Abstract
The effector activity of IgG antibodies is regulated at several levels, including IgG subclass, modifications of the Fc glycan, and the distribution of Type I and II Fcγ receptors (FcγR) on effector cells. Here, we explore how Fc glycosylation, particularly sialylation and fucosylation, tunes cellular responses to immune complexes. We review the current understanding of the pathways and mechanisms underlying this biology, address FcγR in antigen presentation, and discuss aspects of the clinical understanding of Fc glycans in therapies and disease.
Introduction
Immune cells use a number of receptors to identify pathogens based on their expression of conserved antigens or pathogen-associated molecular patterns. Importantly, they also leverage aspects of the adaptive immune response, IgG antibodies in particular, to assist in pathogen recognition and internalization, and to enhance or suppress cellular activation and subsequent immune effector functions. The multivalent interaction between cells expressing Fc-gamma receptors (FcγRs) and IgG-opsonized pathogens (immune complexes; IC) enables crosstalk between the innate and adaptive immune systems to refine the overall response. Significant structural and functional heterogeneity exists within both IgG antibodies and FcγRs, which modulates the response of effector cells towards a pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory phenotype. In this review, we present the current understanding of how immune effector cells interact with IgG antibodies using Type I and Type II FcγRs, with a focus on fucosylation and sialylation of the Fc glycan to modulate pro- and anti-inflammatory effects.
IgG antibody glycosylation
IgG antibodies are among the most abundant immunomodulatory proteins in human serum and are mostly generated in response to infection, vaccination, or autoimmunity. The IgG isotype is comprised of four distinct subclasses of varying serum abundance, with IgG1 > IgG2 > IgG3 > IgG4 [1,2]. Differences in the amino acids within the constant region (Fc) of each IgG subclass influence binding to FcγRs, and the relative affinity of each subclass to activating versus inhibitory FcγRs, or A/I ratio, leads to differences in biological function of IgGs [2]. For example, IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses preferentially bind activating FcγRs and trigger complement activation compared to IgG2 and IgG4. The activating or inhibitory potential of each IgG subclass is further refined by a posttranslational modification of the Fc at asparagine-297 (N297) [3]. The combined presence or absence of galactose, sialic acid, bisecting N-acetylglucosamine, and core fucose within the Fc N-glycan can further modulate the interactions with FcγRs, thereby fine-tuning the activating and inhibitory signaling (Figure 1) [4–6]. Although the Fc glycan is highly conserved across IgG subclasses, the effect of IgG1 glycosylation on FcγR affinity is most well studied. Of the Fc glycan modifications, the presence or absence of the core fucose and the terminal sialic acids have the greatest impact on IgG1 Fc-mediated activity through modification of Type I and Type II FcγR affinity, respectively [7].
Figure 1.

Cartoon representation of the complex, biantennary, N-linked Fc glycan.
The regulation of Fc glycosylation is an important topic of ongoing investigation. Regulatory mechanisms of both intra-and inter-IgG Fc glycan patterns/repertoires exist, with intra-repertoire mechanisms driving common shifts in Fc glycoforms that are observed during vaccination or infection and inter-repertoire mechanisms resulting in broad distinctions in Fc domain glycosylation among individuals. One mechanism for intra-repertoire regulation occurs via activation of distinct B cell populations. For example, antibody responses likely generated by memory cell-derived plasmablasts are reduced in Fc sialylation and fucosylation relative to responses observed during a primary response [9–10]. The type of antigen encountered also impacts Fc glycoforms on newly produced IgGs. For example, T cell-independent antigens elicit IgGs enriched for Fc sialylation [11]. A recent study suggests that enveloped viruses, non-enveloped viruses, and soluble antigens each elicit IgGs with distinct Fc glycoforms, indicating that differences in antigen recognition and BCR signaling can impact regulatory pathways [12]. A variety of extrinsic factors that can be present during B cell activation and differentiation, such as CpG oligodeoxynucleotide or IL-21, may also drive selective Fc glycoform production [13].
Inter-repertoire regulation is likely driven by a combination of heritable and non-heritable factors. One of the better characterized pathways involved in both intra- and inter-repertoire regulation of Fc glycosylation is regulation by sex hormones to modulate the pro- or anti-inflammatory activity of IgG. Fc glycosylation changes with physiologic shifts in estrogen levels, such as in puberty [14] and menopause [15,16]. Sialylation, an active anti-inflammatory modification of the Fc, decreases during therapeutic estrogen suppression [17] and increases during pregnancy, directly supporting a role for estrogen in positive regulation of Fc sialylation [18,19]. The regulation of sialyation by estrogen has clinical implications for many autoimmune diseases, particularly those that occur predominantly in women. This is illustrated by studies of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), whose baseline sialylation and galactosylation are decreased relative to healthy controls [20]. RA symptoms frequently go into remission during the high estrogen state of pregnancy [21] when sialylation and galactosylation are elevated [22,23]. A potential mechanism underlying this regulation was demonstrated by increased expression of St6Gal1, the relevant sialylatransferase, in RA patients who received exogenous estrogen treatment [24]. In a mouse model of RA, St6Gal1 was down-regulated by the well-characterized IL-23-activation of Th17 cells that occurs in arthritis [25]. Age and sex are generally associated with distinct patterns of Fc glycosylation with male sex or increasing age often correlating with decreased Fc sialylation and fucosylation [26]. More work is needed to define additional mechanisms for regulation of Fc glycosylation, but the potential to manipulate this determinant of IgG activity for clinical benefit is promising.
Type I receptors and IgG1 fucosylation
The Type I FcγRs are a small family of receptors that are critical in inflammatory homeostasis and appropriate maturation of antigen-presenting cells (Figure 2 and Table 1) [2,27–29]. Nearly all the Type I FcγRs exhibit low affinity for IgG and require multivalent interactions with IC to stabilize binding through avidity-based interactions [30]. FcγRI (CD64) is the sole exception, capable of monomeric binding to IgG1, IgG3, and IgG4. The majority of Type I FcγRs are activating through an activation signaling motif (ITAM) [31]. FcγRIIb (CD32b) and FcγRIIIb (CD16b) are exceptions: FcγRIIb has an inhibitory signaling motif (ITIM) and FcγRIIIb has no signaling motif. Crosslinking of activating FcγRs promotes ITAM phosphorylation and activation through the recruitment of Src family kinases and subsequent Syk activation, which initiates a variety of signaling cascades that contribute to cytoskeletal remodeling, calcium flux, and pro-inflammatory gene up-regulation. FcγRIIb crosslinking induces ITIM signaling that directly counteracts ITAM signaling through the recruitment of tyrosine and inositol phosphatases that dephosphorylate activated ITAMs and associated adapter molecules, overriding an activating response [32].
Figure 2.

Type I and Type II FcγRs. The Type I FcγRs are members of the immunoglobulin super family. The Type II FcγRs are members of the C-type lectin family.
Table 1.
Type I and II FcγR. Table includes various designations for each FcγR, relative affinity of each FcγR for IgG1 (fucosylated and not sialylated), and expression by distinct immune cell subsets.
| Type I FcγRs - immunoglobulin superfamily | Type II FcγRs - C-type lectins | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FcγR designations | FcγRI | FcγRIIa | FcγRIIb | FcγRIIIa | FcγRIIIb | DC-SIGN | FcεRII |
| CD designation | CD64 | CD32a | CD32b | CD16a | CD16b | CD209 | CD23a/b |
| Affinity for IgG1 | high | low | low | low | low | low | low |
| Expression of Type 1 and Type II FcγRs on immune cells | |||||||
| Dendritic cell | −/* | + | + | −/* | − | + | * |
| Macrophage | + | + | + | + | − | + | * |
| Non-classical monocyte | + | + | +/− | + | − | −/* | * |
| Classical monocyte | + | + | +/− | − | − | −/* | * |
| B cell | − | − | + | − | − | − | + |
| T cell | − | − | − | −/* | − | − | +/− |
| NK cell | − | − | − | + | − | − | − |
| Neutrophil | * | + | +/− | − | + | − | − |
represents positive expression,
represents negative or unappreciable expression,
represents mixed expression,
represents inducible expression,
represents negative expression with some evidence of inducible expression.
Type I FcγRs are expressed in various combinations on immune cells [33] (Table 1). In instances of FcγR coexpression, the net signal received is a function of the combination of FcγR expression along with IgG subclasses and Fc glycans within an IC. In particular, the presence or absence of a core fucose within the IgG1 Fc N-linked glycan has a pronounced impact on FcγR affinity for IgG1, particularly that of the activating FcγRIIIa and the non-signaling FcγRIIIb; afucosylation (absence of the fucose) enhances affinity for these receptors by ~10-fold. Overall, afucosylation of the IgG1 Fc is a strongly pro-inflammatory modification. Afucosylated IC-FcγRIIIa interactions, in particular, are well characterized and mediate a variety of activating cellular activities, including enhanced cytotoxicity in tumor models, maturation of myeloid cells and NK cell activation [34,35].
The increased inflammatory potential of afucosylated IgG1 is typically offset by a low serum frequency of approximately 8 ± 5% [36]. Increased abundance of afucosylated IgG1 has been observed in a number of disease settings including fetal/neonatal alloimmunity, severe secondary dengue infection, and COVID-19 [12,37–43]. In the context of secondary dengue infections, where reactive but non-neutralizing IgG antibodies are present, afucosylated anti-dengue IgGs are enriched in people who progress to more severe disease [39,41,44]. Mechanistically, afucosylated dengue IC have increased infection potential in cells that express both FcγRIIa and FcgRIIIa in a pathway that requires both receptors: FcγRIIa was shown to mediate a majority of virus IC entry, while FcγRIIIa signaling enhanced a post-entry step in infection [44]. In studies related to COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 reactive, afucosylated IgGs were also found to be enriched in people who would later progress to more severe disease [12,42]. In the lungs of humanized mice, afucosylated SARS-CoV-2 spike IC triggered cellular infiltration and inflammatory cytokine production similar to what is observed in severe COVID-19, including monocyte and neutrophil infiltration with elevated TNFα and IL-6 in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid [42,43]. Fc fucosylation has been manipulated for clinical benefit with the introduction of obinutuzumab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that is enriched for an afucosylated (and bisected) Fc glycans. Obinutuzumab showed superior progression-free survival in leukemia and lymphoma [45–47]. Whether levels of Fc fucosylation can be regulated to prevent severe inflammatory sequelae in some diseases or to enhance maturation of innate cells for adjuvant-like purposes during vaccination remain important areas for future investigation.
Type II receptors and IgG1 sialylation
Two functionally distinct Type II FcγRs have been described: FcεRII (CD23) and dendritic cell-specific intracellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN, CD209) (Figure 2). These are multifunctional C-type lectins that were initially characterized based on their binding of IgE and ICAM3 [48–50]. Type II FcγR affinity for IgG1 is dependent on Fc sialylation [51] and Type II FcγRs are required for sialylated IgG1-mediated cellular effects in vivo [7,52,53]. The combination of Fc sialylation and core fucosylation promotes a more flexible, ‘closed’ conformation of the CH2 region of the Fc [54]. This conformation is thought to reduce the binding of IgG Fc by many Type I FcγRs, but enable binding by the Type II receptors [55,56].
DC-SIGN and its murine homolog SIGN-R1 are expressed on dendritic cells and macrophages and play a role in innate and adaptive immunity as pattern recognition receptors of carbohydrates with endocytic capability [3,49]. The signaling pathway downstream of sialylated IC-DC-SIGN interactions is an area of ongoing investigation, but observations in mice suggest that engagement of the murine orthologue, SIGN-R1, by sialylated IC ultimately promotes a Th2 response through the production of IL-33, which stimulates the release of the cytokine IL-4 by basophils [57,58]. Elevated IL-4, in turn, triggers increased expression of the inhibitory FcγR CD32b on myeloid cells, reducing inflammatory activity, including suppressing serum-induced arthritis in an animal model [58,59].
Clinically, this pathway is harnessed in the use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), which is made from purified IgG pooled from thousands of donors and is used broadly as a treatment for inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Multiple Fab- and Fc-mediated mechanisms have been proposed for the anti-inflammatory properties of IVIg, and we focus here on the role of Fc sialylation. The fraction of sialylated IgG in individuals varies with age and sex but is generally less than 20% [60], and in commercial preparations, the percentage of sialylated IVIg is relatively constant at ~16% [61]. However, individuals can differ by up to 30% in their abundance of sialylated antibodies [62], and abundance within an individual can vary over time and in response to antigens. IVIg is given at supraphysiologic doses (1–2 g/kg) such that the total circulating sialylated IgG in an individual is increased, regardless of pre-treatment abundance. A number of in vivo studies in which the Fc sialylated component of IVIg was either removed or enriched have demonstrated a direct correlation between the abundance of sialylated Fc and the therapeutic efficacy of IVIg [63–65].
The second Type II FcγR, CD23, has two variants, CD23a and CD23b, that differ in their cell-type expression: low levels of CD23a are constitutively expressed by B cells, whereas expression of CD23b is induced by IL-4 on myeloid cells, B cells, and several subsets of T cells [66,67]. In B cells, CD23 ligation by sialylated IC also promotes increased expression of FcγRIIb, effectively raising the threshold for ITAM-mediated cell activation [52]. The outcome of this in B cells is an increased threshold for cell activation, based on the affinity of the B cell receptor for the antigen within an IC. Thus, sialylated IC vaccines have been shown to elicit higher affinity antibody responses [10,68]. It is not yet clear what IgG-CD23-dependent mechanisms exist in myeloid cells.
FcγRs and antigen presentation
Type I FcγRs play a crucial role in presentation of soluble protein antigen by uptake of IgG-antigen IC [69]. FcγR-bound IC are sorted in a FcγR-ITAM dependent manner to lysosomal compartments for proteolytic processing of antigen and FcγR, with subsequent presentation of antigen-derived peptides and degradation of FcγR [70]. Evidence for Ig/HLA-DM interaction in MHCII/peptide loading compartments of B cells raises the possibility that a similar interaction mediates lysosomal association of FcγR-IC with a class II peptideloading complex in DCs or monocyte/macrophages [71]. In addition, in certain APCs, such as murine CD8+ DC, or human CD141+ DCs, FcγRs function in association with the neonatal Fc Receptor to regulate endosomal transport of IC, allowing cross-presentation of antigen via MHCI [72]. Antigen internalized via cross-linked FcγRs is enhanced for cross-presentation by MHC class I compared to fluid phase uptake without opsonization [73].
A focused investigation into the effect of IgG1 fucosylation on antigen presentation has yet to be performed. In vitro stimulation of human monocytes and macrophages with afucosylated IC has been shown to promote greater IC internalization and pro-inflammatory cytokine production [37,42,74,75]. It is noteworthy that human DCs, the paramount APC, do not typically express FcγRIIIa, and thus would largely be agnostic to differences in IgG fucosylation. While FcγRIIIa-ITAM signaling is clearly not necessary for professional antigen presentation in humans, the murine ortholog, FcγRIV, is expressed on mouse DCs, raising the question of separate evolutionary pressures leading to distinct patterns of expression.
For Type II FcγR, high affinity targeting of the carbohydrate-recognition domain of DC-SIGN has served as an efficient mechanism for the direct delivery of antigens (and adjuvants) to DCs. This approach promotes DC activation and enhances antigen presentation, including cross-presentation in vitro [76–80].
Direct targeting of vaccine antigens to FcγR pathways to improve antigen processing and presentation may be a useful strategy to improve vaccine responses. This could be particularly pertinent for poorly immunogenic antigens or for populations that mount sub-optimal vaccine responses [81].
Conclusions
Antibody interactions with effector cells are influenced by multiple factors, including IgG subclass, modifications to the Fc glycan, and the expression of various FcγRs. The diversity of FcγRs expressed and the highly variable activities that they transduce, represent multiple levers to modulate activating and inhibitory signaling on immune effector cells. Specific modifications to the IgG1 Fc glycan, such as the absence of fucose or the presence of sialic acid, further polarize the inflammatory effects of IgG. Studies of IVIg and sialylated IgG1, specifically, in inflammatory diseases have led to new understandings of Fc sialylation in anti-inflammatory processes, although much remains to be learned. The role of Fc fucosylation in modulating inflammatory responses to IC and the diversity of mechanisms by which afucosylated IC may contribute to modulation of various diseases is another area of active discovery. Our hope is that continued investigations into the regulation of antibody-mediated effector functions through IgG Fc glycosylation will yield breakthroughs in the purposeful manipulation of relevant pathways for clinical benefit.
Acknowledgements
Support was received from Stanford University and the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers U19 AI111825, R01 AI139119 and the Collaborative Influenza Vaccine Innovation Centers (CIVIC) of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases under grant number 75N93019C00051.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
- 1.Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV: Four keys to unlock IgG. J Exp Med 2021, 218:e20201753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.••.Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV: Divergent immunoglobulin g subclass activity through selective Fc receptor binding. Science 2005, 310:1510–1512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Demonstrated differential affinities of IgG subclasses for activating vs inhibitor Fc receptors, the activating/inhibitory ratio.
- 3.Anthony RM, Nimmerjahn F: The role of differential IgG glycosylation in the interaction of antibodies with FcγRs in vivo. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2011, 16:7–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ferrara C, et al. : Unique carbohydrate-carbohydrate interactions are required for high affinity binding between FcgammaRIII and antibodies lacking core fucose. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:12669–12674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Falconer DJ, et al. : Antibody fucosylation lowers FcγRIIIa/CD16a affinity by limiting the conformations sampled by the N162-glycan. ACS Chem Biol 2018, 13:2179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang TT: IgG Fc glycosylation in human immunity. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2019, 423:63–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pincetic A, et al. : Type I and type II Fc receptors regulate innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Immunol 2014, 15:707–716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang TT, et al. : IgG antibodies to dengue enhanced for FcgammaRIIIA binding determine disease severity. Science 2017, 355:395–398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang TT, et al. : Anti-HA glycoforms drive B cell affinity selection and determine influenza vaccine efficacy. Cell 2015, 162:160–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hess C, et al. : T cell-independent B cell activation induces immunosuppressive sialylated IgG antibodies. J Clin Investig 2013, 123:3788–3796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.•.Larsen MD, et al. : Afucosylated IgG characterizes enveloped viral responses and correlates with COVID-19 severity. Science 2021,371:eabc8378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; First to show that severe COVID-19 disease is associated with afucosylated antibodies.
- 13.Wang J, et al. : Fc-glycosylation of IgG1 is modulated by B-cell stimuli. Mol Cell Proteom 2011, 10:M110004655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cheng HD, et al. : IgG Fc glycosylation as an axis of humoral immunity in childhood. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020, 145:710–713.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Deriš H, et al. : Immunoglobulin G glycome composition in transition from premenopause to postmenopause. iScience 2022. 25:103897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ercan A, et al. : Estrogens regulate glycosylation of IgG in women and men. JCI Insight 2017, 2:e89703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mijakovac A, et al. : Effects of estradiol on immunoglobulin G glycosylation: mapping of the downstream signaling mechanism. Front Immunol 2021, 12:680227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bondt A, et al. : Immunoglobulin G (IgG) fab glycosylation analysis using a new mass spectrometric high-throughput profiling method reveals pregnancy-associated changes. Mol Cell Proteom 2014, 13:3029–3039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Reiding KR, et al. : Serum protein N-glycosylation changes with rheumatoid arthritis disease activity during and after pregnancy. Front Med 2018, 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Parekh RB, et al. : Association of rheumatoid arthritis and primary osteoarthritis with changes in the glycosylation pattern of total serum IgG. Nature 1985, 316:452–457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Østensen M, Villiger PM: The remission of rheumatoid arthritis during pregnancy. Semin Immunopathol 2007, 29:185–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rook GAW, et al. : Changes in IgG glycoform levels are associated with remission of arthritis during pregnancy. J Autoimmun 1991,4:779–794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.van de Geijn FE, et al. : Immunoglobulin G galactosylation and sialylation are associated with pregnancy-induced improvement of rheumatoid arthritis and the postpartum flare: results from a large prospective cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther 2009, 11:R193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Engdahl C, et al. : Estrogen induces St6gal1 expression and increases IgG sialylation in mice and patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a potential explanation for the increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis in postmenopausal women. Arthritis Res Ther 2018, 20:84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.•.Pfeifle R, et al. : Regulation of autoantibody activity by the IL-23-TH17 axis determines the onset of autoimmune disease. Nat Immunol 2017, 18:104–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Showed an IL-23-Th17 pathway in mice that regulated sialytransferase with subsequent change in IgG glycosylation which trigged autoimmune arthritis in mice; and demonstrated that the same IgG changes occurred in the shift from asymptomatic to symptomatic RA in humans.
- 26.Gudelj I, Lauc G, Pezer M: Immunoglobulin G glycosylation in aging and diseases. Cell Immunol 2018, 333:65–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kalergis AM, Ravetch JV: Inducing tumor immunity through the selective engagement of activating Fcgamma receptors on dendritic cells. J Exp Med 2002, 195:1653–1659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dhodapkar KM, et al. : Selective blockade of inhibitory Fcgamma receptor enables human dendritic cell maturation with IL-12p70 production and immunity to antibody-coated tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:2910–2915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nimmerjahn F, et al. : FcgammaRIV: a novel FcR with distinct IgG subclass specificity. Immunity 2005, 23:41–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Daëron M: Fc receptor biology. Annu Rev Immunol 1997, 15:203–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ra C, et al. : A macrophage Fc gamma receptor and the mast cell receptor for IgE share an identical subunit. Nature 1989, 341:752–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bruhns P, et al. : Molecular basis of the recruitment of the SH2 domain-containing inositol 5-phosphatases SHIP1 and SHIP2 by fcgamma RIIB. J Biol Chem 2000, 275:37357–37364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kerntke C, Nimmerjahn F, Biburger M: There is (Scientific) strength in numbers: a comprehensive quantitation of Fc gamma receptor numbers on human and murine peripheral blood leukocytes. Front Immunol 2020, 11:118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ysebaert L, et al. : Obinutuzumab (GA101) is highly effective against chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells in ex vivo B-cell depletion irrespective of high-risk prognostic markers. Blood Cancer J 2015, 5:e367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bournazos S, Wang TT, Ravetch JV: The role and function of Fcgamma receptors on myeloid cells. Microbiol Spectr 2016, 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Baković MP, et al. : High-throughput IgG Fc N-glycosylation profiling by mass spectrometry of glycopeptides. J Proteome Res 2013, 12:821–831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kapur R, et al. : A prominent lack of IgG1-Fc fucosylation of platelet alloantibodies in pregnancy. Blood 2014, 123:471–480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kapur R, et al. : Low anti-RhD IgG-Fc-fucosylation in pregnancy: a new variable predicting severity in haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Br J Haematol 2014, 166:936–945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang TT, et al. : IgG antibodies to dengue enhanced for FcγRIIIA binding determine disease severity. Science 2017, 355:395–398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Thulin NK, et al. : Maternal anti-dengue IgG fucosylation predicts susceptibility to dengue disease in infants. Cell Rep 2020, 31:107642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bournazos S, et al. : Antibody fucosylation predicts disease severity in secondary dengue infection. Science 2021, 372:1102–1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chakraborty S, et al. : Proinflammatory IgG Fc structures in patients with severe COVID-19. Nat Immunol 2021, 22:67–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.••.Chakraborty S, et al. : Early non-neutralizing, afucosylated antibody responses are associated with COVID-19 severity. Sci Transl Med 2022, 14:eabm7853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; First demonstration that afucosylated, but not fucosylated, immune complexes elicit a robust early inflammatory response in the lungs of FcγR-humanized mice.
- 44.Thulin NK, et al. : Maternal anti-dengue IgG fucosylation predicts susceptibility to dengue disease in infants. Cell Rep 2020, 31:107642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Goede V, et al. : Obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. N Engl J Med 2014, 370:1101–1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Marcus R, et al. : Obinutuzumab for the first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2017, 377:1331–1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.••.Radford J, et al. : Obinutuzumab (GA101) plus CHOP or FC in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: results of the GAUDI study (BO21000). Blood 2013, 122:1137–1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; First time that a glycoengineered monoclonal antibody was approved for clinical use, showed improved clinical outcomes in follicular lymphoma.
- 48.Anthony RM, et al. : Identification of a receptor required for the anti-inflammatory activity of IVIG. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:19571–19578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Holla A, Skerra A: Comparative analysis reveals selective recognition of glycans by the dendritic cell receptors DC-SIGN and Langerin. Protein Eng Des Sel 2011,24:659–669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.General mechanism for modulating immunoglobulin effector function | PNAS. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 51.Pagan JD, Kitaoka M, Anthony RM: Engineered sialylation of pathogenic antibodies in vivo attenuates autoimmune disease. Cell 2018, 172:564–577.e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.••.Wang TT, et al. : Anti-HA glycoforms drive B cell affinity selection and determine influenza vaccine efficacy. Cell 2015, 162:160–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Demonstrated that reactive non-neutralizing IgG in severe dengue is enriched for afucosylated IgG1.
- 53.Anthony RM, Ravetch JV: A novel role for the IgG Fc glycan: the anti-inflammatory activity of sialylated IgG Fcs. J Clin Immunol 2010, 30 Suppl 1:S9–S14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.•.Ahmed AA, et al. : Structural characterization of anti-inflammatory immunoglobulin G Fc proteins. J Mol Biol 2014, 426:3166–3179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; First to report crystal structure of fully desialylated IgG Fc with open and closed conformations of CH2 domain.
- 55.Krapp S, et al. : Structural analysis of human IgG-Fc glycoforms reveals a correlation between glycosylation and structural integrity. J Mol Biol 2003, 325:979–989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sondermann P, et al. : General mechanism for modulating immunoglobulin effector function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013, 110:9868–9872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yokota A, et al. : Two species of human Fc epsilon receptor II (Fc epsilon RII/CD23): tissue-specific and IL-4-specific regulation of gene expression. Cell 1988, 55:611–618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Anthony RM, et al. : Intravenous gammaglobulin suppresses inflammation through a novel TH2 pathway. Nature 2011, 475:110–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wijngaarden S, et al. : A shift in the balance of inhibitory and activating Fcgamma receptors on monocytes toward the inhibitory Fcgamma receptor IIb is associated with prevention of monocyte activation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50:3878–3887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Clynes R: Protective mechanisms of IVIG. Curr Opin Immunol 2007, 19:646–651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Fokkink WJR, et al. : Comparison of Fc N-glycosylation of pharmaceutical products of intravenous immunoglobulin G. PLoS One 2015, 10:e0139828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dalziel M, et al. : Emerging principles for the therapeutic exploitation of glycosylation. Science 2014, 343:1235681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.•.Kaneko Y, Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV: Anti-inflammatory activity of immunoglobulin G resulting from Fc sialylation. Science 2006, 313:670–673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Showed that anti-inflammatory properties of IVIG are dependent on sialylated Fc and a recombinant sialylated Fc fragment induced a strong anti-inflammatory effect in a mouse model of arthritis.
- 64.Anthony RM, et al. : Recapitulation of IVIG anti-inflammatory activity with a recombinant IgG Fc. Science 2008, 320:373–376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Washburn N, et al. : Controlled tetra-Fc sialylation of IVIg results in a drug candidate with consistent enhanced anti-inflammatory activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015, 112:E1297–E1306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Nelms K, et al. : The IL-4 receptor: signaling mechanisms and biologic functions. Annu Rev Immunol 1999, 17:701–738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ewart MA, Ozanne BW, Cushley W: The CD23a and CD23b proximal promoters display different sensitivities to exogenous stimuli in B lymphocytes. Genes Immun 2002, 3:158–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Maamary J, et al. : Increasing the breadth and potency of response to the seasonal influenza virus vaccine by immune complex immunization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2017, 114:10172–10177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Junker F, Gordon J, Qureshi O: Fc gamma receptors and their role in antigen uptake, presentation, and T cell activation. Front Immunol 2020, 11:1393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Amigorena S, et al. : Tyrosine-containing motif that transduces cell activation signals also determines internalization and antigen presentation via type III receptors for IgG. Nature 1992, 358:337–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bruhns P: Properties of mouse and human IgG receptors and their contribution to disease models. Blood 2012, 119:5640–5649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Baker K, et al. : The role of FcRn in antigen presentation. Front Immunol 2014, 5:408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Regnault A, et al. : Fcgamma receptor-mediated induction of dendritic cell maturation and major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted antigen presentation after immune complex internalization. J Exp Med 1999, 189:371–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Herter S, et al. : Glycoengineering of therapeutic antibodies enhances monocyte/macrophage-mediated phagocytosis and cytotoxicity. J Immunol 2014, 192:2252–2260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Hoepel W, et al. : High titers and low fucosylation of early human anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG promote inflammation by alveolar macrophages. Sci Transl Med 2021, 13:eabf8654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Tacken PJ, et al. : Targeting DC-SIGN via its neck region leads to prolonged antigen residence in early endosomes, delayed lysosomal degradation, and cross-presentation. Blood 2011, 118:4111–4119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Cruz LJ, et al. : Comparison of antibodies and carbohydrates to target vaccines to human dendritic cells via DC-SIGN. Biomaterials 2012, 33:4229–4239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Cruz LJ, et al. : ICAM3-Fc outperforms receptor-specific antibodies targeted nanoparticles to dendritic cells for cross-presentation. Molecules 2019, 24:E1825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Li R-JE, et al. : Systematic dual targeting of dendritic cell C-type lectin receptor DC-SIGN and TLR7 using a trifunctional mannosylated antigen. Front Chem 2019, 7:650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Maamary J, et al. : Newcastle disease virus expressing a dendritic cell-targeted HIV gag protein induces a potent gag-specific immune response in mice. J Virol 2011,85:2235–2246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Bournazos S, Ravetch JV: Fcgamma receptor function and the design of vaccination strategies. Immunity 2017, 47:224–233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
