ABSTRACT
Aeromonas hydrophila is a Gram-negative pathogen that is associated with motile aeromonad septicemia in various fish species. Here, we report the complete genomic sequences of two A. hydrophila isolates derived from diseased fish in South Korea.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Aeromonas hydrophila is an opportunistic pathogen in a variety of animals, including humans (1, 2) and is the causative agent of motile aeromonad septicemia in different fish species worldwide (3, 4). Here, we report the complete genomic sequences of strains AC133 and AC185, isolated by swabbing the internal section of a kidney obtained aseptically from hemorrhagic and/or exophthalmic crucian carp (Carassius carassius) and American eel (Anguilla rostrata), respectively, which were collected from fish farms in South Korea. The isolates were inoculated onto tryptic soy agar (TSA) (Oxoid, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and incubated at 28°C for 24 h. Colonies identified as A. hydrophila by species-specific multiplex PCR targeting the gyrB and 16S rRNA genes as described previously (5) were stored in brain heart infusion broth (BHIB) (Merk, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with 15% glycerol at −80°C.
A single colony of each A. hydrophila strain grown on TSA was inoculated into BHIB and incubated at 28°C for 24 h. Genomic DNA was extracted using the Wizard DNA purification kit (Promega, USA) and quantified using a Qubit v3.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Whole-genome sequencing was performed using an RS II instrument (Pacific Biosciences [PacBio], USA). Library preparation was constructed using the PacBio DNA template prep kit 1.0 and BluePippin size-selection system according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The reads were filtered (minimum subread length, 500 bp; minimum polymerase read quality, 0.80) and de novo assembled using PacBio single-molecule real-time analysis 2.3.0 based on the HGAP2 protocol (Pacific Biosciences). Gene prediction was conducted using tRNAscan-SE (6) for tRNA search, Rfam (7) for rRNA and noncoding RNA search, and Prodigal (8) for coding sequence (CDS) search. The predicted genes were functionally annotated by homology search against the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (9), SEED (10), Swiss-Prot (11), and eggNOG (12) databases. Default settings were used for all software.
The sequencing and annotation results are summarized in Table 1. A circular chromosome was confirmed by Unicycler v0.4.9 (13) and rotated to dnaA as the start position. No plasmid was found in both isolates. The genome of AC133 and AC185 consisted of 5,037,528 and 4,963,702 bases with an overall G+C content of 60.9% and 61.3%, containing 4,475 and 4,400 CDSs, 125 and 126 tRNAs, and 31 and 31 rRNA genes, respectively. Strains AC133 and AC185 showed 96.8% and 97.04% average nucleotide identity analysis with type strain A. hydrophila ATCC 7966 (GenBank CP000462.1), respectively, using Edgar 3.0 (14). Various virulence-related genes, including those responsible for type IV pili, type II, and type VI secretion systems (15–17), were identified, based on the Virulence Factor Database (18). A BLAST search using the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (19) (≥95% identity) revealed that both isolates harbor one antibiotic resistance-related gene (ARG), blaOXA-726, while additional multiple ARGs, namely, blaTEM-1, blaCTX-M-3, cepS, catII, mphA, sul1, aadA2, aac(3)-IId, aac(6')-Ib10, aph(6)-Id, aph(3'')-Ib, aph(3')-Ia, and tet(D), were identified only in strain AC185. Both AC133 and AC185 exhibited no inhibition zones relative to ampicillin and amoxicillin, and AC185 was also resistant to cefoperazone, cefotetan, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, gentamicin, and oxytetracycline using disk diffusion assays based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (20). These data were in a close agreement with the genotypic differences between the strains. The genome sequences presented here could improve understanding about the virulence and antibiotic resistance of A. hydrophila.
TABLE 1.
Summary of genome data of the isolates
| Strain | No. of reads | Coverage (×)a | N50 value (bp) | No. of contigs | Total length (bp) | G+C content (%) | No. of protein-coding genes | No. of rRNAs | No. of tRNAs | No. of plasmids |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC133 | 158,140 | 310 | 14,458 | 1 | 5,037,528 | 60.9 | 4,475 | 31 | 125 | 0 |
| AC185 | 106,152 | 242 | 17,464 | 1 | 4,963,702 | 61.3 | 4,400 | 31 | 126 | 0 |
Rounded to the nearest whole number.
Data availability.
Raw sequences of A. hydrophila AC133 and AC185 were submitted to NCBI SRA with accession numbers SRR20950404 and SRR20950142, respectively; under BioProject number PRJNA812366; and under BioSample numbers SAMN26377313 and SAMN26377314, respectively. The complete sequences of A. hydrophila AC133 and AC185 were deposited in NCBI GenBank database under accession numbers CP093309 and CP093308, respectively.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2021R1F1A1062251).
Contributor Information
Do-Hyung Kim, Email: dhkim@pknu.ac.kr.
Frank J. Stewart, Montana State University
REFERENCES
- 1.Tomás JM. 2012. The main Aeromonas pathogenic factors. Int Sch Res Not 2012:256261. doi: 10.5402/2012/256261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Janda JM. 1991. Recent advances in the study of the taxonomy, pathogenicity, and infectious syndromes associated with the genus Aeromonas. Clin Microbiol Rev 4:397–410. doi: 10.1128/CMR.4.4.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nielsen ME, Høi L, Schmidt AS, Qian D, Shimada T, Shen JY, Larsen JL. 2001. Is Aeromonas hydrophila the dominant motile Aeromonas species that causes disease outbreaks in aquaculture production in the Zhejiang Province of China? Dis Aquat Organ 46:23–29. doi: 10.3354/dao046023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhang X, Yang W, Wu H, Gong X, Li A. 2014. Multilocus sequence typing revealed a clonal lineage of Aeromonas hydrophila caused motile Aeromonas septicemia outbreaks in pond-cultured cyprinid fish in an epidemic area in central China. Aquaculture 432:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.04.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Persson S, Al-Shuweli S, Yapici S, Jensen JN, Olsen KEP. 2015. Identification of clinical aeromonas species by rpoB and gyrB sequencing and development of a multiplex PCR method for detection of Aeromonas hydrophila, A. caviae, A. veronii, and A. media. J Clin Microbiol 53:653–656. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01963-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schattner P, Brooks AN, Lowe TM. 2005. The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W686–W689. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Griffiths-Jones S, Moxon S, Marshall M, Khanna A, Eddy SR, Bateman A. 2005. Rfam: annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D121–D124. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hyatt D, Chen G-L, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kanehisa M, Goto S. 2000. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28:27–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Boeckmann B, Bairoch A, Apweiler R, Blatter M-C, Estreicher A, Gasteiger E, Martin MJ, Michoud K, O'Donovan C, Phan I, Pilbout S, Schneider M. 2003. The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res 31:365–370. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jensen LJ, Julien P, Kuhn M, von Mering C, Muller J, Doerks T, Bork P. 2008. eggNOG: automated construction and annotation of orthologous groups of genes. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D250–D254. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dieckmann MA, Beyvers S, Nkouamedjo-Fankep RC, Hanel PHG, Jelonek L, Blom J, Goesmann A. 2021. EDGAR3. 0: comparative genomics and phylogenomics on a scalable infrastructure. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W185–W192. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Persat A, Inclan YF, Engel JN, Stone HA, Gitai Z. 2015. Type IV pili mechanochemically regulate virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:7563–7568. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502025112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barger PC, Liles MR, Newton JC. 2020. Type II secretion is essential for virulence of the emerging fish pathogen, hypervirulent Aeromonas hydrophila. Front Vet Sci 7:574113. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.574113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rasmussen-Ivey CR, Figueras MJ, McGarey D, Liles MR. 2016. Virulence factors of Aeromonas hydrophila: in the wake of reclassification. Front Microbiol 7:1337. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu B, Zheng D, Jin Q, Chen L, Yang J. 2019. VFDB 2019: a comparative pathogenomic platform with an interactive Web interface. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D687–D692. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jia B, Raphenya AR, Alcock B, Waglechner N, Guo P, Tsang KK, Lago BA, Dave BM, Pereira S, Sharma AN, Doshi S, Courtot M, Lo R, Williams LE, Frye JG, Elsayegh T, Sardar D, Westman EL, Pawlowski AC, Johnson TA, Brinkman FS, Wright GD, McArthur AG. 2017. CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D566–D573. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hawke JP, Reimschuessel R, Aoki T, Bell TA, Blanc G, Carson J, Dixon B, Miller RA, Olivier G, Shryock TR, Smith PR, Thornsberry C, Walker RD, Watts JL, Wu CC. 2006. Methods for antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing of bacteria isolated from aquatic animals: approved guideline. First edition. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Raw sequences of A. hydrophila AC133 and AC185 were submitted to NCBI SRA with accession numbers SRR20950404 and SRR20950142, respectively; under BioProject number PRJNA812366; and under BioSample numbers SAMN26377313 and SAMN26377314, respectively. The complete sequences of A. hydrophila AC133 and AC185 were deposited in NCBI GenBank database under accession numbers CP093309 and CP093308, respectively.
