Skip to main content
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation logoLink to Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation
. 2023 Jan 22;14:21514593231153827. doi: 10.1177/21514593231153827

Two-Part Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures with Bisection of the Lesser Trochanter: An Irreducible Fracture Pattern

Sun-jun Hu 1, Shi-Min Chang 1,, Shou-chao Du 1, Li-zhi Zhang 1, Wen-feng Xiong 1
PMCID: PMC9880592  PMID: 36712599

Abstract

Objective

To introduce the clinical features of and surgical techniques for a rare type of irreducible pertrochanteric femur fracture pattern with bisection of the lesser trochanter.

Methods

From January 2017 to December 2019, 357 patients with per/intertrochanteric femur fractures underwent surgery by closed reduction and internal fixation, of whom 12 patients were identified with rare preoperative imaging features, the lesser trochanter was almost equally bisected. The main fracture pathoanatomy of these cases included: The anterior fracture line passed along the intertrochanteric line to the medial lesser trochanter and bisected it into 2 equal parts from mid-level of the lesser trochanteric protrusion. The proximal part of the lesser trochanter connected to the head-neck fragment and attached by the psoas major tendon, while the distal part of the lesser trochanter connected to the femoral shaft and attached by the tendon of the iliac muscle. These fractures were irreducible by a closed maneuver and were reduced with limited assistance by some devices, and short intramedullary nails were used for fixation of these fractures.

Results

All patients were followed up for an average of 14.2 ± 2.1 months. Clinical fracture union occurred at an average of 10.8 ± 1.5 weeks, while radiographic union occurred at an average of 12.7 ± 1.2 weeks. No cut out of the helical blade was visible on radiographs. The average Parker-Palmer score was 6.9 ± 1.3 (range, 5-9) at the last follow up, including 8 cases rated as excellent, 2 as good and 2 as fair.

Conclusion

Two-part pertrochanteric femur fractures with bisection of the lesser trochanter have an irreducible fracture pattern with cortical locking and soft tissue incarceration. Soft tissue release and short cephalomedullary nail fixation for this fracture pattern provide stable fixation and allow early exercise. This treatment appears to have excellent outcomes in the short and medium terms.

Keywords: intertrochanteric fractures, lesser trochanter, irreducible, soft-tissue interposition, iliopsoas tendon

Introduction

Intertrochanteric femur fractures are among the most serious causes of mortality and morbidity in elderly people, and early surgical intervention is advocated to reduce hypostatic pneumonia, pressure ulcers or other complications caused by being long-term bedridden as much as possible.1-5 Most intertrochanteric fractures can be reduced by closed manipulation on a fracture table, with longitudinal traction and internal rotation of the extremity.6-8 However, approximately 10% of cases may not be able to be closely reduced through the conventional reduction method.9-13 These cases are defined as irreducible fracture patterns, and some form of open reduction with the insertion of a device is used in these cases.

Two-part intertrochanteric femur fractures with bisection of the lesser trochanter were first reported by Moehring et al,9 with a low incidence among total pertrochanteric fractures. Sharma et al10 reported 4 kinds of irreducible fractures, including a type in which the proximal fragment attached to a lesser trochanter was locked underneath the shaft fragment, bisected lesser trochanter with a locked proximal fragment, a posteromedial fragment overlapped at the fracture site, and a proximal fragment was flexed passively by the underlying lesser trochanter. Other authors have discussed irreducible fracture patterns, and the failure to recognize these patterns may cause serious consequences, leading to prolonged operation time and increased bleeding.11-13

The intertrochanteric fracture with a bisected lesser trochanter had the following pathoanatomical features: the main trochanter fracture line crossed the lesser trochanter and split it into 2 parts almost equally. The proximal portion of the lesser trochanter was a part of the proximal head-neck fragment, attached by the psoas major tendon, and deformed to a flexion-external rotation and valgus position. The distal portion of the lesser trochanter was a part of the distal femur shaft, attached by the iliac muscle tendon, and deformed to a proximal shortening and internal rotation position. The cause of fracture irreducibility was superolateral osseous interlocking and inferiomedial capsulo-ligament-tendon incarceration, repeated closed maneuver may fail and increase iatrogenic injury. The purpose of this study was to present the surgical technique for and the clinical outcome of this case series treated by a limited open incision and short proximal femoral intramedullary nail fixation.

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee with the review board approval number LL-2017-ZRKX-013. From January 2017 to December 2019, 357 pertrochanteric femur fractures were treated in Yangpu Hospital affiliated to Tongji University. Patients with a pathologic fracture, a multiple fracture, and fractures extending 5 cm distal to the inferior border of the lesser trochanter were excluded. Among these patients, 12 cases (3.4%) were identified as having two-part intertrochanteric fractures with bisection of the lesser trochanter, the definition mentioned in the Introduction. Of these 12 cases, 7 were male and 5 were female, with an average age of 64.9 ± 7.6 years (range, 52-77 years). The mean age of the other 345 patients was 83.5 ± 8.2 years (range, 35-102 years). The cause of fracture in 7 cases was a fall in daily life and in the other 5 cases was a low-speed motor vehicle accident. According to the preoperative imaging examination, the fractures were classified as type 3-1A1.2 (two-part simple fracture with the fracture line consistent with the intertrochanteric line) according to the classification of the 2018 edition of the International Society of Internal Fixation/American Society of Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA).14 The details of all patients were retrieved from their files and are presented in Table 1, including general information, assist reduction tools, quality of fracture reduction after operation, follow-up time, etc.

Table 1.

Patients Data.

Gender Ages (Year) Cause of Injury Assistant Tool Implant Type FRQ (4point) TWB (Week) Following up (Month) Clinical Fracture Union (Week) Radiographical Fracture Union (Week) Parker-Palmer Score
1 M 52 Traffic accident Hook, forceps CN 3 4 12 10 12 9
2 M 64 Falling on the ground Hook CN 4 2 16 10 12 6
3 F 57 Falling on the ground Periosteal elevator CN 4 2 14 10 12 9
4 F 60 Traffic accident Hook CN 4 4 18 8 12 7
5 M 62 Traffic accident Hook, periosteal elevator CN 4 2 16 14 16 7
6 M 68 Falling on the ground Hook, periosteal elevator CN 3 2 12 10 12 7
7 F 77 Traffic accident Periosteal elevator CN 3 4 12 12 12 8
8 F 58 Falling on the ground Hook, forceps CN 4 2 13 12 14 7
9 M 78 Falling on the ground Periosteal elevator CN 3 2 12 12 12 7
10 M 64 Falling on the ground Periosteal elevator CN 3 4 14 10 14 5
11 F 72 Traffic accident Hook, periosteal elevator CN 4 4 16 10 12 6
12 M 67 Falling on the ground Hook, periosteal elevator CN 4 4 12 12 12 5

M: male, F: female, CN: cephalomedullary nails, FRQ: fracture reduction quality, TWB: time to partial weight bearing.

Fracture Characteristics

Preoperative X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and three-dimensional CT reconstruction images were used for fracture evaluation (Figure 1). These were simple two-part fractures without comminution. The anterior fracture line passed along the intertrochanteric line to the medial lesser trochanter and bisected it into 2 equal parts from mid-level of the lesser trochanteric protrusion. The proximal part of the lesser trochanter connected to the head-neck fragment and attached by the psoas major tendon, while the distal part of the lesser trochanter connected to the femoral shaft and attached by the tendon of the iliac muscle. The fracture had a typical displacement and overlapping relationship, ie the head-neck fragment was flexed anteriorly and rotated laterally, this displaced the fracture spike (inferior-medial cortical corner) anteriorly through the capsule causing soft-tissue incarceration, and the superior-lateral corner engaged into the femoral shaft to form a bony interlocking. The reason of irreducible by closed maneuver was that superolateral osseous interlocking and inferiomedial capsulo-ligament-tendon incarceration.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic picture to show the features of the pertrochanteric fracture with bisection of lesser trochanter. The upper portion of lesser trochanter was a part of the proximal head-neck fragment, which was attached with the psoas tendon, while the lower portion of lesser trochanter was a part to the distal femur shaft, which was attached with ilioas tendon.

Surgical Technique

Operations were performed by 1 orthopaedic trauma group familiar with the technique of cephalomedullary nailing of the proximal femur. Under spinal anesthesia, all operations were performed on a radiolucent traction table in the supine position. The usual manipulation of closed reduction of the fracture may be tried but usually fails. Therefore, limited open reduction was performed to reduce unnecessary secondary iatrogenic injury, with the injured limb fixed and placed in the natural tension state without traction.

A 3-5 cm long skin incision distal to the tip of the greater trochanter on the lateral thigh was made, which could also be used for insertion of the helical blade or lag screw. After exposure of the subcutaneous tissue, fascia lata, and lateral thigh muscle, the lateral side of the proximal femur was approached. A blunt separation from the anterior surface of the trochanter to the neck was performed, and the surgeon could use his or her finger to palpate the displacement at the fracture site.

Fracture reduction was carried out without traction and assisted by instruments. The technical tips are summarized as follows: ① With lateral rotation of the injured leg, a bone hook was introduced into the fracture site to catch the anterior cortex of the femoral shaft, and then, lateral traction and rotational leverage using a bone hook or periosteal elevator were attempted to release the cortical interlocking at the lateral-superior corner of the head-neck fragment. ② With traction of the leg, tensioned tendons or muscle on the medial side of femoral shaft (iliofemoral ligament, anterior capsule, or iliac muscle), which was considered to hinder reduction, was dissected to release the soft tissue locking and incarceration. ③ The head-neck fragment was retracted laterally, and the fracture was reduced by a bone hook. Then, 1 or 2 K-pins were inserted transversely or along the head-neck axis to temporarily hold the fracture. ④ After satisfactory reduction of the fracture, internal rotation and adduction of the limb could be performed, which facilitated cephalomedullary nailing, as described in detail in the manufacturer’s instructions. The K-pins could be removed when they interfered with nail insertion. The implant used is this case series was short proximal femoral intramedullary nails produced by Double Medical Technology Inc. from China.

Postoperative Management and Follow Up

All cases were encouraged to perform muscle isometric exercise and stand up on bed on the first postoperative day and were permitted to get out of bed with weight bearing as tolerated, at least 2 weeks after operation.

Patients were reviewed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the operation, with clinical and radiographic assessments of the progress of healing and complications. Occurrences of internal fixation failure, including coxa vara deformity, refracture, cut out of the blade or penetration of the femoral head, and screw breakage, were recorded. The quality of fracture reduction (reduction score) and postoperative fracture stability (stability score) was assessed by the criterion proposed by Chang et al15,16 according to the AP view and lateral view of X-ray images. The Parker Palmer walking ability score was calculated at the last follow-up.

Results

All patients were followed up for an average of 14.2 ± 2.1 months (range, 12-18 months). With the assistance of brace, partial weight bearing was encouraged at an average of 3.0 ± 1.0 weeks (range, 2-4 weeks). Clinical fracture union, which was implied by the absence of local tenderness on palpation or motion of the injured hip joint, occurred at an average of 10.8 ± 1.5 weeks (range, 8-14 weeks). Radiographic union, as evidenced by bony trabeculae crossing the fracture interspace, occurred at an average of 12.7 ± 1.2 weeks (range, 12-16 weeks). All cases of fracture had healed with no loss of position by the 6-months or 12-months check-up. No patients had any evidence of AVN of the femoral head according to clinical assessment and radiographs by final follow up. No cut out of the helical blade was visible on radiographs. There were 3 cases with helical blade migration and sliding laterally. One case had developed delayed DVT 6 months after operation, which was improved after conservative treatment.

According to the criterion proposed by Chang et al.16 (Table S1), the quality of fracture reduction was assessed using X-ray images taken immediately after the operation. Seven cases were assessed with a score of 4, and 5 cases were assessed with a score of 3. Seven cases were assessed with a stability score of 8 (excellent), and 5 cases assessed with stability score of 7 (good). The Parker Palmer walking function score17 was used to evaluate the outcome of surgery. The average Parker-Palmer score was 6.9 ± 1.3 (range, 5-9) 1 years postoperatively, including 8 cases rated as excellent, 2 as good and 2 as fair. Images of typical cases are shown in Figures 2 and 3.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Illustrative case with radiographic images (A) An intertrochanteric fracture with bisection of lesser trochanter on preoperative X-ray image; (B) Coronal plane on CT scan showed bony interlocking in the lateral superior conner (arrow); (C) The posterior cortex of the femoral neck was structurally intact (arrow). Head-neck fragment lateral rotated by traction of abductor on CT image; (D) 3D-CT reconstruction image of the fracture; (E) Mimics simulated fracture reduction and showed that the lesser trochanter was divided into 2 parts; (F) CT reconstruction showed that the psoas major tendon attached to the medial protrusion of head-neck fragment; G: Intraoperative reduction and maintenance of the fracture by use of a hook; (H-I) AP view and medial view of X-ray images 2 weeks after operation; (J) Front view on postoperative 3D-CT images; (K) Medial view on postoperative 3D-CT images. ★Upper part of lesser trochanter departed from head-neck fragment by traction of psoas major; (L-M): AP view and medial view of X-ray images 1 year after operation.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Illustrative case 2 with radiographic images (A) AP view of X-ray image of an intertrochanteric fracture with bisection of lesser trochanter; (B) Coronal image of CT scan; (C) 3D-CT reconstruction image; (D) Mimics simulated fracture reduction; (E) After fracture reduction, transverse k-pin was inserted for temporary maintenance; (F-G) Intraoperative AP view and lateral view by fluoroscopy; (H-I) AP view 2 weeks after operation; I AP view and medial view of X-ray images 1 year after operation.

Discussion

With the aging of the population, pertrochanteric femur fractures are among the most serious causes of mortality and morbidity in elderly people, and early surgical intervention is advocated to relieve pain, avoid complications of long-term bed rest and recover self-care ability.3-5 Short cephalomedullary nails have been more frequently used for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in recent years.6-8 Regardless of the type of fracture, obtaining a good reduction quality is the goal of the internal fixation of fractures and is one of the most important factors affecting the long-term clinical outcome.

However, some kinds of fractures are not amenable to closed reduction through conventional manipulation, which are referred to as irreducible patterns. The radiological features of irreducible intertrochanteric fractures have been summarized, and classifications have been introduced by several authors. In our clinical practice, we divide these fractures into 2 categories. The first category involves communicated fractures (4 parts, 5 parts, or more), with the fragments separated from each other and obviously dislocated (coronal plane, sagittal plane and transverse plane), and there is no hinge of soft tissue between the fragments. During the operation, the force induced by traction of the extremity is not transmitted to the head-neck fragment, which may cause difficulty in realigning the fracture site. The second category is related to the structures of the lesser trochanter and iliopsoas. Fractures are often not very comminuted, and obvious bone interlocking and/or soft tissue interlocking occurs, which require the assistance of instruments.

The second group includes the following 4 subtypes. ① The lesser trochanter is fractured and departed, with the lower tip inserted into the fracture site or distal femoral cavity, which may cause irreducibility. ② The lesser trochanter is connected to a head-neck fragment with traction by the interposed iliopsoas tendon, and the head-neck fragment may be seriously flexed and displaced. ③ The lesser trochanter is connected to the femoral shaft, and the thicknesses of both fracture sites are not equal. ④ The lesser trochanter is bisected equally, with the iliacus muscle interposed between the head-neck fragment and femoral shaft. This is the fracture pattern we discussed in this paper.

There are few reports about this kind of fracture in the literature, which accounts for approximately 3% of the total pertrochanteric fractures and is more common in middle-aged and relatively young elderly people but is rarely found in those over 70 years old (Table 2). In 1996, Moehring et al9 first reported 112 cases of intertrochanteric fractures treated surgically, of which 4 cases (3.6%) could not be reduced by conventional traction and closed manipulation. It was found that iliopsoas were interposed between the head-neck fragment and the femoral shaft during the operation. Only after the soft tissue interlocking was removed could the fracture be satisfactorily reduced. Said et al12 reported 5 cases of two-part intertrochanteric fractures requiring open reduction intraoperatively. The lesser trochanter was connected to the distal femoral shaft, and the proximal head-neck fragment had a characteristic long pointed apex (including the upper part of the lesser trochanter). Due to the traction of the iliopsoas and gluteus medius, the femoral shaft moved to the front of the hip joint capsule, resulting in clinical swelling in the front of the hip joint. Among the 5 cases, 2 cases had to have the iliopsoas tendon cut from the insertion of the lesser trochanter for fracture reduction. Chandak et al13 summarized 924 cases of intertrochanteric fractures treated surgically and found that 20 cases (2.2%) belonged to the irreducible pattern, which were all related to the attachment of the lower part of the lesser trochanter to the distal femoral shaft, resulting in the interposition of the iliopsoas muscle between the fracture sites.

Table 2.

Literature Data of Pertrochanteric Fractures with Bisecting Lesser Trochanter.

Author, Year Number of Cases Incidence Rate Internal Fixation
Moehring, 1996 4/112 3.6% DHS
Said, 2005 5 --- DHS
Sharma, 2014 6/212 2.8% DHS
Chandak, 2019 20/924 2.2% DHS
Our group 12/357 3.4% PFNA, TFNA

The occurrence of intertrochanteric fractures with bisection of the lesser trochanter may be related to the anatomical insertion of the iliopsoas tendon into the lesser trochanter.18,19 The iliopsoas tendon is a conjoined tendon. Bartoska et al20 dissected 50 specimens and found that the iliopsoas tendon was attached directly to the lesser trochanter in 2 portions. The first circular portion, which was the attachment of the m. psoas major tendon to the apex of the trochanter minor, while the other longitudinal portion, which included the m. iliacus tendon medially enclosing the insertion of the m. psoas major tendon and projecting distally from the base of the lesser trochanter. Philippon et al21 studied 53 specimens and found that the insertion points of the iliopsoas were a single tendon, double tendon and triple tendon, with occurrence rates of 28.3%, 64.2% and 7.5%, respectively (including iliac accessory tendon). The psoas major tendon is always in the most medial position and ends at the apex of the lesser trochanter. Gomez-Hoyos et al22 studied the tendinous footprint of the lesser trochanter and found that the iliopsoas tendon footprints in the lesser trochanter were longitudinally oval and distributed in the anteromedial region of the lesser trochanter. There were 3 specimens with a single conjoined iliopsoas tendon, while 7 specimens with a divided attachment footprint were identified for the iliacus muscle and psoas major muscle. The bald area between the tendinous insertion of the psoas major tendon and iliacus tendon was a weak area that was easily fractured, which was the main cause of the bisection of the lesser trochanter.

Conclusion

Two-part pertrochanteric femur fractures with bisection of the lesser trochanter are an irreducible fracture pattern with cortical locking and soft tissue interposition. Short cephalomedullary nail fixation for this irreducible fracture pattern provides stable fixation and allows early exercise. This technique appears to have excellent outcomes in the short and medium terms.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material - Two-Part Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures with Bisection of the Lesser Trochanter: An Irreducible Fracture Pattern

Supplemental Material for Two-Part Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures with Bisection of the Lesser Trochanter: An Irreducible Fracture Pattern by Sun-jun Hu, Shi-Min Chang, Shou-chao Du, Li-zhi Zhang, and Wen-feng Xiong in Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, no. 81772323).

Ethical approval: The article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any authors.

Supplemental Material: Supplemental material for this article is available online

ORCID iD

Shi-Min Chang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7186-5851

References

  • 1.Marques A, Lourenco O, da Silva JA., Portuguese Working Group for the Study of the Burden of Hip Fractures in Portugal . The burden of osteoporotic hip fractures in Portugal: Costs, health related quality of life and mortality. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26:2623-2630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Peeters CM, Visser E, Van de Ree CL, Gosens T, Den Oudsten BL, De Vries J. Quality of life after hip fracture in the elderly: A systematic literature review. Injury. 2016;47:1369-1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mariconda M, Costa GG, Cerbasi S, et al. Factors predicting mobility and the change in activities of daily living after hip fracture: A 1-year prospective cohort study. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30:71-77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hansson S, Rolfson O, Akesson K, Nemes S, Leonardsson O, Rogmark C. Complications and patient-reported outcome after hip fracture. A consecutive annual cohort study of 664 patients. Injury. 2015;46:2206-2211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Moerman S, Vochteloo AJ, Tuinebreijer WE, Maier AB, Mathijssen NM, Nelissen RG. Factors associated with the course of health-related quality of life after a hip fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136:935-943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aktselis I, Kokoroghiannis C, Fragkomichalos E, et al. Prospective randomised controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus a sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. Int Orthop. 2014;38:155-161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Horwitz DS, Tawari A, Suk M. Nail length in the management of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;24:e50-e58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hu SJ, Yu GR, Zhang SM. Surgical treatment of basicervical intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with cephalomeduallary hip nails. Orthop Surg. 2013;5:124-129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Moehring HD, Nowinski GP, Chapman MW, Voigtlander JP. Irreducible intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;339:197-199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sharma G, kumar GNK, Yadav S, et al. Pertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31-A1 and A2) not amenable to closed reduction: Causes of irreducibility. Injury. 2014;45:1950-1957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ikuta Y, Nagata Y, Iwasaki Y. Preoperative radiographic features of trochanteric fractures irreducible by closed reduction. Injury. 2019;50:2014-2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Said GZ, Farouk O, Said HG. An irreducible variant of intertrochanteric fractures: A technique for open reduction. Injury. 2005;36:871-874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chandak R, Malewar N, Jangle A, Agarwal R, Sharma M, Kekatpure A. Description of new “epsilon sign” and its significance in reduction in highly unstable variant of intertrochanteric fracture. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019;29:1435-1439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(suppl 1):S1-S170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chang SM, Zhang YQ, Ma Z, Li Q, Dargel J, Eysel P. Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support: A key element in stability reconstruction for the unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135:811-818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chang SM, Hou ZY, Hu SJ, Du SC. Intertrochanteric femur fracture treatment in Asia: What we know and what the world can learn. Orthop Clin North Am. 2020;51:189-205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Parker MJ, Palmer CR. A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:797-798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Polster JM, Elgabaly M, Lee H, Klika A, Drake R, Barsoum W. MRI and gross anatomy of the iliopsoas tendon complex. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37:55-58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Agrawal A. New “epsilon” sign in “highly unstable” intertrochanteric fracture. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020;30:537-538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bartoska R, Baca V, Kachlik D, Marvan J, Dzupa V. The correlation between muscles insertions and topography of break lines in pertrochanteric fractures: A comprehensive anatomical approach of complex proximal femur injuries. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;35:957-962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Philippon MJ, Devitt BM, Campbell KJ, et al. Anatomic variance of the iliopsoas tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:807-811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gomez-Hoyos J, Schroder R, Palmer IJ, Reddy M, Khoury A, Martin HD. Iliopsoas tendon insertion footprint with surgical implications in lesser trochanterplasty for treating ischiofemoral impingement: An anatomic study. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015;2:385-391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material - Two-Part Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures with Bisection of the Lesser Trochanter: An Irreducible Fracture Pattern

Supplemental Material for Two-Part Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures with Bisection of the Lesser Trochanter: An Irreducible Fracture Pattern by Sun-jun Hu, Shi-Min Chang, Shou-chao Du, Li-zhi Zhang, and Wen-feng Xiong in Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation


Articles from Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES