Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2022 Nov 29;173(1-2):21–26. doi: 10.1007/s10354-022-00983-6

Significance of hypergammaglobulinemia in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

Bedeutung einer Hypergammaglobulinämie bei Patienten mit chronischer myelomonozytärer Leukämie

Marie-Therese Zack 1, Klaus Geissler 1,2,
PMCID: PMC9877045  PMID: 36445600

Abstract

Chronic inflammation is often indicated by a relative increase in the gamma globulin fraction in the serum electrophoresis. In a retrospective study, we analyzed the prevalence of relative hypergammaglobulinemia in 60 patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), its potential prognostic impact, and potential correlations with laboratory and molecular features. Relative hypergammaglobulinemia (> 20%) was found in 25/60 (42%) patients. The median survival of patients with relative hypergammaglobulinemia was significantly shorter than in patients without hypergammaglobulinemia (10 vs. 24 months, p = 0.018). There was no difference between the groups regarding leukocyte count, hemoglobin value, and platelet count, but a higher prevalence of NRAS mutations and a lower prevalence of ZRSR2 mutations in patients with hypergammaglobulinemia. Our results show that hypergammaglobulinemia is present in a proportion of CMML patients and that this abnormality is associated with poor overall survival. The role of chronic inflammation in the pathophysiology of CMML needs to be further investigated.

Keywords: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, Hypergammaglobulinemia, Survival, Chronic inflammation, NRAS

Introduction

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare, genotypically and phenotypically heterogenous hematologic malignancy of elderly people with an intrinsic risk to progress and transform into secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML). With regard to the presence of myeloproliferation, CMML was originally subdivided into myeloproliferative disorder (MP-CMML; white blood cell count [WBC] count > 13 × 109/L) versus myelodysplastic syndrome (MD-CMML; WBC count ≤ 13 × 109/L MD-CMML) by the FAB criteria [1, 2]. Since CMML is characterized by features of both MDS and MPN, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of 2002 assigned CMML to the mixed category, MDS/MPN [3]. CMML is further subclassified by WHO into three groups based on blast equivalents (blasts plus promonocytes) in peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) as follows: CMML‑0 if PB < 2% and BM < 5% blast equivalents; CMML‑1 if PB 2–4% or BM 5–9% blast equivalents; and CMML‑2 if PB 5–19% or BM 10–19% blast equivalent, and/or Auer rods are present [4]. CMML patients may have a highly variable outcome, suggesting that several factors can determine the course of disease and the cause of death in these patients [59]. There are a number of established prognostic parameters that have been incorporated into several prognostic models [1021]. In clinical practice, chronic inflammation is often indicated by a relative increase in the gamma globulin fraction of the electrophoresis. The potential contribution of chronic inflammation to the clinical outcome of CMML patients is poorly investigated. Using the database of the Austrian Biodatabase for Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (ABCMML), we analyzed 60 CMML patients in whom serum electrophoresis was available in patient records.

Patients and methods

Patients

Recently, we have shown that the ABCMML may be used as a representative and useful real-life data source for biomedical research [22]. In this database, we retrospectively collected epidemiologic, hematologic, biochemical, clinical, immunophenotypic, cytogenetic, molecular, and biologic data of patients with CMML from different centers. The diagnosis of CMML and leukemic transformation was according to the WHO criteria [2, 3]. Clinical and laboratory routine parameters were obtained from patient records. A detailed central manual retrospective chart review was carried out to ensure data quality before analysis of data from institutions. Due to the fact that CMML may be considered as an evolutionary process from clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) to CMML-related AML [23], and the fact that the distinction between mature and immature monocytic cells, which is required to determine the time of transformation into AML, is notoriously difficult due to the lack of reliable immunophenotypic markers, we found it more appropriate not to exclude the few CMML patients with transformation from our analysis [24].

In 60 CMML patients collected between 01.01.1990 and 31.03.2019, serum electrophoreses was available for analysis. This research was approved by the ethics committee of the City of Vienna on 10 June 2015 (ethics code: 15-059-VK).

Molecular studies

Genomic DNA was isolated from mononuclear cell (MNC) fractions of the blood samples according to standard procedures. The mutational status of CMML-related protein-coding genes was determined by targeted amplicon sequencing using the MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Details of the gene panel, library preparation, and data processing have been reported previously [22]. Only variants with strong clinical significance according to the Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer and VAF ≥ 5% were used for statistical analysis regarding a potential predictive value in various treatment options.

Statistical analysis

The log-rank test was used to determine whether individual parameters were associated with overall survival (OS). OS was defined as the time from sampling to death (uncensored) or last follow-up (censored). Dichotomous variables were compared between different groups with the chi-square test. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare two unmatched groups when continuous variables were nonnormally distributed.

To measure the degree of relationship between protein fractions of serum electrophoresis, Pearson correlation was performed. All results were considered significant at p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS v. 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA); the reported p-values were two-sided. The normal upper limits for gamma globulin, α1, and α2 fractions were 20%, 6%, and 12%, respectively. The normal lower limit for the albumin fraction was 50%.

Results

Characteristics of patients

The baseline characteristics of the 60 patients with CMML are shown in Table 1. In order to make comparisons with other published CMML cohorts possible, the percentages of patients regarding established prognostic parameters are given [17]. As seen in other CMML series, there was a male predominance in study patients and more than half of the patients were aged 70 years or older [17]. More than half (51%) of the study patients had leukocytosis > 13 G/L, which is more frequent as compared to other cohorts, where this proportion is usually below 50%. Two patients in this cohort have already transformed into CMML-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Table 1.

Characteristics of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia patients

Cases
N = 60
Percent
(%)

Age

Evaluable=60

< 70 years 27 45
≥ 70 years 33 55

Sex

Evaluable=60

Male 35 58
Female 25 42

Leukocytes

Evaluable=59

> 13 G/L 32 54
≤ 13 G/L 27 46

Hemoglobin

Evaluable=59

< 10 g/dL 12 20
≥ 10 g/dL 47 80

Platelets

Evaluable=59

< 100 G/L 28 47
≥ 100 G/L 31 53

Peripheral blood blasts

Evaluable=55

Absent 42 76
Present 13 24

Prevalence of hypergammaglobulinemia and other changes in serum electrophoresis in CMML patients

Relative hypergammaglobulinemia (> 20%) was found in 25/60 (42%) patients. A relative decrease of albumin < 50% was seen in 11/58 (19%) patients. The α1 and α2 fractions were increased in 18/60 (30%) and 9/60 (15%) CMML patients, respectively. There was a significant strong negative correlation between gammaglobulinemia and albuminemia (−0.821; p = 0.000), indicating the opposite behavior of these parameters. There was a significant weak negative correlation between gamma globulins and α2 fraction (−0.319; p = 0.017), whereas no significant correlation was observed between gamma globulins and the α1 fraction in the serum electrophoresis (−0.032; p = 0.815).

Impact of relative hypergammaglobulinemia on survival

As shown in Fig. 1, the median survival of patients with relative hypergammaglobulinemia was significantly shorter than in patients without hypergammaglobulinemia (10 vs. 24 months, p = 0.018). Among established prognostic parameters including leukocytosis > 13 G/L, anemia < 10 g/dL, thrombocytopenia < 100 G/L, and the presence of blast cells in peripheral blood, only thrombocytopenia had an adverse impact on survival in the univariate analysis in the study cohort (Table 2). The significant effect of hypergammaglobulinemia in univariate analysis remained in the multivariate analysis in the presence of thrombocytopenia (Table 3).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Kaplan–Meier plots for overall survival in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia patients with and without hypergammaglobulinemia

Table 2.

Univariate analysis of established single prognostic parameters in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

Factors Factor present
Median OS (months)
Factor absent
Median OS (months)
P-value
(Log-rank)
Gamma fraction > 20% 10.0 24.0 0.018
WBC > 13 × G/L 12.0 23.0 0.505
Hb < 10 g/dL 10.0 23.0 0.396
PLT < 100 × G/L 10.0 24.0 0.005
PB blasts present 12.0 12.0 0.633

The log-rank test was used to determine if individual parameters were associated with OS

OS overall survival, WBC white blood cell count, Hb hemoglobin, PLT platelet count, PB peripheral blood

Table 3.

Hazard ratios, confidence intervals, and p-values of Cox regression analyses for survival including hypergammaglobulinemia and thrombocytopenia

Parameter Hazard ratio 95% confidence interval P-value
Gamma fraction > 20% 2.735 1.162–6.440 0.021
PLT < 100 G/L 3.365 1.376–8.229 0.008

PLT platelet count

Laboratory and molecular features in the presence or absence of hypergammaglobulinemia

As shown in Table 4, there was no difference in the groups regarding laboratory parameters including leukocyte counts, hemoglobin values, platelet counts, and circulating blasts. Regarding molecular aberrations, mutations in the NRAS gene were more common in patients with hypergammaglobulinemia, whereas mutations in the ZRSR2 gene were more common in patients without hypergammaglobulinemia (Table 5).

Table 4.

Laboratory features stratified by the presence or absence of hypergammaglobulinemia

All patients
(n = 60)
Hypergamma+
(n = 25)
Hypergamma−
(n = 35)
P-value

Age in years; median (range)

Evaluable = 58

71 (36–91) 72 (36–84) 71 (44–91) 0.970

Sex (Male); n

Evaluable = 58

35 (58%) 14 (56%) 21 (60%) 0.757

Leukocytes G/L; median (range)

Evaluable = 57

14.9 (3–238) 20.8 (3–238) 14.1 (3.8–74) 0.212

Hemoglobin g/dL; median (range)

Evaluable = 57

11.9 (7.6–15.0) 11.9 (7.5–14.8) 11.8 (7.6–15.0) 0.580

Platelets G/L; median (range)

Evaluable = 57

102 (5–1148) 93 (12–695) 107 (5–1148) 0.800

PB blasts %; median (range)

Evaluable = 55

0 (0–57) 0 (0–57) 0 (0–18) 0.330

PB peripheral blood, Hypergamma hypergammaglobulinemia

Table 5.

Molecular features stratified by the presence or absence of hypergammaglobulinemia

Mutated gene
VAF (≥ 5%)
With hypergammaglobulinemia Without hypergammaglobulinemia P-value
NRAS 4/14 (29%) 1/23 (4%) 0.037
KRAS 2/14 (14%) 3/23 (13%) 0.915
CBL 3/14 (21%) 3/23 (13%) 0.502
NF1 0/11 (0%) 4/17 (24%) 0.082
PTPN11 1/14 (7%) 3/23 (13%) 0.575
TET2 8/14 (57%) 20/24 (83%) 0.077
IDH1/2 2/14 (14%) 0/24 (0%) 0.057
ASXL1 4/14 (29%) 10/23 (43%) 0.365
EZH2 0/14 (0%) 4/24 (17%) 0.106
DNMT3A 0/14 (0%) 3/24 (13%) 0.168
SRSF2 5/14 (36%) 8/24 (33%) 0.881
ZRSR2 0/14 (0%) 6/24 (25%) 0.041
U2AF1 1/14 (7%) 2/23 (13%) 0.867
SF3B1 0/14 (0%) 2/24 (8%) 0.267
RUNX1 0/14 (0%) 5/24 (21%) 0.067
TP53 5/14 (36%) 5/20 (25%) 0.500

VAF variant allele frequency

Discussion

Serum electrophoresis is an excellent tool for analyzing the inflammation status in patients. In the early phase of acute inflammation, the α1 and α2 fractions are increased, whereas changes in albumin and the γ fraction are not regularly seen [25]. In the late phase of acute inflammation, the serum albumin starts to decrease and the γ fraction to increase. Chronic inflammatory disorders are characterized by increased gamma globulins and by decreased serum albumin, whereas the α1 and α2 fractions are not altered anymore.

Since serum electrophoresis is not routinely performed in myeloid disorders, it was available in only a subgroup of patients in our ABCMML database. In these patients, we have seen relative polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia in 42%. There was a clear inverse correlation to albumin levels, indicating opposite changes of gamma globulins and albumin in chronic inflammation. In a subgroup of patients, α1 and/or α2 fractions were increased in the electrophoresis, suggesting a persistent acute-phase pattern in these patients.

The mechanism behind hypergammaglobulinemia in CMML patients remains to be determined. Polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia has already been described in previous series of patients with CMML [26]. We have looked for possible correlations of hypergammaglobulinemia with phenotypic and molecular features. Regarding laboratory features including leukocyte count, hemoglobin value, platelet value, and circulating blasts, we could not find any differences in patients with or without hypergammaglobulinemia, indicating that the mechanisms leading to changes in these parameters are different from the mechanism leading to hypergammaglobulinemia. Regarding molecular parameters, we observed an association of hypergammaglobulinemia and molecular aberrations of the NRAS and ZRSFR genes. These findings are unexpected, but have to be considered with caution due to the small number of CMML patients who had molecular analysis. However, in this context, it has to be mentioned that recently, a functional link between molecular aberrations and activation of the inflammasome was reported in a preclinical model [27]. In this mouse model, Kras-driven myeloproliferation was reversed by functional inactivation of NLRP1, a major component of the inflammasome. A similar phenotypic improvement was seen with therapeutic IL‑1 receptor blockade.

Most strikingly, patients with hypergammaglobulinemia had inferior survival as compared to CMML patients without hypergammaglobulinemia. This adverse impact on survival was found in univariate analysis and was retained in the multivariate analysis in the presence of thrombocytopenia, which was the only adverse blood parameter, indicating that the pathophysiologic basis for the two alterations are different. In larger series, all parameters including leukocytosis, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and circulating blast cells are established prognostic parameters. The lack of prognostic impact of these parameters, except thrombocytopenia, is most likely the result of the small patient cohort in this study. Therefore, the prognostic impact of hypergammaglobulinemia in this study deserves even more attention. There is clear evidence in the literature that IL‑6 is one of the main stimulatory factors of IgG production [28, 29]. On the other hand, it has been shown that CMML cells can produce IL‑6 in vitro and stimulate CMML cell growth in an autocrine manner [30]. One attractive hypothesis of our exploratory findings could be that IL‑6 may provide a common basis for hypergammaglobulinemia and the adverse outcome in these patients. This hypothesis must be further explored in future studies.

We are aware of the limitations of our study. For example, most of the information used in this study was derived from retrospective real-world data that were not collected systematically or prospectively. Thus, not every parameter was available in all patients. In addition, data from patient records were obtained over many years and from many different centers. Moreover, the patients included in this study were a relatively heterogenous population regarding the blast cell counts, and there was a lack of molecular data in a significant number of patients. However, real-world data have recently been recognized as an important way to get insights into the routine management and natural history of rare diseases [31]. CMML is a rare disease and adequate patient numbers for a systematic and prospective study are not easy to collect within a limited timeframe. Moreover, the ABCMML provides information derived from molecular as well as from functional studies and therefore allows a more comprehensive view and deeper insight into the complex pathophysiology of this hematologic malignancy [22].

Acknowledgments

Funding

This study was supported by the Gesellschaft zur Erforschung der Biologie und Therapie von Tumorkrankheiten—ABCMML-112015

Author Contribution

MTZ performed administration of the data, collected clinical information, and performed statistical analysis; KG and MTZ wrote the manuscript; KG directed the research and collected, analyzed, and interpreted the data. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Sigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien.

Conflict of interest

M.-T. Zack and K. Geissler declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 1982;51(2):189–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1982.tb08475.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vardiman JW, Harris NL, Brunning RD. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms. Blood. 2002;100(7):2292–2302. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-04-1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009;114(5):937–951. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-209262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(20):2391–2405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Onida F, Kantarjian HM, Smith TL, et al. Prognostic factors and scoring systems in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a retrospective analysis of 213 patients. Blood. 2002;99(3):840–849. doi: 10.1182/blood.V99.3.840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Patnaik MM, Padron E, LaBorde RR, et al. Mayo prognostic model for WHO-defined chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: ASXL1 and spliceosome component mutations and outcomes. Leukemia. 2013;27(7):1504–1510. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Itzykson R, Kosmider O, Renneville A, et al. Prognostic score including gene mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(19):2428–2436. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.3314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Elena C, Gallì A, Such E, et al. Integrating clinical features and genetic lesions in the risk assessment of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood. 2016;128(10):1408–1417. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-05-714030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Machherndl-Spandl S, Jäger E, Barna A, et al. Impact of age on the cumulative risk of transformation in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. Eur J Haematol. 2021;107(2):265–274. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fenaux P, Beuscart R, Lai JL, et al. Prognostic factors in adult chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: an analysis of 107 cases. J Clin Oncol. 1988;6(9):1417–1424. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.9.1417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Germing U, Strupp C, Aivado M, et al. New prognostic parameters for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood. 2002;100(2):731–732. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Storniolo AM, Moloney WC, Rosenthal DS, et al. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 1990;4(11):766–770. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schuler E, Schroeder M, Neukirchen J, et al. Refined medullary blast and white blood cell count based classification of chronic myelomonocytic leukemias. Leuk Res. 2014;38(12):1413–1419. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2014.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tefferi A, Hoagland HC, Therneau TM, et al. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: natural history and prognostic determinants. Mayo Clin Proc. 1989;64(10):1246–1254. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(12)61287-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Worsley A, Oscier DG, Stevens J, et al. Prognostic features of chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia: a modified Bournemouth score gives the best prediction of survival. Br J Haematol. 1988;68(1):17–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1988.tb04173.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Such E, Cervera J, Costa D, et al. Cytogenetic risk stratification in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Haematologica. 2011;96(3):375–383. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2010.030957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Such E, Germing U, Malcovati L, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic scoring system for patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood. 2013;121(15):3005–3015. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-08-452938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wassie EA, Itzykson R, Lasho TL, et al. Molecular and prognostic correlates of cytogenetic abnormalities in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a Mayo Clinic-French Consortium Study. Am J Hematol. 2014;89(12):1111–1115. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Itzykson R, Fenaux P, Bowen D, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of chronic myelomonocytic leukemias in adults: recommendations from the European Hematology Association and the European leukemianet. Hemasphere. 2018;2(6):e150. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Patnaik MM, Itzykson R, Lasho TL, et al. ASXL1 and SETBP1 mutations and their prognostic contribution in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a two-center study of 466 patients. Leukemia. 2014;28(11):2206–2212. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Padron E, Garcia-Manero G, Patnaik MM, et al. An international data set for CMML validates prognostic scoring systems and demonstrates a need for novel prognostication strategies. Blood Cancer J. 2015;5(7):e333. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2015.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Geissler K, Jäger E, Barna A, et al. The Austrian biodatabase for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (ABCMML): a representative and useful real-life data source for further biomedical research. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2019;131(17–18):410–418. doi: 10.1007/s00508-019-1526-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Itzykson R, Solary E. An evolutionary perspective on chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2013;27(7):1441–1450. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Foucar K, Hsi ED, Wang SA, et al. Concordance among hematopathologists in classifying blasts plus promonocytes: a bone marrow pathology group study. Int J Lab Hem. 2020;42(4):418–422. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vavricka SR, Burri E, Beglinger C, et al. Serum protein electrophoresis: an underused but very useful test. Digestion. 2009;79(4):203–210. doi: 10.1159/000212077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fenaux P, Jouet JP, Zandecki M, et al. Chronic and subacute myelomonocytic leukaemia in the adult: a report of 60 cases with special reference to prognostic factors. Br J Haematol. 1987;65(1):101–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1987.tb06142.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hamarsheh S, Osswald L, Saller BS, et al. Oncogenic KrasG12D causes myeloproliferation via NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1659. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15497-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brandt SJ, Bodine DM, Dunbar CE, et al. Dysregulated interleukin 6 expression produces a syndrome resembling Castleman’s disease in mice. J Clin Invest. 1990;86(2):592–599. doi: 10.1172/JCI114749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhao EJ, Cheng CV, Mattman A, et al. Polyclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia: assessment, clinical interpretation, and management. Lancet Haematol. 2021;8(5):e365–75. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00056-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Everson MP, Brown CB, Lilly MB. Interleukin-6 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor are candidate growth factors for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia cells. Blood. 1989;74(5):1472–1476. doi: 10.1182/blood.V74.5.1472.1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Khozin S, Blumenthal GM, Pazdur R. Real-world data for clinical evidence generation in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES