptors (Vitamin D receptors), antigen recognition proteins (FC gamma) etc.,[43]
Our study results showed that the genotype frequency and distributions of SRXN1 receptor BtgI polymorphism did not differ significantly at ꭕ2df (P = 0.557). Our study results showed that homozygous and heterozygous mutant genotypes had no significant difference (CC vs. CT + TT) between the periodontitis and control group with a P = 0.4266. The detected frequency of CT (38% vs. 34%) and TT (42% vs. 52%) genotype showed no significant difference between healthy control and periodontitis group. There was no significant difference in C allele (39% vs. 31%) and T allele (61% vs. 69%) between the periodontitis and control group.
Sulfiredoxin is primarily located in the cytosol and in case of severe oxidative stress, it translocates into the mitochondria.[44] Human sulfiredoxin gene is located on chromosome 20 in the region of short arm p13 where the gene is 6632 bp in length, composed of 2 exons. The size of Srx mRNA is 2580 bp.[45] Sulfiredoxin transcript contains two exons and the catalytic domain of sulfiredoxin reducing enzyme activity is localized in the exon.[46]
Previous study by Kunnas et al. showed that rs6053666 of SRXN1 was associated with cerebrovascular disorder.[47] Also studies have shown that the C allele of rs6053666 of SRXN1 gene was associated with a decrease in breast carcinoma.[48] Previous study done by Ramesh et al. has shown that sulfiredoxin were significantly increased in the gingival tissue samples of chronic periodontitis patients and this paved the way for conducting the present study to analyse the association between SRXN1 gene polymorphism and periodontitis. But the results of the present study showed no significant relation between SRXN1 gene polymorphism and periodontitis. This suggests that the increased sulfiredoxin in chronic periodontitis observed in the previous study could be due to the local oxidative imbalance due to the presence of microorganisms. It has been reported that bacterial lipopolysaccharide at the local site of inflammation induces the sulfiredoxin expression.[28,29,39] However in the present study we have evaluated only the SRXN1 receptor gene polymorphism and further genetic studies are warranted to rule out any other genetic predisposition for periodontitis with respect to sulfiredoxin gene.
Hence, studies in a large population size including various ethnic groups at multicenter are required to arrive at a statistically significant observation.
The present study was limited to genetic polymorphism in periodontitis (Stage II and III and Grade B) patients; future studies need to be done as a multicentered study, different ethnic groups in a larger study sample.
Conclusion
The present study denotes that SRXN1 gene polymorphism is not associated with periodontitis (Stage II and III and Grade B) in the study group analyzed. Further studies are required to explore the interaction of BtgI-SRXN1 receptor gene with microbial and environmental factors in the etiopathogenesis of Periodontitis and link between SRXN1 receptor gene in periodontitis patients with systemic diseases.
Consent for publication
The patient has given valid and informed consent for publication.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that we have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient has given his consent for his image and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands the name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal the identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgment
The authors are thankful to the management of Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science (SIMATS), Chennai, India, and Department of Clinical Genetics Lab, Centre for Cellular and Molecular Research for the facilities, encouragement and constant support to carry out this work.
