Summary:
Drugs of abuse increase extracellular concentrations of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens (NAc), resulting in transcriptional alterations that drive long-lasting cellular and behavioral adaptations. While decades of research have focused on the transcriptional mechanisms by which drugs of abuse influence neuronal physiology and function, few studies have comprehensively defined NAc cell type heterogeneity in transcriptional responses to drugs of abuse. Here, we used single nucleus RNA-seq (snRNA-seq) to characterize the transcriptome of over 39,000 NAc cells from male and female adult Sprague-Dawley rats following acute or repeated cocaine experience. This dataset identified 16 transcriptionally distinct cell populations, including two populations of medium spiny neurons (MSNs) that express the Drd1 dopamine receptor (D1-MSNs). Critically, while both populations expressed classic marker genes of D1-MSNs, only one population exhibited a robust transcriptional response to cocaine. Validation of population-selective transcripts using RNA in situ hybridization revealed distinct spatial compartmentalization of these D1-MSN populations within the NAc. Finally, analysis of published NAc snRNA-seq datasets from non-human primates and humans demonstrated conservation of MSN subtypes across rat and higher order mammals, and further highlighted cell type-specific transcriptional differences across the NAc and broader striatum. These results highlight the utility in using snRNA-seq to characterize both cell type heterogeneity and cell type-specific responses to cocaine and provides a useful resource for cross-species comparisons of NAc cell composition.
INTRODUCTION
Drug addiction is a chronic, complex neuropsychiatric disorder characterized by a loss of control of drug-taking behaviors. The current drug addiction and overdose epidemic in the United States has been worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic as people struggle with social isolation and economic distress1. Much of the current addiction epidemic and surge in overdose deaths has been attributed to the use of opioids and, in particular, synthetic opioids such as fentanyl. However, drug overdose deaths associated with psychostimulants rose 50% between 2019-20202. Furthermore, drug overdose deaths associated with cocaine have increased 3-fold since 19992,3. While pharmacological treatments exist for opioid use disorder, no such treatments are available for stimulant use disorder. Thus, continued research on the molecular adaptations that occur following exposure to cocaine, and the cell types that may be susceptible to these adaptations, is important for development of future therapeutics.
The mesolimbic dopamine pathway is heavily implicated in molecular, cellular, and behavioral responses to drugs of abuse. This pathway consists of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) that project to the nucleus accumbens (NAc). Dopaminergic neurotransmission in the NAc is important for adaptive behavior, as dopamine (DA) release tracks reward-predictive cues as a function of learning4. Exposure to drugs of abuse, such as cocaine, increases extracellular concentrations of DA within the NAc. Cocaine extends DA transmission by blocking the DA transporter present on VTA dopaminergic neurons, and this mechanism is required for behavioral and physiological responses to cocaine5. Drug-induced elevations in DA promote transcriptional and epigenetic reorganization that ultimately gives rise to the cellular and behavioral adaptations that drive addiction-linked behaviors. Within the NAc, DA engages the type-1 DA receptor (DRD1, encoded by the Drd1 gene) that is present on a subset of medium spiny neurons (MSNs), called D1-MSNs. DRD1 activation stimulates signal transduction cascades that results in CREB phosphorylation and activation of immediate early gene (IEG) expression programs. These IEG programs are comprised largely of activity-dependent transcription factors such as Fos, FosB, and Nr4a16-8, each of which are critical mediators for cellular and behavioral adaptations to drugs of abuse9-11.
The NAc is a heterogeneous brain region consisting of many transcriptionally defined cell types. While a significant amount of research has focused on the role of DA receptor-expressing MSNs in adaptations to drugs of abuse, recent reports have also demonstrated significant roles for other cell types. For example, optogenetic inhibition of NAc somatostatin expressing interneurons (Sst-interneurons) attenuates cocaine-induced conditioned place preference12, suggesting that these cells are important for behavioral adaptations to drugs of abuse. Similarly, photoinhibition of cholinergic interneurons (Chat-interneurons) also blocks cocaine-induced conditioned place preference13. Interestingly, recent research has also demonstrated an important role for astrocytes in mediating cocaine-induced synaptic and behavioral adaptations14,15. These results demonstrate that diverse cell types within the NAc contribute to the molecular, cellular, and behavioral effects of cocaine.
Despite established cell type heterogeneity in the NAc, many studies rely on transgenic animal models that allow for the investigation of these changes only in individual cell populations. Unlike many techniques focused on a defined class of cells, single nucleus RNA-sequencing (snRNA-seq) provides unprecedented resolution that allows for the investigation of thousands of genes in thousands of cells with a single assay. This resolution not only permits detection of cocaine-induced transcriptional changes in many cell types, but also allows for better understanding of the molecular heterogeneity within the NAc. Recently, snRNA-seq approaches have been used to generate cellular atlases of the mouse16, non-human primate17, and human18 NAc. However, snRNA-seq has only been used to define early gene expression changes to acute cocaine, while the transcriptional effects of repeated cocaine in various NAc cell types is less well studied. Here, we used snRNA-seq to transcriptionally profile 39,254 nuclei from male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. Rats were further subdivided by treatment (cocaine or saline) and exposure paradigm (acute or repeated). This study confirms both the presence of many previously defined cell types within the rat NAc, and reveals that D1-MSNs exhibit the most robust transcriptional response to cocaine across all cell populations. Additionally, snRNA-seq of the rat NAc allowed for the investigation of cluster-specific expression of different neurotransmitter receptor systems and identified novel marker genes for two populations of transcriptionally distinct D1-MSNs.
RESULTS
Identification of transcriptionally distinct cell types within the rat NAc.
To begin understanding cell-type heterogeneity within the rat NAc, we first integrated 15,655 nuclei from a previously published dataset6 consisting of male and female adult Sprague-Dawley rats that received a single (acute) injection of cocaine with 23,599 nuclei from a new dataset following seven daily (repeated) injections of cocaine (Fig. 1a, Supp. Fig. 1). Following integration and dimensionality reduction, we identified 11 transcriptionally distinct neuronal populations and 5 glial populations that were not specific to a single dataset and did not differ by sex (Fig. 1b, c, Supp. Fig. 2, 3). Furthermore, calculation of Local Inverse Simpson’s Index (LISI) demonstrated that all clusters were well mixed, indicating successful integration (Supp. Fig. 2). A significant portion of neurons within the NAc are GABAergic MSNs that express high levels of Gad1, Ppp1r1b, Foxp2, and Bcl11b (Fig. 1d, e). A large majority of MSNs can be further classified by the expression of Drd1, the gene encoding the type-1 dopamine receptor, or Drd2, the gene encoding the type-2 dopamine receptor (Fig. 1d). While we have previously reported the presence of two transcriptionally distinct Drd2-expressing MSN populations (Drd2-MSN-1 and Drd2-MSN-2)6, this analysis also identified two transcriptionally distinct Drd1-expressing MSN populations as well (Drd1-MSN-1 and Drd1-MSN-2; Fig. 1b,d). In addition to Drd1- and Drd2-MSNs, this analysis also identified previously reported Drd3- and Grm8- expressing MSNs (Drd3-MSN and Grm8-MSN), which have also been identified within the striatum of non-human primates17. While most of the GABAergic neurons in the NAc are MSNs, distinct populations of GABAergic interneurons are also known to play critical yet distinct roles in striatal function19. While we have previously characterized parvalbumin and somatostatin interneurons within the NAc6, this analysis also identified a cholinergic interneuron population marked by the expression of Chat (Chat-Interneuron). Previous research has demonstrated that Chat-Interneurons are critical regulators of drug-induced behavioral adaptations13, and this dataset now provides comprehensive transcriptional profiling of these cells within the rat NAc. In addition to transcriptionally distinct neuronal populations, we also identified 5 glial clusters that are almost entirely devoid of Gad1 and Syt1 mRNA, and expressed canonical markers of their respective populations (Fig. 1d,e). For example, Astrocytes exhibit high expression of both Aqp4 and Gja1, while Oligodendrocytes exhibit high expression of Mbp, the gene encoding myelin basic protein (Fig. 1d, e).
Computational investigation of transcriptionally distinct populations of Drd1-expressing MSNs.
The integration of over 39,000 nuclei from rats that underwent different cocaine exposure paradigms identified two populations of Drd1-expressing MSNs (Drd1-MSN-1 and Drd1-MSN-2; Fig. 2a). To begin understanding the distinct gene expression signatures of these Drd1-MSN populations, we conducted a differential expression analysis using pseudobulked gene expression matrices. This analysis identified 506 genes enriched in the Drd1-MSN-1 cluster and 665 genes enriched in the Drd1-MSN-2 cluster. Interestingly, Ebf1 is the most highly enriched differentially expressed gene in the Drd1-MSN-1 population (Fig. 2b). Ebf1 is a known marker of D1-MSNs and is implicated in MSN early development20. Calb1, the gene encoding the calcium binding protein Calbindin 1, is another gene that is enriched in the Drd1-MSN-1 population (Fig. 2b). Calb1 is a spatial marker within the NAc and is highly enriched in the NAc core21. Included in the top 10 differentially expressed genes in the Drd1-MSN-2 population was Htr4, the gene that codes for the serotonin receptor 4 (Fig. 2b). HTR4 autoradiography suggests that this receptor is located in the ventral portion of the NAc shell22. The differential enrichment of Htr4 and Calb1 suggests that the two populations of Drd1-expressing MSNs identified by snRNA-seq are both transcriptionally and spatially distinct.
Next, we set out to understand the specific gene networks and pathways that may be enriched in these two D1-MSN populations. Molecular function pathway analysis revealed an enrichment of genes involved in calcium transport and signaling in the Drd1-MSN-1 population, but enrichment of genes involved in potassium transport in the Drd1-MSN-2 population (Fig. 2c). For example, Trpc3, a gene encoding a calcium permeable channel, and Cacng3, a gene encoding an L-type calcium channel, are both highly enriched in the Drd1-MSN-1 population (Fig. 2d). Conversely, several genes encoding potassium channels, such as Kcnc1, Kcnc2, and Kcng3, are enriched in the Drd1-MSN-2 population, further highlighting the enrichment of genes involved in potassium transport in this population. While these genes are differentially enriched, both calcium- and potassium- related genes are expressed to some extent in both clusters (Fig. 2d).
Functional investigation of transcriptionally distinct populations of neurons in the mammalian brain requires the use of cell type-specific promoters. To facilitate the future investigation of the two populations of transcriptionally distinct Drd1-expressing MSNs, we next identified potential marker genes that are both differentially and highly expressed within a population. This analysis identified Ebf1 as a potential marker gene for the Drd1-MSN-1 population (Fig. 2e) and Htr4 as a potential marker gene for the Drd1-MSN-2 population (Fig. 2f). An additional characteristic of marker genes is that they are expressed in a large proportion of cells within the cluster. Plotting the expression of these genes on a UMAP shows differential enrichment of Ebf1 and Htr4 between the Drd1-expressing MSN populations (Fig. 2g). However, Ebf1 is also expressed in endothelial cells, while Htr4 is also expressed in Drd2- and Drd3-MSNs. Thus, these genes may act as marker genes in combination with Drd1 but cannot act as marker genes alone.
In-situ validation of transcriptionally distinct Drd1-expressing MSNs.
To validate snRNA-seq findings demonstrating that Htr4 and Ebf1 are in largely distinct populations of Drd1-expressing MSNs in the NAc, we used RNAscope23, a previously established fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) protocol. To enable visualization of distinct puncta representing cells expressing a combination of Drd1, Htr4, and Ebf1, we performed multiplexed analysis with probe sets specific to each transcript (Fig. 3a-c). Consistent with our computational analysis, we identify unique subpopulations of Drd1+ cells that are either Ebf1+ or Htr4+, with significantly fewer cells that are positive for both Ebf1 and Htr4 (Fig. 3b-c). Furthermore, our in situ experiments revealed unique spatial distributions for these subpopulations with a significantly higher proportion of Drd1+/Htr4+ cells in the NAc shell and Drd1+/Ebf1+ cells in the NAc core (Fig. 3d-e). There was no significant spatial distribution difference in the proportion of Drd1+/Ebf1+/Htr4+ cells. Overall, these results are consistent with snRNA-seq analysis, and confirm largely non-overlapping expression of Ebf1 and Htr4 within Drd1+ cells (Fig. 3f).
Cocaine experience differentially alters the transcriptome of specific cell types within the NAc.
We previously demonstrated that a single acute cocaine exposure differentially alters the transcriptome of molecularly defined cell types within the NAc6. To begin understanding how repeated cocaine exposure alters the transcriptome of distinct NAc populations, we injected male and female Sprague-Dawley rats with 20mg/kg cocaine for 7 consecutive days (Fig. 1a, Supp. Fig. 1). Before directly comparing acute and repeated exposures, we first investigated cell type-specific transcriptional responses to cocaine exposure, regardless of type or duration. To do this, we collapsed both datasets and used a pseudobulk approach to identify cocaine-dependent, cell type-specific differentially expressed genes (DEGs; Supp. Table 2). This approach increased the number of replicates used for statistical comparisons and circumvented previously identified issues with deprecated differential expression methods previously used for snRNA-seq24. Strikingly, the Drd1-MSN-1 population exhibited the most robust transcriptional response to cocaine, with 236 total DEGs following cocaine experience (184 upregulated, 52 downregulated; Fig. 4a, b). These upregulated DEGs include immediate early genes (IEGs) such as Nr4a3, Tiparp, and Fosl2 (Fig. 4b). Recent evidence has demonstrated that astrocytes within the NAc also play a key role in the neuronal and behavioral response to dopamine and drugs of abuse14,15,25. Disruption of glutamatergic transport, release, and signaling is implicated in substance use disorders26,27, and astrocytes are heavily involved in the regulation of this process across the brain28. Interestingly, Gria1, an ionotropic AMPA receptor, is significantly decreased in Astrocytes following cocaine exposure (Fig. 4c). Unlike the Drd1-MSN-1 population, Astrocytes exhibited more genes with cocaine-dependent decreases in expression (Fig. 4c,g). While most DEGs in the Astrocyte population are downregulated with cocaine, Pde10a, the gene encoding the cAMP-regulated phosphodiesterase 10A, is upregulated by cocaine in both the Astrocyte and Sst-Interneuron cluster (Fig. 4c,d).
Previous research has demonstrated that Drd1-expressing MSNs exhibit robust transcriptional changes in response to cocaine6,8,9,29. More specifically, snRNA-seq from the rat NAc following acute cocaine exposure demonstrated that D1-MSNs have the most robust transcriptional response to cocaine when compared to other transcriptionally distinct NAc cell types6. In this dataset, only one of the Drd1-expressing MSN populations (Drd1-MSN-1) had a robust transcriptional response to cocaine. For example, Nr4a3, Fosb, Fosl2, and Tiparp are all significantly increased following cocaine exposure only in the Drd1-MSN-1 population (Fig. 4e).
Next, we set out to investigate the relationship of cocaine dependent DEGs across cocaine exposure paradigms. To do this, we first conducted DEG analyses comparing cocaine and saline samples with exposure type ignored (i.e., all cocaine samples vs all saline samples), acute exposure only, and repeated exposure samples only. The log2 (Fold Change) values for all DEGs were then concatenated and subject to hierarchical clustering. Overall, this analysis identified that many of the genes altered by acute cocaine are also altered by repeated cocaine in the same direction (Fig. 4f-h). However, for the Drd1-MSN-1 population some genes altered by acute cocaine are not altered by repeated cocaine. Furthermore, while the overall pattern shows concordant gene expression patterns, some cocaine-regulated genes within the Astrocyte cluster demonstrate opposite changes with an acute or repeated exposure. To estimate the degree of concordance between gene expression programs altered by acute and repeated cocaine exposure in a threshold-free manner, we next used the rank-rank hypergeometric overlap (RRHO) algorithm30. To complete this analysis, we ranked gene lists by the log2 (Fold Change), which was calculated by dividing the log-normalized expression values of cocaine cells by the log-normalized expression values of saline cells. This analysis identified that, on a cell type-specific basis, acute and repeated cocaine gene expression signatures are primarily concordant. For example, the acute and repeated cocaine changes for the Drd1-MSN-1, Astrocyte, and Sst-Interneuron populations are significantly concordant for both up regulated and downregulated genes (Fig. 4i-l). However, the strength of this overlap and concordance is substantially different for these populations.
Conservation of MSN subtypes across mammalian species.
Recently, transcriptional atlases of the non-human primate (NHP) striatum17 and human NAc18 have demonstrated similar gene expression profiles of specific marker genes that we identify within the rat NAc. To quantify this overlap and perform cross-species comparisons, we focused on conservation of MSNs given that both NHP and human datasets identified and validated the presence of several transcriptionally distinct MSN subtypes. Direct comparison of our rat snRNA-seq dataset to monkey or human datasets revealed potential conservation of many NHP and human cell types (Fig. 5a-c). For example, the rat Drd1-MSN-1 population is correlated with the human “D1. MSN_A” and NHP “D1.Matrix” populations, and the rat Drd2-MSN-1 population is correlated with the human “D2.MSN_A” and the NHP “D2.Matrix” population (Fig. 5a-d).
Transcriptionally conserved cell types should exhibit similar expression and enrichment of marker genes. For example, Drd2-MSNs are classically characterized by the enrichment of Drd2 and Penk, while Drd1-MSNs are characterized by the enrichment of Drd1 and Ebf1. Across species, transcriptionally distinct populations of Drd2-MSNs are similarly enriched for Drd2, but differ in their enrichment of Penk (Fig. 5c, Supp. Fig. 4a-c). A similar pattern is observed in Drd1-MSNs across species, as Drd1 is highly enriched in Drd1-MSNs, but Ebf1 enrichment differs (Fig. 5c, Supp. Fig. 4a-c). While the differential expression of Htr4 or Ebf1 distinguishes Drd1-MSNs in the rat NAc, this pattern is not observed in higher order mammals as Htr4 is ubiquitously expressed across cell types (Supp. Fig. 4a-c). Furthermore, Htr4 is enriched in the “MSN.D1_A” human population (Fig. 5c) along with Ebf1. Thus, Htr4 and Ebf1 may not be suitable markers for distinguishing between transcriptionally distinct populations of Drd1-MSNs in higher order mammals.
DISCUSSION
Within the past few decades, a major focus of drug addiction research has been on the transcriptional and epigenetic changes occurring in the NAc following drug exposure. While these studies have been integral in our understanding of how drug experience shapes the brain, they have primarily used techniques that ignore cell-type heterogeneity. Furthermore, although the NAc is fundamental in reward processing and the rat is a primary model organism used for reward-related research, few studies have comprehensively profiled the rat NAc at the transcriptional level. snRNA-seq provides the unique opportunity to study both the cell type-specific transcriptional responses to drugs of abuse, as well as the cell-type heterogeneity that exists within the NAc. In the present study, we report the integration of a previously published NAc snRNA-seq dataset collected following acute cocaine exposure6 with a new dataset collected following repeated cocaine exposure. The resulting dataset contains 39,254 nuclei across 16 transcriptionally distinct populations (11 neuronal and 5 non-neuronal), which more than doubles the size of our previously published work. The addition of both biological and technical replicates, along with the addition of over 24,000 nuclei, allowed us to generate a comprehensive transcriptional atlas of the rat NAc and investigate cell type-specific transcriptional responses to cocaine.
We were also interested in understanding the distribution of expression of genes encoding different receptor systems, which provides additional information regarding which cell types may respond to diverse classes of drugs. For example, there is significant renewed interest in the action of psychedelic drugs, many of which act on serotonin receptors. Htr2a, the gene encoding serotonin receptor type 2A and the expected target of many psychedelics, is expressed in a small proportion of Drd1- and Drd2- expressing MSNs, as well as Sst-interneurons (Supp. Fig. 5a). Thus, these populations of cells will most likely respond to classic psychedelics. There is also considerable interest in the distribution of expression of opioid receptors in the NAc as opioid-associated overdose deaths continue to increase2,3. Previous research has demonstrated that 25% of cells containing the delta opioid receptor (Oprd1) in the NAc also contained Met5-Enkaphalin31, a peptide encoded by the gene Penk. Penk is a marker gene for Drd2-expressing MSNs, suggesting that the delta opioid receptor is expressed in this population of neurons. Our data confirms this observation, as Oprd1 is highly expressed in the Drd2-MSN-1 population (Supp. Fig. 5a-c).
A major focus of this study was to characterize cell type-specific gene programs induced by cocaine regardless of exposure length. Independent of exposure type, the largest transcriptional response to cocaine experience occurred in the Drd1-MSN-1 population (Fig. 4a, b). These changes included IEGs such as Fosl2. IEGs and other cocaine-regulated genes in the Drd1-MSN-1 population are induced by both acute and repeated cocaine, but to a lesser extent with repeated cocaine. This data is in agreement with previous research that demonstrated induction of FOSB protein by repeated cocaine was weaker as compared to acute cocaine29. The second population of Drd1-expressing MSNs within the NAc, Drd1-MSN-2, did not have a robust transcriptional response to cocaine experience. A multitude of previous research has demonstrated that Drd1-expressing cells within the NAc exhibit transcriptional and epigenetic responses to drugs of abuse6,8,9,29,32. Thus, the identification of a population of Drd1-expressing MSNs in the NAc with a significantly attenuated transcriptional response to cocaine is intriguing because it highlights a previously underappreciated level of molecular heterogeneity within this population of cells. Notably, further analysis of population-specific DEGs also revealed an enrichment of calcium transport-related terms for Drd1-MSN-1 and potassium transport-related terms for Drd1-MSN-2. The differential enrichment for calcium-related terms and genes may explain the transcriptional response to cocaine in the Drd1-MSN-1 population, as many IEGs rely on calcium-dependent signaling cascades for induction.
Our dataset also provided the opportunity to identify marker genes for these two populations. We identified Ebf1 as a marker gene for the Drd1-MSN-1 population and Htr4 as a marker gene for the Drd1-MSN-2 population. In situ experiments validated the presence of two distinct populations of Drd1-expressing MSNs based on the presence of Htr4 and Ebf1. These in situ experiments also revealed a spatial separation of these MSNs, as Drd1+/Ebf1+ cells were primarily found in the NAc core and Drd1+/Htr4+ cells were primarily found in the NAc shell. Transcriptional similarity based on spatial location may also explain why the Drd1-MSN-1 population is more closely related to the Drd2-MSN-1 population than the Drd1-MSN-2 population (Supp. Fig. 4a). In fact, analysis of the relationship between cell types within the NHP identifies that Drd1- and Drd2-expressing MSNs from the same striatal subregions are more closely related than Drd1-expressing MSNs found in distinct striatal compartments (Supp. Fig. 4b). Similarly, the MSN.D1_A and MSN.D2_A human populations are more closely related to each other than other Drd1- or Drd2- expressing MSNs, although no spatial information is available in that dataset (Supp. Fig. 4c). Together, these results suggest that at least some component of transcriptional diversity in the NAc reflects the spatial organization of this structure. Although sex differences in drug-induced behavioral adaptations have long been appreciated33-36, more recent research has also demonstrated sex-specific drug-induced molecular adaptations37. Our dataset includes nuclei from both male and female rats, and thus we examined sex-specific transcriptional responses to cocaine across cell populations within the NAc, again using the collapsed acute and repeated dataset to enable pseudobulk treatment comparisons between male and females. In general, the direction of cocaine-induced mRNA changes was largely concordant between males and females across most cell populations (Supp. Fig. 6a-d), however significance criteria were often only met for one sex (Supp. Table 3). Overall, the Drd1-MSN-1 population was the most transcriptionally responsive to cocaine for both sexes in terms of total number of genes altered. Consistent with the sex-combined identification of cocaine DEGs, immediate early gene Nr4a3, transcription elongation factor Ell2, and cytoskeletal regulator Elmo2 were all significantly elevated in the Drd1-MSN-1 population in both sexes (Supp. Fig. 6e). Interestingly, sex-specific cocaine DEG comparisons revealed that while some genes, like Nr4a3 and Ell2, display relatively consistent patterns of expression between males and females across populations (Supp. Fig. 6e-f), other genes like Hs6st3 exhibit more dynamic patterns of expression (Supp. Fig. 6g).
In conclusion, we have generated a comprehensive transcriptional atlas of the rat NAc that also provides information regarding cocaine-dependent gene expression changes. The use of snRNA-seq provided the ability to understand cell types that potentially mediate cellular and behavioral responses to drugs of abuse. Analysis of this dataset resulted in the identification of transcriptionally distinct populations of Drd1-expressing MSNs that differ by their spatial location and transcriptional response to cocaine. This dataset will be a resource for future research into transcriptionally distinct populations of NAc cells and their responses to drugs of abuse.
METHODS
Behavioral testing.
All experiments were performed in accordance with the University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Male or female adult rats were intraperitoneally injected with Cocaine hydrocholoride at a dose of 20mg/kg or saline. Locomotor testing was performed as previously described6. Animals undergoing acute cocaine exposure received a single dose, while those undergoing repeated cocaine exposure received one injection per day for 7 days.
Single-nuclei dissociation.
Nuclei dissociation for snRNA-seq was performed as previously described6. Nuclei from 4 animals of the same sex, treatment group, and exposure length were pooled for tissue preparation and loaded into a single GEM (gel beads in emulsion) well.
snRNA-seq Analysis Methods.
Libraries were constructed according to manufacturer’s instructions using the Chromium Single Cell 3’ Library Construction Kit (10x Genomics, catalog no. 1000092), which uses version 3 chemistry for gene expression. Nuclei (15,655) from adult rat NAc after acute cocaine and nuclei (23,599) from adult rat NAc after repeated cocaine were sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq 500 at the UAB Heflin Genomics core to a depth of ~39,000 reads per nuclei and ~22,000 reads per nuclei, respectively. All raw fastq files were aligned to the Ensembl mRatBn7.2 (Rn7) genome using CellRanger (v6.1.2) with the associated Ensembl gene transfer format (gtf) file (version 105). Cell Ranger filtered outputs were analyzed with Seurat v4.0.438 using R v4.0.2. Nuclei containing <200 features and >5% of reads mapping to the mitochondrial genome were removed from further analysis. Molecular count data from each GEM (gel beads in emulsion) well were then log-normalized with a scaling factor of 10,000. Following normalization, and before dimensionality reduction, all GEM wells were then integrated with FindIntegrationAnchors() and IntegrateData using 17 principal components (PCs) and a resolution value of 0.1 for both the acute and repeated datasets. Local Inverse Simpson’s Index was calculated to ensure successful integration of all 8 GEM wells using lisi v1.0 with default parameters. Recent research has demonstrated that ambient RNA can be captured with single cells or nuclei with droplet-based single-cell/single-nucleus technologies. To avoid interpreting any signal associated with ambient RNA, we used SoupX v1.5.239 to remove any signal associated with ambient RNA. Droplet based single-cell/single-nucleus technologies are also susceptible to the capture of “doublets”, or two cells/nuclei being captured within a single droplet. Homotypic doublets, or doublets containing two cells of the same cell-type, are difficult to identify and remove. However, heterotypic doublets, or doublets containing two cells of different cell types, can be identified as cells that have a combination of cell type-specific transcriptional signatures. Heterotypic doublets were not identified in our acute dataset. However, heterotypic doublets were identified and removed from the repeated dataset using DoubletFinder v2.0.340. For differential expression testing, gene counts were first summed across GEM wells within each cell type to create a pseudobulked gene expression matrix. Any genes with counts <5 were removed from further analysis. Differential expression testing was then completed using pseudobulked gene expression matrices with DESeq2 v1.28.141 using the Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT). To identify differentially expressed genes across genetic sex and cell types, dataset and treatment were used as covariates. To identify differentially expressed genes across treatment conditions, dataset was used as a covariate. Gini coefficients were calculated using the gini() function that is available in the reldist v1.6-6 package42,43. Rank-rank hypergeometric overlap (RRHO) was calculated using the log2 (Fold Change) of all genes regardless of adjusted p-value. RRHO heatmaps were generated using RRHO2 v1.030,44. Molecular function gene ontology terms were generated with DEGs expressed in >10% of the cluster using g:GOSt made available by gProfiler45. For this tool, the statistical domain scope set to “Only annotated genes” and significance threshold set to “Benjamini-Hochberg” FDR. All R code for this analysis is available at https://github.com/Jeremy-Day-Lab/Phillips_2023_NAc.
Calculation of t-statistic for conservation analysis.
To correlate gene expression signatures across mammalian species, DEGs for rat cell types were first calculated using a pseudobulk approach. DEGs were then concatenated and t-statistics for every gene in every MSN subtype were calculated. The t-statistic was calculated with the following formula:
where is the mean expression value of the gene in the cell type of interest, is the mean expression value of all other cells, N is the number of nuclei in the cell type of interest, and Spooled is the pooled standard deviation according to:
Following calculation of t-statistics, the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated using the cor() function in R. All R code for this analysis is available at https://github.com/Jeremy-Day-Lab/Phillips_2023_NAc.
Tissue Preparation and RNAscope.
Upon sacrifice, brains from 6 drug-naïve Sprague-Dawley rats (3F/3M) were extracted and immediately placed in isopentane at −40°C for 30 seconds. Tissue was stored at −80°C until day of sectioning. On day of sectioning, tissue was allowed to equilibrate at −20°C for 40 minutes and 10μm coronal sections containing the NAc (1.92mm to 1.44mm from bregma) were collected using Leica cryostat and mounted on room temperature slides. Sections were air dried on dry ice for 60 minutes, then stored at −80°C. Sections were prepared for RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent v2 Assay according to manufacturer’s protocol (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, 323110)23. Probes included Htr4-C2 (544081-C2), and Drd1a-C3 (317031-C3) diluted 1:50 in Ebf1-C1 (891561-C1) and DAPI (320858). Associated Opal dyes were 690 (FP1497001KT) for Ebf1-C1, 570 (FP1488001KT) for Htr4-C2, and 520 (FP1487001KT) for Drd1a-C3 diluted 1:500 in TSA buffer. Sections were imaged using Keyence BZ-X800 microscope with OP-87767 filter cubes for GFP, Texas Red PE, DAPI, and Cy5 at 20x (PlanFluor NA 0.75) and 100x (PlanApo NA 1.45) magnifications. 20x images were stitched using the BZ-X800 Analyzer software.
Image Analysis.
Stitched images were analyzed using ImageJ2 V2.9.0/1.53t46. Briefly, NAc-specific nuclei ROIs were generated based on DAPI channel image for each section using StarDist2d Versatile (fluorescent nuclei) plugin47. DAPI ROIs were applied to the other channels containing signals associated with Ebf1, Htr4, and Drd1a probes. Signal intensity for each channel, normalized and rescaled from 0-100 for each animal and probe, was measured to identify Drd1a+, Drd1a+/Ebf1+, Drd1a+/Htr4+, and Drd1a+/Htr4+/Ebf1+ populations.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank all current and former Day Lab members for assistance and support. This work was supported by NIH grants DP1DA039650, R01MH114990, R01DA053743, and R01DA054714 and the McKnight Foundation Neurobiology of Brain Disorders Award (JJD). L.I. is supported by the Civitan International Research Center at UAB. We acknowledge support from the University of Alabama at Birmingham Biological Data Science Core (RRID:SCR_021766), the UAB Heflin Center for Genomic Sciences, and the UAB Flow Cytometry & Single Cell Core Facility. We would also like to thank Nathaniel J. Robinson for his input for calculating the t-statistic from gene expression data for cross-species comparisons.
Footnotes
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare no competing interests.
DATA AVAILABILITY
All snRNA-seq datasets have been deposited on NCBI GEO for download (GSE137763, GSE222418). A publicly accessible and searchable online resource for these datasets is available at http://day-lab.org/resources.
REFERENCES
- 1.Cisneros I. E. & Cunningham K. A. Covid-19 interface with drug misuse and substance use disorders. Neuropharmacology 198, 108766 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hedegaard H., Miniño A. M., Spencer M. R. & Warner M. Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 1999–2020. (National Center for Health Statistics, 2021). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ciccarone D. The rise of illicit fentanyls, stimulants and the fourth wave of the opioid overdose crisis. Curr Opin Psychiatry 34, 344–350 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Day J. J., Roitman M. F., Wightman R. M. & Carelli R. M. Associative learning mediates dynamic shifts in dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1020–1028 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Giros B., Jaber M., Jones S. R., Wightman R. M. & Caron M. G. Hyperlocomotion and indifference to cocaine and amphetamine in mice lacking the dopamine transporter. Nature 379, 606–612 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Savell K. E. et al. A dopamine-induced gene expression signature regulates neuronal function and cocaine response. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba4221 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nishi A., Kuroiwa M. & Shuto T. Mechanisms for the modulation of dopamine d(1) receptor signaling in striatal neurons. Front. Neuroanat. 5, 43 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bertran-Gonzalez J. et al. Opposing patterns of signaling activation in dopamine D1 and D2 receptor-expressing striatal neurons in response to cocaine and haloperidol. J. Neurosci. 28, 5671–5685 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang J. et al. c-Fos facilitates the acquisition and extinction of cocaine-induced persistent changes. J. Neurosci. 26, 13287–13296 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nestler E. J., Barrot M. & Self D. W. DeltaFosB: a sustained molecular switch for addiction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 11042–11046 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Carpenter M. D. et al. Nr4a1 suppresses cocaine-induced behavior via epigenetic regulation of homeostatic target genes. Nat. Commun. 11, 504 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ribeiro E. A. et al. Transcriptional and physiological adaptations in nucleus accumbens somatostatin interneurons that regulate behavioral responses to cocaine. Nat. Commun. 9, 3149 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Witten I. B. et al. Cholinergic interneurons control local circuit activity and cocaine conditioning. Science 330, 1677–1681 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang J. et al. Cocaine Triggers Astrocyte-Mediated Synaptogenesis. Biol. Psychiatry 89, 386–397 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Corkrum M. et al. Dopamine-Evoked Synaptic Regulation in the Nucleus Accumbens Requires Astrocyte Activity. Neuron 105, 1036–1047.e5 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen R. et al. Decoding molecular and cellular heterogeneity of mouse nucleus accumbens. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 1757–1771 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.He J. et al. Transcriptional and anatomical diversity of medium spiny neurons in the primate striatum. Curr. Biol. 31, 5473–5486.e6 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tran M. N. et al. Single-nucleus transcriptome analysis reveals cell-type-specific molecular signatures across reward circuitry in the human brain. Neuron 109, 3088–3103.e5 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kawaguchi Y. Physiological, morphological, and histochemical characterization of three classes of interneurons in rat neostriatum. J. Neurosci. 13, 4908–4923 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lobo M. K., Yeh C. & Yang X. W. Pivotal role of early B-cell factor 1 in development of striatonigral medium spiny neurons in the matrix compartment. J. Neurosci. Res. 86, 2134–2146 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jongen-Rêlo A. L., Voorn P. & Groenewegen H. J. Immunohistochemical characterization of the shell and core territories of the nucleus accumbens in the rat. Eur. J. Neurosci. 6, 1255–1264 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jean A. et al. The nucleus accumbens 5-HTR4-CART pathway ties anorexia to hyperactivity. Transl. Psychiatry 2, e203 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang F. et al. RNAscope: a novel in situ RNA analysis platform for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. J Mol Diagn 14, 22–29 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Squair J. W. et al. Confronting false discoveries in single-cell differential expression. Nat. Commun. 12, 5692 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shelkar G. P., Gandhi P. J., Liu J. & Dravid S. M. Cocaine preference and neuroadaptations are maintained by astrocytic NMDA receptors in the nucleus accumbens. Sci. Adv. 8, eabo6574 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Reissner K. J. & Kalivas P. W. Using glutamate homeostasis as a target for treating addictive disorders. Behav. Pharmacol. 21, 514–522 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kalivas P. W. The glutamate homeostasis hypothesis of addiction. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 561–572 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mahmoud S., Gharagozloo M., Simard C. & Gris D. Astrocytes Maintain Glutamate Homeostasis in the CNS by Controlling the Balance between Glutamate Uptake and Release. Cells 8, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang D. et al. Repeated cocaine administration induces gene expression changes through the dopamine D1 receptors. Neuropsychopharmacology 30, 1443–1454 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cahill K. M., Huo Z., Tseng G. C., Logan R. W. & Seney M. L. Improved identification of concordant and discordant gene expression signatures using an updated rank-rank hypergeometric overlap approach. Sci. Rep. 8, 9588 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Svingos A. L., Clarke C. L. & Pickel V. M. Cellular sites for activation of delta-opioid receptors in the rat nucleus accumbens shell: relationship with Met5-enkephalin. J. Neurosci. 18, 1923–1933 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zipperly M. E. et al. Regulation of dopamine-dependent transcription and cocaine action by Gadd45b. Neuropsychopharmacology 46, 709–720 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hu M., Crombag H. S., Robinson T. E. & Becker J. B. Biological basis of sex differences in the propensity to self-administer cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 29, 81–85 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bobzean S. A. M., DeNobrega A. K. & Perrotti L. I. Sex differences in the neurobiology of drug addiction. Exp. Neurol. 259, 64–74 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Becker J. B. & Chartoff E. Sex differences in neural mechanisms mediating reward and addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 44, 166–183 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Evans S. M. The role of estradiol and progesterone in modulating the subjective effects of stimulants in humans. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 15, 418–426 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.López A. J. et al. Cocaine self-administration induces sex-dependent protein expression in the nucleus accumbens. Commun. Biol. 4, 883 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hao Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587.e29 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Young M. D. & Behjati S. SoupX removes ambient RNA contamination from droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing data. Gigascience 9, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.McGinnis C. S., Murrow L. M. & Gartner Z. J. DoubletFinder: Doublet Detection in Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data Using Artificial Nearest Neighbors. Cell Syst. 8, 329–337.e4 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Love M. I., Huber W. & Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gini C. Measurement of inequality of incomes. The Economic Journal 31, 124 (1921). [Google Scholar]
- 43.Handcock M. S. & Morris M. Relative Distribution Methods in the Social Sciences (Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences). 280 (Springer, 1999). [Google Scholar]
- 44.Plaisier S. B., Taschereau R., Wong J. A. & Graeber T. G. Rank-rank hypergeometric overlap: identification of statistically significant overlap between gene-expression signatures. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e169 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Raudvere U. et al. g:Profiler: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W191–W198 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rueden C. T. et al. ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinformatics 18, 529 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Schmidt U., Weigert M., Broaddus C. & Myers G. in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2018: 21st International Conference, Granada, Spain, September 16-20, 2018, Proceedings, Part II (eds. Frangi A. F., Schnabel J. A., Davatzikos C., Alberola-Lopez C. & Fichtinger G.) 11071, 265–273 (Springer International Publishing, 2018). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All snRNA-seq datasets have been deposited on NCBI GEO for download (GSE137763, GSE222418). A publicly accessible and searchable online resource for these datasets is available at http://day-lab.org/resources.