Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 12;9(1):61. doi: 10.3390/gels9010061

Table 3.

Hardness of Kaniwa mousse according to gelling agent.

Concentration (%) Hardness (N/m2) 1 F-Value 2
(p-Value)
Guar Gum Locust Bean Gum Xanthan Gum
1 13,953.67 ± 664.29 fA 3730.33 ± 72.46 fB 2878.67 ± 144.92 gC 731.169 ***
(0.000)
3 44,479.00 ± 1284.08 eA 9480.67 ± 245.08 eB 6417.00 ± 298.68 fC 2238.155 ***
(0.000)
5 50,600.00 ± 2455.20 eA 28,940.33 ± 1240.83 dB 12,738.67 ± 204.53 eC 426.793 ***
(0.000)
7 71,805.67 ± 3142.66 dA 39,700.00 ± 1473.09 cB 15,471.33 ± 761.10 dC 569.243 ***
(0.000)
9 112,701.67 ± 5563.86 cA 45,338.00 ± 2019.85 bB 23,500.00 ± 1000.00 cC 539.943 ***
(0.000)
11 141,433.33 ± 6880.65 bA 55,033.33 ± 2000.83 aB 25,633.33 ± 1184.62 bC 618.169 ***
(0.000)
13 151,033.33 ± 4528.06 aA 57,558.67 ± 2796.59 aB 28,366.67 ± 1096.97 aC 1251.547 ***
(0.000)
F-value
(p-value)
489.888 ***
(0.000)
480.394 ***
(0.000)
464.420 ***
(0.000)

1 The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation of the experiment repeated three times. 2 One-way ANOVA was used, and different letters in the same row (A~C) and column (a~g) mean a significant difference at *** p < 0.001.