References
- 1.Gomez RS, Dutra WO, Moreira PR. Epigenetics and periodontal disease: Future perspectives. Inflamm Res. 2009;58:625–9. doi: 10.1007/s00011-009-0041-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Taba M, Jr, Jin Q, Sugai JV, Giannobile WV. Current concepts in periodontal bioengineering. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2005;8:292–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2005.00352.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kinane DF, Hart TC. Genes and gene polymorphisms associated with periodontal disease. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003;14:430–49. doi: 10.1177/154411130301400605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pihlstrom BL, McHuon RB, Oliphant TH, Ortiz-Campos C. Comparison of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of periodontal disease. A review of current studies and additional results after 6 ½ years. J Clin Periodontol. 1983;10:524–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1983.tb02182.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hassell TM, Harris EL. Genetic influences in caries and periodontal diseases. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1995;6:319–42. doi: 10.1177/10454411950060040401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pontes CC, Gonzales JR, Novaes AB, Jr, Taba Júnior M, Grisi MF, Michel J, et al. Interleukin-4 gene polymorphism and its relation to periodontal disease in a Brazilian population of African heritage. J Dent. 2004;32:241–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Trevilatto PC, de Souza Pardo AP, Scarel-Caminaga RM, de Brito RB, Jr, Alvim-Pereira F, Alvim-Pereira CC, et al. Association of IL1 gene polymorphisms with chronic periodontitis in Brazilians. Arch Oral Biol. 2011;56:54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Murthykumar K, Arjunkumar R, Jayaseelan VP. Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism (rs10735810) and chronic periodontitis. J Investig Clin Dent. 2019;10:e12440. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Murthykumar K, Varghese S, Priyadharsini JV. Association of MMP8 (799C/T) (rs11225395) gene polymorphism and chronic periodontitis. Drug Invent Today. 2019;11:1594–7. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kim GH, Kim JE, Rhie SJ, Yoon S. The role of oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. Exp Neurobiol. 2015;24:325–40. doi: 10.5607/en.2015.24.4.325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fischer BM, Voynow JA, Ghio AJ. COPD: Balancing oxidants and antioxidants. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015;10:261–76. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S42414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chapple IL, Matthews JB. The role of reactive oxygen and antioxidant species in periodontal tissue destruction. Periodontol 2000. 2007;43:160–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00178.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sies H. Oxidative stress: Oxidants and antioxidants. Exp Physiol. 1997;82:291–5. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1997.sp004024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Newman MG, Takei H, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA. St. Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011. Carranza's Clinical Periodontology; p. 872. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nagata M. Inflammatory cells and oxygen radicals. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy. 2005;4:503–4. doi: 10.2174/1568010054526322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Iyer GY, Questel JH. NADPH and NADH oxidation by guinea pig polymorphonuclear leucocytes. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1963;41:427–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Garrett IR, Boyce BF, Oreffo RO, Bonewald L, Poser J, Mundy GR. Oxygen-derived free radicals stimulate osteoclastic bone resorption in rodent bone in vitro and in vivo . J Clin Invest. 1990;85:632–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI114485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bax BE, Alam AS, Banerji B, Bax CM, Bevis PJ, Stevens CR, et al. Stimulation of osteoclastic bone resorption by hydrogen peroxide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;183:1153–8. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(05)80311-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lean JM, Jagger CJ, Kirstein B, Fuller K, Chambers TJ. Hydrogen peroxide is essential for estrogen-deficiency bone loss and osteoclast formation. Endocrinology. 2005;146:728–35. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wu W, Yang N, Feng X, Sun T, Shen P, Sun W. Effect of vitamin C administration on hydrogen peroxide-induced cytotoxicity in periodontal ligament cells. Mol Med Rep. 2015;11:242–8. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.O’Brien PJ. Peroxidases. Chem Biol Interact. 2000;129:113–39. doi: 10.1016/s0009-2797(00)00201-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lemberg R, Foulkes EC. Reaction between catalase and hydrogen peroxide. Nature. 1948;161:131. doi: 10.1038/161131a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rhee SG, Kang SW, Chang TS, Jeong W, Kim K. Peroxiredoxin, a novel family of peroxidases. IUBMB Life. 2001;52:35–41. doi: 10.1080/15216540252774748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Duarte PM, Napimoga MH, Fagnani EC, Santos VR, Bastos MF, Ribeiro FV, et al. The expression of antioxidant enzymes in the gingivae of type 2 diabetics with chronic periodontitis. Arch Oral Biol. 2012;57:161–8. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tsai CC, Chen HS, Chen SL, Ho YP, Ho KY, Wu YM, et al. Lipid peroxidation: A possible role in the induction and progression of chronic periodontitis. J Periodontal Res. 2005;40:378–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2005.00818.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Konopka T, Król K, Kopeć W, Gerber H. Total antioxidant status and 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine levels in gingival and peripheral blood of periodontitis patients. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 2007;55:417–22. doi: 10.1007/s00005-007-0047-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Surdacka A, Ciężka E, Pioruńska-Stolzmann M, Wender-Ożegowska E, Korybalska K, Kawka E, et al. Relation of salivary antioxidant status and cytokine levels to clinical parameters of oral health in pregnant women with diabetes. Arch Oral Biol. 2011;56:428–36. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kim SC, Kim OS, Kim OJ, Kim YJ, Chung HJ. Antioxidant profile of whole saliva after scaling and root planing in periodontal disease. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2010;40:164–71. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2010.40.4.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Diet A, Abbas K, Bouton C, Guillon B, Tomasello F, Fourquet S, et al. Regulation of peroxiredoxins by nitric oxide in immunostimulated macrophages. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:36199–205. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706420200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Soriano FX, Léveillé F, Papadia S, Higgins LG, Varley J, Baxter P, et al. Induction of sulfiredoxin expression and reduction of peroxiredoxin hyperoxidation by the neuroprotective Nrf2 activator 3H-1,2-dithiole-3-thione. J Neurochem. 2008;107:533–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05648.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Singh A, Ling G, Suhasini AN, Zhang P, Yamamoto M, Navas-Acien A, et al. Nrf2-dependent sulfiredoxin-1 expression protects against cigarette smoke-induced oxidative stress in lungs. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009;46:376–86. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.10.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wu L, Jiang H, Chawsheen HA, Mishra M, Young MR, Gerard M, et al. Tumor promoter-induced sulfiredoxin is required for mouse skin tumorigenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35:1177–84. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgu035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bae SH, Woo HA, Sung SH, Lee HE, Lee SK, Kil IS, et al. Induction of sulfiredoxin via an Nrf2-dependent pathway and hyperoxidation of peroxiredoxin III in the lungs of mice exposed to hyperoxia. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009;11:937–48. doi: 10.1089/ars.2008.2325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Harada N, Ito K, Hosoya T, Mimura J, Maruyama A, Noguchi N, et al. Nrf2 in bone marrow-derived cells positively contributes to the advanced stage of atherosclerotic plaque formation. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;53:2256–62. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wei Q, Jiang H, Matthews CP, Colburn NH. Sulfiredoxin is an AP-1 target gene that is required for transformation and shows elevated expression in human skin malignancies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:19738–43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810676105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Soini Y, Eskelinen M, Juvonen P, Kärjä V, Haapasaari KM, Saarela A, et al. Nuclear Nrf2 expression is related to a poor survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. 2014;210:35–9. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2013.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Merikallio H, Pääkkö P, Kinnula VL, Harju T, Soini Y. Nuclear factor erythroid-derived 2-like 2 (Nrf2) and DJ1 are prognostic factors in lung cancer. Hum Pathol. 2012;43:577–84. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ramesh A, Varghese SS, Doraiswamy J, Malaiappan S. Role of sulfiredoxin in systemic diseases influenced by oxidative stress. Redox Biol. 2014;2:1023–8. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2014.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ramesh A, Varghese S, Jayakumar ND, Malaiappan S. Comparative estimation of sulfiredoxin levels between chronic periodontitis and healthy patients – A case-control study. J Periodontol. 2018;89:1241–8. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kaarthikeyan G, Jayakumar ND, Padmalatha O, Varghese S, Anand B. Analysis of association of TaqI VDR gene polymorphism with the chronic periodontitis in Dravidian ethnicity. Indian J Hum Genet. 2013;19:465–8. doi: 10.4103/0971-6866.124377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Papapanou PN, Sanz M, Buduneli N, Dietrich T, Feres M, Fine DH, et al. Periodontitis: Consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S173–82. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16:1215. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.3.1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.da Silva MK, de Carvalho AC, Alves EH, da Silva FR, Pessoa LD, Vasconcelos DF. Genetic factors and the risk of periodontitis development: Findings from a systematic review composed of 13 studies of meta-analysis with 71,531 participants. Int J Dent 2017. 2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/1914073. 1914073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Biteau B, Labarre J, Toledano MB. ATP-dependent reduction of cysteine-sulphinic acid by S. cerevisiae sulphiredoxin. Nature. 2003;425:980–4. doi: 10.1038/nature02075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sun Y, Hegamyer G, Colburn NH. Molecular cloning of five messenger RNAs differentially expressed in preneoplastic or neoplastic JB6 mouse epidermal cells: One is homologous to human tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3. Cancer Res. 1994;54:1139–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Woo HA, Jeong W, Chang TS, Park KJ, Park SJ, Yang JS, et al. Reduction of cysteine sulfinic acid by sulfiredoxin is specific to 2-cys peroxiredoxins. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:3125–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C400496200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kunnas T, Määttä K, Nikkari ST. Genetic polymorphisms of transcription factor NRF2 and of its host gene sulfiredoxin (SRXN1) are associated with cerebrovascular disease in a Finnish cohort, the TAMRISK study. Int J Med Sci. 2016;13:325–9. doi: 10.7150/ijms.14849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hartikainen JM, Tengström M, Kosma VM, Kinnula VL, Mannermaa A, Soini Y. Genetic polymorphisms and protein expression of NRF2 and sulfiredoxin predict survival outcomes in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2012;72:5537–46. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-1474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
