Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) emerges as a complex, multifactorial disease. While there is increasing evidence that dysregulated T cells play a central role in PD pathogenesis, elucidation of the pathomechanical changes in related signaling is still in its beginnings. We employed time-resolved RNA expression upon the activation of peripheral CD4+ T cells to track and functionally relate changes on cellular signaling in representative cases of patients at different stages of PD. While only few miRNAs showed time-course related expression changes in PD, we identified groups of genes with significantly altered expression for each different time window. Towards a further understanding of the functional consequences, we highlighted pathways with decreased or increased activity in PD, including the most prominent altered IL-17 pathway. Flow cytometric analyses showed not only an increased prevalence of Th17 cells but also a specific subtype of IL-17 producing γδ-T cells, indicating a previously unknown role in PD pathogenesis.
Subject terms: Immunology, Mechanisms of disease, Parkinson's disease
Introduction
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative disorders with a still increasing worldwide incidence [1–3]. Cardinal PD motor symptoms include tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity and postural instability, which are connected to the loss of dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta [4]. The pathological formation of α-synuclein aggregates and Lewy bodies has been associated with neuronal degeneration [4–6].
However, it is becoming increasingly evident that factors outside the brain are also significant contributors to PD pathogenesis. Deregulated immune cells could play a central role in the according scenarios [7–9]. Especially CD4+ T cells are of major importance for a coordinated immune function and appear to be deregulated in context of PD as they invade the brain and likely induce an autoimmune reaction [10–12]. Since functional T cell deregulation seems to emerge long time before the manifestation of PD cardinal motor symptoms, T cell changes also bear a great potential of being utilized as biomarkers for early diagnostics [12, 13]. Additionally, T cell changes offer themselves as a starting point for the development of novel (immune) therapeutic strategies [8, 14]. However, the pathomechanistic deregulation of T cell pathways awaits further clarification [8, 15, 16].
Time-course RNA expression data are particularly suitable to track and functionally relate changes on cellular signaling pathways [17, 18]. Thus, to decipher deregulated T cell signaling in context with PD, we analyzed time-resolved RNA expression dynamics upon the activation of peripheral CD4+ T cells.
Based on the examination of five representative PD cases at different stages of disease, our study highlights comprehensive RNA expressional deregulations and identifies pathways related to changes on T cell functionalities in PD. Our data point to a mitochondrial dysfunction and a deregulation of DNA repair and are indicative for an increase of various autoimmune features and also provide first evidence for a yet unknown role of IL-17 producing gamma delta T cells in PD pathogenesis.
Results
Experimental setup and quality control
To uncover deregulated T cell signaling in Parkinson’s disease (PD), we analyzed peripheral CD4+ T cells from five PD patients in an age range between 53–86 and at different stages of disease i.e., stage 4, 4, 2.5, 1, and 1 according to the Hoehn & Yahr scale. Patient 5 was analyzed immediately upon diagnosis. As control we used five blood controls (healthy controls (HCs)) from healthy donors, aged 53–69.
Since the initial 24 h time frame of the activation is decisive for a proper T cell immune function, including shifts of central signaling pathways and the transition from a resting to a proliferative cell stage [17, 19, 20], we induced the activation of the isolated CD4+ T cells by in vitro stimulation. Time-course sampling was done at different time-points (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h), resulting in a total of 60 RNA samples (PD (n = 30); HC (n = 30)). These RNA samples were used for high-throughput analysis of time-resolved RNA expression profiles. An overview of the experimental setup is given in Fig. 1A. RNA integrity number (RIN) values of the extracted total RNA ranged from 7.1 to 9.1 indicating a high RNA quality for all time-course samples. Since CD69, IFIT3, and NME1 are reliable markers for the early 24 h T cell activation phase [21], we used them to verify the effective induction of the T cell activation process. Comparability between the two groups (PD patients and HCs) was confirmed by overlapping CD69, IFIT3, and NME1 mRNA expression patterns (Fig. 1B–D).
Detection of differential transcriptomics during the time-course of T cell activation
Analyses on the time-course transcriptional data by data clustering and multidimensional scaling identified distinct expressional changes between the PD and HC group. In detail, we calculated the pairwise Euclidean distance between the samples, across all genes and across all the time-points. We then applied the cmdscale function of the R base library to perform a classical multidimensional scaling with two dimensions (Parameters: eig = TRUE, k = 2). The combined time-course data allowed a clear separation between PD patients and HCs (Supplementary Fig. 1A, horizontal axis). While patients at an early stage of PD (P4 and P5) mapped closer to HCs, patients with a progressive stage mapped at a greater distance to HCs, indicating of a possible link between clustering and severity or duration of PD. However, due to the small number of patients and controls, our study focuses on the separation between controls and PD patients considering both, early and late stages of the Parkinson´s disease.
A total of n = 30 158 genes were analyzed by our time-resolved RNA expression analyses. We found 535 genes with a median log2 fold change of ≥0.5 or ≤−0.5 during the time-course. Out of the resulting 535 genes, 454 genes additionally showed a median log2 fold change of ≥0.5 or ≤−0.5 for the comparison between PD patients and HCs. For the same comparison we found 175 deregulated genes with significantly different expression (p-values adjusted by Benjamini & Hochberg (adj. p-value ≤ 0.05) (Fig. 2A).
We next addressed the question how many genes were differentially expressed in different time windows between PD patients and HCs. While expression changes were found throughout the entire time course, the significant changes were mainly attributed to the early and intermediary phases as detailed in the following. Likewise, multidimensional scaling under itemization of the different time-points, specified a clear distinction between PD patients and HCs, particularly for the early hours (0–4 h) of the T cell activation time-course (Supplementary Fig. 1B).
Out of the 454 genes differentially expressed between PD and HCs with a median log2 fold change of ≥0.5 or ≤ −0.5, there were 41 genes exclusively within the early time window between 0–2 h, 43 genes exclusively within the intermediary phase between 4–8 h, and 42 genes exclusively in the late phase between 12–24 h. There was an overlap of 102 genes that were shared between the early and intermediary phases, 38 genes shared between the intermediary and late phases and 167 genes that were found throughout all phases of the T cell activation course (Fig. 2B).
Out of the 175 genes with a significantly altered expression, there were 72 genes specifically for the early time window and 32 genes specifically for the intermediary time window. There were no genes shared between the intermediary and late phases. Likewise, no genes were shared between the early and late phases. A single gene (HCAR3) was found in all phases of the T cell activation course (Fig. 2C). As exemplified for VCAN1 in the sections below, not all of the genes showed uniform directions of deregulations throughout the entire time-course.
Overall, we identified 172 core deregulated genes with both, a significantly altered expression (adj. p-value ≤ 0.05) and a median log2 fold change of ≥0.5 or ≤ −0.5 for the comparison between PD samples and HCs (Fig. 2A). In the following we address the different time points and provide examples of top deregulated genes (Fig. 3). Out of the core deregulated genes there were 117 genes with an increased RNA expression in PD at the 0 h time-point. Some of the most extensively increased genes at this time-point were IL12B, IL12A and TNFRSF8. TGFBI, ADAMTS10 and PACSIN1 were amongst the top genes with a decreased RNA expression in PD. At time points 2 h and 4 h, there were 53 and 117 of the core deregulated genes, respectively. Among the most extensively increased genes were IL12B, IL12A and CCL18 at the 2 h time-point and IL12A, CXCL9 and IL2RA at the 4 h time-point. Examples for the top genes with a decreased RNA expression were PACSIN1, PKMYT1 and RAD51 at the 2 h and PACSIN1, LOC100505585 and BRCA1 at the 4 h time-point, respectively. As for the later time points there were no deregulated genes with a significantly altered expression and a median log2 fold change of ≥0.5 or ≤−0.5 at the 8 h and 12 h. However, at the 24 h time-point HCAR3 showed an increased expression meeting these criteria.
Specification of deregulated T cell gene expression signatures in context with PD
In the following, we focus on those core deregulated genes (i.e., genes with an adj. p-value ≤0.05 and median log2 fold change of ≥0.5 or ≤−0.5 between PD and HC) that also show a significant deregulation at more than one time-point.
In total we identified 29 core deregulated genes with significantly increased RNA expression at least at two time-points during the overall T cell activation time-course (Fig. 4A). Corresponding genes encode among others the chemokine ligand CCL18, the growth factor and type 2 cytokine AREG, the mitochondrial monoamine oxidase MAOA, the hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor HCAR3 and the TNF receptor TNFRSF8 (Fig. 4B–E). CCL18 mRNA showed significant expressional deregulation between PD and HC samples during 0–4 h. Median log2 fold changes for the comparison between PD and HC samples within this timeframe were in the range 1.90 to 2.61. Corresponding FDR adjusted p-values were in the range of 4.79 × 10−2–1.57 × 10−2. Likewise, AREG and MAOA mRNAs showed significant expressional deregulation between PD and HC samples during 0–4 h. Median log2 fold changes were in the range of 1.82 to 2.68 for AREG and of 1.09 to 1.57 for MAOA. Corresponding FDR adjusted p-values ranged from 2.29 × 10−2–4.79 × 10−2 and 2.70 × 10−2–4.79 × 10−2, respectively. The HCAR3 mRNA showed significant deregulation during 2–4 h and at the 24 h time-point. Corresponding median log2 fold changes ranged from 0.97 to 3.08 and FDR adjusted p-values ranged from 3.17 × 10−2–4.91 × 10−2. The TNFRSF8 mRNA showed significant deregulation during 0–2 h. Corresponding median log2 fold changes ranged from 1.16 to 2.18 and FDR adjusted p-values ranged from 8.97 × 10−3–4.95 × 10−2.
There were 46 of the core deregulated genes with a decreased RNA expression at least at two time-points in PD samples during the T cell activation time-course (Fig. 5A). These encode among others the extracellular protease ADAMTS10, the nuclear phosphoprotein BRCA1, the uncharacterized gene LOC100505585 and the replication initiation factor MCM10 (Fig. 5B–E). All corresponding RNAs showed significant expressional deregulation during 0–4 h of T cell activation. Median log2 fold changes of the comparison between PD and HC samples within this timeframe were in the range of −1.23 to −1.39 for ADAMTS10 and of −0.73 to −1.06 for BRCA1. Corresponding FDR adjusted p-values were in the range of 2.29 × 10−2–3.40 × 10−2 for both genes. Log2 fold changes of LOC100505585 and MCM10 were in the range −1.05 to −1.62 and −0.61 to −0.76, respectively. FDR adjusted p-values were in the range of 2.29 × 10−2–3.40 × 10−2 and of 3.13 × 10−2–4.83 × 10−2, respectively.
A single mRNA (extracellular matrix regulator VCAN1) revealed an alternation of increased RNA expression at 0 h (with a log2 fold change of 1.20 and an adj. p-value of 3.13 × 10−2) and a decreased RNA expression at 4 h (with a log2 fold change of −0.66 and an adj. p-value of 4.86 × 10−2) in PD samples (Fig. 5F, G).
Notably and as summarized in Supplementary table 2, the above-mentioned deregulated genes can be related to PD, neurodegeneration, and autoimmune diseases and are currently being under investigation for therapeutic use.
Specification of deregulated miRNA expression in context with PD
We next performed time-resolved expression analyses of the miRNome. In contrast to the transcriptome analyses we identified only very few miRNAs, according to the above applied criteria (i.e., time-course expression changes and deregulation in PD patients with significant differences at more than one time-point) (Fig. 6).
Hsa-miR-132-3p showed significantly increased expression at 8 h and at 24 h in PD samples. The according median log2 fold changes between PD and HC samples were 0.59 and 0.58, corresponding FDR adjusted p-values were 1.66 × 10−2 and 3.26 × 10−2, respectively. Hsa-miR-223-3p showed significantly increased expression at 0 h and between 8 h–24 h in PD samples. Log2 fold changes were in a range between 0.94 and 1.38. Corresponding FDR adjusted p-values were in the range between 1.66 × 10−2–4.63 × 10−2.
Hsa-miR-4730 showed significantly decreased expression in PD samples at 0 h, 8 h and 24 h, hsa-miR-762 at 8 h and 24 h, and hsa-miR-155–5p at 0 h, 12 h and 24 h. The according log2 fold changes of the comparison between PD and HC samples were in the overall range of −0.46 to −0.83 (hsa-miR-4730), −0.26 to −0.84 (hsa-miR-762) and −0.30 to −0.80 (hsa-miR-155-5p). Corresponding FDR adjusted p-values ranged from 1.66 × 10−2–4.63 × 10−2, 1.66 × 10−2–3.26 × 10−2 and 1.71 × 10−2–4.63 × 10−2, respectively.
MiRNAs usually exert rather moderate effects as frequently shown by decreased mRNA levels of their respective target genes [22, 23]. Putative targets of the above-described miRNAs were identified by inverse correlations of the according miRNA and mRNA time-course changes. For each time-point, median log2 FCs were determined for the comparison between PD and HC groups. An inverse Pearson´s correlation coefficient (PCC) ≤−0.5 was chosen for the matching of resulting miRNA and mRNA time-course changes. As an additional criterion, a median log2 FC decrease level of at least −0.3 was chosen for putative targets of the miRNAs that showed an increased expression in context with PD. A median log2 FC of ≥0.3 was chosen for putative targets of miRNAs with a decreased expression in PD. Corresponding analyses for hsa-miR-132-3p and hsa-miR-223-3p identified 1,525 and 862 target genes, respectively. Analyses for hsa-miR-4730, hsa-miR-155-5p and hsa-miR-762 identified 1,293, 1,747 and 1,101 genes, respectively, which are subject to direct or secondary miRNA regulatory effects. To identify direct miRNA targets we included information on strong experimental target validation as determined by miRTargetLink 2.0 [24] (Supplementary table 3). Amongst others, we identified CRK as target of miR-132-3p [25] with a link to T cell migration [26], and TP53INP1 as target of miR-155-5p [27–33] with a link to cellular stress response [34].
Determination of deregulated signaling pathways in CD4+ T cells of PD patients
To identify functional consequences of the T cell expressional deregulation, we performed pathway analyses for the 172 core deregulated genes. We separately analyzed the 67 genes with increased RNA expression for pathways with increased activity in PD and the 89 genes with decreased RNA expression for pathways with decreased activity in PD. We excluded 16 genes that did not show a clear direction of the RNA deregulation from the further analysis. Gene set enrichment analyses i.e., over-representation analyses (ORAs) were conducted by the in silico tool “Genetrail 3.2” [35]. Using “KEGG” (“Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes” [36]) and “Reactome” [37] databases, ORA analyses uncovered a total of n = 38 significantly enriched categories for the genes with increased RNA expression in PD samples. These categories included “IL-17 signaling pathway” (adj. p-value 6.13 × 10−7), “Jak-STAT signaling pathway” (adj. p-value 1.33 × 10−6), “TNF signaling pathway” (adj. p-value 1.84 × 10−4), “Interleukin-10 signaling” (adj. p-value 5.58 × 10−11), “G alpha (i) signaling events” (adj. p-value 8.10 × 10−3), and categories of autoimmune related diseases like “Rheumatoid arthritis” (adj. p-value 8.49 × 10−3) and “Type I diabetes mellitus” (adj. p-value 1.07 × 10−2). As for the genes with decreased RNA expression in PD samples, ORA analyses identifed 39 significantly enriched categories including “Cell cycle” (adj. p-value 1.11 × 10−4), “G1/S-Specific Transcription” (adj. p-value 5.50 × 10−5), “Resolution of Sister Chromatid Cohesion” (adj. p-value 6.15 × 10−3), and “Resolution of D-loop Structures through Synthesis-Dependent Strand Annealing (SDSA)” (adj. p-value 6.15 × 10−3). Corresponding results are summarized in Fig. 7A, B.
Multiple interactions of the corresponding protein products were determined by a respective protein-interaction network of increased and decreased transcripts using the STRING database (v 11.5) [38] (Fig. 7B and D).
Increase of IL-17 signaling, Th17 and IL-17 producing gamma delta T cells in PD
Numerous of the genes that we found with an increased RNA expression pattern in connection with PD, could be assigned to the KEGG category “IL-17 signaling pathway” (as already mentioned above). Representative genes such as CCL20, IL12A, IL12B, IL17D, IL17F, IL21, IL22, IL6, PTGS2 and TNFRSR8 showed distinct mRNA deregulation during the time-course (Fig. 8A). RORC and BATF are considered as crucial transcription factors for the induction of IL-17 signaling and Th17 development [39, 40]. Examination of the corresponding time-course expression data indicated increased mRNA levels of these key transcription factors as part of the T cell activation process (Fig. 8B, C).
These findings prompted us to perform a more detailed analysis of the cell composition for the PD samples in comparison to HCs. Flow cytometric analyses were conducted based on cryo-conserved aliquots of the CD4+ T cells that were isolated for the time-course RNA expression analyses. The median purity of the isolated CD4+ T cells was at 99.5% (range: 94.5–99.6%) and 99.3% (range: 93.8–99.7%) in HC and PD samples, respectively. T cell activation was induced for 6 h prior to specific antibody staining and FACS detection.
In line with the results from our time-course RNA expression data, the determination of peripheral CD4+ T cell subtype composition verified an increased prevalence of Th17 cells (IL-17+) within PD samples (HC: Median 3.4%, range: 2.5–3.9%; PD: Median 6.5%, range: 4.8–9.8%; p = 0.0168) (Fig. 8E). Additionally, we found a significant increase of gamma delta T cells (γδTCR+ ; HC: Median 4.2%, range: 1.3–6.5%; PD: Median 7.6%, range: 6.6–9.3%; p = 0.0188) in PD samples. Among the γδ T cells, we found a significant increase of a specific subtype i.e., IL-17 producing gamma delta T cells (γδTCR + IL-17+; HC: Median 3.4%, range: 2.6–5.8%; PD: Median 7.3%, range: 6.5–13.1%; p = 0.0163; Fig. 8F, G). No significant differences were detected for Th1 cells (IFNγ+; HC: Median 38.7%; PD: Median 33.4%; p = 0.8446), Th2 cells (IL-4+; HC: Median 6.4%; PD: Median 7.5%; p = 0.2012) or Treg cells (CD127lowCD25high; HC: Median 0.2%; PD: Median 0.2%; p = 0.7606) (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Discussion
Despite first evidence for an involvement of peripheral T lymphocytes in PD pathogenesis and their potential utility for novel therapeutic strategies, there is still a lack of studies that specify relevant deregulation of T cell pathways in context with PD [8, 15]. To decipher deregulated T cell signaling in PD, we analyzed time-resolved RNA expression patterns (0–24 h) following the in vitro activation of peripheral CD4+ T cells.
When comparing the T cell activation time-course data of our PD patients to HCs, we identified an up-regulation for miR-223-3p. An increased prevalence of this miRNA has also been detected within the blood sera of PD patients [41] and a connection to brain autoimmune diseases has several times been reported [42, 43].
Additionally, we found miR-155-5p with a significant down-regulation in the CD4+ T cell time-course data of PD patients. This miRNA has, however, formerly been reported to have an increased prevalence in the blood cells of PD mouse models [44]. Our findings of a significantly reduced miR-155-5p expression were mainly attributable to the PD patients 1–3. It is legitimate to speculate that the detected effect may be related to treatment with levodopa [45], which was given to the patients 1–3. Admittingly, it is highly challenging to pinpoint drug related effects in studies with a small number of patients that received different medical treatments. We do, however, feel that the overall RNA data in our study does not reflect the treatment schemas: While we found RNA deregulations common to all patients, each patient was treated by different drugs and drug combinations.
We also identified significant deregulation of miR-762. This miRNA has been described as a regulator of energy metabolic functions and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in mitochondria [46]. Elevated production of ROS is a well-known reason for the emergence of DNA damages and is commonly associated with pathological changes in cell physiology [47]. Our finding of a miR-762 deregulation may be indicative for the according scenarios in CD4+ T cells of PD patients. We also observed deregulations of specific mRNAs, including BRCA1, MAOA, MCM10, or RAD51, which encode mitochondrial proteins and enzymes involved in maintaining the genomic integrity [48–50]. Additionally, our enrichment analysis of the transcripts that were decreased in PD identified functional links to synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) that is part of the DNA double-strand break repair pathway [51]. Our findings indicate that mitochondrial dysfunctions and a malfunction in DNA repair mechanisms likely contribute to T cell related PD pathogenesis. This assumption was further supported by analyses of a specific sub-group of alpha-synuclein specific memory T cells in PD [52]. Common genomic mutations, contributing to the development of PD, also relate to changes of mitochondrial functions and DNA repair mechanisms [53–55]. Deregulations of these processes are considered as central hallmarks of PD in neuronal cells [56]. However, the functional effects of genomic mutations may possibly not be restricted to neurons but may also have a bearing for pathological changes in other cell types, including the CD4+ T cells.
