Abstract
Introduction:
Lipomas of the of the head and neck region are rare, more so in the retropharyngeal space. Lipomas in this region can produce symptoms that demand surgical excision. This paper describes a case of lipomatous hamartoma of the retropharynx, which to the best of our knowledge has not yet been reported in English literature.
Case Report:
A 53-year-old gentleman presented to the ENT department with snoring, voice change and stridor. Examination revealed a smooth bulge in the posterior wall of the oropharynx causing near complete obstruction of the airway. A contrast enhanced computed tomogram revealed a non-enhancing hypodense lesion in the retropharyngeal space extending from C1-C4 level, which was suggestive of a lipoma. The tumour was surgically excised trans-orally. A limited review of literature is also presented.
Conclusion:
Trans-oral approach is preferred to external approach for surgical removal of benign retropharyngeal tumours that cause obstructive symptoms, as our case. This approach is safe, effective, and associated with lesser post-operative morbidity.
Key Words: Hamartoma, Retropharynx, Lipoma, Stridor, Trans-oral excision
Introduction
Lipomas are benign encapsulated tumours consisting of lobulated, slow growing mature adipocytes with minimal connective tissue stroma (1). Hamartomas are benign masses comprised of an admixture of cells and tissues indigenous to that site. Though initially thought to be developmental, these are now considered clonal due to the identification of chromosomal aberrations (2).
The retropharyngeal space is bounded on either side by the major neck vessels and lower cranial nerves making it a difficult region to gain access through the external approach. The trans-oral approach possesses the inherent advantage of avoiding the important neurovascular structures and lower post-operative morbidity (3). However, this vantage point is negated by the limited exposure and the compact narrow operating space available for manipulation with conventional instruments. Here we describe the clinical presentation of a 53-year-old gentleman with a retropharyngeal lipomatous hamartoma and its surgical management, which to the best of our knowledge has not yet been reported in the English literature. We had reviewed the PubMed database using the terms retropharynx and lipoma from the year 2005 till 2022. Only those case reports which provided information on the size, extent and surgical management were included in the review (Table.1).
Table 1.
Review of the English language reported cases of retropharyngeal lipomas from the year 2005 to 2022
| Serial No. | Authors | Size of lipoma(cm) | Superior extent | Inferior extent |
Parapharyngeal
extension |
Surgical approach |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ghammam M et al. (1) |
7.3X2.6X11.1 | C2 | C7 | yes | External |
| 2 | Aydin U et al. (3) | 12X7 | C2 | C6 | no | Trans-oral |
| 3 | Namyslowski G et al. (4) |
11.7X4.2X7.5 | oropharynx | superior mediastinum | yes | External |
| 4 | Radhakrishna Pillai OS et al. (5) | 8X5X11 | C1 | C7 | no | Trans-oral |
| 5 | Chua DY et al. (6) | 9.4X6.7 | C1 | C6 | yes | Trans-oral |
| 6 | Piccin O et al. (7) | 5X2X2.5 | skull base | C3 | no | Trans-oral |
| 7 | Heaton CM et al. (8) | 4.4X2.3X1.3 | C1 | C3 | no | TORS# |
| 8 | Lee HK et al. (9) | 10X5X11 | soft palate | thoracic inlet | yes | External |
| 9 | Jin SM et al. (10) | 3.3X4 | C1 | C3 | no | Trans-oral |
| 10 | Chrysovitsiotis G et al. (11) | 4.5X3X1.5 | Soft palate | Valleculae | no | Trans-oral |
| 11 | Luczak K et al. (12) | 8.5X5.8X7.2 | Skull base | Hyoid bone | yes | External |
Legends to Table1, C- Cervical vertebrae. # - TORS: Trans oral robotic surgery
Case Report
A 53-year-old gentleman with no co-morbidities presented to the outpatient department with complaints of noisy breathing for 20 days. He also gave history of progressive snoring and change in voice from 6 months. Examination revealed a smooth mass in the oropharynx extending inferiorly from the level of the base of tongue and superiorly beyond the level of the soft palate causing near complete obstruction of the oropharyngeal airway. A contrast enhanced computed tomogram (CECT) of the neck was done which was suggestive of a well-defined, non-enhancing fat density lesion in the retropharyngeal space measuring 8.2 cm craniocaudally, 4 cm antero-posteriorly and 6.2 cm transversely causing marked narrowing of the airway. The lesion is seen to compress the left carotid artery and displacing it laterally (Fig1). It was seen extending from the base of skull to the level of C5 vertebrae (Fig2).
Fig 1.

Axial section of the CECT neck showing a well-defined non enhancing fat density lesion severely compromising the oropharyngeal airway and displacing the carotid vessels laterally
Fig 2.

Cect Neck Sagittal Section- Lipoma Is Seen Extending From The Skull Base To Level Of C5
As the patient was in stridor he was immediately shifted to the operation theatre where he underwent a tracheostomy under local anaesthesia. Tracheostomy secured the airway and relieved the respiratory distress. A trans-oral core biopsy of the lesion was done in the same sitting which was reported as a lipoma and the patient was planned for trans oral excision under general anaesthesia.
Patient was placed in the Rose position. Exposure of the lipoma was achieved using a Boyle Davis mouth gag. The soft palate was retracted to expose the superior limit of the tumour. A vertical incision was made over the posterior pharyngeal wall and the constrictor muscles exposing the lipoma. Dissection was carried out from above downwards with traction over the tumour, releasing its attachments by blunt dissection. The tumour was found anterior to the prevertebral muscles within the confines of the retropharyngeal space. The tumour was delivered per-orally as a whole (Fig 3).
Fig 3.

Delivering the Retropharyngeal Lipoma in Toto through the Oral Cavity
Gross examination revealed a partly encapsulated tumour measuring 8x6x3.5cm with yellow fatty areas on cut section. Histopathological examination revealed a lipomatous hamartoma, which showed lobules of mature adipose tissue with skeletal muscle bundles, few nerves and fibrocollagenous tissue (Fig.4 A-B). Post-operative period was uneventful, the tracheostomy tube was decannulated on post operative day three. Patient was kept on Ryles tube feeds for a week.
Fig 4.

Lipomatous Hamartoma of the Retropharynx Showing A) Lobules of Mature Fibroadipose Tissue Separated By Skeletal Muscle Fibers (Black Arrows), Hematoxylin and Eosin, 100x; B) Skeletal Muscle Fibers Highlighted Red By Masson’s Trichrome Stain (Arrowheads), 100x
Discussion
Clinical presentation of benign retropharyngeal tumours depends on its location and size, it varies from a vague globus sensation, dysphagia, snoring with or without obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome or stridor with respiratory distress (4) or can be asymptomatic (13). Thirteen percent of lipomas occur in the head and neck region, and pharyngeal involvement is rare (5). Owing to the slow rate of growth, they are usually detected when the lipoma has reached a considerably large size (4) as may be the case here when snoring would have manifested years after the lipoma had appeared. On computed tomograms lipomas appear as homogenous hypodense lesions with attenuation varying from -50 to -150 Hounsfield units and does not enhance on contrast (1).
The pre-operative histological diagnosis was lipoma and the definitive treatment for a retropharyngeal lipoma is surgical excision (3,4). In this case, the lesion being well encapsulated was easily dissected out but its anatomical location posed a challenge with respect to access and exposure.
The retropharyngeal space is in close proximity to major neurovascular structures on either side making the external approach to this space fraught with potential serious complications (1,6). The trans - oral route adopted in this case may seem straight forward and simple. However, due to limited exposure and small compact working space make surgical manipulations very cumbersome and difficult. The exact location of the lipoma determines the surgical approach.
A significant lateral extension would warrant an external transcervical approach. Transoral excision of retropharyngeal lesions with parapharyngeal extension can be attempted, but visualisation of the lateral component of the tumour is compromised and dissection is done blindly with the finger (6).
In our review of literature, all the patients that underwent an external surgical approach had parapharyngeal extension and two cases with parapharyngeal extension were removed trans-orally. The largest dimension among the lipomas removed trans-orally and externally in our review were 12 cm and 11.7 cm respectively. The nasopharyngeal part of the lipoma in this case was visualised after retracting the soft palate anteriorly. The soft palate can also be split in midline to gain access to this part of the tumour (7). In our review the inferior most extent of the lipomas that were removed trans-orally and externally were C7 vertebrae level and superior mediastinum respectively. Our review showed that the superior most extent of the lipomas removed trans-orally and externally was the level of the skull base. The more recent trans oral robotic surgery technology have added better visualisation, magnification and dexterity within the oropharynx (8). Owing to the presence of skeletal muscle tissue and few nerve bundles on histopathology, the diagnosis of lipomatous hamartoma was suggested. Lipomatous hamartomas are rare, and have been reported at various sites like the retroperitoneum, subcutaneous sites, and the orbit (14). However, to the best of our knowledge, no similar case has been reported in the English literature.
Conclusion
Lipoma in the retropharyngeal space is very rare and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reporting of lipomatous hamartoma of the retropharynx. Complete surgical excision is curative. This case report shows that the trans oral route for surgical excision of benign retropharyngeal tumours such as a lipomatous hamartoma is a safe, feasible, and an effective option. The external approach provides better access but is associated with higher -operative morbidity.
References
- 1.Ghammam M, Houas J, Bellakhdher M, Abdelkefi M. A huge retropharyngeal lipoma: a rare cause of dysphagia: a case report and literature review. The Pan African Medical Journal. 2019:33. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.33.12.18541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ali SA, Mulita F. StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing ; 2022. Hamartoma. [Updated 2022 Jul 19] Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562298. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aydin U, Karakoc O, Binar M, Arslan F, Gerek M. Intraoral excision of a huge retropharyngeal lipoma causing dysphagia and obstructive sleep apnea. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2020 Jan;:86:s8–10. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Namyslowski G, Scierski W, Misiolek M, Urbaniec N, Lange D. Huge retropharyngeal lipoma causing obstructive sleep apnoea:A case report. Eur Arch otorhinolarngol. 2006;263(8):738–40. doi: 10.1007/s00405-006-0050-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Radhakrishna Pillai OS, Vijayalakshmi S, Adarsha TV, Thahir M, Gopinathan UK, Mohammed N. Retropharyngeal lipoma-a case report. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;59(4):360 –2. doi: 10.1007/s12070-007-0102-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chua DY, Lim MY, Teo DT, Hwang SY. Retropharyngeal lipoma with parapharyngeal extension: is transoral excision possible. Singapore Med J. 2013 Sep;54(9):e176–8. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2013178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Piccin O, Sorrenti G. Adult obstructive sleep apnea related to nasopharyngeal obstruction: a case of retropharyngeal lipoma and pathogenetic considerations. Sleep and Breathing. 2007 Dec;11(4):305–7. doi: 10.1007/s11325-007-0129-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Heaton CM, Ahmed SR, Ryan WR. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for excision of a retropharyngeal intramuscular lipoma. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017 Dec;44(6):742–4. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2016.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee HK, Hwang SB, Chung GH, Hong KH, Jang KY. Retropharyngeal spindle cell/pleomorphic lipoma. Korean Journal of Radiology. 2013 Jun;14(3):493–6. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.3.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jin SM, Lee DH, Lee JK, Lim SC. Retropharyngeal lipoma presenting with snoring in a child. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2018 Dec;47(12):1541–2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chrysovitsiotis G, Papanikolaou V, Kyrodimos E, Giotakis E. Symptomatic retropharyngeal space lipoma A patient with Madelung disease. Hippokratia. 2020 Apr;24(2) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Luczak K, Dorobisz K, Krecicki T, Janczak D, Chabowski M, Zatonski T. The lipomatosis of the parapharyngeal and retropharyngeal space: a case report. Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo. 2015;143(7-8):455–7. doi: 10.2298/sarh1508455l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ehlers SA, Bozanich JM, Arashlow MT, Liang H, Nair MK. Large airway-obstructing retropharyngeal lipoma in an asymptomatic patient: a case report. International Journal of Implant Dentistry. 2020 Dec;6(1):1–5. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00237-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Brown HH, Kersten RC, Kulwin DR. Lipomatous hamartoma of the orbit. Archives of ophthalmology. 1991 Feb;109(2):240–3. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080020086050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
