Abstract
The introduction of CRISPR technologies has revolutionized strain engineering in filamentous fungi. However, its use in commercial applications has been hampered by concerns over intellectual property (IP) ownership, and there is a need for implementing Cas nucleases that are not limited by complex IP constraints. One promising candidate in this context is the Mad7 enzyme, and we here present a versatile Mad7-CRISPR vector-set that can be efficiently used for the genetic engineering of four different Aspergillus species: Aspergillus nidulans, A. niger, A. oryzae and A. campestris, the latter being a species that has never previously been genetically engineered. We successfully used Mad7 to introduce unspecific as well as specific template-directed mutations including gene disruptions, gene insertions and gene deletions. Moreover, we demonstrate that both single-stranded oligonucleotides and PCR fragments equipped with short and long targeting sequences can be used for efficient marker-free gene editing. Importantly, our CRISPR/Mad7 system was functional in both non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) proficient and deficient strains. Therefore, the newly implemented CRISPR/Mad7 was efficient to promote gene deletions and integrations using different types of DNA repair in four different Aspergillus species, resulting in the expansion of CRISPR toolboxes in fungal cell factories.
Keywords: Aspergillus, CRISPR, Mad7, fungal strain engineering
1. Introduction
Filamentous fungi are extensively used as producers of industrial enzymes and metabolites that are applied by the food and pharma industries [1,2]. In this context, it is important to stress that genome sequencing studies have demonstrated that the potential of new product discovery in fungi is vast [3,4,5]. A bottleneck in exploiting the full fungal production potential is the lack of genetic engineering tools that enable efficient product discovery and process optimization. The recent introduction of CRISPR technology in fungi promises to reduce this barrier, as efficient gene-editing methods based on CRISPR nucleases such as Cas9 and Cpf1 (Cas12a) have demonstrated their widespread functionality and applications in many different fungal species [6,7,8,9]. CRISPR-based gene editing can be achieved by exploiting that programmed CRISPR nuclease-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DNA DSBs) are mostly repaired by pathways based on non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR) [10,11,12,13]. Introduction of unspecific mutations at a defined genomic site can be achieved when CRISPR nuclease-induced DNA DSBs are repaired by flawed NHEJ repair. In this case, unspecific mutation of the target site typically disrupts a cycle of accurate DNA DSB repair by NHEJ or HR followed by re-cutting of the restored target site by the CRISPR nuclease. Hence, implementation of the mutation typically takes some generations [14]. Introduction of specific mutations require that the CRISPR nuclease-induced DNA DSB are repaired by HR using a tailor-made repair template, RT. Typically, RTs are classical gene-targeting substrates, but other substrates such as single-stranded oligonucleotides can also be used [15]. The success rate of this type of gene editing is reflecting competition between repairing the CRISPR nuclease-induced DNA DSB by HR using the desired RT or by flawed NHEJ. Hence, highly efficient specific CRISPR-based mutagenesis can be achieved by eliminating the NHEJ pathway in the target species [15]. A well-known mutation that results in NHEJ-deficient strains is the deletion of the ku70 gene [16].
Despite the rapid implementation of CRISPR technology in a broad range of fungi [14,17,18], uncertainties in IP ownership, royalty complications and license fees constrain the full use of CRISPR technology in the industry [7,19]. Hence, it is desirable to expand the repertoire of efficient CRISPR nucleases with no or less IP issues. One alternative CRISPR nuclease, Mad7 (also known as ErCas12a), is accompanied by a straightforward license that allows free use for commercial and academic research and for development purposes [19]. Mad7 is a CRISPR nuclease based on a codon-optimized gene from the Eubacterium rectale (refseq WP_055225123.1). The codon-optimized mad7 gene shows 76% identity to the native E. rectale nucleotide sequence and encodes for a monomeric protein composed by 1263 amino acid residues with a molecular weight of 147.9 kDa. Similar to Cpf1 but not Cas9, Mad7 naturally employs a single RNA species to guide it to the target DNA sequence and it creates DNA DSB with sticky ends rather than blunt ends. Mad7 displays a preference for a 5′-TTTN-3′ PAM site [20] rather than 5′-NGG-3′, which is preferred by Cas9, see Figure 1A. We have previously demonstrated that Mad7 can be used to introduce a gene-expression cassette into a synthetic targeting site present in a set of Aspergillus strains [21]. However, no versatile system has so far been developed for use of Mad7 in filamentous fungi. Here, we present six different AMA1-based Mad7-CRISPR vectors that contain different selectable markers, and which can easily be reprogrammed to encode new gRNA species (Figure 1B) via USER cloning or other methods including Gibson- or in vivo assembly [22,23]. Moreover, we show that Mad7 can be used to support a range of gene-editing reactions in four different Aspergilli including a wild-type isolate from a species, which has not previously been genetically engineered.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Strains and Media
Propagation of all plasmids was performed in Escherichia coli strain DH5α. The cells were cultured for 12 h at 37 °C on Luria broth (LB) plates, prepared with 25 g/L of LB with agar and supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin. Cultivations for plasmid rescue with liquid LB media were prepared with 25 g/L LB and supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin.
The Aspergilli strains used in this study are presented in Table 1. All Aspergilli were cultivated on standard solid glucose-based minimal medium (MM) (1% glucose, 1 × nitrate salt solution, 0.001% Thiamine, 1 × trace metal solution, 2% agar), supplemented when required with 10 mM uridine (Uri), 10 mM uracil (Ura), and/or 4 mM L-arginine (Arg). Transformation media (TM) was prepared as MM media, apart from glucose, which was replaced with 1 M sucrose. Media for two-layer plating was freshly prepared and depending on the layer 75 µg/mL or 300 µg/mL hygromycin was added.
Table 1.
2.2. PCR and Assembly of Plasmids by USER Cloning
All primers were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) and their sequences can be found in Table S1. PCR fragments for cloning were amplified in 35 cycles using proof-reading Phusion U Hot Start DNA Polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the instructions of the supplier. Standard reaction volumes were 50 μL containing 25 μL Phusion U Hot Start PCR Master Mix, 0.5 μM primers, 10–50 ng plasmid template and MilliQ water to reach the desired final volume. All vectors (see Table S2) were assembled by USER cloning [29].
Diagnostic PCR reactions were performed using DNA from conidia as template and MyTaq™ Plant-PCR Kit (Bioline). Prior to PCR reaction, spore suspensions were prepared by adding spores into 20 μL MilliQ water. The resulting samples were microwaved at 800 Watts for 3 min. Standard reaction volumes for diagnostic PCRs were 20 μL including 0.5 μM primers, 10 μL MyTaq™ Plant-PCR Kit, 3 μL of spore suspension and MilliQ water to reach the final volume.
The ErCas12a gene from Eubacterium rectale [20] was codon-optimized for translation in A. niger and synthetized by GeneArt™ (Thermo Fisher Scientific). USER compatible backbone encoding the ErCas12a gene was created by fusing it with A. nidulans tef1 promoter and terminator and then by incorporating into a digested USER vector backbone. The primer fusing the tef1 promoter with the digested backbone included a new USER restriction site (PacI/Nt.BbvCI USER cassette). A total of six Mad7-CRISPR vectors with different selective markers: pDIV298 (pyrG, selection/counterselection by uracil + uridine prototrophy/5-fluoroorotic acid), pDIV299 (argB, selection by arginine prototrophy), pDIV300 (hygB, selection by hygromycin resistance), pDIV301 (ble, selection by bleomycin resistance), pDIV302 (nat, selection by nourseothricin resistance) and pDIV303 (amdS, selection/counterselection by acetamide prototrophy/fluoroacetamide) were constructed by inserting a PCR fragment containing the Ptef1::ErCas12a::Ttef1 into USER cassette of pAC572, pAC573, pAC574, pAC575, pDIV296 and pDIV297, respectively (see Table S2). The PCR fragment containing the ErCas12a gene was generated by primers PR_DIV1503 and PR_DIV1504 using the synthetic gene from GeneArt™ as a template. Newly created Mad7-CRISPR USER compatible backbones were used in subsequent experiments to create vectors encoding the gRNA expression cassette. The gRNA cassette was constructed fusing two PCR products by USER fusion, see Figure S1.
The mRFP gene-targeting PCR fragments for A. nidulans and A. niger were created with primers containing overhangs at the 5′ ends homologous to yA (PR_DIV3219- PR_DIV3220 and albA (PR_DIV3217- PR_DIV3218), respectively (See Table S1). In case of A. campestris, we used a plasmid containing a 54 bp synthetic CRISPR-targeting site (CTS) covering multiple Mad7, Cas9 and Cpf1 PAM sequences, flanked by 2 kb homology arms upstream and downstream of the ku70 locus (PR_DIV3073-PR_DIV3074 and PR_DIV3075-PR_DIV3076). In case of A. oryzae, a plasmid containing the same short linker as described above for A. campestris flanked by 1.4 kb homology arms upstream and downstream of the ku70 locus. This plasmid was used as PCR template to amplify to fragments and both fragments have 700 bp overlapping region (PR_DIV3091-PR_DIV3092 and PR_DIV3093-PR_DIV3094).
2.3. Transformation and Strain Validation by Diagnostic PCR
Protoplasts were generated as described by Nielsen et al. [26]. For transformation, approximately 107 protoplasts and 1 μg of Mad7-CRISPR-tRNA vector were mixed with 150 μL PCT solution and incubated for 10 min at room temperature, followed by addition of 250 μL of ATB and plating on TM with selection.
TM plates were incubated at 37 °C (A. nidulans) or at 30 °C (A. oryzae and A. campestris). Transformations of A. niger were performed using a two-layer plating procedure and in some cases two different temperatures; for more details see section “Two-phase protocol” below. In gene-editing experiments, we added either 1 μg of oligonucleotides (IDT, see Table S1) or 1 μg of mRFP gene-targeting PCR fragment as RT, together with 1 μg of Mad7-CRISPR-tRNA vector. For A. campestris, the deletion cassette was liberated and linearized from pDIV708 digestion with SwaI, and 1 μg was used for transformation together with 1 μg of CRISPR Mad7 vectors. For A. oryzae, 0.7 μg of each PCR fragment (see Section 2.2) was used as template together with 1 μg of Mad7-CRISPR-tRNA vector.
Target-specific genome engineering was analyzed by diagnostic PCR. Primers for detecting precise gene-editing mutations were designed to anneal up- and downstream from the gene-targeting sequence or within the PCR construct. The amplified bands for gene-targeting experiments with oligonucleotides were subsequently purified with Illustra GFX PCR DNA and Gel Band Purification Kit (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences) and sent for sequencing (StarSEQ).
2.4. Two-Phase Protocol
The procedure includes a first phase favoring Mad7 activity and a second phase favoring fungal recovery. Specifically, a mixture of protoplasts and DNA is incubated on ice for 15 min. Next, 1 mL PCT is added, and the mixture is then incubated for 15 min at room temperature. After incubation, 13 mL of TM with 75 µg/mL hygromycin for A. niger and 50 µg/mL for A. campestris is gently added to the mix. The total volume is then poured into an empty Petri dish. This first layer is allowed to solidify before the plate is incubated at 37 °C. Other incubation temperatures may be used as controls; see Section 3.4. The second TM layer, containing higher hygromycin concentrations (300 µg/mL for A. niger and 100 µg/mL hygromycin for A. campestris), is added the next day. Plates are then incubated at the temperature optimum of the fungus as well as at a control temperature; see Section 3.4. On the third day, all plates including controls are incubated at a temperature favorable for growth of the target fungus for approximately 3–4 days for A. niger and 7–10 days for A. campestris.
2.5. Fluorescence Photography
Red fluorescence was examined using our previously described in-house build digital camera setup [30]. Images of agar plates with either A. nidulans or A. niger colonies were captured using an SLR camera (Nikon D90) equipped with Light and Filter set (NIGHTSEA™). Camera settings for fluorescent images were as follows: ISO Speed—ISO250, F-stop—f/7.1, Exposure time—1.6 s, Focal length—60 mm. Images were saved in JPEG format with a 300 dpi resolution.
3. Results
3.1. A Versatile Mad7 System to Facilitate CRISPR-Based Gene Editing
To enhance functionality in fungi, our Mad7-CRISPR vectors contain a mad7 gene, which is codon-optimized for expression in A. niger and extended by a sequence encoding the SV40 nuclear localization signal (PKKKRKV) to ensure nuclear transport of Mad7. The strong constitutive A. nidulans tef1 promoter and terminator [31,32] were selected to control mad7 expression. In our system (Figure 1B), the gRNA is released from a single glycine tRNA-based splicing-cassette [33] from a construct controlled by the A. fumigatus U3 polymerase III promoter and terminator, which we have previously employed for this purpose [15].
3.2. Mad7 Efficiently Mediates Template-Directed Mutagenesis and Gene Disruption in A. nidulans
Since the native producer of Mad7, Eubacterium rectale, is a prominent human gut symbiont growing at 37 °C, we reasoned that Mad7 may show higher activity at this temperature. Indeed, Mad7 gene-editing experiments in Bacillus subtilis were performed at 37 °C [34]. In a first test of our Mad7-CRISPR system for genetic engineering of filamentous fungi, we selected the fungus A. nidulans as it prefers to grow at 37 °C. Specifically, we chose the NHEJ-deficient strain NID1 (see Table 1) and investigated whether Mad7 would be able to stimulate site-directed mutagenesis and gene disruption/insertion. Accordingly, using pDIV298 as backbone, we constructed a Mad7-CRISPR vector, pDIV711, which encodes a gRNA targeting the yA gene [15,35]. Inactivation of yA causes the normally green conidia of A. nidulans to turn yellow (Figure 2B), a phenotype that is easy to score [36]. To explore the possibility of using Mad7 for gene editing, we co-transformed A. nidulans protoplasts with pDIV711 and a RT. For site-directed mutagenesis, we used a 90 nt (nucleotides) single-stranded oligonucleotide (PR_DIV3197), which bridges the potential Mad7-induced DNA DSB as RT. This oligonucleotide is able to introduce an XbaI site and an amber stop codon in yA that disrupts its function [30], see Figure 2A. For introduction of mRFP into yA, a PCR fragment was used as RT. This fragment contained mRFP flanked by 60 bp of up- and 60 bp of downstream sequences relative to the position of the DNA DSB see Figure 2A. Protoplasts were plated on solid TM medium containing arginine for selection of pDIV711. Control experiments where A. nidulans was transformed with an empty Mad7-CRISPR vector or with the same amounts of a yA-Mad7-CRISPR vector in the absence of a RT produced ten and zero, transformants, respectively (see Figure 2C). This result indicates that Mad7 guided by the yA-gRNA is able to make lethal DNA DSBs in the NHEJ-deficient A. nidulans strains. In agreement with this, transformants were recovered when pDIV711 was co-transformed with either the oligonucleotide or the mRFP-PCR fragment as RT. The observation that lethal CRISPR nuclease-induced breaks are rescued in the presence of an appropriate RT is indicative of a successful gene-editing experiment, and we have previously called this a TAPE test [37]. Indeed, in the presence of the repair oligonucleotide, all transformants were yellow; and in the presence of the mRFP-PCR fragment, all transformants were, unlike the control strains, able to emit red fluorescent light. Two additional trials for each experiment were performed with similar results (see Figures S2 and S3). For each experiment and for each trial, one transformant was randomly selected for further analysis. PCR fragments covering the mutated regions were sequenced; and in all six cases, the expected mutation/mRFP sequence was introduced without any other accompanying alterations at the target locus. Hence, Mad7 can be efficiently used for template-directed mutagenesis and gene insertion in an NHEJ-deficient A. nidulans strain.
3.3. Mad7 Can Be Used for Marker-Free Gene Deletion in NHEJ-Proficient A. oryzae and A. campestris
CRISPR experiments for specific genetic engineering are most efficiently conducted in NHEJ-deficient strains [15]. However, in many cases, only NHEJ-proficient strains may be available as a starting point. In these cases, and especially if the planned experimental work includes introduction of more than a few genetic alterations, it is advisable to invest time and create a mutation in the NHEJ pathway [38]. Cas9 has often been used to prepare NHEJ-deficient and wild-type strains for future CRISPR experiments [39] and we therefore tested whether Mad7 could also serve as a CRISPR nuclease for this purpose.
To investigate this possibility, we explored whether it would be possible to delete the ku70 gene in a pyrGΔ A. oryzae strain (ORY2) and in wild-type A. campestris using Mad7. Accordingly, and for each species, we constructed a Mad7-CRISPR vector encoding two gRNAs targeting the ku70 open reading frames close to the start and stop codons, pDIV707 and pDIV709 (Table S2).
Co-transformations of A. oryzae and A. campestris with the appropriate Mad7-CRISPR vector (pDIV707 or pDIV709) and gene-targeting substrate were performed at 30 °C. The gene-targeting substrates for deleting ku70 were either a linearized cassette from the digestion of pDIV708 with SwaI (A. campestris), or, a PCR-based gene-targeting substrate (A. oryzae), see Materials and Methods. These experiments produced three and five colonies respectively; and each colony was purified and tested by diagnostic PCR. These analyses identified two A. oryzae and one A. campestris colonies, which contained a ku70 deletion. Subsequent sequence analysis demonstrated that in all three cases gene deletion was performed by using the gene-targeting substrate as RT, as the 54 bp linker sequence had replaced the ku70 coding sequences. Hence, Mad7 can be used to introduce specific NHEJ mutations in NHEJ-proficient Aspergilli.
3.4. Site-Directed Mad7-Induced Gene Mutation in A. niger
Since many organisms preferably propagate at temperatures other than 37 °C, different temperatures for Mad7-based gene editing have been employed depending on the organism. For example, in zebrafish, genome editing with Mad7 required a heat-shock of 34 °C to efficiently perform its activity [40]. Moreover, Lin et al. [41] achieved promising results in Japonica rice (Oryza sativa) performing gene-editing events at 26 °C indicating that a broader temperature range can be applicable for Mad7 gene editing despite that it may not act with optimal activity. This is important, as many fungi often grow at temperatures lower than 37 °C. In a next step in our efforts to make a versatile Mad7-based gene-editing system, we therefore investigated whether A. niger, which prefers 30 °C, could be efficiently engineered by Mad7. Since the optimal temperatures for transformation of A. niger and Mad7 activity do not appear to be the same, we envisioned that gene-editing success-rates could be increased by applying a two-phase transformant recovery scheme, see Figure 3A. In this way, it is possible to use a different temperature and selection pressure during a first incubation phase, which favors Mad7 activity and where a low selection pressure is applied; and a subsequent phase, which favors the growth condition of A. niger and where a higher selection pressure is applied.
In a first attempt to investigate Mad7 activity in A. niger, we constructed a Mad7-CRISPR vector (pDIV313) designed to introduce mutations into albA in an NHEJ-proficient A. niger strain [15], NIG1, via flawed NHEJ repair of Mad7-induced DNA DSBs. In this assay, we exploit that albA gene encodes a polyketide synthase responsible for the formation of the characteristic black pigment of the conidia of A. niger [42] and mutant strains are therefore easily scored as they develop white conidia (Figure 3B). Using this setup, NIG1 was transformed in triplicate with either the empty CRISPR-Mad7 plasmid pDIV300 coding only for Mad7, or with the CRISPR-MAD7 plasmid pDIV313, which encodes a gRNA targeting the albA gene. The experiment was performed using the two-phase transformant recovery scheme outlined above (see also Materials and Methods for the protocol). Hence, in the first phase, two plating steps with increasing selection pressure are performed at either 30 °C (favoring A. niger growth) or 37 °C (favoring Mad7 activity). In the second phase, the plates were incubated at 30 °C to allow an optimal growth temperature for A. niger (Figure 3A).
As expected, transformation with pDIV300, using both 30 °C and 37 °C in the first phase, generated a large number of transformants as it only produces the Mad7 apoenzyme that cannot locate and cleave the target sequence. In contrast, co-transformation with pDIV313 encoding Mad7 and the albA gRNA, and using the same two temperatures through the first phase, produced only few transformants despite that similar amounts of DNA were used in the two experiments. These results indicate that the Mad7-albA gRNA complex efficiently cleaves the albA locus to reduce survival of the transformants. In agreement with this, most transformants produced white conidia indicating that mutations have been introduced into the albA locus due to Mad7-induced breaks followed by defective NHEJ repair. Lastly, by inspecting the transformants obtained using either 30 °C or 37 °C in the first phase, we noticed that the transformants obtained using 30 °C were often heterokaryons displaying a black/white phenotype, whereas those obtained using 37 °C were typically solid white or black, see Figure 3C. These results indicate that a more robust Mad7 activity is obtained by using 37 °C in the first incubation phase.
3.5. Mad7 Efficiently Mediates Template-Directed Mutagenesis and Gene Disruption in A. niger
Encouraged by the efficient Mad7-induced mutagenesis of albA in A. niger, we next investigated whether it would be possible to introduce template-directed mutations in albA in A. niger via selection-free gene-editing events. For this purpose, we chose the NHEJ-deficient strain, NIG96, which contains a deletion of kusA to prevent formation of transformants generated from NHEJ pathway.
We first investigated whether a single-stranded oligonucleotide could serve as a RT and therefore used to edit albA. Accordingly, we co-transformed A. niger in triplicates with pDIV313 and oligo PR_DIV3196 (see Table S1). Successful repair by the 90 nt oligonucleotide will introduce an XbaI site/amber stop codon into albA to generate white colonies (Figure 4A,B). After transformation, the protoplasts were plated according to the two-layer method using 37 °C in the two first incubation steps, and 30 °C for recovery and growth. In parallel, NIG96 was also transformed with the empty Mad7 CRISPR plasmid pDIV300. As expected for a robust cutting/repair reaction, the number of transformants were much higher in the presence of the oligonucleotide RT as compared to the numbers obtained in the absence of the oligonucleotide RT, see Figure 4C. In agreement with this, all transformants obtained in the presence of the oligonucleotide RT produced white conidia.
With the aim of inserting mRFP and disrupting albA, NIG96 was next co-transformed with pDIV313 and a PCR-based albA gene-targeting substrate containing mRFP flanked by 60 bp of up- and downstream albA sequences (Figure 4A). After transformation, we used the two-phase protocol using 37 °C and 30 °C for incubation in the first phase. In contrast to the control experiment where no transformants were achieved in the absence of a RT (Figure 4C), several transformants were obtained in the presence of the mRFP-PCR gene-targeting-substrate. In agreement with efficient Mad7-assisted gene targeting, all transformants emitted red fluorescent light. Two additional trials for each experiment were performed with similar results (see Figures S4 and S5). For each experiment and for each trial, one transformant was randomly selected for further analysis. PCR fragments covering the mutated regions were sequenced, and in all six cases, the expected mutation/mRFP sequence was introduced. Together, our data show that Mad7-induced DNA DSBs can be efficiently repaired by using single-stranded oligonucleotides and PCR fragments containing short targeting sequences to introduce desirable genome modifications in A. niger.
4. Conclusions
We have demonstrated that Mad7, an IP friendly CRISPR nuclease, can be used to perform gene editing in four different Aspergillus species: the genetic model fungus (A. nidulans), two industrial workhorses (A. niger and A. oryzae) and a true wild-type isolate (A. campestris). Hence, we envision that Mad7 can be broadly used to perform gene editing in fungi. A. niger was investigated in more detail as we used Mad7 to introduce several different types of gene edits such as unspecific and specific template-directed mutagenesis. For the latter, we demonstrated the efficient introduction of small mutations as well as gene insertion into the pigment gene albA via short targeting sequences. These observations open up promising avenues for cell factory construction using Mad7. Similarly, the fact the Mad7 was successfully used to engineer A. campestris, a species that has not previously been genetically engineered, suggests that Mad7 can also be used in future enzyme and secondary metabolite discovery endeavors.
Acknowledgments
We thank the HARMONIZE team for valuable discussions.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof9010016/s1, Table S1: List of primers; Table S2: List of plasmids; Figure S1: Primer design for construction of gRNA expression cassettes; Figure S2: Single-stranded oligonucleotide-mediated site-specific mutagenesis in A. nidulans; Figure S3: Mad7-induced gene insertion in A. nidulans; Figure S4: Single-stranded oligonucleotide-mediated site-specific mutagenesis in A. niger; Figure S5: Mad7-induced gene insertion in A. niger. [43,44,45,46] in Supplementary Materials.
Author Contributions
K.G.V. conceived the study. K.G.V., J.K.H.R., Z.D.J., M.V.d.C.B.C., M.M.-G., A.P.v.E. and F.J.C. designed and performed the experiments. K.G.V., Z.D.J. and U.H.M. analyzed the data. K.G.V., F.J.C. and U.H.M. wrote the paper. K.G.V., F.J.C. and U.H.M. supervised the project. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the Innovation Fund Denmark (Grant Numbers 6150-00031B.9, 0224-00121B) and CAPES–Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamentode Pessoal de Nível Superior (Process # 23079.032635/2019-86).
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Meyer V., Basenko E.Y., Benz J.P., Braus G.H., Caddick M.X., Csukai M., De Vries R.P., Endy D., Frisvad J.C., Gunde-Cimerman N., et al. Growing a circular economy with fungal biotechnology: A white paper. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2020;7:1–23. doi: 10.1186/s40694-020-00095-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Torres F.A.E., Zaccarim B.R., de Lencastre Novaes L.C., Jozala A.F., Santos C.A., Teixeira M.F.S., Ebinuma V.C.S. Natural colorants from filamentous fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016;100:2511–2521. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7274-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Martinez D., Berka R.M., Henrissat B., Saloheimo M., Arvas M., Baker S.E., Chapman J., Chertkov O., Coutinho P.M., Cullen D., et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of the biomass-degrading fungus Trichoderma reesei (syn. Hypocrea jecorina) Nat. Biotechnol. 2008;26:553–560. doi: 10.1038/nbt1403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vesth T.C., Nybo J.L., Theobald S., Frisvad J.C., Larsen T.O., Nielsen K.F., Hoof J.B., Brandl J., Salamov A., Riley R., et al. Investigation of inter- and intraspecies variation through genome sequencing of Aspergillus section Nigri. Nat. Genet. 2018;50:1688–1695. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0246-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Choque E., Klopp C., Valiere S., Raynal J., Mathieu F. Whole-genome sequencing of Aspergillus tubingensis G131 and overview of its secondary metabolism potential. BMC Genom. 2018;19:200. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4574-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schuster M., Kahmann R. CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing Approaches in Filamentous Fungi and Oomycetes. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2019;130:43–53. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2019.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ouedraogo J.P., Tsang A. CRISPR_Cas Systems for fungal research. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2020;34:189–201. doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2020.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Leisen T., Werner J., Pattar P., Safari N., Ymeri E., Sommer F., Schroda M., Suárez I., Collado I.G., Scheuring D., et al. Multiple knockout mutants reveal a high redundancy of phytotoxic compounds contributing to necrotrophic pathogenesis of Botrytis cinerea. PLOS Pathog. 2022;18:e1010367. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Huang J., Rowe D., Subedi P., Zhang W., Suelter T., Valent B., Cook D.E. CRISPR-Cas12a induced DNA double-strand breaks are repaired by multiple pathways with different mutation profiles in Magnaporthe oryzae. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:7168. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34736-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang Q., Coleman J.J. Progress and challenges: Development and implementation of CRISPR/Cas9 technology in filamentous fungi. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2019;17:761–769. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xue C., Greene E.C. DNA Repair pathway choices in CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing. Trends Genet. 2021;37:639–656. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2021.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nambiar T.S., Baudrier L., Billon P., Ciccia A. CRISPR-based genome editing through the lens of DNA repair. Mol. Cell. 2022;82:348–388. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.12.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Huang J., Cook D.E. The contribution of DNA repair pathways to genome editing and evolution in filamentous pathogens. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2022;1–21:fuac035. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuac035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nødvig C.S., Nielsen J.B., Kogle M.E., Mortensen U.H. A CRISPR-Cas9 system for genetic engineering of filamentous fungi. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0133085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nødvig C.S., Hoof J.B., Kogle M.E., Jarczynska Z.D., Lehmbeck J., Klitgaard D.K., Mortensen U.H. Efficient Oligo nucleotide mediated crispr-cas9 gene editing in Aspergilli. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2018;115:78–89. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ninomiya Y., Suzuki K., Ishii C., Inoue H. Highly efficient gene replacements in Neurospora strains deficient for nonhomologous end-joining. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:12248–12253. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402780101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Matsu-ura T., Baek M., Kwon J., Hong C. Efficient gene editing in Neurospora crassa with CRISPR technology. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2015;2:1–7. doi: 10.1186/s40694-015-0015-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pohl C., Kiel J.A., Driessen A.J., Bovenberg R.A., Nygård Y. CRISPR/Cas9 based genome editing of Penicillium chrysogenum. ACS Synth. Biol. 2016;5:754–764. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rojek J., Basavaraju Y., Nallapareddy S., Baumgartner R., Schoffelen S., Pedersen L. Mad7: An IP friendly CRISPR enzyme. Authorea Prepr. 2021:1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu Z., Schiel J.A., Maksimova E., Strezoska Ž., Zhao G., Anderson E.M., Wu Y., Warren J., Bartels A., Van Brabant Smith A., et al. ErCas12a CRISPR-MAD7 for model generation in human cells, mice, and rats. CRISPR J. 2020;3:97–108. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2019.0068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jarczynska Z.D., Rendsvig J.K.H., Pagels N., Viana V.R., Ndvig C.S., Kirchner F.H., Strucko T., Nielsen M.L., Mortensen U.H. DIVERSIFY: A fungal multispecies gene expression platform. ACS Synth. Biol. 2021;10:579–588. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gibson D.G., Young L., Chuang R.Y., Venter J.C., Hutchison C.A., Smith H.O. Enzymatic assembly of dna molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods. 2009;6:343–345. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jarczynska Z.D., Garcia Vanegas K., Deichmann M., Nørskov Jensen C., Scheeper M.J., Futyma M.E., Strucko T., Jares Contesini F., Sparholt Jørgensen T., Blæsbjerg Hoof J., et al. A versatile in vivo dna assembly toolbox for fungal strain engineering. ACS Synth. Biol. 2022;11:3251–3263. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.2c00159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jochumsen N., Muzzi-Erichsen G. Genome Editing by Guided Endonuclease and Single-Stranded Oligonucleotide. EP3874051A1. Patent. 2019
- 25.Horizon. [(accessed on 24 November 2022)]. Available online: https://horizondiscovery.com/en/gene-editing/gene-editing-reagents/mad7.
- 26.Nielsen J.B., Nielsen M.L., Mortensen U.H. Transient disruption of non-homologous end-joining facilitates targeted genome manipulations in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2008;45:165–170. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Machida M., Asai K., Sano M., Tanaka T., Kumagai T., Terai G., Kusumoto K., Arima T., Akita O., Kashiwagi Y., et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of Aspergillus oryzae. Nature. 2005;438:1–3. doi: 10.1038/nature04300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Varga J., Frisvad J.C., Samson R.A. Polyphasic taxonomy of Aspergillus Section Candidi based on molecular, morphological and physiological data. Stud. Mycol. 2007;59:75–88. doi: 10.3114/sim.2007.59.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nour-Eldin H.H., Geu-Flores F., Halkier B.A. USER cloning and USER fusion: The ideal cloning techniques for small and big laboratories. In: Fett-Neto A.G., editor. Plant Secondary Metabolism Engineering, Methods in Molecular Biology. 1st ed. Volume 1. Springer; Berlim, Germany: 2010. pp. 185–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vanegas K.G., Jarczynska Z.D., Strucko T., Mortensen U.H. Cpf1 Enables fast and efficient genome editing in Aspergilli. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2019;6:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s40694-019-0069-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kitamoto N., Matsui J., Kawai Y., Kato A., Yoshino S., Ohmiya K., Tsukagoshi N. Utilization of the TEF1-α gene (TEF1) promoter for expression of polygalacturonase genes, PgaA and PgaB, in Aspergillus oryzae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998;50:85–92. doi: 10.1007/s002530051260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tamano K., Bruno K.S., Karagiosis S.A., Culley D.E., Deng S., Collett J.R., Umemura M., Koike H., Baker S.E., Machida M. Increased production of fatty acids and triglycerides in Aspergillus oryzae by enhancing expressions of fatty acid synthesis-related genes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013;97:269–281. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4193-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jöchl C., Rederstorff M., Hertel J., Stadler P.F., Hofacker I.I., Schrettl M., Haas H., Hüttenhofer A. Small NcRNA Transcriptome analysis from Aspergillus fumigatus suggests a novel mechanism for regulation of protein synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:2677–2689. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Price M.A., Cruz R., Bryson J., Escalettes F., Rosser S.J. Expanding and understanding the CRISPR toolbox for Bacillus subtilis with MAD7 and dMAD7. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2020;117:1805–1816. doi: 10.1002/bit.27312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.O’Hara E.B., Timberlake W.E. Molecular characterization of the Aspergillus nidulans yA locus. Genetics. 1989;121:249–254. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.2.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yelton M.M., Timberlake W.E., Hondel C.A. A cosmid for selecting genes by complementation in Aspergillus nidulans: Selection of the developmentally regulated yA locus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1985;82:834–838. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.3.834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vanegas K.G., Lehka B.J., Mortensen U.H. SWITCH: A dynamic CRISPR tool for genome engineering and metabolic pathway control for cell factory construction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb. Cell Factories. 2017;16:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12934-017-0632-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hoof J.B., Nødvig C.S., Mortensen U.H. Genome Editing: CRISPR-Cas9. In: de Vries R.P., Tsang A., Grigoriev I.V., editors. Fungal Genomics: Methods and Protocols. 2nd ed. Volume 1775. Springer; Berlim, Germany: 2018. pp. 119–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Guo Y., Contesini F.J., Wang X., Ghidinelli S., Tornby D.S., Andersen T.E., Mortensen U.H., Larsen T.O. Biosynthesis of calipyridone a represents a fungal 2-pyridone formation without ring expansion in Aspergillus californicus. Org. Lett. 2022;24:804–808. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c03792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wierson W.A., Simone B.W., WareJoncas Z., Mann C., Welker J.M., Kar B., Emch M.J., Friedberg I., Gendron W.A.C., Barry M.A., et al. Expanding the CRISPR toolbox with ErCas12a in zebrafish and human cells. CRISPR J. 2019;2:417–433. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2019.0026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lin Q., Zhu Z., Liu G., Sun C., Lin D., Xue C., Li S., Zhang D., Gao C., Wang Y., et al. Genome editing in plants with MAD7 nuclease. J. Genet. Genom. 2021;48:444–451. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2021.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chiang Y.M., Meyer K.M., Praseuth M., Baker S.E., Bruno K.S., Wang C.C. Characterization of a polyketide synthase in Aspergillus niger whose product is a precursor for both dihydroxynaphthalene (DHN) melanin and naphtho-γ-pyrone. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2011;48:430–437. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rendsvig J.K.H. Ph.D. Thesis. Technical University of Denmark; Lyngby, Denmark: 2020. Filamentous Fungi for Protein Production and Identification of Superior Cell Factories—Genetic Tools and Expression Systems. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Smith C., Day P.J., Walker M.R. Generation of cohesive ends on PCR products by UDG-mediated excision of dU, and application for cloning into restriction digest-linearized vectors. Genome Res. 1993;2:328–332. doi: 10.1101/gr.2.4.328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jiang D., Hatahet Z., Melamede R.J., Kow Y.W., Wallace S.S. Characterization of Escherichia coli Endonuclease VIII. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:32230–32239. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.51.32230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Melamede R.J., Hatahet Z., Kow Y.W., Ide H., Wallace S.S. Isolation and Characterization of Endonuclease VIII from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 1994;33:1255–1264. doi: 10.1021/bi00171a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.