Further RNA expressional deregulation can be assigned to central immune and cytokine pathways including the IL-10, Jak-STAT and G alpha (i) signaling pathways. Shifts on corresponding pathways are commonly associated with pathological T cell functions and immune disorders [57–59]. As already mentioned in the results section, the deregulation of representative transcripts such as AREG, CCL18, HCAR3, and TNFRSF8, further supports the contribution of T cell autoimmune features to PD pathogenesis. The IL-17 signaling pathway in particular appears to play a prominent role for the development of brain related autoimmune diseases [60]. Notably, animal models also provided evidence for a link between circulating IL-17 and cognitive impairments [61]. In our analyses we found strong evidence for the deregulation of IL-17 signaling. In detail, the subtype composition of corresponding peripheral CD4+ T cell samples revealed a higher incidence of cells that were assigned to the Th17 subtype. In line with our results, Sommer et al. showed an increased prevalence of IL-17-producing T cells in patients at early stages of PD [62]. Interleukin-1 (IL1) that is secreted by activated microglia in context with PD pathogenesis [63] is a critical cytokine for Th17 cell differentiation [64, 65]. As shown for other neurodegenerative diseases [66] a crosstalk between the brain and periphery may provide a potential explanation for our findings of increased TH17 counts in PD peripheral blood samples. In addition, we found an increased prevalence of a specific subtype of IL-17 producing gamma delta T cells in PD patients. To our knowledge, the involvement of this cell type in PD pathogenesis has not been reported yet. IL-17 producing gamma delta T cells can be activated, independently of any T cell receptor stimulation, through cytokines such as IL1 [67] and are considered to play an important role for autoimmune diseases by amplifying Th17 responses [68–70]. It is conceivable that this cell type contributes to the development of an autoimmune reaction as part of the PD pathogenesis.
In summary, our time-resolved RNA expression analyses of in vitro activated CD4+ T cells uncovered comprehensive RNA expressional deregulation in PD. Associated cellular processes point to a mitochondrial dysfunction and a disruption of DNA repair in CD4+ T cells of PD patients. Various connections to autoimmunity and to central PD features are highlighted. We found strong indications for the pathomechanistic relevance of IL-17 signaling and provide first evidence for the involvement of IL-17 producing γδ-T cells in PD. Our analyses refer to a relatively small number of exemplary cases. Extended analyses with larger patient groups will help to assess their potential for future clinical implications.
Materials and Methods
PD patients and healthy controls
Epidemiological studies show an increased prevalence of PD in connection with progressing age and with the male sex [1, 71, 72]. Based on this, the PD patients (n = 5) of this pilot study constitute a cohort of elderly male (age 53–85 yrs.; non-smokers), representative for different stages of disease development by the Hoehn and Yahr Scale [73, 74]. Corresponding HCs (n = 4) were matched for age (age 53–63 yrs.; non-smokers) and gender. One HC was carried out twice (C1 and C1_2), representing independent replicates from the same healthy donor but from two different days of blood collection (at a time distance of seven months). Basic subject data, including age, stage of disease, reported PD onset, clinical features, comorbidities and medications, are summarized in Supplementary table 1. Peripheral blood samples for subsequent T cell isolation (27 ml per donor) were drawn to lithium heparin containing collection tubes (S-Monovette, Sarstedt AG & Co. KG, Numbrecht, Germany). Written informed consents were obtained from all subjects (ethics approval ID: Ethical vote No. 213/08) and a previous immune reaction was excluded to the time-point of blood collection by the analysis of total blood counts from an additional aliquot (2 ml).
CD4+ T cell isolation and collection of activated time-course samples
CD4+ T cells were isolated from peripheral blood samples by density gradient centrifugation, followed by negative selection with the Human CD4+ T cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). The isolated cells were suspended with RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany; with 10% v/v heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (Biochrom GmbH, Berlin, Germany) and 1% v/v penicillin-streptomycin (100 U/ml)) and incubated in 25 mm flasks overnight. At the following day, the cells were seeded in a 96 well format (350,000 cells/well) and were in vitro activated by the human T cell activation/expansion kit (αCD2/αCD3/αCD28 MACSiBead particles, Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Cellular samples were collected from different wells at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after activation for subsequent RNA extraction as formerly described [17]. Time-course collection resulted in a total of n = 30 samples from PD patients (n = 5) and controls (n = 4 + n = 1 (C1 replicate)), respectively.
Flow cytometry and analysis of CD4+ T cell subtype composition
Isolated CD4+ T cells from PD patients and healthy controls were stimulated with phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA; 5 ng/ml)/ionomycin (500 ng/ml) (both from Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) for 6 h. After 2 h, brefeldin A (10 mg/ml; Sigma) was added. Cells were fixed using BD Bioscience Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit and stained using anti-CD4 (clone RPA-T4, AB_395752), anti-IFNγ (clone 4 S.B3, AB_2738952), anti-IL-4 (clone REA895, AB_2726799), anti-IL-17 (clone CZ8-23G1, AB_2752081), anti-CD127 (clone HIL-7R-M21, AB_2744279), anti-CD25 (clone M-A251, AB_2744336) and anti-γδTCR (clone 11F2, AB_2733698) and analyzed by flow cytometry (FACS CantoII, BD Biosciences). For statistical comparisons, of the FACS results and for the analysis of CD4+ T cell subtype specific transcription factor (RORC and BATF) mRNA expression data, unpaired t tests were performed assuming a normal distribution of the data.
RNA extraction and determination of time-resolved expression profiles
Cellular RNA was extracted, quality controlled, quantified and analyzed by microarray systems from Agilent Technologies (One-Color, Human SurePrint G3) as detailed in a previous publication [17]. For the time-resolved transcriptome analysis one sample (patient P5) yielded no data at the 4 h time-point.
Data processing
For both miRNA and transcriptome microarrays, raw expression values were processed using the limma R-package [75]. A background correction (method = normexp, offset = 16), quantile normalization, and log2 transformation were conducted. For the transcriptome data, a batch correction (‘removeBatchEffect’ method of the limma R-package) was applied to account for potential variations, due to different microarray batches.
Statistical analysis
For the statistical analysis of the expression values, we used a two-step approach. In the first step, we identified genes or miRNAs that showed a change in expression during the analyzed 24 h period after T cell activation. For these genes, we then compared expression differences between PD patents and HCs in the second step.
To determine the expression change of a given miRNA or gene in the analyzed time frame, we calculated their maximum deviation from the initial time point using the log2 fold-change for each sample individually. We then aggregated the scores for the PD and the HC groups, respectively, using the median. Finally, we select all genes or miRNAs that appeared with an absolute fold-change of at least 1.5 in one on the two analyzed groups.
To compare gene expression differences between PD patients and HCs, we calculated log2 fold-changes between the median values in both groups and conducted a shrinkage t-test [76]. For all analyses, the p-values were FDR adjusted [77].
Enrichment analysis
All enrichment analyses in this study were performed using version 3.2 of the GeneTrail web service [35]. For the analysis of deregulated biological processes we applied over-representation analyses for each test set using all protein coding genes as a reference set. All resulting p-values were FDR adjusted [78].
Protein network analyses
Protein interaction networks were generated using the STRING database (v 11.5) [38], excluding text-mining from the selection of active interaction sources and hiding disconnected nodes within the networks.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Hans-und-Ruth-Giessen-Stiftung (2021) and the Hedwig-Stalter-Stiftung (2022) to Diener C. This work was supported by the Michael J. Fox foundation (MJFF-021418) to Keller A.
Author contributions
C.D., M.H., T.K., M.U., A.K., M.S., B.W.R., H.P.L., and E.M. designed the study; C.D. performed the experiments with support from A.B.D., T.T., D.S., L.K., and M.H.; T.K., C.D., B.W.R, M.H., and H.P.L. analyzed the data; T.K. and C.D. visualized the data; E.M. and C.D. wrote the manuscript; all authors edited and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Data availability
The datasets of the current study are available on the GEO database repository. The super-series number of the study is #GSE202667. Accession numbers for time-resolved transcriptome profiles and time-resolved miRNA profiles are #GSE202665 and #GSE202666, respectively.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41420-023-01333-0.
References
- 1.GBD 2016 Parkinson’s Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of Parkinson’s disease, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17:939–53. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30295-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dorsey ER, Bloem BR. The Parkinson pandemic-A call to action. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:9–10. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dorsey ER, Sherer T, Okun MS, Bloem BR. The emerging evidence of the Parkinson pandemic. J Parkinsons Dis. 2018;8:S3–S8. doi: 10.3233/JPD-181474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Balestrino R, Schapira AHV. Parkinson disease. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27:27–42. doi: 10.1111/ene.14108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Langston JW, Forno LS, Tetrud J, Reeves AG, Kaplan JA, Karluk D. Evidence of active nerve cell degeneration in the substantia nigra of humans years after 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine exposure. Ann Neurol. 1999;46:598–605. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(199910)46:4<598::AID-ANA7>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Spillantini MG, Schmidt ML, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ, Jakes R, Goedert M. Alpha-synuclein in Lewy bodies. Nature. 1997;388:839–40. doi: 10.1038/42166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bonam SR, Muller S. Parkinson’s disease is an autoimmune disease: a reappraisal. Autoimmun Rev. 2020;19:102684. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tan EK, Chao YX, West A, Chan LL, Poewe W, Jankovic J. Parkinson disease and the immune system - associations, mechanisms and therapeutics. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16:303–18.. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-0344-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jensen MP, Jacobs BM, Dobson R, Bandres-Ciga S, Blauwendraat C, Schrag A, et al. Lower lymphocyte count is associated with increased risk of Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2021;89:803–12.. doi: 10.1002/ana.26034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Brochard V, Combadiere B, Prigent A, Laouar Y, Perrin A, Beray-Berthat V, et al. Infiltration of CD4+ lymphocytes into the brain contributes to neurodegeneration in a mouse model of Parkinson disease. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:182–92. doi: 10.1172/JCI36470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tansey MG, Romero-Ramos M. Immune system responses in Parkinson’s disease: early and dynamic. Eur J Neurosci. 2019;49:364–83.. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lindestam Arlehamn CS, Dhanwani R, Pham J, Kuan R, Frazier A, Rezende Dutra J, et al. alpha-Synuclein-specific T cell reactivity is associated with preclinical and early Parkinson’s disease. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1875. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15626-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Parnetti L, Gaetani L, Eusebi P, Paciotti S, Hansson O, El-Agnaf O, et al. CSF and blood biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:573–86.. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30024-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schwab AD, Thurston MJ, Machhi J, Olson KE, Namminga KL, Gendelman HE, et al. Immunotherapy for Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2020;137:104760. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bolte AC, Lukens JR. Th17 cells in Parkinson’s disease: the bane of the midbrain. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23:5–6. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Storelli E, Cassina N, Rasini E, Marino F, Cosentino M. Do Th17 lymphocytes and IL-17 contribute to Parkinson’s disease? A systematic review of available evidence. Front Neurol. 2019;10:13. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Diener C, Hart M, Kehl T, Rheinheimer S, Ludwig N, Krammes L, et al. Quantitative and time-resolved miRNA pattern of early human T cell activation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:10164–83.. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bar-Joseph Z, Gitter A, Simon I. Studying and modelling dynamic biological processes using time-series gene expression data. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:552–64. doi: 10.1038/nrg3244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hess K, Yang Y, Golech S, Sharov A, Becker KG, Weng NP. Kinetic assessment of general gene expression changes during human naive CD4+ T cell activation. Int Immunol. 2004;16:1711–21. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxh172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ullman KS, Northrop JP, Verweij CL, Crabtree GR. Transmission of signals from the T lymphocyte antigen receptor to the genes responsible for cell proliferation and immune function: the missing link. Annu Rev Immunol. 1990;8:421–52. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.08.040190.002225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Szabo PA, Levitin HM, Miron M, Snyder ME, Senda T, Yuan J, et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of human T cells reveals tissue and activation signatures in health and disease. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4706. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12464-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Selbach M, Schwanhausser B, Thierfelder N, Fang Z, Khanin R, Rajewsky N. Widespread changes in protein synthesis induced by microRNAs. Nature. 2008;455:58–63. doi: 10.1038/nature07228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Guo H, Ingolia NT, Weissman JS, Bartel DP. Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels. Nature. 2010;466:835–40. doi: 10.1038/nature09267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kern F, Aparicio-Puerta E, Li Y, Fehlmann T, Kehl T, Wagner V, et al. miRTargetLink 2.0-interactive miRNA target gene and target pathway networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W409–W16.. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cambronne XA, Shen R, Auer PL, Goodman RH. Capturing microRNA targets using an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC)-trap approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:20473–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218887109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Huang Y, Clarke F, Karimi M, Roy NH, Williamson EK, Okumura M, et al. CRK proteins selectively regulate T cell migration into inflamed tissues. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:1019–32. doi: 10.1172/JCI77278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gironella M, Seux M, Xie MJ, Cano C, Tomasini R, Gommeaux J, et al. Tumor protein 53-induced nuclear protein 1 expression is repressed by miR-155, and its restoration inhibits pancreatic tumor development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:16170–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703942104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang Y, Scheiber MN, Neumann C, Calin GA, Zhou D. MicroRNA regulation of ionizing radiation-induced premature senescence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:839–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xu G, Fewell C, Taylor C, Deng N, Hedges D, Wang X, et al. Transcriptome and targetome analysis in MIR155 expressing cells using RNA-seq. RNA. 2010;16:1610–22. doi: 10.1261/rna.2194910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Saito Y, Suzuki H, Tsugawa H, Imaeda H, Matsuzaki J, Hirata K, et al. Overexpression of miR-142-5p and miR-155 in gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma resistant to Helicobacter pylori eradication. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e47396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang CM, Zhao J, Deng HY. MiR-155 promotes proliferation of human breast cancer MCF-7 cells through targeting tumor protein 53-induced nuclear protein 1. J Biomed Sci. 2013;20:79. doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-20-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang C, Zhao J, Deng H. 17beta-estradiol up-regulates miR-155 expression and reduces TP53INP1 expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2013;379:201–11. doi: 10.1007/s11010-013-1642-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liu F, Kong X, Lv L, Gao J. MiR-155 targets TP53INP1 to regulate liver cancer stem cell acquisition and self-renewal. FEBS Lett. 2015;589:500–6. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shahbazi J, Lock R, Liu T. Tumor protein 53-induced nuclear protein 1 enhances p53 function and represses tumorigenesis. Front Genet. 2013;4:80. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gerstner N, Kehl T, Lenhof K, Muller A, Mayer C, Eckhart L, et al. GeneTrail 3: advanced high-throughput enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:W515–W20.. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:27–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Croft D, O’Kelly G, Wu G, Haw R, Gillespie M, Matthews L, et al. Reactome: a database of reactions, pathways and biological processes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Database issue):D691–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Nastou KC, Lyon D, Kirsch R, Pyysalo S, et al. The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D605–D12.. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Martinez GJ, Dong C. BATF: bringing (in) another Th17-regulating factor. J Mol Cell Biol. 2009;1:66–8. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjp016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Castro G, Liu X, Ngo K, De Leon-Tabaldo A, Zhao S, Luna-Roman R, et al. RORgammat and RORalpha signature genes in human Th17 cells. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0181868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mancuso R, Agostini S, Hernis A, Zanzottera M, Bianchi A, Clerici M. Circulatory miR-223-3p discriminates between Parkinson’s and alzheimer’s patients. Sci Rep. 2019;9:9393. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45687-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ifergan I, Chen S, Zhang B, Miller SD. Cutting edge: microRNA-223 regulates myeloid dendritic cell-driven Th17 responses in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2016;196:1455–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Satoorian T, Li B, Tang X, Xiao J, Xing W, Shi W, et al. MicroRNA223 promotes pathogenic T-cell development and autoimmune inflammation in central nervous system in mice. Immunology. 2016;148:326–38. doi: 10.1111/imm.12611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Thome AD, Harms AS, Volpicelli-Daley LA, Standaert DG. microRNA-155 regulates alpha-synuclein-induced inflammatory responses in models of Parkinson disease. J Neurosci. 2016;36:2383–90. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3900-15.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Caggiu E, Paulus K, Mameli G, Arru G, Sechi GP, Sechi LA. Differential expression of miRNA 155 and miRNA 146a in Parkinson’s disease patients. eNeurologicalSci. 2018;13:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2018.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yan K, An T, Zhai M, Huang Y, Wang Q, Wang Y, et al. Mitochondrial miR-762 regulates apoptosis and myocardial infarction by impairing ND2. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:500. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1734-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Maynard S, Schurman SH, Harboe C, de Souza-Pinto NC, Bohr VA. Base excision repair of oxidative DNA damage and association with cancer and aging. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:2–10. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jia C, Cheng C, Li T, Chen X, Yang Y, Liu X, et al. alpha-synuclein up-regulates monoamine oxidase a expression and activity via trans-acting transcription factor 1. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:653379. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.653379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chattopadhyay S, Bielinsky AK. Human Mcm10 regulates the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase-alpha and prevents DNA damage during replication. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:4085–95. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e06-12-1148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lundin C, Schultz N, Arnaudeau C, Mohindra A, Hansen LT, Helleday T. RAD51 is involved in repair of damage associated with DNA replication in mammalian cells. J Mol Biol. 2003;328:521–35. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00313-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zapotoczny G, Sekelsky J. Human cell assays for synthesis-dependent strand annealing and crossing over during double-strand break repair. G3 (Bethesda) 2017;7:1191–9. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.037390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dhanwani R, Lima-Junior JR, Sethi A, Pham J, Williams G, Frazier A, et al. Transcriptional analysis of peripheral memory T cells reveals Parkinson’s disease-specific gene signatures. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2022;8:30. doi: 10.1038/s41531-022-00282-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sarraf SA, Sideris DP, Giagtzoglou N, Ni L, Kankel MW, Sen A, et al. PINK1/Parkin Influences Cell Cycle by Sequestering TBK1 at Damaged Mitochondria, Inhibiting Mitosis. Cell Rep. 2019;29:225–35 e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Pickrell AM, Youle RJ. The roles of PINK1, parkin, and mitochondrial fidelity in Parkinson’s disease. Neuron. 2015;85:257–73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Buneeva O, Fedchenko V, Kopylov A, Medvedev A. Mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: focus on mitochondrial DNA. Biomedicines. 2020;8:591. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8120591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Antony PM, Diederich NJ, Kruger R, Balling R. The hallmarks of Parkinson’s disease. FEBS J. 2013;280:5981–93. doi: 10.1111/febs.12335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Seif F, Khoshmirsafa M, Aazami H, Mohsenzadegan M, Sedighi G, Bahar M. The role of JAK-STAT signaling pathway and its regulators in the fate of T helper cells. Cell Commun Signal. 2017;15:23. doi: 10.1186/s12964-017-0177-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Iyer SS, Cheng G. Role of interleukin 10 transcriptional regulation in inflammation and autoimmune disease. Crit Rev Immunol. 2012;32:23–63. doi: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v32.i1.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Foley JF, Singh SP, Cantu M, Chen L, Zhang HH, Farber JM. Differentiation of human T cells alters their repertoire of G protein alpha-subunits. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:35537–50. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.128033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.McGeachy MJ, Cua DJ, Gaffen SL. The IL-17 family of cytokines in health and disease. Immunity. 2019;50:892–906. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Faraco G, Brea D, Garcia-Bonilla L, Wang G, Racchumi G, Chang H, et al. Dietary salt promotes neurovascular and cognitive dysfunction through a gut-initiated TH17 response. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21:240–9. doi: 10.1038/s41593-017-0059-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sommer A, Marxreiter F, Krach F, Fadler T, Grosch J, Maroni M, et al. Th17 lymphocytes induce neuronal cell death in a human iPSC-based model of Parkinson’s disease. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23:123–31 e6. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Main BS, Zhang M, Brody KM, Ayton S, Frugier T, Steer D, et al. Type-1 interferons contribute to the neuroinflammatory response and disease progression of the MPTP mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Glia. 2016;64:1590–604. doi: 10.1002/glia.23028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Chung Y, Chang SH, Martinez GJ, Yang XO, Nurieva R, Kang HS, et al. Critical regulation of early Th17 cell differentiation by interleukin-1 signaling. Immunity. 2009;30:576–87. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Joosten LA. Excessive interleukin-1 signaling determines the development of Th1 and Th17 responses in chronic inflammation. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:320–2. doi: 10.1002/art.27242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Yu W, He J, Cai X, Yu Z, Zou Z, Fan D. Neuroimmune crosstalk between the peripheral and the central immune system in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:890958. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.890958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Akitsu A, Iwakura Y. Interleukin-17-producing gammadelta T (gammadelta17) cells in inflammatory diseases. Immunology. 2018;155:418–26.. doi: 10.1111/imm.12993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.O’Brien RL, Roark CL, Born WK. IL-17-producing gammadelta T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39:662–6. doi: 10.1002/eji.200839120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Sutton CE, Lalor SJ, Sweeney CM, Brereton CF, Lavelle EC, Mills KH. Interleukin-1 and IL-23 induce innate IL-17 production from gammadelta T cells, amplifying Th17 responses and autoimmunity. Immunity. 2009;31:331–41. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Sutton CE, Mielke LA, Mills KH. IL-17-producing gammadelta T cells and innate lymphoid cells. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42:2221–31. doi: 10.1002/eji.201242569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Rizek P, Kumar N, Jog MS. An update on the diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson disease. CMAJ. 2016;188:1157–65.. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Cerri S, Mus L, Blandini F. Parkinson’s disease in women and men: what’s the difference? J Parkinsons Dis. 2019;9:501–15.. doi: 10.3233/JPD-191683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology. 1967;17:427–42. doi: 10.1212/WNL.17.5.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Goetz CG, Poewe W, Rascol O, Sampaio C, Stebbins GT, Counsell C, et al. Movement Disorder Society Task Force report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: status and recommendations. Mov Disord. 2004;19:1020–8. doi: 10.1002/mds.20213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Opgen-Rhein R, Strimmer K. Accurate ranking of differentially expressed genes by a distribution-free shrinkage approach. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2007;6:Article9. doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 1995;57:289–300. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat. 2001;29:1165–88. doi: 10.1214/aos/1013699998. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets of the current study are available on the GEO database repository. The super-series number of the study is #GSE202667. Accession numbers for time-resolved transcriptome profiles and time-resolved miRNA profiles are #GSE202665 and #GSE202666, respectively.