Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Nov 13;35(2):e14493. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14493

Psychiatric Comorbidities Among Adult Patients with Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction: Prevalence and Relationships to Treatment Outcomes

Elizabeth N Madva a,b,c, Kyle Staller a,c, Jeff C Huffman a,b, Braden Kuo a,c, Isabelle Garcia-Fischer c, Micaela Atkins a,c, Laurie Keefer d, Christopher M Celano a,b,*, Helen Burton Murray a,b,c,*
PMCID: PMC9892339  NIHMSID: NIHMS1847393  PMID: 36371707

Abstract

Background:

Little is known about the impact of psychiatric comorbidity on pharmacologic treatment outcomes, including neuromodulators (medications targeting the gut-brain axis), among adult patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). Accordingly, we aimed to examine associations between psychiatric comorbidity and DGBI pharmacologic treatment outcomes.

Methods:

In a retrospective study of consecutively referred new patients (N=410; ages 18–90; 73% female) to a tertiary neurogastroenterology clinic in 2016 with follow-up through 2018, relationships between psychiatric illness (any psychiatric illness, anxiety disorders, depressive disorders) and pharmacologic treatment selection (any medication, neuromodulating medication) and treatment outcomes, respectively, were examined using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for demographics, gastrointestinal (GI) diagnoses, and pre-existing neuromodulator use.

Key Results:

Anxiety disorders (35%) were the most common psychiatric comorbidity, followed by depressive disorders (29%). Patients with anxiety disorders were more likely to be prescribed a neuromodulator by their gastroenterologist (OR=1.72 [95% CI 1.10–2.75]) yet less likely to respond to neuromodulators (OR=0.43 [0.21–0.90]) or any GI medication (OR=0.24 [0.12–0.50]) in fully adjusted analyses. In contrast, depressive disorders were not associated with neuromodulator prescription or response.

Conclusions and Inferences:

Anxiety disorders are common among patients with DGBI and significantly reduce the likelihood of GI pharmacologic treatment response to any medication prescribed, including neuromodulators.

Keywords: Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Gastrointestinal motility, Psychosomatic Medicine, Pharmacology, Neuromodulators

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1847393-f0001.jpg

Patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) and comorbid anxiety disorders are less likely to respond to any medication, including neuromodulators, prescribed for their gastrointestinal symptoms.

Introduction

Disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI; also known as functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders) are a vast clinical group, increasingly understood to lie along a spectrum of sensory and motility disturbance.1 Of the thirty-three DGBI defined in adults by the ROME IV criteria,2 irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common (global prevalence of approximately 11% in adults)3 and most widely studied.2 The DGBI are thought to be mediated by any combination of the following mechanisms: motility disturbance, visceral hypersensitivity, altered mucosal and immune function, altered gut microbiota, and altered central nervous system processing.2 Conceptualized as resulting from complex interactions between biological, psychological, and social factors,4 DGBI are associated with high rates of comorbid psychiatric illness.4,5

Estimates of psychiatric comorbidity have varied significantly across the spectrum of DGBI.5 Anxiety disorders are the most common psychiatric comorbidity;4 in IBS, prevalence estimates range from approximately 30–50%.4,5 Rates of depressive disorders across the DGBI tend to be lower, ranging from 25–30%.4,5 Some of this variability may be related to treatment setting, with higher rates of psychiatric comorbidity often observed in tertiary as opposed to primary care or community settings.4,6 Across the spectrum of DGBI, there is evidence that psychiatric comorbidity – or at least the presence of psychiatric symptoms – perpetuates and potentiates GI symptoms, heightens visceral hypersensitivity, and worsens quality of life.57

The treatment approach for DGBI is multifaceted and focused on symptom reduction rather than cure.2 For mild or infrequent symptoms, lifestyle modification (e.g., diet and exercise), reassurance, and education about the disorder can at times be sufficient.2 For moderate to severe symptoms, a combination of pharmacotherapy and behavioral health interventions is often required.2 Pharmacotherapy for DGBI includes the use of medications directed at specific GI symptoms, gut motility, and in some cases, the gut-brain axis (i.e., neuromodulators).8,9 Neuromodulators, such as antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antiepileptics, exert their effects on the gut-brain axis by acting on the same serotonergic, noradrenergic, and dopaminergic neurotransmitters and receptors as in the central nervous system.8 Meta-analyses have examined the efficacy of neuromodulators in IBS, with a recent analysis finding a collective number needed to treat of 4.5 for antidepressants.10 Preliminary studies of efficacy in other DGBI are limited, but support the use of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) for pain predominant conditions, and evidence is emerging for the use of other agents.8 It remains to be elucidated, however, if and how comorbid psychiatric disease might impact GI pharmacologic treatment response.

Accordingly, among adult patients with DGBI presenting to a tertiary care neurogastroenterology clinic, we aimed to examine associations between psychiatric illness and GI pharmacologic response, both across all medications prescribed for GI symptoms and for neuromodulators, specifically.

Materials and Methods

Procedure

Participants included consecutively referred adult patients (N=410; aged 18–90 years; 73% female) who presented for initial neurogastroenterology evaluation to a tertiary care academic medical center from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016.11 Electronic medical records from the initial 2016 visit, as well as all subsequent hospital and clinic visits (including mental health visits) through May 31, 2018, were reviewed by four independent coders (H.B.M, C.J.S., A.P.B., A.C.K., see Acknowledgements). Demographic data, presenting complaints, GI diagnoses, comorbid diagnoses, all medications targeting GI symptoms (e.g., prokinetic agents, antidiarrheal agents, neuromodulators) introduced during the study time frame, and medication response were recorded.12 Presenting complaints and GI diagnoses were categorized for analysis purposes (see Supplementary Table 1), as were GI medications and psychiatric diagnoses (grouped per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)).13 A board-certified psychiatrist (E.N.M.) independently and blindly reviewed each chart for psychiatric diagnoses (defined as being noted in at least one patient encounter or in the patient problem list during the study time frame), medications targeting GI symptoms that were prescribed during the study time frame (note: neuromodulators were defined as medications acting on the brain-gut axis including antidepressants, antipsychotics, antiepileptics, and buspirone), report of specific medication side effects (yes/no), and medication benefit (yes/no/insufficient data) as described in the medical record. Interrater reliability was strong (κ=.85) for medication response and moderate (κ=.73) for psychiatric diagnosis. An independent blinded board-certified psychiatrist (C.M.C.) reviewed all disagreements, which were subsequently resolved by consensus. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained prior to study procedure commencement.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to record psychiatric comorbidities. For descriptive purposes, demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between groups (by psychiatric comorbidity presence) with Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests and chi-square tests for continuous and categorical data, respectively. Exploratory multivariable logistic regression analyses examined relationships between psychiatric illness (any psychiatric illness, anxiety disorders, depressive disorders) and treatment selection (prescribed any medication for GI symptoms, prescribed a neuromodulator) and treatment outcomes (response to any GI medication, response to neuromodulator, side effects), respectively. Covariates were selected a priori based on potential links to treatment selection/response and included demographic characteristics (race/ethnicity, age, sex), GI diagnostic category, and pre-existing neuromodulator use. Covariates were entered into the model in a stepwise fashion (model 1=demographics; model 2=demographics + GI diagnosis; model 3=demographics + GI diagnosis + neuromodulator use at the time of initial consultation). Significance was set at p<.05 given the exploratory nature of the analyses. Analyses were performed using Stata version 15.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).

Results

Frequency and Characteristics of Psychiatric Comorbidities Among Patients with DGBI

Of the 410 patient charts reviewed, comorbid psychiatric illness was identified in 226 cases (55%). Characteristics of patients with and without psychiatric comorbidity are summarized in Table 1. Descriptive analyses showed that patients with psychiatric comorbidity were more likely to be female (79% vs 65%, p=.002), diagnosed with an upper (38% vs 27%, p=.014) or lower (61% vs 41%, p<.001) GI disorder, taking a neuromodulator at the time of their initial GI visit (54% vs 16%, p<.001), and referred to psychiatry by their GI provider (16% vs 0%, p<.001) than patients without psychiatric comorbidity. There were no significant differences in age, race/ethnicity, body mass index, presenting symptomatology, prescription of any medication following the GI visit, or clinic follow-up.

Table 1.

Characteristics of DGBI patients with and without psychiatric comorbidity (N=410)

Total Psychiatric Comorbidity
(n = 226)
No Psychiatric Comorbidity
(n = 184)
Test Statistic p-value
Demographics and psychosocial characteristics; n (%)
Age at consult, years; median (interquartile range) 48.0 (31.0 to 61.0) 48.0 (30.0 to 60.0) 49.0 (32.5 to 62.5) z=1.18 .24
Female 298 (72.7) 178 (78.8) 120 (65.2) x2=9.37 .002
White non-Hispanic/Latinoa 341 (84.8) 192 (86.5) 149 (82.8) x2=1.06 .30
Raceb x2=2.25 .52
 American Indian or Alaska Native 1 (0.2) 1 (0.5) 0 (0.0) - -
 Asian 19 (4.7) 8 (3.7) 11 (6.2) - -
 Black or African American 17 (4.2) 9 (4.1) 8 (4.5) - -
 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander - - - - -
 White 350 (87.1) 196 (89.9) 154 (87.0) - -
Ethnicity—Hispanic/Latinoc 22 (5.5) 11 (5.0) 11 (6.2) x2=0.27 .61
Medical Characteristics; n (%)
Body Mass Index- kg/m2; median (interquartile range) 24.8 (21.6 to 28.6) 24.5 (21.4 to 28.5) 25.3 (22.4 to 28.7) z=1.28 .20
Presenting symptoms
 Eating/weight-related 58 (14.1) 36 (15.9) 22 (12.0) x2=1.32 .25
 Esophageal 201 (49.0) 107 (47.3) 94 (51.1) x2=0.57 .45
 Stomach 187 (45.6) 107 (47.3) 80 (43.5) x2=0.61 .43
 Lower 253 (61.7) 149 (65.9) 104 (56.5) x2=3.80 .051
Pre-existing neuromodulator use at time of initial GI visit 152 (37.1) 122 (54.0) 30 (16.3)d x2=61.72 <.001
Following GI Consultation; n (%)
Grouped GI diagnostic categories
 Esophageal sensory-related diagnoses 69 (16.8) 31 (13.7) 38 (20.7) x2=3.49 .062
 Esophageal reflux-related diagnoses 108 (26.3) 59 (26.1) 49 (26.6) x2=0.01 .91
 Upper GI diagnoses 135 (32.7) 86 (38.1) 49 (26.6) x2=5.99 .014
 Lower GI diagnoses 214 (52.2) 138 (61.1) 76 (41.3) x2=15.87 <.001
 Chronic abdominal pain 34 (8.3) 23 (10.2) 11 (6.0) x2=2.35 .13
Prescribed any medication following consult 320 (78.0) 181 (80.1) 139 (75.5) x2=1.22 .27
Prescribed neuromodulator following consult 214 (52.2) 133 (58.8) 81 (44.0) x2=8.94 .003
Follow-up visit (yes/no) 290 (70.7) 166 (73.5) 124 (67.4) x2=1.80 .18
Referred to psychiatry 37 (9.0) 37 (16.4) 0 (0.0) n/a <.001

Note: DGBI = disorder of gut-brain interaction. GI=gastrointestinal. Eating/weight-related presenting symptoms include: low weight, weight loss, poor appetite, food aversion. Esophageal presenting symptoms include: reflux, regurgitation, belching, globus, choking, cough, dysphagia, heartburn, chest pain/pressure, other throat-related symptoms. Stomach presenting symptoms include: nausea, vomiting, postprandial fullness, early satiety, epigastric pain, upper abdominal pain. Lower presenting symptoms include: lower abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation, bloating/distension, fecal incontinence, rectal urgency, rectal pain, anal itching, flatulence. Esophageal sensory-related diagnoses include: globus, dysphagia, non-cardiac chest pain. Esophageal reflux-related diagnoses include: GERD, rumination, chronic belching. Upper GI disorders include: gastroparesis, functional dyspepsia, cyclic vomiting syndrome, chronic unspecified nausea and vomiting. Lower GI disorders include: IBS, chronic constipation, functional diarrhea, abdominal bloating/distension.

a

n=402. Race and ethnicity data missing for n=8.

b

n=387. Race data missing for n=23.

c

n=405. Ethnicity data missing for n=5.

d

Neuromodulators were prescribed for indications other than psychiatric diagnosis.

Of the psychiatric comorbidities identified based on chart review (Table 2), anxiety disorders were the most common (35%), followed by depressive disorders (29%), post-traumatic stress disorder (4%), and eating disorders (4%).

Table 2.

Frequency of chart psychiatric diagnoses among DGBI patients (N=410)

Chart Psychiatric Diagnosisa n (%)
Any psychiatric diagnosis 226 (55.1)
Anxiety disorder 145 (35.4)
Depressive disorder 118 (28.7)
Post-traumatic stress disorder 18 (4.4)
Eating disorderb 18 (4.4)
Bipolar disorder (I or II) 14 (3.4)
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder 12 (2.9)
Adjustment disorder 10 (2.4)
Autism spectrum disorder 9 (2.2)
Substance use disorder 9 (2.2)
Obsessive compulsive disorder 5 (1.2)
Somatic symptom disorder 5 (1.2)
Otherc 4 (1.0)

Note: DGBI = disorder of gut-brain interaction.

a

Psychiatric diagnoses were grouped per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).13

b

Eating disorder diagnoses were identified based on chart review and do not include Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID). ARFID diagnoses have been examined separately using DSM-5 criteria applied to clinical information extracted from the medical record.12

c

Other includes psychotic disorders, personality disorders, and major neurocognitive disorder with behavioral disturbance, grouped to prevent potential patient identification.

Relationships between Psychiatric Comorbidities and Treatment Selection

Prescribed any medication.

On multivariable logistic regression, no significant relationships were identified between likelihood of being prescribed any medication for GI symptoms following the initial GI visit and any psychiatric diagnosis, anxiety disorders, or depressive disorders, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3.

Multivariable associations between psychiatric illness and treatment outcomes (N=410)

Predictor Model OR (95% CI) SE p-value
Prescribed any GI medication
Any psychiatric diagnosis 1 1.27 (0.78–2.10) .31 .33
2 1.01 (0.61–1.68) .26 .97
3 0.83 (0.48–1.44) .23 .51
Anxiety disorder 1 1.27 (0.75–2.14) .34 .37
2 1.06 (0.61–1.82) .29 .84
3 0.94 (0.53–1.64) .27 .82
Depressive disorder 1 1.32 (0.76–2.29) .37 .33
2 1.08 (0.61–1.92) .32 .79
3 0.90 (0.49–1.65) .28 .72
Prescribed any neuromodulator
Any psychiatric diagnosis 1 1.68 (1.12–2.54) .35 .013*
2 1.38 (0.89–2.14) .31 .15
3 1.19 (0.75–1.89) .28 .46
Anxiety disorder 1 2.01 (1.30–3.11) .45 .002**
2 1.88(1.19–2.96) .44 .007**
3 1.72 (1.10–2.75) .41 .023*
Depressive disorder 1 1.92 (1.21–3.05) .45 .005**
2 1.63 (1.01–2.64) .40 .045*
3 1.42 (0.86–2.36) .37 .18
Response to any GI medication
Any psychiatric diagnosis 1 0.27 (0.13–0.58) .11 .001**
2 0.29 (0.14–0.64) .12 .002**
3 0.24 (0.11–0.56) .10 .001**
Anxiety disorder 1 0.27 (0.14–0.53) .92 <.001**
2 0.28 (0.14–0.55) .97 <.001**
3 0.24 (0.12–0.50) .89 <.001**
Depressive disorder 1 0.61 (0.31–1.17) .20 .14
2 0.70 (0.35–1.40) .25 .32
3 0.66 (0.32–1.38) .25 .27
Response to any neuromodulator
Any psychiatric diagnosis 1 0.49 (0.24–1.01) .18 .055
2 0.53 (0.25–1.11) .20 .092
3 0.51 (0.24–1.10) .20 .087
Anxiety disorder 1 0.44 (0.22–0.88) .15 .019*
2 0.45 (0.22–0.91) .16 .027*
3 0.43 (0.21–0.90) .16 .025*
Depressive disorder 1 0.76 (0.38–1.54) .27 .45
2 0.91 (0.43–1.93) .35 .81
3 0.92 (0.42–2.00) .36 .83
Reported side effects
Any psychiatric diagnosis 1 1.49 (0.89–2.51) .40 .13
2 1.31 (0.76–2.24) .36 .33
3 1.57 (0.89–2.80) .46 .12
Anxiety disorder 1 1.41 (0.84–2.36) .37 .19
2 1.33 (0.79–2.26) .36 .29
3 1.52 (0.88–2.64) .43 .14
Depressive disorder 1 0.95 (0.55–1.63) .26 .84
2 0.80 (0.45–1.42) .23 .45
3 0.92 (0.50–1.70) .29 .80

Note: GI=gastrointestinal.

Model 1: Adjusting for demographic characteristics (race/ethnicity, age, sex).

Model 2: Adjusting for model 1 predictors/covariates plus five grouped GI diagnostic categories including esophageal sensory-related diagnoses (globus, dysphagia, non-cardiac chest pain), esophageal reflux-related diagnoses (gastroesophageal reflux disease, rumination, chronic belching), upper GI disorders (gastroparesis, functional dyspepsia, cyclic vomiting syndrome, chronic unspecified nausea and vomiting), lower GI disorders (irritable bowel syndrome, chronic constipation, functional diarrhea, abdominal bloating/distension) and chronic abdominal pain, and pre-existing neuromodulator use.

Model 3: Adjusting for model 2 predictors/covariates plus pre-existing neuromodulator prescription.

**

p<.01

*

p<.05

p<.1

Prescribed a neuromodulator.

Univariate analyses showed that patients with psychiatric comorbidity were more likely to be prescribed a neuromodulator following their GI visit (59% vs 44%, p=.003; see Table 1). Multivariable analysis showed that patients with any psychiatric diagnosis (OR 1.68 [1.12–2.54], p=.013), anxiety disorders (OR 2.01 [1.30–3.11], p=.002), and depressive disorders (OR 1.92 [1.21–3.05], p=.005) were all more likely to be prescribed a neuromodulator when adjusting for demographic characteristics only (race/ethnicity, age, sex). However, in fully adjusted analyses, accounting for demographic characteristics, GI diagnoses, and pre-existing neuromodulator prescription, only anxiety disorders were significantly associated with new neuromodulator prescription (OR 1.72 [1.10–2.75], p=.023).

Relationships between Psychiatric Comorbidities and Treatment Outcomes

Response to any medication.

Multivariable logistic regression showed that patients with any psychiatric diagnosis (OR 0.24 [0.11–0.56], p=.001) were significantly less likely to respond to any medication, even when accounting for demographic characteristics, GI diagnoses, and pre-existing neuromodulator prescription. Lower likelihood of treatment response was also seen for anxiety disorders (OR 0.24 [0.12–0.50], p<.001) specifically, but not depressive disorders.

Response to any neuromodulator.

Patients with any psychiatric diagnosis trended toward being less likely to respond to any neuromodulator, though this was not statistically significant (OR 0.51 [0.24–1.10], p=.087). In fully adjusted analyses, lower likelihood of neuromodulator response was seen for anxiety disorders (OR 0.43 [0.21–0.90], p=.025), but not depressive disorders.

Reported side effects.

There were no significant relationships between report of side effects and any psychiatric diagnosis, anxiety disorders, or depressive disorders, respectively.

Discussion

Despite high rates of psychiatric comorbidity across the DGBI spectrum,5 the impact of psychiatric illness on GI pharmacologic treatment response has not previously been described. We sought to evaluate the pharmacologic impact of psychiatric illness among adult patients presenting for neurogastroenterology evaluation. Comorbid psychiatric illness was identified in over half (55%) of all patients, with anxiety disorders being the most common (35%). Patients with comorbid anxiety disorders were more likely to be prescribed a neuromodulator, yet less likely to respond to either neuromodulators or any medication prescribed for their GI symptoms during the nearly 2.5-year study time frame. In contrast, no significant relationships were found between depressive disorders and pharmacologic treatment selection or response when adjusting for demographic characteristics, GI diagnoses, and pre-existing neuromodulator prescription. To our knowledge, this represents one of the first examinations of the impact of comorbid psychiatric illness on GI pharmacologic treatment response among adult patients with DGBI.

Our finding that anxiety disorders were the most common (35%) comorbid psychiatric diagnosis across the DGBI spectrum extends the existing literature.5,14 Anxiety disorders are the most common psychiatric comorbidity in IBS, with rates of approximately 30–50% across treatment settings.4,5 We identified similarly high rates in our study’s broad population including disorders across the DGBI spectrum.5 Interestingly, despite the high rates of psychiatric comorbidity in this population, relatively few referrals were made to outpatient psychiatry (see Table 1), which may reflect involvement of existing mental health treaters, lack of perceived need, long wait times, or other barriers to referral that should be identified in future investigations.

That comorbid anxiety disorders – but not depressive disorders – were associated with worse GI pharmacologic treatment response in our analyses may be reflective of the unique mechanistic role of anxiety in DGBI. It has long been postulated that vulnerability to anxiety disorders and DGBI may share similar pathways,4 and a recent genome-wide analysis identified shared genetic susceptibilities.15 Comorbid anxiety disorders, over all other psychiatric disorders, are associated with the greatest GI symptom burden among DGBI patients,16 and may potentiate GI-specific anxiety, a key mediator of behavioral treatment outcomes in DGBI such as IBS.17 Though both depression and anxiety have been shown to contribute to heightened visceral hypersensitivity in IBS,7 only comorbid anxiety disorders have been associated with impaired gastric accommodation,18 increased gastric sensitivity,19 and modulation of visceral afferent input20 in functional dyspepsia, for example. Though one might have imagined that patients with comorbid anxiety disorders would respond more robustly to neuromodulation (if the neuromodulating agent has both GI and psychiatric efficacy), our findings suggest otherwise, and highlight the likely complex relationship between anxiety and GI function, which current medications may not adequately target.

Study limitations include the retrospective design and use of chart history to identify comorbid psychiatric diagnoses and treatment response. Assessment for psychiatric comorbidity, however, is part of standard neurogastroenterology care in our center and two blinded psychiatrists independently coded psychiatric diagnoses. Additionally, even in this tertiary care population that may have potentially been enriched for psychiatric comorbidity, the prevalence of comorbid psychiatric disorders was consistent with prior research (particularly when considering the entirety of the DGBI spectrum).5 Some treatment response granularity may have been lost with our binary pharmacologic treatment response outcome (i.e., any improvement was defined as improvement), but this was necessary for accuracy, as degree of improvement was not consistently described in the medical record. Lastly, there may be other factors associated with pharmacologic treatment response (e.g., duration or severity of GI or psychiatric symptoms, neuromodulator dose, presence of comorbid pain disorders, participation in other therapies) that were not captured in this retrospective study, and which should be explored in future investigations.

Our findings enhance our understanding of the relationship between psychiatric illness and the DGBI spectrum, providing novel information about GI pharmacologic treatment selection and response. As the presence of comorbid anxiety disorders appears to reduce GI pharmacologic treatment response, screening for psychiatric illness, particularly for anxiety disorders, may be key. It may be that targeted treatment of comorbid anxiety disorders through increased referral to mental health professionals and/or the use of integrative, team-based approaches incorporating GI psychologists/psychiatrists and non-pharmacologic treatment modalities (e.g., cognitive-behavioral therapy) could have the potential to lead to better GI outcomes. Further research is needed to clarify the mechanism underlying the relationship between comorbid anxiety disorders and GI pharmacologic treatment response, and to determine which approaches may be most effective at improving GI outcomes in the face of comorbid anxiety.

Supplementary Material

SUPINFO

Key Points.

  1. Anxiety disorders were the most common (35%) psychiatric comorbidity in a sample of adult patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction, consistent with prior research.

  2. The presence of anxiety disorders significantly reduced the likelihood of gastrointestinal pharmacologic treatment response to any medication prescribed for gastrointestinal symptoms, including neuromodulators, in patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction.

  3. Gastrointestinal pharmacologic treatment response in patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction may benefit from early identification and targeted treatment of comorbid psychiatric illness, particularly anxiety disorders. Further research is needed to inform these recommendations.

Acknowledgments:

The authors thank Abbey P. Bailey, Ani C. Keshishian, and Casey J. Silvernale for their assistance with coding the original data set.

Funding:

Time for analysis and article preparation was funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, K23 DK120945 (KS), K23 DK131334 (HBM), R01DK121003 (BK), and U01DK112193 (BK), and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, R01HL155301 (CMC) and R01HL133149 (JCH), and the Harvard Medical School Dupont Warren Research Fellowship (ENM). The study sponsors had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data or writing of the report.

Competing interests:

The authors have no competing interests related to this research. KS has received research support from Ironwood and Urovant and has served as a consultant to Arena, Gelesis, GI Supply, and Shire/Takeda. HBM receives royalties from Oxford University Press for her forthcoming book on rumination syndrome. CMC has received salary support for research from BioXcel Pharmaceuticals and honoraria for talks to Sunovion Pharmaceuticals on topics unrelated to this research. BK has received research support from Medtronic, Gelesis, Takeda, Vanda, and consulting/speaking arrangements with Arena, CinDom, Cin Rx, Medtronic, Entrega, Ironwood, Neurogastrix, Phathom, Serepta, Sigma Wasserman, and Takeda. LK receives consulting fees from Lilly, Takeda, Pfizer, Abbvie, Reckitt Health and Trellus Health, and is a co-founder/equity owner for Trellus Health. There are no other funding sources to declare.

References

  • 1.Ouyang A, Locke GR 3rd. Overview of neurogastroenterology-gastrointestinal motility and functional GI disorders: classification, prevalence, and epidemiology. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2007;36:485–98, vii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Drossman DA. Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: History, Pathophysiology, Clinical Features and Rome IV. Gastroenterology 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Enck P, Aziz Q, Barbara G, et al. Irritable bowel syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016;2:16014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Van Oudenhove L, Crowell MD, Drossman DA, et al. Biopsychosocial Aspects of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders. Gastroenterology 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Person H, Keefer L. Psychological comorbidity in gastrointestinal diseases: Update on the brain-gut-microbiome axis. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2021;107:110209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wu JC. Psychological Co-morbidity in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Epidemiology, Mechanisms and Management. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012;18:13–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Elsenbruch S, Rosenberger C, Enck P, Forsting M, Schedlowski M, Gizewski ER. Affective disturbances modulate the neural processing of visceral pain stimuli in irritable bowel syndrome: an fMRI study. Gut 2010;59:489–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Drossman DA, Tack J, Ford AC, Szigethy E, Tornblom H, Van Oudenhove L. Neuromodulators for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction): A Rome Foundation Working Team Report. Gastroenterology 2018;154:1140–71 e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Camilleri M, Bueno L, Andresen V, De Ponti F, Choi MG, Lembo A. Pharmacological, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacogenomic Aspects of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders. Gastroenterology 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ford AC, Lacy BE, Harris LA, Quigley EMM, Moayyedi P. Effect of Antidepressants and Psychological Therapies in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2019;114:21–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Murray HB, Bailey AP, Keshishian AC, et al. Prevalence and Characteristics of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder in Adult Neurogastroenterology Patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;18:1995–2002 e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Burton Murray H, Jehangir A, Silvernale CJ, Kuo B, Parkman HP. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder symptoms are frequent in patients presenting for symptoms of gastroparesis. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020;32:e13931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Association AP. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Woodhouse S, Hebbard G, Knowles SR. Psychological controversies in gastroparesis: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2017;23:1298–309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Eijsbouts C, Zheng T, Kennedy NA, et al. Genome-wide analysis of 53,400 people with irritable bowel syndrome highlights shared genetic pathways with mood and anxiety disorders. Nat Genet 2021;53:1543–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vu J, Kushnir V, Cassell B, Gyawali CP, Sayuk GS. The impact of psychiatric and extraintestinal comorbidity on quality of life and bowel symptom burden in functional GI disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014;26:1323–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Keefer L, Ballou SK, Drossman DA, Ringstrom G, Elsenbruch S, Ljotsson B. A Rome Working Team Report on Brain-Gut Behavior Therapies for Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction. Gastroenterology 2022;162:300–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ly HG, Weltens N, Tack J, Van Oudenhove L. Acute Anxiety and Anxiety Disorders Are Associated With Impaired Gastric Accommodation in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;13:1584–91 e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Van Oudenhove L, Vandenberghe J, Geeraerts B, et al. Relationship between anxiety and gastric sensorimotor function in functional dyspepsia. Psychosom Med 2007;69:455–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Van Oudenhove L, Vandenberghe J, Dupont P, et al. Abnormal regional brain activity during rest and (anticipated) gastric distension in functional dyspepsia and the role of anxiety: a H(2)(15)O-PET study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:913–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SUPINFO

RESOURCES