Abstract
An ileostomy is associated with multiple complications that may frequently or persistently affect the life of ostomates. All healthcare professionals should have knowledge of the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of ileostomy complications. Peristomal dermatitis is caused by watery and highly alkaline effluent. Skin protective products are typically used for local treatment. Ischemia/necrosis occurs due to insufficient arterial blood supply. Retraction is seen in patients with a bulky mesentery and occurs following ischemia. Convex stoma appliances can be used for skin protection against fecal leakage. Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is common and occurs only at the stoma site. Trans-stomal decompression is most effective in these cases. High output stoma (HOS) is defined as a condition when the output exceeds 1,000- 2,000 ml/day, lasting for one to three days. Treatment includes intravenous fluid and electrolyte resuscitation followed by restriction of hypotonic fluid and the use of antimotility (and antisecretory) drugs. Stomal prolapse is a full-thickness protrusion of an inverted bowel. Manual reduction is attempted initially, whereas emergency bowel resection may be needed for incarcerated cases. A parastomal hernia (PSH) is an incisional hernia of the stoma site. Surgery is considered in cases of incarceration, but most cases are manageable with non-surgical treatment.
Keywords: ileostomy, end ileostomy, diverting stoma, covering ileostomy, complications
Introduction and background
An ileostomy is performed in either an end or loop fashion based on the pathology that necessitated stoma creation. An end ileostomy is indicated when the stoma becomes the most distal part after a large area of the bowel is resected, or no reconstructive procedure was made for the bowel continuity (e.g., "Brooke ileostomy" after proctocolectomy for inflammatory bowel diseases). Diverting stoma (DI) is essentially created with a loop formation, which protects the anastomosis from leakage and facilitates healing in patients undergoing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer or restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. DI has been preferred over diverting colostomy (DC) due to a lower incidence of surgical site infections, stomal prolapse, retraction, parastomal hernia, and incisional hernias [1]. Further, DI is advantageous compared to DC in terms of a technically easier stoma reversal. However, ileostomy is associated with stoma-related complications such as dehydration or peristomal dermatitis, which may repeatedly or persistently affect the life of ostomates [1, 2]. Therefore, surgeons, nurses, and all stoma care providers should have knowledge about the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of ileostomy complications to maintain the best quality of care and mitigate the consequences of complications.
Review
Methods
An electronic English literature search was performed using the PubMed/MEDLINE database for articles published from the inception to November 30th, 2022. The search terms included "end ileostomy", "diverting ileostomy", or "covering ileostomy", and "complications". Inclusion criteria for the article type were systematic reviews and meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, retrospective observational studies, and narrative reviews focused on nursing practice. Case reports, editorials, and letters to the editor were not included.
Ileostomy complications
Peristomal dermatitis
The skin complication associated with ileostomy is peristomal dermatitis. The output from an ileostomy is watery, highly alkaline, and contains proteolytic enzymes that constantly irritate the peristomal skin [3]. Exposure to the effluent causes loss of epidermal integrity and maceration, which leads to painful ulceration [3, 4] (Figures 1, 2). Barrier rings/seals, skin barrier powder, paste, and paste strips are useful for local treatment [5]. Convex stoma appliances can be used for those with low stoma height. The best method to prevent peristomal dermatitis is to create a properly protruding ileostomy with a 2-3 cm height [3, 4].
Ischemia/necrosis
Ischemia/necrosis typically occurs within 24 hours after stoma construction and begins with discoloration of the mucocutaneous junction at the site (Figure 3). A newly constructed stoma appears darkish and edematous with early venous congestion in the mesentery, which must be distinguished from the insufficient arterial blood supply when the edema subsides. Ileostomy carries a very low risk of necrosis because of its dense vascular network, and its incidence is reportedly as low as 1-5% [4]. If ischemia/necrosis is superficial within a subcutaneous layer, a 'watch and wait' policy may be effective, but mucocutaneous separation may occur. If it is limited above the fascia, immediate stomal revision may not be needed; however, care must be taken for delayed progression of stenosis. If it extends deeper below the fascia, emergency reconstruction should be performed. Avoiding injury to the peristomal vessels and tension in the mesentery are crucial preventive measures at the time of stoma creation.
Retraction
The stoma appears depressed at or under the skin level when the bowel is pulled invertedly towards the abdominal wall (Figure 4). This is termed retraction, and its reported incidence is 2.9-17%, with a decreasing trend in recent years [4, 6, 7]. The most common risk factor is tension in the mesentery. Retraction is also frequently seen in patients with high body mass index, in whom fat mesentery and well-developed panniculus cause a 'downforce effect' to the mucocutaneous junction.
Convex stoma appliances can be used to decrease the severity of skin damage caused by fecal leakage. Stoma rods have traditionally been used; however, recent studies have shown that rods do not reduce the incidence of retraction but increase adverse events, including edema, abscess, bleeding, necrosis, and dermatitis [6, 8]. Stomal revision is the definitive treatment for this condition. Prevention involves obtaining an adequate length of the mesentery with a good blood supply.
Small bowel obstruction
Small bowel obstruction (SBO) frequently occurs in the early postoperative period after colorectal surgery, and its incidence significantly increases to 23% when DI is created [9-11]. SBO at the stoma site is often called stoma outlet obstruction (SOO) or stoma-related obstruction (SRO). Ulcerative colitis, increased operative time, stoma limb rotation, and thick rectus abdominis muscle have been shown to be risk factors. SOO/SRO is diagnosed by excluding SBO other than at the stoma site [12-14] (Figures 5, 6). Local treatment with trans-stomal decompression is most effective (Figure 7), and immediate surgical intervention is rarely required. Early stoma closure may be scheduled in recurrent cases. Preventive techniques have been controversial, and some reports have advocated that the distance between the stoma site and anastomosis must be long enough to avoid tension or kinking [15, 16], whereas some have recommended suture fixation of the stoma to the abdominal wall [17, 18].
High output stoma
The normal output volume of ileostomy varies from 600 to 1,200 ml/day and is influenced by the digestion of liquid and food [19, 20]. When it exceeds the normal limit, dehydration with electrolyte imbalance occurs, and acute and/or chronic renal impairment may be induced. This is called a high output stoma (HOS) and is inconsistently defined in the literature when the output exceeds 2,000ml/day for three or more consecutive days [19], 1,500ml/day for two consecutive days [21], 2,000ml/day [22], or 1,000ml/day for more than three consecutive days [23]. Patients typically present with weight loss, dry mouth, thirst, reduced urinary output, and decreased blood pressure. Laboratory testing typically shows hypomagnesemia and depletion of sodium in the urinary output [20]. The incidence of HOS is approximately 16% [19, 21], and there are multiple risk factors, including short bowel, diabetes, medication (metformin, prokinetic drugs, or sudden withdrawal of steroids or opiates), Clostridium difficile infection, intra-abdominal sepsis, and bowel obstruction [19, 24].
Fluid balance checks and electrolyte monitoring are mandatory for the treatment of HOS. It is necessary to exclude underlying pathologies other than stoma, such as enteritis, intra-abdominal sepsis, or bowel obstruction. Rapid fluid resuscitation is required to prevent acute renal failure due to severe dehydration. The intake of hypotonic fluid (water, coffee, tea, or juice) must be restricted to 500-1,000 ml/day in order to preclude further increases in output [19, 20]. Antimotility drugs (loperamide) are generally used as the initial medication, while antisecretory drugs (H2 antagonists or proton pump inhibitors) are used to reduce gastrointestinal secretion. Hypomagnesemia is treated with oral or intravenous supplementation. Early stoma closure should be considered in refractory cases. The keys to prevention are early recognition and interventions for dehydration. In-hospital and outpatient protocols have been suggested, consisting of output monitoring, guidance for liquid and food intake, and patient interviews using telecommunication tools [25-27].
Stomal prolapse
Stomal prolapse is defined as a full-thickness protrusion of the stoma (Figure 8). Inversely protruding bowel may compromise stoma care. Stomal prolapse occurs in 3-11% of ileostomies [4, 28]. Redundant and mobile stoma limbs and a wide trephine at the stoma site have been proposed as risk factors [29]. When prolapse occurs, a manual reduction is attempted, but its effect is mostly temporary. Reducible prolapse does not require further intervention, whereas non-reducible prolapse often requires painful and durative manual reduction. The slug method is a unique procedure for manual reduction, in which 50% glucose solution is applied to the prolapsed edematous mucosa [30]. Increased peristalsis and fluid exudation from the mucosa assist in manual reduction.
In cases of incarcerated prolapse, emergency surgery is indicated, and the ischemic bowel must be resected. Many surgical techniques have been proposed, including local repair, revision, or relocation with laparotomy [29, 31-33]. Among these procedures, local repair using a stapler device appears to be less invasive, with the lowest recurrence rate of 4% [29]; however, the majority of the reports were retrospective studies with a relatively small number of patients. Therefore, further prospective studies with longer follow-up periods are warranted. Methods for preventing stomal prolapse have not yet been established.
Parastomal hernia
A parastomal hernia (PSH) is an incisional hernia of the stoma site (Figures 9, 10). According to the literature, its incidence varies to as high as 48%, depending on the stoma type [4, 28]. Generally, ileostomy has a lower incidence of PSH than colostomy, and the incidence of PSH in loop ileostomy is 1.5% [2]. The symptoms of PSH include pain, peristomal discomfort, and difficulty in fitting pouch appliances, resulting in fecal leakage. Numerous risk factors contribute to the development of PSH, including patient-related factors (obesity, elderly, smoking, use of steroids, constipation, less exercise, chronic obstructive lung disease, etc.) and technical surgical factors (inappropriate stoma site selection, oversizing fascial trephine, emergency surgery, etc.) [32, 34].
In the case of temporary ileostomies, such as DI, nonoperative management is recommended with the use of a supporting belt, weight control, and exercise. Surgery is considered for patients presenting with an incarcerated bowel obstruction. Nonoperative management may be a better option for patients with concomitant disease or without complaints, considering the high recurrence rate requiring additional surgery for those who underwent PSH repair [35]. A prophylactic mesh may reduce the incidence of PSH if placed at the time of the index surgery [36]; however, it may not be necessary for DI patients for whom stoma closure is expected shortly after its creation.
Conclusions
Certain ileostomy complications can be prevented by surgeons during stoma creation. However, inevitable complications do exist due to the nature of ileostomy. Therefore, perioperative patient evaluation and education, in-hospital assessment, and postoperative surveillance protocols provided by a multidisciplinary team are crucial for early recognition and appropriate management of ileostomy complications.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Editage for the English editing of the manuscript.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
Footnotes
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
- 1.Postoperative morbidity and mortality after anterior resection with preventive diverting loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for rectal cancer: a updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Du R, Zhou J, Tong G, et al. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47:1514–1525. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.A meta-analysis of the role of diverting ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery. Ahmad NZ, Abbas MH, Khan SU, Parvaiz A. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021;36:445–455. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03771-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Intestinal stomas-postoperative stoma care and peristomal skin complications. Steinhagen E, Colwell J, Cannon LM. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017;30:184–192. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stoma complications: a literature overview. Shabbir J, Britton DC. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:958–964. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02006.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lessons learned about peristomal skin complications: secondary analysis of the ADVOCATE trial. Salvadalena G, Colwell JC, Skountrianos G, Pittman J. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2020;47:357–363. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.The use of a stoma rod/bridge to prevent retraction: a systematic review. Gialamas E, Meyer J, Abbassi Z, Popeskou S, Buchs NC, Ris F. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2021;48:39–43. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Current management of intestinal stomas and their complications. Tsujinaka S, Tan KY, Miyakura Y, Fukano R, Oshima M, Konishi F, Rikiyama T. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2020;4:25–33. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2019-032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stoma rods in abdominal surgery: a systematic review and metaanalyses. Mohan HM, Pasquali A, O'Neill B, Collins D, Winter DC. Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23:201–206. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-01935-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Morbidity related to diverting ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis. Karjalainen EK, Renkonen-Sinisalo L, Mustonen HK, Lepistö AH. Colorectal Dis. 2019;21:671–678. doi: 10.1111/codi.14573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Risk factors for early postoperative small bowel obstruction after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Suwa K, Ushigome T, Ohtsu M, et al. World J Surg. 2018;42:233–238. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4152-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Intraoperative maneuvers may affect the development of early postoperative small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: multicenter prospective cohort study. Nakamura Y, Matsuda K, Yokoyama S, et al. Int J Surg. 2021;86:52–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Risk factors for postoperative stoma outlet obstruction in ulcerative colitis. Kitahara T, Sato Y, Oshiro T, Matsunaga R, Nagashima M, Okazumi S. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;12:507–519. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i12.507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Elevated risk of stoma outlet obstruction following colorectal surgery in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a retrospective cohort study. Okada S, Hata K, Emoto S, et al. Surg Today. 2018;48:1060–1067. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1698-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Risk factors for outlet obstruction after laparoscopic surgery and diverting ileostomy for rectal cancer. Sasaki S, Nagasaki T, Oba K, et al. Surg Today. 2021;51:366–373. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02096-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Risk factors and management of stoma-related obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal surgery with diverting ileostomy. Maemoto R, Tsujinaka S, Miyakura Y, et al. Asian J Surg. 2021;44:1037–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Risk factors of small bowel obstruction following total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis with diverting loop-ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Mizushima T, Kameyama H, Watanabe K, et al. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017;1:122–128. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Loop ileostomy fixation: a simple technique to minimise the risk of stomal volvulus. Anderson DN, Driver CP, Park KG, Davidson AI, Keenan RA. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1994;9:138–140. doi: 10.1007/BF00290190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Obstructive complications of laparoscopically created defunctioning ileostomy. Ng KH, Ng DC, Cheung HY, Wong JC, Yau KK, Chung CC, Li MK. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1664–1668. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9351-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Causes and management of a high-output stoma. Baker ML, Williams RN, Nightingale JM. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:191–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02107.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.How to manage a high-output stoma. Nightingale JM. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022;13:140–151. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-101108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Protocol for the detection and nutritional management of high-output stomas. Arenas Villafranca JJ, López-Rodríguez C, Abilés J, Rivera R, Gándara Adán N, Utrilla Navarro P. Nutr J. 2015;14:45. doi: 10.1186/s12937-015-0034-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Postoperative diarrhea and high ostomy output impact postoperative outcomes after elective colon and rectal operations regardless of Clostridium difficile infection. Gaertner WB, Madoff RD, Mellgren A, Kwaan MR, Melton GB. Am J Surg. 2015;210:759–765. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.03.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Assessment of risk factors for the occurrence of a high-output ileostomy. Seifarth C, Augustin LN, Lehmann KS, Stroux A, Lauscher JC, Kreis ME, Holmer C. Front Surg. 2021;8:642288. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.642288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Factors predictive of high-output ileostomy: a retrospective single-center comparative study. Takeda M, Takahashi H, Haraguchi N, et al. Surg Today. 2019;49:482–487. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1756-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Decreasing readmissions after ileostomy creation through a perioperative quality improvement program. Hsu AT, Crawford TC, Zhou X, et al. Dis Colon Rectum. 2022;65:0–804. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Decreasing hospital readmission in ileostomy patients: results of novel pilot program. Shaffer VO, Owi T, Kumarusamy MA, et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224:425–430. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ileostomy pathway virtually eliminates readmissions for dehydration in new ostomates. Nagle D, Pare T, Keenan E, Marcet K, Tizio S, Poylin V. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:1266–1272. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827080c1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stoma complications. Krishnamurty DM, Blatnik J, Mutch M. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017;30:193–200. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Outcomes of stapler repair with anastomosis for stoma prolapse. Koide Y, Maeda K, Katsuno H, et al. Surg Today. 2021;51:226–231. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02076-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Slug method: a technique for stoma prolapse reduction using high osmolality of the 50% glucose solution. Watanabe K, Kohyama A, Suzuki H, et al. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63:0. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Surgical management of stomal prolapse - is there a superior approach to repair? Mittal R, Jalouta T, Luchtefeld M, Ogilvie J Jr. Am J Surg. 2020;220:1010–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.02.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mid-term efficacy of local repair using modified Altemeier technique for stomal prolapse: a case series. Tsujinaka S, Kakizawa N, Hatsuzawa Y, et al. Cureus. 2022;14:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.The modified Altemeier procedure for a loop colostomy prolapse. Watanabe M, Murakami M, Ozawa Y, et al. Surg Today. 2015;45:1463–1466. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1194-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Parastomal hernia rates and exercise following ostomy surgery. Park J, Rivard SJ, Maguire L, Varlamos C, Duby A, Hendren S. Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Non-operative treatment as a strategy for patients with parastomal hernia: a multicentre, retrospective cohort study. Kroese LF, Lambrichts DP, Jeekel J, et al. Colorectal Dis. 2018;20:545–551. doi: 10.1111/codi.13962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Prosthetic mesh placement for the prevention of parastomal herniation. Jones HG, Rees M, Aboumarzouk OM, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7:0. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008905.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]