Abstract
Objectives:
We evaluated the association of lupus nephritis (LN) and adverse pregnancy outcomes in prospective cohorts of pregnant women with SLE (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus).
Methods:
We conducted a patient-level pooled analysis of data from 3 cohorts of pregnant women with SLE. Pooled logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association of LN and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a fixed effect model by enrolling cohort.
Results:
The pooled cohort included 393 women who received care at clinics in the United States and Canada from 1995 to 2015. There were 144(37%) women with a history of LN. Compared to women without LN, those with LN had higher odds of fetal loss (OR: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.01, 3.56) and preeclampsia (OR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.01, 4.13). Among the 31 women with active nephritis (defined as urine protein ≥ 0.5gram/24hr) there was a higher odds of poor pregnancy outcome (OR: 3.08; 95% CI: 1.31, 7.23) and fetal loss (OR: 6.29; 95% CI: 2.52, 15.70) compared to women without LN.
Conclusions:
In this pooled cohort of women with SLE, a history of LN was associated with fetal loss and preeclampsia. Active nephritis was associated with poor pregnancy outcome and fetal loss.
Introduction
Compared to the general population, pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, including fetal and maternal mortality, stroke, venous thromboembolism, preterm birth, Cesarean section, low birth weight, congenital defects, and preeclampsia.1–8 Lupus nephritis (LN), a common manifestation of SLE, is also an important risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes.9 Women with LN have higher rates of preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, preterm delivery, neonatal death, small for gestational age, and intrauterine growth restriction than women with SLE without LN. 6,10,11,12,13 Active LN has also been associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, higher risk for SLE flare, with preterm birth, severe infections.3,11,14 14,15
While previous studies have established the association of active LN and adverse pregnancy outcomes, many of these studies were conducted at single centers with homogenous patient populations.11,16–19 It is well documented that the there is a higher incidence of lupus nephritis among Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients.20 Black and Hispanic patients with LN often have greater disease severity and are at higher risk for End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) requiring renal replacement therapy.21,22 A study of claims data suggested that pregnant Black and Hispanic women may have double the odds of preeclampsia, preterm birth, and acute renal failure compared to White women. 23
In this study we evaluated the association between LN and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a pooled analysis of three prospective cohorts of pregnant women with SLE in North America.
Methods
We searched for prospective cohorts of pregnant women with a diagnosis of SLE using MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase (via Elsevier) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews between the years 1995 and 2015. We identified 46 publications describing prospective cohorts of pregnant women with SLE (Figure 1). After excluding duplicate cohorts and cohorts that did not collect relevant data on pregnancy outcomes, we attempted to contact 27 principal investigators (PI) to request patient-level data. We obtained patient-level data from 7 prospective cohorts of pregnant women with SLE. This analysis was restricted to cohorts in North America: Duke University, Johns Hopkins University, and the University of Toronto. We included only participants who established care prior to 20 weeks’ gestation to minimize selection bias based on referral for complicated pregnancy, and randomly selected only one pregnancy per participant to include in the pooled analysis. To increase the generalizability of our results, we included all eligible women regardless of SLE disease activity and severity, kidney disease severity and immunomodulatory therapy use.
Figure 1:
Flow Diagram
Measures
Exposures of interest included race and lupus nephritis. Maternal race was based on self-report and stratified as White, Black, Asian, Hispanic, and Other. Because there were few patients in the Asian, Hispanic, and Other racial and ethnic groups, we excluded them from our analysis to focus on the comparison of Black and White women (Figure 1). LN was defined by a documented history of nephritis and was further classified as active or inactive based on the presence or absence of proteinuria ≥ 0.5gram/24hr prior to 20 weeks’ gestation. Adverse pregnancy outcomes of interest included fetal loss (defined as loss at any time during the gestational period), preterm birth (birth before 37 weeks’ gestation), preeclampsia (based on physician diagnosis), and a composite poor pregnancy outcome (outcome of fetal loss, preeclampsia, or preterm birth).
Statistical Analyses
Summary statistics are presented as mean ± SD for continuous data and percentages for categorical data. Categorical variables were compared using chi-squared test and continuous variables by ANOVA. In separate analyses, LN was considered as a 2-level categorical variable (any history, yes or no) and as a 3-level categorical variable (no history, inactive LN, active LN). Logistic regression models with fixed effects by medical center estimated the association of LN with adverse pregnancy outcomes, adjusted for maternal age and race. All analyses were conducted in SAS 9.4 (Cary, North Carolina). The Duke Institutional Review Board determined this study was exempt (Pro00066961).
Results
The pooled cohort included 393 women, including 148 women (38%) of Black race and 245 women (62%) of White race. The mean age at delivery was 30.6 years (SD 5.4). Black women in the pooled cohort were younger with a mean age of 28.9 (SD 5.7). One hundred and forty-four women (37%) had a history of lupus nephritis, with only 31 (8%) women meeting the study criteria for active nephritis. Black women were more likely to have a history of LN than white women. The majority of women were prescribed immunomodulatory medications during pregnancy, with 266 women (70%) prescribed hydroxychloroquine, 190 women (50%) prescribed corticosteroids, and 61 (16%) prescribed azathioprine and 214 (58%) received aspirin. Almost half of women with active LN received corticosteroids, azathioprine and aspirin (S1).
Adverse pregnancy outcomes were common, with 152 (43%) of women experiencing a poor pregnancy outcome (Table 2). These included 50 (13%) women with fetal loss, 88 women (26%) with preterm birth, and 44 (14%) women with preeclampsia. Preterm birth, preeclampsia, and poor pregnancy outcome, though not fetal death, were more common among Black than White women. Women with a history of LN had higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes than women without this history. In logistic regression models adjusted for maternal age and race, women with a history of LN, had almost twice the odds of fetal loss, preterm birth, preeclampsia, and poor pregnancy outcomes (Table 3). Much of this increase in adverse outcomes, however, was due to very high rates of complications in women with active LN, not inactive LN (Figure 2, Table 3). When adjusted for maternal age and race, women with inactive LN did not have more frequent pregnancy complications. Women with active LN, however, had six times the odds of fetal loss (OR: 6.29; 95% CI: 2.52, 15.70) and three times the odds of poor pregnancy outcome (OR: 3.08; 95% CI: 1.31, 7.23) compared to women without a history of LN (Table 3).
Table 2:
Overall Pregnancy Outcomes of Included Cohorts by Race
| Overall | Black | White | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n=393 | n=148 | n=245 | p-value | |
|
| ||||
| Maternal Age at Delivery | 30.6 (5.4) | 28.8 (5.7) | 31.7 (4.9) | <0.0001 |
| Duration of SLE, years (n=388) | 7.4 (5.3) | 6.8 (4.9) | 7.7 (5.5) | 0.09 |
| Antiphospholipid Syndrome | 37/344 (11%) | 12/141 (9%) | 25/203 (12%) | 0.3 |
| High Disease Activity * | 122/392 (31%) | 58/147 (39%) | 64/245 (26%) | <0.005 |
| History of Lupus Nephritis | ||||
| No history | 249 (63%) | 76 (51%) | 173 (71%) | <0.0001 |
| Inactive nephritis | 112 (28%) | 47 (32%) | 65 (27%) | |
| Active nephritis | 31 (8%) | 25 (17%) | 6 (2%) | |
| History of nephritis but unknown activity during pregnancy | 1 (0.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.4%) | |
| Pregnancy Outcomes: | ||||
| Poor Pregnancy Outcome | 152/351 (43%) | 73/136 (54%) | 79/215 (37%) | 0.002 |
| Fetal loss | 50 (13%) | 21 (14%) | 29 (12%) | 0.5 |
| Preterm birth | 88/337 (26%) | 43/126 (34%) | 45/211 (21%) | 0.01 |
| Preeclampsia | 44/310 (14%) | 24/118 (20%) | 20/192 (10%) | 0.02 |
Defined as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) >4 ever during pregnancy
Table 3.
Association of history of lupus, active and inactive lupus nephritis with pregnancy outcomes, adjusted for age and maternal race.
| OR (95% CI) | No History of LN | History of LN | No History of LN | Inactive LN | Active LN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poor Pregnancy Outcome | 1.0 (ref) | 1.59 (1.00, 2.51) | 1.0 (ref) | 1.36 (0.83, 2.22) | 3.08 (1.31, 7.23) |
| Fetal loss | 1.0 (ref) | 1.90 (1.01, 3.56) | 1.0 (ref) | 1.18 (0.56, 2.50) | 6.29 (2.52, 15.70) |
| Preterm birth | 1.0 (ref) | 1.52 (0.90, 2.57) | 1.0 (ref) | 1.42 (0.81, 2.48) | 2.28 (0.84, 6.20) |
| Preeclampsia | 1.0 (ref) | 2.04 (1.01, 4.13) | 1.0 (ref) | 1.86 (0.88, 3.94) | 3.10 (0.98, 9.79) |
Figure 2:
Incremental increase in adverse outcomes based on lupus nephritis diagnosis and disease activity
Discussion
We found that women with active LN had higher rates of poor pregnancy outcome, fetal loss, preterm birth and preeclampsia compared to women without a history of LN and inactive LN. In multivariable analysis, women with a history of LN had higher odds of preeclampsia and fetal loss, compared to women without nephritis. We suspect this finding was driven largely by the higher odds of these outcomes in women with active LN. Compared to women without nephritis, women with active LN had higher odds of poor pregnancy outcome and fetal loss. Although not statistically significant in this smaller subgroup, preeclampsia and preterm birth were also more common in women with active LN compared to women without nephritis. Our results support previous studies demonstrating active nephritis is a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with SLE.19,3
We found high rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes. We suspect the high rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes were due to the broad inclusion of women into lupus pregnancy cohorts regardless of SLE and LN disease activity, immunosuppressant use, medical comorbidities and kidney function. For instance, over one-third of women in the combined cohort had high disease activity and not all women with active LN were prescribed azathioprine and corticosteroids during pregnancy. Almost a third of women in our cohort did not receive hydroxychloroquine, which has been associated with reduced risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm birth and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.24,25 The low rates of azathioprine and corticosteroids among women with active LN may explain the higher frequencies of adverse pregnancy outcomes compared to other studies with more selective criteria, such as the PROMISSE study.5
We also observed that Black women had higher rates of high disease activity and active LN compared to White women (Table 2). Black women also had higher frequencies of poor pregnancy outcome, preterm birth, and preeclampsia. While the increase in prior and active LN in Black women contributes to these poor outcomes, even without a history of LN, it appears that Black women with SLE have higher rates of preterm birth and preeclampsia than white women with SLE. Our results are consistent with previous studies that demonstrate a disproportionate amount of Black and Hispanic women with LN and higher disease severity compared to White women. 26,27 A strength of this study is the high proportion of Black pregnant women with SLE, a group that is often under-represented in clinical research.21,28
Few studies have evaluated racial disparities in pregnancy outcomes among women with SLE and LN. The LUMINA study, a multiethnic study of patients with SLE, revealed a 5-fold odds of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with kidney involvement prior to pregnancy. In the PROMISSE study, Black women with antiphospholipid antibodies had 10-fold the odds of adverse pregnancy outcomes, however no racial differences were observed in adverse pregnancy outcomes in women without antiphospholipid antibodies, with adjustments for education, community income, and community education. Our study provides additional insight regarding race and adverse pregnancy outcomes, though we do not have complete data on the other social determinants of health that could be modifying the risk posed by race. Further studies are needed in non-white populations to understand the underlying causes for increased poor pregnancy outcomes in women of color and how they can be addressed.
Our study had several limitations. We did not have complete kidney biopsy data for all pregnancies to determine WHO class of LN. It has previously been established that pregnant women with World Health Organization (WHO) proliferative classes (III and IV) of LN have higher rates of preeclampsia, infection, hemorrhage and SLE flares. Advanced kidney disease of any etiology has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.29 Carmona et al. also found babies born to women with WHO Class III and IV disease had lower birthweights compared to women with Class II and V disease and women without nephritis.30 We did not have preconception data available for all participants including markers of disease activity such as anti-double-stranded DNA, complements, and proteinuria. Information on preexisting medical comorbidities and family medical history was not available. Although we provide information on immunomodulatory medications, we did not have complete data on other medications that could influence pregnancy outcomes, including calcium and low molecular weight heparin.
In this study we offer a real-world glimpse of pregnancies in women with SLE and LN. Our study also represents one of few multicenter studies evaluating adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with LN,31,32 with a high representation of Black women. Much of the literature on pregnancy outcomes in women with SLE and LN are from single centers with limited generalizability for clinical practice. Further scholarship on prescribing practices, medication adherence, and racial disparities among pregnant women with LN is needed to develop interventions targeted at improving pregnancy outcomes.
Table 1:
Baseline Characteristics Included Cohorts by Medical Center
| Pooled Cohort | Duke | Hopkins | Toronto | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Included pregnancies (1/woman) | n=393 | n=96 | n=248 | n=49 |
|
| ||||
| Maternal Race (self-reported) | ||||
| Black | 148 (38%) | 56 (58%) | 85 (34%) | 7 (14%) |
| White | 245 (62%) | 40 (42%) | 163 (66%) | 42 (86%) |
| Maternal Age at Delivery | 30.6 (5.4) | 29.7 (5.5) | 30.8 (5.2) | 31.4 (5.6) |
| SLE History: | ||||
| Duration of SLE pre-pregnancy, years (n=388) | 7.4 (5.3) | 7.9 (5.1) | 6.9 (5.2) | 8.7 (5.7) |
| Antiphospholipid Syndrome (n=344) | 37 (11%) | 4 (4%) | 33 (13%) | NR |
| History of Lupus Nephritis | 144 (37%) | 29 (30%) | 106 (43%) | 9 (18%) |
| Medications in Pregnancy | ||||
| Hydroxychloroquine | 266/379 (70%) | 86 (90%) | 166 (67%) | 14/35 (40%) |
| Prednisone | 190/379 (50%) | 49 (51%) | 120 (48%) | 21/35 (60%) |
| Azathioprine | 61/380 (16%) | 23 (24%) | 28 (11%) | 10/36 (28%) |
NR: Not reported
Funding and Disclosures:
Lucas: American Kidney Fund Clinical Scientist in Nephrology Fellowship Program.
Eudy: NIH NCATS Award Number 1KL2TR002554.
Clowse: AHRQ 1K18HS023443-01A1; Arthritis Foundation, Arthritis Investigator Award.
Disclosures: GlaxoSmithKline’s Independent Medical Education Funding
Petri: NIH RO-1 AR069572
Contributor Information
Anika Lucas, Duke University School of Medicine.
Amanda M. Eudy, Duke University School of Medicine.
Dafna Gladman, University of Toronto.
Michelle Petri, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Murray Urowitz, University of Toronto.
Christina M. Wyatt, Duke University School of Medicine.
Megan E.B. Clowse, Duke University School of Medicine.
References
- 1.Bundhun PK, Soogund MZ, Huang F. Impact of systemic lupus erythematosus on maternal and fetal outcomes following pregnancy: A meta-analysis of studies published between years 2001–2016. J Autoimmun. May 2017;79:17–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2017.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Maynard S, Guerrier G, Duffy M. Pregnancy in Women With Systemic Lupus and Lupus Nephritis. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. Sep 2019;26(5):330–337. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2019.08.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Smyth A, Oliveira GH, Lahr BD, Bailey KR, Norby SM, Garovic VD. A systematic review and metaanalysis of pregnancy outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. Nov 2010;5(11):2060–8. doi: 10.2215/cjn.00240110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lightstone L, Hladunewich MA. Lupus Nephritis and Pregnancy: Concerns and Management. Semin Nephrol. Jul 2017;37(4):347–353. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2017.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Buyon JP, Kim MY, Guerra MM, et al. Predictors of Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients With Lupus: A Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. Aug 4 2015;163(3):153–63. doi: 10.7326/m14-2235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bramham K, Hunt BJ, Bewley S, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus with and without previous nephritis. Article. J Rheumatol 2011;38(9):1906–1913. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.100997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Clowse ME. Lupus activity in pregnancy. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. May 2007;33(2):237–52, v. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2007.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Peart E, Clowse ME. Systemic lupus erythematosus and pregnancy outcomes: an update and review of the literature. Curr Opin Rheumatol. Mar 2014;26(2):118–23. doi: 10.1097/bor.0000000000000030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.de Jesus GR, Mendoza-Pinto C, de Jesus NR, et al. Understanding and Managing Pregnancy in Patients with Lupus. Autoimmune Dis. 2015;2015:943490. doi: 10.1155/2015/943490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kattah AG. Pregnancy and Lupus Nephritis. Semin Nephrol. 2015;35(5):487–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Imbasciati E, Tincani A, Gregorini G, et al. Pregnancy in women with pre-existing lupus nephritis: predictors of fetal and maternal outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. Feb 2009;24(2):519–25. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wu J, Ma J, Zhang WH, Di W. Management and outcomes of pregnancy with or without lupus nephritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;14:885–901. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.S160760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gladman DD, Tandon A, Ibanez D, Urowitz MB. The effect of lupus nephritis on pregnancy outcome and fetal and maternal complications. J Rheumatol. Apr 2010;37(4):754–8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Saavedra MA, Cruz-Reyes C, Vera-Lastra O, et al. Impact of previous lupus nephritis on maternal and fetal outcomes during pregnancy. Clin Rheumatol. May 2012;31(5):813–9. doi: 10.1007/s10067012-1941-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Attia DH, Mokbel A, Haggag HM, Naeem N. Pregnancy outcome in women with active and inactive lupus nephritis: A prospective cohort study. Lupus. Jun 2019;28(7):806–817. doi: 10.1177/0961203319846650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Huong DL, Wechsler B, Vauthier-Brouzes D, Beaufils H, Lefebvre G, Piette JC. Pregnancy in past or present lupus nephritis: a study of 32 pregnancies from a single centre. Ann Rheum Dis. Jun 2001;60(6):599–604. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.6.599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Moroni G, Quaglini S, Banfi G, et al. Pregnancy in lupus nephritis. Am J Kidney Dis. Oct 2002;40(4):713–20. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.35678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rahman FZ, Rahman J, Al-Suleiman SA, Rahman MS. Pregnancy outcome in lupus nephropathy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. Mar 2005;271(3):222–6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-003-0574-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wagner SJ, Craici I, Reed D, et al. Maternal and foetal outcomes in pregnant patients with active lupus nephritis. Lupus. Apr 2009;18(4):342–7. doi: 10.1177/0961203308097575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Drenkard C, Lim SS. Update on lupus epidemiology: advancing health disparities research through the study of minority populations. Curr Opin Rheumatol. Nov 2019;31(6):689–696. doi: 10.1097/bor.0000000000000646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Korbet SM, Schwartz MM, Evans J, Lewis EJ. Severe lupus nephritis: racial differences in presentation and outcome. J Am Soc Nephrol. Jan 2007;18(1):244–54. doi: 10.1681/asn.2006090992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Parikh SV, Almaani S, Brodsky S, Rovin BH. Update on Lupus Nephritis: Core Curriculum 2020. Am J Kidney Dis. Aug 2020;76(2):265–281. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.10.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Clowse ME, Grotegut C. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Pregnancies of Women With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). Oct 2016;68(10):1567–72. doi: 10.1002/acr.22847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Balevic SJ, Weiner D, Clowse MEB, et al. Hydroxychloroquine PK and exposure-response in pregnancies with lupus: the importance of adherence for neonatal outcomes. Lupus Sci Med. Jan 2022;9(1)doi: 10.1136/lupus-2021-000602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Seo MR, Chae J, Kim YM, et al. Hydroxychloroquine treatment during pregnancy in lupus patients is associated with lower risk of preeclampsia. Lupus. May 2019;28(6):722–730. doi: 10.1177/0961203319843343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lanata CM, Nititham J, Taylor KE, et al. Genetic contributions to lupus nephritis in a multi-ethnic cohort of systemic lupus erythematous patients. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0199003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pryor KP, Barbhaiya M, Costenbader KH, Feldman CH. Disparities in Lupus and Lupus Nephritis Care and Outcomes Among US Medicaid Beneficiaries. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. Feb 2021;47(1):41–53. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2020.09.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Williams JN, Dall’Era M, Lim SS, et al. Increasing Ancestral Diversity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Clinical Studies. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). Oct 7 2020;doi: 10.1002/acr.24474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rodrigues BC, Lacerda MI, Ramires de Jesus GR, et al. The impact of different classes of lupus nephritis on maternal and fetal outcomes: a cohort study of 147 pregnancies. Lupus. Apr 2019;28(4):492–500. doi: 10.1177/0961203319829825 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Carmona F, Font J, Moga I, et al. Class III-IV proliferative lupus nephritis and pregnancy: a study of 42 cases. Am J Reprod Immunol. Apr 2005;53(4):182–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2005.00263.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Moroni G, Doria A, Giglio E, et al. Maternal outcome in pregnant women with lupus nephritis. A prospective multicenter study. J Autoimmun. Nov 2016;74:194–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.06.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fischer-Betz R, Specker C, Brinks R, Aringer M, Schneider M. Low risk of renal flares and negative outcomes in women with lupus nephritis conceiving after switching from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine. Rheumatology (Oxford). Jun 2013;52(6):1070–6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


