Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2022 Dec 23;14(12):e32877. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32877

The Outcome of Pregnancy Among Tobacco Users in Tertiary Care Hospital of Chhattisgarh Province of India

Tripti Nagaria 1, Neha Singh 2,, Himani Punshi 1, Monika Dengani 3, Shailendra Agrawal 3, Kamlesh Jain 3, Nirmal Verma 3, Smrity Naik 1
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC9870601  PMID: 36699785

Abstract

Background: Tobacco use is responsible for numerous adverse pregnancy outcomes for females and their infants. The aim of this study was to explore the adverse outcome of tobacco use among pregnant females.

Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1250 females in the third trimester of pregnancy from April to June 2022, which were exposed to tobacco use in the form of gudaku, tobacco chewing, gutka, or smoking. Complications and outcomes during and after pregnancy were recorded based on self-administered questionnaires. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY) software version 20.0 for categorical data, frequencies (n) and percentages (%) were calculated, and the chi-square test was used for determining intergroup differences.

Results: Out of 1250 females, tobacco exposure was present among 429 (34.3%), and 821 (65.7%) had no tobacco exposure. Of 429, 36.10% of females complained about complications such as abortion (1.60%), antepartum hemorrhage (0.90%), congenital anomaly (0.20%), infertility (1.20%), intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) (0.50%), intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) (0.90%), oligohydramnios (OLIGO) (3.30%), preterm labor (18.40%), premature rupture of membrane (6.30%), and anemia (2.80%), which were slightly higher than the females with no tobacco exposure. In tobacco users, obstructive complications were found to be significant with a p value of 0.0036.

Conclusion: Our study concluded that tobacco use could have an adverse effect on their fetus and infants, as well as the pregnant females themselves. Policymakers need to ensure effective strategies that pregnant females, their partners, and close relatives need to have enough knowledge to avoid potential risks.

Keywords: tobacco adverse effects, tobacco users, fetal outcome, pregnancy outcome, pregnancy

Introduction

Smoking has assorted adverse effects on pregnant females and their developing fetuses, including a variety of squeals that will stay with the fetus for the rest of her life. Smoking in any form creates risks and adverse effects on maternal and neonatal outcomes [1]. Smoking during pregnancy, whether actively or passively, increases the chance of spontaneous abortion, placenta previa (when the placenta partially or fully blocks the internal cervical os), and placental abruption (premature separation of the placenta from the uterine wall). Additionally, smoking cigarettes that contain tobacco increases the risk of premature membrane rupture, placenta previa, and preterm delivery [2]. Numerous studies carried out in various nations have demonstrated a significant inverse relationship between maternal smoking during pregnancy and birth weight or significant positive associations between maternal smoking during pregnancy and the risk of low birth weight (LBW), preterm birth, and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth [3-6]. On the other hand, the impact of a pregnant female who smokes passively is uncertain and has not been thoroughly researched [5-7]. Since the person who inhales the smoke frequently has no choice, passive smoking is also known as "involuntary smoking."

Smoking during pregnancy, whether actively or passively, has long been regarded as a significant risk factor for intrauterine development retardation [8]. There is strong epidemiological evidence that smoking during pregnancy increases the incidence of placenta previa, abruption of the placenta, early rupture of membranes, and preterm delivery [9]. In addition to other negative consequences, maternal smoking was found to be strongly related to preterm delivery; intrauterine growth retardation; a small head circumference; a low appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration (APGAR) score at five minutes and stillbirths; and neonatal deaths, in a Swedish study of females who gave birth between 1983 and 1996 [10]. Despite the fact that environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure was not significantly correlated with the risk of low birth weight (LBW) or preterm delivery, a study found a significant association between ETS exposure and lower mean birth weight (weighted mean difference: 60 g; 95% confidence interval {CI}: 89-39 g) [11]. It is a known fact that the primary preventable cause of death and disease among people is tobacco use. According to the World Health Organization, smoking contributes to an estimated five million premature deaths during pregnancy worldwide in each year [12]. Chhattisgarh has the highest consumption of tobacco across the country with 39.1% of people in the state using tobacco, and it is believed that in this state, the female ratio of tobacco users is not less than that of males. Hence, the present study was designed to investigate further the effects of tobacco use in pregnant females and adverse pregnancy outcomes at the primary level on pregnant females admitted to tertiary care in Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Memorial Hospital, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The outcome variables included obstetric complications such as abortion, antepartum hemorrhage, congenital anomaly, infertility, intrauterine fetal death (IUFD), intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), oligohydramnios (OLIGO), premature rapture of membrane (PROM), anemia, mode of delivery, fetal weight (kg), APGAR score, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Dr. BRAM Hospital, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India. The inclusion criteria for the study group consisted of all pregnant females who were getting admitted for delivery between the ages of 20 and 40 years with singleton pregnancies and having no chronic illnesses such as diabetes, arthritis, Alzheimer's disease, cancer, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Antenatal patients with a history of major medical illnesses and surgery in the recent past year; with known cases of neurological and mental illnesses (anxiety disorders, epilepsy, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder {PTSD}, etc.); on medications, e.g., benzodiazepines, amphetamines, opioids, or any neuroleptics; and with addiction to alcohol were excluded from the study. A total of 1250 females were admitted for delivery who were interviewed for tobacco use based on the predesigned pro forma.

The sample size was calculated using Cochran’s formula. The z-value is 1.96 at 95% confidence interval, the proportion of tobacco consumption among pregnant females is 0.62, and the desired level of precision is 5%. Females were enrolled with the gestational age taken between 28 and 37 weeks at delivery. The study period for recruitment was from April to June 2022. The study approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) of Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru Memorial (JNM) Medical College (No./MC/Ethics/2022/178). Informed written consent was obtained from each of the pregnant females before taking an interview to enroll in the study. Pregnant females were interviewed based on a predesigned questionnaire at the time of delivery, and background characteristics such as educational status, age group, occupation, diet, tobacco use, period of using tobacco (in years), and gestation age were recorded. Active tobacco users included in the study were the females who used tobacco in the form of gudaku, tobacco chewing, gutka, and smoking. Passive users were considered females who breathe in secondhand smoke regularly as a result of having a smoker at home or at the workplace. The period of tobacco exposure included was from less than one year to more than 10 years. Abortion, antepartum hemorrhage, congenital anomaly, infertility, IUFD, IUGR, OLIGO, preterm labor, PROM, anemia, mode of delivery such as normal vaginal delivery (NVD), preterm vaginal delivery (PTVD), vaginal-induced delivery (VID), fetal weight (kg), APGAR score at one minute and five minutes, NICU admission needed or not for the newborn were recorded as outcome measures of obstetric complications. Maternal anemia, defined as hemoglobin of <11 g/dL at the time of delivery, was also recorded. For categorical data, frequencies (n) and percentages (%) were calculated using the statistical analysis program Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY) software version 20.0, and the chi-square test was used to identity the association between the categorical variables.

Results

Pregnant females admitted to the hospital were interviewed before delivery based on pre-designed and self-administered questionnaires. Based on their background characteristics (Table 1)

Table 1. Background characteristics of pregnant females and newborn.

APGAR: appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration; LSCS: lower segment cesarian section; NICU: neonatal intensive care unit; NVD: normal vaginal delivery; PTVD: preterm vaginal delivery; VEG: vegetarian; VID: vaginal-induced delivery

Background characteristics Frequency Percentage
Educational status Illiterate 105 8.4
Primary 201 16.1
Secondary 650 52
Higher secondary 197 15.8
Graduate 97 7.8
Age (years) ≤20 94 7.5
21-25 722 57.8
26-30 380 30.4
31-35 50 4
36-40 4 0.3
Occupation Housewife 1249 99.9
Private job 1 0.1
Diet Mixed 1078 86.2
VEG 172 13.8
Tobacco users (gudaku, tobacco chewing, gutka, or smoking) No 821 65.7
Yes 429 34.3
Gestational age Less than 28 25 2
28-32 50 4
33-37 216 17.3
More than 37 959 76.7
Obstetric complication Absent 819 65.5
Present 431 34.5
Mode of delivery Abortion 20 1.6
LSCS 535 42.8
NVD 685 54.8
PTVD 1 0.1
VID 9 0.7
Sex (baby) Female 593 47.4
Male 637 51
Not known (aborted) 20 1.6
Newborn weight (kg) <1.5 56 4.5
1.5-2.5 313 25
2.5-3.5 867 69.4
>3.5 14 1.1
APGAR score at the first minute Less than 7 857 68.6
7 or more 393 31.4
APGAR score at the fifth minute Less than 7 231 18.5
7 or more 1019 81.5
NICU Admission Need resuscitation 16 1.3
NICU admission 40 3.2
No 1194 95.5
  Total 1250 100

Educational status was recorded as secondary school (52%), illiterate (8.4%), graduation (7.8%), primary (16.1%), and higher secondary (15.8%). Most of the pregnant females belonged to the age group of 21-25 years (57.8%) and 26-30 years (30.4%); however, very few, only four females, in the age group of 36-40 years (0.3%) participated in the study. Of 1250, 1249 (99.9%) were homemakers, whereas only one (0.1%) was a private professional; 1078 (86.2%) were from a mixed diet, and 172 (13.8%) were vegetarian; out of 1250, 429 (34.3%) were tobacco users, and 821 (65.7%) were non-users. Most of the females, 959 (76.7%), admitted to the hospital were from more than 37 weeks, whereas only 25 (2%) were from less than 28 weeks. Overall, obstetric complications were found in 431 (34.5%) pregnant females out of 1250. Natural vaginal delivery (NVD) happened in 54.8% of females and lower segment cesarian section (LSCS) in 42.8%. A total of 637 (52%) male babies and 593 (47.4%) female babies were born from the females admitted to the hospital, whereas 20 (1.6%) newborns got aborted; 867 (69.4%) newborns had birth weights of 2.5-3.5 kg, and 56 (4.5%) and 14 (1.1%) babies had birth weights of more than 3.5 kg and less than 1.5 kg, respectively; 1.3% and 3.2% of babies needed NICU resuscitation and NICU admission, respectively, while 95.5% of babies did not need any NICU admission (Table 2).

Table 2. Obstetric complications present among pregnant females.

IUFD: intrauterine fetal death; IUGR: intrauterine growth restriction; OLIGO: oligohydramnios; PROM: premature rapture of membrane

Obstetric complication Tobacco non-users (n=821) Tobacco users (n=429)
Number % Number %
No complication 590 71.90 274 63.90
Abortion 8 1.00 7 1.60
Antepartum hemorrhage 10 1.20 4 0.90
Congenital anomaly 1 0.10 1 0.20
Infertility 6 0.70 5 1.20
IUFD 6 0.70 2 0.50
IUGR 11 1.30 4 0.90
Low amniotic fluid (OLIGO) 24 2.90 14 3.30
Preterm labor 117 14.30 79 18.40
PROM 26 3.20 27 6.30
Anemia 22 2.70 12 2.80
Total 821 100.00 429 100.00

Table 3 depicted obstetric complications during pregnancy in tobacco-exposed and nonexposed pregnant females; it was found that complications were slightly higher in the females who were consuming tobacco. Females who use tobacco were found preterm with other complications, PROM, low amniotic fluid, and infertility, 18.40%, 3.20%, 3.30%, and 1.20% respectively, which were slightly higher as compared to non-users (14.30%, 3.20%, 2.90%, and 0.70%, respectively).

Table 3. Association of tobacco users and non-users with maternal and neonatal outcome.

APGAR: appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration; df: degrees of freedom; LSCS: lower segment cesarian section; NICU: neonatal intensive care unit; NS: not significant; NVD: normal vaginal delivery; S: significant; PTVD: preterm vaginal delivery; VID: vaginal-induced delivery

Maternal and child characteristics Tobacco exposure    
Absent (n=821) Present (n=429) Chi-square df P value
Number % Number %      
Educational status Graduation 64 7.80 33 7.70 1.739 4 0.784 (NS)
Higher secondary 122 14.90 75 17.50
Illiterate 72 8.80 33 7.70
Primary 134 16.30 67 15.60
Secondary 429 52.30 221 51.50
Age group ≤20 65 7.90 29 6.80 4.768 4 0.312 (NS)
21-25 476 58.00 246 57.30
26-30 250 30.50 130 30.30
31-35 29 3.50 21 4.90
36-40 1 0.10 3 0.70
Gestational age at the time of delivery 28-32 29 3.50 21 4.90 5.081 3 0.166 (NS)
33-37 142 17.30 74 17.20
More than 37 638 77.70 321 74.80
Less than 28 12 1.50 13 3.00
Obstetric complication Absent 590 71.86 274 63.86 8.436 1 0.0036 (S)
Present 231 28.13 155 36.13
Mode of delivery Abortion 10 1.20 10 2.30 4.212 4 0.378 (NS)
LSCS 360 43.80 175 40.80
NVD 443 54.00 242 56.40
PTVD 1 0.10 0 0.00
VID 7 0.90 2 0.50
Newborn weight <1.5 32 3.90 24 5.60 2.001 3 0.572 (NS)
>3.5 9 1.10 5 1.20
1.5-2.5 209 25.50 104 24.20
2.5-3.5 571 69.50 296 69.00
APGAR score at the first minute 7 or more 269 32.80 124 28.90 1.948 1 0.163 (NS)
Less than 7 552 67.20 305 71.10
APGAR score at the fifth minute 7 or more 690 84.00 329 76.70 10.115 1 0.001 (S)
Less than 7 131 16.00 100 23.30
NICU admission Need resuscitation 8 1.00 8 1.90 2.403 2 0.301 (NS)
NICU admission 24 2.90 16 3.70
No 789 96.10 405 94.40
Total 821 100.00 429 100.00      

A significant association was found between the use of tobacco with obstetric complications and an APGAR score at five minutes with an odds ratio of 1.43 and 1.60, respectively.

Discussion

The current status of Indian tobacco control strategies appears to be supported by the findings and suggestions from international studies. However, India has a far wider range of tobacco and health issues, necessitating the development of plans with the aid of regional studies on tobacco control. Indian females don't traditionally smoke or use tobacco, but this perception is changing recently with time [13]. Smoking or tobacco use especially during pregnancy has been firmly shown to have a number of negative impacts on the fetus. Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) reveals that in a span of five years, tobacco use in females increased at a higher rate of 25.2%-41.6% from the years 2005-2006 to 2009-2010 [14]. According to our present findings, pregnant females with tobacco exposure complained about obstructive complications such as abortion (1.60%), antepartum hemorrhage (0.90%), congenital anomaly (0.20%), infertility (1.20%), intrauterine fetal death (0.50%), intrauterine growth restriction (0.90%), oligohydramnios (3.30%), preterm labor (18.40%), premature rupture of membrane (6.30%), and anemia (2.80%). Obstructive complications were found to be significant with a p value of 0.0036 and APGAR score at the fifth minute with a p value of 0.001. Likewise, other research findings also indicate that tobacco use in the form of smoking or smokeless while pregnant reduces the birth weight of an unborn baby, shortens gestational age, and raises the risk of stillbirth [15,16].

Smoking during pregnancy has indeed been linked to premature membrane rupture, abruptio placentae, placenta previa, preterm birth, intrauterine growth restriction, and sudden infant death syndrome. According to some research, smoking causes 15% of premature births, 20%-30% of low birth weight of babies, and a 15% increase in overall perinatal death. One of the most significant risk factors linked to poor perinatal outcomes is cigarette smoking [17]. Research also showed that prenatal exposure to tobacco increases the incidence of respiratory infections, allergies, asthma, and pediatric cancer, as well as has neurobehavioral effects on the children's health in the long term. It has been discovered that the high quantity of tobacco use during pregnancy increases the risk of the majority of these illnesses [18]. The findings from a multiple linear regression analysis also showed the effects of maternal smoking on birth outcomes that newborns that were exposed to nicotine (through urine cotinine levels higher than 5 g/ml) during pregnancy experienced a birth weight reduction of around 100 g than the normal range [19]. In nearly one-third of maternal and cord blood samples from the tobacco-exposed group, nicotine absorption was recorded in investigations. Because the liver enzyme CYP2A6 is activated during pregnancy, the metabolism of nicotine and cotinine increases by 60% and 40%, respectively [20].

Some biochemical factors have been proposed; however, the exact mechanism by which prenatal exposure to cigarette toxins predisposes to stillbirth is not yet fully understood. A substantial risk factor for stillbirth is fetal hypoxia, which is caused when carbon monoxide from tobacco smoking binds to hemoglobin and creates carboxyhemoglobin in both maternal and fetal blood [21,22]. Nicotine has been demonstrated to have negative direct effects on a number of key processes in the development of the placenta, including a decrease in placental angiogenic factors and an inhibitory effect on trophoblast invasion [23], which can result in both direct placental complications and fetal growth restriction [24]. Females who are passionate may be more prone to smoke and have impulsive children, or prenatal tobacco exposure may result in more impulsive offspring. Research from animal experimental research proves particular CNS changes brought on by prenatal nicotine exposure that may have an impact on the behavior in offspring. As a result, the observed adverse results are most probably triggered by both genetic and teratological etiologies [25]. It has been also reported somewhere that smokeless tobacco use during pregnancy is associated with lower hemoglobin levels; however, further exploration and clarification of this association need to be done for the wellness of public health. Our study's findings are consistent with the concept that tobacco exposure in any form during pregnancy has a negative impact on the pregnancy, newborn, and birth process. Confounding factors such as genetic predisposition that could not be excluded in the present study and previous obstetric history that was not properly recorded to look for factors that can affect present pregnancy outcomes can be regarded as the limitations of the current study. Further, we are planning to conduct a long-term longitudinal research plan on tobacco effects during pregnancy and their outcomes in neonates in a more expanded way in the state of Chhattisgarh where female tobacco users are more and research is unexplored in this direction.

Conclusions

Our study findings indicated an adverse effect on their fetus and infants, as well as the pregnant females themselves who were exposed to tobacco. As per GATS 2016-2017, Chhattisgarh has a high percentage of tobacco users (39.1%), and among them, 24.6% were female tobacco users, which is highly significant. Policymakers need to ensure effective plans and strategies regarding tobacco use that pregnant females and their close relatives need to have enough knowledge about to avoid potential risks. Recently, the government and policymakers are using research-based data to create policies and guidelines for tobacco control in society, especially for pregnant females. These actions should consider the pertinent research findings from India for promoting tobacco control. Indian research activities in the fields of tobacco control and public health welfare must be reinforced to overcome such complications. Despite of high burden of tobacco use in Chhattisgarh, very few research have been done to show the impact of tobacco use among pregnant females and its outcome. A longitudinal research plan in Chhattisgarh state is needed to conclude long-term issues related to tobacco use during pregnancy to generate more data from such region of India where females are significantly using tobacco and tobacco-based products.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section.

Tripti Nagaria, Himani Punshi, Smrity Naik, Neha Singh, Monika Dengani, Shailendra Agrawal, Kamlesh Jain, and Nirmal Verma declare(s) a grant from the National Tobacco Control Program (NTCP), Chhattisgarh, India. The authors are thankful for the motivation and financial support of the National Tobacco Control Program (NTCP), Department of Health and Family Welfare, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. The Institutional Ethics Committee of Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru Memorial (JNM) Medical College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India, issued approval No./MC/Ethics/2022/178. Human (pregnant females) participants were involved as they were interviewed for tobacco use or not, and pregnancy outcomes were recorded. No any live tissues or no other biological samples were collected for experimentation purpose.

Animal Ethics

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

References

  • 1.Effects of nicotine during pregnancy: human and experimental evidence. Wickström R. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2007;5:213–222. doi: 10.2174/157015907781695955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reddy KS, Gupta PC. India. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2004. Report on tobacco control in India. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maternal smoking and causes of very preterm birth. Kyrklund-Blomberg NB, Granath F, Cnattingius S. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:572–577. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00848.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Prepregnancy risk factors for placental abruption. TikKanen M, Nuutila M, Hiilesmaa V, Paavonen J, Ylikorkala O. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:40–44. doi: 10.1080/00016340500324241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Smoking during pregnancy: subsequent effects on offspring immune competence and disease vulnerability in later life. Ng SP, Zelikoff JT. Reprod Toxicol. 2007;23:428–437. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Prepregnancy body mass index, smoking during pregnancy, and infant birth weight. La Merrill M, Stein CR, Landrigan P, Engel SM, Savitz DA. Ann Epidemiol. 2011;21:413–420. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Smoking and smoking cessation during early pregnancy and its effect on adverse pregnancy outcomes and fetal growth. Vardavas CI, Chatzi L, Patelarou E, et al. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169:741–748. doi: 10.1007/s00431-009-1107-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Spontaneous preterm birth and small for gestational age infants in women who stop smoking early in pregnancy: prospective cohort study. McCowan LM, Dekker GA, Chan E, et al. BMJ. 2009;338:0. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Smoking, nicotine and tar and risk of small for gestational age babies. Mitchell EA, Thompson JM, Robinson E, et al. Acta Paediatr. 2002;91:323–328. doi: 10.1080/08035250252834003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Risk factors for preterm birth: a prospective cohort study. Ye CX, Chen SB, Wang TT, Zhang SM, Qin JB, Chen LZ. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2021;23:1242–1249. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2108015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fetal tobacco syndrome and perinatal outcome. Habek D, Habek JC, Ivanisević M, Djelmis J. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2002;17:367–371. doi: 10.1159/000065387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Prenatal smoking cessation and the risk of delivering preterm and small-for-gestational-age newborns. Polakowski LL, Akinbami LJ, Mendola P. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:318–325. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ae9e9c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tobacco use among school personnel in Bihar, India. Sinha DN, Gupta PC, Pednekar MS, Jones JT, Warren CW. Tob Control. 2002;11:82–83. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.1.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.The Times of India: women outdo men in tobacco consumption in Chhattisgarh: Raipur news. 2022. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/raipur/eventlist/17388717.cms?cfmid=10099000 https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/raipur/eventlist/17388717.cms?cfmid=10099000
  • 15.Smokeless tobacco use, birth weight, and gestational age: population based, prospective cohort study of 1217 women in Mumbai, India. Gupta PC, Subramoney S. BMJ. 2004;328:1538. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38113.687882.EB. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Perinatal complications associated with maternal tobacco use. Andres RL, Day MC. Semin Neonatol. 2000;5:231–241. doi: 10.1053/siny.2000.0025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.[Influence of smoking during pregnancy on children's health--overview of epidemiologic studies] [Article in Polish] Polańska K, Hanke W. http://www.przeglepidemiol.pzh.gov.pl/palenie-papierosow-przez-kobiety-w-ciazy-a-stan-zdrowia-dzieci-przeglad-badan-epidemiologicznych?lang=pl. Przegl Epidemiol. 2005;59:117–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Maternal smoking during pregnancy, urine cotinine concentrations, and birth outcomes. A prospective cohort study. Wang X, Tager IB, Van Vunakis H, Speizer FE, Hanrahan JP. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26:978–988. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.5.978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.The exposure of nonsmoking and smoking mothers to environmental tobacco smoke during different gestational phases and fetal growth. Dejmek J, Solansk y I, Podrazilová K, Srám RJ. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:601–606. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nicotine chemistry, metabolism, kinetics and biomarkers. Benowitz NL, Hukkanen J, Jacob P 3rd. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009:29–60. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69248-5_2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tobacco and pregnancy. Rogers JM. Reprod Toxicol. 2009;28:152–160. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cigarette smoking during pregnancy. Shea AK, Steiner M. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008;10:267–278. doi: 10.1080/14622200701825908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Characterization of the adverse effects of nicotine on placental development: in vivo and in vitro studies. Holloway AC, Salomon A, Soares MJ, et al. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;306:0–56. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00478.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.The epidemiology of stillbirth. Cnattingius S, Stephansson O. Semin Perinatol. 2002;26:25–30. doi: 10.1053/sper.2002.29841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Personality and the inheritance of smoking behavior: a genetic perspective. Heath AC, Madden PA, Slutske WS, Martin NG. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02196921. Behav Genet. 1995;25:103–117. doi: 10.1007/BF02196921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES