Skip to main content
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine logoLink to American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
. 2022 Mar 30;205(10):1239. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202109-2181IM

Pulmonary Air Embolism in a Patient with COVID-19 with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support

Julia Tejero-Aranguren 1, Jordi Riera 2,3,4, María Martínez-Martínez 2,3, Eduard Argudo 2,3, Elisabet Papiol 2,3, Clara Palmada 2,3, Luis Chiscano-Camón 2,3, Abrahán Mera 2,3, Camilo Bonilla 2,3, Elisabet Gallart 2, Pilar Girón 2, Ricard Ferrer 2,3,4
PMCID: PMC9872794  PMID: 35353653

A 53-year-old male with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was admitted to the ICU for refractory hypoxemia requiring venovenous femorofemoral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), with a 25-F, 55-cm multiperforated cannula draining blood from the inferior vena cava and a 25-F, 55-cm non-multiperforated cannula returning blood to the right atrium. A computed tomography scan was performed on Day 35. Contrast was administered using a central venous catheter in the left internal jugular vein. The process was uneventful, with no significant variations in ECMO flow or pressures and no activation of the bubble sensor in the drainage line. The patient remained asymptomatic, without hemodynamic changes. A large amount of air in the pulmonary trunk was identified in the computed tomography imaging (Figure 1). In the echocardiographic evaluation, no signs of air presence were identified, and the right ventricular function was normal. No specific treatment was established, but ECMO weaning was stopped for 24 hours. The patient was successfully weaned 6 days later, after 41 days of ECMO.

Figure 1.


Figure 1.

Three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) angiography of pulmonary arteries showing an intravascular air level at the origin of the contrast-enhanced pulmonary artery trunk indicating air embolism, and same slide of the conventional CT image.

The use of ECMO modifies normal physiology and may cause unexpected life-threatening complications: in this case a pulmonary air embolism in an a priori conventional clinical scenario. The negative pressures around the drainage cannula may have caused air to enter through the central venous catheter during contrast administration; it did not enter the circuit but reached the pulmonary circulation directly. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of pulmonary air embolism in this setting.

Footnotes

Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202109-2181IM on March 30, 2022

Author disclosures are available with the text of this article at www.atsjournals.org.


Articles from American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine are provided here courtesy of American Thoracic Society

RESOURCES