Abstract
Pregnant and lactating women continue to have some of the lowest levels of vaccine uptake despite COVID-19 vaccine recommendations. It is important to consider why COVID-19 vaccine uptake has lagged counter to robust evidence on vaccine benefits, including concerns about vaccine safety and effectiveness. In this column, I present a summary of research findings, limitations, future directions, and a compilation of guidelines and recommendations from professional and governmental organizations.
The author provides current evidence on the recent proposal to extend Medicaid coverage in the postpartum period.

Summer Sherburne Hawkins, PhD, MS
I closed my last column by highlighting the increase in maternal mortality during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and widening racial and ethnic disparities in maternal deaths (Hoyert, 2022). Provisional data from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO, 2022) illustrated that trends in maternal mortality have continued, and COVID-19 contributed to 25% of these deaths in 2020 and 2021. Women who become infected with COVID-19 during pregnancy are at higher risk for severe illness, complications from previous comorbidities, and preeclampsia, and their infants are more likely to be low birth weight and stillborn (Allotey et al. 2020; Villar et al., 2021; Wei et al., 2021).
COVID-19 is a preventable risk factor for maternal and infant morbidity and mortality, and vaccination is a critical preventive measure. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 2022), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG, 2022), and other professional organizations (ACOG, 2021) recommended that persons who are pregnant, trying to get pregnant or may try in the future, or breastfeeding receive the COVID-19 vaccine primary series and bivalent booster. However, currently and throughout the pandemic, vaccine uptake among pregnant women has remained at similar or lower levels than uptake for women of reproductive age who are not pregnant (CDC, 2023), despite the fact that pregnant women are at higher risk for severe disease. As such, it is important to consider why COVID-19 vaccination has lagged counter to a robust body of evidence on vaccine benefits and the clinical and policy implications for increasing vaccine uptake.
Starting in December 2020, pregnant women became eligible to receive any of the three available COVID-19 vaccines through emergency use authorization (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2022). However, in the initial mRNA vaccine trials, pregnant women were excluded. Bianchi et al. (2021) highlighted the missed opportunity to include pregnant and lactating people in the COVID-19 safety and efficacy vaccine trials: “Pregnant people were excluded from participating in clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines, but they are now being encouraged to receive the vaccine on a clinical basis” (p. 1041). Some of the first evidence on the safety of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant persons was published online in April 2021 based on an evaluation of the v-safe After Vaccination Health Checker for COVID-19 Vaccine surveillance system, v-safe COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry, and Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (Shimabukuro et al., 2021). Shimabukuro et al. (2021) compared adverse events and pregnancy and infant outcomes between women who were vaccinated versus those who were not and concluded that no safety concerns were associated with the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.
While research findings specific to pregnant women were slowly being released, COVID-19 vaccine uptake remained low among this group during the first 6 months of the vaccine rollout. Using data from the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink, Razzaghi et al. (2021) found that through May 2021, 16.3% of pregnant women received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine; uptake was lower among younger, Black, and Hispanic women, while uptake was higher among older, White, and Asian women. In addition, the CDC did not issue its first formal statement about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant and lactating women until August 11, 2021 (CDC, 2021). This statement was released 8 months after adults first started receiving the vaccine through emergency use authorization and 4 months after the publication of the Shimabukuro et al. (2021) study on COVID-19 vaccine safety. In contrast, ACOG issued its first guidance on vaccination for pregnant and lactating people in December 2020 (ACOG, 2022).
Evidence has continued to build on the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women (Fu et al., 2021; Rawal et al., 2022). Blakeway et al. (2022) compared pregnancy and infant outcomes in a cohort of pregnant women from the United Kingdom who received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine before birth versus those who had not. Although there was low vaccine uptake at 28.5%, the adverse pregnancy and infant outcomes were similar between groups, which supported earlier findings on vaccine safety (Shimabukuro et al., 2021). Receiving at least two doses of COVID-19 vaccines has been shown to reduce severe disease and mortality during pregnancy. Through a data linkage study, Paixao et al. (2022) examined the effectiveness of the CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant women in Brazil by comparing severe, hospitalized, or fatal COVID-19 between women who had versus those who had not been vaccinated. The authors found that one dose of the CoronaVac vaccine was 67.7% effective, two doses were 85.4% effective against severe COVID-19, and there were no deaths among partially or fully vaccinated women. Using a case-control study, Schrag et al. (2022) examined the effectiveness of zero, two, and three doses of the mRNA vaccine on medically-attended COVID-19 visits in the United States, which they defined as COVID-19-related emergency department or urgent care encounters or hospitalization. The authors found that two or three mRNA doses were at least 75% effective against medically-attended COVID-19 visits during the Delta variant period, but protection waned during Omicron. Schrag et al. (2022) concluded that these findings provide evidence to support boosters for pregnant women, which is consistent with current recommendations.
Researchers also found that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women extended to their infants (Fu et al., 2021; Rawal et al., 2022). Gray et al. (2021) found that mRNA vaccine-induced antibody titers were similar among pregnant, lactating, and nonpregnant women and were overall higher than those induced by COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, vaccine-generated antibodies were evident in all umbilical cord blood and breast milk samples, which suggests that immunity for infants is conferred via the placenta and breast milk. Similarly, Shook et al. (2022) found that vaccinated women had higher titers at birth than those who were infected by COVID-19, and umbilical cord titers were higher after vaccination than natural infection. The authors followed the infants to 6 months and found that 57% of those born to COVID-19 vaccinated mothers had detectable antibodies compared with 8% of those born to mothers naturally infected. Halasa et al. (2022) found that completion of the two-dose mRNA primary vaccine series during pregnancy was associated with a 61% reduction in COVID-19-related hospitalizations among infants aged less than 6 months and an 80% reduction if the series was completed later in pregnancy. Taken together, these findings are promising and suggest that immunity conferred through maternal COVID-19 vaccination protects against severe illness and lasts until infants are eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine at age 6 months (CDC, 2022).
Despite expanded vaccine rollout and Food and Drug Administration authorization of the COVID-19 vaccine in August 2021 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2022), as of mid-December 2022, 71.5% of pregnant people have completed the COVID-19 vaccine primary series and racial and ethnic disparities in vaccine uptake are consistent with those from mid-2021 (CDC, 2023): 58.2% of Black women, 68.1% of White women, 70.9% of Hispanic women, and 89.4% of Asian women have completed the primary series. Even with recent recommendations for the bivalent booster (ACOG, 2022; CDC, 2022; USDHHS, 2022), only 17.1% of pregnant people have received the booster; the lowest uptake is among Black (9.0%) and Hispanic (9.3%) women, and the highest uptake is among Asian (23.7%) and White (23.9%) women (CDC, 2023).
Researchers have also confirmed racial and ethnic disparities in vaccine uptake in systematic reviews (Galanis et al., 2022; Rawal et al., 2022; Sarantaki et al., 2022) and identified additional predictors of COVID-19 vaccine refusal among pregnant women, including younger age, less education, mistrust in the government, and fear about the safety and side effects of the vaccine (Galanis et al., 2022; Rawal et al., 2022). In contrast, COVID-19 vaccine uptake is higher among women who are older, have higher socioeconomic circumstances, have more comorbidities, know more about COVID-19, are confident that the vaccine is safe and effective, and have had communication with a medical professional about the vaccine (Rawal et al., 2022; Sarantaki et al., 2022).
While it is necessary to consider how limited study designs (e.g., non-randomized controlled trials) and delayed guidance from the CDC may have contributed to low COVID-19 vaccine uptake during pregnancy (CDC, 2023; Razzaghi et al., 2021), the social context in the United States cannot be ignored. Misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine has been rampant throughout the pandemic, and pregnant women have not been spared. Regan et al. (2022) conducted a national online survey of 2,213 pregnant persons in the United States between December 2020 and July 2021 and found that 55.4% planned to or received a COVID-19 vaccine before or during pregnancy, 27.0% planned to get vaccinated after pregnancy, and 17.5% were unsure or had no plans to get vaccinated. Pregnant women who believed that COVID-19 vaccines were safe and whose health care providers recommended vaccination were more likely to plan to or receive vaccines than those who did not believe vaccines were safe or have a provider who recommended vaccination. While the most commonly cited reason for being vaccinated was to protect themselves (34.2%) or their infants (32.7%), the primary reason for refusing vaccination was concern about side effects (42.6%; Regan et al., 2022).
As we head into the third year of the pandemic, misinformation and beliefs continue to be barriers to vaccine uptake. In May 2022, the Kaiser Family Foundation conducted a nationally representative survey of 1,537 women who were pregnant or trying to get pregnant and found that 24% believed pregnant women should not get a COVID-19 vaccine, 17% believed it was unsafe for lactating women to get vaccinated, and 16% believed the vaccine caused infertility. However, an additional 40% of women reported that they had heard misinformation about each of these beliefs and were unsure if they were true. Based on these findings, nearly three-fourths of respondents who were pregnant or trying to get pregnant believed or had heard misinformation against getting the COVID-19 vaccine (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2022).
While hindsight is 20-20, learning from the current pandemic will ensure a more thoughtful response to the next. Bianchi et al. (2021) called for the implementation of the recommendations of the Task Force on Research Specific to Pregnant Women and Lactating Women, particularly the inclusion of pregnant and lactating women in clinical research (Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2018). To date, researchers have had to use innovative study designs and data linkage to investigate the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant women and infants. As the pandemic continues, it is essential for researchers to conduct longitudinal studies to more fully understand the long-term immunological and health effects of the vaccine. In addition, researchers who design studies to examine predictors of vaccine uptake and acceptance need to use consistent measures to compare findings across populations and time to inform interventions.
Timely, clear, and consistent communication from the CDC and professional organizations is essential for patients to make informed decisions and providers to encourage and support COVID-19 vaccine uptake. It is necessary for recommendations to explicitly include pregnant and lactating women. Research on developing effective communication and combating misinformation through interdisciplinary collaborations between communication experts, public health leadership, and clinicians will help move this agenda forward. Furthermore, researchers need to ensure representativeness and include sufficient sample sizes to examine vaccine uptake, safety and effectiveness, misinformation, and barriers to vaccination overall and across marginalized groups. Increasing vaccination among women of color needs to be a priority. Focused efforts are required to engage with women of color and partner with their communities to pursue research and develop interventions that address and ultimately eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in vaccine uptake (Marcell et al., 2022; Obasanya et al., 2022).
Biography
Summer Sherburne Hawkins, PhD, MS, is an associate professor, School of Social Work, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.
References
- Allotey J., Stallings E., Bonet M., Yap M., Chatterjee S., Kew T.…PregCOV-19 Living Systematic Review Consortium Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: Living systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal. 2020;370 doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists . 2022. COVID-19 vaccination considerations for obstetric-gynecologic care: Practice advisory.https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-advisory/articles/2020/12/covid-19-vaccination-considerations-for-obstetric-gynecologic-care [Google Scholar]
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists . 2021. Statement of strong medical consensus for vaccination of pregnant individuals against COVID-19.https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2021/08/statement-of-strong-medical-consensus-for-vaccination-of-pregnant-individuals-against-covid-19 [Google Scholar]
- Bianchi D.W., Kaeser L., Cernich A.N. Involving pregnant individuals in clinical research on COVID-19 vaccines. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2021;325(11):1041–1042. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blakeway H., Prasad S., Kalafat E., Heath P.T., Ladhani S.N., Doare K.L.…Khalil A. COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy: Coverage and safety. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022;226(2):236.e1–236.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . 2021. New CDC data: COVID-19 vaccination safe for pregnant people.https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/s0811-vaccine-safe-pregnant.html [Google Scholar]
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . 2022. Summary document for interim clinical considerations for use of COVID-19 vaccines currently authorized or approved in the United States.https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/summary-interim-clinical-considerations.pdf [Google Scholar]
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . 2023. COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people aged 18-49 years overall, by race/ethnicity, and date reported to CDC - Vaccine Safety Datalink, United States.https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations-pregnant-women [Google Scholar]
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development . 2018. List of recommendations from the Task Force on Research Specific to Pregnant Women and Lactating Women (PRGLAC)https://www.nichd.nih.gov/about/advisory/PRGLAC/recommendations# [Google Scholar]
- Fu W., Sivajohan B., McClymont E., Albert A., Elwood C., Ogilvie G., Money D. Systematic review of the safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant and lactating individuals and their infants. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2022;156(3):406–417. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galanis P., Vraka I., Siskou O., Konstantakopoulou O., Katsiroumpa A., Kaitelidou D. Uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccines. 2022;10(5):766. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10050766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gray K.J., Bordt E.A., Atyeo C., Deriso E., Akinwunmi B., Young N.…Edlow A.G. COVID-19 vaccine response in pregnant and lactating women: A cohort study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021;225(3):303.e1–303.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halasa N.B., Olson S.M., Staat M.A., Newhams M.M., Price A.M., Boom J.A.…Overcoming COVID-19 Network Effectiveness of maternal vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy against COVID-19–associated hospitalization in infants aged <6 months — 17 states, July 2021–January 2022. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2022;71:264–270. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7107e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoyert D.L. 2022. Maternal mortality rates in the United States, 2020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kaiser Family Foundation . May 27, 2022. Misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines and pregnancy is widespread, including among women who are pregnant or planning to get pregnant.https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/press-release/misinformation-about-covid-19-vaccines-and-pregnancy-is-widespread-including-among-women-who-are-pregnant-or-planning-to-get-pregnant/ [Google Scholar]
- Marcell L., Dokania E., Navia I., Baxter C., Crary I., Rutz S.…Waldorf K.M.A. One Vax Two Lives: A social media campaign and research program to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022;227(5):685–695.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Obasanya M., Igenoza O., Gupta S., McElroy K., Brannon G.E., Brown K. Racial and ethnic differences in maternal and child COVID-19 vaccination intent among pregnant and postpartum women in the USA (April-June 2020): An application of health belief model. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 2022:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01434-z. (Online ahead of print) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paixao E.S., Wong K.L.M., Alves F.J.O., de Araújo Oliveira V., Cerqueira-Silva T., Júnior J.B.…Barral-Netto M. CoronaVac vaccine is effective in preventing symptomatic and severe COVID-19 in pregnant women in Brazil: A test-negative case-control study. BMC Medicine. 2022;20(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02353-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Razzaghi H., Meghani M., Pingali C., Crane B., Naleway A., Weintraub E.…Patel S.A. COVID-19 vaccination coverage among pregnant women during pregnancy — Eight integrated health care organizations, United States, December 14, 2020–May 8, 2021. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2021;70(24):895–899. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7024e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rawal S., Tackett R.L., Stone R.H., Young H.N. COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people in the United States: A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM. 2022;4(4) doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Regan A.K., Kaur R., Nosek M., Swathi P.A., Gu N.Y. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and coverage among pregnant persons in the United States. Preventive Medicine Reports. 2022;29 doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sarantaki A., Kalogeropoulou V.E., Taskou C., Nanou C., Lykeridou A. COVID-19 vaccination and related determinants of hesitancy among pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccines. 2022;10(12):2055. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10122055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schrag S.J., Verani J.R., Dixon B.E., Page J.M., Butterfield K.A., Gaglani M.…Naleway A.L. Estimation of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine effectiveness against medically attended COVID-19 in pregnancy during periods of delta and omicron variant predominance in the United States. JAMA Network Open. 2022;5(9) doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shook L.L., Atyeo C.G., Yonker L.M., Fasano A., Gray K.J., Alter G., Edlow A.G. Durability of anti-spike antibodies in infants after maternal COVID-19 vaccination or natural infection. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2022;327(11):1087–1089. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shimabukuro T.T., Kim S.Y., Myers T.R., Moro P.L., Oduyebo T., Panagiotakopoulos L.…CDC v-safe COVID-19 Pregnancy Registry Team Preliminary findings of mRNA Covid-19 vaccine safety in pregnant persons. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;384(24):2273–2282. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . 2022. COVID-19 vaccines.https://www.hhs.gov/coronavirus/covid-19-vaccines/index.html [Google Scholar]
- U.S. Government Accountability Office . 2022. Maternal health: Outcomes worsened and disparities persisted during the pandemic.https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-105871 [Google Scholar]
- Villar J., Ariff S., Gunier R.B., Thiruvengadam R., Rauch S., Kholin A.…Papageorghiou A.T. Maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality among pregnant women with and without COVID-19 infection: The INTERCOVID Multinational Cohort Study. JAMA Pediatrics. 2021;175(8):817–826. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei S.Q., Bilodeau-Bertrand M., Liu S., Auger N. The impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2021;193(16):E540–E548. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.202604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
References
Reviews
Effect of COVID-19 on Pregnancy and Infant Outcomes
Allotey, J., Stallings, E., Bonet, M., Yap, M., Chatterjee, S., Kew, T.,…PregCOV-19 Living Systematic Review Consortium. (2020). Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: Living systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 370, m3320. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3320
Allotey et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review on the clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and infant outcomes in pregnant and recently pregnant women with COVID-19. They described this article as a “living” systematic review and meta-analysis meaning that the review will be updated as new evidence is published. As of May 2022, the article I summarize here is the second update of the original publication. Allotey et al. identified 435 articles (32.4% from the United States) that were published from December 2019 through April 2021. In the included articles, 9% of pregnant or recently pregnant women who attended or were admitted to hospitals for any reason had suspected or confirmed COVID-19. More than one-third of women presented with fever and cough, which were the most common symptoms. Overall, pregnant women were less likely to report symptoms of fever, labored breathing, cough, and pain than women of reproductive age who were not pregnant. Pregnant women were more likely to be admitted to an intensive care unit and have invasive ventilation. Overall, 0.2% of pregnant women who had confirmed COVID-19 died. Risk factors for severe COVID-19 with complications included non-White race/ethnicity, older age, higher body mass index, any pre-existing comorbidity, and pregnancy-related complications. Pregnant women with COVID-19 had an increased risk of death, admission to the intensive care unit, and cesarean than their nonvaccinated counterparts. Infants whose mothers had COVID-19 were more likely to be born preterm, still born, and admitted to the NICU than infants whose mothers were not infected.
Allotey et al. noted a number of limitations to the literature and future directions. The sample sizes of existing studies were often too small to examine differences between subgroups, and definitions of clinical manifestations and other outcomes were heterogeneous across studies, which limited comparability. Larger samples, particularly with higher risk subgroups, and consistent case definitions will increase representativeness and comparability respectively. It was also challenging to differentiate the effects of COVID-19 versus complications resulting in disruptions in health care, i.e. staffing shortages, due to the pandemic and COVID-19 mitigation policies, i.e. stay-at-home orders, on maternal and infant outcomes. Finally, COVID-19 variants are emerging, vaccines are evolving, recommendations are being updated, and research is continually being published, so synthesizing studies across countries to inform policy and clinical practice continues to be challenging. The authors noted that future reviews are needed in which reviewers consider the effects of new variants on the prevalence of COVID-19 among pregnant women, manifestation of symptoms, and risk of COVID-19 and pregnancy-related complications.
Wei, S. Q., Bilodeau-Bertrand, M., Liu, S., & Auger, N. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 193(16), E540-E548. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.202604
In this early systematic review, Wei et al. (2021) synthesized the findings from emerging observational studies to identify effects of COVID-19 on maternal and infant outcomes. They identified 42 reports of observational studies (18 from the United States) that were published from the start of the pandemic through January 2021. The authors found that COVID-19 infection during pregnancy was associated with a higher risk for preeclampsia, admission to the intensive care unit, preterm birth, stillbirth, lower birth weight (grams), and admission to the NICU compared to no infection. Among pregnant women with COVID-19, those with a severe infection were at much higher risk for preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, admission to the intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation, cesarean, preterm birth, low birth weight, and admission to the NICU than those with a mild infection.
Reviews
COVID-19 Vaccine Safety and Effectiveness
Fu, W., Sivajohan, B., McClymont, E., Albert, A., Elwood, C., Ogilvie, G., & Money D. (2022). Systematic review of the safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant and lactating individuals and their infants. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 156(3), 406-417. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14008
Fu et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review of the safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy and lactation. They identified the reports of 23 studies of varying methodological designs (14 from the United States) that were published from the start of the pandemic through June 2021. The authors produced a qualitative summary of their findings. In the included studies, researchers quantified the immunological response in breast milk, cord blood, and/or maternal blood after COVID-19 vaccination. Antibody titers were evident in cord blood, but placental transfer ratios (cord blood antibody concentration/maternal serum antibody concentration) varied within and across studies. Researchers also found evidence of increases in IgG, IgM, and IgA titers in the sera of pregnant and lactating people as well as in breast milk. Data on vaccine safety suggested that pregnant and lactating populations experienced vaccine-related reactions at similar levels to the general population, including pain at injection site and fatigue. Although Fu et al. identified only five studies in which researchers examined pregnancy and infant outcomes, all of them found no increased risk of adverse events. In one study, researchers investigated vaccine effectiveness and reported that pregnant women who received the COVID-19 vaccine were less likely to experience infection before birth than those who were not vaccinated. Fu et al. conducted one of the only systematic reviews on immunogenicity in pregnant women and infants in addition to vaccine safety and effectiveness.
Rawal, S., Tackett, R. L., Stone, R. H., & Young, H. N. (2022). COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people in the United States: A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM, 4(4), 100616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100616
Rawal et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review on COVID-19 vaccine safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness among pregnant people in the United States. They identified the reports of 11 observational studies on vaccine safety and 10 reports of observational studies on immunogenicity and effectiveness that were published from January 2020 through February 2022. Regarding vaccine safety, side effects reported by pregnant people were consistent with those reported by the general population. The most common adverse events were injection-site pain and soreness, fever, and fatigue. The authors concluded that the COVID-19 vaccine did not increase adverse pregnancy (e.g., preeclampsia, stillbirth) or infant (e.g., preterm birth, small for gestational age) outcomes compared with no vaccine.
Pregnant people who received the COVID-19 vaccine had a robust immune response with antibody production similar to nonpregnant people. The immunity conferred by COVID-19 vaccination was found to be stronger than the immunity produced by natural infection. Researchers also identified COVID-19 antibodies in the umbilical cord blood and infants themselves, which suggested that immunity was conferred through the placenta and breast milk.
Rawal et al. noted that future studies should include more rigorous study designs and diverse populations, including pregnant people of color and those who reside in rural settings to confirm the findings on the vaccine’s safety and effectiveness against emerging variants.
Reviews
COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake
Galanis, P., Vraka, I., Siskou, O., Konstantakopoulou, O., Katsiroumpa, A., & Kaitelidou, D. (2022). Uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccines, 10(5), 766. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050766
Galanis et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review on COVID-19 vaccine uptake among pregnant women. They identified 11 cross-sectional studies (three from the United States) that were published from the start of the pandemic through March 2022. Across the studies, Galanis et al. estimated that 27.5% of pregnant women received the COVID-19 vaccine, and they identified predictors of vaccine uptake, which included older age, Black or Hispanic race/ethnicity, trust in COVID-19 vaccines, and fear of acquiring COVID-19 during pregnancy. In contrast, vaccine refusal was associated with mistrust in the government, being diagnosed with COVID-19 during pregnancy, and fears about the safety and side effects of the vaccine. The authors noted that research on predictors of vaccine uptake and refusal needs to continue as additional vaccine doses are recommended, and data on vaccine safety and effectiveness continue to be published.
Rawal, S., Tackett, R. L., Stone, R. H., & Young, H. N. (2022). COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people in the United States: A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM, 4(4), 100616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100616
In the same systematic review described above, Rawal et al. (2022) assessed vaccine acceptance among pregnant people. They identified 11 reports of observational studies from the United States that were published from January 2020 through February 2022. In studies conducted before the COVID-19 vaccine was available, 41% to 48% of pregnant people reported interest in receiving it. However, in studies conducted after the COVID-19 vaccine was made available, researchers reported that uptake did not increase, and vaccination levels ranged from 3% to 58%. Rawal et al. found that vaccine acceptance increased among pregnant people who received prior influenza vaccination and had communication with medical professionals about the vaccine. In contrast, COVID-19 vaccine refusal during pregnancy was associated with previous refusal of the influenza vaccine, younger age, African American and Hispanic race and ethnicity, and lower education. Concerns about the vaccine included its safety and effectiveness, fears of pregnancy loss and birth defects, and unknown long-term effects on children.
Sarantaki, A., Kalogeropoulou, V. E., Taskou, C., Nanou, C., & Lykeridou, A. (2022). COVID-19 vaccination and related determinants of hesitancy among pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccines, 10(12), 2055. doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10122055
Sarantaki et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review on attitudes about COVID-19 vaccination and risk factors for vaccine hesitation among pregnant women. They identified the reports of 18 observational studies (seven from the United States) that were published from the start of the pandemic through December 2021. Across the studies, between 17.6% and 84.4% of pregnant women received the COVID-19 vaccine. Sarantaki et al. identified predictors of vaccine uptake among pregnant women, which included older age, White race, higher socioeconomic circumstances, more comorbidities, prior influenza vaccination, prior COVID-19 infection, and higher level of knowledge about COVID-19 and perceiving the vaccine as safe and effective. Since reasons for vaccine hesitancy vary across populations, it is important to consider the findings within the broader context of the countries in which the studies were based.
Reviews
Professional Resources
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2022). COVID-19 vaccination considerations for obstetric-gynecologic care: Practice advisory. https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-advisory/articles/2020/12/covid-19-vaccination-considerations-for-obstetric-gynecologic-care
The ACOG published the first COVID-19 vaccine recommendation in December 2020 but has continually updated guidance as new research is published. The last update was January 6, 2023. ACOG recommended that all eligible persons age 6 months and older, including pregnant and lactating individuals, receive the COVID-19 vaccine series and booster. Vaccination can occur in any trimester, and receiving the vaccine as early in the pregnancy as possible was emphasized to maximize the benefits for women and infants. ACOG recommended the mRNA and Novavax COVID-19 vaccines over the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine for the primary series and the bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine as the booster. ACOG also recommended that obstetrician-gynecologists and other women’s health care professionals lead by example by being vaccinated and encouraging eligible patients to receive the vaccine.
Reviews
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Guidelines for vaccinating pregnant women. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pregnancy/hcp-toolkit/guidelines.html
The CDC ACIP provides vaccine recommendations for pregnant and breastfeeding women. The ACIP recommended the COVID-19 vaccine within the list of routine vaccines for persons who are pregnant, might become pregnant, were recently pregnant, or are breastfeeding. A website (CDC, 2022) provides a link to a summary of recent changes to clinical considerations for use of COVID-19 vaccines currently approved or authorized. A section specifically relates to considerations involving pregnancy, lactation, and fertility.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Interim clinical considerations for use of COVID-19 vaccines currently approved or authorized in the United States. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/interim-considerations-us.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). COVID-19 ACIP vaccine recommendations. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/vacc-specific/covid-19.html
The ACIP continually publishes updated guidance on vaccine recommendations, including publications from Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report associated with COVID-19 ACIP vaccine recommendations and recent bivalent booster doses.
Reviews
Joint Statements
American College of Nurse-Midwives; Fetal Therapy Nurse Network; Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses; Nurse Practitioners in Women’s Health; Society of OB/GYN Hospitalists; & Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. (2021). COVID-19 vaccination if you are pregnant or breastfeeding. https://i7g4f9j6.stackpathcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/02141531/COVID-vaccine-_Patients_JULY-29-2021_final.pdf
The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and other professional organizations, including the Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses, published a joint statement recommending that people who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant and lactating people receive the COVID-19 vaccine based on the CDC guidelines. The statement also provides a summary of research findings on the benefits of vaccination during pregnancy.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2021). Statement of strong medical consensus for vaccination of pregnant individuals against COVID-19. https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2021/08/statement-of-strong-medical-consensus-for-vaccination-of-pregnant-individuals-against-covid-19
The ACOG, American Academy of Pediatrics; American College of Nurse-Midwives; Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; and other professional organizations released a joint statement urging individuals who are pregnant, recently pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or lactating to receive the COVID-19 vaccine to protect themselves, their infants, families, and communities.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists & Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. (2021). ACOG and SMFM recommend COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant individuals. https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2021/07/acog-smfm-recommend-covid-19-vaccination-for-pregnant-individuals
The ACOG and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine issued a joint statement recommending that all pregnant individuals receive the COVID-19 vaccine, particularly in response to low vaccine uptake among pregnant people. The statement emphasized the importance of health professionals recommending vaccination to their patients and that vaccination is safe before, during, or after pregnancy.
Reviews
Implications for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
While data unequivocally show that completion of the COVID-19 vaccine primary series and uptake of the bivalent booster are lower among Black and Hispanic women (CDC, 2023), it is crucial to put these findings into a broader context. The pandemic has disproportionately affected communities of color, and pregnant women of color have shouldered the burden of related morbidity and mortality (GAO, 2022). This injustice results from inequities in our social fabric and involves systemic factors that existed before the pandemic, which in many ways COVID-19 only spotlighted. In communities of color, historical injustices and structural racism are drivers of racial and ethnic disparities in vaccine uptake. Mistrust in the government and in medical and scientific communities is identified as a predictor of COVID-19 vaccine refusal among pregnant women (Galanis et al., 2022). Obasanya et al. (2022) found that in early 2020, COVID-19 vaccination intent for themselves and their infants was lower in Black than White women but similar between Hispanic and White women. Differences were attenuated in the postpartum period and were no longer significant. Interpreting their findings through a health equity lens, these researchers explained that Black women’s vaccine hesitancy is justified considering the historical and current practices embedded in racism, and research suggests that what is perceived as vaccine hesitancy is likely inequitable vaccine communication and distribution (Obasanya et al., 2022). Policies and clinical opportunities that create safe spaces for communication and improve vaccine literacy and accessibility would help address some of these barriers. ACOG (2022) also encouraged health care providers to get vaccinated and serve as examples for their patients.
Partnering with women of color and their communities is essential to develop interventions that will increase vaccination. For example, an interdisciplinary team of researchers in Seattle, Washington created a social media campaign “One Vax Two Lives” to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women (Marcell et al., 2022). This campaign includes a website, social media advertisements, and videos promoting scientific communication and vaccination benefits for mothers and their infants. Marcell et al. engaged with stakeholders, including the Washington State Department of Health, the Washington State Obstetrical Association, and the National Black Leadership Commission on Health, to promote the campaign and provide feedback on content and approach. An evaluation of the campaign using a mixed-method study design is underway. The next phase is to develop new social media content that targets Spanish-speaking Latinx women and Black or Afro-Latinx women. This campaign is just one example of how developing partnerships can increase trust and communication to help address some of the social and systemic inequities experienced by communities of color. The fact that a 10 to 15 percentage point gap exists between Black and White pregnant women who receive the COVID-19 vaccine primary series or booster (CDC, 2023) is a matter of health equity. Eliminating disparities in vaccine uptake is essential to reduce preventable maternal deaths due to COVID-19 (GAO, 2022).
