Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2023 Jan 18:2023.01.17.523348. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2023.01.17.523348

Table 1.

Characteristics of the Sample at Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P)

All CHR-P individuals
Age, years, mean (SD) 20.75 (4.74)
Female Sex, number (%) 631 (47.09%)
SIPS Positive Symptoms Score, mean (SD)a 10.93 (4.66)
CAARMS Positive Symptoms Scores, mean (SD)b 10.37 (4.03)
IQ, mean z-score (SD)c −0.21 (1.00)
Prescribed Antipsychotic Medication, number (%)d 243 (18.63%)
Months of follow-up, mean (SD)e 19.71 (13.97)
Converters, N (%)e 157 (14.31%)
CHR-P individuals that converted to a psychotic disorder
Age, years, mean (SD) 20.09 (4.68)
Female Sex, number (%) 64 (40.76%)
SIPS Positive Symptoms Score, mean (SD)f 12.12 (5.06)
CAARMS Positive Symptoms Scores, mean (SD)f 10.71 (4.24)
IQ, mean z-score (SD)g −0.29 (1.03)
Prescribed Antipsychotic Medication, number (%)h 32 (20.38%)

CAARMS = Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States; SIPS = Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes; SD = standard Deviation. Positive symptom ratings at the time of scanning were available for the entire sample (N = 1340), assessed either with SIPS or CAARMS;

a

SIPS was used to assess CHR-P status in 806 CHR-P participants

b

CAARMS was used to assess CHR-P status in 534 CHR-P participants

c

Estimates of IQ were available in 924 CHR-P participants; z-scores were used to accommodate site differences in the instruments used (eTable 1)

d

Medication status at the time of scanning was available in 1304 CHR-P individuals

e

Conversion status was known for 1097 CHR-P participants but information about the length of the follow-up period was available for 975 CHR-P individuals

f

SIPS and CAARMS were respectively used to assess 115 and 42 individuals who converted

g

IQ estimates were available in 109 CHR-P individuals that converted

h

Medication status was available in 157 CHR-P individuals that converted