Skip to main content
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy logoLink to Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
. 2022 Dec 12;78(2):411–417. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac403

Prevalence and characterization of piperaquine, mefloquine and artemisinin derivatives triple-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Cambodia

Mélissa Mairet-Khedim 1,2,#, Camille Roesch 3,4,#, Nimol Khim 5,6, Sreynet Srun 7,8, Anthony Bouillon 9,10, Saorin Kim 11,12, Sopheakvatey Ke 13,14, Chhayleang Kauy 15,16, Nimol Kloeung 17,18, Rotha Eam 19,20, Chanra Khean 21,22, Chanvong Kul 23,24, Sophy Chy 25,26, Rithea Leang 27, Pascal Ringwald 28, Jean-Christophe Barale 29,30,3, Benoit Witkowski 31,32,✉,3
PMCID: PMC9890270  PMID: 36508338

Abstract

Background

In early 2016, in Preah Vihear, Northern Cambodia, artesunate/mefloquine was used to cope with dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum parasites. Following this policy, P. falciparum strains harbouring molecular markers associated with artemisinin, piperaquine and mefloquine resistance have emerged. However, the lack of a viable alternative led Cambodia to adopt artesunate/mefloquine countrywide, raising concerns about a surge of triple-resistant P. falciparum strains.

Objectives

To assess the prevalence of triple-resistant parasites after artesunate/mefloquine implementation countrywide in Cambodia and to characterize their phenotype.

Methods

For this multicentric study, 846 samples were collected from 2016 to 2019. Genotyping of molecular markers associated with artemisinin, piperaquine and mefloquine resistance was coupled with phenotypic analyses.

Results

Only four triple-resistant P. falciparum isolates (0.47%) were identified during the study period. These parasites combined the pfk13 polymorphism with pfmdr1 amplification, pfpm2 amplification and/or pfcrt mutations. They showed significantly higher tolerance to artemisinin, piperaquine and mefloquine and also to the mefloquine and piperaquine combination.

Conclusions

The use of artesunate/mefloquine countrywide in Cambodia has not led to a massive increase of triple-resistant P. falciparum parasites. However, these parasites circulate in the population, and exhibit clear resistance to piperaquine, mefloquine and their combination in vitro. This study demonstrates that P. falciparum can adapt to more complex drug associations, which should be considered in future therapeutic designs.

Introduction

The initial hypothesis, according to which the emergence of resistance to artemisinin-based combination therapies was unlikely, has been contradicted by several reports from South East Asia, particularly in the framework of dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine use in Cambodia. Resistance to the dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine combination was first linked to the concomitant presence of the K13 C580Y haplotype (a marker of artemisinin resistance) and pfpm2 amplification (piperaquine resistance).1,2,3 In addition, the extended piperaquine pressure led to a secondary resistance mechanism through the selection of specific pfcrt polymorphisms.4,5 This resistance context led to the withdrawal of the dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine combination for malaria treatment in 2016. However, due to the lack of viable alternatives, the artesunate/mefloquine combination was reintroduced first in the Preah Vihear province (Northern Cambodia) in 2016. Shortly afterwards, a study showed the significant emergence of P. falciparum strains that concomitantly harboured resistance markers to artemisinin (K13 C580Y), piperaquine (pfpm2 amplification) and mefloquine (pfmdr1 amplification).6 This suggested that P. falciparum can become resistant to artesunate/mefloquine and dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine, a major challenge for malaria control in the Greater Mekong subregion. This rapid evolution of the parasites also brought a major concern regarding the following countrywide introduction achieved in 2017. However, this study was limited to only one Cambodian district and did not include any phenotypic characterization of these triple-mutant P. falciparum parasites.6 This left many open questions about the emergence and expansion dynamics of such triple-mutant parasites and their resistance profile. Therefore, we carried out a longitudinal and multicentric study in Cambodia to determine the dynamics of triple-mutant P. falciparum emergence and to phenotypically and genotypically characterize their resistance to artemisinin, mefloquine and piperaquine in the framework of artesunate/mefloquine reintroduction.

Methods

P. falciparum clinical isolates

P. falciparum isolates were from patients with uncomplicated P. falciparum-caused malaria enrolled in WHO therapeutic efficacy studies (2016–19). Venous blood was collected in acid-citrate-dextrose tubes (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). An aliquot (200 µL) of fresh blood was frozen at −20°C for DNA extraction, and the remaining blood was adapted to in vitro culture at 2% haematocrit (O+ human blood, Centre de Transfusion Sanguine, Phnom Penh, Cambodia) in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 0.5% AlbuMAX II, 2.5% human plasma (mixed serogroups), 5% CO2 and 5% O2, at 37°C. The P. falciparum 3D7 reference clone was obtained from the Malaria Research and Reference Reagent Resource Center and grown in the same conditions. In addition to the 2016–19 field isolates, three P. falciparum strains collected in 2012 and later characterized for harbouring the K13 C580Y mutation, and pfpm2 and pfmdr1 amplifications were included in the analyses.7

Determination of molecular resistance markers

The presence of the P. falciparum K13 (PF3D7_1343700 from codon 445 to 680) polymorphisms in the propeller domain was determined by dideoxy sequencing according to Ariey et al.2Pfmdr1 and pfpm2 copy number variations were determined by quantitative PCR according to Witkowski et al.3 with modification of the hybridization temperature to 63°C. The presence of pfcrt (PF3D7_0709000) polymorphisms (codons 93, 97, 145, 343 and 353) was determined by dideoxy sequencing using the primers described (Table S1, available as Supplementary data atJACOnline) or WGS data.

Pfpm2 and pfmdr1 gene expression

RNA was extracted from 100 µL of infected RBCs (5%–10% with P. falciparum rings 24–27 h post-invasion) with 1 mL of TRIzol followed by 200 µL of chloroform. After centrifugation at 12 000 g for 15 min, the aqueous phase was extracted and mixed with 100% ethanol. RNA was purified at 4°C using the RNeasy kit (QIAGEN), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The remaining genomic DNA was digested with DNase I (Promega). After reverse transcription of RNA to cDNA (Promega GoScript Reverse Transcriptase Kit), quantitative PCR was performed to measure pfmdr1 and pfpm2 gene expression, using fructose-bisphosphate aldolase (PF3D7_1444800) as housekeeping gene.3

Antibody production and western blot analysis

Three synthetic peptides, GKEQKEKKDGNLSIKEEV-Cys, Cys-HGTHDELLSAQDGIYKKYVKLAK and Cys-EAMENYYEENTNDT, which correspond to residues 2–19, 486–499 and 1398–1419 (C-terminus) of PfMDR1 primary sequence, respectively, were coupled to keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH) via the additional cysteine residue to immunize rabbits. The PepR3 antibody used in this study corresponds to a mix of the purified antibodies against the three peptides (ProteoGenix).

Protein extracts were prepared from the three pfk13/pfpm2/pfmdr1 triple-mutant strains collected in 2012 and two WT strains. Synchronized, 24–30 h post-invasion free trophozoites were prepared following two rounds of incubation with 0.002% saponin (Sigma), washed three times in PBS, and resuspended in sterile water supplemented with protease inhibitors (Complete, Roche). Soluble and insoluble P. falciparum proteins were obtained through two freezing/thawing cycles, and centrifugation at 16 100 g at 4°C for 30 min. Protein amounts equivalent to 0.25 × 106 and up to 4 × 106 parasites were separated and transferred, as previously described.8 Blots were incubated with primary antibodies followed by horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (Promega, 1/25000) and developed by chemiluminescence (Pierce). Primary antibodies were against rabbit Pf-PM2 (Ab737, 1/1000),9 Pf-MDR1 (purified PepR3, 1/1000; this study) and Pf-aldolase (HRP-coupled; Abcam, 1/10000), used as loading control. ChemiDoc and Image Lab (BioRad) were used to evaluate the relative amounts of the corresponding proteins.

Mefloquine, piperaquine and artemisinin in vitro susceptibility assays

Mefloquine was provided by the Worldwide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN) and prepared in dimethyl sulphoxide (Sigma–Aldrich, Singapore). The in vitro susceptibility of cultured parasites to mefloquine was determined using the H3-hypoxanthine uptake inhibition assay, as previously described, with modifications.10 Parasites were synchronized at the ring stage by incubation with 5% D-sorbitol (0–12 h post-invasion) and exposed to mefloquine at different concentrations (2 to 1500 nM) in the presence of 0.5 µCi of H3-hypoxanthine (PerkinElmer, Waltham, USA) for 48 h. Tritium incorporation was measured with a β-counter (MicroBetaTriLux; PerkinElmer Waltham, USA). The IC50 was determined using the ICEstimator software (http://www.antimalarial-icestimator.net).

Piperaquine tetraphosphate was provided by WWARN and prepared in 0.5% lactic acid. The piperaquine survival assay was performed according to Witkowski et al.3 Briefly, P. falciparum parasites at the ring stage, 0–3 h post-invasion, were obtained by centrifugation in 75% Percoll and their concentration adjusted to between 0.5% and 1% of parasitaemia. Parasites were incubated with 200 nM piperaquine or 0.5% lactic acid (drug-free control). The drug was washed off after 48 h of exposure. Parasitaemia was measured in 10 000 RBCs under a microscope, after 72 h of culture. For each P. falciparum strain tested, the survival rate was determined as the ratio between the parasitaemia in the drug-exposed condition and in the drug-free control condition. The in vitro susceptibility of P. falciparum strains to artemisinin was assessed using the ring-stage survival assay (RSA) as previously described.11

Piperaquine and mefloquine co-susceptibility in vitro assay

P. falciparum parasites at the ring stage, 0–3 h post-invasion, were obtained by centrifugation in 75% Percoll followed by incubation with 5% D-sorbitol and adjusted to between 0.5% and 1% of parasitaemia. Parasites were incubated with seven increasing doses of a piperaquine + mefloquine mixture (from 12.5 to 800 nM for each drug) for 48 h. After washes to eliminate the drugs, parasites were maintained in culture for 24 h. After a total of 72 h in culture, blood smears were prepared, and P. falciparum survival was determined as the ratio between the proportion of viable parasites in the drug-exposed condition and in the drug-free control.

Ethics

All P. falciparum isolates were collected during therapeutic efficacy studies performed in accordance with the Cambodian National Ethical Committee for Human Research (identifier: NECHR #086, NECHR #087, NECHR #092 and NECHR #106).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed with the GraphPad Prism 7.0 software. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare medians. The IC50 values of the piperaquine + mefloquine combination were determined for each strain and compared using the non-linear regression analysis tool in GraphPad 7.0 and the ICEstimator software.

Results

Prevalence of triple-mutant P. falciparum parasites

Molecular analysis of 846 P. falciparum field isolates collected at eight centres in Cambodia between 2016 and 2019 (Figure 1, Table 1) detected pfmdr1 amplification in 45/846 isolates, of which only 1 presented pfpm2 amplification. Pfcrt sequencing (codons 93, 97, 145, 343 and 353) was possible in 39 of the 45 isolates with pfmdr1 amplification. Finally, four isolates (0.47% of 846) harboured markers of resistance to artemisinin, to piperaquine (Pfcrt polymorphism and/or Pfpm2 amplification) and mefloquine. Specifically, these four samples harboured the K13 C580Y (n = 2/4) or Y493H (n = 2/4) mutation, the CRT H97Y mutation and pfmdr1 amplification. Only one sample presented pfpm2 co-amplification in addition to the other markers, resulting in a quadruple-mutant profile. These four triple- and quadruple-mutant isolates were all collected at Kampong Speu (Western Cambodia) in 2018 (n = 3) and 2019 (n = 1). The prevalence of piperaquine and mefloquine co-resistance profiles at this site was 1.34% (n = 3/223) in 2018 and 0.90% (n = 1/111) in 2019 (Table 1). This lower prevalence in 2019 was not statistically significant (P = 0.72, chi-squared).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Prevalence and geographical location of triple-resistant isolates in Cambodia during the 2016–19 period. Pfk13 polymorphisms and co-amplification of pfpm2 and pfmdr1 genes were assessed in 846 P. falciparum isolates collected in Cambodia during therapeutic efficacy studies between 2016 and 2019. Pfcrt polymorphisms in codons 93, 97, 145, 343 and 353 were assessed in 39/45 isolates presenting pfmdr1 amplification. The prevalence of triple mutants and the year of collection are indicated. The red star indicates the province where triple mutants were collected during this study. The blue star indicates the province where three pfk13/pfpm2/pfmdr1 triple-mutant P. falciparum isolates were collected in 2012.7 The resistance phenotype of these isolates was determined in the present study. This figure appears in colour in the online version of JAC and in black and white in the print version of JAC.

Table 1.

Prevalence of triple-resistant P. falciparum isolates collected in Cambodia between 2016 and 2019

Sites 2016
% (n/N)
2017
% (n/N)
2018
% (n/N)
2019
% (n/N)
Total
% (n/N)
Kampong Speu 0 (0/44) 0 (0/55) 4.9 (3/61) 2.9 (1/34) 2.1 (4/194)
Pursat 0 (0/29) 0 (0/50) 0 (0/42) 0 (0/16) 0 (0/137)
Siem Reap 0 (0/3) n/a n/a n/a 0 (0/3)
Kratie 0 (0/18) n/a 0 (0/23) 0 (0/8) 0 (0/49)
Stung Treng 0 (0/43) 0 (0/59) n/a n/a 0 (0/102)
Rattanakiri 0 (0/56) 0 (0/59) 0 (0/53) 0 (0/52) 0 (0/220)
Mondulkri 0 (0/32) 0 (0/60) 0 (0/44) 0 (0/1) 0 (0/137)
Preah Vihear 0 (0/4) n/a n/a n/a 0 (4)
Total 0 (0/229) 0 (0/283) 1.34 (3/223) 0.9 (1/111) 0.47 (4/846)

n/a, not available.

Pf-PM2 and Pf-MDR1 gene and protein expression

mRNA expression of pfpm2 and pfmdr1 was measured in five WT isolates (pfk13-WT, single copy of pfmdr1 and pfpm2) and in seven triple-resistant isolates (the four identified in the present study and three collected in 2012 [Figure 2(a)]. The median relative pfmdr1 expression level was higher in the triple-resistant than in WT P. falciparum [0.77 (IQR: 0.68–1.02) versus 0.38 (IQR: 0.32–0.50); P = 0.0025, Mann–Whitney U-test]. The median pfmdr1 expression levels in the triple-resistant isolates and in three pfmdr1-amplified isolates were not significantly different [0.62 (IQR: 0.57–0.77); P = 0.0714, Mann–Whitney U-test).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(a) Pfmdr1 and pfpm2 expression in triple- and quadruple-mutant P. falciparum isolates. Pfmdr1 and pfpm2 normalized expression levels were quantified in seven triple-mutant isolates (left histogram bar red bar and black dots, light grey diamonds and white triangle according to genotypes), five WT strains (right histogram bar green bar) and three pfk13/pfmdr1 and three pfk13/pfpm2 double-mutants isolates (middle histogram bar pink or orange bar). Each symbol corresponds to the mean value in one isolate (three replicates). Each bar corresponds to the median expression in quadruple, triple or double mutants and WT isolates (compared with the Mann–Whitney U-test). (b) Western blot analysis of Pf-PM2 and Pf-MDR1 expression in three pfk13/pfpm2/pfmdr1 triple mutants and two WT isolates. Pf-PM2 and Pf-MDR1 expression levels were assessed in synchronized P. falciparum trophozoites (24–30 h post-invasion). Pf-aldolase was used as loading control. This figure appears in colour in the online version of JAC and in black and white in the print version of JAC.

The median relative expression of pfpm2 was significantly higher in the co-amplified isolates than in WT P. falciparum isolates [1.42 (IQR: 1.06–1.46) versus 0.59 (IQR: 0.56–0.62); P = 0.0025, Mann–Whitney U-test]. However, the median pfpm2 expression in three pfpm2-amplified isolates [2.5 (IQR: 1.00–2.52); P = 0.0357, Mann–Whitney U-test] was significantly higher than in the co-amplified isolates.

To evaluate the differences in protein expression, Pf-PM2/aldolase and the Pf-MDR1/aldolase ratios were compared in two WT P. falciparum isolates and three pfk13/pfpm2/pfmdr1 co-amplified isolates. Pf-PM2 and Pf-MDR1 showed a trend of overexpression (but not significant) in the co-amplified isolates compared with WT controls (by 2–5.4-fold and 2.8–5.6-fold, respectively), suggesting functional gene amplification [Figure 2(b)].

Phenotypic characterization

Susceptibility to mefloquine was measured in five P. falciparum WT isolates and the six triple mutants and one quadruple mutant with markers of resistance to piperaquine, mefloquine and artemisinin. The median mefloquine IC50 values were 52.36 (IQR: 28.08–54.68) for WT and 84.45 (IQR: 78.16–116.20) for triple-resistant isolates (P = 0.025, Mann–Whitney U-test) [Figure 3(a)].

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Phenotypic characterization of triple- and quadruple-mutant P. falciparum isolates. (a) Five WT (green dots) and six triple mutants in addition to one quadruple mutant with markers of resistance to piperaquine, mefloquine and artemisinin (identified by black dots, diamonds and triangle) collected from 2012 to 2019 were adapted to in vitro culture and their susceptibility to mefloquine, piperaquine and dihydroartemisinin was tested. The red dotted line represents the resistance threshold for each drug. Between-group differences were assessed using the Mann–Whitney U-test. (b) The 3D7 reference clone (green dots, six replicates), a dihydroartemisinin/piperaquineresistant isolate (yellow dots, six replicates), three pfk13/pfcrt/pfmdr1 triple mutant isolates (light grey diamonds, three replicates/each) and the pfk13/pfpm2/pfcrt/pfmdr1 quadruple-mutant isolate (white triangles, six replicates) were exposed at the ring stage 0–3 h post-invasion to eight doses (from 0 to 800 nM) of the piperaquine+mefloquine combination for 48 h. Survival was calculated relative to the drug-free control after 72 h of culture. The (piperaquine+mefloquine) IC50 data were compared with the Mann–Whitney U-test. This figure appears in colour in the online version of JAC and in black and white in the print version of JAC.

Susceptibility to piperaquine showed a median survival rate of 0% (IQR: 0–0) for WT isolates and of 14.59% (IQR: 12.85–19.24) for the triple-resistant isolates (P = 0.0025) [Figure 3(b)]. The median survival rates to dihydroartemisinin (tested with the RSA) were 0% (IQR: 0–0) for the WT isolates and 7.00% (IQR: 1.75–9.03) for the triple-resistant isolates (P = 0.0025, Mann–Whitney U-test).

Susceptibility to the mefloquine + piperaquine combination was measured in the P. falciparum 3D7 reference clone, one dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine-resistant isolate collected in Cambodia, one pfk13/pfpm2/pfcrt/pfmdr1 quadruple mutant and three pfk13/pfcrt/pfmdr1 triple-mutant isolates. The median (piperaquine + mefloquine) IC50 values were 10.59 nM (IQR: 9.80–11.23) for the 3D7 clone, 20.11 nM (IQR: 17.38–30.15) for the dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine-resistant isolate, 42.21 nM (IQR: 35.89–76.24) for the pfk13/pfcrt/pfmdr1 triple mutants and 66.14 nM (IQR: 63.70–81.15) for the pfk13/pfpm2/pfcrt/pfmdr1 quadruple mutant. The IC50 values of the WT 3D7 sensitive clone, the triple and quadruple mutants, and dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine-resistant strains were significantly different (P < 0.01, Mann–Whitney U-test).

Discussion

Our multicentric monitoring showed an overall prevalence of 0.47% of triple-resistant P. falciparum parasites in the first 3 years of artesunate/mefloquine implementation. This prevalence rate is much lower than the 30% detected in Northern Cambodia after less than 12 months following artesunate/mefloquine reintroduction.6 In line with recent literature data, our finding shows that the scenario of triple-resistant P. falciparum surge did not occur in Cambodia.12 Nevertheless, our study and previous reports confirm their circulation in Cambodia and also in other neighbouring countries, such as Vietnam, with a similar low prevalence.13 At this stage, we cannot explain the geographic discrepancies in triple-resistant parasites prevalence within Cambodia. Several factors, such as parasite genetic background, local entomological inoculation rate, immunity, treatment compliance and treatment policy, may contribute to this distribution heterogeneity, but their implication needs to be experimentally demonstrated. In terms of genotype, the main association was between pfmdr1 amplification, pfcrt polymorphisms and artemisinin resistance.

Co-amplification of pfmdr1 and pfpm2, initially observed in Northern Cambodia, was detected only in one strain, and was associated with increased transcription and protein expression, confirming the functional impact of this genotype. This unique strain also harbours pfcrt polymorphisms, thus leading to a quadruple-mutant profile. Several reasons could lead to the low representation of this profile; although complex, the fitness costs associated with resistance to piperaquine and mefloquine is well documented and might participate in the low frequency of a parasite combining these resistances.14,15 In addition, piperaquine, mefloquine and artemisinin derivatives have not been used together at the same time in Cambodia. Thus, whether or not this quadruple-mutant profile would have been selected using this tri-therapy is unknown, our data only demonstrating the viability of this complex multiresistant genotype.

The major added value of this study was the phenotypic characterization of triple- and quadruple-mutant parasites. Our data showed that these parasites are phenotypically resistant to artemisinin, mefloquine and piperaquine in vitro, with susceptibility levels compatible with clinical resistance to artesunate/mefloquine and dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine. Moreover, our results showed that these parasites partially lose their susceptibility to the mefloquine/piperaquine combination in vitro. This indicates that mefloquine/piperaquine-resistant P. falciparum strains may be selected due to the current use of the mefloquine/piperaquine combination, thus questioning the recently proposed triple artemisinin-based combination strategy, in which an artemisinin derivative is combined with mefloquine and piperaquine.

In summary, we observed that P. falciparum parasites resistant to artemisinin, piperaquine and mefloquine circulate at a low rate in Cambodia. The genotypic and phenotypic data showed that P. falciparum can overcome genetic constraints thought to preclude the selection of resistance to both piperaquine and mefloquine. This genetic plasticity suggests that future therapeutic strategies should not only rely on leveraging drug resistance antagonisms to prevent malaria parasite multiresistance.

Supplementary Material

dkac403_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the patients who accepted to participate in the therapeutic efficacy studies and the staff of the Cambodian Health Centres for their contribution. We would like to thank Daniel E. Goldberg (Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MI, USA) for providing the anti-plasmepsin 2 antibodies.

Contributor Information

Mélissa Mairet-Khedim, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR3528, Unité de Microbiologie Structurale, F-75015 Paris, France; Institut Pasteur, Pasteur International Unit, Pasteur International Network, Malaria Translational Research Unit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Paris, France.

Camille Roesch, Institut Pasteur, Pasteur International Unit, Pasteur International Network, Malaria Translational Research Unit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Paris, France; Malaria Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Pasteur Institute of Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Nimol Khim, Institut Pasteur, Pasteur International Unit, Pasteur International Network, Malaria Translational Research Unit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Paris, France; Malaria Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Pasteur Institute of Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Sreynet Srun, Institut Pasteur, Pasteur International Unit, Pasteur International Network, Malaria Translational Research Unit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Paris, France; Malaria Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Pasteur Institute of Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Anthony Bouillon, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR3528, Unité de Microbiologie Structurale, F-75015 Paris, France; Institut Pasteur, Pasteur International Unit, Pasteur International Network, Malaria Translational Research Unit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Paris, France.

Saorin Kim, Institut Pasteur, Pasteur International Unit, Pasteur International Network, Malaria Translational Research Unit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Paris, France; Malaria Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Pasteur Institute of Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Sopheakvatey Ke, Institut Pasteur, Pasteur International Unit, Pasteur International Network, Malaria Translational Research Unit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Paris, France; Malaria Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Pasteur Institute of Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Chhayleang Kauy, Institut Pasteur, Pasteur International Unit, Pasteur International Network, Malaria Translational Research Unit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Paris, France; Malaria Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Pasteur Institute of Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Nimol Kloeung, Institut Pasteur, Pasteur International Unit, Pasteur International Network, Malaria Translational Research Unit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Paris, France; Malaria Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Pasteur Institute of Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Rotha Eam, Institut Pasteur, Pasteur International Unit, Pasteur International Network, Malaria Translational Research Unit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Paris, France; Malaria Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Pasteur Institute of Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Chanra Khean, Institut Pasteur, Pasteur International Unit, Pasteur International Network, Malaria Translational Research Unit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Paris, France; Malaria Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Pasteur Institute of Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Chanvong Kul, Institut Pasteur, Pasteur International Unit, Pasteur International Network, Malaria Translational Research Unit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Paris, France; Malaria Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Pasteur Institute of Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Sophy Chy, Institut Pasteur, Pasteur International Unit, Pasteur International Network, Malaria Translational Research Unit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Paris, France; Malaria Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Pasteur Institute of Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Rithea Leang, National Centre for Malariology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Pascal Ringwald, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Jean-Christophe Barale, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR3528, Unité de Microbiologie Structurale, F-75015 Paris, France; Institut Pasteur, Pasteur International Unit, Pasteur International Network, Malaria Translational Research Unit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Paris, France.

Benoit Witkowski, Institut Pasteur, Pasteur International Unit, Pasteur International Network, Malaria Translational Research Unit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Paris, France; Malaria Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Pasteur Institute of Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Funding

This study was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Global Fund/UNOPS through WHO and by the Institut Pasteur Department of International Affairs. M.M.K. was supported by the 5% initiative (MIVS-ACT, grant #15SANIN211).

Transparency declarations

P.R. is a staff member of the World Health Organization. The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this publication that do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy or views of the World Health Organization. There are no other conflicts of interest to report. None of the authors declared financial conflict of interest.

Author contributions

Data acquisition: M.M.K., C.R., S.S., A.B., N.K., S.K., C.K., N.K., R.E., C.K., C.K., S.C. Data analyses: M.M.K., C.R., N.K., R.L., P.R., J.C.B., B.W. Sampling and data management: S.K. Study design: J.C.B., B.W. Funding acquisition: J.C.B., B.W. Manuscript redaction: M.M.K., C.R., P.R., J.C.B. and B.W.

Supplementary data

Table S1 is available as Supplementary data at JAC Online.

References

  • 1. WHO . Report on antimalarial drug efficacy, resistance and response: 10 years of surveillance (2010–2019). 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/336692. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ariey F, Witkowski B, Amaratunga Cet al. A molecular marker of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature 2014; 505: 50–5. 10.1038/nature12876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Witkowski B, Duru V, Khim Net al. A surrogate marker of piperaquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a phenotype–genotype association study. Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17: 174–83. 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30415-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ross LS, Dhingra SK, Mok Set al. Emerging Southeast Asian PfCRT mutations confer Plasmodium falciparum resistance to the first-line antimalarial piperaquine. Nat Commun 2018; 9: 3314. 10.1038/s41467-018-05652-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Dhingra SK, Gabryszewski SJ, Small-Saunders JLet al. Global spread of mutant PfCRT and its pleiotropic impact on Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance and fitness. mBio 2019; 10: e02731-18. 10.1128/mBio.02731-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Rossi G, De Smet M, Khim Net al. Emergence of Plasmodium falciparum triple mutant in Cambodia. Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17: 1233. 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30635-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Duru V, Khim N, Leang Ret al. Plasmodium falciparum dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine failures in Cambodia are associated with mutant K13 parasites presenting high survival rates in novel piperaquine in vitro assays: retrospective and prospective investigations. BMC Med 2015; 13: 305. 10.1186/s12916-015-0539-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bouillon A, Giganti D, Benedet Cet al. In silico screening on the three-dimensional model of the Plasmodium vivax SUB1 protease leads to the validation of a novel anti-parasite compound. J Biol Chem 2013; 288: 18561–73. 10.1074/jbc.M113.456764 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Francis SE, Sullivan DJ Jr, Goldberg DE. Hemoglobin metabolism in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Annu Rev Microbiol 1997; 51: 97–123. 10.1146/annurev.micro.51.1.97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Desjardins RE, Canfield CJ, Haynes JDet al. Quantitative assessment of antimalarial activity in vitro by a semiautomated microdilution technique. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1979; 16: 710–8. 10.1128/AAC.16.6.710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Khim Net al. Novel phenotypic assays for the detection of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cambodia: in-vitro and ex-vivo drug-response studies. Lancet Infect Dis 2013; 13: 1043–9. 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70252-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Imwong M, Dhorda M, Myo Tun Ket al. Molecular epidemiology of resistance to antimalarial drugs in the greater Mekong subregion: an observational study. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20: 1470–80. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30228-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Rovira-Vallbona E, Van Hong N, Kattenberg JHet al. Efficacy of dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine and artesunate monotherapy for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in central Vietnam. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75: 2272–81. 10.1093/jac/dkaa172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wicht KJ, Small-Saunders JL, Hagenah LMet al. Mutant PfCRT can mediate piperaquine resistance in African Plasmodium falciparum with reduced fitness and increased susceptibility to other antimalarials. J Infect Dis 2020; 226: 2021–9. 10.1093/infdis/jiac365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Preechapornkul P, Imwong M, Chotivanich Ket al. Plasmodium falciparum pfmdr1 amplification, mefloquine resistance, and parasite fitness. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 1509–15. 10.1128/AAC.00241-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

dkac403_Supplementary_Data

Articles from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES