Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2023 Jan 26;13:1457. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28733-7

Evaluating sea cucumbers as extractive species for benthic bioremediation in mussel farms

Luca Grosso 1,2, Massimo Rampacci 1,3, Davide Pensa 1,2, Alessandra Fianchini 1, Esin Batır 4, İlhan Aydın 5, Laura Ciriminna 6, Pedro M Felix 7,8, Ana Pombo 9, Alessandro Lovatelli 10, Salvatrice Vizzini 6,11, Michele Scardi 1,11, Arnold Rakaj 1,11,
PMCID: PMC9879929  PMID: 36702945

Abstract

Filter-feeding mussels blend suspended particles into faeces and pseudo-faeces enhancing organic matter flows between the water column and the bottom, and strengthening benthic-pelagic coupling. Inside operating farms, high bivalve densities in relatively confined areas result in an elevated rate of organic sinking to the seabed, which may cause a localized impact in the immediate surrounding. Deposit-feeding sea cucumbers are potentially optimal candidates to bioremediate mussel organic waste, due to their ability to process organic-enriched sediments impacted by aquaculture waste. However, although the feasibility of this polyculture has been investigated for a few Indo-Pacific species, little is known about Atlanto-Mediterranean species. Hence, for the first time, in the present study, we conducted a comparative investigation on the suitability of different Mediterranean sea cucumber species, to be reared in Integrated Multitrophic Aquaculture (IMTA) with mussels. A pilot-scale experiment was accomplished operating within a mussel farm where two sea cucumbers species, Holothuria tubulosa and Holothuria polii, were caged beneath the long-line mussel farm of Mytilus galloprovincialis. After four months, H. tubulosa showed high survivorship (94%) and positive somatic growth (6.07%); conversely H. polii showed negative growth (− 25.37%), although 92% of specimens survived. Furthermore, sea cucumber growth was size-dependent. In fact, smaller individuals, independently from the species, grew significantly faster than larger ones. These results evidenced a clear difference in the suitability of the two sea cucumber species for IMTA with M. galloprovincialis, probably due to their different trophic ecology (feeding specialization on different microhabitats, i.e. different sediment layers). Specifically, H. tubulosa seems to be an optimal candidate as extractive species both for polycultures production and waste bioremediation in M. galloprovincialis operating farms.

Subject terms: Ecology, Ecology

Introduction

Mussel farming provides more than 1/3 of EU aquaculture products, being one of the most spatially-extended sea farming productions in Europe1. It is overall considered a sustainable aquaculture industry as mussels are filter-feeders able to feed on suspended organic matter, without additional food supplies2. Their low-feeding requirements make the ecological footprint of mussel aquaculture much lower than that of other cultured species3. Moreover, mussels enhance organic matter flows between the water column and the bottom, and strengthen pelagic-benthic coupling4. In fact, they act as efficient collectors of particulate organic matter2,5,6, promoting its settling on the seabed. This organic biodeposit, although may cause a negative side effect impacting locally benthic communities7, may also represent an additional food source for other species tolerant to organic pollution, such as interface and deposit feeders8. Hence, considering the wide spatial extension of mussel farming, the integration of deposit-feeders as extractive species in these productive systems may act as an innovative and sustainable form of Integrated Multi-trophic Aquaculture (IMTA). IMTA, indeed, is based on the community-like model resulting in circular economy approach: species of different trophic levels are integrated simulating a natural community, in order to encourage nutritional recycling within aquaculture farms by the employment of extractive species able to remove and convert waste and/or uneaten feed in new biomass of commercial value9. In this context, sea cucumbers are among the most promising extractive species. In fact, in Asian countries, these species gain high market values being considered luxury seafood10,11. Moreover, deposit feeding sea cucumbers are able to ingest sediment and organic material1214, playing an important role in material recycling and energy flow in benthic ecosystems15. Hence, they are expected to efficiently process enriched benthic sediments under farms, transforming bacterial, fungal and detrital organic matter into high-market value products16. On this view, the integration of sea cucumber in mussel farms may provide many advantages including increased productions through a more efficient trophic resource utilization, diversification of aquaculture products and minimization of benthic impact and deterioration.

Although sea cucumbers are promising IMTA candidates, the information about their feeding behavior and growth performance in co-culture with mussels are accessible only for a few species. While data are available for the Indo-Pacific Australostichopus mollis (Hutton, 1872)1726, little is known about Atlanto-Mediterranean species16,27. Holothuria tubulosa (Gmelin, 1791) and Holothuria polii (Delle Chiaje, 1824) are sympatric sea cucumbers in Mediterranean benthic communities and important ecosystem engineers with a key role in maintaining biodiversity and health of the sediments in which they inhabit28,29. Furthermore, these sea cucumbers are two of the most valuable species in the Mediterranean Sea, having recently become a new fishing target2834. At these latitudes, sea cucumber fishery has grown rapidly over the last decade, in the face of an increasingly interconnected and globalized market28. As result, their market value has increased exponentially, leading to a rapid decline or even local collapse of natural stocks. This phenomenon has stimulated the development of their aquaculture, through the recent setting up of artificial reproduction and hatchery protocols28,29 and feeding trials3537. In addition, laboratory and pilot-scale studies have already suggested H. tubulosa and H. polii as optimal candidates for IMTA applications, both in co-culture with finfish3841 and sea urchins42. However, to the best of our knowledge,27 was the sole available investigation on co-culture potential of Mediterranean sea cucumber species (H. polii) with mussels.

The present study aimed to expand this basis of knowledge, comparing for the first time the feasibility of Mediterranean sea cucumbers, H. tubulosa and H. polii, as extractive species in an off-shore mussel farm. More specifically, the two sea cucumber species were reared under a mussel farm for four-months to evaluate the suitability of mussel biodeposit as a food source for sea cucumbers. Survivorship and somatic growth were assessed, and size-related growth performance was evaluated by comparing two different size classes (subadults and adults) for each species. The main purpose of this study was, therefore, to evaluate the disposition of these sea cucumber species in IMTA, by understanding the difference in their feeding ecology that allow their coexistence through niche segregation in the many benthic habitats.

Materials and methods

Study area

The study was carried out at Ittimar Soc. Coop. mussel farm, a Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lamarck, 1819) longline submerged productive system. This off-shore farm is located in the south of the Adriatic Sea, Italy (41° 58′ 55′′ N; 15° 23′ 52′′ E), 6 km from the coast (Fig. 1). The bathymetry of the area ranged from 17 to 24 m and soft sediments characterize the seafloor (Well Sorted Fine Sands). The mussel farm consists in 10 longlines spaced 70 m apart, covering a total area of 2.06 km2 (206 ha). Each longline is approximately 2 km long and consists of a backbone rope, supported by buoys and fixed by anchor blocks to the seabed (Fig. 2). Mussels grow up in spat-laden culture rope.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Studied area in the Adriatic Sea in Italy. The yellow dotted line signs the position of operating mussel farm under which the sea cucumber rearing cages were located. Attribution: image ©2022 Google Earth, data SIO/NOAA/U.S.Navy, NGA,GEBCO.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Experimental scheme of Integrated Multitrophic Aquaculture, using Holothuria tubulosa and Holothuria polii as extractive species under a mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) farm.

Sea cucumbers: collection and biometric measures

Specimens of H. tubulosa (N = 200) and H. polii (N = 200) of different sizes were collected by SCUBA (Self-Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus) divers along Apulian coast (Fasano, BR). Sea cucumbers were then transported to the mussel farm inside 500 L tanks with seawater, equipped with oxygen insuffler and dry ice (to maintain low temperature and saturated oxygen level). Once in the mussel farm facility, specimens underwent a fasting period of 48 h in lantern nets, to empty their digestive tracts. After the fasting period, sea cucumbers were sorted from the initial pool and placed for 10 min on a filtering bed, to void water from their respiratory trees42, before being weighed (± 0.01 g accuracy). During the measurement procedure, specimens of H. tubulosa and H. polii were sorted into two size classes (small size: 40–100 g; large size: 100–200 g).

Experimental design and rearing systems

Forty experimental cages (1 m × 0.70 m × 0.40 m, l × w × h), 20 for each sea cucumber species, were built in metal frames covered with 1 cm mesh polyethylene net (Fig. 3). For each species, 10 cages were allocated for small and 10 cages for large sea cucumbers. The initial stocking density was defined in terms of biomass (670 g m−2), to make growth output comparable between H. tubulosa and H. polii, since these species show interspecific differences in terms of allometry and maximal growth43,44.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Sea cucumber experimental cages (a) and cage deployment (b).

Once at the study area, small and large H. tubulosa and H. polii were randomly assigned to two lines of 20 cages, spaced 10 m apart. These culture systems were anchored in parallel to two backbone ropes of mussel farms, following the longline orientation (Fig. 2). Moreover, to avoid the hydrodynamic drift, the cages were fixed by anchors to the seabed and partially submerged into the bottom sediment. This arrangement prevented cage displacement during severe hydrodynamic conditions and maintained sea cucumbers on the sediment below the mussel rearing nets. This pilot-scale co-culture experiment lasted four months, from 6th April to 5th August 2020, during which water temperature ranged from 18 to 26 °C.

The sea cucumber cages were regularly maintained and cleaned up to allow unrestricted biodeposit precipitation within them. Specifically, every month, SCUBA divers monitored and, when necessary, removed mussel shell fragments, fouling organisms, and sediment from the upper side of the cages.

Biometric measurements and data analysis

At the end of the experiment, all rearing cages were recovered, and sea cucumbers biometry was performed after a fasting period of 48 h in lantern nets. For both H. tubulosa and H. polii, the survival of specimens of each size class was recorded by counting the specimens in each culture systems17, and their final wet weight was measured, following the standard protocol described above.

Somatic Growth Rate (SGR), Relative Weight Gain (RWG) and Growth Rate (GR) were then calculated as follows37,41:

  • SGR (% day−1): ((lnWf − lnWi)/t) × 100;

  • RWG (%): (Wf − Wi)/Wi) × 100;

  • GR (g day−1): (Wf − Wi)/t;

  • Survival rate (%) = 100 × (nf/ni);

where Wf and Wi are the final and initial wet weights (g) of sea cucumbers, nf and ni are the final and initial number of small and large sea cucumbers in all the culture systems and t represents time in days of the experiment.

Statistical analysis

Before the analysis, raw data were diagnosed for normality of distribution and homogeneity of variance through a Levene’s test and a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test respectively45. Growth data were then transformed with Box-Cox transformation to improve normality and homogeneity of variances. Transformed data were close to a normal distribution (Kolmogorov–Smirnov p > 0.05) with similar variances (Levene’s p > 0.05). Chi-squared tests were performed to compare the survivorship of the different experimental groups (small and large specimens of H. tubulosa and H. polii) after four months of IMTA with M. galloprovincialis. Furthermore, two-way analysis of variance, ANOVA, was carried out to test the differences in terms of somatic growth rate between the sea cucumber size-classes (small and large specimens) and species (H. tubulosa and H. polii) and the interactions among these experimental groups (Table 2). When significant differences (p < 0.05) were generated in ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were used to evaluate differences among pair-wise means (p < 0.05). Statistical analyses were performed with PAST 3.046.

Table 2.

Two-way ANOVAs, Levene’s statistic and Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K-S) statistic on somatic growth rate (SGR) of sea cucumbers, reared under a mussel farm, between species (Holothuria tubulosa and Holothuria polii), size (small and large) and their interaction [n.s: p > 0.05; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001].

Two-way ANOVA SS MS F p df Levene's statistic p (Levene’s) K-S statistic p (K-S)
Species 4.88 4.88 330.50 8.98E−43 (***) 1 0.68 n.s 0.98 n.s
Size 0.49 0.49 32.94 3.14E−08 (***) 1 0.07 n.s 0.98 n.s
Interaction 0.14 0.14 9.82 0.002 (**) 1
Within 2.69 0.01 182

SS sum of squares, MS mean squares, F F values, p p-values, df degrees of freedom.

Results

At the end of the 4-month experiment, all the rearing cages were found to be well preserved. Indeed, as confirmed by SCUBA divers’ inspections during the experiment, cage setup was maintained and no damage was registered from intense hydrodynamic events. Also, the level of fouling on the upper side of the cages was successfully controlled by SCUBA divers allowing the continuous inflow of organic matter from the mussel farm.

Survival rates

Survival rate in H. tubulosa and H. polii was overall very high, respectively 94% and 92%, with no significant differences between species (Chi-square tests: χ2 = 0.31; p > 0.05). In H. tubulosa, large specimens showed a higher survival rate (100%) than small specimens (90%) (Chi-square tests: χ2 = 4.25; p < 0.05), while no difference (Chi-square tests: χ2 = 0.02; p > 0.05) occurred between-size classes in H. polii (92% for both large and small specimens) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Biometric measurements, growth performances and survival rates of small and large specimens of Holothuria tubulosa and Holothuria polii reared below an off-shore mussel farm over the four-month experiment.

H. tubulosa H. polii
Small Large Small Large
Wi (g) 77.71 ± 2.06a 120.32 ± 2.86b 77.75 ± 2.04 122.64 ± 3.05b
Wf (g) 84.23 ± 2.65a 120.69 ± 2.76b 61.17 ± 1.55c 81.65 ± 2.36a
SGR (% day−1) 0.07 ± 0.02a 0.01 ± 0.02b − 0.20 ± 0.01c − 0.34 ± 0.02d
GR (g day−1) 0.06 ± 0.01a 0.01 ± 0.02b − 0.14 ± 0.01c − 0.34 ± 0.02d
RWG (%) 9.41 ± 2.18a 1.05 ± 1.97b − 20.42 ± 1.26c − 32.79 ± 1.37d
Survivorship (%) 90.00a 100.00b 91.67ab 92.50ab

Wi initial wet weight (g), Wf final wet weight (g), SGR (% day−1) Somatic Growth Rate; GR (g day−1) growth rate, RWG (%) relative weight gain (Means ± SE).

The different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among the experimental diets (two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test for comparisons of Wi, Wf, SGR and RWG; Chi-squared test for comparisons of survivorship).

Growth performances

The results of ANOVA analysis showed significant differences between species and size classes, for somatic growth; also, the interaction between species and size classes were significant for growth parameters (Tables 1, 2). At the end of the four-month experiment, H. tubulosa showed generally a higher mean growth (6.07%) than H. polii, which showed a negative growth (− 25.37%). Comparing the somatic growth performances between size classes, H. tubulosa gained a positive value in both small and large individuals (Fig. 4; Table 1), with small specimens growing faster (9.41%, 0.07% day−1 and 0.06 g day−1 respectively for RWG, SGR and GR) than large specimens (1.05%, 0.01% day−1 and 0.01 g day−1 respectively for RWG, SGR and GR). In H. polii weight loss was registered in both size classes (Fig. 4, Table 1), but with large specimens decreasing more (− 32.79%, − 0.34% day−1 and − 0.34 g day−1 respectively for RWG, SGR and GR) than small specimens (− 20.42%, − 0.20% day−1 and − 14 g day−1 respectively for RWG, SGR and GR) (Fig. 4, Table 1).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Somatic Growth Rate (SGR% day−1) of small and large specimens of Holothuria tubulosa and Holothuria polii reared below an off-shore mussel farm over the four-month experiment.

Discussion

This study evaluated the feasibility of the co-culture between the filter-feeder Mytilus galloprovincialis and two species of deposit-feeder sea cucumbers (Holothuria tubulosa and Holothuria polii). As far as we know, this is the first investigation on co-culture of sympatric European sea cucumbers in association with bivalve productive farms. Bivalves possess a highly efficient filtering apparatus, which enable them to concentrate a large amount of phytoplankton and other suspended particulate matter, rejecting the undigested materials in the form of mucus-bound aggregates47,48. The high nutritional value of the ingested food is reflected in their metabolic wastes, and the mussel predigestion activity has been suggested to improve the nutrient bioavailability for deposit-feeder sea cucumbers18. Moreover, these bio-deposits, covered by a polysaccharide matrix, become largely colonized by bacteria which in turn may represent a high nutritional food source for sea cucumbers.

Survivorship is one of the main indicators of co-culture viability, evidencing potential side effects of co-existence in the same rearing environment and food source suitability in an IMTA system42. The present study evidenced a high survival rate of both sea cucumber species (H. tubulosa and H. polii), reflecting their compatibility with the rearing conditions experienced below an off-shore mussel farm. However, although there were no significant differences among experimental groups except for H. tubulosa, different survivorship trends emerged between species and size classes. Indeed, survival rate of large specimens was higher in H. tubulosa than in H. polii suggesting a different ecological compatibility of the two species with productive conditions experienced. On the other hand, considering the small size class, H. polii achieved a higher survival rate than H. tubulosa. These results may rely on a different predation susceptibly of small specimens of the two sea cucumber species. In fact, H. polii presents a thick body wall that may work as an efficient defense to predators49,50. Conversely, small specimens of H. tubulosa are characterized by a thinner body wall that probably makes them more vulnerable to predation by benthic organisms, such as crabs and sea stars, which were found in sea cucumber rearing cages (authors’ personal observation).

From this four-month experiment did not emerge a significant relationship between survivorship and somatic growth yield. Although survival rates were high regardless of species and size classes, growth performances ended up being significantly different between the size classes and species and from interactions between experimental groups (Table 2). These results could be related to the duration of the experiment; indeed, the sea cucumber are able to thrive without feed for several months. However, when these organisms are exposed to a suboptimal food supply for a long time, the net health outcome is negative, with a clear decrease in body size over time suggesting tissue self-digestion51. Therefore, the final somatic growth results confirmed a different compatibility between sea cucumber species in co-culture with mussels, as already suggested by the survivorship trend. H. tubulosa and H. polii showed opposite values of somatic growth yields. Small and large specimens of H. tubulosa, indeed, increased in weight over the experimental time. In contrast, H. polii specimens of both size classes showed a general weight loss, although reared under the same experimental conditions as H. tubulosa. These findings evidenced that H. polii presents compatibility constraints in co-culture with mussels, while H. tubulosa seems to be a promising extractive species. The difference in growth yields could be related to the different trophic ecology of sea cucumbers. In fact, Ref.52, through a stable isotope investigation, suggested a species-specific feeding traits allowing co-existence through trophic niche segregation. The niche segregation among these sea cucumbers can be explained by the differences in digestive physiology (e.g., in terms of intestinal microbiota) or feeding microhabitat (e.g., different sediment layers). Moreover, Ref.53 evidenced that H. tubulosa and H. polii adopt different feeding strategies to compensate the poor-quality feeding conditions often encountered in the wild. H. tubulosa actively selects organic matter from the surface sediment layer, capturing and retaining with the oral tentacles organic-rich particles5456. This specific feeding strategy may explain the H. tubulosa capacity to efficiently exploit organic-rich mussel biodeposit as food sources. Conversely, H. polii is able to dig into the sediment in order to feed on deeper sediment layers. The burrowing behavior of H. polii may not be compatible with the physico-chemical factors below the mussel farms (e.g., reduced oxygen availability, fine sediment granulometry, excessive organic sedimentation, excessive shell drop, nitrate release17), that potentially affected the growth and survival of this sea cucumber species.

Significant growth performance differences also emerged between size classes of both sea cucumber species. The somatic growth values obtained for small specimens were higher than that for large ones, for both H. tubulosa and H. polii. This matches with the life history traits of echinoderms for which a progressive increase in size after the metamorphosis leads to a consequent variation in food energy allocation. In fact, the allocation is primarily somatic in small specimens and becomes gonadal in large ones, showing a strong relation with animal size and age57. Sea cucumber growth rates should be compared with caution among different studies due to the different species employed, size variations, rearing densities and conditions17. In wild, sea cucumbers are considered slow-growing organisms, since they are ectotherms that show an active regulation of energy allocation in response to the poor food quality and quantity in benthic communities58,59. In fact, in these habitats, sea cucumbers employ more energy for maintaining metabolic activities than for growth60. Conversely, when the food sources do not represent a constraint, such as in aquaculture conditions, the growth performances result significantly higher61. In the present study, the highest growth rates detected in small H. tubulosa resulted comparable with those of other IMTA investigations with bivalves in the Indo-Pacific area. During our four-month experiment, small H. tubulosa showed average SGR and GR respectively of 0.07% day−1 and 0.06 g day−1, with high intra‐specific variations (SGR up to 0.30% day−1 and GR up to 0.14 g day−1) that could be explained by genetic variability62,63. Similar values of GR were obtained in Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka, 1867) co-cultured with scallops (0.09–0.31 g day−1,47) Northern China; for Australostichopus mollis (Hutton, 1872) cultured beneath an operating green-lipped mussel farm (0.06 g day−117) in New Zealand; for Apostichopus californicus (Stimpson, 1857) in polyculture with the Pacific oyster Magallana gigas (0.06–0.16 g day−1, Ref.64 in Canada. In the Mediterranean Sea, the growth rate in IMTA with bivalves were investigated only for H. polii27. This study, which used similar size class sea cucumbers (59 ± 10.7 g) with ours, found a negative growth in this species after a four-month co-culture with mussels and fin-fishes. Conversely, Ref.41, which employed juvenile H. polii (24.6 ± 2.1 g), evidenced positive SGR (0.18–0.2% day−1) during co-culture experiment under fish cages, although high mortality rates were detected in all experimental conditions. For H. tubulosa growth performances were only evaluated in co-culture with fin-fishes38,40 and sea urchins42. Reference38 recorded an SGR of 0.32% day−1 for H. tubulosa, belonging to similar size-class (92.81 ± 2.29 g) than that employed in small size class, after 90 days of rearing below commercial fish cages. In these investigations, the growth rate was higher than our values. However, we obtained higher growth performances than40, who detected a weight decrease in H. tubulosa (171.4 ± 64.3 g) reared in IMTA near marine fish cages. This could be related to the organic matter enrichment which is expected to highly depend on specific IMTA conditions and to the stocking densities. In the present study, the rearing density (670 g m−2) was lower than that in the study by40 (1700 g m−2), but higher than that in Refs.38,41 (respectively of 313 g m−2 and 253 g m−2). Exceeding optimal stocking densities, although it might improve organic matter bioremediation, may compromise sea cucumber somatic growth yield or time to reach the commercial size17. Several studies highlighted that high density could affect growth in aquatic organisms in several aspects, crowding stress (reducing water quality, competition for a limited food supply, social interactions/physical contact, chemical mediation and genetic factors)6568. These factors, individually or together, could have hindered the growth rates of sea cucumbers in our study. Therefore, future investigations on adequate stocking densities for IMTA systems are essential to ensure sea cucumber survival, growth and welfare.

To summarize, the present study highlighted the potential of integrated aquaculture between mussels and sea cucumbers in the Mediterranean Sea. This polyculture is potentially able to increase energy-use efficiency, promoting productivity increase, rearing diversification and adding value to the aquaculture sector, with new commercially important species, and sediment bioremediation. Moreover, this is the first study that compared simultaneously two co-existing sea cucumbers as extractive species in a mussel farm. At the end of the four-month experiment, H. tubulosa and H. polii showed different growth performances when cultured below an offshore mussel farm. This result suggests that these species, although belonging to the same functional group, rely on species-specific feeding behavior which probably allows them to co-exist by segregating their trophic niches.

In conclusion, species that share similar life-history traits and habitat type association do not necessarily converge on feeding and rearing requirements, indeed, this is often the reason for their niche segregation69. Therefore, targeted studies on species ecology are necessary to develop an effective community-like aquaculture and to evaluate the compatibility of species with physico-chemical conditions (hydrodynamics, temperature, oxygen, nitrogen concentration), biochemical composition of potential food sources, aiming at the development of a fully functional bioceonosis within a IMTA farm. Further studies are needed to deeply investigate the ability of sea cucumbers to assimilate mussel waste by means of biochemical tracers such as stable isotopes and fatty acids. Specifically designed experiments must be carried out to assess the potential of Mediterranean sea cucumber species for sediment bioremediation and to define the critical biomass and carrying capacity in mussel farms.

Acknowledgements

This investigation was supported from “Regione Puglia” in the frame of PO FEAMP project (CUP: B18I17000950009) and from funding within the PO FEAMP measure 2.47 project (CUP: J89J19000920005). The authors wish to thank Ittimar Soc. Coop. for allowing access to their mussel farm and their technical support in the field work, and the staff of A.Ge.I. Agricoltura Gestione Ittica S.c.r.l. for their organizational and operational assistance. This work was also supported by FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., within the scope of the project MARE (UIDB/04292/2020) and the Associate Laboratory ARNET (LA/P/0069/2020), A.P. was supported with the Scientific Employment Stimulus—Institutional Call—CEECINST/00051/2018.

Author contributions

L.G.: investigation, statistical analysis, wrote the first draft of the manuscript. M.R.; D.P.: investigation. A.F, E.B., İ.A., L.C., P.F., A.P., A.L., S.V., M.S.: wrote sections of the manuscript, contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version. A.R.: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, resources, writing, project administration, validation and supervision.

Data availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Avdelas L, Avdic-Mravlje E, Borges Marques AC, Cano S, Capelle JJ, Carvalho N, et al. The decline of mussel aquaculture in the European Union: Causes, economic impacts and opportunities. Rev. Aquac. 2021;13:91–118. doi: 10.1111/raq.12465. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tamburini E, Turolla E, Fano EA, Castaldelli G. Sustainability of Mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) farming in the Po River delta, northern Italy, based on a life cycle assessment approach. Sustainability. 2020;12:3814. doi: 10.3390/su12093814. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shumway SE, Davis C, Dwney R, Karney R, Kraeuter J, Parsons J, et al. Shellfish aquaculture-In praise of sustainable economies and environments. J. World Aquacult. Soc. 2003;34:8–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Musella M, Wathsala R, Tavella T, Rampelli S, Barone M, Palladino G, et al. Tissue-scale microbiota of the Mediterranean mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and its relationship with the environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;717:137209. doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2020.137209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Peharda M, Župan I, Bavčević L, Frankić A, Klanjšček T. Growth and condition index of mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis in experimental integrated aquaculture. Aquac. Res. 2007;38:1714–1720. doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2109.2007.01840.X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sarà G, Zenone A, Tomasello A. Growth of Mytilus galloprovincialis (Mollusca, bivalvia) close to fish farms: A case of integrated multi-trophic aquaculture within the Tyrrhenian sea. Hydrobiologia. 2009;636:129–136. doi: 10.1007/S10750-009-9942-2/TABLES/4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Danovaro R, Gambi C, Luna GM, Mirto S. Sustainable impact of mussel farming in the Adriatic Sea (Mediterranean Sea): Evidence from biochemical, microbial and meiofaunal indicators. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2004;49:325–333. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.02.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tancioni L, Caprioli R, Dawood Al-Khafaji AH, Mancini L, Boglione C, Ciccotti E, Cataudella S. Anthropogenic threats to fish of interest in aquaculture: Gonad intersex in a wild population of thinlip grey mullet Liza ramada (Risso, 1827) from a polluted estuary in central Italy. Aquac. Res. 2016;47(5):1670–1674. doi: 10.1111/are.12604. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chary K, Aubin J, Sadoul B, Fiandrino A, Covès D, Callier MD. Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) and sea cucumber (Holothuria scabra): Assessing bioremediation and life-cycle impacts. Aquaculture. 2020;516:734621. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734621. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Purcell SW, Williamson DH, Ngaluafe P. Chinese market prices of beche-de-mer: Implications for fisheries and aquaculture. Mar. Policy. 2018;91:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.02.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Morroni L, Rakaj A, Grosso L, Fianchini A, Pellegrini D, Regoli F. Sea cucumber Holothuria polii (Delle Chiaje, 1823) as new model for embryo bioassays in ecotoxicological studies. Chemosphere. 2020;240:124819. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Uthicke S, Karez R. Sediment patch selectivity in tropical sea cucumbers (Holothuroidea: Aspidochirotida) analysed with multiple choice experiments. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1999;236:69–87. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0981(98)00190-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.MacTavish T, Stenton-Dozey J, Vopel K, Savage C. Deposit-feeding sea cucumbers enhance mineralization and nutrient cycling in organically-enriched coastal sediments. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:1–11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rakaj A, Morroni L, Grosso L, Fianchini A, Pensa D, Pellegrini D, Regoli F. Towards sea cucumbers as a new model in embryo-larval bioassays: Holothuria tubulosa as test species for the assessment of marine pollution. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;787:147593. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147593. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Purcell S, Conand C, Uthicke S, Byrne M. Ecological roles of exploited sea cucumbers. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. 2016;54:367–386. doi: 10.1201/9781315368597-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zamora LN, Yuan X, Carton AG, Slater MJ, Marine L. Role of deposit-feeding sea cucumbers in integrated multitrophic aquaculture: Progress, problems, potential and future challenges. Rev. Aquac. 2016;10:57–74. doi: 10.1111/raq.12147. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Slater MJ, Carton AG. Survivorship and growth of the sea cucumber Australostichopus (Stichopus) mollis (Hutton 1872) in polyculture trials with green-lipped mussel farms. Aquaculture. 2007;272:389–398. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.07.230. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Slater MJ, Carton AG. Effect of sea cucumber (Australostichopus mollis) grazing on coastal sediments impacted by mussel farm deposition. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2009;58:1123–1129. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Slater MJ, Carton AG. Sea cucumber habitat differentiation and site retention as determined by intraspecific stable isotope variation. Aquac. Res. 2010;41:695–702. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02607.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stenton-Dozey J. Finding hidden treasure in aquaculture waste. Water Atmos. 2007;15:9–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Slater MJ, Jeffs AG, Carton AG. The use of the waste from green-lipped mussels as a food source for juvenile sea cucumber, Australostichopus mollis. Aquaculture. 2009;292:219–224. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.04.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stenton-Dozey J, Heath P. A first for New Zealand: Culturing our endemic sea cucumber for overseas markets. Water Atmos. 2009;17:20–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zamora LN, Jeffs AG. Feeding, selection, digestion and absorption of the organic matter from mussel waste by juveniles of the deposit-feeding sea cucumber, Australostichopus mollis. Aquaculture. 2011;317:223–228. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.04.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zamora LN, Jeffs AG. The ability of the deposit-feeding sea cucumber Australostichopus mollis to use natural variation in the biodeposits beneath mussel farms. Aquaculture. 2012;326:116–122. doi: 10.1016/J.AQUACULTURE.2011.11.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zamora LN, Jeffs AG. A Review of the research on the Australasian Sea Cucumber, Australostichopus mollis (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) (Hutton 1872), with emphasis on aquaculture. J. Shellfish Res. 2013;32:613–627. doi: 10.2983/035.032.0301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zamora LN, Jeffs AG. Macronutrient selection, absorption and energy budget of juveniles of the Australasian sea cucumber, Australostichopus mollis, feeding on mussel biodeposits at different temperatures. Aquac. Nutr. 2015;21:162–172. doi: 10.1111/ANU.12144. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chatzivasileiou D, Dimitriou PD, Theodorou J, Kalantzi I, Magiopoulos I, Papageorgiou N, et al. An IMTA in Greece: Co-culture of fish, bivalves, and holothurians. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022;10:776. doi: 10.3390/jmse10060776. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rakaj A, Fianchini A, Boncagni P, Lovatelli A, Scardi M, Cataudella S. Spawning and rearing of Holothuria tubulosa: A new candidate for aquaculture in the Mediterranean region. Aquac. Res. 2018;49:557–568. doi: 10.1111/are.13487. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rakaj A, Fianchini A, Boncagni P, Scardi M, Cataudella S. Artificial reproduction of Holothuria polii: A new candidate for aquaculture. Aquaculture. 2019;498:444–453. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.08.060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.González-Wangüemert M, Aydin M, Conand C. Assessment of sea cucumber populations from the Aegean Sea (Turkey): First insights to sustainable management of new fisheries. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2014;92:87–94. doi: 10.1016/J.OCECOAMAN.2014.02.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.González-Wangüemert M, Valente S, Aydin M. Effects of fishery protection on biometry and genetic structure of two target sea cucumber species from the Mediterranean Sea. Hydrobiologia. 2015;743:65–74. doi: 10.1007/s10750-014-2006-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.González-Wangüemert M, Domínguez-Godino JA, Cánovas F. The fast development of sea cucumber fisheries in the Mediterranean and NE Atlantic waters: From a new marine resource to its over-exploitation. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2018;151:165–177. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.González-Wangüemert M, Godino J. Sea cucumbers as new marine resource in Europe. Front. Mar. Sci. 2016;3:112. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Domínguez-Godino JA, Slater MJ, Hannon C, González-Wangüermert M. A new species for sea cucumber ranching and aquaculture: Breeding and rearing of Holothuria arguinensis. Aquaculture. 2015;438:122–128. doi: 10.1016/J.AQUACULTURE.2015.01.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Günay D, Emiroğlu D, Tolon T, Özden O, Saygi H. Growth and survival rate of Juvenile Sea Cucumbers (Holothuria tubulosa, Gmelin, 1788) at Various Temperatures. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2015;15:533–541. doi: 10.4194/1303-2712-v15_2_41. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tolon T. Effect of salinity on growth and survival of the juvenile sea cucumbers Holothuria tubulosa (Gmelin, 1788) and Holothuria poli (Delle Chiaje, 1923) Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2017;26:3930–3935. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tolon T, Emiroğlu D, Günay D, Hancı B. Effect of stocking density on growth performance of juvenile sea cucumber Holothuria tubulosa (Gmelin, 1788) Aquac. Res. 2017;48:4124–4131. doi: 10.1111/are.13232. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tolon MT, Emiroglu D, Gunay D, Ozgul A. Sea cucumber (Holothuria tubulosa Gmelin, 1790) culture under marine fish net cages for potential use in integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) Indian J. Geol. Mar. Sci. 2017;46:749–756. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Neofitou N, Lolas A, Ballios I, Skordas K, Tziantziou L, Vafidis D. Contribution of sea cucumber Holothuria tubulosa on organic load reduction from fish farming operation. Aquaculture. 2019;501:97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.10.071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sadoul B, Caprioli JP, Barrier-Loiseau C, Cimiterra N, Laugier T, Lagarde F, et al. Aquaculture Is Holothuria tubulosa the golden goose of ecological aquaculture in the Mediterranean Sea? Aquaculture. 2022;554:738149. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cutajar K, Falconer L, Massa-Gallucci A, Cox RE, Schenke L, Bardócz T, et al. Culturing the sea cucumber Holothuria poli in open-water integrated multi-trophic aquaculture at a coastal Mediterranean fish farm. Aquaculture. 2022;550:737881. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737881. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Grosso L, Rakaj A, Fianchini A, Morroni L, Cataudella S, Scardi M. Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) system combining the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus, as primary species, and the sea cucumber Holothuria tubulosa as extractive species. Aquaculture. 2021;534:736268. doi: 10.1016/J.AQUACULTURE.2020.736268. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.González-Wangüemert M, Valente S, Henriques F, Domínguez-Godino JA, Serrão EA. Setting preliminary biometric baselines for new target sea cucumbers species of the NE Atlantic and Mediterranean fisheries. Fish. Res. 2016;179:57–66. doi: 10.1016/J.FISHRES.2016.02.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Aydin M. Biometry, density and the biomass of the commercial sea cucumber population of the Aegean Sea. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2018;19:463–474. doi: 10.4194/1303-2712-v19_6_02. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Whitlock, M. C. & Schluter, D. Analisi Statistica dei Dati Biologici, Zanichelli (2010)
  • 46.Hammer, O. & Harper, D. A. T. PAST PAleontological STatistics Version 3 Reference Manual (University of Oslo, 2013).
  • 47.Zhou Y, Yang H, Liu S, Yuan X, Mao Y, Liu Y, et al. Feeding and growth on bivalve biodeposits by the deposit feeder Stichopus japonicus Selenka (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) co-cultured in lantern nets. Aquaculture. 2006;256:510–520. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.02.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pensa D, Fianchini A, Grosso L, Ventura D, Cataudella S, Scardi M, Rakaj A. Population status, distribution and trophic implications of Pinna nobilis along the South-eastern Italian coast. Npj Biodivers. 2022 doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1425249/v1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Francour P. Predation on holothurians: A literature review. Invert. Bio. 1997;116:52–60. doi: 10.2307/3226924. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mecheta A, Mezali K. A biometric study to determine the economic and nutritional value of sea cucumbers (Holothuroidea: Echinodermata) collected from Algeria’s shallow water areas. Beche-de-mer Inf. Bull. 2019;39:65–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sun J, Hamel JF, Gianasi BL, Graham M, Mercier A. Growth, health and biochemical composition of the sea cucumber Cucumaria frondosa after multi-year holding in effluent waters of land-based salmon culture. Aquac. Environ. Interact. 2020;12:139–151. doi: 10.3354/aei00356. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Boncagni P, Rakaj A, Fianchini A, Vizzini S. Preferential assimilation of seagrass detritus by two coexisting Mediterranean sea cucumbers: Holothuria polii and Holothuria tubulosa. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2019;231:106464. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106464. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rakaj, A., and Fianchini, A. Mediterranean sea cucumbers—Biology, ecology, and exploitation, Chapter. In The World of Sea Cucumbers Challenges, Advances, and Innovations (Mercier, A., Hamel, J.-F, Suhrbier, A. & Pearce, C.) (2023)
  • 54.Massin C, Jangoux M. Observations écologiques sur Holothuria tubulosa, Holothuria poli et Holothuria forskali (Echinodermata, Holothuroidea) et comportement alimentaire de H. tubulosa. Référ. Cah. Biol. Mar. 1976;17:45–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Coulon P, Jangoux M. Feeding rate and sediment reworking by the holothuroid Holothuria tubulosa (Echinodermata) in a Mediterranean seagrass bed off Ischia Island, Italy. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 1993;92:201–204. doi: 10.3354/meps092201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Belbachir, N., Mezali, K. & Soualili, D. L. Selective feeding behaviour in some aspidochirotid holothurians (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) at Stidia, Mostaganem Province, Algeria (2014).
  • 57.Grosso L, Rakaj A, Fianchini A, Tancioni L, Vizzini S, Boudouresque CF, Scardi M. Trophic requirements of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus varies at different life stages: comprehension of species ecology and implications for effective feeding formulations. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022;9:865450. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.865450. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sun ZL, Gao QF, Dong SL, Shin PK, Wang F. Estimates of carbon turnover rates in the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka) using stable isotope analysis: The role of metabolism and growth. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2012;457:101–112. doi: 10.3354/meps09760. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yuan XT, et al. Effects of aestivation on the energy budget of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka) (Echinaodermata: Holothuroidea) Acta. Ecol. Sin. 2007;27:3155–3161. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2032(07)60070-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Liu Y, Dong SL, Tian XL, Wang F, Gao QF. Effects ofdietary sea mud and yellow soil on growth and energybudget of the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicas (Selenka) Aquaculture. 2009;286:266–270. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.09.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Brown NP, Eddy SD. Echinoderm Aquaculture. Wiley; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Qiu T, Zhang L, Zhang T, Bai Y, Yang H. Effect of culture methods on individual variation in the growth of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus within a cohort and family. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2014;32:737–742. doi: 10.1007/S00343-014-3131-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zappes IA, Fabiani A, Sbordoni V, Rakaj A, Palozzi R, Allegrucci G. New data on Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddellii) colonies: A genetic analysis of a top predator from the Ross Sea, Antarctica. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:0182922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Paltzat DL, Pearce CM, Barnes PA, McKinley RS. Growth and production of California sea cucumbers (Parastichopus californicus Stimpson) co-cultured with suspended Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas Thunberg) Aquaculture. 2008;275:124–137. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.12.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dong S, Liang M, Gao Q, Wang F, Dong Y, Tian X. Intra-specific effects of sea cucumber (Apostichopus japonicus) with reference to stocking density and body size. Aquac. Res. 2010;41:1170–1178. doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2109.2009.02404.X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Pei S, Dong S, Wang F, Gao Q, Tian X. Effects of stocking density and body physical contact on growth of sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus. Aquac. Res. 2014;45:629–636. doi: 10.1111/ARE.12004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Xia B, Ren Y, Wang J, Sun Y, Zhang Z. Effects of feeding frequency and density on growth, energy budget and physiological performance of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka) Aquaculture. 2017;466:26–32. doi: 10.1016/J.AQUACULTURE.2016.09.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Domínguez-Godino JA, González-Wangüemert M. Does space matter? Optimizing stocking density of Holothuria arguinensis and Holothuria mammata. Aquac. Res. 2018;49:3107–3115. doi: 10.1111/are.13773. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rugnini L, Rossi C, Antonaroli S, Rakaj A, Bruno L. The influence of light and nutrient starvation on morphology, biomass and lipid content in seven strains of green microalgae as a source of biodiesel. Microorganisms. 2020;8:1254. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8081254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES