ABSTRACT
Here, we report the impact of glyphosate on bacterial populations in sediment microcosms, determined using 16S amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomics with source material from a suburban creek. The 16S amplicon and metagenomic data reveal that members of the genus Pseudomonas are increased by the treatment.
ANNOUNCEMENT
The herbicide N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine, known as glyphosate, is a nonspecific organophosphate herbicide used commonly to kill broadleaf weeds and grasses. Although commonly applied to foliage, measurable quantities of the herbicide have been detected in soil, groundwater, and surface waters (1–4). Several studies have shown that bacterial communities are altered because of glyphosate application (5–8).
Glyphosate microcosms were created with sediment from suburban creek. Sediments were exposed to various amounts of commercial herbicide (0.675% to 2.75% [vol/vol]) for 1 week. DNA was extracted from samples using the ZymoBIOMICS DNA/RNA miniprep kit. PCR was performed based on the Earth Microbiome Project’s 16S rRNA amplification protocol (9). The amplification products were pooled and gel purified on a 2% agarose gel using the Qiagen gel extraction kit. The purified library was quality checked using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and an Agilent high-sensitivity DNA kit. Sequencing was conducted by Wright Labs (Huntingdon, PA, USA) using Illumina MiSeq v2 chemistry with paired-end 250-bp reads. Forward and reverse demultiplexed paired-end reads were processed using QIIME2 v2021.2 (10). DADA2 (11) was used to generate amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), with the reads trimmed based on Phred quality scores of <15. Taxonomy was assigned using the Greengenes v13.8 database (12).
For shotgun metagenomics, libraries were constructed using the Nextera XT DNA library prep kit from Illumina. The quality of the libraries was determined as described previously. Sequences between 250 and 400 bp were selected via gel purification. The pool was then sequenced at UC Davis Genome Center (Davis, CA, USA), using an Illumina HiSeq 4000 instrument to produce 2 × 150-bp reads. FastQC (13) was used to check the raw data, which were then filtered using fastp (14). Sequences identified as belonging to Homo sapiens were removed using KneadData2 (15). The microbial and functional features of the samples were determined by annotating the paired sequence data using HUMAnN3 (16). RPK (reads assigned per kilobase) normalization was performed using HUMAnN3 during the annotation process. The UniRef90 genes from the functional annotation were mapped to KEGG orthologs (17). Descriptions of all sequencing characteristics are provided in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Characteristics and SRA accession numbers of sequences obtained from glyphosate and control sediment samples
| Sample name | SRA accession no. | Treatment with glyphosate (%) | Sequence typea | No. of reads | Relative abundance of Pseudomonas (%)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PiermontMarshUnt2M | SRR22193479 | Untreated | 16S | 34,332 | 0.053 |
| PiermontMarshUnt2A | SRR22193478 | Untreated | 16S | 45,703 | 0.074 |
| PiermontMarshLoM | SRR22193477 | 0.675 | 16S | 40,981 | 0.64 |
| PiermontMarshLoA | SRR22193476 | 0.675 | 16S | 40,270 | 0.15 |
| PiermontMarshMedM | SRR22193475 | 1.375 | 16S | 36,432 | 2.00 |
| PiermontMarshMedA | SRR22193474 | 1.375 | 16S | 48,113 | 1.74 |
| PiermontMarshHiM | SRR22193472 | 2.75 | 16S | 50,141 | 9.28 |
| PiermontMarshHiA | SRR22193471 | 2.75 | 16S | 11,969 | 1.36 |
| TappanUnt2M | SRR22193458 | Untreated | 16S | 66,301 | 0.026 |
| TappanUnt2A | SRR22193457 | Untreated | 16S | 62,317 | 1.36 |
| TappanLoM | SRR22193494 | 0.675 | 16S | 92,765 | 4.83 |
| TappanLoA | SRR22193493 | 0.675 | 16S | 43,101 | 2.53 |
| TappanMedM | SRR22193492 | 1.375 | 16S | 67,067 | 6.57 |
| TappanMedA | SRR22193491 | 1.375 | 16S | 11,665 | 16.21 |
| TappanHiM | SRR22193490 | 2.75 | 16S | 20,293 | 3.79 |
| TappanHiA | SRR22193489 | 2.75 | 16S | 18,029 | 12.72 |
| RockleighUnt2M | SRR22193488 | Untreated | 16S | 39,542 | 0.11 |
| RockleighUnt2A | SRR22193487 | Untreated | 16S | 43,365 | 0 |
| RockleighLoM | SRR22193486 | 0.675 | 16S | 31,783 | 0.072 |
| RockleighLoA | SRR22193485 | 0.675 | 16S | 21,324 | 0.77 |
| RockleighMedM | SRR22193483 | 1.375 | 16S | 31,095 | 1.96 |
| RockleighMedA | SRR22193482 | 1.375 | 16S | 21,414 | 0.57 |
| RockleighHiM | SRR22193481 | 2.75 | 16S | 34,743 | 0.19 |
| RockleighHiA | SRR22193480 | 2.75 | 16S | 29,505 | 0.33 |
| MoturisUnt2M | SRR22193496 | Untreated | 16S | 48,809 | 6.215 |
| MoturisUnt2A | SRR22193495 | Untreated | 16S | 69,827 | 0.12 |
| MoturisLoM | SRR22193484 | 0.675 | 16S | 70,491 | 0.72 |
| MoturisLoA | SRR22193473 | 0.675 | 16S | 72,277 | 0.77 |
| MoturisMedM | SRR22193462 | 1.375 | 16S | 76,593 | 5.44 |
| MoturisMedA | SRR22193461 | 1.375 | 16S | 3 | NA |
| MoturisHiM | SRR22193460 | 2.75 | 16S | 105,557 | 51.5 |
| MoturisHiA | SRR22193459 | 2.75 | 16S | 69,569 | 4.16 |
| SparkillUnt2M | SRR22193470 | Untreated | 16S | 45,738 | 1.13 |
| SparkillUnt2A | SRR22193469 | Untreated | 16S | 39,689 | 0.12 |
| SparkillLoM | SRR22193468 | 0.675 | 16S | 27,811 | 0.11 |
| SparkillLoA | SRR22193467 | 0.675 | 16S | 13,643 | 2.16 |
| SparkillMedM | SRR22193466 | 1.375 | 16S | 37,711 | 0.81 |
| SparkillMedA | SRR22193465 | 1.375 | 16S | 65,204 | 4.95 |
| SparkillHiM | SRR22193464 | 2.75 | 16S | 43,978 | 1.44 |
| SparkillHiA | SRR22193463 | 2.75 | 16S | 22,753 | 2.15 |
| Marsh control | SRR22197666 | Untreated | MG | 32,790,391 | 0 |
| Marsh treated | SRR22197661 | 2.75 | MG | 35,335,201 | 86.2 |
| Tappan control | SRR22197668 | Untreated | MG | 34,107,107 | 0 |
| Tappan treated | SRR22197663 | 2.75 | MG | 36,162,594 | 40.5 |
| Rockleigh control | SRR22197667 | Untreated | MG | 30,620,071 | 0 |
| Rockleigh treated | SRR22197662 | 2.75 | MG | 40,353,809 | 1.09 |
| Moturis control | SRR22197669 | Untreated | MG | 36,371,761 | 0 |
| Moturis treated | SRR22197664 | 2.75 | MG | 50,053,512 | 56.2 |
| Sparkill control | SRR22197665 | Untreated | MG | 26,080,480 | 0 |
| Sparkill treated | SRR22197660 | 2.75 | MG | 36,329,037 | 33.5 |
MG, metagenomic.
NA, not applicable.
Our results revealed that the relative abundance of Pseudomonas increased with glyphosate treatment, regardless of the sample source (Table 1). Through metagenomic analyses, we were able to determine that the Pseudomonas putida group represented the majority of the pseudomonads in the treated samples (16.2% [Tappan], 81% [Marsh], 51% [Moturis], 0.81% [Rockleigh], and 33.5% [Sparkill]). This is in contrast to the relative abundances across all sites and treatments for Enterobacter spp. (2.33% to 3.98%), Aeromonas spp. (23.5% to 27.1%), or unclassified sequences (3.21% to 5.12%), which remained comparatively constant. Pseudomonas spp. primarily mapped to the xenobiotic metabolism KEGG pathway in samples treated with glyphosate (56.1% [Tappan], 94.9% [Marsh], 64.8% [Moturis], 2.5% [Rockleigh], and 37.5% [Sparkill]), whereas the unclassified sequences primarily mapped to this KEGG pathway in untreated samples across all samples and sites.
Understanding these changes can help us develop genetic markers that may reveal glyphosate contamination without the need to detect and quantify glyphosate itself, a laborious procedure that is both costly and requires specialized equipment (18).
Data availability.
The raw sequencing data are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA898361. The SRA accession numbers are listed in Table 1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation OPUS MCS program (award number 1950018 to B.J.C.).
Contributor Information
Bernadette J. Connors, Email: bernadette.connors@duny.edu.
Irene L. G. Newton, Indiana University, Bloomington
REFERENCES
- 1.Ghaderitabar H, Mousavi A, Salmanian AH, Hadi F. 2020. Novel aroA of glyphosate-tolerant bacterium Pseudomonas sp. strain HA-09 isolated from Roundup-contaminated garden soils in Iran. Iran J Biotechnol 18:e2597. doi: 10.30498/IJB.2020.204133.2597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rendón-von Osten J, Dzul-Caamal R. 2017. Glyphosate residues in groundwater, drinking water and urine of subsistence farmers from intensive agriculture localities: a survey in Hopelchén, Campeche, Mexico. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:595. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Van Stempvoort DR, Spoelstra J, Senger ND, Brown SJ, Post R, Struger J. 2016. Glyphosate residues in rural groundwater, Nottawasaga River watershed, Ontario, Canada. Pest Manag Sci 72:1862–1872. doi: 10.1002/ps.4218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lutri VF, Matteoda E, Blarasin M, Aparicio V, Giacobone D, Maldonado L, Quinodoz FB, Cabrera A, Albo JG. 2020. Hydrogeological features affecting spatial distribution of glyphosate and AMPA in groundwater and surface water in an agroecosystem. Córdoba, Argentina. Sci Total Environ 711:134557. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Newman MM, Hoilett N, Lorenz N, Dick RP, Liles MR, Ramsier C, Kloepper JW. 2016. Glyphosate effects on soil rhizosphere-associated bacterial communities. Sci Total Environ 543:155–160. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Motta EV, Raymann K, Moran NA. 2018. Glyphosate perturbs the gut microbiota of honey bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:10305–10310. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803880115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mesnage R, Antoniou MN. 2020. Computational modelling provides insight into the effects of glyphosate on the shikimate pathway in the human gut microbiome. Curr Res Toxicol 1:25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.crtox.2020.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Van Bruggen AHC, Finckh MR, He M, Ritsema CJ, Harkes P, Knuth D, Geissen V. 2021. Indirect effects of the herbicide glyphosate on plant, animal and human health through its effects on microbial communities. Front Environ Sci 9:464. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.763917. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Caporaso JG, Ackermann G, Apprill A, Bauer M, Berg-Lyons D, Betley J, Fierer N, Fraser L, Fuhrman JA, Gilbert JA, Gormley N. 2018. EMP 16S Illumina amplicon protocol. http://www.earthmicrobiome.org/protocols-and-standards/16s. Accessed 1 November 2022.
- 10.Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, Bai Y, Bisanz JE, Bittinger K, Brejnrod A, Brislawn CJ, Brown CT, Callahan BJ, Caraballo-Rodríguez AM, Chase J, Cope EK, Da Silva R, Diener C, Dorrestein PC, Douglas GM, Durall DM, Duvallet C, Edwardson CF, Ernst M, Estaki M, Fouquier J, Gauglitz JM, Gibbons SM, Gibson DL, Gonzalez A, Gorlick K, Guo J, Hillmann B, Holmes S, Holste H, Huttenhower C, Huttley GA, Janssen S, Jarmusch AK, Jiang L, Kaehler BD, Kang KB, Keefe CR, Keim P, Kelley ST, Knights D, et al. 2019. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37:852–857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McDonald D, Price MN, Goodrich J, Nawrocki EP, DeSantis TZ, Probst A, Andersen GL, Knight R, Hugenholtz P. 2012. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J 6:610–618. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data.
- 14.Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huttenhower Lab. 2016. KneadData (version 0.5.4). Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health. http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/kneaddata. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Beghini F, McIver LJ, Blanco-Míguez A, Dubois L, Asnicar F, Maharjan S, Mailyan A, Manghi P, Scholz M, Thomas AM, Valles-Colomer M, Weingart G, Zhang Y, Zolfo M, Huttenhower C, Franzosa EA, Segata N. 2021. Integrating taxonomic, functional, and strain-level profiling of diverse microbial communities with bioBakery 3. Elife 10:e65088. doi: 10.7554/eLife.65088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Nakaya A. 2002. The KEGG databases at GenomeNet. Nucleic Acids Res 30:42–46. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang K, Geng Y, Dong Z, Pan X, Wu X, Xu J, Gao H, Dong F, Zheng Y. 2022. Simultaneous determination of glyphosate, glufosinate ammonium and their metabolites in maize and soybean by ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Methods 14:3850–3858. doi: 10.1039/d2ay01298g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The raw sequencing data are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA898361. The SRA accession numbers are listed in Table 1.
