Skip to main content
BMJ Open Access logoLink to BMJ Open Access
. 2022 Apr 11;72(2):219–220. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327089

Epithelial RAC1 niches in IBD: from barrier integrity to cytoskeletal plasticity

Lea-Maxie Haag 1, Britta Siegmund 1,
PMCID: PMC9872230  PMID: 35410889

The gastrointestinal tract forms the largest contact area with the environment and tightly regulated mechanisms are needed to maintain intestinal homoeostasis. The inner lining of the gastrointestinal tract—the monolayer of intestinal epithelial cells (IECs)—therefore is a key contributor to this delicate balance. Barrier disruption and epithelial leakage can provoke a virtuous circle, where an exaxerbated immune response against environmental factors and microbes can result in chronic inflammation.1

Already in the 1980s, transmission electron microscopy and freeze fracture electron microscopy revealed ultrastructural changes in the junctional complexes between IECs in biopsies from patients with IBD.2 Patients with IBD often present with epithelial leakage, moreover states of remission frequently present with sustained increased intestinal permeability.3 The importance of epithelial disruption in susceptibility to IBD development is further supported by the observation that multiple IBD susceptibility genes encode proteins involved in limiting the penetration of bacterial symbionts into the mucosal site and involved in promoting bacterial killing.4 5

The intestinal epithelium stands out for being the most proliferative tissue in the vertebrate body that renews itself every few days through a physiological circuit of cell renewal, differentiation, proliferation and physiological cell shedding. All of these processes are central to maintaining barrier integrity and mucosal homoeostasis.6 On a subcellular level, the cytoskeleton is the central scaffold to epithelial integrity and stable cell–cell junctions are needed to control paracellular permeability.7 During inflammation, proinflammatory mediators engender cytoskeletal rearrangements resulting in a breakdown of epithelial integrity and increased permeability.8 Both small and large GTPases have been shown to be involved in cytoskeletal rearrangements in the context of chronic inflammation.9 10 Previously, López-Posadas et al were able to make decisive progress in understanding cellular and molecular events underlying cytoskeletal plasticity. Using conditional murine models, small GTPases were shown to especially impact on small intestinal integrity whereas the large intestinal epithelium turned out to be less affected.10

In Gut, Martínez-Sánchez et al have addressed the impact of the prenylation enzyme geranylgeranyltransferase-1 (GGT-1) and RAC1 on cell shedding alterations and barrier integrity in IBD.11 First, they took advantage of murine conditional GGTase and RAC1 knock-out models (Pggt1b iΔIEC and Rac1 iΔIEC) to study functional consequences of epithelial specific knockouts. Inhibition of prenylation within IECs (Pggt1b iΔIEC mice) resulted in increased intestinal permeability and barrier disruption over time accompanied by an inflammatory response in the small intestine. Intravital microscopy revealed impaired cell shedding dynamics finally resulting in cytoskeleton redistribution, cell overcrowding and altered actomyosin dynamics. Real time fluorescence deformability cytometry in GGTase-deficient IECs revealed alterations in cellular mechanics on a single cell level. Moreover, regulated protein expression on epithelial deletion of Pggt1b suggested potential changes of intercellular junctions and a redistribution of Apical Junction Complexes. To determine whether the observed intestinal phenotype was caspase-mediated, Martínez-Sánchez et al applied elegant kinetics, ruling out apoptosis and also necroptosis and pyroptotic cell death as initial events but suggesting those as secondary mechanisms on cytoskeleton rearrangement. Also, altered proliferation as potential underlying mechanism was also only observed at late timepoints after induced Pggt1b deletion.

To disentangle molecular mechanisms behind the observed phenotype, the authors concentrated on prenylation targets and identified RAC1 as a GGTase target critically involved in the observed phenotype. Strikingly, Rac1 iΔIEC mice phenocopied intestinal pathologies found on conditional GGTase deletion, again predominantly in the small intestine. A reductionist in vitro approach using small intestinal organoids from both Pggt1b iΔIEC and Rac1 iΔIEC mice enabled the identification of potential underlying mechanisms. Both GGTase and RAC1-deficient organoids displayed decreased cell viability as indicator of epithelial disruption and showed cytoskeleton rearrangement and altered cell mechanics therefore recalling the in vivo phenotype. Precious hints derived from RNASeq analysis in RAC1-deficient small intestinal organoids showing regulated expression of genes involved in response mechanisms to both bacterial and mechanical stimuli as well as immune responses.

This study than nicely turns the attention towards a potential impact on clinical practice. Tissue samples from patients with IBD displayed signs of impaired epithelial integrity and moreover indications of arrested cell shedding as seen in murine models. To close the line of arguments and unravel the linkage between cytoskeleton rearrangement and epithelial leakage, the authors moved to human two-dimensional organoids and cell lines. Treatment of Caco-2 and HT29 cells with the RAC1 inhibitor NSC-23766 or GGTI-298 resulted in decreased transepithelial resistance and correlated with actin redistribution. Therefore, Martínez-Sánchez et al were able to confirm the link between RAC1-dependent epithelial alterations and epithelial barrier function as observed in the inflamed gut, once more underlining its clinical relevance. RAC1 dysfunction in IBD tissue was further supported by elegant studies investigating the subcellular localisation along the crypt-villus axis. Given that RAC1 is a known activator of a protein complex known as the WAVE regulatory complex, the authors analysed WAVE proteins to investigate potential activations of RAC1-downstream pathways. WAVE proteins are indispensably involved in the dynamics of actin filaments within a cell and therefore cellular integrity12 13 and its expression and stability was reduced on Rac1 deletion. The authors observed decreased WAVE1 expression in IBD tissue and most interestingly a changed expression pattern along the crypt-villus axis, suggesting distinct niches of RAC1 dysfunction in IBD. Proteasome inhibition partly rescued disturbed cell shedding events in RAC1-deficient small intestinal organoids, pointing towards the relevance of RAC1 function and downstream pathway activation, moreover underlining its inevitably involvement in cytoskeleton constitution and therefore IEC integrity in patients with IBD.

The novelty of the here presented work is not the role of Rac1 and cell integrity for intestinal homoeostasis, but rather that epithelial intrinsic alterations due to absent GGTase or RAC1 function lead to an intestinal phenotype reminiscent of alterations seen in IBD tissue. In addition, these GGTase-dependent and consecutively RAC1-dependent alterations were predominantly found in the small intestine, reemphasising that small intestinal inflammation is distinct from colonic inflammation and deserves to be studied separately in order to identify site-specific therapeutic targets.14 Together here described RAC1 function, therefore, represents a promising, attractive target for future diagnosis and treatment algorithms in particular for small intestinal Crohn’s disease.

Footnotes

Contributors: BS and L-MH wrote the commentary jointly.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: BS has served as consultant for Abbvie, Arena, BMS, Boehringer, Celgene, Falk, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Prometheus and Takeda and received speaker’s fees from Abbvie, CED Service, Falk, Ferring, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda (payments were made to the institution).

Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

References

  • 1. de Souza HSP, Fiocchi C. Immunopathogenesis of IBD: current state of the art. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;13:13–27. 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Marin ML, Geller SA, Greenstein AJ, et al. Ultrastructural pathology of Crohn's disease: correlated transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and freeze fracture studies. Am J Gastroenterol 1983;78:355–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Vivinus-Nébot M, Frin-Mathy G, Bzioueche H, et al. Functional bowel symptoms in quiescent inflammatory bowel diseases: role of epithelial barrier disruption and low-grade inflammation. Gut 2014;63:744–52. 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Macpherson AJ, Slack E, Geuking MB, et al. The mucosal firewalls against commensal intestinal microbes. Semin Immunopathol 2009;31:145–9. 10.1007/s00281-009-0174-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Belkaid Y, Hand TW. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell 2014;157:121–41. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Crosnier C, Stamataki D, Lewis J. Organizing cell renewal in the intestine: stem cells, signals and combinatorial control. Nat Rev Genet 2006;7:349–59. 10.1038/nrg1840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Koch S, Nusrat A. Dynamic regulation of epithelial cell fate and barrier function by intercellular junctions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009;1165:220–7. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04025.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Mehta S, Nijhuis A, Kumagai T, et al. Defects in the adherens junction complex (E-cadherin/ β-catenin) in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell Tissue Res 2015;360:749–60. 10.1007/s00441-014-1994-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. López-Posadas R, Stürzl M, Atreya I, et al. Interplay of GTPases and cytoskeleton in cellular barrier defects during gut inflammation. Front Immunol 2017;8:1240. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. López-Posadas R, Becker C, Günther C, et al. Rho-A prenylation and signaling link epithelial homeostasis to intestinal inflammation. J Clin Invest 2016;126:611–26. 10.1172/JCI80997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Martínez-Sánchez LDC, Ngo PA, Pradhan R, et al. Epithelial RAC1-dependent cytoskeleton dynamics controls cell mechanics, cell shedding and barrier integrity in intestinal inflammation. Gut 2023;72:275–94. 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Chen B, Brinkmann K, Chen Z, et al. The WAVE regulatory complex links diverse receptors to the actin cytoskeleton. Cell 2014;156:195–207. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Chen Z, Borek D, Padrick SB, et al. Structure and control of the actin regulatory WAVE complex. Nature 2010;468:533–8. 10.1038/nature09623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Atreya R, Siegmund B. Location is important: differentiation between ileal and colonic Crohn's disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;18:544–58. 10.1038/s41575-021-00424-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES