Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2022 Dec 20;12(1):e01191-22. doi: 10.1128/mra.01191-22

Complete Genome Sequences of Cluster F1 Mycobacteriophages Akhila and MilanaBonita

Umer Ahsan a, Nimra Ali a, Chelsea Akintunde a, Mohamed Ali a, Caroline Bond a, Brittney Canada a, Soban Choudhry a, Dennis Cortez a, Nia Dennis a, Tamia Gomez a, Seerat Hameed a, Daniel Higgins a, Keisha Lacayo a, Zeeshan Memon a, Shubh Patel a, Joel Philip a, Ramon Polanco a, Anshika Rajput a, Malaika Raza a, Anthony Recenello a, Benjamin Scariah a, Emmaline Seide a, Stephany Shaji a, Ariel Shalonov a, Emaan Tariq a, Zainab Tariq a, Blessy Thomas a, Rita Reddy a, Fernando E Nieto-Fernandez a, Jillian C Nissen a,
Editor: Kenneth M Stedmanb
PMCID: PMC9872713  PMID: 36537788

ABSTRACT

Akhila and MilanaBonita are mycobacteriophages that were isolated from soil in New York using Mycobacterium smegmatis. Both phages have genomes that are 56,251 bp long and contain 99 genes; the genomes differ by only 1 nucleotide. Based on gene content similarity to phages in the Actinobacteriophage Database, both phages are assigned to cluster F1.

ANNOUNCEMENT

The phylum Actinobacteria consists of several human pathogens, notably members of the genus Mycobacterium (1). Bacteriophages are increasingly being considered as therapeutic agents to treat multidrug-resistant bacterial infections (24). Here, we describe the isolation and characterization of two mycobacteriophages, Akhila and MilanaBonita, which were isolated from soil samples collected on Long Island, New York (Table 1), in 2019 and 2018, respectively, using standard methods (5). In brief, soil samples were washed with 7H9 liquid medium, and bacteriophages were collected following filtration of the wash using a 0.22-μm-pore filter. This filtered wash was then inoculated with Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155. Following incubation for 3 days at 37°C with shaking, the culture was centrifuged and filtered, and the filtrate was plated in a soft agar overlay containing M. smegmatis and incubated at 37°C. Both Akhila and MilanaBonita were purified through two rounds of plating and formed slightly turbid plaques (2.5 mm in diameter, with irregular edges) after 48 h at 37°C. Negative-staining transmission electron microscopy revealed that Akhila possesses a siphovirus morphology, with a capsid 86 to 89 nm in diameter and a tail 287 to 291 nm in length (n = 3) (Fig. 1).

TABLE 1.

Soil sampling information, sequencing results, and genome characteristics for Akhila and MilanaBonita

Phage Soil collection site coordinates Soil collection date Sequencing coverage (×) Genome length (bp) GC content (%) Genome termini No. of genes
Akhila 40.797324N, 73.572221W September 2019 1,484 56,251 62.1 3′ single-stranded overhangs (5′-CGGAAGGCGC-3′) 99
MilanaBonita 40.86299N, 73.10535W March 2018 176 56,251 62.1 3′ single-stranded overhangs (5′-CGGAAGGCGC-3′) 99

FIG 1.

FIG 1

(A) Plaque morphology of Akhila. (B) Lysates of Akhila were mounted on Formvar-coated copper grids, stained with uranyl acetate (1%), and imaged with a JEOL JEM-2100 electron microscope at a magnification of ×20,000.

Phage DNA was isolated using the Promega Wizard DNA cleanup kit, prepared for sequencing using the NEBNext Ultra II library preparation kit, and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument with v3 reagents. Sequencing generated 585,578 and 70,313 single-end 150-bp reads for Akhila and MilanaBonita, respectively. Raw reads were assembled using Newbler v2.9, and Consed v29 was used to confirm that the genomes were complete and accurate and to determine phage termini (6). Sequencing results and genome characteristics are provided in Table 1. Notably, the genomes of the two phages differ by only 1 nucleotide, despite soil sample collection occurring at different locations (approximately 24.5 miles apart) in different years.

The genomes were annotated using DNA Master (http://cobamide2.bio.pitt.edu), PECAAN (https://discover.kbrinsgd.org), Glimmer v3.02 (7), GeneMark v2.5 (8), and Starterator v1.1. tRNA and transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) predictions were made using ARAGORN v1.2.38 (9) and tRNAscan-SE v3.0 (10). No tRNAs or tmRNAs were detected in either phage genome. Functional assignments were determined using BLASTp searches against the NCBI nonredundant database v2.13.0 and the Actinobacteriophage Database (11), HHpred (with the Conserved Domain Database [CDD], the SCOPe70 database, the Pfam-A database, and the Protein Data Bank [PDB]) (12), and Phamerator (13). All software was run using default parameters. Both phages contain 99 protein-coding genes, of which all but 9 are transcribed on one strand. Based on gene content similarity (GCS) of ≥35% to phages in the Actinobacteriophage Database (https://phagesdb.org), as determined using the Actinobacteriophage Database GCS tool, both phages are assigned to phage cluster F1. Consistent with phages in this cluster, Akhila and MilanaBonita are predicted to be temperate, encoding a predicted tyrosine integrase (gp37), a predicted immunity repressor (gp39), a predicted excise protein (gp42), and a predicted Cro protein (gp40). Both phages also contain a predicted mycobacteriophage mobile element 1 (MPME1) (gp74), which is present in some cluster F1 phages (14). The difference between the two phages is a single nucleotide substitution (which does not alter any gene start or stop site) within gene 19, which encodes a minor tail protein.

Data availability.

Further information about phage characteristics is available at PhagesDB. The GenBank accession numbers are MW924649 for Akhila (https://phagesdb.org/phages/Akhila/) and MZ681519 for MilanaBonita (https://phagesdb.org/phages/MilanaBonita/), and the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) accession numbers are SRX14443480 for Akhila and SRX14597706 for MilanaBonita.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) Science Education Alliance-Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (SEA-PHAGES) program for the opportunity for our students to participate in the phage-hunting and annotation project. We also thank the members of the University of Pittsburgh SEA-PHAGES team for their feedback and assistance during the isolation, archiving, and annotation of these phages. Finally, we thank the SEA-PHAGES Mycobacteriophage Annotation Review Team (SMART) members for the quality control of our annotations.

Contributor Information

Jillian C. Nissen, Email: nissenj@oldwestbury.edu.

Kenneth M. Stedman, Portland State University

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gao B, Gupta RS. 2012. Phylogenetic framework and molecular signatures for the main clades of the phylum Actinobacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76:66–112. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.05011-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dedrick RM, Smith BE, Cristinziano M, Freeman KG, Jacobs-Sera D, Belessis Y, Brown AW, Cohen KA, Davidson RM, van Duin D, Gainey A, Garcia CB, George CRR, Haidar G, Ip W, Iredell J, Khatami A, Little JS, Malmivaara K, McMullan BJ, Michalik DE, Moscatelli A, Nick JA, Ortiz MGT, Polenakovik HM, Robinson PD, Skurnik M, Solomon DA, Soothill J, Spencer H, Wark P, Worth A, Schooley RT, Benson CA, Hatfull GF. 2022. Phage therapy of Mycobacterium infections: compassionate-use of phages in twenty patients with drug-resistant mycobacterial disease. Clin Infect Dis ciac453. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dedrick RM, Guerrero-Bustamante CA, Garlena RA, Russell DA, Ford K, Harris K, Gilmour KC, Soothill J, Jacobs-Sera D, Schooley RT, Hatfull GF, Spencer H. 2019. Engineered bacteriophages for treatment of a patient with a disseminated drug-resistant Mycobacterium abscessus. Nat Med 25:730–733. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0437-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nick JA, Dedrick RM, Gray AL, Vladar EK, Smith BE, Freeman KG, Malcolm KC, Epperson LE, Hasan NA, Hendrix J, Callahan K, Walton K, Vestal B, Wheeler E, Rysavy NM, Poch K, Caceres S, Lovell VK, Hisert KB, de Moura VC, Chatterjee D, De P, Weakly N, Martiniano SL, Lynch DA, Daley CL, Strong M, Jia F, Hatfull GF, Davidson RM. 2022. Host and pathogen response to bacteriophage engineered against Mycobacterium abscessus lung infection. Cell 185:1860–1874.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Poxleitner M, Pope W, Jacobs-Sera D, Sivanathan V, Hatfull GF. 2018. HHMI SEA-PHAGES phage discovery guide. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD. https://seaphagesphagediscoveryguide.helpdocsonline.com/home. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Russell DA. 2018. Sequencing, assembling, and finishing complete bacteriophage genomes. Methods Mol Biol 1681:109–125. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lukashin AV, Borodovsky M. 1998. GeneMark.hmm: new solutions for gene finding. Nucleic Acids Res 26:1107–1115. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.4.1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Söding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. 2005. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W244–W248. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cresawn SG, Bogel M, Day N, Jacobs-Sera D, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 2011. Phamerator: a bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 12:395. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sampson T, Broussard GW, Marinelli LJ, Jacobs-Sera D, Ray M, Ko CC, Russell D, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 2009. Mycobacteriophages BPs, Angel and Halo: comparative genomics reveals a novel class of ultra-small mobile genetic elements. Microbiology (Reading) 155:2962–2977. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.030486-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Further information about phage characteristics is available at PhagesDB. The GenBank accession numbers are MW924649 for Akhila (https://phagesdb.org/phages/Akhila/) and MZ681519 for MilanaBonita (https://phagesdb.org/phages/MilanaBonita/), and the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) accession numbers are SRX14443480 for Akhila and SRX14597706 for MilanaBonita.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES