ABSTRACT
Enterococcus dispar was isolated for the first time from synovial fluid and stool cultures and described as a new species in 1991. Here, we report the genome of E. dispar CoE-457-22, which was obtained from traditionally produced Montenegrin dry sausage (sudzuk).
ANNOUNCEMENT
Limited information is available about Enterococcus dispar. Similar to other enterococci, E. dispar has been isolated from the environment (1, 2), animals (3), food (4), and clinical samples (5–8). Genomic analysis of strain CoE-457-22, which was isolated from Montenegrin dry sausage, may provide useful information on environmental adaptation, safety aspects (9), and contributions to the typicity of traditional food products (10).
Sample enrichment and isolation of bacterial strains from traditional Montenegrin dry sausage (sudzuk) were performed using de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) agar (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Oxoid Deutschland) according to the ISO 15214:1998 method (11). Colonies that were morphologically suspected to be lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were subcultured on MRS agar for species identification by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Microflex LT/SH system with the MBT Compass IVD 4.1.100 module; Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS).
Genomic DNA was isolated from overnight cultures grown on blood agar at 37°C using the MagAttract high-molecular-weight (HMW) DNA kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Libraries were prepared using a DNA preparation (M) kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), and 2 × 150-bp sequencing was performed on a NextSeq 2000 instrument (Illumina, Inc.) as described previously (12). A long-read sequencing library was prepared using the rapid barcoding sequencing kit (SQK-RBK004; Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) and sequenced with a FLO-MIN106D R9.4.1 SpotON flow cell on a MinION Mk1C device, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A total of 6,841 Nanopore reads, with an N50 value of 5,883 bp, were obtained using guppy v6.1.5 in fast base-calling mode and filtered using Filtlong v0.2.1 with the following parameters: min_length, 1000; keep_percent, 90; target_bases, 500000000. A total of 5,349,760 Illumina reads were quality controlled using FastQC v0.11.9 and used untrimmed in the final hybrid assembly using Unicycler v0.5.0, which resulted in 6 contigs with a mean coverage of 287-fold, an N50 value of 2,293,182 bp, a genome size of 2.7 Mb, and a GC content of 37.2% (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Characteristics of Enterococcus dispar CoE-457-22
| Attribute | Finding |
|---|---|
| Assembly size (bp) | 2,662,631 |
| Avg contig length (bp) | 443,771 |
| No. of contigs | 6 |
| N50 (bp) | 2,293,182 |
| GC content (%) | 37.2 |
| Genome coverage (×) | 287 |
| Total no. of genes | 2,604 |
| Total no. of coding sequences | 2,537 |
| No. of RNA genes | 67 |
| No. of noncoding RNA genes | 4 |
| No. of tRNAs | 60 |
| No. of CRISPR/Cas elements | 1 |
| Pathogenic families | Hypothetical protein (GenBank accession no. BAF77294, BAF77275, and BAF77283), transmembrane amino acid transporter protein (GenBank accession no. CBJ22574), conserved hypothetical protein (GenBank accession no. CBJ22562, CBJ22569, CBJ22565, and CBJ22571), small subunit ribosomal protein S19P (GenBank accession no. ABP89047), 30S ribosomal protein S21 (GenBank accession no. ABP90399), polyribonucleotide nucleotidyltransferase (GenBank accession no. CBJ22582), and ribosomal protein L29 (GenBank accession no. AA080083) |
The Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) and tools from the Center for Genomic Epidemiology (http://www.genomicepidemiology.org) were used for detection of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), virulence genes (VGs), plasmids, and pathogen families. BAGEL4 (13) and antiSMASH v6.0 (14) were used to detect genes for the synthesis of secondary metabolites and aromatic compounds. Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified. Vancomycin and tetracycline susceptibility testing was performed using Etest strips (bioMérieux, Vienna, Austria).
The NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (15) identified 2,604 genes, 2,537 coding sequences, 19 pseudogenes, and 67 RNA genes (Table 1). Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (16) analysis revealed 99.56% similarity of the 16S rRNA genes between CoE-457-22 and E. dispar ATCC 21566. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) (formula d4) (https://tygs.dsmz.de) and average nucleotide identity (ANI) (17) analyses revealed values of 94.8% and 98.99%, respectively, for similarity between CoE-457-22 and E. dispar ATCC 51266.
CoE-457-22 carried the ARGs tetM, vanY, and vanT and was sensitive to vancomycin and resistant to tetracycline. Plasmids, VGs, bacteriocin genes, and secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters were not detected. PathogenFinder identified 12 pathogenic families (18) (Table 1).
Data availability.
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under BioProject accession number PRJNA882413 and BioSample accession number SAMN30933858. This is the first version of this genome. The raw sequence reads have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession numbers SRR21656176 and SRR22245459.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The research was funded through a grant from the Ministry of Science and Technological Development of Montenegro, Centre of Excellence for Digitalization of Microbial Food Safety Risk Assessment and Quality Parameters for Accurate Food Authenticity Certification (FoodHub) (grant 013660/2 from 2019).
Contributor Information
Werner Ruppitsch, Email: werner.ruppitsch@ages.at.
Aleksandra Martinovic, Email: aleksandra.martinovic@udg.edu.me.
Irene L. G. Newton, Indiana University, Bloomington
REFERENCES
- 1.Graves AK, Weaver RW. 2010. Characterization of enterococci populations collected from a subsurface flow constructed wetland. J Appl Microbiol 108:1226–1234. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04516.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bae HS, Hou A. 2013. 23S rRNA gene-based enterococci community signatures in Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana, USA, following urban runoff inputs after Hurricane Katrina. Microb Ecol 65:289–301. doi: 10.1007/s00248-012-0166-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Oravcova V, Svec P, Literak I. 2017. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci with vanA and vanB genes in Australian gulls. Environ Microbiol Rep 9:316–318. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lopes MFS, Simões AP, Tenreiro R, Marques JJF, Crespo MTB. 2006. Activity and expression of a virulence factor, gelatinase, in dairy enterococci. Int J Food Microbiol 112:208–214. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bhat NR, Shivashankar SBK, Dhanashree B. 2021. Antibiogram of urinary Enterococcus isolates from a tertiary care hospital. Infect Disord Drug Targets 21:146–150. doi: 10.2174/1871526520666200403140618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Karna A, Baral R, Khanal B. 2019. Characterization of clinical isolates of Enterococci with special reference to glycopeptide susceptibility at a tertiary care center of eastern Nepal. Int J Microbiol 2019:7936156. doi: 10.1155/2019/7936156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Goel V, Kumar D, Kumar R, Mathur P, Singh S. 2016. Community acquired enterococcal urinary tract infections and antibiotic resistance profile in north India. J Lab Physicians 8:50–54. doi: 10.4103/0974-2727.176237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Padmasini E, Padmaraj R, Ramesh SS. 2014. High level aminoglycoside resistance and distribution of aminoglycoside resistant genes among clinical isolates of Enterococcus species in Chennai, India. Sci World J 2014:329157. doi: 10.1155/2014/329157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Dusemund B, Kouba M, Kos Durjava M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Anguita M, Galobart J, Holczknecht O, Manini P, Tarres-Call J, Pettenati E, Pizzo F. 2019. Safety and efficacy of Bonvital (Enterococcus faecium, DSM 7134) as an additive in water for drinking for sows. EFSA J 17:e05612. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jin Y, Luo B, Cai J, Yang B, Zhang Y, Tian F, Ni Y. 2021. Evaluation of indigenous lactic acid bacteria of raw mare milk from pastoral areas in Xinjiang, China, for potential use in probiotic fermented dairy products. J Dairy Sci 104:5166–5184. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.International Organization for Standardization. 1998. ISO 15214:1998: microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—horizontal method for the enumeration of mesophilic lactic acid bacteria—colony-count technique at 30 degrees C. https://www.iso.org/standard/26853.html.
- 12.Martinovic A, Cabal A, Nisic A, Sucher J, Stöger A, Allerberger F, Ruppitsch W. 2021. Genome sequences of Lactococcus garvieae and Lactococcus petauri strains isolated from traditional Montenegrin brine cheeses. Microbiol Resour Announc 10:e00546-21. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00546-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Van Heel AJ, de Jong A, Song C, Viel JH, Kok J, Kuipers OP. 2018. BAGEL4: a user-friendly web server to thoroughly mine RiPPs and bacteriocins. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W278–W281. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel GP, Medema MH, Weber T. 2021. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W29–W35. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li W, O’Neill KR, Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Chetvernin V, Badretdin A, Coulouris G, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Durkin AS, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Lanczycki CJ, Song JS, Thanki N, Wang J, Yamashita RA, Yang M, Zheng C, Marchler-Bauer A, Thibaud-Nissen F. 2021. RefSeq: expanding the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline reach with protein family model curation. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D1020–D1028. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Glöckner FO, Peplies J. 2016. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cosentino S, Voldby Larsen M, Møller Aarestrup F, Lund O. 2013. PathogenFinder: distinguishing friend from foe using bacterial whole genome sequence data. PLoS One 8:e77302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under BioProject accession number PRJNA882413 and BioSample accession number SAMN30933858. This is the first version of this genome. The raw sequence reads have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession numbers SRR21656176 and SRR22245459.
