Abstract
Indigenous sheep are highly adaptable and widely distributed in different regions of Bangladesh. They are famous for their tolerance to harsh environmental conditions, low demand for feed, and disease resistance with minimum or no housing and management facilities. Ample indiscriminate research reports and case studies on the native sheep of Bangladesh have been published. Nonetheless, a comprehensive review of reproductive and productive performances, as well as their various morphometric physiognomies and climate resilience capabilities, is lacking. This review was designed to explore and summarize the available research reports on indigenous sheep to highlight the gaps and provide an updated database for the future research plan for sustainable native sheep production in Bangladesh. It covers studies on sheep biodiversity, their adaptability to the local environment, morphometric features, feeding and nutrition, reproduction and production performances, diseases and health management, and the problems and prospects of sheep farming in Bangladesh. Due to the increased demand for animal protein, especially red meat, the scope of sheep farming increases along with that of other large and small ruminants. The vital constraints of sheep production in Bangladesh include insufficient feed and fodder supply with its high prices, higher disease occurrence with low or no management practices, kid mortality, and a poor marketing channel with the lower popularity of sheep meat than goat meat. Future research would be a prerequisite to measuring the impact of native sheep on household economies and food security during the year, evaluating the other challenges, and finding out the possible interventions in the fields of nutrition, reproduction, and health management.
Keywords: Biodiversity, diseases, farming, heat stress, nutrition, sheep
Introduction
Livestock plays a dynamic role in promoting the national economy of Bangladesh as it is one of the most important sub-sectors of agriculture [1]. In the rural areas of Bangladesh, about 80% to 85% of the households that are landless, marginal, or small farmers keep livestock to support their household income [2]. Among the livestock species, the small ruminant is a major component that contributes diversified to this sector [3]. In the national economy, small ruminant farming may make a huge contribution by generating income and creating job opportunities.
Sheep are Bangladesh’s third largest livestock population and one of the most important providers of total meat supply; there are approximately 3.607 million sheep in Bangladesh, and this population has increased by approximately 20% over the last decade [4,5]. However, Asia and Africa are the central hub (64.43%) of sheep populations worldwide, while about 25% of the total population and 233 of about 920 breeds are found in Asia [6]. The distinct features of sheep rearing include its higher production potential with smaller feed requirements, lower disease risks, and broader adaptability to different climatic conditions. In addition to the good meat, milk, fiber, and skin that they provide, they also make sure that food is safe and that households are stable.
In Bangladesh, most of the sheep are native non-descript types with a small number of exotics and crossbreeds, and here people rear sheep as their family practice [7]. The indigenous sheep (Ovis aries) of Bangladesh are descended from Asia’s wild Ural (Ovis orientalis vignei), which is mostly found in three ecological zones: Barind, the Jamuna river basin, and coastal areas [8]. Moreover, farmers are also found to rear some exotics and crossbreds like Garole and Muzaffarbadi crosses, which are very popular among the livestock farmers of the southern part (Sundarban delta region) and western border areas (Meherpur, Chuadanga, and Chapainawabganj districts, respectively) [9]. However, indigenous sheep are the most adaptable, extensively disseminated, and noticeable in Bangladesh. They are well known for their little demand for feed, tolerance to harsh climate conditions, and disease resistance with remarkably good-quality red meat and skin. It has also had a significant impact on poverty alleviation, women’s and young people’s employment and empowerment, and food security by improving the livelihoods of poor and marginal farmers. Therefore, it is often considered the “bank of the poor man” in some areas of Bangladesh. But the information related to native sheep production provided by the farmers in Bangladesh is very inadequate. Furthermore, in small-scale farming, little or no attention has been paid to promoting lamb or mutton for consumers. Lack of public consciousness, misunderstanding about sheep meat (lamb or mutton), and insufficient nutrition supplementation are the limiting factors for sheep farming in Bangladesh. Recently, the Bangladesh government has emphasized sheep farming to meet future demand for animal protein due to population growth. This study was commenced to review, discuss, summarize, and compare the existing literature to determine the phenotypic characteristics, important morphological traits, and reproductive and productive performances of indigenous sheep, as well as their prospects and problems in Bangladesh.
Sheep Biodiversity in Bangladesh
In Bangladesh, most sheep population is mainly of the non-descriptive indigenous type, with some crossbreds [7,10]. The total sheep population of the country is about 3.68 million [11], with no remarkable changes in their population growth rate in the last 10 years, as shown in Figure 1. According to concentration, morphology, production, and reproduction performance, the indigenous sheep are categorized into three distinct types, viz. Coastal, Jamuna River Basin, and Barind [12,13], along with indigenous sheep, another common breed is Garole, which is found in the neighboring districts of Bangladesh’s Sundarban delta area and the Indian state of West Bengal [15,16] (Table 1). Phylogenetic analysis using mtDeoxyribonucleic Acid (mtDNA) sequence information found O. aries as the single ancestor of Bangladeshi indigenous sheep [17]. There is a high genetic dissimilarity within populations and a low genetic dissimilarity among sheep populations disseminated regionally [17]. Based on microsatellite marker evaluation, Barind and Jamuna river basin sheep belong to a related genetic group, while coastal sheep belong to other genetic groups [14]. However, based on mitochondrial DNA sequence, all Bangladeshi sheep populations are in the same group, and there is an evolutionary relationship with Indian, Chinese, and Turkish sheep breeds [17].
Figure 1. Growth rate (%) of sheep in last 10 years (Source: Department of Livestock Services, 2021).
Table 1. Sheep biodiversity and distribution in Bangladesh.
| Genotype | Breed/type | Distribution | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indigenous/native | Coastal | Coastal regions (Noakhali, Charlands, and other coastal plain area) | |
| Jamuna river basin | Jamuna river basin areas (Tangail, Sirajganj, Gaibandha, Sherpur, Jamalpur, Mymensingh, and Dhaka specially, both sides of Jamuna river in Bangladesh) | [4,12,13,21,22] | |
| Barind | Barind tracts (Naogaon, Rajshahi, Chapai Nawabganj) | ||
| Garole | Sundarban delta region, southern part of Bangladesh | [9,16,23,24] | |
| Exotic | Suffolk | ||
| Perendale | BLRI, Savar, Dhaka | [19] | |
| Dorper | |||
| Muzaffarbadi | Western border areas (Meherpur, Choadanga and Chapainawabganj) | [9,20,25] | |
| Nagpuri/Chotanagpuri (Locally known as Garole in some areas) | Meherpur and Chapainawabganj district and the Sundarban delta region, southern part of Bangladesh | [9,14] | |
| Crossbred | Muzaffarbadi cross | Western border areas (Meherpur, Choadanga, and Chapainawabganj districts) | [9,20,25] |
| Nagpuri/Chotanagpuri cross | Meherpur and Chapainawabganj district and its adjacent regions | [14] |
Several attempts had been made to improve the indigenous sheep germplasm with high-performing exotic sheep. In 1965, the Lohi breed of Pakistan; in 1976, the Romney Marsh breed of New Zealand; and in 1984, the Suffolk and Perendale breeds of Australia were imported to improve the indigenous sheep of coastal areas through crossbreeding, but the programs did not sustain themselves for a longer period [9,13–18]. Hence, the impact of the exotic sheep germplasm on the indigenous sheep is inconsiderable. In 2016, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute (BLRI) imported Suffolk, Perendale, and Dorper from Australia to adapt the exotic germplasm and produce crossbreds to improve the production performances of indigenous sheep [19].
Nowadays, many exotic and crossbred sheep are entering Bangladesh from neighboring countries through illegal transportation, resulting in the availability of exotic sheep breeds and their crossbreds in the border areas. Muzaffarabad and Nagpuri sheep breeds, as well as crossbreds, have been discovered in Meherpur, Chuadanga, Chapainawabganj, and other border districts [10,14–20], disrupting the planned breeding system and causing genetic erosion of our valuable native sheep germplasm.
Adapting to the Local Environment and Climate Change
Currently, the economic viability of the sheep production system is threatened due to the devastating effects of climate change because sheep are susceptible to the adverse impacts of climate change. Heat stress, cyclones, droughts, heavy rainfall, and unpredictable climates are the important factors that affect sheep husbandry, growth, and productivity [26]. Moreover, climate change leads to several vector-borne diseases and causes immune suppression in sheep [27,28]. But in extreme environmental conditions, sheep perform better under heat stress than other ruminants [29,30]. Usually, the more specialized and carefully chosen breeds are the ones that can handle being crowded the best and don’t react as much to predators or other things that make them scared.
Domestic sheep breed differences are discovered due to selection for breed traits and adaptation to various criteria, such as environmental adaptation, seasonality responses, and ability to cope with food scarcity [31]. Sheep’s behavioral, morphological, physiological, and largely genetic bases enable them to be highly adaptable [32] in both high mountains of hypoxia and extreme lowlands of a thermally stressed environment [33–35]. As with rodents, the integrated energy metabolisms of different sheep breeds are responsible for adaptation to extreme climates [36]. Sunlight, precipitation, and temperature—these three climatic variables—have effects directly on the thermoregulation of sheep and indirectly on metabolic regulation via depressing fodder quality and biomass yield [37]. Extreme sunlight plays a vital role in physiological events in sheep, like reproduction, and serves as a primary indication for the timing of reproduction events in sheep [38,39]. Increasing respiratory rate, panting, increasing sweating rate, changes in endocrine function, and reducing metabolic rate are the thermoregulation mechanisms used by sheep to maintain their body temperature in heat-stressed environments [40,41].
Morphological characteristics like body size and shape influence the thermoregulatory mechanisms of farm animals under heat stress [42]. Berihulay et al. [35] and Mwacharo et al. [43] reported that taller animals dissipate more heat with lower metabolic rates than animals with short, squat bodies, who gain heat at a slower rate. Besides, dark-colored sheep are more susceptible to heat stress because they absorb more heat than those with light pigmentation [44]. However, sheep with carpet-type wool, light-colored fleece, thinner skin, shorter hairs, and fatter tails are found to be better heat dissipators in hot weather [45]. About 25% of the world’s sheep population comprises fat-tailed breeds, and in extreme environments, it helps in the adaptive response of animals. It is a valuable energy reservoir for them in migration and the winter season [46].
Indigenous sheep breeds outperform exotic and crossbred sheep in terms of adaptability to the agro-climatic zones where they have evolved. Although the production performances of indigenous sheep breeds are lower than those of exotic and crossbred sheep, they keep a stable production by utilizing available poor-quality roughages with minimum concentrate supplementations under stressful climatic conditions, where high-producing sheep fail to maintain their minimum production performances [47].
Morphometric Features
Physical appearances
Physical appearances or features are the most commonly used breed or strain standards, and the main category of animal phenotypic expression results from both genotype and environment [12]. The coat color of indigenous sheep is mainly cream or white, but brown, white brown, dark brown, black-brown, gray, and gray with black or white patches are also found [12,13,48,49]. The face, ears, and feet are primarily light black. Males have horns, but females are polled. Ears are of small, medium, and long types. The tail is short and thin, but the wools are coarse with high medullation [13,48]. There is no such significant variation in coat color between areas. Still, in the case of ears, significantly shorter ears are found in Barind than in the Jamuna river basin and coastal areas [13]. Pervage et al. [12] found whitish, brown, blackish-red, and black-and-white mixed skin colors of sheep in the Jamuna River Basin and Barind region, but in the coastal area, mostly white or light to deep brown was available. In terms of body measurements, males outnumber females [50] (Table 2), and sheep from the coastal region have larger body measurements than those from the Barind and Jamuna River Basin regions [12,13,49]. However, differences between physical appearances might be due to hereditary and non-hereditary factors, such as breed, season, birth type, birth weight, and management [10].
Table 2. Morphometric features of native sheep.
| Type of native sheep | Sex | Wither height (cm) | Heart girth (cm) | Body length (cm) | Ear length (cm) | Head length (cm) | Head width (cm) | Tail length (cm) | Scrotal circumference (cm) | Testis length (cm) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamuna River Basin | Male | 46.80 ± 1.30 | 61.53 ± 1.23 | 43.33 ± 1.15 | 18.20 ± 0.51 | 10.67 ± 0.45 | [10] | ||||
| Female | 49.15 ± 0.31 | 57.88 ± 0.44 | 51.65 ± 0.46 | ||||||||
| Jamuna River Basin | Male | 52.10 ± 5.37 | 57.0 ± 6.32 | 50.61 ± 5.92 | 9.74 ± 2.25 | 18.63 ± 3.03 | 13.34 ± 3.10 | [22] | |||
| Female | 49.15 ± 3.48 | 54.82 ± 4.48 | 49.26 ± 4.40 | 8.55 ± 3.39 | 18.19 ± 2.21 | 12.83 ± 2.09 | |||||
| Barind sheep | Male | 54.78 ± 1.88 | 67.80 ± 4.46 | 54.90 ± 3.13 | 7.13 ± 3.21 | 20.06 ± 1.28 | 12.15 ± 1.09 | [21] | |||
| Female | 52.53 ± 2.52 | 70.41 ± 6.96 | 55.69 ± 3.06 | 7.30 ± 3.17 | 18.90 ± 1.45 | 11.36 ± .78 | |||||
| Indigenous (Non-descriptive) | Male | 58.47 ± 0.75 | 68.59 ± 0.74 | 58.88 ± 0.83 | 11.23 ± 0.32 | 16.15 ± 0.24 | 10.83 ± 0.23 | 16.33 ± 0.18 | [49] | ||
| Female | 49.02 ± 0.28 | 59.77 ± 0.27 | 49.08 ± 0.30 | 8.63 ± 0.17 | 15.04 ± 0.12 | 10.55 ± 0.15 | |||||
| Coastal | 53.5 | 64.9 | 45.9 | 8.4 | 16.3 | 7.8 | 12.0 | 10.7 | [13] | ||
| Jamuna River Basin | 51.7 | 62.7 | 41.5 | 8.4 | 16.0 | 7.7 | 12.0 | 10.7 | |||
| Barind | 52.9 | 61.5 | 43.4 | 3.2 | 16.1 | 7.4 | 11.5 | 11.0 | |||
| Coastal | 56.30 | 67.50 | 67.60 | 11.40 | 25.20 | [12] | |||||
| Jamuna River Basin | 47.71 | 58.57 | 64.42 | 8.28 | 20.85 | ||||||
| Barind | 48.50 | 60.20 | 65.70 | 6.40 | 19.75 |
Lamb birth weight
Lamb birth weight is an early measurable growth trait positively correlated with further growth, organ development, and satisfactory production [51]. In native lamb, it ranges from 1.04 to 2.3 kg [12,13,22,49,52]. Among the agro-ecological areas, the average lamb birth weight is highest in the coastal region, followed by the Barind and Jamuna River Basin regions [13]. Higher birth weights were found in male lambs than in females [12,13,22]. However, lamb birth weight can vary depending on the season of birth, litter size (LS), lamb sex, nutritional status of the dam, management, and area [13,22,52–54]. Low birth weights and increased lamb mortality are caused by the dam’s poor nutritional status and health [52,53]. Though advanced research in the genetic and molecular fields has taken place in different countries, there is no such work on the growth performance or birth weight of lamb in Bangladesh.
Body weight
Growth is the only outstanding important trait, a response indicator for sheep and other farm animals’ production [55]. The mature body weight of native ram is ranged from 14 to 25 kg, and in the case of ewe, it ranges from 14 to 20 gm, respectively [4,12,21,22,49,56,57]. Among the different types of native sheep according to the agro-ecological area, the Coastal sheep comprise the highest growth performance, followed by Jamuna River Basin and Barind [12,13,49]. Average daily weight gain is ranged from 44 to 92 gm/day, which can vary with the effect of location, type of sheep, sex, season, nutrition status and milk production of the dam, quality of feed, management system, and heat stress [4,8,12,58].
Feeding and Nutrition
Feeding behavior
Sheep do not have a particular feeding habit, and most importantly, they do not require a lot of feed. They can eat grass and leaves from the pasture themselves. Ouédraogo-Koné et al. [59] and Mysterud [60] stated that small ruminants such as sheep and goats have different feed consumption patterns in pasture areas; sheep are mainly grazers, while goats are more likely to browse. Sheep can consume different diets based on local plants, which allows these animals to adapt to new habitats under many environmental conditions, presenting greater flexibility in their behavior [61,62]. If they have a choice of feed resources, they will be selective in their feeding behavior. Khaskheli et al. [63] noted that goats spend more time eating than sheep while ruminating time remains longer in sheep than goats. Sheep, on the other hand, tolerate less bitter feed than goats and frequently browse plants rather than grass [64]. Sheep begin grazing by performing a visual assessment of the pasture, establishing references to the quality and quantity of available forage. If the forage height is below the established mean, the animal moves in search of a place that ensures good forage intake [65]. It can efficiently nibble tiny blades of grass with its small muzzles and split upper lips compared to other animals [24]. Sheep have a natural preference for grass and are thus grazers, obtaining natural or cultivated forage directly from the field. Sheep are more negatively affected by drought because herbaceous plants are more sensitive to periodic moisture stress than woody plants. Grazing ruminants, goats, and sheep are known to consume a particularly broad range of browse leaves and are reported to select those that meet their nutritional needs and avoid those that can be toxic [66].
Feed intake and nutrient digestibility
Feed intake measures an animal’s appreciation, selection, and consumption of its diet [67]. It is considered one of the main factors determining the potential of animal performance. Sheep were usually grazed around homesteads, roadside pastures, and fallow land. They also feed on tree leaves like mango, jackfruit, and ipil ipil [68]. Sheep are allowed to graze during the day on natural pasture, homestead forest, and fallow land. Sheep were assigned randomly into two feeding systems: the traditional feeding system and the improved feeding system. Based on the traditional feeding regime, sheep are reared on fallow lands, roadsides, and canals [69]. In the improved feeding system group, each sheep consumed 250 gm of ready-to-feed concentrate feed in addition to grazing [70]. In Bangladesh, people mostly rear their sheep in traditional ways with little or no concentrate supplementation. Sheep production can be made more profitable by adding concentrate as a supplementary source of feed energy. Based on chemical composition, nutrient digestibility, and nutrient utilization efficiency, tree leaves prove to be excellent feed ingredients, especially for small ruminants, and provide potential feed for livestock during long dry seasons and wet seasons when insufficient plant biomass is available. Islam et al. [71] reported that 97.8% of the sheep farmers fed leaves and grasses to their sheep, and about 2.2% of the sheep farmers used concentrates as supplementary feed in addition to grass and leaves. Another study also found that 60% of the sheep grazed roadside grass, and only 33% grazed roadside and cultivated fodder during the rainy season [72]. Dry matter (DM) consumption was reported to be higher in sheep compared to goats under different available feeding regimes in Bangladesh. In contrast, under an intensive feeding system, crude protein (CP) consumption was found to be significantly higher in sheep, but neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber (ADF) consumption was lower in sheep compared to goats [63]. Sultana et al. [58] stated that the digestibility of DM, organic matter (OM), CP, and ADF was low at the age of 6–9 months in castrated native Bengal lambs fed ad libitum urea molasses straw with a concentrated mixture of the rate of 1% of their body weight. Sultana et al. [73] reported a similar range of DM, OM, CP, and ADF digestibility and N-balance in the same age group of lambs fed different diets. Native lambs were fed pelleted total mixed rations (TMRs) instead of traditional loose concentrate with forage for fattening, and results showed that feed intake and average daily gain were higher when fed pelleted TMR, but nutrients apparent total tract digestibility and blood metabolites were not affected [74]. Similar findings were made by Islam et al. [75] on Garole sheep, who concluded that the complete feed system (TMR) is one of the latest developments in the feeding regime to make the best possible use of locally available feed resources.
Pre and postnatal nutrition
Due to the high nutritional requirements for colostrum and milk production, parturition and lactation are considered the most critical and stressful periods of the ewe’s life cycle because energy is the primary requirement of animals. The energy used by the animal is derived primarily from energy intake and secondarily from the mobilization and metabolism of body reserves [76]. Lamb growth, weaning, and survival influence ewe nutrition during pregnancy and lactation [77,78]. The nutrients available to ewes during pregnancy positively affect both udder development and subsequent lactation performance [79]. Also, the dam`s ability to produce milk for its offspring is a key driver for neonatal growth and development [80]. Besides, colostrum production was significantly (p < 0.01) affected by nutritional manipulation, while the chemical composition of colostrum was not different except for total solids. Ewes can be supplemented with high energy or high protein for 2 months before parturition, which influences physiological states, increases lamb growth performance, decreases ewe loss, and increases colostrum production, which is beneficial to lamb survival [81]. Ahmed et al. [82] supplied different levels of pre- and post-natal diet to native Bengal ewes at 7 weeks of gestation under a semi-intensive system and found significantly higher daily milk yield (p < 0.01), weaning weight (p < 0.05) and daily weight gain of lamb until weaning (p < 0.05) in the group supplementing concentrate mixture at the rate of 1.5% of their body weight. To achieve the best performance from ewes and their lambs, the authors concluded that a concentrated diet containing 20% CP should be fed from late pregnancy through lactation. Several authors [52,83–87] found that inadequate nutrition during late pregnancy and lactation can reduce birth weight, mammary development, and milk yield [52,86]. Moreover, the plane of nutrition is very important for ewes during pregnancy and lactation, and feeding the ewes high-ME-content feed can improve growth and milk production performance without any negative effect on blood metabolites [88].
Reproductive Performances
Reproductive traits are revealed as the most economically important trait in animal production. Moreover, high reproductive performance is a significant feature and a major component of improving the production proficiency of livestock [89]. As a result, animals with an elect reproductive profile are considered a critical genetic resource for their genetic development. In sheep reproduction, age at first lambing (AFL), gestation length (GL), LS, lambing interval (LI), service per conception rate (SPCR), and post-partum heat of the breed is considered the key reproductive traits.
Age at first lambing (AFL)
AFL is one of the vital postpartum traits of animals when a breeding ewe gives birth to an offspring. The AFL of some indigenous sheep in diverse agro-ecological zones of Bangladesh is summarized in Table 3. There is no significant variation in AFL among them, and the average value is 423.32 ± 14.91 days. However, when the sheep of three agro-ecological zones were compared, Barind sheep had the lowest AFL values, and Jamuna river basin sheep had the highest [12,13,90]. However, in small ruminants, AFL is closely allied to growth rather than age, and it is an innate characteristic. Still, few variations arise due to the influence of different factors, like genotype or breed, feeding and nutrition, environmental issues (temperature, climatic condition, and season), better management, body weight gain, and the presence of a ram in the flock [89].
Table 3. Reproductive performances of different indigenous sheep in Bangladesh.
| Reproductive traits | Type of indigenous sheep | Value (mean ± SE) | NAR | Study population | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFL | Jamuna river basin | 438.17 ± 26.88 | 3 | 92 | [10,12,13,49] |
| Barind | 405.97 ± 27.78 | 4 | 178 | ||
| Coastal | 429.53 ± 27.12 | 4 | 205 | ||
| Average | 423.32 ± 14.91 | 11 | 475 | ||
| GL | Jamuna river basin | 152.13 ± 0.67 | 2 | 92 | |
| Barind | 147.66 ± 2.66 | 2 | 178 | ||
| Coastal | 147.78 ± 1.78 | 2 | 205 | ||
| Average | 149.19 ± 1.25 | 6 | 475 | ||
| LS | Jamuna river basin | 1.97 ± 0.22 | 3 | 92 | |
| Barind | 1.82 ± 0.12 | 4 | 178 | ||
| Coastal | 1.99 ± 0.23 | 4 | 205 | ||
| Average | 1.92 ± 0 .10 | 11 | 475 | ||
| LI | Jamuna river basin | 195.87 ± 13.00 | 3 | 92 | |
| Barind | 194.18 ± 13.64 | 4 | 178 | ||
| Coastal | 193.18 ± 11.92 | 4 | 205 | ||
| Average | 194.27 ± 6.72 | 11 | 475 | ||
| SPCR | Jamuna river basin | 1.31 ± 0.09 | 3 | 92 | |
| Barind | 1.29 ± 0.09 | 4 | 178 | ||
| Coastal | 1.28 ± 0.08 | 4 | 205 | ||
| Average | 1.29 ± 0.04 | 11 | 475 | ||
| PPH | Jamuna river basin | 35.63 ± 2.62 | 3 | 92 | |
| Barind | 37.20 ± 5.02 | 4 | 178 | ||
| Coastal | 41.95 ± 1.73 | 4 | 205 | ||
| Average | 38.50 ± 2.04 | 11 | 475 |
SE, standard error; NAR, number of articles that reported the parameters.
Gestation length (GL)
In an ewe, the approximate GL is 147 days, and it is not affected by age, birth weight, body condition score, litter type, or lamb genotype [91]. However, in male progeny and single progeny (non-multiple births), a longer GL is observed [92]. In Bangladeshi native sheep, there is no significant variation in GL, and the average GL of indigenous sheep is 149.19 ± 1.25 ranging from 147 to 152 days. The highest GL is observed in the Jamuna river basin; in Barind and coastal regions, the value is almost similar.
Litter size (LS)
LS is mainly influenced by the ovulation rate and is the main determinant of reproductive proficiency. Ovulation rates differ between sheep breeds; they increase with ewe age and are higher in the first half of the breeding season for seasonally breeding ewes [93]. As a result, LS increases with dam age (up to the fourth parity) and then decreases slightly [94]. The average LS of Bangladeshi native sheep is 1.92, ranging from 1.82 to 1.99, and there is no significant difference in LS considering different types of sheep in Bangladesh. However, coastal sheep have the largest LS, and Barind sheep have the smallest litter.
Lambing interval (LI)
The number of days between consecutive parturitions is known as the LI, which is one of the major components of reproductive performance and has an important impact on a sheep production enterprise. LI is affected by the breed, season, parity, and post-partum weight of the dam [95]. The average LI of Bangladeshi sheep is 149 days. Furthermore, there is no significant difference between different types of Bangladeshi sheep, with the highest LI (195.87) found in the Jamuna river basin and the lowest LI (193.18) found in coastal sheep.
Service per conception rate (SPCR)
SPCR is usually considered to be the number of ewes exposed to the ram for successful lambing. The average SPCR of Bangladeshi sheep is about 1.29 (Table 3). Many factors, such as age, LI, breed, and production system, influence the SPCR of sheep. However, the SPCR in different types of indigenous sheep in the country is nearly identical.
Postpartum heat (PPH)
The PPH or postpartum interval is the period from parturition until the first postpartum estrus accompanied by ovulation. The length of the PPH varies among domestic animals. In the ewe, the PPH for most breeds extends from lambing in the spring until the resumption of estrous activity in the autumn. The average PPH among the indigenous sheep of Bangladesh is about 38.50 days, whereas the highest PPH (41.95) is observed on coastal sheep and the lowest (35.63) on Jamuna river basin sheep (Table 3).
Production Performances
Lamb production
Native sheep are a non-popular species raised primarily for meat production in Bangladesh [8,54], but several necessary steps have recently been taken to boost sheep production [54,70]. Different research findings revealed that economic lamb production could be achieved by semi-intensive and intensive rearing systems with an optimum slaughter or market age ranging from 6 to 9 months [49,52,58,82,96]. All the available types of native lambs have the potential for commercial lamb production, especially coastal lambs, which grow faster in terms of daily weight gain [8]. With concentrate supplementation at 1.5% body weight of the ewe throughout late pregnancy [52,82]; straw-based complete pellet feed that comprises 40% roughage (rice straw) and 60% concentrate [74]; and Moringa leaf or Moring foliage as an alternative for conventional concentrate mixtures [69,73,97]. Because the cost-effectiveness of lamb production is strongly affected by nutritional management during the production cycle, breed, sex, LS, birth weight, body weight, age, season, location, flock size, and management system also influence the growth and production performances of lamb [4].
Carcass characteristics
Among the available small ruminants, there is a clear difference in price and acceptance between sheep and goat meat, though both types are nearly similar in characteristics and quality [57]. More specifically, saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and some sensory characteristics, viz. Sheep meat has superior juiciness, tenderness, and other characteristics to goat meat [57,98]. The proximate composition of native sheep meat in different feeding systems is described in Table 4. In general, the slaughter age varied from 1 to 3 years with a live body weight of 8–22 kg with the traditional rearing system [57,99], but to gain economic benefit, the optimum slaughter age of native sheep is 6–9 months with a live body weight of 18.6–23.4 kg [58,82,100]. Sheep dressing percentages range from 39% to 68%, depending on age, breed, sex, feeding, and production system [57,58,82,99]. However, no significant difference is reported in meat quality and sensory characteristics between different production systems [101].
Table 4. Proximate composition of sheep meat.
The major sheep population of Bangladesh is indigenous, and their wool is mainly coarse in nature. Approximately 2.5 thousand metric tons of raw wool are produced each year, with an average shearing rate of 440 gm per sheep and an average shearing rate of 800 gm per sheep per year [12,13,102,103], a fine wool percentage of around 17.07%, a hairy wool percentage of around 74.33%, and a staple length of 7.47 cm [13]. However, this potential by-product mostly goes to waste due to a lack of appropriate processing and applications [102,103]. Wool production also has a close association with the nutritional status of sheep [104,105]. Wool can be used in various finished products to meet daily needs in the modern era, thanks to the development of many locally made fibrous materials. In a joint research report, BLRI and Bangladesh Jute Research Institute reported that 30% wool, 30% jute, and 40% cotton fiber 12 sec blended yarn was economically more feasible for the development of blended yarn with jute, cotton, and wool, which may open a new window for the development of diversified handicraft products [102].
Diseases and Mortality
Different health problems in sheep are the main threat to sheep farmers in Bangladesh regarding production loss. Infectious diseases (bacterial and viral) and endo-parasitism wreak havoc on sheep health, resulting in significant production losses and financial losses for farmers due to lower reproductive rates, lower feed conversion efficiency, higher production costs, increased risk of zoonotic diseases, and public health risks. The most common clinical illness with so-called diarrhea and pneumonia [13], along with Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR), foot rot, and gastrointestinal infection, causes serious health hazards [106]. Different factors, including age, sex, and season, aggravate the lamb mortality rate of 12.4% in native sheep. In contrast, it is about 7.0% in July through October, 17.6% in November through February, and 12.5% in March through June, respectively [107].
Enterotoxaemia in sheep, also known as pulpy kidney disease or overeating disease, is mainly caused by Clostridial perfringens type D with high carbohydrate diets, which affects faster-growing lambs that exhibit uncoordinated movements and convulsions before death [108]. In Bangladesh, the prevalence of enterotoxaemia is around 0.07%, with a year-to-year prevalence of around 0.05% and a season-to-season incidence of around 0.05% [108–110].
Brucellosis, or Malta fever in sheep, is mainly caused by Brucella spp., are facultative intracellular parasites that may cause abortion in the early stages of gestation, orchitis in male animals along with infertility, and also decrease the milk yield of ewes [111].
Pneumonia causes the death of about 30% of feedlot cattle and high mortality in sheep worldwide [112]. Pasteurella multocida and Pasteurella hemolytica, mainly commensal organisms, are the main etiological agents for pneumonia in sheep. The incidence of pneumonia in native sheep of Bangladesh is about 1.02%; however, it is more prominent in the winter season (0.53%) than in the rainy season (0.37%) [110].
PPR is the most lethal and devastating viral disease of small ruminants, including native sheep. It is primarily an endemic disease in Bangladesh, causing high fever, diarrhea, dehydration, coughing, sneezing, necrotic stomatitis, and, to a lesser extent, pneumonia that leads to bronchopneumonia [113,114]114]. PPR in sheep has a prevalence of about 9.17%–18.18% reported in different areas of Bangladesh [114].
Contagious ecthyma is a common viral disease of small ruminants, characteristically caused by a parapoxvirus of the subfamily Chordopoxvirinae, also known as orf, sore mouth, or contagious pustular dermatitis [115]. Lesions occur around the lips, gums, eyelids, and oral cavity and are also found in teats and feet [116], along with internal organs like the esophagus, stomach, and intestine of the affected animals, which may be found by post-mortem examinations [117]. Regarding seasonal variations [111], young animals are more susceptible to this disease than adults.
A poxvirus causes sheep pox, another viral infection of a zoonotic nature that belongs to the family Poxviridae under the genus Capripoxvirus, in small ruminants [118]. It is a sheep disease that causes nodule formation in unwooled skin, high body temperature, and some keratitis [119]. However, the prevalence of sheep pox is rare; it mainly occurs in confined flocks in Bangladesh.
Nevertheless, parasitism, specifically gastro-intestinal parasitic infection, seriously hampers sheep production in Bangladesh, which mainly depends on age, sex, season, pasture, and geographical location [120]. Islam et al. [106] reported that sheep with a free-range grazing system were highly susceptible to helminth infections (82.8%) rather than those with a semi-intensive management system. Seasonal variation is also a drawback for sheep rearing; about 97.41% prevalence was found in the rainy season, about 91.31% in the summer, and in the winter, it was about 82.35%. They also found that young sheep (89.27%) were more susceptible to helminth infection than adults (81.11%) and kids (72.41%). Moreover, other internal parasites like roundworms and hookworms have the same devastating impact with profuse diarrhea, dysentery, anorexia, and anemia. Garole sheep have some characteristics of grazing in lowland areas rather than highlands, which gives them some degree of resistance against internal parasites, including liver fluke [121] and trematode infection [122]. On the other hand, external parasites like ticks, mites, and lice cause economic losses to farmers with wool-producing sheep, where lice infestation was found at about 58%, and psoroptic mange caused infection at about 12%, respectively [123].
Nonetheless, the most common metabolic diseases of sheep are hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, and pregnancy toxemia, which primarily affect the periparturient stage of their lifecycle. Nutritional scarcity in the last few days before parturition and during the first lactation may occur [124]. Hypocalcemia, or a lack of calcium, is most common in ewes a few weeks before lambing and can last for months. In ewes, hypomagnesemia can occur between 2 and 8 weeks of hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, and pregnancy toxemia, which primarily affect the periparturient stage of their lifecycle. Nutritional scarcity in the last few days before parturition and during the first lactation may occur [124]. Hypocalcemia, or a lack of calcium, is most common in ewes a few weeks before lambing and can last for months. In ewes, hypomagnesemia can occur between 2 and 8 weeks post-lambing, especially during the spring, when rapid-growing spring grasses are relatively low in magnesium, which is a must in the daily diet of sheep. Pregnancy toxemia is another metabolic illness characterized by low blood glucose and high ketone bodies in the last 6 weeks of pregnancy. Ewes carrying multiple fetuses face problems when nutritional intakes are limited by maximum energy demands [125].
Prospects and Problems of Indigenous Sheep Farming in Bangladesh
There is a vast scope for sheep farming in developing countries like Bangladesh, which may create sustainable opportunities by generating income and finally contributing to the economy of the country. It is one of the most important small ruminants and has great potential to create a meat revolution in Bangladesh through profitable lamb production [4,22,126]. Moreover, by producing different diversified products, wool can contribute as a valuable by-product with economic benefits [13,127]. Indigenous sheep are an important part of rural communities’ socioeconomic structures [128], and they are regarded as “cash income” by rural farmers due to their easy availability for sale or exchange [129]. As they do not have a particular feeding habit, it is easy to maintain them in a small or medium space with naturally grown grasses, low-quality roughages, crop residues, tree toppings, farm and vegetable waste, aquatic weeds, and grasses in knee-deep water with a minimum concentrate mixture or any supplementation [49,71,100,106,130,131]131]. Sheep farming could become a sustainable way to produce animal protein, end poverty, give women more power, and help Bangladesh’s economy grow if farmers had more knowledge and training about available technologies, motivation, intensive management, and controlled breeding with superior rams [21,100,131,132]132].
Though sheep are a potential livestock species, there are some problems and limitations regarding sheep farming in Bangladesh. Because most sheep farmers are illiterate or undereducated, they cannot facilitate environmentally friendly flock management [133]. Sheep are less popular than goats in terms of cultural acceptance due to negative marketing messages about the flavor and quality of their meat [52,133]. Besides that, most farmers did not get loan facilities from any government or private organization as they were small-scale farmers or had inadequate assets to mortgage [126,133]. On the other hand, the genetic improvement of a species is largely dependent on breeding superior animals to produce the next generation. But less attention has been paid to improving the sheep at the field level, resulting in the loss of valuable germplasm. Only a few government institutes practice modern breeding and reproductive technologies, and they take some initiatives to improve native sheep [131,134]. Lack of sufficient breeding rams tends to result in crossbreeding or inbreeding of the native sheep, resulting in genetic erosion [135]. Another major constraint is a lack of feed, which is the result of a combination of factors such as a lack of pasture land, high feed costs, competition between human and animal feed, and high prices for vitamins, minerals, and other supplements [13,71,132,136]. Poor health management practices, along with inadequate knowledge and inadequate veterinary and diagnostic services, a lack of vaccine facilities, a high price for medicines, a lack of consciousness, and an effective prevention and control policy, cause economic losses in sheep farming in Bangladesh [8,110,132]. Furthermore, marketing strategies are another major obstacle to the smooth development of sheep production in Bangladesh, including a lack of market information, a lower price, and a lack of organized and structured markets for meat and wool [126,132].
Conclusion
Sheep farming plays an important role in improving the livelihoods of small farmers in Bangladesh, significantly contributing to fulfilling the national demand for animal protein. However, the reproductive and productive performance of native sheep differs depending on their sex, birth type and weight, parity, management system, location, and year’s season. The scarcity of quality rams under field conditions, lack of an improved breed, the high price of feed, lack of medicine, and lack of credit and marketing facilities hamper profitable sheep farming. Sheep production communities need to be developed to reduce existing challenges, and government and nongovernment organizations should organize related training for farmers and entrepreneurs. Because adequate housing, nutritional modification, and health management can improve reproductive and productive performance while reducing environmental stress responses, To combat the multiple challenges of sheep farming in Bangladesh, more research efforts are needed in the fields of nutrition, reproduction, and health management to provide time-based assistance to the farmers.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute for making it possible for them to finish their work.
List of abbreviations
ADF, Acid detergent fiber; AFL, Age at first lambing; BLRI, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute; CP, Crude Protein; DNA, Deoxyribonucleic Acid; DM, Dry Matter; GL, Gestation length; LS, Litter size; LI, Lambing interval; OM, Organic Matter; PPH, Postpartum heat; PPR, Peste des Petits Ruminants; SPCR, Service per Conception rate; TMR, Total mixed ration.
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest to declare.
Authors’ contribution
M.R.H.R. was involved in the supervision, conceptualization, and substantial revision of the original draft of the manuscript; N.H.D. prepared the draft of biodiversity, morphometric features, production performances, and prospects and problems of sheep farming in Bangladesh chapters; M.Z.R. was involved in supervision and funding acquisition; M.A.K. prepared the draft of chapters related to reproductive performances; F.Y. prepared the draft of adapting to the local environment and climate change chapter and did critical checking of the manuscript; M.A.A. prepared the draft of feeding and nutrition chapter; S.A. prepared the draft of disease and mortality chapter; N.S. was involved in the editing and critical checking of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
References
- [1].Sharma PK, Raha SK, Jorgensen H. An economic analysis of beef cattle fattening in selected areas of Pabna and Sirajgonj district. J Bangladesh Agric Univ. 2014;12(1):127–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v12i1.21402. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Hossain MD, Hossain MM, Hashem MA, Bhuiyan KJ. Organic beef cattle production pattern at Shahjadpur Upazila of Sirajgonj district in Bangladesh. Bang J Anim Sci. 2016;45(1):25–30. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjas.v45i1.27484. [Google Scholar]
- [3].Begum MAA, Hossain MM, Khan M, Rahman MM, Rahman SME. Cattle fattening practices of selected farmers in Panchagarh district. Bang J Anim Sci. 2007;36(1-2):62–72. [Google Scholar]
- [4].Hashem MA, Islam T, Hossain MA, Kamal MT, Sun MA, Rahman MM. Production performance of Jamuna basin lamb in Bangladesh under Semi-intensive Management System. J Anim Vet Adv. 2020;19(11):150–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.36478/javaa.2020.150.158. [Google Scholar]
- [5].DLS. Livestock Economy at a glance. DLS; 2020. Department of Livestock Services, Farmgate, Dhaka. [Google Scholar]
- [6].FAO. Food and Agricultural Organization. Vol. 57. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2003. Production yearbook; p. 210, 231, 216. [Google Scholar]
- [7].Bhuiyan AKFH. Livestock Genetic Resources in Bangladesh: preservation and management. International Conference on Livestock Services, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science (CAAS); Beijing, China. 2006. [Google Scholar]
- [8].Ahmed S, Rakib MRH, Yesmin M, Sultana N, Jahan N, Ershaduzamman M. Evaluation of lamb production potentiality of the barind, Jamuna river basin and coastal region sheep of Bangladesh under intensive management. J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2018;5:37–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/javar.2018.e243. [Google Scholar]
- [9].Hamid MA. Biological diversity of farm animals in Bangladesh: a review. SAARC J Agric. 2019;17(2):15–29. https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v17i2.45291. [Google Scholar]
- [10].Asaduzzaman M, Shahi PKJMG, Bari AFY. Multi-farm evaluation of morphometric, reproductive and productive traits of Jamuna basin indigenous and Muzaffarnagari cross breed sheep of Bangladesh. J Appl Anim Sci. 2020;13(1):31–50. [Google Scholar]
- [11].Department of Livestock Services (DLS) Livestock economy at a glance. Department of Livestock Services, 2020. 2021. Available via http://dls.portal.gov.bd .
- [12].Pervage S, Ershaduzzaman M, Talukder MAI, Hasan MN, Khandoker , MAMY. Phenotypic characteristics of indigenous sheep of Bangladesh. Bang J Anim Sci. 2009;38:1–6. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjas.v38i1-2.9906. [Google Scholar]
- [13].Hassan MR, Talukder MAI. Comparative performance of different regional native sheep in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Vet. 2011;28(2):85–94. https://doi.org/10.3329/bvet.v28i2.10692. [Google Scholar]
- [14].Deb GK, Choudhury MP, Kabir MA, Khan MYA, Ershaduzzaman M, Nahar TN, et al. Genetic relationship among indigenous sheep population of Bangladesh. Bang J Anim Sci. 2019;48(1):17–22. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjas.v48i1.44553. [Google Scholar]
- [15].Mukesh M, Sodhi M, Bhatia S. Microsatellite based diversity analysis and genetic relationships of three Indian sheep breeds. J Anim Breed Genet. 2006;123:258–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00599.x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00599.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Khan MYA, Han J, Husain SS, Alam MR, Teneva A, Faruque MO. Genetic relationship in different sheep population of Bangladesh based on microsatellite markers. J Bangladesh Agric Univ. 2009;7:291–4. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v7i2.4736. [Google Scholar]
- [17].Mousumee MA, Hossain MM, Hoque MR, Bhuiyan MSA. Genetic diversity and maternal origin of indigenous sheep of Bangladesh using mitochondrial DNA. Iran J Appl Anim Sci. 2021;11(2):311–8. [Google Scholar]
- [18].Bhuiyan AFH. Farm animal genetic diversity country report-Bangladesh. Farm animal genetic resources in SAARC countries: diversity, conservation and management. 2013:1–74. ISBN: 978-984-33-8230-6. [Google Scholar]
- [19].Giasuddin M, Rahman MM, Hassan MZ, Yesmin M, Ahmed S, Ershaduzzaman M. Recommendations on successful quarantine of pure exotic sheep breed at Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute in Bangladesh. J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2018;5(1):67–72. http://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2018.e249. [Google Scholar]
- [20].Sardar MJU. Report on importance of muzaffarnagar sheep farm in meat production of Bangladesh. Khamar Editorial. 2016:6–14. [Google Scholar]
- [21].Haque MI, Sarder MJU, Islam MA, Khaton R, Islam MH, Hashem MA. Socio-demographic study of the farmers of Barind area of Bangladesh. Environ Earth Sci. 2020;4(194):2577–0640. https://doi.org/10.29011/2577-0640.100194. [Google Scholar]
- [22].Sun MA, Hossain MA, Islam T, Rahman MM, Hossain MM, Hashem MA. Different body measurement and body weight prediction of Jamuna basin sheep in Bangladesh. SAARC J Agric. 2020;18(1):183–96. https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v18i1.48392. [Google Scholar]
- [23].Islam ABMM, Shahjalal M. Agricultural research in Bangladesh in the 20th century. Dhaka: Bangladesh Animal Husbandry Association; 2001. Ruminant production and research. [Google Scholar]
- [24].Banerjee GC. 8th. Oxford and IBH Publishing; 2018. A textbook of animal husbandry. [Google Scholar]
- [25].International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute; 2004. Status, trends, utilization and performance of FAnGR of Bangladesh. [Google Scholar]
- [26].Gowane GR, Gadekar YP, Prakash V, Kadam V, Chopra A. The role of maternal effects in sheep breeding- a review. Ind J Small Ruminants. 2014;20:31–69. [Google Scholar]
- [27].Sejian V, Bhatta R, Gaughan J, Malik P, Naqvi S, Lal R. Cham, Singapore: Springer; 2017. Sheep production adapting to climate change; pp. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4714-5_1. [Google Scholar]
- [28].Yasha A, De La F, Luanna S, Batista F, Af S, Elb S. Growth and reproduction hormones of ruminants subjected to heat stress. J Anim Behav Biometeorol. 2017;5:7–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.14269/2318-1265/jabb.v5n1p7-12. [Google Scholar]
- [29].Al-Dawood A. Towards heat stress management in small ruminants – a review. Ann Anim Sci. 2017;17(1):59–88. https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2016-0068. [Google Scholar]
- [30].Bakheit SA, Ibrahim IE, El Shafei IM, Musa MA. Research article effects of water deprivation and environmental temperature on physiological performance of sudanese desert goats. J Sci Eng Res. 2017;4:243–50. [Google Scholar]
- [31].Dwyer CM. Environment and the sheep. 2008:41–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8553-6_2. [Google Scholar]
- [32].Brito LF, Jafarikia M, Grossi DA, Kijas JW, Porto-Neto LR, Ventura RV, et al. Characterization of linkage disequilibrium, consistency of gametic phase and admixture in Australian and Canadian Goats. BMC Genet. 2015;16:67. doi: 10.1186/s12863-015-0220-1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-015-0220-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Seixas L, De Melo CB, Tanure CB, Peripolli V. Heat tolerance in Brazilian hair sheep. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2017;30:593–601. doi: 10.5713/ajas.16.0191. https://doi.org/10.5713%2Fajas.16.0191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].José C, Manuel A, Pereira F, De Mira A, Morita L, Antonio E, et al. Thermoregulatory response in hair sheep and shorn wool sheep cristiane gonc. Small Rumin Res. 2016;144:341–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.10.015. [Google Scholar]
- [35].Berihulay H, Abied A, He X, Jiang L, Ma Y. Adaptation mechanisms of small ruminants to environmental heat stress. Animals. 2019;9(3):1–9. doi: 10.3390/ani9030075. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9030075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Rezende EL, Bozinovic F, Garland T Jr. Climatic adaptation and the evolution of basal and maximum rates of metabolism in rodents. Evolution. 2004;58:1361–74. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01714.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01714.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Mysterud A, Austrheim G. The effect of domestic sheep on forage plants of wild reindeer; a landscape scale experiment. Eur J Wildl Res. 2008;54:461–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0171-1. [Google Scholar]
- [38].Gomez-Brunet A, Santiago-Moreno J, del Campo A, Malpaux B, Chemineau P, Tortonese DJ, et al. Endogenous circannual cycles of ovarian activity and changes in prolactin and melatonin secretion in wild and domestic female sheep maintained under a long-day photoperiod. Biol Reprod. 2008;78:552–62. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.107.064394. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.107.064394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Chemineau P, Malpaux B, Brillard JP, Fostier A. Photoperiodic treatments and reproduction in farm animals. Bull Acad Vet Fr. 2010;163:19–26. [Google Scholar]
- [40].Nejad JG, Sung KI. Behavioral and physiological changes during heat stress in corriedale ewes exposed to water deprivation. J Anim Sci Technol. 2017;59:13. doi: 10.1186/s40781-017-0140-x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40781-017-0140-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Sejian V, Kumar D, Gaughan JB, Naqvi SMK. Effect of multiple environmental stressors on the adaptive capability of malpura rams based on physiological responses in a semi-arid tropical environment. J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res. 2017;17:6–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2016.10.009. [Google Scholar]
- [42].Silanikove N. The physiological basis of adaptation in goats to harsh environments. Small Rumin Res. 2000;35:181–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(99)00096-6. [Google Scholar]
- [43].Mwacharo J, Okeyo AM, Kamande GK, Rege JEO. The small east african shorthorn zebu cows in Kenya. I: linear body measurements. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2006;38:65–74. doi: 10.1007/s11250-006-4266-y. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-006-4266-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Asres A, Amha N. Physiological adaptation of animals to the change of environment: a review. J Biol Agric Health. 2014;4:2224–3208. [Google Scholar]
- [45].McManus C, Paludo GR, Louvandini H, Gugel R, Sasaki LC, Paiva SR. Heat tolerance in Brazilian sheep: physiological and blood parameters. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2009;41:95–101. doi: 10.1007/s11250-008-9162-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-008-9162-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Moradi MH, Nejati-Javaremi A, Moradi-Shahrbabak M, Dodds KG. Genomic scan of selective sweeps in thin and fat tail sheep breeds for identifying of candidate regions associated with fat deposition. BMC Genet. 2012;13:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-13-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-13-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Pragna P, Sejian V, Bagath M, Krishnan G, Archana PR, Soren NM, et al. Comparative assessment of growth performance of three different indigenous goat breeds exposed to summer heat stress. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2018;102(4):825–36. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12892. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Bhuiyan AKFH. Farm animal genetic resources in SAARC countries: diversity, conservation and management. Dhaka, Bangladesh: SAARC Agriculture Centre (SAC); 2014. Farm animal genetic resources in Bangladesh: diversity, conservation and management; pp. 1–74. [Google Scholar]
- [49].Islam MT, Ahmed S, Hamid MA. Effect of age on the carcass characteristics, wholesale cuts and meat quality of native Bengal lamb. Int J Nat Soc. 2018;5:44–50. [Google Scholar]
- [50].Birteeb PT, Peters SO, Yakubu A, Adeleke MA, Ozoje MO. Multivariate characterisation of the phenotypic traits of Djallonke and Sahel sheep in Northern Ghana. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2012;45(1):267–74. doi: 10.1007/s11250-012-0211-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0211-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Csizmar N, Gyori Z, Budai C, Olah J, Kovacs A, Javor A. Influence of birth type and sex on the growth performance of dorper lambs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2013;46(2):347–50. [Google Scholar]
- [52].Ahmed S, Rakib MRH, Karim RA, Fouzder SK, Jahan N, Sultana N, et al. Pre and post-natal nutrition of ewes on the performances of native Bengal ewes and their lambs. Vet Anim Sci. 2017;5(2):33–8. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20170502.12. [Google Scholar]
- [53].Kenyon PR, Webby RW. Pastures and supplements in sheep production systems. In: Rattray PV, Brookes IM, Nicol AM, editors. Pasture and supplements for grazing animals. New Zealand Society of Animal Production; 2007. pp. 255–74. [Google Scholar]
- [54].Sultana N, Hassan N, Ershaduzzaman M, Talukder MAI, Iqbal A. Effect of intensive and semi-intensive feeding system on productive and reproductive performances of native sheep. J Sci Res. 2011;3(3):693–8. https://doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v3i3.7129. [Google Scholar]
- [55].Ganesan R, Dhanavanthan P, Balasubramanyam D, Kumarasamy P. Estimates of genetic parameters of growth traits in Madras Red sheep. IOSR J Agric Vet Sci. 2013;3(5):69–73. [Google Scholar]
- [56].Azizunnesa ZBF, Bari FY, Alam MGS. Baseline study of reproductive performances of indigenous rams in Bangladesh. J Agric Vet Sci. 2014;7(6):83–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.9790/2380-07618389. [Google Scholar]
- [57].Murshed HM, Sarker MAH, Rahman SME, Hashem MA. Comparison of carcass and meat quality of Black Bengal goat and Indigenous sheep of Bangladesh. J Meat Sci Technol . 2014;27(2):62–73. [Google Scholar]
- [58].Sultana N, Hossain SMJ, Chowdhury SA, Hassan MR, Ershaduzzaman M. Effects of age on intake, growth, nutrient utilization and carcass characteristics of castrated native sheep. Bang Vet. 2010;27(2):62–73. https://doi.org/10.3329/bvet.v27i2.7556. [Google Scholar]
- [59].Ouédraogo-Koné S, Kaboré-Zoungrana CY, Ledin I. Behaviour of goats, sheep and cattle on natural pasture in the sub-humid zone of West Africa. Livest Sci. 2006;105(1-3):244–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.06.010. [Google Scholar]
- [60].Mysterud A. Diet overlap among ruminants in Fennoscandia. Oecologia. 2000;124(1):130–7. doi: 10.1007/s004420050032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Pérez-Barbería FJ, Gordon IJ, Nores C. Evolutionary transitions among feeding styles and habitats in ungulates. Evol Ecol Res. 2001;3(2):221–30. [Google Scholar]
- [62].Koluman N, Boga M, Silanikove N, Gorgulu M. Performance and eating behaviour of crossbred goats in Mediterranean climate of Turkey. Rev Bras de Zootec. 2016;45:768–72. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902016001200006. [Google Scholar]
- [63].Khaskheli AA, Khaskheli MI, Khaskheli AJ, Khaskheli AA. Significance of feeding practices for small ruminants: a reveiw. Agric Rev. 2020;41(3):285–90. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.R-149. [Google Scholar]
- [64].Moreno B, Mitzi G. Pastagens para ovinos e caprinos. Revista Oberro. 2008;111:48–55. [Google Scholar]
- [65].Palhano AL, Carvalho PDF, Barreto MZ. Influência da estrutura da pastagem na geometria do bocado e nos processos de procura e manipulação da forragem. Ciênc Cult. 2002;31:33–52. [Google Scholar]
- [66].Ngwa AT, Nsahlai IV, Bonsi MLK. Feed intake and dietary preferences of sheep and goats offered hay and legume-tree pods in South Africa. Agrofor Syst. 2003;57(1):29–37. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022988200484. [Google Scholar]
- [67].Masafu MM. 2006. The evaluation of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam) DE WIT: a renewable protein supplement for low-quality forages. Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Africa. [Google Scholar]
- [68].Rahman MZ, Ershaduzzaman M, Huque KS, Ali MY. Trend of livestock population and nutritional evaluation of available feed resources in coastal areas of Noakhali district. Bang J Anim Sci. 2014;43(3):213–7. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjas.v43i3.21652. [Google Scholar]
- [69].Sultana N, Alimon AR, Huque KS, Sazili AQ, Yaakub H, Hossain J. The effect of cutting interval on yield and nutrient composition of different plant fractions of Moringa oleifera tree. J Food Agric Environ. 2014;12(2):599–604. [Google Scholar]
- [70].Salma U, Yasmin L, Siddique MS, Miah AG. Effect of improved feeding on reproductive performance of sheep under traditional management system in char areas of Bangladesh. J Sci Technol. 2015;13:6–11. [Google Scholar]
- [71].Islam SS, Hasan MS, Ghosh N, Islam MS, Islam MM. Prospects and problems of indigenous sheep production in south-western coastal regions of Bangladesh. J Agric Sci Sri Lanka. 2021;16(1):54–66. https://doi.org/10.4038/jas.v16i1.9183. [Google Scholar]
- [72].Sarker AK, Amin MR, Hossain MA, Ali MS, Hashem MA. Present status of organic sheep production in Ramgoti upazila of Lakshmipur district. J Environ Sci Nat Resour. 2017;10(2):95–103. https://doi.org/10.3329/jesnr.v10i2.39018. [Google Scholar]
- [73].Sultana N, Rakib MRH, Hossain SMJ, Ahmed S, Ershaduzamman M, Talukder MAI. Effect of replacement of conventional concentrate in a rice straw diet by moringa foliage on lamb production performances. J Exp Agric Int. 2017;15(5):1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.9734/JEAI/2017/31329. [Google Scholar]
- [74].Ahmed S, Rakib MRH, Hemayet MA. Effect of total mixed ration based complete pellet feed on the performances of stall fed native sheep. SAARC J Agric. 2020;18(2):157–66. https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v18i2.51116. [Google Scholar]
- [75].Islam R, Redoy MRA, Shuvo AAS, Sarker MAH, Akbar MA, Al-Mamun M. Effect of pellet from total mixed ration on growth performance, blood metabolomics, carcass and meat characteristics of Bangladeshi garole sheep. Progress Agric. 2017;28(3):222–9. https://doi.org/10.3329/pa.v28i3.34659. [Google Scholar]
- [76].Morand-Fehr P, Doreau M. Ingestion et digestion chez les ruminants soumis à un stress de chaleur. INRA Prod Anim. 2001;1(14):15–27. https://doi.org/10.20870/productions-animales.2001.14.1.3722. [Google Scholar]
- [77].Behrendt R, Van Burgel AJ, Bailey A, Barber P, Curnow M, Gordon DJ, et al. On-farm paddock-scale comparisons across southern Australia confirm that increasing the nutrition of Merino ewes improves their production and the lifetime performance of their progeny. Anim Prod Sci. 2011;51(9):805–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN10183. [Google Scholar]
- [78].Greenwood PL, Thompson AN, Ford SP. Postnatal consequences of the maternal environment and of growth during prenatal life for productivity of ruminants. Managing the prenatal environment to enhance livestock productivity. 2009:3–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3135-8_1. [Google Scholar]
- [79].Blair HT, Jenkinson CMC, Peterson SW, Kenyon PRV, Van der Linden DS, Avenport LC, et al. Dam and grand dam feeding during pregnancy in sheep affects milk supply in offspring and reproductive performance in grand-offspring. J Anim Sci. 2010;88(13):2523–7. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Morgan JE, Fogarty NM, Nielsen S, Gilmour AR. The relationship of lamb growth from birth to weaning and the milk production of their primiparous crossbred dams. Aust J Exp Agric. 2007;47(8):899–904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EA06290. [Google Scholar]
- [81].Binns SH, Cox IJ, Rizvi S, Green LE. Risk factors for lamb mortality on UK sheep farms. Prev Vet Med. 2002;52(3-4):287–303. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(01)00255-0. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-5877(01)00255-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Ahmed S, Rakib MRH, Yesmin M, Ershaduzamman M. Effect of pre-and post-natal nutrition on the performances of ewes and lambs under semi-intensive rearing system. Bangladesh J Livest Res. 2019;26:43–50. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjlr.v26i1-2.49936. [Google Scholar]
- [83].Aziz KO, Al-Dabbagh ASS. Effect of plane of nutrition during late pregnancy and early lactation on milk production and lambs growth of Hamadani ewes. J Agric Sci. 2008;4:148–57. [Google Scholar]
- [84].Jaquiery AL, Oliver MH, Bloomfield FH, Harding JE. P2-134 regulation of postnatal growth is altered by maternal periconceptional undernutrition. Early Hum Dev. 2007;(83):S167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3782(07)70467-X. [Google Scholar]
- [85].Ford SP, Hess BW, Schwope MM, Nijland MJ, Gilbert JS, Vonnahme KA, et al. Maternal undernutrition during early to mid-gestation in the ewe results in altered growth, adiposity, and glucose tolerance in male offspring. J Anim Sci. 2007;85(5):1285–94. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-624. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Mahboub HD, Ramadan SG, Helal MA, Aziz EA. Effect of maternal feeding in late pregnancy on behaviour and performance of Egyptian goat and sheep and their offspring. Glob Vet. 2013;11(2):168–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.5829/idosi.gv.2013.11.2.74152. [Google Scholar]
- [87].Abd-Allah M. Effects of parity and nutrition plane during late pregnancy on metabolic responses, colostrum production and lamb output of Rahmani ewes. Egyptian J Anim Prod. 2013;50(3):132–42. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/ejap.2013.93673. [Google Scholar]
- [88].Lashein ME, Abd-Allah M, Hussein AMA, Tawfik MH. Effects of nutrition plane on productive performances of Ossimi ewes and their offspring during pregnancy and lactation periods. Arch Agri Sci J. 2019;2(3):1–14. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/aasj.2019.24370.1019. [Google Scholar]
- [89].Kenfo H. Review of indigenous sheep breeds production systems in Ethiopia. Int J Innov Sci Technol. 2021;6(2):667–675. [Google Scholar]
- [90].Islam S, Bhuiyan AFH, Ersaduzzaman MH, Lee SH, Bhuiyan MSA. Morphometric features, production and reproduction potentials of indigenous sheep genetic resources of Bangladesh. J Anim Breed Genet. 2018;2(2) https://doi.org/10.12972/jabng.20180026. [Google Scholar]
- [91].Iyiola-Tunji AO, Akpa GN, Nwagu BI, Adeyinka IA, Osuhor CA, Lawal TT, et al. Relationship between gestation length and birth weight in Nigerian sheep and their crosses. Anim Prod. 2010;12(3):135–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.anprod.2010.12.3.282. [Google Scholar]
- [92].Celik HT, Aslan FA, Arıcı YK, Kahveci ME, Kiper I. Determining the factors affecting the gestational length in sheep. Arch Anim Breed. 2021;64:83–9. doi: 10.5194/aab-64-83-2021. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-64-83-2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [93].Banchero GE, Stefanova K, Lindsay DR, Quintans G, Baldi F, Milton JTB, et al. Ovulation and ovulation rate in ewes under grazing conditions: factors affecting the response to short-term supplementation. Animal. 2021;15(2):100100. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2020.100100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [94].Steinheim G, Eikje LS, Klemetsdal G, Adnoy T. Effect of birth weight, gender and litter characteristics on summer mortality in lambs of Norwegian breeds. Acta Agric Scand Anim Sci. 2008;58(1):45–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064700802066471. [Google Scholar]
- [95].Morris CA, Hickey SM, Clarke JN. Genetic and environmental factors affecting lamb survival at birth and through to weaning. N Z J Agric Res. 2000;43(4):515–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2000.9513448. [Google Scholar]
- [96].Sultana N, Hasan MN, Iqbal A, Ershaduzzaman M, Talukder MAI, Dey S. Effect of intensive and semi-intensive feeding system on productive and reproductive performances of native sheep. J Sci Res. 2011;3(3):693–8. https://doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v3i3.7129. [Google Scholar]
- [97].Sultana N, Alimon AR, Huque KS, Sazili AQ, Yaakub H, Hossain J, et al. The feeding value of Moringa (Moringa oleifera) foliage as replacement to conventional concentrate diet in Bengal goats. Adv Anim Vet Sci. 2015;3(3):164–73. https://doi.org/10.14737/JOURNAL.AAVS%2F2015%2F3.3.164.173. [Google Scholar]
- [98].Marta M, Ingrid D, Angela Q, Luciana B, Yuri I. Volatiles and water- and fat-soluble precursors of Saanen goat and cross Suffolk lamb flavour. Molecules. 2013;18:2150–65. doi: 10.3390/molecules18022150. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18022150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [99].Billah MM, Islam SMA, Khan M. Investigation on the quantity and nutritional composition of slaughterhouse by products of indigenous sheep. J Food Agric Environ. 2021;2(1):97–101. http://doi.org/10.47440/JAFE.2021.2117. [Google Scholar]
- [100].Ahmed BS, Osmani MG, Rahman AKMA, Hasan MM, Maruf AA, Karim MF, et al. Economic impact of caprine and ovine brucellosis in Mymensingh district, Bangladesh. J Vet Med. 2018;16(2):193–203. https://doi.org/10.33109/bjvmjd1805. [Google Scholar]
- [101].Islam SMA, Farzana F, Murshed HM, Rahman SME. Study on meat quality of native sheep raised in organic and conventional production system. J Meat Sci Technol. 2019;7(01):01–7. [Google Scholar]
- [102].Hossain MT, Ershaduzzaman M, Jubayer MMU, Molla JB, Majumder MKH. Development of jute, cotton and sheep wool blended yarn using cotton spinning system. Bangladesh J Livest Res. 2018;21-25:173–7. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjlr.v0i0.45461. [Google Scholar]
- [103].Samad MA. Five-decade systematic review of research progress on production and management of small ruminants in Bangladesh. J Vet Med OH Res. 2021;3(1):01–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.36111/jvmohr.2021.3(1).0026. [Google Scholar]
- [104].Khan MJ, Qadir S. Nutritive value and digestion kinetics of manure ensiled wheat straws treated with varing levels of Urea and Corn grains. J Appl Sci Envi Manage. 2008;12(2):103–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v12i2.55546. [Google Scholar]
- [105].Khan MJ, Basit A, Arshad HM, Farooq AA, Hayat CS. Epidimiological studies on different factors affecting growth performance of animals in Southern Punjab. National conference on the strategies to improve red meat production in Pakistan; Panjab, Pakistan. 2010. p. 36. [Google Scholar]
- [106].Islam MA, Islam MS, Wahab MA. Impacts of climate change on shrimp farming in the south-west coastal region of Bangladesh. Res Agric Livest Fish. 2016;3(1):227–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/ralf.v3i1.27881. [Google Scholar]
- [107].Hassan MR, Talukder MAI. Comparative performance of different regional native sheep in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Vet. 2012;28(2):85–95. https://doi.org/10.3329/bvet.v28i2.10692. [Google Scholar]
- [108].Pezzanite L, Neary M, Hutchens T, Scharko P. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky; 2009. Common diseases and health problems in sheep and goats. [Google Scholar]
- [109].Sarkar MM, Hossain MM, Rahman MM, Rahman SME. Effect of feeding of urea molasses block on productive and reproductive performances of Black Bengal doe. J Bangladesh Agric Univ. 2008;6(1):39–46. [Google Scholar]
- [110].Munsi MN, Ershaduzzaman M, Rahman MM, Rahman MM. Incidence of clinical diseases and disorders in native sheep at the sheep research farm of Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh from 2012 to 2014. Asian Australas J Biosci Biotechnol. 2016;1(1):37–46. [Google Scholar]
- [111].Radostits OM, Gay C, Hinchcliff KW, Constable PD. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006. Veterinary Medicine E-Book: a textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats. [Google Scholar]
- [112].Anholt RM, Klima C, Allan N, Matheson-Bird H, Schatz C, Ajitkumar P, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria that cause bovine respiratory disease complex in Alberta, Canada. Front Vet Sci. 2017;4:207. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00207. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [113].Samad MA. Vol. 2 Bangladesh: Mymensigh; 2008. Animal husbandry and veterinary science, LEP Publication No. 11A, ISSN 984-8094-01-8. [Google Scholar]
- [114].Balamurugan V, Saravanan P, Sen A, Rajak KK, Venkatesan G, Krishnamoorthy P, et al. Prevalence of peste des petits ruminants among sheep and goats in India. J Vet Sci. 2012;13(3):279–85. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2012.13.3.279. https://doi.org/10.4142%2Fjvs.2012.13.3.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [115].Nandi S, De UK, Chowdhury S. Current status of contagious ecthyma or orf disease in goat and sheep - a global perspective. Small Rumin Res. 2011;96(2-3):73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.11.018. [Google Scholar]
- [116].Li H, Zhu X, Zheng Y, Wang S, Liu Z, Dou Y, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of two Chinese orf virus isolates based on sequences of B2L and VIR genes. Arch Virol. 2013;158(7):1477–85. doi: 10.1007/s00705-013-1641-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-013-1641-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [117].Zhao K, Song D, He W, Lu H, Zhang B, Li C, et al. Identification and phylogenetic analysis of an Orf virus isolated from an outbreak in sheep in the Jilin province of China. Vet Microbiol. 2010;142(3-4):408–15. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.10.006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [118].Buller RM, Arif BM, Black DN, Dumbell KR, Esposito JJ, Lefkowitz EJ, et al. Academic Press; Virus taxonomy: eight report of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses. ISBN 978-0-12-249951-7. [Google Scholar]
- [119].Daoud JA. Sheep pox among Australian sheep in Jordan. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1997;29(4):251–2. doi: 10.1007/BF02632317. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02632317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [120].Poddar PR, Begum N, Alim MA, Dey AR, Hossain MS, Labony SS. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminths of sheep in Sherpur, Bangladesh. J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2017;4(3):274–80. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2017.d224. [Google Scholar]
- [121].Nimbkar C, Ghalsasi PM, Walkden-Brown SW, Kahn LP. 7th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Montpellier, France: 2002. Breeding program for the genetic improvement of Deccani sheep of Maharashtra, India; pp. 19–23. [Google Scholar]
- [122].Pan S, Sahoo AK, Tantia MS, Ahlawat SP. Haryana, India: West Bengal University of Agriculture and Fisheries Science (WBUAFS); 2004. Garole sheep NATP (MM) on animal genetic resource biodiversity. [Google Scholar]
- [123].Nooruddin M, Miah MI, Miah MA, Pandit KK, Kamaruddin KM. Prevalence and concurrence of skin diseases of sheep in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Vet. 1988;5:48–53. [Google Scholar]
- [124].Brozos C, Mavrogianni VS, Fthenakis GC. Treatment and control of periparturient metabolic diseases: pregnancy toxaemia, hypocalcaemia, hypomagnesaemia. Vet Clin Food Anim. 2011;27:105–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2010.10.004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2010.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [125].Andrews A. Pregnancy toxaemia in the ewe. In Pract. 1997;19:306–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/inpract.19.6.306. [Google Scholar]
- [126].Hossain , MA , Sun MA, Islam T, Rahman MM, Rahman MW, Hashem MA. Socio-economic characteristics and present scenario of sheep farmers at sherpur district in Bangladesh. SAARC J Agric. 2021;19(1):185–99. https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v19i1.54789. [Google Scholar]
- [127].Hossain MA, Akhtar A, Easin M, Maleque MA, Rahman MF, Islam MS. Women livelihood improvement through sheep (Ovis aries) rearing in Sirajganj district of Bangladesh. Int J Nat Soc Sci. 2018;5:1–8. [Google Scholar]
- [128].Tempelman KA, Cardelino RA. Preserving and developing unique animal genetic resources for future generations. 2007:111–9. [Google Scholar]
- [129].Hossen MJ, Hossain MS, Abedin MJ, Karim MR, Rume FI. Animal production strategies in southern region of Bangladesh. Agriculturists. 2008;6(1&2):77–83. https://doi.org/10.3329/agric.v6i1.5217. [Google Scholar]
- [130].Sarker AK, Amin MR, Hossain MA, Ali MS, Hashem MA. Present status of organic sheep production in Ramgoti upazila of Lakshmipur district. J Environ Sci Nat Resour. 2017;10(2):95–103. https://doi.org/10.3329/jesnr.v10i2.39018. [Google Scholar]
- [131].Asaduzzaman M, Jha PK, Alam GS, Bari FY. On-farm management, breeding practice and constraints between two sheep breeds in Bangladesh. J Anim Prod. 2021;62(1):15–23. https://doi.org/10.29185/hayuretim.767083. [Google Scholar]
- [132].Amin MR, Ershaduzzaman M, Hossain SJ, Kabir MA, Deb GK. Socioeconomic investigation and husbandry management practices of native sheep rearing farmers in selected areas of Bangladesh. Economics. 2020;5(6):286–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20200506.17. [Google Scholar]
- [133].Haque MI, Sarder MJU, Islam MA, Khaton R. Islam MH. Morphometric characterization of Barind sheep of Bangladesh. J Earth Environ Sci. 2020;4(192):2577–0640. https://doi.org/10.29011/2577-0640.100192. [Google Scholar]
- [134].Bhuiyan MSA, Bhuiyan AKFH, Lee JH, Lee SH. Community based livestock breeding in Bangladesh: present status and challenges. J Anim Breed Genet. 2017;1:77–84. https://doi.org/10.12972/jabng.20170009. [Google Scholar]
- [135].Seleka TB. Determinants of short-run supply of small ruminants in Botswana. Small Rumin Res. 2001;40:203–14. doi: 10.1016/s0921-4488(01)00182-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-4488(01)00182-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [136].Kamal MM, Mondal SK, Islam SS, Islam MS. Present status of goat rearing in three selected upazilas of Khulna district. J Rural Dev. 2012;37(2):43–62. [Google Scholar]

