Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2023 Jan 4;12(1):e01183-22. doi: 10.1128/mra.01183-22

Taxonomic Profiling of Microbes in Glyphosate-Treated Sediment Microcosms

Madison R Newman a, Darlenys Sanchez a, Anna M Acosta a, Bernadette J Connors a,
Editor: Irene L G Newtonb
PMCID: PMC9872619  PMID: 36598253

ABSTRACT

Here, we report the impact of glyphosate on bacterial populations in sediment microcosms, determined using 16S amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomics with source material from a suburban creek. The 16S amplicon and metagenomic data reveal that members of the genus Pseudomonas are increased by the treatment.

ANNOUNCEMENT

The herbicide N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine, known as glyphosate, is a nonspecific organophosphate herbicide used commonly to kill broadleaf weeds and grasses. Although commonly applied to foliage, measurable quantities of the herbicide have been detected in soil, groundwater, and surface waters (14). Several studies have shown that bacterial communities are altered because of glyphosate application (58).

Glyphosate microcosms were created with sediment from suburban creek. Sediments were exposed to various amounts of commercial herbicide (0.675% to 2.75% [vol/vol]) for 1 week. DNA was extracted from samples using the ZymoBIOMICS DNA/RNA miniprep kit. PCR was performed based on the Earth Microbiome Project’s 16S rRNA amplification protocol (9). The amplification products were pooled and gel purified on a 2% agarose gel using the Qiagen gel extraction kit. The purified library was quality checked using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and an Agilent high-sensitivity DNA kit. Sequencing was conducted by Wright Labs (Huntingdon, PA, USA) using Illumina MiSeq v2 chemistry with paired-end 250-bp reads. Forward and reverse demultiplexed paired-end reads were processed using QIIME2 v2021.2 (10). DADA2 (11) was used to generate amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), with the reads trimmed based on Phred quality scores of <15. Taxonomy was assigned using the Greengenes v13.8 database (12).

For shotgun metagenomics, libraries were constructed using the Nextera XT DNA library prep kit from Illumina. The quality of the libraries was determined as described previously. Sequences between 250 and 400 bp were selected via gel purification. The pool was then sequenced at UC Davis Genome Center (Davis, CA, USA), using an Illumina HiSeq 4000 instrument to produce 2 × 150-bp reads. FastQC (13) was used to check the raw data, which were then filtered using fastp (14). Sequences identified as belonging to Homo sapiens were removed using KneadData2 (15). The microbial and functional features of the samples were determined by annotating the paired sequence data using HUMAnN3 (16). RPK (reads assigned per kilobase) normalization was performed using HUMAnN3 during the annotation process. The UniRef90 genes from the functional annotation were mapped to KEGG orthologs (17). Descriptions of all sequencing characteristics are provided in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics and SRA accession numbers of sequences obtained from glyphosate and control sediment samples

Sample name SRA accession no. Treatment with glyphosate (%) Sequence typea No. of reads Relative abundance of Pseudomonas (%)b
PiermontMarshUnt2M SRR22193479 Untreated 16S 34,332 0.053
PiermontMarshUnt2A SRR22193478 Untreated 16S 45,703 0.074
PiermontMarshLoM SRR22193477 0.675 16S 40,981 0.64
PiermontMarshLoA SRR22193476 0.675 16S 40,270 0.15
PiermontMarshMedM SRR22193475 1.375 16S 36,432 2.00
PiermontMarshMedA SRR22193474 1.375 16S 48,113 1.74
PiermontMarshHiM SRR22193472 2.75 16S 50,141 9.28
PiermontMarshHiA SRR22193471 2.75 16S 11,969 1.36
TappanUnt2M SRR22193458 Untreated 16S 66,301 0.026
TappanUnt2A SRR22193457 Untreated 16S 62,317 1.36
TappanLoM SRR22193494 0.675 16S 92,765 4.83
TappanLoA SRR22193493 0.675 16S 43,101 2.53
TappanMedM SRR22193492 1.375 16S 67,067 6.57
TappanMedA SRR22193491 1.375 16S 11,665 16.21
TappanHiM SRR22193490 2.75 16S 20,293 3.79
TappanHiA SRR22193489 2.75 16S 18,029 12.72
RockleighUnt2M SRR22193488 Untreated 16S 39,542 0.11
RockleighUnt2A SRR22193487 Untreated 16S 43,365 0
RockleighLoM SRR22193486 0.675 16S 31,783 0.072
RockleighLoA SRR22193485 0.675 16S 21,324 0.77
RockleighMedM SRR22193483 1.375 16S 31,095 1.96
RockleighMedA SRR22193482 1.375 16S 21,414 0.57
RockleighHiM SRR22193481 2.75 16S 34,743 0.19
RockleighHiA SRR22193480 2.75 16S 29,505 0.33
MoturisUnt2M SRR22193496 Untreated 16S 48,809 6.215
MoturisUnt2A SRR22193495 Untreated 16S 69,827 0.12
MoturisLoM SRR22193484 0.675 16S 70,491 0.72
MoturisLoA SRR22193473 0.675 16S 72,277 0.77
MoturisMedM SRR22193462 1.375 16S 76,593 5.44
MoturisMedA SRR22193461 1.375 16S 3 NA
MoturisHiM SRR22193460 2.75 16S 105,557 51.5
MoturisHiA SRR22193459 2.75 16S 69,569 4.16
SparkillUnt2M SRR22193470 Untreated 16S 45,738 1.13
SparkillUnt2A SRR22193469 Untreated 16S 39,689 0.12
SparkillLoM SRR22193468 0.675 16S 27,811 0.11
SparkillLoA SRR22193467 0.675 16S 13,643 2.16
SparkillMedM SRR22193466 1.375 16S 37,711 0.81
SparkillMedA SRR22193465 1.375 16S 65,204 4.95
SparkillHiM SRR22193464 2.75 16S 43,978 1.44
SparkillHiA SRR22193463 2.75 16S 22,753 2.15
Marsh control SRR22197666 Untreated MG 32,790,391 0
Marsh treated SRR22197661 2.75 MG 35,335,201 86.2
Tappan control SRR22197668 Untreated MG 34,107,107 0
Tappan treated SRR22197663 2.75 MG 36,162,594 40.5
Rockleigh control SRR22197667 Untreated MG 30,620,071 0
Rockleigh treated SRR22197662 2.75 MG 40,353,809 1.09
Moturis control SRR22197669 Untreated MG 36,371,761 0
Moturis treated SRR22197664 2.75 MG 50,053,512 56.2
Sparkill control SRR22197665 Untreated MG 26,080,480 0
Sparkill treated SRR22197660 2.75 MG 36,329,037 33.5
a

MG, metagenomic.

b

NA, not applicable.

Our results revealed that the relative abundance of Pseudomonas increased with glyphosate treatment, regardless of the sample source (Table 1). Through metagenomic analyses, we were able to determine that the Pseudomonas putida group represented the majority of the pseudomonads in the treated samples (16.2% [Tappan], 81% [Marsh], 51% [Moturis], 0.81% [Rockleigh], and 33.5% [Sparkill]). This is in contrast to the relative abundances across all sites and treatments for Enterobacter spp. (2.33% to 3.98%), Aeromonas spp. (23.5% to 27.1%), or unclassified sequences (3.21% to 5.12%), which remained comparatively constant. Pseudomonas spp. primarily mapped to the xenobiotic metabolism KEGG pathway in samples treated with glyphosate (56.1% [Tappan], 94.9% [Marsh], 64.8% [Moturis], 2.5% [Rockleigh], and 37.5% [Sparkill]), whereas the unclassified sequences primarily mapped to this KEGG pathway in untreated samples across all samples and sites.

Understanding these changes can help us develop genetic markers that may reveal glyphosate contamination without the need to detect and quantify glyphosate itself, a laborious procedure that is both costly and requires specialized equipment (18).

Data availability.

The raw sequencing data are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA898361. The SRA accession numbers are listed in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation OPUS MCS program (award number 1950018 to B.J.C.).

Contributor Information

Bernadette J. Connors, Email: bernadette.connors@duny.edu.

Irene L. G. Newton, Indiana University, Bloomington

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ghaderitabar H, Mousavi A, Salmanian AH, Hadi F. 2020. Novel aroA of glyphosate-tolerant bacterium Pseudomonas sp. strain HA-09 isolated from Roundup-contaminated garden soils in Iran. Iran J Biotechnol 18:e2597. doi: 10.30498/IJB.2020.204133.2597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rendón-von Osten J, Dzul-Caamal R. 2017. Glyphosate residues in groundwater, drinking water and urine of subsistence farmers from intensive agriculture localities: a survey in Hopelchén, Campeche, Mexico. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:595. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Van Stempvoort DR, Spoelstra J, Senger ND, Brown SJ, Post R, Struger J. 2016. Glyphosate residues in rural groundwater, Nottawasaga River watershed, Ontario, Canada. Pest Manag Sci 72:1862–1872. doi: 10.1002/ps.4218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lutri VF, Matteoda E, Blarasin M, Aparicio V, Giacobone D, Maldonado L, Quinodoz FB, Cabrera A, Albo JG. 2020. Hydrogeological features affecting spatial distribution of glyphosate and AMPA in groundwater and surface water in an agroecosystem. Córdoba, Argentina. Sci Total Environ 711:134557. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Newman MM, Hoilett N, Lorenz N, Dick RP, Liles MR, Ramsier C, Kloepper JW. 2016. Glyphosate effects on soil rhizosphere-associated bacterial communities. Sci Total Environ 543:155–160. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Motta EV, Raymann K, Moran NA. 2018. Glyphosate perturbs the gut microbiota of honey bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:10305–10310. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803880115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mesnage R, Antoniou MN. 2020. Computational modelling provides insight into the effects of glyphosate on the shikimate pathway in the human gut microbiome. Curr Res Toxicol 1:25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.crtox.2020.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Van Bruggen AHC, Finckh MR, He M, Ritsema CJ, Harkes P, Knuth D, Geissen V. 2021. Indirect effects of the herbicide glyphosate on plant, animal and human health through its effects on microbial communities. Front Environ Sci 9:464. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.763917. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Caporaso JG, Ackermann G, Apprill A, Bauer M, Berg-Lyons D, Betley J, Fierer N, Fraser L, Fuhrman JA, Gilbert JA, Gormley N. 2018. EMP 16S Illumina amplicon protocol. http://www.earthmicrobiome.org/protocols-and-standards/16s. Accessed 1 November 2022.
  • 10.Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, Bai Y, Bisanz JE, Bittinger K, Brejnrod A, Brislawn CJ, Brown CT, Callahan BJ, Caraballo-Rodríguez AM, Chase J, Cope EK, Da Silva R, Diener C, Dorrestein PC, Douglas GM, Durall DM, Duvallet C, Edwardson CF, Ernst M, Estaki M, Fouquier J, Gauglitz JM, Gibbons SM, Gibson DL, Gonzalez A, Gorlick K, Guo J, Hillmann B, Holmes S, Holste H, Huttenhower C, Huttley GA, Janssen S, Jarmusch AK, Jiang L, Kaehler BD, Kang KB, Keefe CR, Keim P, Kelley ST, Knights D, et al. 2019. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37:852–857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.McDonald D, Price MN, Goodrich J, Nawrocki EP, DeSantis TZ, Probst A, Andersen GL, Knight R, Hugenholtz P. 2012. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J 6:610–618. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data.
  • 14.Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huttenhower Lab. 2016. KneadData (version 0.5.4). Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health. http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/kneaddata. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Beghini F, McIver LJ, Blanco-Míguez A, Dubois L, Asnicar F, Maharjan S, Mailyan A, Manghi P, Scholz M, Thomas AM, Valles-Colomer M, Weingart G, Zhang Y, Zolfo M, Huttenhower C, Franzosa EA, Segata N. 2021. Integrating taxonomic, functional, and strain-level profiling of diverse microbial communities with bioBakery 3. Elife 10:e65088. doi: 10.7554/eLife.65088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Nakaya A. 2002. The KEGG databases at GenomeNet. Nucleic Acids Res 30:42–46. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang K, Geng Y, Dong Z, Pan X, Wu X, Xu J, Gao H, Dong F, Zheng Y. 2022. Simultaneous determination of glyphosate, glufosinate ammonium and their metabolites in maize and soybean by ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Methods 14:3850–3858. doi: 10.1039/d2ay01298g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The raw sequencing data are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA898361. The SRA accession numbers are listed in Table 1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES