ABSTRACT
We report the circularized complete genome sequences, containing a circular chromosome and two circular plasmids, of strains SalSpp05 (4.9 Mbp) and SalSpp10 (4.8 Mbp), which were isolated from chicken carcass rinse water samples; the sequences were obtained by combining Oxford Nanopore Technologies long-read data and Illumina short-read data. Whole-genome alignments indicated that both strains belong to Salmonella enterica.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Salmonella spp. are important foodborne pathogens that are distributed worldwide and are associated with poultry infections (1). Recently, the distribution of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Salmonella strains obtained from chickens could cause disease in humans in Thailand with the risk of unsuccessful treatment (2). Contamination with Salmonella impacts the process from farm to fork in the food industry and is usually detected by either processing swab samples or obtaining several sample types, such as samples from feed, equipment, fomite, diseased chicks, and carcasses (3). Since Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis has predominantly infected poultry hosts and evolved through adaptation to different host environments, routine Salmonella monitoring programs on poultry farms would improve food safety.
Here, carcass rinse water samples collected from Klangkoi chicken farm in Thailand were screened for Salmonella as part of routine surveillance, by growth in buffered peptone water medium at 37°C for 24 h. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted by using ZymoBIOMICS DNA kits (Zymo Research, USA), and the quality of DNA was assessed using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The same gDNA was used for Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing. For short-read sequencing, a 100-bp paired-end library was constructed using the TruSeq Nano DNA kit and sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 system with the HiSeq Rapid SBS kit v2 (Illumina, USA). Long-read sequencing was performed using a rapid barcoding kit (SQK-RBK004; ONT, UK) and an R9.4.1 flow cell (FLO-MIN106) on a Nanopore MinION Mk1c system (ONT) in super accuracy mode, and data were demultiplexed using Guppy v5.0.7 (4). For the following stage, reads with read quality scores of ≥30 and 100-bp read lengths for Illumina sequencing and scores of ≥9 and 1,000-bp read lengths for ONT sequencing were used. After adapter trimming and quality checks with either Skewer v0.2.2 (5) or Porechop v0.2.4 (https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop), short reads (n = 8,984,838 reads [SalSpp05] or n = 5,869,998 reads [SalSpp10]) and long reads (n = 31,732 reads [average read length, 6,986.6 bases] [SalSpp05] or n = 34,848 reads [average read length, 6,355.2 bases] [SalSpp10]) were assembled using Unicycler v0.4.8 (6). The assembled genome was then checked for quality using QUAST v5.0.2 (7), and MOB-suite v3.0.3 was used for plasmid typing (8). Overall, the complete circular genomes of SalSpp05 (4,977,168 bp) and SalSpp10 (4,854,412 bp) contain one chromosome and two plasmids. Genome annotation was performed with the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v4.11 (9). All genome and plasmid features are summarized in Table 1. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) values for both genomes were calculated with GTDB-Tk v1.5.1 (10), which identified the strains as S. enterica on the basis of ~98% ANI with the reference genome (GenBank accession number AE006468.2). AMRFinderPlus v3.10.40 (11) predicted AMR genes in the aminoglycoside [aadA2 (99.6% identity) and aac(3)-IId (100% identity)], lincosamide [lnu(F) (100% identity)], and β-lactam (blaTEM-1 [100% identity]) classes in the plasmid of SalSpp10 (GenBank accession number CP104489).
TABLE 1.
Genome features of two S. enterica strains isolated from chicken carcass rinse water samples
| Genome feature | Data for strain: |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SalSpp05 |
SalSpp10 |
|||||
| Chromosome | Plasmid 1 | Plasmid 2 | Chromosome | Plasmid 1 | Plasmid 2 | |
| Size (bp) | 4,964,371 | 8,873 | 3,924 | 4,806,677 | 44,362 | 3,373 |
| Sequencing depth (×) | 44.72 | 207.39 | 100.84 | 163.30 | 431.75 | 250.24 |
| N50 (bp) | 4,964,371 | 4,806,677 | ||||
| GC content (%) | 52.23 | 53.15 | 47.66 | 52.21 | 43.70 | 55.10 |
| No. of CDSsa | 4,847 | 9 | 4 | 4,660 | 61 | 5 |
| No. of rRNAs | 22 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| No. of tRNAs | 86 | 0 | 0 | 82 | 0 | 0 |
| ANI (%) | 98.59 | 98.20 | ||||
| GenBank accession no. | CP104491 | CP104492 | CP104493 | CP104488 | CP104489 | CP104490 |
CDSs, coding sequences.
Data availability.
All complete circular genome sequences have been deposited in GenBank under the BioProject accession number PRJNA879268. The raw reads have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession numbers SRR21539850 and SRR21539849 (Illumina) and SRR21539845 and SRR21539844 (ONT) for strains SalSpp05 and SalSpp10, respectively.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was financially supported by CPF (Thailand) Public Company Ltd. (grants CP-RES003/2021 and CPFTH-RES005/2022).
We thank CPF Food Laboratories and Animal Health Diagnostic Center for support and summarization of the information to facilitate the study.
Contributor Information
Thidathip Wongsurawat, Email: thidathip.won@mahidol.edu.
Steven R. Gill, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry
REFERENCES
- 1.Bell RL, Jarvis KG, Ottesen AR, McFarland MA, Brown EW. 2016. Recent and emerging innovations in Salmonella detection: a food and environmental perspective. Microb Biotechnol 9:279–292. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kongsanan P, Angkititrakul S, Kiddee A, Tribuddharat C. 2021. Spread of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella from poultry to humans in Thailand. Jpn J Infect Dis 74:220–227. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2020.548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tabo D-a, Diguimbaye CD, Granier SA, Moury F, Brisabois A, Elgroud R, Millemann Y. 2013. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of non-typhoidal Salmonella serotypes isolated from laying hens and broiler chicken farms in N’Djamena, Chad. Vet Microbiol 166:293–298. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wick RR, Judd LM, Holt KE. 2019. Performance of neural network basecalling tools for Oxford Nanopore sequencing. Genome Biol 20:129. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1727-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jiang H, Lei R, Ding S-W, Zhu S. 2014. Skewer: a fast and accurate adapter trimmer for next-generation sequencing paired-end reads. BMC Bioinformatics 15:182. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Robertson J, Nash JHE. 2018. MOB-suite: software tools for clustering, reconstruction and typing of plasmids from draft assemblies. Microb Genom 4:e000206. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. 2019. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36:1925–1927. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Feldgarden M, Brover V, Haft DH, Prasad AB, Slotta DJ, Tolstoy I, Tyson GH, Zhao S, Hsu C-H, McDermott PF, Tadesse DA, Morales C, Simmons M, Tillman G, Wasilenko J, Folster JP, Klimke W. 2019. Validating the AMRFinder tool and resistance gene database by using antimicrobial resistance genotype-phenotype correlations in a collection of isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e00483-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00483-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All complete circular genome sequences have been deposited in GenBank under the BioProject accession number PRJNA879268. The raw reads have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession numbers SRR21539850 and SRR21539849 (Illumina) and SRR21539845 and SRR21539844 (ONT) for strains SalSpp05 and SalSpp10, respectively.
