Skip to main content
Canadian Urological Association Journal logoLink to Canadian Urological Association Journal
. 2022 Aug 30;17(1):E44–E45. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7939

Case – Trapped ureteroscope during a surgery: Safe overnight dilatation

Jonathan Fadel 1,, Jonathan Cloutier 1, Michel Bureau 1
PMCID: PMC9872825  PMID: 36121888

KEY MESSAGES.

  • Ureteroscopy is a common urology surgical procedure.

  • Flexible ureteroscope entrapment is a very rare endourological complication.

  • Leaving the ureteroscope in place overnight can achieve passive dilatation of the ureter.

  • Overnight passive dilatation is a safe alternative following other maneuvers.

Introduction

Ureteroscopy is a very common procedure in urology, with broadened indications associated with minimally invasive therapies. It is one of the techniques most widely used for upper urinary tract pathology. Many complications have been reported but none mention a trapped ureteroscope in the ureter. We present the case of a patient who underwent a flexible ureteroscopy and the management following entrapment of the surgical instrument in the ureter with passive dilation overnight.

Case report

A 24-year-old healthy male with no previous urological history presented with abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) scan showed an 8.4 mm stone lodged in the right proximal ureter and a 13 mm stone in the left proximal ureter. There were also 7 mm and a 10 mm stones in the right and left kidneys, respectively. The patient was stable, had no signs of infection, and his pain was relieved with narcotics. His serum creatinine level and complete blood count were normal. Due to bilateral obstruction, the patient was consented and brought for ureteroscopy.

During the procedure, we could not progress by the stone in the right ureter after canulating with a guidewire. A retrograde pyelography confirmed an intact anatomy. We passed a hydrophilic guidewire and proceeded to coaxial dilation of the ureterovesical junction up to 10 Fr. After attempting with a rigid ureteroscope, which did not pass the junction, we smoothly passed an 8.5 Fr high-definition flexible ureteroscope (Storz Flex-Xc model). Holmium laser was then used to fragment the stone into submillimeter particles. We withdrew the flexible ureteroscope under direct vision.

While withdrawing the ureteroscope, we noted some resistance in the middle ureter. After applying a gentle traction, we brought the scope at the distal ureteral level, where it was trapped and would not move further. We believe there were stone fragments stuck between the scope and the ureter.

First, we used a 6 Fr rigid ureteroscope and tried to pass by the narrowing point, which was futile. Then, we tried to progress with a hydrophilic guidewire and a ureteral catheter, both of which were ineffective. Following these attempts, we injected a mixed solution of normal saline and xylocaine gel around the flexible ureteroscope, which helped achieve a small gain by moving the device at approximately 3 cm from the ureterovesical junction. We tried multiple back and forth motions, but the scope did not move. We applied a light pressure at the ureterovesical junction with a 20 Fr rigid cystoscope and pulled the ureteroscope in parallel, but the outcome remained similar. Following more than an hour of procedure, we sought advice from a colleague and opted to leave the flexible ureteroscope in place and aim for a passive dilation.

We left a stent in the contralateral ureter and then placed the stuck ureteroscope in a sealed sterile bag to limit contamination.

The patient was hospitalized and agreed to a secondary surgery the next day. We presented the possibility of ureteral avulsion, abdominal laparotomy, and associated complications. He empirically received oral antibiotic for a seven-day total period following initial surgery.

In the second surgery, after getting the patient prepped and draped, we gently pulled the ureteroscope and removed it without difficulty. The guidewire initially passed through the scope was still in place. We then proceeded to a rigid ureteroscopy and visualized a small breach in the mucosa, but no deep tear nor avulsion of the ureter. A right ureteral stent was installed.

The stents remained in place for eight weeks to optimize healing, after which we performed a ureteroscopy and found local edema without stenosis nor further complications. Left-side ureteroscopy was performed, with new bilateral stents placed and removed after seven days by pulling on the attached string.

The patient required three more interventions for bilateral kidney stones over a followup period of more than 10 months. A metabolic workup was prescribed but has not yet been done by the patient. He is seen regularly on followup and is well, without residual urinary problems.

Discussion

In 2012, kidney stone prevalence was as high as 10.6% in men and 7.1% in women,1 with an estimated cost of 5 billion USD.2,3 Kidney stone risk factors include an aging population,4 obesity, food intake,5 diminished fluid, and calcium intake.6

Despite an increasing number of ureteroscopy cases performed worldwide, associated complication rates remain low.7 These can be classified as minor or major,8 with the latter condition being ureteral perforations and avulsions. Herein, we have presented what we believe is an exceptional and rarely documented situation in endourology. Hubosky et al reported few cases of locked deflection, with most of successful removal following retrograde maneuvers.9 The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s MAUDE database disclosed a stuck ureteroscope with retraction techniques and a rigid cystoscope used to help retrieval.10

Medical expulsive therapy (MET) should be considered for ureterolithiasis with positive outcomes for ureteroscopy following preoperative alpha-blockers, showing significant reduction for the need of ureteral orifice dilation11 and higher rate of access to stones.12 None have evaluated medication use in material entrapment, as it is a rare situation. In our case, the patient did not receive alpha-blockers prior to surgery.

If a urologist suspects a difficult ureteral ascension, one could consider starting with a semirigid ureteroscopy prior to flexible ureteroscopy to evaluate the ureter under direct vision.

Ureteroscope entrapment is a distinctive and feared complication. After trying multiple maneuvers, one could consider leaving the ureteroscope overnight and aim for safe passive dilatation.

Footnotes

Competing interests: The authors do not report any competing personal or financial interests related to this work.

This paper has been peer-reviewed.

References

  • 1.Scales CD, Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, et al. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012;62:160–5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Saigal CS, Joyce G, Timilsina AR, et al. Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management? Kidney Int. 2005;68:1808–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00599.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC, et al. Urologic Diseases in America project: Urolithiasis. J Urol. 2005;173:848–57. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152082.14384.d7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moudi E, Hosseini SR, Bijani A. Nephrolithiasis in elderly population; effect of demographic characteristics. J Nephropathol. 2017;6:63–8. doi: 10.15171/jnp.2017.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nalini HS, Manickavasakam K, Walter MT. Prevalence and risk factors of kidney stone. GJRA. 2016;5:183–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG. Kidney stones: A global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol. 2010;12:e86–96. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20811557/ [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Somani BK, Giusti G, Sun Y, et al. Complications associated with ureterorenoscopy (URS) related to treatment of urolithiasis: The Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society URS Global study. World J Urol. 2017;35:675–81. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1909-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gaizauskas A, Markevicius M, Gaizauskas S, et al. Possible complications of ureteroscopy in modern endourological era: Two-point or “scabbard” avulsion. Case Rep Urol. 2014;2014:308093. doi: 10.1155/2014/308093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hubosky SG, Raval AJ, Bagley DH. Locked deflection during flexible ureteroscopy: Incidence and elucidation of the mechanism of an underreported complication. J Endourol. 2015;29:907–12. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Accessdata.fda.gov FDA, U. MAUDE Adverse Event Report: Karl Storz endoscopy-America, inc. Ureteroreno-fiberscope flex-x2 ureteroscope and accessories, flexible/rigid. MAUDE adverse event report. [Accessed August 30, 2022]. Updated April 24, 2020. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfMAUDE/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=9852990&pc=FG.
  • 11.Alsaikhan B, Koziarz A, Lee JY, et al. Preoperative alpha-blockers for ureteroscopy for ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Endourol. 2020;34:33–41. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tan H, Li Y, Zhang X, et al. Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of adjunctive alpha-blocker therapy before ureteroscopy in the management of ureteral stones. J Int Med Res. 2020;48:300060520923878. doi: 10.1177/0300060520923878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Urological Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Urological Association

RESOURCES