Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 20;56:101816. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101816

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with intermediate-stage recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) after propensity score matching (PSM).

Variable Comparison Overall survival
Progression-free survival
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Recurrent stage data
Tumour diameter. cm ≤3 vs. >3 1.54 (1.12–2.11) 0.007 1.89 (1.46–2.44) <0.001
Tumour number ≤3 vs. >3 2.57 (1.81–3.63) <0.001 2.80 (2.21–3.69) <0.001
Recurrent stage Late vs. Early 1.81 (1.28–2.56) 0.001 1.66 (1.27–2.16) <0.001
Types of treatment TACE-sorafenib + RFA vs. TACE-sorafenib 2.41 (1.77–3.26) <0.001 2.71 (2.10–3.50) <0.001
Initial hepatectomy stage data
Tumour diameter, cm ≤5 Reference
>5, <10 1.68 (0.89–2.58) 0.074
BCLC stage ≥10 1.92 (1.18–3.12) 0.009
BCLC stage A vs. B 1.45 (1.05–2.00) 0.022 1.44 (1.11–1.86) 0.006
MVI Negative vs. Positive 1.54 (1.14–2.09) 0.005 1.24 (0.94–1.63) 0.127

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; MVI, microvascular invasion.