Skip to main content
Journal of Fungi logoLink to Journal of Fungi
. 2023 Jan 8;9(1):93. doi: 10.3390/jof9010093

Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Peniophora Sensu Lato (Russulales, Basidiomycota)

Yun-Lin Xu 1, Yan Tian 2, Shuang-Hui He 1,*
Editor: Yucheng Dai
PMCID: PMC9865865  PMID: 36675914

Abstract

Peniophora is an old corticioid genus, from which two small satellite genera, Dendrophora and Duportella, were derived based on morphological differences. Molecular systematic studies showed that they belong to Peniophoraceae, Russulales, but the inter- and intra-generic phylogenetic relationships are still unclear. Moreover, the species diversity of this group in subtropical and tropical Asia has not been sufficiently investigated and studied. In this study, we carried out an intensive taxonomic and phylogenetic study on Peniophora sensu lato based on analyses of concatenated ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 (ITS, Internal Transcribed Spacer) and 28S (D1–D2 domains of nuc 28S rDNA) sequence data of all available species worldwide. In the phylogenetic trees, species of Peniophora s. l. (sensu lato) including types of Peniophora s.s. (sensu stricto), Dendrophora and Duportella were interspersed within a strongly supported clade. It means that the morphological delimitations of the three genera are not reliable, and they should be regarded as a large genus. As a result, eight species of Duportella were transferred to Peniophora, although five of them have not been sequenced. Four new distinct lineages, corresponding to Peniophora cremicolor, P. major, P. shenghuae and P. vietnamensis spp. nov., were recovered in the trees. Peniophora taiwanensis is treated as a later synonym of P. malaiensis based on morphological and molecular evidence. Duportella renispora is excluded from Peniophoraceae, because BLAST results of the ITS and 28S sequences of the holotype showed that it is closely related to Amylostereum. Descriptions and illustrations are provided for the four new species, and an identification key is given for all 25 species of Peniophora in China. Our results indicated that the species diversity of the corticioid fungi in Asia is rich and deserves further study.

Keywords: corticioid fungi, Dendrophora, Duportella, Peniophoraceae, wood-decaying fungi

1. Introduction

The genus Peniophora Cooke (Peniophoraceae, Russulales) introduced in 1879, typified by Thelephora quercina Pers. ex Fr., is one of the oldest genera of corticioid fungi. It is a cosmopolitan genus with a wide distribution from boreal to tropical areas, causing a white rot on both angiosperms and gymnosperms. Species of the genus prefer to grow on small branches especially those dead but still attached ones in the exposed and dry environments. At the beginning, mycologists adopted a broad concept, and many unrelated species were described in the genus. It includes 639 names in Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp, accessed on 20 November 2022), but most species have been moved to other genera, and the morphological circumscription of Peniophora has been narrowed [1]. Meanwhile, some intra-generic taxa were proposed and used, and two satellite genera Duportella Pat. and Dendrophora (Parmasto) Chamuris were separated from Peniophora s.l. and accepted by many mycologists [2,3,4,5]. In the morphological monograph of Peniophoraceae [5], Andreasen and Hallenberg accepted 70 species of Peniophora s.s., 12 species of Duportella and 2 species of Dendrophora and provided keys and descriptions for all the genera and species.

According to the modern concept, Peniophora s.s. includes species possessing resupinate basidiomes with a smooth hymenophore, a monomitic hyphal system with simple-septate or nodose-septate generative hyphae, both encrusted cystidia and gloeocystidia, and thin-walled, smooth basidiospores negative in Melzer’s reagents. Dendrophora differs from Peniophora s.s. by having effused-reflexed basidiomes and the presence of brown, thick-walled dendrohyphidia, while Duportella differs by the presence of brown lamprocystidia and skeletal hyphae (in some species). However, there are usually morphological overlaps among the three genera. Based on the analyses of ITS sequences of Aphyllophorales, Boidin et al. [4] found that species of Peniophora s.l. formed a relatively strongly supported group that they named ‘Peniophorales’. Later, phylogenetic studies showed that Peniophora s.l. belongs to Peniophoraceae, Russulales [6,7,8]. Nevertheless, no comprehensive molecular studies have been carried out for Peniophora s.l., and the inter- and intra-generic phylogeny is not clear.

The ITS and 28S sequences of many species of Peniophora s.l. including some from type specimens were released in GenBank by Vu et al. [9] and thus made it possible to study the phylogeny of this group. In this paper, we studied the taxonomy and phylogeny of Peniophora s.l. by adding many sequence data of species from Asia, which was shown to be rich in the species diversity of this group [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. We aim to resolve the phylogenetic relationships among Peniophora s.s., Dendrophora and Duportella, and explore the species diversity in China. This research is a part of the studies of species diversity, taxonomy and phylogeny of corticioid fungi in China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Morphological Studies

Voucher specimens and strains are deposited at the herbaria of Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China (BJFC) and Centre for Forest Mycology Research, U.S. Forest Service, Madison, Wisconsin, USA (CFMR). Freehand sections were made from dried basidiomes and mounted in 2% (w/v) potassium hydroxide (KOH) with 1% (w/v) phloxine, Melzer’s reagent (IKI) or cotton blue (CB). Microscopic examinations were carried out with a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at magnifications up to 1000×. Drawings were made with the aid of a drawing tube. The following abbreviations are used: L = mean spore length, W = mean spore width, Q = L/W ratio, n (a/b) = number of spores (a) measured from number of specimens (b). Color codes and terms follow Kornerup and Wanscher [17].

2.2. DNA Extraction and Sequencing

A CTAB plant genomic DNA extraction Kit DN14 (Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was used to extract total genomic DNA from dried specimens which were then amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region was amplified with the primer pair ITS5/ITS4 [18] using the following protocol: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 4 min, followed by 34 cycles at 94 °C for 40 s, 58 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 1 min, and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The 28S D1-D2 region was amplified with the primer pair LR0R/LR7 [19] employing the following procedure: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, followed by 34 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1.5 min, and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. DNA sequencing was performed at Beijing Genomics Institute, and the newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1). BioEdit v.7.0.5.3 [20] was used to review the chromatograms and for contig assembly.

2.3. Phylogenetic Analyses

The molecular phylogenetic analyses were inferred from two separate concatenated ITS-28S sequences datasets of species in the Peniophoraceae and Peniophora s.l., respectively. Amylostereum chailletii (Pers.) Boidin was elected as the outgroup for the Peniophoraceae dataset, whilst Confertobasidium olivaceoalbum (Bourdot & Galzin) Jülich and Metulodontia nivea (P. Karst.) Parmasto were used for the Peniophora s.l. dataset. The ITS and 28S sequences were aligned separately using MAFFT v.7 [21] with the G-INS-I iterative refinement algorithm and optimized manually in BioEdit v.7.0.5.3. The separate alignments were then concatenated using Mesquite v.3.5.1 [22].

Maximum parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML) analyses and Bayesian inference (BI) were carried out by using PAUP* v.4.0b10 [23], RAxML v.8.2.10 [24] and MrBayes 3.2.6 [25], respectively. In MP analysis, trees were generated using 100 replicates of the random stepwise addition of sequence and tree-bisection reconnection (TBR) branch-swapping algorithm with all characters given equal weight. Branch supports for all parsimony analyses were estimated by performing 1000 bootstrap replicates with a heuristic search of 10 random-addition replicates for each bootstrap replicate. In ML analysis, statistical support values were obtained using rapid bootstrapping with 1000 replicates, with default settings used for other parameters. For BI, the best-fit substitution model was estimated with jModeltest v.2.17 [26]. Four Markov chains were run for 0.3 and 20 million generations for the Peniophoraceae and Peniophora s.l. datasets, respectively, until the split deviation frequency values were lower than 0.01. Trees were sampled every 100 generations. The first quarter of the trees, which represented the burn-in phase of the analyses, were discarded, and the remaining trees were used to calculate posterior probabilities (BPP) in the majority rule consensus tree.

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analyses

Thirty-nine ITS and 39 28S sequences were newly generated in this study (Table 1). The Peniophoraceae dataset contained 33 ITS and 34 28S sequences from 34 samples representing 13 genera and the outgroup, and it had an aligned length of 2313 characters, of which 544 were parsimony-informative. MP analysis yielded 5000 equally parsimonious trees (TL = 2605, CI = 0.528, RI = 0.568, RC = 0.300, HI = 0.472). The Peniophora s.l. dataset contained 113 ITS and 97 28S sequences from 114 samples representing 63 taxa and the outgroup, and it had an aligned length of 1993 characters, of which 350 were parsimony-informative. MP analysis yielded 5000 equally parsimonious trees (TL = 1973, CI = 0.372, RI = 0.698, RC = 0.260, HI = 0.628). The jModelTest suggested GTR+I+G as the best-fit model of nucleotide evolution for both Peniophoraceae and Peniophora s.l. datasets. The average standard deviation of split frequencies of BI was 0.004389 (for the Peniophoraceae dataset) and 0.004179 (for the Peniophora s.l. dataset) at the end of the run. ML and BI analyses resulted in almost identical tree topologies compared to the MP analysis. The MP trees of Penophoraceae and Peniophora s.l. are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively, with the parsimony bootstrap values (≥50%, front), likelihood bootstrap values (≥50%, middle) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥0.95, back) labeled along the branches.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree obtained from maximum parsimony analysis of ITS-28S sequence data of Peniophoraceae. Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap values (≥50%, front), likelihood bootstrap values (≥50%, middle) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥0.95, back). New species and new combinations are set in bold.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Phylogenetic tree obtained from maximum parsimony analysis of ITS-28S sequence data of Peniophora s.l. Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap values (≥50%, front), likelihood bootstrap values (≥50%, middle) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥0.95, back). New species (purple) and new combinations (blue) are set in bold.

Table 1.

Species and sequences used in the phylogenetic analyses. New species are set in bold with type specimens indicated with an asterisk (*).

Taxa Voucher Locality ITS 28S Reference
Amylostereum chailletii NH8031/1035 Romania AF506406 AF506406 [6]
Asterostroma laxum EL33-99 Estonia AF506410 AF506410 [6]
A. muscicola KHL9537 Puerto Rico AF506409 AF506409 [6]
Baltazaria eurasiaticogalactina CBS666.84 France AY293211 [27]
B. octopodites FLOR 56449 Brazil MH260025 MH260047 [28]
Confertobasidium olivaceoalbum FP90196 USA AF511648 AF511648 [6]
Dichostereum effuscatum GG930915 France AF506390 AF506390 [6]
D. pallescens NH7046/673 Canada AF506392 AF506392 [6]
Gloiothele lactescens EL8-98 Sweden AF506453 AF506453 [6]
G. lamellosa KHL11031 Venezuela AF506454 AF506454 [6]
Lachnocladium schweinfurthianum KM 49740 Cameroon MH260033 MH260051 [28]
L. sp. KHL10556 Jamaica AF506461 AF506461 [6]
Metulodontia nivea NH13108/2712 Russia AF506423 AF506423 [6]
Peniophora albobadia CBS329.66 France MH858809 MH870448 [9]
P. albobadia He2159 USA MK588755 MK588795 Present study
P. aurantiaca UBCF:19732 HQ604854 HQ604854
P. aurantiaca CBS396.50 France MH856678 MH868195 [9]
P. bicornis He3609 China MK588763 MK588803 Present study
P. bicornis He4767 China MK588764 MK588804 Present study
P. borbonica He4606 China MK588765 MK588805 Present study
P. borbonica He4597 China MK588766 MK588806 Present study
P. cinerea NH9808/1788 Spain AF506424 AF506424 [6]
P. cinerea CBS261.37 Belgium MH855905 MH867412 [9]
P. cinerea He3725 China MK588769 MK588809 Present study
P. crassitunicata CBS663.91 Reunion MH862292 MH873972 [9]
P. crassitunicata He3814 China MK588770 MK588810 Present study
P. cremicolor He5380 * China MK588791 MK588831 Present study
P. duplex TPDuB1022 AF119519 [29]
P. duplex CBS286.58 Canada MH857787 MH869321 [9]
P. erikssonii CBS287.58 France MH857788 MH869322 [9]
P. erikssonii Cui11871 China MK588771 MK588811 Present study
P. exima T-523 USA MK588772 MK588812 Present study
P. fasticata CBS942.96 Ethiopia MH862624 [9]
P. fissilis CBS681.91 Reunion MH862298 MH873975 [9]
P. fissilis CBS684.91 Mascarene Islands MH862299 MH873976 [9]
P. gilbertsonii CBS357.95 USA MH862528 MH874164 [9]
P. gilbertsonii CBS360.95 USA MH862530 MH874165 [9]
P. guadelupensis CBS715.91 Guadeloupe MH862304 MH873977 [9]
P. halimi CBS863.84 France MH861844 MH873532 [9]
P. halimi CBS864.84 France MH861845 MH873533 [9]
P. incarnata NH10271/1909 Danmark AF506425 AF506425 [6]
P. incarnata CBS399.50 France MH856681 MH868198 [9]
P. junipericola CBS349.54 Sweden MH857354 [9]
P. junipericola He2462 China MK588773 MK588813 Present study
P. kuehneri CBS719.91 Mascarene Islands MH862307 MH873980 [9]
P. kuehneri He4745 China MK588757 MK588797 Present study
P. kuehneroides CBS731.91 Mascarene Islands MH862317 MH873989 [9]
P. kuehneroides CBS732.91 Mascarene Islands MH862318 MH873990 [9]
P. laete CBS256.56 France MH857617 MH869165 [9]
P. laete FCUG 2681 Russia GU322869 [30]
P. lassa SP6129 Russia KJ509191 [31]
P. lassa He3052 China MK588758 MK588798 Present study
P. lassa Dai17081A China MK588759 MK588799 Present study
P. laurentii CBS325.73 Norway MH872397 [9]
P. laxitexta BAFC 3309 Argentina FJ882040 [32]
P. laxitexta LGMF1159 Brazil JX559580 [33]
P. lilacea CBS337.66 Armenia MH858813 MH870452 [9]
P. limitata olrim963 Lithuania AY787678 [34]
P. lycii CBS264.56 France MH857624 MH869169 [9]
P. lycii Boid-437 France MK588774 MK588814 Present study
P. major He5528 * China MK588792 MK588832 Present study
P. malaiensis CBS679.91 Singapore MH862297 MH873974 [9]
P. manshurica He2956 China MK588776 MK588816 Present study
P. manshurica He3729 China MK588777 MK588817 Present study
P. meridionalis CBS289.58 France MH857789 MH869323 [9]
P. molesta CBS677.91 Gabon MH862295 [9]
P. molesta CBS676.91 Gabon MH862294 MH873973 [9]
P. monticola CBS649.91 Reunion MH862289 MH873970 [9]
P. nuda He5280 China MK588778 MK588818 Present study
P. nuda HHB-4916-Sp USA MK588779 MK588819 Present study
P. ovalispora CBS653.91 Mascarene Islands MH862290 MH873971 [9]
P. parvocystidiata CBS716.91 Guadeloupe MH862305 MH873978 [9]
P. piceae olrim10 Sweden AY781264 [35]
P. piceae 209 Russia JX507718 [36]
P. pilatiana CBS265.56 France MH857625 MH869170 [9]
P. pilatiana CBS-A1/A2 MK588780 MK588820 Present study
P. pini Hjm 18143 Sweden EU118651 EU118651 [7]
P. pini CBS274.56 France MH857632 MH869177 [9]
P. pithya CBS277.56 France MH857635 MH869180 [9]
P. pithya He3107 China MK588781 MK588821 Present study
P. polygonia CBS404.50 France MH856684 MH868201 [9]
P. polygonia He4651 China MK588782 MK588822 Present study
P. proxima CBS405.50 France MH856685 MH868202 [9]
P. proxima He5498 China MK588783 MK588823 Present study
P. pseudopini TPPpB1007 AF119514 [29]
P. pseudopini DAOM-30124-Sp Canada MK588784 MK588824 Present study
P. pseudoversicolor CBS338.66 France MH858814 MH870453 [9]
P. pseudoversicolor He5132 China MK588785 MK588825 Present study
P. quercina CBS407.50 France MH856687 MH868204 [9]
P. quercina CBS408.50 France MH856688 MH868205 [9]
P. reidii CBS397.83 France MH861616 MH873334 [9]
P. rhoica CBS943.96 Ethiopia MH862625 MH874246 [9]
P. roseoalba CLZhao3513 China ON786559 OP380690 [16]
P. roseoalba CLZhao9401 China ON786560 [16]
P. roseoalba He5031 China OP872571 OP872575 Present study
P. rufa CBS351.59 Canada MH857891 MH869432 [9]
P. rufa He2788 China MK588786 MK588826 Present study
P. rufomarginata CBS281.56 France MH857639 MH869183 [9]
P. rufomarginata CBS282.56 France MH857640 MH869184 [9]
P. septentrionalis CBS294.58 Canada MH857791 MH869325 [9]
P. shenghuae He3507 * China MK588788 MK588828 Present study
P. shenghuae He3535 China MK588789 MK588829 Present study
P. shenghuae He5447 China MK588790 MK588830 Present study
P. simulans CBS874.84 France MH861849 MH873537 [9]
P. simulans CBS875.84 France MH861850 MH873538 [9]
P. sphaerocystidiata HHB-8827-Sp USA MK588787 MK588827 Present study
P. subsalmonea CBS696.91 Mascarene Islands MH862302 [9]
P. subsalmonea CBS697.91 Mascarene Islands MH862303 [9]
P. taiwanensis He4870 China MK588775 MK588815 Present study
P. taiwanensis Wu 9206-28 China MK588793 MK588833 Present study
P. taiwanensis Wu 9209-14 China MK588794 MK588834 Present study
P. tamaricicola CBS438.62 Morocco MH858203 MH869802 [9]
P. tamaricicola CBS439.62 Morocco MH858204 MH869803 [9]
P. trigonosperma CBS402.83 France MH861618 MH873335 [9]
P. trigonosperma He3602 China MK588762 MK588802 Present study
P. tristicula CBS210.63 Pakistan MH858266 [9]
P. tristicula He4775 China MH669235 MH669239 [37]
P. versicolor CBS358.61 Morocco MH858082 MH869651 [9]
P. versiformis CBS358.54 France MH857360 MH868902 [9]
P. versiformis He3029 China MK588756 MK588796 Present study
P. vietnamensis He5242 Vietnam MK588760 MK588800 Present study
P. vietnamensis He5252 * Vietnam MK588761 MK588801 Present study
P. violaceolivida CBS348.52 France MH857077 MH868613 [9]
P. yunnanensi CLZhao3978 China OP380617 OP380689 [16]
P. yunnanensi CLZhao7347 China OP380616 [16]
Scytinostroma jacksonii NH6626/635 Canada AF506467 AF506467 [6]
S. portentosum EL11-99 Sweden AF506470 AF506470 [6]
S. renisporum CBS770.86 Indonesia MH862050 MH873737 [9]
Vararia investiens TAA164122 Norway AF506484 AF506484 [6]
V. ochroleuca JS24400 Norway AF506485 AF506485 [6]
Vesiculomyces citrinus EL53-97 Sweden AF506486 AF506486 [6]

In the trees, species of Peniophora s.l. including the type species of Peniophora s.s., Dendrophora and Duportella formed a strongly supported clade (95/95/1 in Figure 1, 100/100/1 in Figure 2). Four distinct lineages corresponding to Peniophora cremicolor, P. major, P. shenghuae and P. vietnamensis spp. nov. were recovered. For other sequences generated in this study, they formed distinct lineages alone or together with sequences from GenBank and represented known species.

3.2. Taxonomy

Peniophora Cooke, Grevillea 8 (no. 45): 20, 1879, emended

Basidiomes annual or perennial, resupinate, effused or effused-reflexed, adnate or sometimes loosening with age, membranaceous, ceraceous or coriaceous, usually stratified in section. Reflexed parts narrow, velutinous, felty to tomentose. Hymenophore smooth or tuberculate, rarely raduloid or merulioid, reddish, orange, pink, violaceous, gray, cream-colored, ochraceous, brown to dark brown; margin indistinct to fibrillose, adnate or slightly elevated, usually curved inside in reflexed parts when dry and old, concolorous or darker than hymenophore surface. Hyphal system monomitic or dimitic. Skeletal hyphae thick-walled, yellowish brown, dominated in the subiculum. Generative hyphae colorless to yellowish brown, thin- to thick-walled, with or without clamps. Dendrohyphidia present in some species, colorless or brown, thin- or thick-walled. Lamprocystidia present in most species, subulate or subcylindrical, colorless to brown, mostly thick-walled, encrusted with crystals. Gloeocystidia present or not, fusiform, subclavate to subcylindrical, colorless, thin- to thick-walled, empty or with contents. Basidia clavate to subcylindrical, sometimes flexuous, thin- to slightly thick-walled, with (2–) 4 sterigmata. Basidiospores colorless, usually cylindrical, allantoid or ellipsoid, rarely ovoid, subglobose, lacrimoid, pyriform or triangular, thin-walled, smooth, inamyloid, acyanophilous, spore print mostly pink.

Notes—According to the phylogenetic analyses, the morphological characters used to delimit the three genera, Peniophora s.s., Dendrophora and Duportella, are not reliable. Thus, we propose to use a broad concept for Peniophora, which includes taxa possessing resupinate to effused-reflexed basidiomes with a bright or dull hymenophore surface, a monomitic or dimitic hyphal system with simple-septate or clamped generative hyphae, colorless or brown lamprocystidia and differently shaped basidiospores. However, we believe that the simultaneous presences of lamprocystidia and gloeocystidia, and the inamyloid basidiospores can be regarded as the synapomorphic traits for Peniophora in Russulales.

Peniophora cremicolor Y.L. Xu, Y. Tian & S.H. He, sp. nov. Figure 3

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Peniophora cremicolor ((a) from paratype BJFC 026446; (b–f) from the holotype BJFC 026441). Scale bars: (a) = 1 cm; (bf) = 10 µm. (a). Basidiomes; (b). Basidiospores; (c). Basidia and a basidiole; (d). Gloeocystidia; (e). Lamprocystidia; (f). Hyphae from subiculum.

MycoBank: MB846853

Type—CHINA, Fujian Province, Wuyishan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, on dead but still attached branch of angiosperm tree, 6 April 2018, He 5380 (BJFC 026441, holotype).

Etymology—refers to the species having the cream color of the dried basidiomes.

Fruiting body—Basidiomes annual, resupinate, effused, adnate or slightly detached from substrate with age, membranaceous to coriaceous, first as small colonies, later confluent up to 20 cm long, 2 cm wide, 200 µm thick in section. Hymenophore smooth, orange yellow [4B(7–8)] when fresh, cream [4A3] to grayish yellow [4B3] after dry, not cracked, unchanged in KOH; margin thinning out, fimbriate and white when juvenile, becoming indistinct and concolorous with hymenophore surface when mature.

Microscopic structures—Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae simple-septate. Subiculum well-developed, colorless, with a compact texture; hyphae colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, rarely branched, moderately septate, agglutinated, more or less parallel to substrate, 2–4 µm in diam. Subhymenium thickening with age, composed of lamprocystidia, hyphae and collapsed hymenial elements; hyphae colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, agglutinated, interwoven, 2–3.5 µm in diam. Lamprocystidia numerous, metuloid, subulate, colorless, thick-walled, heavily encrusted with crystals in the middle and upper parts, embedded, with a basal simple septum, 32–70 × 6–12 μm (with encrustations). Gloeocystidia subcylindrical to subclavate, usually with one or two contractions, empty or sometimes with contents, colorless, slightly thick-walled in most parts, slightly thickening toward the base, with a basal simple septum, smooth, 50–80 × 7–12 μm. Basidia clavate, colorless, slightly thick-walled, with a basal simple septum and four sterigmata, usually projecting beyond the hymenium, 45–65 × 8–12 μm; basidioles numerous, in shape similar to basidia but slightly smaller. Basidiospores ellipsoid to broadly ellipsoid, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, bearing a distinct apiculus, inamyloid, acyanophilous, 9–13 × 6–7 µm, L = 11.3 µm, W = 6.3 µm, Q = 1.8 (n = 60/2).

Additional specimen examined—CHINA, Fujian Province, Wuyishan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, on dead but still attached branch of angiosperm tree, 6 April 2018, He 5385 (BJFC 026446).

Notes—Peniophora cremicolor is characterized by the cream-colored basidiomes, simple-septate generative hyphae, numerous lamprocystidia and gloeocystidia, large ellipsoid to broadly ellipsoid basidiospores. In the phylogenetic tree (Figure 2), P. cremicolor formed a distinct lineage sister to P. fasticata Boidin & Lanq., P. subsalmonea Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles and P. rhoica, all of which have cylindrical to allantoid basidiospores [5]. Morphologically, P. erikssonii Boidin is similar to P. cremicolor by having orange yellow basidiomes, simple-septate generative hyphae and ellipsoid basidiospores, but differs in having larger lamprocystidia (50–110 × 8–15 µm), gloeocystidia (70–140 × 10–15 µm) and basidiospores (13–20 × 8–13 µm) [5]. Peniophora proxima Bres. is similar to P. cremicolor by sharing same size of basidiospores but differs in having clamped generative hyphae and smaller lamprocystidia (15–40 × 5–7 µm) [38].

Peniophora major Y.L. Xu, Y. Tian & S.H. He, sp. nov. Figure 4

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Peniophora major (from the holotype BJFC 026589). Scale bars: (a) = 1 cm; (be) = 10 µm. (a). Basidiomes; (b). Basidiospores; (c). Basidia and a basidiole; (d). Gloeocystidia; (e). Lamprocystidia.

MycoBank: MB846854

Type—CHINA, Guizhou Province, Jiangkou County, Fanjingshan Nature Reserve, on dead angiosperm branch, 11 July 2018, He 5528 (BJFC 026589, holotype).

Etymology—refers to the species having large lamprocystidia, gloeocystidia and basidiospores.

Fruiting body—Basidiomes annual, resupinate, effused, closely adnate, inseparable from substrate, coriaceous, up to 35 cm long, 3 cm wide, 350 µm thick in section. Hymenophore smooth, pale orange [6A3], orange grey [6B2] to grayish orange [6B(3–4)], not cracked, unchanged in KOH; margin thinning out, indistinct, concolorous with hymenophore surface.

Microscopic structures—Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae simple-septate. Subiculum thin, yellowish brown, with a compact texture; hyphae colorless to pale yellow, thick-walled, smooth, moderately septate, rarely branched, densely agglutinated, more or less parallel to substrate, 3–5 µm in diam. Subhymenium thickening, composed of lamprocystidia, hyphae and collapsed hymenial elements; hyphae colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, agglutinated, interwoven, 2–4 µm in diam. Lamprocystidia numerous, metuloid, subulate, colorless or pale yellow at base with age, thick-walled, heavily encrusted with crystals in the middle and upper parts, embedded or projecting beyond the hymenium, with a basal simple septum, 40–105 × 11–16 μm (with encrustations). Gloeocystidia subclavate to subcylindrical, colorless, slightly thick-walled, smooth, often with contents, with a basal simple septum, 40–85 × 7–10 μm. Basidia subclavate, usually with a contraction in the upper part, colorless, slightly thick-walled, with a basal simple septum and four sterigmata, 35–50 × 8–9 μm; basidioles numerous, in shape similar to basidia but slightly smaller. Basidiospores cylindrical, usually slightly concaved in one side, bearing a distinct apiculus, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, inamyloid, acyanophilous, 10–14 × 4.8–6 µm, L = 12.2 µm, W = 5.1 µm, Q = 2.4 (n = 30/1).

Notes—Peniophora major is characterized by the grayish basidiomes, simple-septate generative hyphae, and large lamprocystidia, gloeocystidia and basidiospores. In the phylogenetic tree (Figure 2), P. major formed a sister lineage to P. limitata (Chaillet ex Fr.) Cooke, but their relationship was not well-supported. Morphologically, P. limitata differs from P. major by clamped generative hyphae, the absence of gloeocystidia, and smaller lamprocystidia (25–60 × 8–12 µm) and basidiospores (7.5–12 × 2.5–3.5 µm) [5]. Peniophora coprosmae G. Cunn. from Australia and New Zealand is similar to P. major by sharing distinct gloeocystidia and large cylindrical basidiospores, but it differs in having clamped generative hyphae, slightly shorter lamprocystidia (35–80 µm long) and slightly smaller basidiospores (9–11.5 × 4–5 µm) [5].

Peniophora shenghuae Y.L. Xu, Y. Tian & S.H. He, sp. nov. Figure 5

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Peniophora shenghuae (from the holotype BJFC 021904). Scale bars: (a) = 1 cm; (bf) = 10 µm. (a). Basidiomes; (b). Basidiospores; (c). Basidia and a basidiole; (d). Gloeocystidia; (e). Lamprocystidia; (f). Hyphae from subiculum.

MycoBank: MB846855

Type—CHINA, Yunnan Province, Luquan County, Zhuanlong Town, on dead angiosperm branch, 4 December 2015, He 3507 (BJFC 021904, holotype).

Etymology—Named to honor Dr. Sheng-Hua Wu (National Museum of Natural Science, Taiwan) who contributed to the taxonomy of Peniophora s.l. and other corticioid fungi in Taiwan.

Fruiting body—Basidiomes annual, resupinate, effused, closely adnate, coriaceous, first as small colonies, later confluent up to 9 cm long, 3 cm wide, 200 µm thick in section. Hymenophore smooth, pale orange [5A3], orange gray [5B2] to brownish orange [5C (3–6)], not cracked or with scattered crevices when dry, slightly darkening in KOH; margin thinning out, indistinct, usually darker than hymenophore surface, brown.

Microscopic structures—Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae simple-septate. Subiculum yellowish brown, with a compact texture, up to 60 µm thick; hyphae colorless to pale yellow, thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, rarely branched, moderately septate, interwoven, densely agglutinated, 2–4 µm in diam. Subhymenium thickening, composed of lamprocystidia, hyphae and collapsed hymenial elements; hyphae colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, tightly interwoven, 2–3 µm in diam. Lamprocystidia abundant, subulate, colorless, thick-walled, heavily encrusted with crystals in most parts, mostly embedded or slightly projecting beyond the hymenium, with a basal simple septum, 20–60 × 8–16 μm (with encrustations). Gloeocystidia fusiform, usually with a small apical papilla, flexuous, colorless, slightly thick-walled, smooth, empty or with content, 28–50 × 5–8 μm. Basidia subclavate to subcylindrical, usually with several contractions, flexuous, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, with a basal simple septum and four sterigmata, 24–45 × 5–7 μm; basidioles numerous, in shape similar to basidia but slightly smaller. Basidiospores cylindrical, bearing a distinct apiculus, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, inamyloid, acyanophilous, 7.5–10 (–10.5) × 3–4 µm, L = 9.1 µm, W = 3.3 µm, Q = 2.8 (n = 30/1).

Additional specimens examined—CHINA, Yunnan Province, Luquan County, Zhuanlong Town, on dead angiosperm branch, 4 December 2015, He 3506 (BJFC 021903) & He 3535 (BJFC 021933); Guizhou Province, Chishui County, Suoluo Nature Reserve, on dead liana, 7 July 2018, He 5447 (BJFC 026508).

Notes—Peniophora shenghuae is characterized by the grayish orange basidiomes, simple-septate generative hyphae, numerous strongly encrusted lamprocystidia, papillated gloeocystidia and cylindrical basidiospores. In the phylogenetic tree (Figure 2), P. shenghuae formed a strongly supported lineage with P. reidii Boidin & Lanq. Meanwhile, morphologically, P. reidii is similar to P. shenghuae by sharing simple-septate generative hyphae, papillated gloeocystidia and same size, cylindrical basidiospores. However, P. reidii has thicker basidiomes (up to 0.6 mm) and wider, sometimes bifurcate lamprocystidia (12–20 μm wide) [5]. The occurrence of P. reidii in Taiwan needs to be confirmed [11]. Peniophora borbonica Boidin & Gilles is similar to P. shenghuae by sharing simple-septate generative hyphae, fusiform gloeocystidia and cylindrical basidiospores, but it differs in having thicker basidiomes (up to 1.2 mm thick), slightly thick-walled basidia and slightly slender basidiospores (2.7–3.5 μm wide) [5]. Two specimens collected from Taiwan were identified as P. borbonica by us, which formed a distinct lineage distantly related to the lineage of P. shenghuae and P. reidii (Figure 2).

Peniophora vietnamensis Y.L. Xu, Y. Tian & S.H. He, sp. nov. Figure 6

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Peniophora vietnamensis ((a,cg) from the holotype BJFC 024770; (b) from the paratype BJFC 024760). Scale bars: (b,c) = 1 cm; (dg) = 10 µm. (ac). Basidiomes; (d). Basidiospores; (e). Basidia and basidioles; (f). Gloeocystidia; (g). Lamprocystidia.

MycoBank: MB846856

Type—VIETNAM, Lam Dong Province, Bi Doup Nui Ba National Park, on dead Araceae plant, 15 October 2017, He 5252 (BJFC 024770, holotype).

Etymology—refers to the species being found in Vietnam.

Fruiting body—Basidiomes annual, resupinate, effused, closely adnate, first as small colonies, later confluent up to 9 cm long, 1 cm wide, 260 µm thick in section. Hymenophore smooth, brownish orange [6C(5–7)] to light brown [6D(6–8)], not cracked or finely cracked with age, turning reddish brown in KOH; margin thinning out, indistinct, concolorous or darker than hymenophore surface.

Microscopic structures—Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae simple-septate. Subiculum indistinct or absent; hyphae colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, rarely branched, moderately septate, interwoven, 2–3 µm in diam. Subhymenium thickening, with numerous lamprocystidia; hyphae colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, interwoven, 1.5–2.5 µm in diam. Lamprocystidia numerous, subulate, usually bifurcate, with one or two secondary septa, yellowish brown, distinctly thick-walled, slightly encrusted with fine crystals in the apex, embedded or slightly projecting beyond the hymenium, 25–40 × 5–10 μm. Gloeocystidia subulate, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, usually with one secondary septum, usually empty in the apical part, with contents in the basal part, 28–50 × 5–8 μm. Basidia subclavate, with a contraction in the middle part, colorless, thin-walled, with a basal simple septum and four sterigmata, 23–32 × 6–10 μm; basidioles numerous, in shape similar to basidia but slightly smaller. Basidiospores oblong cylindrical, colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, inamyloid, cyanophilous when thick-walled, 12–16.5 (–17) × 4–6 µm, L = 14.5 µm, W = 4.5 µm, Q = 3.2–3.3 (n = 60/2).

Additional specimen examined—VIETNAM, Lam Dong Province, Bi Doup Nui Ba National Park, on dead Araceae plant, 15 October 2017, He 5242 (BJFC 024760).

Notes—Peniophora vietnamensis is characterized by its brownish orange basidiomes on Araceae plant, simple-septate generative hyphae, brown lamprocystidia, subulate gloeocystidia and oblong cylindrical basidiospores. In the phylogenetic trees (Figure 1 and Figure 2), P. vietnamensis and P. trigonosperma Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles formed a strongly supported lineage. Both species grow on palm trees and have similar brown lamprocystidia, however, P. trigonosperma differs in having clamped hyphae, cylindrical to fusiform gloeocystidia and triangular basidiospores [5]. Duportella rhoica Boidin & Lanq. is similar to P. vietnamensis by sharing oblong cylindrical basidiospores (10–14.5 × 4–6 µm) but differs in having a dimitic hyphal system with skeletoid hyphae and clamped generative hyphae and larger fusiform gloeocystidia (60–90 × 5–12 µm) [5].

Peniophora globispora Y.L. Xu & S.H. He, nom. & comb. nov.

MycoBank: MB846863

Duportella sphaerospora G. Cunn., Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand 85: 96 (1957).

Notes—Duportella sphaerospora is characterized by the large globose to subglobose basidiospores (10–12 × 9–12 µm) [5]. Since the epithet ‘sphaerospora’ was used in Peniophora for another species (P. sphaerospora Höhn. & Litsch. = Hypochnicium sphaerosporum (Höhn. & Litsch.) J. Erikss.), we propose the new name and new combination, Peniophora globispora, for this species.

Peniophora jordaoensis (Hjortstam & Ryvarden) Y.L. Xu & S.H. He, comb. nov.

MycoBank: MB846857

Duportella jordaoensis Hjortstam & Ryvarden, Synopsis Fungorum 18: 20 (2004).

Notes—The species was originally described from Sao Paulo, Brazil, and it is known only from the type locality so far. Although sequences of the species are unavailable at present, morphologically, it has typical characteristics of Peniophora, such as the presence of both gloeocystidia and lamprocystidia, and suballantoid to allantoid basidiospores [39]. Meanwhile, the felted subiculum and brownish metuloid cystidia of the species can be seen in other species of Peniophora.

Peniophora kuehneroides (Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles) Y.L. Xu & S.H. He, comb. nov.

MycoBank: MB846858

Duportella kuehneroides Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles, Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 107 (3): 98 (1991).

Notes—Two strains (CBS 731.91 and CBS 732.91) of Duportella kuehneroides from Mascarene Islands isolated and identified by Paule Lanquetin formed a distinct lineage in the large clade of Peniophora (Figure 1 and Figure 2). We propose the new combination based on both morphological and molecular evidence [5].

Peniophoralassa (Spirin & Kout) Y.L. Xu & S.H. He, comb. nov.

MycoBank: MB846859

Duportella lassa Spirin & Kout, Mycotaxon 130 (2): 484 (2015).

Notes—The species was recently described from northeast Russia [31]. A specimen from northeast China (He 3052) and the holotype of the species (Spirin 6129) formed a strongly supported lineage sister to other species of Peniophora. The close relationship between Duportella lassa and Peniophora was also noticed by Spirin and Kout [31]. Peniophora lassa is a common species in the Beijing area according to the authors’ investigations carried out recently.

Specimens examined—CHINA, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Genhe County, Greater Khingan Mountains Nature Reserve, on trunk of Salix, 17 October 2015, He 3052 (BJFC 021442); Beijing, Mentougou District, Tanzhe Temple Park, on dead branch of Syringa, 17 July 2020, He 6511 (BJFC 033459); Jietai Temple Park, on dead branch of Lonicera, 7 August 2020, He 6735 (BJFC 033683); Pinggu District, Jinhai Lake Park, on trunk of Cotinus, 11 August 2020, He 6766 (BJFC 033714); Yanqing District, Songshan Nature Reserve, on dead branch of Syringa, 3 September 2020, He 6943 (BJFC 033892).

Peniophora miranda (Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles) Y.L. Xu & S.H. He, comb. nov.

MycoBank: MB846860

Duportella miranda Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles, Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 107 (3): 100 (1991).

Notes—The species is characterized by the numerous brown lamprocystidia and subovoid basidiospores [3]. Boidin et al. (1998) showed that P. miranda was closely related to other Peniophora species, although the sequence is unavailable for us.

Peniophora pirispora (Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles) Y.L. Xu & S.H. He, comb. nov.

MycoBank: MB846861

Duportella pirispora Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles, Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 107 (3): 104 (1991).

Notes—The species is characterized by the brown lamprocystidia and lacrimoid to pyriform or subreniform basidiospores. Although the sequences of the species are unavailable, present molecular evidence indicated that Peniophora includes species with differently shaped basidiospores (Figure 1 and Figure 2).

Peniophora rhoica (Boidin & Lanq.) Y.L. Xu & S.H. He, comb. nov.

MycoBank: MB846862

Duportella rhoica Boidin & Lanq., Cryptogamie Mycologie 16 (2): 89 (1995).

Notes—In our phylogenetic trees (Figure 1 and Figure 2), one strain (CBS 943.96) isolated from the holotype of Duportella rhoica (LY 14759) was nested within the Peniophora clade. Thus, we propose the new combination based on molecular evidence and morphological descriptions and illustrations [40].

Peniophora tristiculoides (Sheng H. Wu & Z.C. Chen) Y.L. Xu & S.H. He, comb. nov.

MycoBank: MB846864

Duportella tristiculoides Sheng H. Wu & Z.C. Chen, Bulletin of the National Museum of Natural Science 4: 108 (1993).

Notes—Morphologically, Duportella tristiculoides is close to D. tristicula (Berk. & Broome) Reinking, which was the type species of Duportella and nested within the Peniophora clade (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Duportella tristiculoides has been only reported from the type locality in Taiwan and not been sequenced so far.

Peniophora malaiensis Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles, Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 107 (3): 137 (1991)

Peniophora taiwanensis Sheng H. Wu, Mycotaxon 85: 197 (2003)

Notes—Our phylogenetic analyses indicated that the holotype of P. malaiensis, LY 8292 from Singapore (CBS679.91), formed a strongly supported lineage with three specimens collected from Guangxi Autonomous Region and Taiwan, China, including the paratype of P. taiwanensis, Wu 9206-28 (Figure 2). The ITS sequence similarity between LY 8292 and Wu 9206-28 is 99.16% (5 base pair differences). Morphologically, the two species are very similar except that P. taiwanensis has narrower basidiospores (1.8–2.2 μm) than P. malaiensis (2–2.7 μm) [3,11]. However, our measurements of the basidiospore width of the specimen He 4870 match that of P. malaiensis (2–3 μm). Therefore, we believe that the difference in the basidiospore width is within the specific range and treat P. taiwanensis as a later synonym of P. malaiensis.

Specimen examined—CHINA, Guangxi Autonomous Region, Jinxiu County, Dayaoshan Nature Reserve, Shengtangshan, on fallen angiosperm trunk, 15 July 2015, He 4870 (BJFC 024389).

Duportella renispora Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles, Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 107 (3): 104 (1991).

Notes—The strain (CBS 733.91) isolated from the holotype of the D. renispora (LY 12699) was sequenced by Vu et al. [9]. The blast results of the ITS (MH862319) and 28S (MH873991) sequences showed that the species does not belong to Peniophora s.l. but is close to Amylostereum Boidin. Morphologically, the thinly encrusted brown cystidia and absence of subiculum of the species do match the characteristics of Amylostereum, which, however, has amyloid basidiospores. In order to confirm the identity of the species, the type specimen should be checked in the future.

A key to Peniophora species in China
1. Dendrohyphidia well-developed, brown P. versiformis
1. Dendrohyphidia absent, or colorless when present 2
2. Lamprocystidia brown over the entire length 3
2. Lamprocystidia colorless or only brown at the basal part 6
3. Skeletocystidia present 4
3. Skeletocystidia absent 5
4. Basidiospores 10–12.5 × 3.7–4.2 µm P. tristicula
4. Basidiospores 5.2–7.5 × 2–3.5 µm P. kuehneri
5. Basidiospores triangular, on palms P. trignosperma
5. Basidiospores cylindrical to narrowly ellipsoid or ovoid, on angiosperms P. lassa
6. Dendrohyphidia present, often colorless and may be difficult to see 7
6. Dendrohyphidia absent 8
7. Lamprocystidia absent; basidiospores > 7.5 µm long P. polygonia
7. Lamprocystidia present; basidiospores < 7.5 µm long P. meridionalis
8. Basidiospores ellipsoid or ovoid 9
8. Basidiospores cylindrical or allantoid 12
9. Basidiospores ovoid P. roseoalba
9. Basidiospores ellipsoid 10
10. Generative hyphae with clamps P. proxima
10. Generative hyphae without clamps 11
11. Basidiospores 9–13 × 6–7 µm P. cremicolor
11. Basidiospores 11–20 × 8–14 µm P. erikssonii
12. Basidiomes red 13
12. Basidiomes grey, cream, pale orange, pinkish, yellowish or purplish 14
13. Basidiomes pulvinate, only found on Populus P. rufa
13. Basidiomes effused, found on other hosts P. pseudoversicolor
14. Generative hyphae without clamps 15
14. Generative hyphae with clamps 19
15. Basidia with two sterigmata P. bicornis
15. Basidia with four sterigmata 16
16. Basidiospores > 10 µm long P. major
16. Basidiospores < 10 µm long 17
17. Basidiospores < 7 µm long P. malaiensis
17. Basidiospores > 7 µm long 18
18. Basidiomes up to 1.2 mm thick; basidia thick-walled P. borbonica
18. Basidiomes up to 200 µm thick; basidia thin-walled P. shenghuae
19. Gloeocystidia indistinct or absent 20
19. Gloeocystidia present 22
20. Basidiomes pinkish, effused-reflexed, usually on Quercus. P. manshurica
20. Basidiomes greyish, resupinate, on gymnosperms or angiosperms 21
21. Lamprocystidia 40–80 × 6–14 µm; on Juniperus P. junipericola
21. Lamprocystidia 15–25 × 5–10 µm; on gymnosperms or angiosperms P. cinerea
22. Gloeocystidia distinctly thick-walled, with walls up to 2–3 µm thick P. crassitunicata
22. Gloeocystidia thin- to slightly thick-walled, with walls < 1 µm thick 23
23. Lamprocystidia up to 20 µm wide; basidiospores up to 7 µm long P. pithya
23. Lamprocystidia up to 12 µm wide; basidiospores up to 10 µm long 24
24. Gloeocystidia 30–80 × 8–20 µm; basidiospores 2.5–3.5 µm wide P. nuda
24. Gloeocystidia 12.5–58 × 5.5–15.5 µm; basidiospores 3–5.5 µm wide P. yunnanensis

4. Discussion

The modern molecular phylogenetics have significantly changed the taxonomic systems of wood-inhabiting fungi in recent years. On the one hand, many new lineages and taxa were found and described, and on another hand, some morphologically dissimilar taxa were proved to be closely related in phylogeny [41,42,43,44,45]. Our results indicated that in the Peniophora s.l. group, the morphological characters, such as the color of lamprocystidia and dendrohyphidia used for generic delimitation are not reliable. As already shown in other studies [46,47,48,49,50], the identities of some genera erected based merely on morphology or together with phylogenetic analyses of not well-sampled datasets need to be confirmed.

The Peniophoraceae is a well-supported large family in Russulales, most species of which have resupinate basidiomes and non-poroid hymenophores growing on twigs, branches or trunks of woody plants or bamboos [5,51]. The species diversity, taxonomy and phylogeny of Peniophoraceae in China have been investigated and studied [16,37,52,53,54,55], and this study is a part of this consecutive research. However, the two large genera in Peniophoraceae, Scytinostroma Donk and Vararia P. Karst., that are closely related and were shown to be polyphyletic [6,7,28], have not been sufficiently studied worldwide. We are going to carry out a complete morphological and phylogenetic analyses of the Peniophoraceae by adding a lot of Scytinostroma-Vararia samples from Asia accumulated by the authors in recent years.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-H.H.; methodology, Y.-L.X. and Y.T.; performing the experiment, Y.-L.X. and Y.T.; formal analysis, Y.-L.X. and Y.T.; validation, Y.-L.X., Y.T. and S.-H.H.; resources, S.-H.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-L.X.; writing—review and editing, S.-H.H.; visualization, Y.-L.X. and Y.T.; supervision, S.-H.H.; project administration, S.-H.H.; funding acquisition, S.-H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

The research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 31750001; 31670013).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Eriksson J. A taxonomical study with special reference to the Swedish species. Symb. Bot. Ups. 1950;10:1–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Boidin J., Lanquetin P. Peniophora (sect. Duportella) kuehneri et halimi novae sp.; réflexions sur les genres Peniophora et Duportella. Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon. 1974;43:47–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Boidin J., Lanquetin P., Gilles G. Les Peniophoraceae de la zone intertropicale (Basidiomycètes, Aphyllophorales). A. Espèces paléotropicales. Bull. Trimest. Société Mycol. Fr. 1991;107:91–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boidin J., Mugnier J., Canales R. Taxonomie molecularies des Aphyllophorales. Mycotaxon. 1998;66:445–491. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Andreasen M., Hallenberg N. A taxonomic survey of the Peniophoraceae. Synop. Fungorum. 2009;26:56–119. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Larsson E., Larsson K.H. Phylogenetic relationships of russuloid basidiomycetes with emphasis on aphyllophoralean taxa. Mycologia. 2003;95:1037–1065. doi: 10.1080/15572536.2004.11833020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Larsson K.H. Re-thinking the classification of corticioid fungi. Mycol. Res. 2007;111:1040–1063. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Miller S.L., Larsson E., Larsson K.H., Verbeken A., Nuytinck J. Perspectives in the new Russulales. Mycologia. 2006;98:960–970. doi: 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vu D., Groenewald M., De Vries M., Gehrmann T., Stielow B., Eberhardt U., Al-Hatmi A., Groenewald J.Z., Cardinali G., Houbraken J., et al. Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation. Stud. Mycol. 2019;91:23–36. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2018.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wu S.H. New records of the Corticiaceae from mainland China. Mycotaxon. 2002;82:289–294. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wu S.H. A study of Peniophora species with simple-septate hyphae occurring in Taiwan. Mycotaxon. 2003;85:187–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wu S.H. Twenty species of corticioid fungi newly recorded from China. Mycotaxon. 2008;104:79–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wu S.H. Survey of corticioid fungi in Taiwan, to 2010. Fungal Sci. 2010;25:49–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Maekawa N. Japanece Corticaceaea II. Rep. Tottori Mycol. Inst. 1994;32:1–123. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Maekawa N., Yang Z.L., Zang M. Corticioid Fungi (Basidiomycetes) collected in Sichuan Province, China. Mycotaxon. 2002;83:81–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zou L., Zhang X., Deng Y., Zhao C. Four New Wood-Inhabiting Fungal Species of Peniophoraceae (Russulales, Basidiomycota) from the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, China. J. Fungi. 2022;8:1227. doi: 10.3390/jof8111227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kornerup A., Wanscher J.H. Methuen Handbook of Colour. 3rd ed. Methuen; London, UK: 1978. p. 493. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.White T.J., Bruns T., Lee S., Taylor J. PCR Protocols: A guide to methods and applications. In: Innis M.A., Gelfand D.H., Sninsky J.J., White T.J., editors. Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. Academic Press; San Diego, CA, USA: 1990. pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vilgalys R., Hester M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990;172:4238–4246. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hall T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999;41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Katoh K., Rozewicki J., Yamada K.D. MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform. 2019;20:1160–1166. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Maddison W.P., Maddison D.R. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 3.5.1. 2018. [(accessed on 20 October 2022)]. Available online: http://www.mesquiteproject.org.
  • 23.Swofford D.L. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods) Sinauer Associates; Sunderland, UK: 2002. [(accessed on 25 October 2022)]. Version 4.0b10. Available online: http://paup.csit.fsu.edu/ [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Stamatakis A. RAxML Version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ronquist F., Teslenko M., Van Der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012;61:539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Darriba D., Taboada G.L., Doallo R., Posada D. ModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Binder M., Hibbett D.S., Larsson K.H., Larsson E., Langer E., Langer G. The phylogenetic distribution of resupinate forms across the major clades of mushroom-forming fungi (Homobasidiomycetes) Syst. Biodivers. 2005;3:113–157. doi: 10.1017/S1477200005001623. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Leal-Dutra C.A., Neves M.A., Griffith G.W., Reck M.A., Clasen L.A., Dentinger B.T. Reclassification of Parapterulicium Corner (Pterulaceae, Agaricales), contributions to Lachnocladiaceae and Peniophoraceae (Russulales) and introduction of Baltazaria gen. nov. MycoKeys. 2018;37:39–56. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.37.26303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hsiau P.T., Harrington T.C. Phylogenetics and adaptations of basidiomycetous fungi fed upon by bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Symbiosis. 2003;34:111–131. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hallenberg N., Yurchenko E.O., Ghobad-Nejhad M. Peniophora pseudonuda is a synonym of P. laeta. Mycotaxon. 2010;112:153–162. doi: 10.5248/112.153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Spirin V., Kout J. Duportella lassa sp. nov. from Northeast Asia. Mycotaxon. 2015;130:483–488. doi: 10.5248/130.483. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Robles C.A., Carmarán C.C., Lopez S.E. Screening of xylophagous fungi associated with Platanus acerifolia in urban landscapes: Biodiversity and potential biodeterioration. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011;100:129–135. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hokama Y., Savi D.C., Assad B., Aluizio R., Gomes-Figueiredo J., Adamoski D., Glienke C. Endophytic fungi isolated from Vochysia divergens in the Pantanal, Mato Grosso do Sul: Diversity, phylogeny and biocontrol of Phyllosticta citricarpa. In: Hughes E., editor. Endophytic Fungi: Divers. Charact. Biocontrol. Nova Publishers; New York, NY, USA: 2016. pp. 93–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lygis V., Vasiliauskas R., Larsson K.H., Stenlid J. Wood-inhabiting fungi in stems of Fraxinus excelsior in declining ash stands of northern Lithuania, with particular reference to Armillaria cepistipes. Scand. J. For. Res. 2005;20:337–346. doi: 10.1080/02827580510036238. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vasiliauskas R., Larsson E., Larsson K.H., Stenlid J. Persistence and long-term impact of Rotstop biological control agent on mycodiversity in Picea abies stumps. Biol. Control. 2005;32:295–304. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2004.10.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Grum-Grzhimaylo O.A., Debets A.J., Bilanenko E.N. The diversity of microfungi in peatlands originated from the White Sea. Mycologia. 2016;108:233–254. doi: 10.3852/14-346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu S.L., He S.H. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Dichostereum (Russulales), with descriptions of three new species from southern China. MycoKeys. 2018;40:111–126. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.40.28700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Boidin J. Les Peniophoraceae des parties tempérées et froides de l’hémisphère nord (Basidiomycotina) Publ. Société Linnéenne Lyon. 1994;63:317–334. doi: 10.3406/linly.1994.11047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hjortstam K., Ryvarden L. Some new tropical genera and species of corticioid fungi (Basidiomycotina, Aphyllophorales) Synop. Fungorum. 2004;18:20–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Boidin J., Lanquetin P. Sur quelques corticiés (Basidiomycotina) de l’Ethiopie. Cryptogamie Mycologie. 1995;16:85–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhao C.L., Cui B.K., Song J., Dai Y.C. Fragiliporiaceae, a new family of Polyporales (Basidiomycota) Fungal Divers. 2015;70:115–126. doi: 10.1007/s13225-014-0299-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chen J.J., Cui B.K., Dai Y.C. Global diversity and molecular systematics of Wrightoporia s.l. (Russulales, Basidiomycota) Persoonia. 2016;37:21–36. doi: 10.3767/003158516X689666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Han M.L., Chen Y.Y., Shen L.L., Song J., Vlasák J., Dai Y.C., Cui B.K. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the brown-rot fungi: Fomitopsis and its related genera. Fungal Divers. 2016;80:343–373. doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0364-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cui B.K., Li H.J., Ji X., Zhou J.L., Song J., Si J., Dai Y.C. Species diversity, taxonomy and phylogeny of Polyporaceae (Basidiomycota) in China. Fungal Divers. 2019;97:137–302. doi: 10.1007/s13225-019-00427-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wu F., Zhou L.W., Vlasák J., Dai Y.C. Global diversity and systematics of Hymenochaetaceae with poroid hymenophore. Fungal Divers. 2022;113:1–192. doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00496-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chen C.C., Chen C.Y., Wu S.H. Species diversity, taxonomy and multi-gene phylogeny of phlebioid clade (Phanerochaetaceae, Irpicaceae, Meruliaceae) of Polyporales. Fungal Divers. 2021;111:337–442. doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00490-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.He S.H., Dai Y.C. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Hymenochaete and allied genera of Hymenochaetaceae (Basidiomycota) in China. Fungal Divers. 2012;56:77–93. doi: 10.1007/s13225-012-0174-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Li Y., Nakasone K.K., Chen C.C., Zhao C.L., Cao T., Yuan H.S., He S.H. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Cystostereaceae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota): A new genus, five new species, and three new combinations. J. Fungi. 2022;8:1229. doi: 10.3390/jof8111229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Liu S.L., Nakasone K.K., Wu S.H., He S.H., Dai Y.C. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Lopharia s.s., Dendrodontia, Dentocorticium and Fuscocerrena (Basidiomycota, Polyporales) MycoKeys. 2018;32:25–48. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.32.23641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Riebeseh J., Yurchenko E., Nakasone K.K., Langer E. Phylogenetic and morphological studies in Xylodon (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) with the addition of four new species. MycoKeys. 2019;47:97–137. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.47.31130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yurchenko E. The Genus Peniophora (Basidiomycota) of Eastern Europe: Morphology, Taxonomy, Ecology, Distribution. National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, VF Kuprevich Insitute of Experimental Botany; Minsk, Belarus: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dai Y.C. A revised checklist of corticioid and hydnoid fungi in China for 2010. Mycoscience. 2011;52:69–79. doi: 10.1007/S10267-010-0068-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wang H., He X., Zhao C.L. Scytinostroma yunnanense sp. nov. (Russulales, Basidiomycota) evidenced by morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses in China. Phytotaxa. 2020;451:145–153. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.451.2.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Liu S.L., He S.H. The genus Vararia (Russulales, Basidiomycota) in China. Two new species and two new Chinese records. Nord. J. Bot. 2016;34:553–558. doi: 10.1111/njb.01170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Liu S.L., Tian Y., Nie T., Thawthong A., Hyde K.D., Xu L.L., He S.H. Updates on East Asian Asterostroma (Russulales, Basidiomycota): New species and new records from Thailand and China. Mycol. Prog. 2017;16:667–676. doi: 10.1007/s11557-017-1301-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Journal of Fungi are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES