Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 25;11(1):47. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11010047

Table 2.

Identified differential lipid metabolites between the AS and HCs.

Metabolite a VIP bp Value c FDR d FC
DAG (16:0/18:2) 2.099 <0.001 <0.001 1.520
LPC 20:3(SN2) 1.573 0.001 <0.001 1.266
PC (16:0e/26:4) 3.123 <0.001 <0.001 0.635
PC (16:1e/18:2) 1.559 <0.001 <0.001 0.743
PC (18:1/18:2.1) 1.805 <0.001 0.001 0.814
PC (18:1/22:6) 1.924 <0.001 0.001 0.759
PC (18:1e/18:2) 2.693 <0.001 <0.001 0.745
PC (20:4e/26:4) 1.889 <0.001 <0.001 0.666
PE (16:0e/22:6) 1.589 <0.001 0.001 0.856
TAG (16:0/18:1/22:5) 2.425 <0.001 <0.001 1.426
TAG (16:0/18:2/20:4) 1.783 <0.001 <0.001 1.494
TAG (16:0/20:4/22:6) 1.864 <0.001 <0.001 1.475
TAG (18:0/18:1/18:1) 2.065 <0.001 <0.001 1.456
TAG (18:0/18:1/20:4) 3.104 <0.001 <0.001 1.726
TAG (18:1/18:2/22:5) 2.684 <0.001 <0.001 1.548

a VIP was obtained from the OPLS-DA model with a threshold of 1.0. b p Values were obtained from one-way ANOVA. The value of c FDR was obtained from the adjusted p Value in the metaboanalyst 5.0 software. The value of d FC was obtained by comparing those metabolites in patients with AS with the HCs. VIP: variable importance in the projection, FC: fold change, and FDR: false discovery rate.