The gut microbiome: a core regulator of metabolism

Abstract

The human body is inhabited by numerous bacteria, fungi, and viruses, and each part has a unique microbial community structure. The gastrointestinal tract harbors approximately 100 trillion strains comprising more than 1000 bacterial species that maintain symbiotic relationships with the host. The gut microbiota consists mainly of the phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria. Of these, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes constitute 70–90% of the total abundance. Gut microbiota utilize nutrients ingested by the host, interact with other bacterial species, and help maintain healthy homeostasis in the host. In recent years, it has become increasingly clear that a breakdown of the microbial structure and its functions, known as dysbiosis, is associated with the development of allergies, autoimmune diseases, cancers, and arteriosclerosis, among others. Metabolic diseases, such as obesity and diabetes, also have a causal relationship with dysbiosis. The present review provides a brief overview of the general roles of the gut microbiota and their relationship with metabolic disorders.

Physiological role of the gut microbiota

Nutrient metabolism and absorption

Degradation of indigestible polysaccharides

Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are metabolites generated from the fermentation of insoluble dietary fiber and indigestible polysaccharides by the gut microbiota. Linear monovalent carboxylic acids with fewer than six carbons, such as acetate (C2), propionate (C3), and butyrate (C4), are the most abundant SCFAs, with average ratios of ~60%:20%:20%. Total intestinal SCFA concentrations can reach 100 mM (Cummings et al. 1987). Butyrate is the main nutrient source for colonocytes. Acetate has the highest intestinal concentration of all SCFAs. It enters the liver via the portal vein, undergoes oxidation, and is used mainly by hepatocytes. Propionate participates in hepatic gluconeogenesis. These SCFAs maintain the barrier function of the intestinal tract, are bioactive substances in energy metabolism (Morrison and Preston 2016), regulate immunocyte development, and are anti-inflammatory (Louis et al. 2014, Richards et al. 2016). Various pathways are involved in SCFA synthesis (Koh et al. 2016). Acetate is synthesized from pyruvate during glycolysis and by acetogenic bacteria via the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway, which produces acetyl-CoA from CO₂. Acetoacetyl-CoA is converted to butyryl-CoA, which, in turn, is transformed into butyrate. Major butyrate-producing bacterial taxa include the Ruminococcaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Erysipelotrichaceae, and Clostridiaceae of the Firmicutes phylum (Barcenilla et al. 2000, Louis et al. 2004). Clostridium spp. (such as C. butyricum) and Butyrivibrio spp. (such as B. fibrisolvens) also produce butyrate. Acetobacter spp. and Gluconobacter spp. produce acetate (Louis et al. 2014, Knip & Siljander 2016, Koh et al. 2016). SCFAs are interconverted, and 24% of all acetate is converted to butyrate (Boets et al. 2017). Pathways involved in propionate synthesis include the acrylate pathway mediated by lactate metabolism, the succinate pathway mediated by succinate, and the propanediol pathway utilizing deoxy sugars such as fucose and rhamnose (Fig. 1) (Louis & Flint 2017). Akkermansia muciniphila and other species are propionate-producing, mucin-degrading bacteria (Derrien et al. 2004). SCFAs are important not only for energy and glucose metabolism, inflammation, and immune function regulation (Koh et al. 2016) but also for intestinal environment maintenance. For example, butyrate is important for maintaining an anaerobic environment in the intestinal tract and activating PPARγ by promoting mitochondrial β-oxidation in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), maintaining hypoxia for epithelial cells and inhibiting oxygen transfer into the intestinal lumen (Rivera-Chavez et al. 2016, Byndloss et al. 2017). Acetate and propionate produced in the intestine also play an important role in intestinal homeostasis. They induce colonic Treg to protect against experimentally induced colitis (Smith et al. 2013). Another group reported that acetate suppresses intestinal inflammation via G protein-coupled receptor (GPR) 43 signaling expressed on neutrophils (Maslowski et al. 2009). It also enhances intestinal barrier function and contributes to defense against pathogens (Fukuda et al. 2011).

Figure 1.

Short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) biosynthesis pathways.

Bile acids and lipid metabolism

Secondary bile acids are major bacterial metabolites affecting host physiology. Hepatocytes produce cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid from cholesterol. These lipid-soluble bile acids are conjugated to glycine or taurine to form water-soluble bile salts and are stored in the gallbladder and released into the intestine during digestion. Gut bacteria dehydroxylate primary bile salts into secondary bile salts. These bile acids are actively resorbed along the proximal and distal ileum into the hepatic portal circulation. Bacteria also deconjugate certain primary and secondary conjugated bile salts into lipid-soluble bile acids that are passively absorbed into the hepatic portal circulation. Approximately 95% of bile acids delivered to the duodenum are recycled via enterohepatic circulation. Bile acids emulsify and facilitate the absorption of dietary lipids. They are also ligands for bile acid receptors, such as transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5) and farnesoid X receptor (FXR), which regulate energy and cholesterol metabolism and bile acid transporter gene expression (Wahlstrom et al. 2016) (Fig. 2). Deoxycholic acid is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (Yoshimoto et al. 2013) and the inhibition of bacterial overgrowth. Recently, centenarians were found to have a distinct gut microbiome enriched in Parabacteroides merdae, Odoribacter laneus, and Odoribacteraceae. These microbiota synthesize isoallolithocholic acid, which has antibacterial efficacy against Gram-positive bacteria (Sato et al. 2021). Hence, this gut bacteria-derived bile acid might be conducive to human longevity.

Figure 2.

Bile acid metabolism. The microbiota dehydroxylate primary bile acids, such as cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid, to secondary bile acids with 7a-dehydroxylase. Activation of the bile acid receptor FXR suppresses the expression of CYP7A1, a bile acid rate-limiting enzyme, via the induction of small heterodimer partner (SHP) expression in the liver to control bile acid synthesis. In addition, FXR activation in the intestine suppresses CYP7A1 and CYP8B1 expression via the induction of FGF15/19 expression.

Additionally, gut microbiota produces lipids. The genes encoding sphingolipid biosynthesis mediators are distributed mainly in eukaryotes. Nevertheless, certain bacterial species in the Bacteroides phylum also have genes that regulate sphingolipid biosynthesis. Bacteroides fragilis produces α-galactosylceramide, which suppresses intestinal natural killer T (NKT) cell activation (An et al. 2014). Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) present with relatively low fecal Bacteroides sphingolipid concentrations and are negatively correlated with inflammation. The colonization of germ-free (GF) mice by genetically engineered Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, which lacks sphingolipid synthesis, results in intestinal inflammation and altered host ceramide pools (Brown et al. 2019). Thus, sphingolipids produced by Bacteroides might maintain intestinal homeostasis.

Gut bacteria also saturate dietary unsaturated fatty acids. Lactobacillus plantarum enzymatically metabolizes unsaturated fatty acids via catalysts of hydration and catalysts of dehydration to produce hydroxy-, oxo-, and conjugated fatty acids and partially saturated trans-fatty acids (Kishino et al. 2013). Linoleic acid administration activates the arachidonic acid cascade, which induces chronic inflammation in adipose tissue. Lactobacillus salivarius and Lactobacillus gasseri produce 10-hydroxy-cis-12-octadecenoic acid via linoleic acid hydroxylation, which improves obesity, increases GLP-1 secretion, and improves glucose metabolism (Miyamoto et al. 2019). Dietary nutrients are major drivers that determine microbial composition. Plasma lipidomic analysis of GF or colonized mice fed different nutrient compositions revealed that the microbiota have dynamic effects on systemic lipid profiles, and the magnitude of this influence is related to metabolic disorders (Watanabe et al. 2021). Thus, the gut microbiota comprises a regulator of bile acid metabolism, lipid absorption, inflammatory signals via lipid synthesis, and energy metabolism. Therefore, its disruption can cause metabolic disorders through these mechanisms, which will be discussed in more detail later in this article.

Vitamins

Vitamins are either fat soluble (A, D, E, and K) or water soluble (B-complex and C). Fat-soluble vitamins are transported to various tissues and act as signaling molecules and bioactive effectors, whereas water-soluble vitamins act as coenzymes. Vitamin administration alters gut bacteria, increases their biodiversity, and elevates SCFA levels (Pham et al. 2021). However, gut bacteria themselves synthesize vitamins (Steinert et al. 2020).

Humans cannot synthesize any vitamin, except D. Thus, the human vitamin supply depends on diet and gut bacteria. Gut microbiota produce C, K, and B-complex vitamins. Thiele et al. analyzed the microbial genome and assessed the ability of bacteria to synthesize thiamine (B1), riboflavin (B2), niacin (B3), pantothenate (B5), pyridoxine (B6), biotin (B7), folate (B9), and cobalamin (B12). Approximately 40–65% of 256 human commensal bacteria possess a B-complex synthesis pathway (Magnusdottir et al. 2015). Interactions occur between vitamins and gut microbiota, and the former affect microbial community structures (Pham et al. 2021). Vitamin A administration to neonates within 2 days after birth affects the gut bacterial composition in a sex-dependent manner. It increases Bifidobacterium abundance in boys but increases Actinobacteria and A. muciniphila abundance in girls (Huda et al. 2019). Dietary vitamin A intake and plasma concentrations affect the gut bacterial composition (Wu et al. 2011, Li et al. 2017), which could aid in protection against various pathogens (Long et al. 2007, 2011).

Vitamin D also modifies the gut microbial community structure, and supplementation is associated with significant changes in Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes abundances. Veillonellaceae and Oscillospiraceae (Firmicutes) are negatively associated with 25(OH)-D levels and vitamin D supplementation (Bellerba et al. 2021). Vitamin D may protect against IBD by suppressing immunocyte activation, strengthening intestinal barrier functions, and enhancing antibacterial peptide production (Pham et al. 2021). Certain bacterial species regulate vitamin D receptors (VDRs). Wu et al. reported that the probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. plantarum increase VDR in the IECs and protect against colitis in a VDR signaling-dependent manner (Wu et al. 2015). A genome-wide association analysis revealed that variations in VDR affect β-diversity and Parabacteroides abundance (Wang et al. 2016). This evidence suggests that gut microbiota regulate vitamin D signaling and help to maintain intestinal homeostasis.

Amino acid metabolism

Gut microbiota degrade proteins, produce amino acids (AAs), and metabolize the choline and l-carnitine in red meat to trimethylamine (TMA). The latter enters circulation and is metabolized in the liver to trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO). In an animal model, TMAO was found to promote atherosclerosis. Plasma TMAO could increase cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and mortality in a dose-dependent manner (Koeth et al. 2013, Tang et al. 2013, Schiattarella et al. 2017). Wang et al. showed that a structural analog of choline, 3,3-dimethyl-1-butanol (DMB), inhibits microbial TMA production. Oral DMB administration reduces TMAO levels and inhibits choline diet-induced macrophage foam cell formation to suppress the development of arteriosclerosis in apolipoprotein E knockout (KO) mice. Therefore, microbial intervention might help to prevent arteriosclerosis (Wang et al. 2015).

Gut microbiota also metabolize other AAs. Plasma levels of the branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) valine, leucine, and isoleucine are correlated with insulin resistance in diabetic patients (Newgard et al. 2009, Batch et al. 2013, Jang et al. 2016). Pedersen et al. integrated analyses of serum metabolomics and metagenomics and showed that elevated BCAA levels in insulin-resistant individuals are associated with microbiota, which are enriched in BCAA biosynthesis pathways. Prevotella copri and Bacteroides vulgatus are the major BCAA synthesizers. The oral administration of P. copri to mice fed a high-fat diet results in increased serum BCAAs and aggravates glucose intolerance. Thus, BCAAs produced by gut microbiota could contribute to insulin resistance (Pedersen et al. 2016).

The aromatic AAs tyrosine, phenylalanine, and tryptophan are correlated with diabetes risk (Wang et al. 2011, Chen et al. 2016). Bacteria harbor genes encoding mediators of aromatic AA metabolism. Antibiotic administration strongly affects these metabolic pathways. Hence, aromatic AA metabolism by gut microbiota affects the host AA profile (Fujisaka et al. 2018).

Immune function maintenance and protection against pathogens

SCFAs exert various bioactive effects that help maintain the immune system (Shibata et al. 2017). Butyrate is an energy source for IECs and has anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects (den Besten et al. 2013). Butyrate interacts with IECs, induces antimicrobial peptide and cytokine production, inhibits pathogen overgrowth, and strengthens intestinal barrier functions (Raqib et al. 2006, Singh et al. 2014, Shibata et al. 2017). The predominant phylum Firmicutes consists mainly of butyrate-producing Clostridium clusters IV and XIV (Eckburg et al. 2005). Clostridiales bacteria induce regulatory T-cell differentiation in the intestinal mucosa, which helps suppress the immune response (Atarashi et al. 2011). Furusawa et al. reported that butyrate derived from Clostridiales leads to butyrate-enhanced histone H3 acetylation in both the promoter and conserved non-coding sequence regions of Foxp3 (Furusawa et al. 2013), suggesting that butyrate is an epigenetic modifier for Treg induction.

Bifidobacteria are major producers of acetate, which has immunoregulatory effects. Acetate fortifies the gut barrier function against Escherichia coli O157 (Fukuda et al. 2011). Acetate induces apoptosis via neutrophil GPR43 and suppresses colitis in a mouse colorectal cancer model (Maslowski et al. 2009). Acetate also alleviates allergic airway disease (AAD) in a mouse model. The oral administration of a high-fiber diet or acetate to pregnant mice delays the onset of AAD in their offspring, possibly by inducing Tregs via Foxp3 acetylation at its promoter and HDAC9 inhibition (Thorburn et al. 2015). Succinate, produced by neonate intestinal bacteria, promotes gut microbiota maturation by establishing Clostridiales in the intestinal tract, thereby preventing Salmonella and pathogenic E. coli growth (Kim et al. 2017). Thus, certain bacteria suppress immunocyte activation. In contrast, other bacteria can activate certain immunocytes. Atarashi et al. reported that salivary Klebsiella spp. ectopically colonizing the intestine activate the Th1 immune response and exacerbate intestinal inflammation in a mouse IBD model (Atarashi et al. 2017). In rodents, segmented filamentous bacteria strongly induce Th17cells (Atarashi et al. 2015), trigger the production of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-17 and IL-22, and promote antimicrobial peptide production in IECs (Shale et al. 2013). In contrast, some bacteria such as Gordonibacter pamelaeae, Eggerthella lenta, and Raoultibacter massiliensis negatively regulate Th17 cell differentiation by producing the secondary bile acid metabolites 3-oxolithocholic acid (3-oxoLCA) and isolithocholic acid (isoLCA). These bile acids inhibit retinoic acid receptor-related orphan nuclear receptor-γ t (RORγt), a key transcription factor that promotes Th17 cell differentiation. Since 3-oxoLCA and isoLCA levels are reduced in patients with IBD and inversely correlated with Th17 cell/IL-17-related genes, decreased 3-oxoLCA and isoLCA in dysbiosis could contribute to IBD pathophysiology (Paik et al. 2022). In general, Tregs have anti-inflammatory effects, whereas Th17 cells act in a pro-inflammatory manner in IBD, and the Th17/Treg balance is important to maintain intestinal immune homeostasis, with its dysregulation contributing to IBD development (Ueno et al. 2018). Thus, although the mechanisms are complex, it is important to elucidate the interaction between gut commensal bacteria and immunocyte functions.

Regulation of intestinal motility

Intestinal motility is vital to digestion, absorption, and excretion. Gut bacteria regulate intestinal motility by helping to develop and maintain the intestinal nervous system. Intestinal motility is seldom observed in fetuses with little or no intestinal bacteria (Kien 1996). GF mice present with decreased colonic neuron density and intestinal motility compared with those in specific pathogen-free (SPF) mice. Fecal microbiota transplantation promotes serotonin (5-HT) production in the intestinal mucosa and neurons and increases neuron density and motility (De Vadder et al. 2018). Deoxycholic acid produced by spore-forming bacteria enhances 5-HT biosynthesis from colonic enterochromaffin cells and activate platelet functions and intestinal peristalsis (Yano et al. 2015). Obata et al. compared RNA sequencing of the intestinal tracts of conventionally raised mice with GF mice and found a transcription factor, aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), was induced by microbiota. AhR was expressed in colonic neurons and promoted peristalsis of the intestinal tract, indicating a close link between microbiota and the enteric nervous system (Obata et al. 2020). These findings show that intestinal microbiota help to regulate intestinal motility. Therefore, gut dysbiosis can cause chronic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome, which are associated with dysregulated peristalsis. In summary, the gut microbiota play an important role in maintaining systemic homeostasis through the metabolism of nutrients, such as indigestible polysaccharides, lipids, vitamins, and AAs, and regulation of the immune system and intestinal function. In the latter part of this article, we outline the relationship between dysbiosis and obesity/glucose metabolism.

History of GF animals

Next-generation sequencing technologies such as 16S rRNA sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing have been developed to obtain microbial information. Details of these technologies are described in other reviews (Wensel et al. 2022). The transplantation of gut bacteria into GF animals is a powerful tool to investigate the effects of the gut microbiota of interest on biological functions and disease. In this section, we briefly introduce the significance and history of the development of GF animals.

GF animals harbor no detectable microorganisms and can help clarify the roles and significance of the gut microbiota. Gnotobiotic animals are GF and colonized by a single strain or a specific bacterial community comprising various species. They help demonstrate the physiological effects of certain bacteria on the host.

The development of GF animals began in 1885 through the advocacy of Louis Pasteur in France (Pasteur 1885). In 1895, Nuttal and Thierfelder obtained Guinea pigs via aseptic Caesarean section and maintained them in a sterile environment for 13 days (Nuttal & Thierfelder 1985). In 1989, Schottelius et al. created the first reported GF chickens. In the early 1900s, Kuster et al. established GF goats. Later, GF rats, chickens, and guinea pigs were bred as experimental animals.

GF mice were first weaned in 1954 (Reyniers et al. 1946, Reyniers et al. 1949, Miyakawa et al. 1954). The goal of early GF animal research was to determine whether bacterial symbiosis was beneficial or detrimental to the survival of host organisms. GF animal research is used in physiology, nutrition, bacteriology, and immunology. Current microbiota study tools and techniques have revealed close associations between bacteria and metabolic diseases.

However, maintenance of a gnotobiotic status is expensive and requires experienced staff, and the available facilities for GF animals are limited. Further­more, as GF animals have not innately experienced immunological stimulation by microorganisms, their nutritional status and immune systems are quite different from those of SPF animals. Therefore, we should be cautious in interpreting results of such studies.

Gut microbiota in obesity

Obesity is one of the most serious and common medical conditions in modern society. According to World Health Organization data, the obese population is increasing annually. In 2016, 39% of all adults (1.9 billion people) were overweight and 13% of all adults (650 million people) were obese. Obesity causes metabolic disorders, hypertension, glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, and hyperuricemia and is a risk factor for atherosclerosis, ischemic heart disease, and CVD. Therefore, the pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment of obesity merit further investigation. Recent studies have revealed a close relationship between gut microbiota and obesity. The latter alters the gut microbiota, which is in turn closely related to obesity pathogenesis, as it affects host immunity and metabolism. Thus, interventions involving gut microbiota could be used to prevent and treat obesity.

The gut microbiota is inextricably linked to obesity

Bäckhed et al. first found that fecal microbiota transplantation of normal microbiota from the cecum of conventionally raised mice into GF C57/BL6 mice increased fat mass and insulin resistance. The increase in fat storage was not due to an increased food intake but a decreased expression of the fasting-induced adipose factor (Fiaf), a fat accumulation inhibitory factor (Backhed et al. 2004). Several years later, they showed the mechanisms by which GF mice are resistant to obesity compared to conventionally raised mice. They found that (1) GF mice had elevated intestinal Fiaf levels, which activated PGC1α in the skeletal muscle, and (2) AMPK in skeletal muscle is activated in GF mice independently of Fiaf signaling. These two phenotypes can lead to enhanced fatty acid oxidation in GF animals, suggesting that the gut microbiota plays an important role in promoting energy accumulation (Backhed et al. 2007). Subsequently, several studies showed that the transplantation of gut microbiota from obese human or mouse models into GF mice results in obesity (Turnbaugh et al. 2006, Vijay-Kumar et al. 2010, Ridaura et al. 2013). Furthermore, microbial perturbation via antibiotic administration in childhood has been shown to elevate the risk of obesity in adulthood (Cox et al. 2014, Cox & Blaser 2015, Schwartz et al. 2016). This led us to recognize that disruption of the microbiota (dysbiosis) is a cause, and not a consequence, of obesity and is closely associated with metabolic diseases (Le Chatelier et al. 2013). Thus, the gut microbiota is inextricably linked to obesity.

In 2006, it was first shown that gut bacteria differ with obesity. These findings showed a relative increase in the Firmicutes/Bacteroides (F/B) ratio in obese humans and rodents (Ley et al. 2006, Turnbaugh et al. 2006). Since then, numerous studies have reported on the gut microbiota of obese patients to clarify this dysbiosis among various ethnic groups and different geographic regions (Table 1). However, the pattern of microbial structure changes with obesity is not constant, and some reports show no change or a decrease in the F/B ratio (Schwiertz et al. 2010, Tims et al. 2013). Interactions among multiple factors such as race, region, diet, and cultural background might account for these discrepancies. Some human studies have revealed that Oscillospira is reduced with obesity (Konikoff & Gophna 2016, Yang et al. 2021) and is expected to be a candidate for next-generation probiotics as it produces SCFAs such as butyrate. However, several reports showed that this bacterium is associated with gallstones and chronic constipation, suggesting complex interactions between the bacterium and host physiology (Yang et al. 2021). Goodrich et al. analyzed the gut microbiota of 416 pairs of twins and found that the abundance of Christensenellaceae was correlated with low BMI and that the transplantation of Christensenella minuta into GF mice reduces weight gain (Goodrich et al. 2014). Everard et al. showed that the relative abundance of A. muciniphila, which has been linked to a favorable effect on glucose metabolism, is reduced in obese and diabetic mice and humans (Everard et al. 2013). The metabolic ameliorating effects of A. muciniphila are described later in the ‘Impaired gut barrier function’ section.

Table 1.

Characteristics of microbiota associated with obesity among different countries. Characteristics of the microbial composition in obese individuals vary by race and region.

Age	Number	Country	Obese vs normal (excerpted bacteria is shown)		Other phenotype	References
Adults	10 obese/20 lean	Japan	↑Firmicutes ↑Fusobacteria ↑Alistipes ↑Anaerococcus ↑Corpococcus ↑Fusobacterium ↑Parvimonas	↓Bacteroides ↓Desulfovibrio ↓Faecalibacterium ↓Lachnoanaerobaculum ↓Olsenella ↓Faecalibacterium prausnitzii	Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes (B/F) ratio not significant	Andoh et al. (2016)
Adults	20 normal weight/20 obese/9 anorexic	France	↑Lactobacillus (not significant)	↓Bacteroidetes	Firmicutes data are similar in the three categories	Armougom et al. (2009)
Adults	20 obese/20 normal weight	Italy	↑Veillonellaceae ↑Dialister spp.	↓Oscillospira genus	↓a-diversity	Borgo et al. (2013)
Adults	17 obese/25 obese with metabolic syndrome/ 25 healthy	Mexico	↑Faecalibacterium ↑Roseburia ↑Lachnospira ↑Coprococcus ↑Bilophila	↓Erysipelotrichaceae		Chávez-Carbajal et al. (2019)
Adults	3 obese/24 overweight/106 normal weight/7 underweight	Italy	↑Selenomonas ↑Megasphaera ↑Streptococcus ↑Dorea ↑Lachnobacterium ↑Jannaschia ↑Dialister ↑Eubacterium	↓Paraprevotella	Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio not significant	Gallè et al. (2020)
Adults	24 obese/28 overweight/31 normal weight/21 underweight	Saudi Arabia	↑Lentisphaerae			Harakeh et al. (2020)
Adults	1674 subjects	USA	↑Acidaminococcus ↑Megasphaera ↑Catenibacterium ↑Prevotella ↑Streptococcus	↓Oscillospira ↓Cloacibacillus ↓Anaerotruncus ↓Ruminococcus ↓Coprobacillus ↓Eggerthella		Kaplan et al. (2019)
Adults	33 obese/23 non-obese	Japan	↑Blautia hydrogenotorophica ↑Coprococcus catus ↑Eubacterium ventriosum ↑Ruminococcus bromii ↑Ruminococcus obeum	↓Bacteroides ↓Bacteroides faecichinchillae ↓Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron ↓Blautia wexlerae ↓Clostridium bolteae ↓Flavonifractor plautii	↑F/B ratio, ↑Shannon–Wiener index	Kasai et al. (2015)
Adults	167 normal/396 overweight or obese with different BMI history	Finland	↑Roseburia ↑Blautia	↓Rikenellaceae ↓Oscillospira	↓Shannon index	Loftfield et al. (2020)
Adults	52 African American/46 Caucasian American	USA			Bacteroidetes numbers not significant	Mai et al. (2009)
Adults	170 HIV-negative women	South Africa	↑Prevotella			Oduaran et al. (2020)
Adults	531 subjects (132 obese/100 normal weight)	Finland	↑Tissierellacea ↑Blautia	↓Archaea (Methanobrevibacter)	F/B ratio not significant	Org et al. (2017)
Adults	248 subjects (83 obese or overweight/83 normal weight/82 underweight)	Bangladesh	↑Acidaminococcus	↓Oscillospira	↓Chao1 richness, ↓Shannon diversity index	Osborne et al. (2020)
Adults	767 subjects	Japan		↓Alistipes ↓Clostridium XlVb ↓Erysipelotrichaceae incertae sedis ↓Lactobacillus	Blautia hansenii and Blautia producta were negatively associated with changes in VFA	Ozato et al. (2022)
Adults	1001 subjects	Japan	↑Prevotella in men ↑Clostridium sensu stricto, Roseburia ↑Ruminococcus, and Megasphaera in women	↓Blautia and Bifidobacterium in men ↓Blautia, Bifidobacterium, Eggerthella, Sutterella, and Erysipelotrichaceae incertae sedis in women	Blautia was the only microbiota significantly and negatively associated with VFA, regardless of sex	Ozato et al. (2019)
Adults	5 obese/5 surgically treated/5 obese/5 lean	India	↑Bacteroides			Patil et al. (2012)
Adults	599 subjects ( 142 obese/246 overweight/211 normal weight)	USA	↑Bacilli ↑Streptococcaceae ↑Lactobacillaceae	↓Clostridia including Christensenellaceae ↓Clostridiaceae and Dehalobacteriaceae	↓Number of OTUs, ↓Shannon index	Peters et al. (2018)
Adults	32 obese/32 normal weight	Mexico	↑Clostridum leptum ↑Lactobacillus	↓Prevotella ↓Escherichia coli		Radilla-Vazquez et al. (2016)
Adults	60 subjects (25 obese with T2D/25 obese non-diabetic/5 non-obese with T2D/5 control)	Egypt	↑Prevotella ↑Clostridium ↑Faecalibacterium ↑Staphylococcus	↓Akkermansia	↑F/B ratio	Salah et al. (2019)
Adults	33 obese/35 overweight/30 normal weight	Germany	↑Bacteroidetes	↓Bifidobacterium ↓Methanobrevibacter spp. ↓Ruminococcus flavefaciens subgroup	↓F/B ratio	Schwiertz et al. (2010)
Adults	20 twin pairs	Finland			The abundance and diversity of the bacterial groups not significant	Simoes et al. (2013)
Adults	1280 subjects (633 lean non-diabetic/494 obese non-diabetic/153 obese with T2D)	Germany	↑Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron	↓Faecalibacterium prausnitzii		Thingholm et al. (2019)
Adults	20 concordant/20 discordant BMI twin pairs	Netherlands	↑Eubacterium ventriosum, ↑Roseburia intestinalis	↓Oscillospiraguillermondii	B/F ratio not significant	Tims et al. (2013)
Adults	52 obese/52 normal weight	China		↓Clostridium perfringens, ↓Bacteroides		Zuo et al. (2011)
Children	15 obese/13 normal weight	India	↑Fecalibacterium prausntzi			Balamurugan et al. (2010)
Children	25 overweight/7 obese/24 normal weight	Finland	↑Staphylococcus aureus	↓Bifidobacteria		Kalliomaki et al. (2008)
Children	15 obese/15 normal weight	Swiss			No significant quantitative differences	Payne et al. (2011)
Children	138 subjects	Flanders	↑Bacteroides fragilis	↓Staphylococcus		Vael et al. (2011)

More recently, metabolomics has been used to elucidate the effects of metabolites produced by the gut microbiota. In China, a metagenome-wide association analysis and serum metabolomic profiling revealed that the abundance of glutamate-fermenting B. thetaiotaomicron is reduced with obesity and associated with an elevation in serum glutamine (Gln). Bariatric surgery and B. thetaiotaomicron administration decrease Gln levels in mice. Hence, B. thetaiotaomicron affects AA cycling and has anti-obesity effects (Liu et al. 2017). In contrast, other researchers reported that B. thetaiotaomicron upregulates intestinal lipid absorption transporters, promotes hepatic lipid biosynthesis, and causes obesity and impaired glucose tolerance in high-fat diet-fed mice (Cho et al. 2022). Further research is required to identify the mechanism through which gut bacteria help to improve obesity and metabolic disorders.

Obesity treatment alters the gut microbiota

Bariatric surgery is a well-established obesity treatment. It promotes weight loss and improves obesity-related metabolic disorders such as hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia (Courcoulas et al. 2018) by reducing food intake and altering gut hormone and bile acid levels, energy metabolism, and the gut microbiota (Debedat et al. 2019). Several studies have shown that the microbial community structure is altered after bariatric surgery. Nevertheless, the results and conclusions were inconsistent among reports possibly because of differences in study designs, sample sizes, subject races, geography, and diet (Table 2). Ryan et al. demonstrated that the metabolic effects of sleeve gastrectomy are abolished in FXR-disrupted mice, suggesting that FXR signaling contributes to body weight reduction and improvement in glycemic control after bariatric surgery (Ryan et al. 2014). Another group elucidated the mechanism by which Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYBG) improves metabolism in rodents. Specifically, it decreases bile acids and increases glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) via L-cell proliferation. The decrease in bile acids, associated with a decline in Lactobacillus abundance, results in intestinal L-cell proliferation, an increase in GLP-1 secretory capacity, and improvements in glycemic control (Dang et al. 2021). Torsten et al. analyzed 40 pre-RYBG and post-RYBG cases and showed that RYBG improved chronic inflammation but increased proinflammatory Proteobacteria. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and flagellin-specific immunoglobulin A (IgA) were increased, but the total fecal IgA content remained unchanged. Hence, an increase in intestinal IgA after bariatric surgery neutralized immunogenic bacteria and their components, leading to the improved systemic inflammation (Scheithauer et al. 2022). Thus, metabolic improvements mediated by bariatric surgery are mainly associated with changes in incretin secretion and immune activities that are mediated by microbial alterations.

Table 2.

Characteristics of microbiota after bariatric surgery in different countries.

Operation	Number	Country	Major bacterial changes after surgery		Diversity after surgery	References
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass	14	Brazil		↓F/B ratio	↑OTUs richness	Al Assal et al. (2020)
Gastric banding or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass	24	France	↑Butyricimonas virosa , 11 altered after Roux-en-Y and 2 altered after gastric banding		↑Microbial gene richness	Aron-Wisnewsky et al. (2019)
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy	53	China	33 altered after sleeve and 19 altered after Roux-en-Y		↑Richness and evenness	Chen et al. (2020)
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass	24	China	↑Bacteroidetes ↑Bifidobacterium			Chen et al. (2017)
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy	197	France, Switzerland, USA	↑Akkermansia muciniphila		↑Shannon index and gene richness	Farin et al. (2020)
Sleeve gastrectomy	10	Japan	↑Bacteroidetes ↑Fusobacteria		↑Faith PD ↑Chao1 ↑Shannon index	Fukuda et al. (2022)
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass	30	France	↑Bacteroides/Prevotella ↑E. coli	↓Bifidobacterium/ Lactobacillus/ Leuconostoc ↓Pediococcus		Furet et al. (2010)
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy	31	Korea	↑Streptococcus ↑Oscillospira ↑Akkermansia	↓Prevotella ↓Turicibacter ↓Bifidobacterium	↑Observed species	Han et al. (2022)
Sleeve gastrectomy or sleeve with duodenojejunal bypass or gastric banding	44	Japan	↑Bacteroidetes ↑Lactobacillales ↑Enterobacteriales			Kikuchi et al. (2018)
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass	30	France	↑Proteobacteria ↑Bacteroides ↑Escherichia	↓Lactobacillus ↓Dorea ↓Blautia ↓Bifidobacterium	↑Richness	Kong et al. (2013)
Sleeve gastrectomy	23	China			↑α-diversity	Liu et al. (2017)
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy	28	Spain	(Sleeve) ↑Akkermansia ↑Haemophilus (Roux-en-Y) ↑Clostridium ↑Fusobacterium	(Sleeve) ↓Anaerostip ↓Bifidobacterium (Roux-en-Y) ↓Bifidobacterium ↓Collinsella		Sanchez-Alcoholado et al. (2019)
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy	45	Poland	↑Bacteroidetes ↑Bacteroidales ↑Bacteroidia ↑Prevotellaceae ↑Rikenellaceae	↓Firmicutes ↓Clostridiales ↓Clostridia ↓Lachnospiraceae ↓Blautia		Stefura et al. (2022)
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass	40	Netherlands	↑Proteobacteria ↑Akkermansia	↓Roseburia ↓Bacteroides ↓Faecallibacterium	↑α-diversity	Scheithauer et al. (2022)

Gut microbiota and glucose metabolism

Research on the relationships among gut microbiota, diabetes, and obesity has progressed. Gut microbiota differ by nationality and race in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). A metagenomic analysis of a Chinese T2DM cohort conducted by Qin et al. revealed decreased butyrate-producing bacteria, increased methane metabolism and hydrogen sulfide production, and upregulation of the expression of genes regulating oxidative stress resistance (Qin et al. 2012). A shotgun metagenomic analysis conducted by Karlsson et al. on a cohort of 145 European women with a normal status, impaired glucose tolerance, and T2DM characterized compositional and functional alterations in the gut microbiota. They established a random forest model based on the metagenomic data that could be applied to patients with impaired glucose tolerance. However, this model could not be consistently applied to the cohort of Qin et al. (Karlsson et al. 2013). Hence, metagenomic profiles differ between diabetic and healthy individuals and can be a good predictive tool for impaired glucose metabolism, but regional and racial differences in gut microbiota must be considered. There is nonetheless a strong link between microbial dysfunction and impaired glucose metabolism. Moreover, gut dysbiosis is already present at the impaired glucose tolerance stage, even before T2DM onset. A metagenomic analysis conducted by Wu et al. on ~1500 Swedish subjects showed that prediabetes and T2DM are characterized by alterations in the gut microbiota and their functional genes and decreases in the abundance of butyrate-producing bacteria. The authors constructed a machine learning model using a random forest algorithm to distinguish individuals with prediabetes or diabetes and showed that bacterial compositional/functional alterations are associated with insulin resistance at the impaired glucose tolerance stage (Wu et al. 2020). Gut microbiota analysis could help diagnose early-stage glucose intolerance and improve early intervention. Based on these studies, the construction of a machine learning model to predict the development of T2DM in healthy and prediabetic patients has been challenging (Aasmets et al. 2021). However, it could serve as a predictive marker for individual risks of metabolic disorders.

Gut microbiota are also implicated in type 1 diabetes (T1DM). Gavin et al. proteomically analyzed stool samples of patients with T1DM and detected proteins associated with intestinal inflammation, reduced intestinal barrier functions, and changes in gut microbiota even before disease onset (Gavin et al. 2018). Tracking the gut microbiota of children congenitally predisposed to T1DM revealed reduced microbial diversity and transient spikes in Ruminococcus gnavus and Streptococcus infantarius abundance before disease onset (Kostic et al. 2015). A metagenomic analysis of 74 T1DM patients and 296 healthy controls showed microbial differences between groups; P. copri and Eubacterium siraeum were more common in T1DM, whereas Firmicutes and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii were more prevalent in controls. In this study, altered bacterial species and metabolic pathways were associated with host glycemic control (Shilo et al. 2022). Thus, changes in gut microbiota and the ambient environment might be associated with T1DM development. As an immunological mechanism, the commensal gut bacterium Parabacteroides distasonis has an epitope similar to the insulin beta chain, the target protein of the autoimmune response in T1DM. The presence of this bacteria could cause the production of autoimmune antibodies leading to the pathogenesis of T1DM (Girdhar et al. 2022). However, some reports suggest that the microbiota inhibit the development of T1DM. MyD88-KO NOD mice develop T1DM in a GF environment but not in the presence of intestinal bacteria (Wen et al. 2008). Shimokawa et al. reported that Ruminococcus spp. might prevent the onset of T1DM by inducing CD8+ regulatory T cells (Shimokawa et al. 2020), suggesting a close interaction between the microbiota and immune system and the onset of T1DM. This evidence clearly implicates the involvement of microbiota in glucose metabolism. The mechanisms by which microbiota contribute to glucose metabolism are described in the following sections.

Short-chain fatty acids

SCFAs exert their metabolic effects through G protein-coupled fatty acid receptors such as GPR41 and GPR43. GPRs are involved in GLP-1 and peptide YY (PYY) secretion in intestinal L cells (Samuel et al. 2008, Tolhurst et al. 2012) to regulate insulin secretion by stimulating pancreatic β-cells and energy balance (Natarajan & Pluznick 2014, McNelis et al. 2015). Mice lacking these receptors exhibit reduced GLP-1 and PYY secretion after SCFA administration (Psichas et al. 2015, Koh et al. 2016, Brooks et al. 2017). Butyrate enhances thermogenesis in skeletal muscle and brown adipose tissue (BAT), improves glucose metabolism by upregulating PGC-1α, AMPK, and p38 expression (Gao et al. 2009), promotes energy expenditure via GPR41 in sympathetic ganglia, and contributes to in vivo energy homeostasis (Inoue et al. 2012). Kimura et al. also reported that SCFAs regulate energy metabolism by promoting sympathetic activation via GPR41 signaling (Kimura et al. 2011). SCFA-mediated GPR43 activation in adipocytes inhibits insulin signaling by suppressing Akt phosphorylation to reduce fat accumulation (Kimura et al. 2013). This evidence suggests that increasing SCFAs in the body might be metabolically beneficial. In addition to the intake of non-digestible polysaccharides, physical activity (Magzal et al. 2022) and cold stimuli (Ichikawa et al. 2021) are implicated in SCFA production. Prior attempts have been made to ameliorate metabolic diseases using SCFA-related interventions. Emanuel et al. reported that infusions of SCFAs, such as acetate, butyrate, and propionate, into the distal colon increase fasting fat oxidation, resting energy expenditure, and PYY concentrations in men (Canfora et al. 2017).

FXR/TGR5/bile acids

FXR (NR1H4) is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of TFs that senses and regulates bile acid, lipid, and glucose metabolism (Matsubara et al. 2013, Sayin et al. 2013). Gut microbiota regulate FXR signaling by reducing the FXR antagonist muricholic acid (Sayin et al. 2013). Mice lacking FXR signaling exhibit dyslipidemia (Sinal et al. 2000). The FXR agonists 6-ethyl-chenodeoxycholic acid, fexaramine, and GW 4064 and FXR overexpression improve the metabolic profile in a mouse obesity model (Zhang et al. 2006, Cipriani et al. 2010, Fang et al. 2015). In contrast, FXR-KO mice display improvements in metabolic disturbances induced by a high-fat diet (Prawitt et al. 2011) and increased GLP-1 secretion (Trabelsi et al. 2015). Jiang et al. reported that oral administration of the selective high-affinity FXR inhibitor glycine-β-muricholic acid ameliorates obesity, insulin resistance, and fatty liver (Jiang et al. 2015). These conflicting results suggest that FXR plays complex roles in the etiology of metabolic dysfunction and that its effects on metabolism vary in an organ-dependent manner. Future research should aim to clarify the significance of FXR in glucose metabolism.

TGR5 is a membrane-bound or G-protein bile acid-activated receptor (Kawamata et al. 2003). TGR5 expression is ubiquitous in human and rodent tissues and is upregulated in the lungs, liver, gallbladder, spleen, adipose tissue, CNS, and intestine (Duboc et al. 2014). Bile acids stimulate the secretion of intestinal hormones that regulate blood glucose and appetite (Adrian et al. 2012), such as GLP-1 and PYY. The latter is a centrally acting appetite suppressant (Kuhre et al. 2018). Bile acids also affect metabolism via TGR5 receptors in BAT. In mice, bile acid-induced TGR5 activation in BAT increases energy expenditure by inducing the cAMP-dependent thyroid hormone-activating enzyme known as type 2 iodothyronine deiodinase (D2), leading to improved obesity tolerance and metabolic disease. This increase in TGR5-mediated energy expenditure is abolished in D2^−/− mice. The authors also confirmed that bile acid induces D2 expression and elevated oxygen consumption in a TGR-dependent fashion in human skeletal muscle cells. Hence, bile acid-TGR5-cAMP-D2 signaling might be protective against obesity in humans (Watanabe et al. 2006).

In vitro, bile acids could decrease endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, which is increased in obesity and closely related to insulin resistance etiology. ER stress blocks insulin signaling by overactivating c-Jun N-terminal kinase and promoting the serine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 (Ozcan et al. 2004), inducing β-cell dysfunction and diabetes onset. Ozcan et al. reported that taurine-bound ursodeoxycholic acid reduces ER stress in cultured cells and whole animals. The administration of this conjugated bile acid to obese and diabetic mice normalizes hyperglycemia, restores systemic insulin sensitivity, improves fatty liver, and enhances insulin actions in liver, muscle, and adipose tissues (Ozcan et al. 2006). Alterations to the bile acid profile through microbiota modification have been investigated for the improvement of metabolic disorders. Jielong et al. reported that phenolic blueberry extracts increase energy expenditure in BAT and improve hepatic lipid metabolism via TGR5 and FXR. These effects are strongly correlated with bile acid regulation, reduction of the FXR inhibitors TαMCA and TβMCA, and expansion of the gut microbiota, including Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. Antibiotic administration attenuates the aforementioned metabolic effects (Guo et al. 2019).

Chronic antibiotic treatments such as vancomycin or metronidazole change bile acid composition due to a loss of intestinal bacteria harboring bile acid-converting enzymes and resulted in the inhibition of inflammatory secondary bile acids production. Furthermore, the changes in the bile acid composition induced anti-inflammatory TGR5 in the liver. As a result, antibiotic treatment mitigated high-fat diet-induced systemic inflammation in C57BL6 mice. However, these effects were not observed in 129S1 or 129S6 mice. Hence, antibiotic modification of the gut microbiota and changes in bile acid and inflammatory signaling can improve glucose metabolism. However, these effects vary by host genetic background and inflammatory potential (Fujisaka et al. 2016).

Imidazole propionate

Imidazole propionate (ImP) is a histidine (His) metabolite produced by the gut microbiota. A study on 1990 subjects in 3 European countries showed elevated ImP levels in the serum of prediabetic and T2DM patients. Nevertheless, there was no correlation between His consumption and ImP levels, suggesting that the gut microbiota is largely responsible for increases in ImP (Molinaro et al. 2020). ImP exacerbates insulin resistance by activating the mTOR pathway and inhibiting insulin signaling (Koh et al. 2018). Thus, ImP might contribute to metabolic disease progression. Clostridium bolteae, Cenarchaeum symbiosum, and R. gnavus might affect ImP levels. High saturated fatty acid, low fiber, and low unsaturated fatty acid diets are associated with elevated ImP. Furthermore, ImP levels are high in patients with poorly controlled T2DM, and ImP inhibits the action of metformin. The glucose-lowering effect of metformin is abolished in mice pretreated with ImP, via the inhibition of AMPK phosphorylation in a p38γ-dependent manner (Koh et al. 2020). Thus, metabolites produced from AAs by gut microbiota not only modulate insulin signaling but also influence drug action.

Impaired gut barrier function

Dysbiosis causes so-called ‘leaky gut’ syndrome wherein the intestinal barrier function is impaired, with increased permeability, via decreases in intestinal mucus and tight junction protein content in the intestinal epithelium. With increased intestinal permeability, the bacterial cell wall component endotoxin enters circulation and causes hyper-endotoxemia. Endotoxin activates Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4, which in turn promotes chronic inflammation in the adipose tissue and liver and exacerbates obesity-induced insulin resistance (Amar et al. 2008, Gummesson et al. 2011, Lassenius et al. 2011). Impaired barrier functions can be treated by microbial intervention. Amer et al. found that administration of the probiotic Bifidobacterium animalis prevents LPS invasion into circulation and improves the inflammatory and metabolic status of diet-induced obese mice (Amar et al. 2011). In humans, supplementation with the probiotics Bacillus indicus, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus licheniformis, and Bacillus clausii reduces serum endotoxin levels by 42% (McFarlin et al. 2017). Thus, intervention with gut bacteria, to strengthen gut barrier functions, is a novel therapeutic approach.

A. muciniphila is an oval, nonmotile, Gram-negative bacterium of phylum Verrucomicrobia. In 2004, Derrien isolated it from healthy human feces inoculated on media containing mucin as the nutrient source (Derrien et al. 2004). The genus Akkermansia (of A. muciniphila) is derived from that of the Dutch microbial ecologist Antoon Akkermans. In both obese humans and rodents, reductions in A. muciniphila abundance have been reported (Everard et al. 2013, Le Chatelier et al. 2013). By contrast, therapeutic interventions that increase A. muciniphila are associated with improvements in obesity or glucose metabolism. For example, when mice fed a high-fat, high-sucrose diet are treated with polyphenol-rich cranberry extract, the abundance of A. muciniphila is increased, which is associated with improved obesity, insulin resistance, and intestinal inflammation (Anhe et al. 2015). Bofutsushosan is a Chinese herbal medicine that improves insulin resistance by increasing A. muciniphila and improving intestinal barrier functions (Fujisaka et al. 2020). Metformin also modulates the gut microbiota, promotes A. muciniphila growth, and improves glucose metabolism (Shin et al. 2014, de la Cuesta-Zuluaga et al. 2017). Prebiotics such as isomalto-oligosaccharides and red pitaya betacyanin significantly increase A. muciniphila and improve glucose metabolism (Song et al. 2016, Singh et al. 2017). A. muciniphila helps maintain intestinal and mucosal epithelial cell functions and suppresses intestinal inflammation leading to improved metabolism in diabetic and obese patients (Everard et al. 2013, Plovier et al. 2017, Ansaldo et al. 2019). Crala et al. reported that pasteurized A. muciniphila administration decreases body weight in a mouse diet-induced obesity model by increasing systemic energy expenditure and fecal energy excretion (Depommier et al. 2020). In a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial on A. muciniphila in humans, A. muciniphila transplantation improved weight loss, total cholesterol levels, and insulin resistance compared to those with a placebo. Furthermore, pasteurized A. muciniphila had higher efficacy than live A. muciniphila. Hence, A. muciniphila administration might be both a safe and effective treatment (Plovier et al. 2017, Depommier et al. 2019). Kim et al. demonstrated that whereas live A. muciniphila suppresses diet-induced fatty liver (Kim et al. 2020), pasteurized A. muciniphila improves intestinal barrier functions but does not impede the progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (Morrison et al. 2022). These results suggest that live and pasteurized A. muciniphila are beneficial for obesity-related metabolic disorders but have different effects on the host, and further research is required to clarify them.

Gut microbiota and hepatic diseases

The liver receives >70% of its blood flow from the portal vein and is continuously exposed to nutrients and bacteria-related substances from the intestine. Therefore, compositional and functional changes in microbiota play important roles in hepatic disease pathogenesis. A healthy intestinal barrier maintains its function and prevents gut microbiota from reaching the liver. However, when the barrier is impaired by various environmental factors, such as an unbalanced diet, gut bacteria and/or their components can be translocated to the liver. TLRs and pathogen recognition receptors, such as the inflammasome, recognize bacterial antigens and enhance the production of proinflammatory cytokines by activating hepatic macrophages and the immune response (Regnier et al. 2021). Dysbiosis is associated with the pathological conditions of various hepatic diseases such as alcoholic hepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Chronic alcohol intake has been reported to cause dysbiosis and impair intestinal barrier functions in animals and humans (Yan et al. 2011, Mutlu et al. 2012). Enterococcus faecalis is increased in alcoholic hepatitis patients and secretes cytolysin, which causes hepatocyte death and liver injury. In one study, bacteriophages targeting cytolysin-producing E. faecalis abolished ethanol-induced liver damage (Duan et al. 2019). Future research should establish whether this approach improves alcoholic hepatitis in humans.

Loomba et al. assessed hepatic fibrosis severity based on biopsies of 86 American patients with NAFLD. Whole-genome shotgun sequencing of stool samples revealed that advanced hepatic fibrosis is associated with increased Proteobacteria and decreased Firmicutes, Ruminococcus obeum, and Eubacterium rectale abundance (Loomba et al. 2017). In contrast, Boursier et al. showed that the relative abundances of Bacteroides and Ruminococcus were increased and that of Prevotella was decreased in French patients with advanced hepatic fibrosis (Boursier et al. 2016). Race, geographical factors, diet, and patient enrollment criteria also substantially influence gut microbial responses and must be considered. However, changes in gut microbiota can cause hepatic fibrosis. In the future, gut microbiota could be used to predict the risk of hepatic diseases.

Gut microbiota are also implicated in the development of HCC. Deoxycholic acid is increased in obesity-induced gut dysbiosis, induces the senescence-associated secretory phenotype in hepatic stellate cells, and is associated with various proinflammatory and tumor-promoting factors in the liver. These processes promote HCC development in mice exposed to chemical carcinogens (Yoshimoto et al. 2013). Ma et al. demonstrated that hepatic CXCR-positive NKT cells have antitumor efficacy in mouse spontaneous HCC and metastatic liver cancer models. Primary bile acids upregulate, whereas bacteria-derived secondary bile acids downregulate, CXCL16 expression, which in turn induces hepatic NKT cells. Clostridium scindens produces secondary bile acids that inhibit hepatic NKT cells (Ma et al. 2018). These studies demonstrate that the gut microbiota is vital in regulating hepatocarcinogenesis through bile acid signaling.

Conclusions

In recent years, as our understanding of the physiological role of the gut microbiota has advanced, the mechanisms by which its dysfunction can cause metabolic disorders have gained clarity (Fig. 3). Future research should aim to elucidate the complex roles of the gut microbiota in these processes. These discoveries might lead to the application of the gut microbiota and their metabolites for the future treatment of metabolic diseases.

Figure 3.

Mechanisms of dysbiosis-induced impaired glucose metabolism. There are two major mechanisms of impaired glucose metabolism mediated by dysbiosis. One is the disruption of the intestinal barrier function, which causes LPS to enter circulation, inducing chronic inflammation and exacerbating insulin resistance, and the other is the effect of microbial metabolites. Increased branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), imidazole propionate, and decreased short-chain fatty acids, such as butyrate, can affect insulin resistance in various organs, insulin secretion, and energy expenditure.

Declaration of interest

K.T. received lecture fees/grants from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation., MSD K.K., Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Suntory Global Innovation Center Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, and the Mitsubishi Foundation.

Funding

Our lab is supported by grants from the JSPS (Japan Society for the Promotion of Science), KAKENHI grant numbers 17K09821 and 20K08882 to S.F., grants from AMED PRIME (JP18gm6010023h0001) to S.F., grants from AMED-FORCE (JP21gm4010014h0001) to K.T., and grants from the Japan Diabetes Foundation, Research Funding Granted by the President of the University of Toyama, Research Funding Granted by the Japan Society for the Study of Obesity (JASSO) and Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd. and Takeda Science Foundation to S.F. Y.W. received grants from the JSPS (Japan Society for the Promotion of Science) KAKENHI grant numbers 21K20896 and 22K16424, grants from the Lotte Foundation, and the Yakult Bio-Science Foundation.