Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2023 Jan 15;9(1):e12960. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12960

The importance of prenatal diagnosis for the surgical strategy of giant cystic meconium peritonitis: A case report

Gunadi a,, Saskia Prathana a, Verrell Christopher Amadeus a, Ramadhita a, Kristy Iskandar b, Alifah Anggraini c
PMCID: PMC9876943  PMID: 36711283

Abstract

Background

Giant cystic meconium peritonitis (MP) is a relatively rare entity. Prompt surgical treatment is required to manage the underlying etiology and reestablish the continuity of the intestines. Despite perinatal and postoperative care improvements, the overall mortality rate is still relatively high. We reported a giant cystic MP that was recognized using antenatal sonography (US). It was successfully treated with primary anastomosis.

Case presentation

We presented a female newborn with a chief complaint of abdominal mass. The prenatal sonography showed an intraabdominal cyst at the 28th week of gestation. She was born at the gestational age of 38 weeks via vaginal delivery from a primigravid mother without complications, with a birth weight of 3275 g. Elective surgery was performed at the age of eight days, and a calcified 10 cm cyst was revealed along with severe adhesions. The cyst was found to communicate with the ileum located 30 cm proximal from the ileocecal junction. No malrotation and volvulus were found. The cyst and a portion of the ileum were resected, followed by a primary end-to-end anastomosis. Pathologic examination showed necrotic tissue lined with epithelial tissue with microcalcifications containing bilirubin pigments, consistent with cystic MP. The patient has uneventfully discharged on postoperative day 17. The patient has normal growth and development, except for delayed walking, at the last follow-up of two years of age.

Conclusion

Giant cystic MP is a rare disorder that can be detected early using the antenatal US. Our case highlights the importance of early diagnosis for giant cystic MP using the antenatal US leads to prompt surgical treatment and a more favorable prognosis.

Keywords: Challenge in diagnosis, Giant cystic meconium peritonitis, Infant, Prenatal diagnosis, Prompt surgical treatment

Abbreviations: MP, meconium peritonitis; US, sonography; CT, computed tomography; POD, postoperative day; CF, cystic fibrosis; Ref, Reference

1. Background

Meconium peritonitis (MP) is sterile chemical peritonitis due to meconium leakage into the peritoneal cavity caused by antenatal perforation of the intestines. This leads to a secondary inflammatory response [1]. The perforation can translate into bacterial contamination after delivery [2]. Several underlying pathologies have been reported: perforation with obstruction (intestinal atresia, meconium ileus, and volvulus) and perforation without obstruction (perforated appendicitis, vascular insufficiency, and Meckel's diverticulum) [1,3].

MP is classified into three groups: generalized, fibro-adhesive, and cystic. The frequency of MP with pseudocyst is rare, at approximately 1:35,000 live births. Some cases may resolve spontaneously in utero or clinically inapparent at birth [3]. Intraabdominal calcification is a pathognomonic finding detected by plain x-ray or ultrasound (US) [4]. Currently, the survival rate of MP patients has improved to >90% due to an advance in prenatal diagnosis, surgical procedures, and neonatal intensive care, while around the 1950s–1960s, MP was considered a deadly disorder with a mortality rate of >80% [5,6].

It has been suggested that a fetus diagnosed with MP should undergo early surgical treatment to increase the survival rate and prognosis of the patient [4,7]. However, the surgical approach option remains controversial: primary anastomosis or enterostomy depends on many factors [7]. We reported a giant cystic MP that was recognized using antenatal sonography (US). It was successfully treated with primary anastomosis.

2. Case presentation

A female neonate was consulted to our division due to findings consistent with intraabdominal mass. The mother had routine antenatal sonography (US) screenings. The fetus had suspected cystic intraabdominal mass since the third trimester (Fig. 1). She was born at the gestational age of 38 weeks via vaginal delivery from a primigravid mother without complications with a birth weight of 3275 g. She remained in stable condition and was fed until the surgical consultation. It was noted that she passed meconium on her first day of life without any complaints suggesting intestinal obstruction. Physical examination revealed a distended abdomen with a firm, palpable mass at the right of the umbilicus measuring around 10 cm. Babygram showed a dilated small and large bowel (Fig. 2a). The neonate had undergone an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan at four days old. CT scan revealed a cystic mass with calcifications at the right lumbar region, consistent with meconium calcified peritonitis measuring 10 cm (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Antenatal sonography showed a cystic intraabdominal mass.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

(a) A babygram showed a dilated small and large bowel. (b) An abdominal CT scan revealed a cystic mass with calcifications at the right lumbar region consistent with meconium calcified peritonitis measuring 10 cm.

Elective exploratory laparotomy was decided since the baby was stable and laboratory findings were normal, including prothrombin time (PT) (13 s; Reference [Ref]: 14.0–15.8 s), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) (38.3 s; Ref: 31.4–40.8 s), and international normalized ratio (INR) (1.01; Ref: 0.90–1.10). She underwent surgery at the age of 8 days; we selected a transverse supraumbilical approach. Upon entering the abdomen, we found severe bowel adhesions to each other and the peritoneum. After releasing the adhesion, we identified a 10 cm cystic mass that adhered to the surrounding viscera along with the uterus, right fallopian tube, and ovary (Fig. 3). No malrotation and volvulus were found. After meticulous dissection and successful mass mobilization, we found an ileal perforation at the base, located 30 cm proximal from the ileocecal junction. As we found the distal bowel viable, we decided to perform a resection of the perforated ileum segment with primary end-to-end anastomosis. The mass was sent to the Anatomical Pathology Department for analysis. It was found to have an epithelial lining with necrotic tissue and bilirubin fragments, consistent with findings of a meconium cyst (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

A 10 cm cystic mass adhered to the surrounding viscera, uterus, right fallopian tube, and ovary.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Histopathological findings showed an epithelial lining with necrotic tissue and bilirubin fragments, consistent with findings of a meconium cyst.

The neonate was started on oral trophic feedings with breast milk on a postoperative day (POD) 9 after minimal gastric residue and had defecation. The neonate was uneventfully discharged from the Neonatology Unit after achieving full feeds at POD 17. We did not conduct genetic testing for cystic fibrosis (CF). Moreover, the patient has normal growth and development, except for delayed walking, at the last follow-up of two years of age.

3. Discussion and conclusions

Because of the advancement in prenatal diagnosis, surgical techniques, and perinatal care, the survival rate of MP patients has improved to >80% [8]. The pathogenesis of meconium peritonitis is still not well understood. Bowel ischemia due to decreased mesenteric blood flow may lead to mucosal necrosis and bowel obstruction, resulting in the perforation of the intestinal wall. However, ischemia is not the only etiology of MP. Intraluminal and extramural conditions causing obstruction might cause subsequent intestinal wall perforation [5]. Several possible pathogeneses of MP have been proposed, including ischemia in the mesentery, meconium ileus, volvulus, intestinal atresia, and CF [5]. For CF, genetic testing for CFTR mutation was not performed. In addition, the incidence of CF is scarce in the Asian population [5]. It has been proposed that CF patients have a thrombophilic predisposition [9]. Our case had a normal coagulation profile, including PPT, APTT, and INR levels. MP patients might show different backgrounds, clinical manifestations, and etiologies [6]. In addition, a previous study suggested that meconium-related ileum pathology has been included in the surgical intestinal disorders group [10].

Advances in medical imaging technology result in an increased number of antenatal diagnoses of MP by fetus, including US [7], as in our case. Earlier diagnosis of MP by the antenatal US in our case has warned the neonatologist, obstetrician, and pediatric surgeon in our hospital to look for possible complications (such as bacterial peritonitis and septic shock), and prepared the surgical management for the patient since prenatal. In addition, fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a beneficial role in detecting various findings of MP, such as ascites, micro-colorectum, bowel dilatation, and peritoneal calcifications [11]. Unfortunately, fetal MRI is not routinely performed in our hospital yet. Moreover, one study suggested that prenatal diagnosis is important as the first stage of treatment for MP and will determine the surgical option for MP [12].

The US findings of calcification vary from 0% to 94%. The calcification is caused by calcium deposition in the inflamed areas due to peritonitis. A previous report showed that ascites, intraperitoneal calcification, and echogenic bowel in the fetal US are strongly associated with MP. Fetal US shows a 100% specificity; however, only ∼20% sensitivity for the detection of meconium pseudocyst [13]. A postnatal CT scan is helpful to confirm further the calcification that remains undetectable by the US due to the calcification being finely dispersed in the peritoneal cavity. Other US findings of MP are ascites and dilated bowel loops [2]. Although helpful in confirming the calcified meconium peritonitis as in our case, it should be noted that the CT scan has a radiation exposure. Therefore, a CT scan is not recommended unless there is a discrepancy between US and plain radiograph results [14].

The clinical manifestation of MP varies from spontaneous resolved to prompt mortality. It depends on the onset of the perforation and if it continues postnatal [3]. Early diagnosis and subsequent early surgical treatment for neonates have been demonstrated to improve the prognosis of MP patients. Early surgery effectively reduces intraabdominal and systemic inflammation, enhancing the outcomes of severely affected patients. Unfortunately, as of now, there is still no standardized operative procedure for MP [7]. We performed ileum resection with primary end-to-end anastomosis in our patient, which had a favorable outcome following this approach. One study suggested an ileostomy for treating bowel disorders in newborns, including meconium disorders, particularly in extremely low-birthweight and premature babies [15].

Our patient started an oral trophic feeding with breast milk on POD 9. It has been shown that the patients with enteral feeding at POD 8 (8.7 ± 4.1) showed a better outcome than the patients with enteral feeding at POD 6 (9.4 ± 6.0) [7].

Notably, this is only a case report, not case series. These facts should be considered during the interpretation of our findings.

In conclusion, giant cystic MP is a rare disorder that can be detected early using the antenatal US. Our case also highlights the importance of early diagnosis of the disorder by antenatal screening and postnatal confirmation, followed by early surgical treatment. We found that in our case, antenatal diagnosis and prompt surgical treatment are possible before severe clinical deterioration, resulting in the possibility of single-stage surgery to reduce the morbidities and mortality associated with this disorder.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was exempted by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, because of a case report. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's parents for participating in this study.

Authors' contributions

G conceived the study. SP and G drafted the manuscript, and R, VCA, KI, and AA critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. G, SP, R, VCA, KI, and AA facilitated all project-related tasks. All authors have approved the submitted version and have agreed on both to be personally accountable for the author's contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the submission.

Consent for publication

Written and informed consent was taken from the patient's parents for publication of this case report and the associated images.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgements

We thank all staff and nurses involved in the patient's care.

Contributor Information

Gunadi, Email: drgunadi@ugm.ac.id.

Saskia Prathana, Email: saskia.prathana@yahoo.com.

Verrell Christopher Amadeus, Email: verrellc@gmail.com.

Ramadhita, Email: ramadaridesa@yahoo.com.

Kristy Iskandar, Email: kristy.iskandar@ugm.ac.id.

Alifah Anggraini, Email: alifahanggraini@ugm.ac.id.

References

  • 1.Chen C.W., Peng C.C., Hsu C.H., Chang J.H., Lin C.Y., Jim W.T., et al. Value of prenatal diagnosis of meconium peritoneum: comparison of outcomes of prenatal and postnatal diagnosis. Medicine. 2019;98(39):7–10. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chan K.L., Tang M.H.Y., Tse H.Y., Tang R.Y.K., Tam P.K.H. Meconium peritonitis: prenatal diagnosis, postnatal management and outcome. Prenat. Diagn. 2005;25(8):676–682. doi: 10.1002/pd.1221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Malhotra B., Mittal N., Jha A., Mittal N.K. Meconium pseudocyst revisited. Int. J. Contemp. Pediatr. 2019;6(4):1753. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lee Y.C., Chen C.J. Meconium pseudocyst: a classical and successfully treated case. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2009;108(3):247–252. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60059-0. Available from: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nam S.H., Kim S.C., Kim D.Y., Kim A.R., Kim K.S., Pi S.Y., et al. Experience with meconium peritonitis. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2007;42(11):1822–1825. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Uchida K., Koike Y., Matsushita K., Nagano Y., Hashimoto K., Otake K., et al. Meconium peritonitis: prenatal diagnosis of a rare entity and postnatal management. Intractable Rare Dis. Res. 2015;4(2):93–97. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2015.01011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jiang Y., Pan W., Wu W., Wang W., Sun S., Wang J. Can early surgery improve the outcome of patients with meconium peritonitis? A single-center experience over 16 years. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):4–9. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1844-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kitamura R.K., Midulla P., Mirensky T. Meconium peritonitis following intestinal atresia: a case report. J. Pediatr. Surg. Case Rep. 2016;9:9–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Terlizzi V., Sciarrone A., Cook A.C., Botta G., Chiappa E. Extensive myocardial infarction in a fetus with cystic fibrosis and meconium peritonitis. J. Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(8):1826–1828. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.09037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pellegrino C., Molinaro F., Ferrara F., Bindi E., Fusi G., Messina M., Angotti R. Meconium-related ileum in preterm and low birth weight children. Chirurgia. 2019;32(5):236–239. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lu Y., Ai B., Zhang W., Liu H. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging contributes to the diagnosis and treatment of meconium peritonitis. BMC Med. Imag. 2020;20(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12880-020-00453-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Uchida K., Koike Y., Matsushita K., Nagano Y., Hashimoto K., Otake K., Inoue M., Kusunoki M. Meconium peritonitis: prenatal diagnosis of a rare entity and postnatal management. Intractable Rare Dis. Res. 2015;4(2):93–97. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2015.01011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ping L.M., Rajadurai V.S., Saffari S.E., Chandran S. Meconium peritonitis: correlation of antenatal diagnosis and postnatal outcome – an institutional experience over 10 years. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2017;42(1):57–62. doi: 10.1159/000449380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Park H.G., Kim K.S., Choi S.Y., Yu I.K. Diagnostic usefulness of CT in meconium pseudocyst in a newborn: a case report. J. Korean Soc. Radiol. 2014;70(2):159–162. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ferrara F., Angotti R., Burgio A., Di Maggio G., Molinaro F., Messina M. Ileostomy in extremely low birth weight and premature neonates. Minerva Pediatr. 2013;65(4):411–415. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the submission.


Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES