Abstract
Introduction
Annually, tens of millions of children are being exposed to tuberculosisinfection. Note that children are in higher risk of getting infection and sever types of the disease, detecting the factors associated with transmission of the tuberculosis infection and disease to the exposed children is necessary for disease prevention within the community.
Methods
In this retrospective cohort study, 50 children under 6 who were in close contact with 25 smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis cases in Sistan-Baloochistanprovine, Iran, were investigated. Demographic, behavioral and clinical characteristics of children and index cases were collected and tuberculosis infection and disease was assessed using the WHO guidelines.
Results
Of 50 children exposed to the active cases, 12 (24 %) were infected to tuberculosis but none of them had active disease. We also found significant associations of the history of diabetes mellitus in the index cases (p = 0.043) and large family size (p = 0.026) with the increased risk of infection among the exposed children.
Conclusion
Children under six which are in close contact with diabetic tuberculosis cases in large families are in higher risk of getting infection.
Keywords: Tuberculosis, TB, Children, TST, LTBI, Latent TB infection
1. Introduction
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MBT) is the most common infectious agent leading to mortality and morbidity and affects tens of millions children each year [1]. Due to considerable delay in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis (TB) cases, the infection transmission continues within the community. It has shown that 30 %- 50 % of household contacts can lead to active infection which is more common in children in close contact with the adults TB cases [2].
Based on the surveys carried out by interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA), children are in higher risk of getting TB infection and disease. Moreover, they are more susceptible to disseminated forms of the disease such as miliary tuberculosis and TB meningitisleading to higher mortality [3].
Several factors are related to the transmission of the TB infection including the type of contact with the source of infection, environmental characteristics and also host characteristics such as age and immunity [3], [4]. Considering the higher prevalence of tuberculosis infection and disease among the children in contact with the TB patients, investigating the source of infection and follow up of the household contacts is of great importance leading to better understanding and control of the disease [5], [6], [7].
WHO guidelines have emphasized on the preference of the prophylaxis treatment of children under 5 in household exposures to the active TB cases. More recent guidelines have generalized the mentioned prescriptions to the higher ages of children and even the adults in the high burden countries [8].
Sistan region located in the eastern part of Iran is one of the most affected areas with the highest annual incidence of tuberculosis. It seems that household contacts is one of the main causes of the infection transmission in the region. To be able to control the spread of the infection, early detection of the cases in the younger age groups as well as determining the associated factors of the infection transmission between children and other household members is necessary. Therefore, in the current study, all children under 6 with the close household exposure to the active TB cases were investigated regarding the evidences of any infection or disease as well as relevant associated factors.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Study design
All of the children under six who were in household close contacts with the active smear positive TB cases in Zabol and Nimrooz districts of Sistan&Baloochistan province (the closest area to Afganistan and Pakistan high TB burden countries) with the highest incidence rate of tuberculosis in Iran were retrospectively investigated. It should be noted that families with TB cases without children under six years old age were not participated into the study. The sampling method was census. Therefore, there is no need to estimate the sample size. The protocol of the study was approved by the ethical review board of the Zabol university of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran (Ethical code: IR.ZBMU.REC.1399.011).
2.2. Tuberculin skin test (TST)
Despite the challenges of the TST interpretation and the variability of its results, it is still being used as one of the main methods of TB infection/disease diagnosis in children [9].
According to the CDC (center for disease control and prevention), the TST induration size will be measured and interpreted after 48–72 h of intra-dermal injection. Any induration greater than or equal to five millimeters among children in close contact with active TB cases is considered positive [10]. A positive test without signs and symptoms of tuberculosis is introduced as latent TB infection (LTB) and should be received prophylactic anti-TB treatment [11]. Note that tuberculosis infection and disease among children can be seen with various signs and symptoms,they are usually misdiagnosed as the other disorders such as pneumonia, viral and bacterial infections, malnutrition and etc., which is one of the main challenges in the TB control system. TB infection and disease is diagnosed based on the history of exposure, clinical signs and symptoms, tuberculin skin test results, chest X ray and confirmation of the mycobacterium tuberculosis in the sputum smear and sputum culture. Due to the limited availability of sputum in younger children, negative sputum smear is one of the most diagnostic barriers in this age group [12], [13].
All required information were collected using the electronic files, interview with the patients and their family members and inspection of the children and active cases within a researcher-made checklist. Interpretation of the tuberculin skin tests and chest X rays as well as physical examinations of the study subjects was performed by trained physicians.
2.3. Statistical analyses
STATA version 14 software was used for data description and analysis. Qualitative and quantitative variables were compared between groups using Chi square and T test/Mann whitney U tests respectively. Investigating the factors associated with the TB infection, was used based on logistic regression models controlling the effect of potential confounders. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3. Results
Totally, during the study period, 25 smear positive pulmonary TB cases whose families included at least one under six year-old children were diagnosed and registered in the study area. That included 13 families from Zabol and 12 families from Nimrooz districts. Most of them were female (72 %). The youngest and oldest TB patients were 21 and 83 years old respectively with mean (SD) age of 55.4 (21.09).
The smear positivity of the patients varied from 5.26 % for 2+ to 50 % for 1+. Most of them had abnormal chest X ray (88 %). Of the study families, 68 % were rural residents. Among patients, 5 (20 %) had history of diabetes mellitus.
Investigating the family members showed that 50 children under six were in close contact with the TB cases, 27 of which were from Zabol and 23 children were from Nimrooz districts. The number of under six year-old children in these families varied between 1 and 7 children. In other words, each patient in average was in house-hold contact with at least 3.04 children under six.
Mean (SD) age of the exposed children was 2.87 (1.56) years varied between three months and 6 years. Of them, 31 (62 %) were female. Mean (SD) TST induration size of the children was 2.7 (2.76) mm 12 (24 %) of which were higher than 5 mm. Zero TST induration size was observed in most of the children (30 %). Just two (4 %) children had abnormal chest X ray.
Frequency of rural residency among children with abnormal TST reaction was significantly lower than that of children with normal TST (25 % vs 78.95 % respectively, p = 0.001).
Frequency of diabetic index cases among children with abnormal TST was significantly higher than that of children with normal TST (58 % vs 10 % respectively, p < 0.001). Moreover, children with abnormal TST results compared to those with normal TST, were living in the families with larger sizes (mean number: 8 ± 2.21 vs 4.16 ± 2.51 respectively, p < 0.001).
No significant difference was observed between children with normal and abnormal TST regarding the frequencies of gender (p = 0.910), sputum smear positivity (p = 0.108), patient’s pulmonary involvement (p = 0.092), cigarette smoking (p = 0.890) and opium addiction (p = 0.398) in the index cases, isolated room for the children (p = 0.495) and for the index case (p = 0.173) within the house, mean age of the index cases (p = 0.460), mean delay time in TB diagnosis (p = 0.082), mean duration of children stay in the house (p = 0.838), mean number of children living in each house (p = 0.134) and mean age of the children (p = 0.083) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Characteristics of the index TB cases and exposed children with normal and abnormal TST results.
| Characteristics of participants | Number of Negative TST (%) | Number of Positive TST (%) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient gender | Male | 12 (31.58) | 4 (33.33) | 0.910 |
| Female | 26 (68.43) | 8 (66.67) | ||
| Smear positivity | 1–9 bacillus | 5 (13.16) | 0 (0) | 0.108 |
| 1+ | 19 (50) | 3 (25) | ||
| 2+ | 2 (5.26) | 2 (16.67) | ||
| 3+ | 12 (31.58) | 7 (58.33) | ||
| Patient’s CXR | Normal | 10 (26.32) | 0 (0) | 0.092 |
| Abnormal | 28 (73.68) | 12 (100) | ||
| Residence area | Urban | 8 (21.05) | 9 (75) | 0.001 |
| Rural | 30 (78.95) | 3 (25) | ||
| History of diabetes | No | 34 (89.47) | 5 (41.67) | <0.001 |
| Yes | 4 (10.53) | 7 (58.33) | ||
| Cigarette smoking | No | 31 (81.58) | 10 (83.33) | 0.890 |
| Yes | 7 (18.42) | 2 (16.67) | ||
| Opium addiction | No | 31 (81.58) | 10 (83.33) | 0.398 |
| Yes | 7 (18.42) | 2 (16.67) | ||
| Children gender | Male | 15 (39.47) | 4 (33.33) | 0.702 |
| Female | 23 (60.53) | 8 (66.67) | ||
| Separate room for children | No | 10 (26.32) | 2 (16.67) | 0.495 |
| Yes | 28 (73.68) | 10 (83.33) | ||
| Separate room for patient | No | 30 (78.95) | 12 (100) | 0.173 |
| Yes | 8 (21.05) | 0 (0) | ||
| Patient’s age(year) | Mean (SD) | 55.97 (19.82) | 60.17 (20.92) | 0.460 |
| Children age (year) | Mean (SD) | 3.09 (1.52) | 2.19 (1.56) | 0.083 |
| Delay in diagnosis(days) | Mean (SD) | 35.29 (29.29) | 46.92 (29.67) | 0.082 |
| Family size(persons) | Mean (SD) | 4.16 (2.51) | 8 (2.21) | <0.001 |
| Number of children in house (persons) | Mean (SD) | 2.89 (2.14) | 1.38 (3.5) | 0.134 |
| Duration of children stay in house(days) | Mean (SD) | 20.10 (5.62) | 20.67 (5.07) | 0.138 |
TST: tuberculin skin test, SD: standard deviation.
Table 2 shows that the odds ratios of children being infected was statistically significant for diabetic indexcase (p = 0.043) and living in contact with more than two members (p = 0.026). Other characteristics of the index and children had no significant associationswith infection transmission.
Table 2.
Adjusted odds ratios for getting infection based on different factors.
| Abnormal TST | Adjusted odds ratio | P-value |
|---|---|---|
| Diabetic index case | 21.48 | 0.043 |
| Family size | 1.76 | 0.026 |
| Living in rural area | 1.36 | 0.808 |
| Delay in TB diagnosis | 0.99 | 0.828 |
| Children age | 0.37 | 0.060 |
| CXR | omitted at multivariable model | |
TST: tuberculin skin test, CXR: chest X-ray, TB: tuberculosis.
4. Discussion
The present study was the first investigation of the TB household contacts in one of the regions with the highest prevalence of tuberculosis in Iran. Although one-forth of the exposed children in this area were infected with TB, fortunately, none of them had evidences of active TB disease. In a prospected cohort study in the central parts of Iran carried out by Aminzadeh et al, two of 23 closed contact children developed active tuberculosis, while in another study conducted by Kontturi in Finland, 34 of 526 children exposed to TB cases showed positive criteria for active disease [2], [14]. Also, a study in Malaysia that examined 2793 children aged 0–14 in close contact with at least one case of TB, the prevalence of active TB was 1.5 % [15]. Lower rate of pathogenicity of tuberculosis among the exposed children in our study area can be due to good care and follow up of TB patients and their families in the PHC system of Iran particularly in the most prevalence areas. However, in contrast to the above mentioned studies, the exposed family members in the current research were retrospectively followed up which may be another reason for the differences in the results.
Investigating the risk factors of TB infection transmission in the present study showed that if a smear positive TB patient was diabetic, the infection can be transferred to the exposed children easier than a non-diabetic index case. Similarly, Skowroński et al [16] and Harris et al [17] reported that because both cellular and humoral immunity are affected during diabetes mellitus, these patients are in a higher risk of developing tuberculosis infection than the general population. They also have higher chance of transmitting the infection to the community.
In the current study, the children in close contact to TB cases in large families had higher risk of getting infection. However, other demographic, behavioral and clinical characteristics of the index cases as well as the exposed children had no effect on the infection transmission. Conversely, Gessner et al showed that the involvement of the upper lobe of the left lung was significantly associated with developing infection in the exposed individuals [18]. Similar to our findings, Lienhardt et al found the family size of the patients as a risk factor for infection transmission, but in contrast to our results, they reported that the duration of coughing, children’s age as well as their nutritional status were also associated with this transmission [19]. In a study carried out by Perez-Velez, the age and duration of being exposed as well as the severity of disease (Smear positivity index) in the index case, were introduced as effective factors of getting infection by the in-contact children [20]. HIV status of the index case was also reported as a risk factor for transmission of the infection in some researches [21]. This factor was also investigated in the current study, but none of the index cases were HIV positive.
Our study was some limitations such as the small sample size leading to limited investigation of all factors associated in the infection transmission such as HIV status of the TB cases. However, we tried to carry out the study in the areas with the most incidence rate of tuberculosis in Iran. In addition, the best method for investigating the close contacts is prospective designs, but our study subjects were retrospectively followed approximately-two years after being exposed with the index cases. However, we know that the highest rate of transmission is the first 2–4 weeks of the anti-TB treatment and it should be noted that all of the index patients in this study received effective treatment immediately after diagnosis.
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, our study emphasizes on preventive measures as the best method for limiting the infection transmission to the household close contacts. According to our results, such preventive measures should be taken into account especially in the large family sizes with TB patients and those who have history of diabetes mellitus.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgment
The researchers would like to thank all those who contributed to the study.
Funding
This study was supported by research deputy of Zabol University of Medical Science (grant No. 011). The funding body played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing or decision to publish this manuscript.
References
- 1.Martinez L., Cords O., Horsburgh C.R., Andrews J.R., Acuna-Villaorduna C., Desai Ahuja S., et al. The risk of tuberculosis in children after close exposure: a systematic review and individual-participant meta-analysis. Lancet. 2020;395(10228):973–984. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30166-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aminzadeh Z., Asl R.T. A six months follow-up on children less than 6 years old in contact with smear positive tuberculosis patients, varamin city, tehran, iran. Int J Prev Med. 2011;2(2):79–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Basu Roy R., Whittaker E., Seddon J.A., Kampmann B. Tuberculosis susceptibility and protection in children. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(3):e96–e108. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30157-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Laghari M., Sulaiman S.A.S., Khan A.H., Talpur B.A., Bhatti Z., Memon N. Contact screening and risk factors for TB among the household contact of children with active TB: a way to find source case and new TB cases. BMC PublicHealth. 2019;19(1):1274. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7597-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Praveen V. Prevalence of LTBI among household contacts of sputum positive TB patients receiving DOTS chemotherapy. Indian J Tuberc. 2020;67(4):459–465. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2020.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zelner J.L., Murray M.B., Becerra M.C., Galea J., Lecca L., Calderon R., et al. Age-specific risks of tuberculosis infection from household and community exposures and opportunities for interventions in a high-burden setting. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180(8):853–861. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.McIntosh AI, Jenkins HE, Horsburgh CR, Jones-López EC, Whalen CC, Gaeddert M, et al. Partitioning the risk of tuberculosis transmission in household contact studies. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Ross JM, Xie Y, Wang Y, Collins JK, Horst C, Doody JB, et al. Estimating the population at high risk for tuberculosis throughhousehold exposure in high-incidence countries: a model-based analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;42:101206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 9.Goel D., Mantan M., Sethi G.R. Mantoux test revisited: Variability in reading tuberculin test in pediatric population. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2018;12(8):625–630. doi: 10.3855/jidc.9601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pahal P, Sharma S. PPD Skin Test. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls PublishingCopyright © 2022, StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2022.
- 11.Lange C., Mandalakas A.M., Kalsdorf B., Denkinger C.M., Sester M. Clinical Application of Interferon-γ Release Assays for the Prevention of Tuberculosis in Countries with Low Incidence. Pathog Immun. 2016;1(2):308–329. doi: 10.20411/pai.v1i2.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mandal N., Anand P.K., Gautam S., Das S., Hussain T. Diagnosis and treatment of paediatric tuberculosis: An insight review. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2017;43(4):466–480. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2016.1262813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Newton S.M., Brent A.J., Anderson S., Whittaker E., Kampmann B. Paediatric tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8(8):498–510. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70182-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kontturi A., Kekomäki S., Ruotsalainen E., Salo E. Tuberculosis contact investigation results among paediatric contacts in low-incidence settings in Finland. Eur J Pediatr. 2021;180(7):2185–2192. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04000-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Azit N.A., Ismail A., Ahmad N., Ismail R., Ishak S. Factors associated with tuberculosis disease among children who are household contacts of tuberculosis cases in an urban setting in Malaysia. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1) doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7814-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Skowroński M., Zozulińska-Ziółkiewicz D., Barinow-Wojewódzki A. Tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus - an underappreciated association. Arch Med Sci. 2014;10(5):1019–1027. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2014.46220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Harries A.D., Kumar A.M.V., Satyanarayana S., Lin Y., Zachariah R., Lönnroth K., et al. Diabetes mellitus and tuberculosis: programmatic management issues. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19(8):879–886. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gessner B.D., Weiss N.S., Nolan C.M. Risk factors for pediatric tuberculosis infection and disease after household exposure to adult index cases in Alaska. J Pediatr. 1998;132(3 Pt 1):509–513. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70029-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lienhardt C, Sillah J, Fielding K, Donkor S, Manneh K, Warndorff D, et al. Risk factors for tuberculosis infection in children in contact with infectious tuberculosis cases in the Gambia, West Africa. Pediatrics. 2003;111(5 Pt 1):e608-14. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 20.Perez-Velez C.M., Marais B.J. Tuberculosis in children. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(4):348–361. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1008049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Paz-Soldán V.A., Alban R.E., Jones C.D., Oberhelman R.A. The provision of and need for social support among adult and pediatric patients with tuberculosis in Lima, Peru: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:290. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
