In the published article, there was an error in Figure 4 as published. The draft of measured leaf trait was modified from journal which figure usage was not CC-BY. Therefore, the original modification was not allowed without permission, and the new figure should be provided.
Figure 4.
Morphometrics of leaf, leaflet, seed, and megasporophyll. The number block is the sample size. The ratio is calculated as the length divided by the width. The black and red stars are not significant and significant, respectively, diagnostic traits between Cycas revoluta and Cycas taitungensis. The draft of the measured organ is modified from Li and Keng (1975). Insert. angle, insertion angle; Leaflet num. per side, leaflet number per side; Mega. lateral spine num., megasporophyll lateral spine number; Mega. length, megasporophyll lamina length; Mega. ratio, megasporophyll lamina ratio; Mega. width, megasporophyll lamina width. The part labels a-q are the plant trait corresponding to depiction and Table 2.
There was also an error in the caption for Figure 4 . The updated draft did not modify the figure from Setoguchi et al., 2009. We have corrected Figure 4 and its caption.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.