Significance
The emergence of biological novelty is often coupled to the evolution of Earth’s chemical environment. Here, we studied how the evolution of a bacterial CO2-concentrating mechanism (CCM)—a complex, multicomponent system that enables modern CO2-fixing bacteria to grow robustly in environments with low CO2—depends on environmental CO2 levels. Using a “synthetic biological” approach to assay the growth of the present-day bacteria engineered to resemble ancient ones, we show that it is possible to explain the emergence of bacterial CCMs if atmospheric CO2 was once much higher than today, consistent with geochemical proxies. Taken together, our results delineated an unexpected “CO2-catalyzed” pathway for the evolution of bacterial CCMs, whose multiple emergence has been challenging to understand.
Keywords: carbon fixation, evolution, photosynthesis, Earth history, synthetic biology
Abstract
Cyanobacteria rely on CO2-concentrating mechanisms (CCMs) to grow in today’s atmosphere (0.04% CO2). These complex physiological adaptations require ≈15 genes to produce two types of protein complexes: inorganic carbon (Ci) transporters and 100+ nm carboxysome compartments that encapsulate rubisco with a carbonic anhydrase (CA) enzyme. Mutations disrupting any of these genes prohibit growth in ambient air. If any plausible ancestral form—i.e., lacking a single gene—cannot grow, how did the CCM evolve? Here, we test the hypothesis that evolution of the bacterial CCM was “catalyzed” by historically high CO2 levels that decreased over geologic time. Using an E. coli reconstitution of a bacterial CCM, we constructed strains lacking one or more CCM components and evaluated their growth across CO2 concentrations. We expected these experiments to demonstrate the importance of the carboxysome. Instead, we found that partial CCMs expressing CA or Ci uptake genes grew better than controls in intermediate CO2 levels (≈1%) and observed similar phenotypes in two autotrophic bacteria, Halothiobacillus neapolitanus and Cupriavidus necator. To understand how CA and Ci uptake improve growth, we model autotrophy as colimited by CO2 and HCO3−, as both are required to produce biomass. Our experiments and model delineated a viable trajectory for CCM evolution where decreasing atmospheric CO2 induces an HCO3− deficiency that is alleviated by acquisition of CA or Ci uptake, thereby enabling the emergence of a modern CCM. This work underscores the importance of considering physiology and environmental context when studying the evolution of biological complexity.
Nearly all carbon enters the biosphere through CO2 fixation in the Calvin–Benson–Bassham (CBB) cycle. Rubisco, the carboxylating enzyme of that pathway, is often considered inefficient due to relatively slow carboxylation kinetics (1–3) and nonspecific oxygenation of its five-carbon substrate ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate, or RuBP (4, 5). However, rubisco arose more than 2.5 billion years ago, when the Earth’s atmosphere contained virtually no O2 and, many argue, far more CO2 than today (6, 7). Over geologic timescales, photosynthetic O2 production (6), organic carbon burial (8), and CO2-consuming silicate weathering reactions (9) caused a gradual increase in atmospheric levels of O2 (≈20% of 1 bar atmosphere today) and depletion of atmospheric CO2 to the present-day levels of a few hundred parts per million (≈280 ppm preindustrial, ≈420 ppm or ≈0.04% today). Historical CO2 levels are challenging to estimate, but are thought to have been substantially higher than today, perhaps as high as 0.1–1 bar early in Earth history (7). It is likely, therefore, that contemporary autotrophs grow on much lower levels of CO2 than their ancestors did.
Many CO2-fixing organisms evolved CO2-concentrating mechanisms (CCMs), which help meet the challenge of fixing carbon in a low CO2 atmosphere. CCMs concentrate CO2 near rubisco and are found in several varieties in all Cyanobacteria, some Proteobacteria, as well as many eukaryotic algae and diverse plants (10). Because CO2 and O2 addition occur at the same active site in rubisco (4), elevated CO2 has the dual effects of accelerating carboxylation and suppressing oxygenation of RuBP by competitive inhibition (10). As shown in Fig. 1A, bacterial CCMs are encoded by ≈15 genes comprising three primary features: Zi) an energy-coupled inorganic carbon (Ci) transporter at the cell membrane and ii) a cytosolic 100+ nm protein compartment called the carboxysome that iii) coencapsulates rubisco with a carbonic anhydrase (CA) enzyme (2, 11). Energized Ci transport produces a high HCO3− concentration in the cytosol (≈30 mM, Fig. 1A), which is converted into a high carboxysomal CO2 concentration by CA activity, localized exclusively to the carboxysome (12, 13). While HCO3- undergoes spontaneous dehydration to CO2, the uncatalyzed reaction is slow enough (≈10s equilibration times) that HCO3- can enter the carboxysome diffusively, where it undergoes rapid CA-catalyzed dehydration (10). This description applies to both varieties of bacterial CCM: the α-carboxysome variety found in Proteobacteria and many Cyanobacteria, as well as the β form found exclusively in Cyanobacteria (11, 14, 15).
CCM genes are straightforward to identify experimentally as mutations disrupting essential CCM components prohibit growth in ambient air (Fig. 1B) and mutants are typically grown in 1% CO2 or more (16–20). At first glance, therefore, the CCM appears to be “irreducibly complex” as all plausible recent ancestors—e.g., strains lacking individual CCM genes—are not viable in the present-day atmosphere. Irreducible complexity is incompatible with evolution by natural selection, so we and others supposed that bacterial CCMs evolved over a protracted interval of Earth history when atmospheric CO2 concentrations were much greater than that today (10, 21–23). We therefore hypothesized that ancestral forms of the bacterial CCM (i.e., those lacking some genes and complexes required today) would have improved organismal growth in the elevated CO2 environments that prevailed when they arose.
To test the hypothesis, we constructed the present-day analogs of plausible CCM ancestors (henceforth “analogs of ancestral CCMs”) and tested their growth across a range of CO2 partial pressures. Note that we have not endeavored to generate precise reconstructions of ancient taxa—indeed, we lack sufficient information about the organisms and their environments to do so. Rather, we aimed to identify the key components that appear in all CCMs (10) and ask whether or not they improve growth on their own in some defined CO2 concentration. Our goal was to identify a stepwise pathway of gene acquisition supporting the evolutionary emergence of a bacterial CCM by improving growth in ever-decreasing CO2 concentrations (Fig. 1C). We focused on trajectories involving sequential acquisition of genetic components because CAs (24), Ci transporters (20), and homologs of carboxysome shell genes (14, 25) are widespread among bacteria and could therefore be acquired horizontally.
One approach to constructing contemporary analogs of CCM ancestors is to remove CCM genes from a native host. If CCM components were acquired sequentially, some single-gene knockouts would be analogous to recent ancestors, e.g., those lacking a complete carboxysome shell (26). We tested this approach by assaying a whole-genome knockout library of a ɣ-proteobacterial chemoautotroph, H. neapolitanus, in five CO2 partial pressures (20, 27). As shown in Fig. 2 and elaborated below, we found that many CCM genes contribute substantially to growth even at CO2 concentrations tenfold greater than the present-day atmosphere (0.5% CO2, ≈12.5 times the present atmospheric levels in 2020, PAL), supporting the view that CCM components play an important physiological role even in relatively high environmental CO2 concentrations.
Removing single CCM genes from a native host can only produce analogs of recent ancestors, however. We recently constructed a functional α-carboxysome CCM in an engineered E. coli strain called CCMB1 (2). This strain depends on rubisco carboxylation for growth and expression of a full complement of CCM genes from the chemoautotroph H. neapolitanus enabled growth in ambient air. Here, we used CCMB1 to construct analogs of ancestral CCMs, including several lacking one or more essential components of modern CCMs. We assayed the growth of these putative ancestors across a range of CO2 pressures to determine whether any ancestral forms contribute to organismal fitness—i.e., improve growth relative to a control strain expressing only rubisco—across a range of CO2 pressures. We had expected these experiments to highlight the central role of the carboxysome compartment (23), but instead found that CAs and/or Ci uptake systems were likely early drivers of CCM evolution. In the following sections, we describe these experiments, discuss how they highlight the central role of bicarbonate (HCO3−) in all metabolisms, and comment on how these results can inform our entwined understandings of bacterial physiology, CCM evolution, and the CO2 content of Earth’s ancient atmosphere.
Results and Discussion
H. neapolitanus CCM Genes Contribute to Fitness Even in Elevated CO2.
Using barcoded genome-wide transposon mutagenesis, we previously demonstrated that a 20-gene cluster in H. neapolitanus contains all the genes necessary for a functional CCM (2, 20). Our original screen measured the effect of gene disruption across the entire genome via batch competition assays, comparing the abundance of disruptive mutants in high CO2 (5%, ≈125 PAL) and ambient air (≈0.04%) via high-throughput sequencing (20, 28). If the relative abundance of mutants in a particular gene decreased reproducibly in ambient air, but not in 5% CO2, we concluded that the gene is linked to autotrophic growth in ambient air and, therefore, likely participates in the CCM. Our mutant “library” includes an average ≈35 distinct mutants per gene, so each “mutant fitness assay” contains multiple internal biological replicates.
To mimic the changes in atmospheric CO2 that likely occurred over Earth history, we assayed the same library in three additional CO2 pressures to cover five CO2 levels: ambient (≈0.04% CO2), low (0.5%, 12.5 PAL), moderate (1.5%, 37.5 PAL), high (5%, 125 PAL), and very high (10%, 250 PAL). Replicate experiments were strongly correlated (R > 0.85, SI Appendix, Fig. S2), implying a high degree of reproducibility. We, therefore, proceeded to ask whether H. neapolitanus CCM genes contribute to growth in a range of CO2 concentrations.
Fig. 2 plots the effect of disrupting CCM genes across five CO2 pressures, with genes grouped by their documented roles in the CCM. Each point in Fig. 2A represents the average fitness of 5–50 individual mutants. Surprisingly, we found that many CCM genes also contributed substantially to growth in 0.5% and 1.5% CO2, as indicated by large growth defects in disruptive mutants (negative values in Fig. 2A), resulting in a negative average impact of CCM mutants when the CO2 pressure was 1.5% or less (Fig. 2B). Carboxysome genes, for example, were critical for growth in 0.5% CO2, while certain Ci transport genes contributed substantially to growth in 0.5% and 1.5% CO2.
In high CO2, however, the H. neapolitanus CCM appears to be entirely dispensable (5–10%, Fig. 2B). As such, the data presented in Fig. 2 indicated that individual CCM components such as the carboxysome, CA, or Ci transporter may improve autotrophic growth in intermediate CO2 levels (≈1%) even in the absence of a complete and functional CCM. We considered testing this hypothesis in H. neapolitanus directly by constructing “ancestral-like” CCMs lacking carboxysome shell genes or Ci transporters. However, genetic manipulation of H. neapolitanus is cumbersome, and the native host’s regulatory network could complicate interpretation—a concern highlighted by three DNA-binding proteins that emerged in our screen as likely regulators of the CCM (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 and Table S1). We, therefore, decided to construct and test analogs of CCM ancestors in a nonnative host, namely E. coli.
Evaluating Putative Ancestral CCMs in a Rubisco-Dependent E. coli.
We recently developed an E. coli strain, CCMB1, that depends on rubisco carboxylation for growth in minimal medium. This strain requires elevated CO2 for rubisco-dependent growth, but expressing the H. neapolitanus CCM from two plasmids enabled growth in ambient air (2). One of these plasmids, pCB’, expresses the carboxysome genes along with the encapsulated rubisco and CA enzymes (2). pCB’ derives from pHnCB10, which we routinely use to purify whole carboxysomes from E. coli (29, 30). The second plasmid, pCCM’, encodes the DAB1 Ci transporter, two rubisco chaperones, and a carboxysome positioning system (2, 20, 31, 32). We previously confirmed that CCM expression from these two plasmids enables growth in ambient air by i) verifying carboxysome formation by purification and electron microscopy, ii) demonstrating that several targeted mutations to CCM components abrogate growth in ambient air, and iii) measuring incorporation of isotopically labeled CO2 into biomass (2). Here, we used this two-plasmid system to express analogs of putative CCM ancestors in CCMB1 and assayed these strains’ growth in ambient air, 0.5%, 1.5%, and 5% CO2. We compared the growth of strains expressing partial CCMs to that of a reference CCMB1 strain expressing the H. neapolitanus Form IA rubisco on a vector, termed p1A, that expresses no other CCM components (2). As indicated by end point culture densities, the reference strain grew robustly in 5% CO2 but failed to grow in ambient air (Fig. 3A, “Rubisco Alone”). Full growth curves are given in Supplementary Information.
Consistent with our previous work, expression of the full complement of CCM genes permitted growth in all CO2 concentrations tested, as evident from the end point optical densities of these cultures (Fig. 3A, “Full CCM”). As the carboxysome is typically presented as the centerpiece of the bacterial CCM, we presumed that rubisco encapsulation played a pivotal role in CCM evolution. Indeed, recent modeling efforts support this hypothesis with calculations suggesting that encapsulation of rubisco in a semipermeable barrier could improve CO2 fixation by generating an acidic local pH (23). To evaluate the effect of encapsulating rubisco in a protein compartment, we replaced the pCCM’ plasmid with a vector control so that no Ci transporter was expressed and further deactivated the carboxysomal CA by mutating a single cysteine residue (pCB’ CsosCA C173S, “Encap. Rub.” in Fig. 3A). This pair of plasmids did not improve growth over the reference strain in any CO2 concentration tested. However, when we left the CA active site intact on otherwise identical plasmids (“En. Rub.+CA”), growth improved substantially in intermediate CO2 levels (0.5% and 1.5%). These data indicated that a carboxysomal CA plays a pivotal role in 0.5% and 1.5% CO2 (23), though it was unclear from these experiments whether carboxysome genes contribute to growth in these conditions.
CA and Energy-Coupled Ci Transport Improve the Growth of Rubisco-Dependent E. coli.
Our observation that expression of the carboxysomal CA improves rubisco-dependent growth on its own (i.e., without also expressing a Ci transporter) motivated us to test the effects of CA and Ci transport independently of carboxysome expression. We designed plasmids that express the H. neapolitanus Dab2 Ci transporter (20), E. coli’s native CA (Can), or both. This was achieved by cloning both Dab2 and Can into a dual expression vector and making targeted active site mutants (DabA C539A, Can C48A, D50A) to isolate each activity. These vectors were cotransformed into CCMB1 with a constitutive version of p1A (p1Ac) so that rubisco expression would not be affected by induction of Dab2 or Can (Methods).
Expressing active Can and Dab2, whether alone or together, improved growth substantially in 1.5% CO2 (compare “+DAB+CA−,” “+DAB−+CA,” and “+DAB+CA” to “Rubisco Alone” in Fig. 4). This effect was even more pronounced in 0.5% CO2, where the reference strain failed to grow (Fig. 4A and SI Appendix, Fig. S7). Similar to the reference strain, a double-negative control strain expressing inactivated versions of both Dab2 and Can (“+Dab−+CA−”) grew poorly or not at all in 0.5% and 1.5% CO2, implying that the observed growth improvements were due to activity and not a side effect of heterologous gene expression.
It was not immediately obvious to us how CA and Ci uptake activities improve rubisco-dependent growth of CCMB1 E. coli. We found the effects of Dab2 expression especially perplexing because Ci uptake is expected to generate intracellular HCO3− (11–13, 20, 33) while the rubisco substrate is CO2 (34). We observed similar phenotypes when expressing the cyanobacterial Na+:HCO3− symporter, sbtA (11, 35), in CCMB1 (SI Appendix, Fig. S8). To confirm that these results are not a side effect of working in an engineered E. coli strain, but rather a genuine feature of autotrophy, we pursued experiments in a natively autotrophic proteobacterium, C. necator.
C. necator Depends on CA for Autotrophic Growth.
While all photosynthetic Cyanobacteria rely on the CBB cycle and a full complement of CCM genes (14), some chemoautotrophic bacteria depend on the CBB cycle but lack identifiable genes encoding carboxysome components or Ci transporters (36, 37). As most characterized bacterial rubiscos are not CO2 saturated in ambient air and are, in addition, substantially inhibited by atmospheric levels of O2 (5), we expected that such organisms would require elevated CO2 for robust growth.
Cupriavidus necator, formerly known as Ralstonia eutropha, is one such bacterium (38, 39). C. necator is a facultative chemolithoautotroph typically found at the interface between oxic and anoxic environments where H2 and O2 coexist. Such “knallgas” environments include soils, sediments, and geothermal sites (40) that are often characterized by elevated CO2 (40, 41). While C. necator is an obligate aerobe capable of chemoautotrophic growth on H2, CO2, and O2 via the CBB cycle, it has no carboxysome genes and no obvious Ci transporters (37). Consistent with previous reports (42), autotrophic growth of wild-type C. necator was very poor in ambient CO2 (“C. necator WT” in Fig. 5A). We generated a double CA knockout strain, C. necator Δcan Δcaa (43, 44), and found that CA removal greatly attenuated autotrophic growth in 0.5% and 1.5% CO2 (“C. necator ΔCA”). Consistent with our experiments in E. coli, this growth defect was complemented by heterologous expression of a human CA (“ΔCA+CA”) or a DAB-type Ci uptake system (“ΔCA+DAB”). Moreover, as in E. coli, coexpression of Ci uptake with native CAs was not deleterious (“WT+DAB”). Rather, this strain grew to higher densities than wild type in 1.5% and 5% CO2 (e.g., Fig. 5B).
A Nutritional Requirement for HCO3- Explains the Observed Phenotypes.
We found that expression of a CA, Ci transporter, or both improved rubisco-dependent growth of C. necator and CCMB1 E. coli in intermediate CO2 concentrations (0.5 and 1.5%, Figs. 4 and 5). Furthermore, to our surprise, a CCMB1 strain expressing active Dab2 and Can grew reproducibly, if slowly, in ambient air (“+Dab+CA” in Fig. 6). This was remarkable because biological membranes are very permeable to CO2, with a permeability coefficient PC ≈ 0.1-1 cm/s (13, 45, 46). Given this high permeability, we expected coexpression of energized HCO3− uptake with a CA to generate a deleterious “futile cycle” where energy-expended pumping HCO3− was wasted when CO2 produced by CA activity “leaks” back out of the cell. Indeed, landmark experiments in a model Cyanobacterium demonstrated that expressing a cytosolic CA alongside native Ci uptake greatly reduced intracellular Ci concentrations and inhibited photosynthesis (12). Here, we instead found that such a cycle is compatible with rubisco-dependent growth of two bacteria in relatively low CO2 (1.5% or lower).
We initially entertained a naive explanation for how CA expression might improve growth: that it increases the intracellular CO2 concentration relative to the reference strain expressing only rubisco. This could arise if rubisco activity depletes intracellular CO2 (Cin) significantly below its extracellular level (Cout) in the reference strain. In this setting, one might assume that CA activity accelerates the equilibration of CO2 across the membrane, thereby increasing Cin and carboxylation flux. However, this naive model cannot explain the growth benefits associated with expressing Ci uptake systems, which provide HCO3− and not CO2 (11, 13, 32). Moreover, the following calculation shows that this hypothesis is unreasonable precisely because CO2 is so membrane permeable that rubisco cannot deplete Cin much beneath Cout.
In a bacterium, rubisco might make up 20% of soluble protein at the very most (47). This amounts to a mass concentration of roughly 0.2 × 300 mg/ml ≈ 60 mg/ml rubisco (48). As each rubisco active site is attached to ≈60 kDa of protein (BNID 105007), the maximum rubisco active site concentration is ≈1 mM. In this naive model, Cin is set by the balance of passive uptake through the membrane, with effective permeability α = PC × SA/V ≈ 104 s−1, and fixation by rubisco, with an effective rate constant of γ = [rubisco] × kcat/KM < 103 s−1 (neglecting inhibition by O2). These values give a steady-state Cin of α Cout / (α + γ) > 0.9 Cout. That is, even an extreme level of rubisco activity cannot draw Cin beneath 90% of Cout. In such conditions, rubisco would fix ≈1010 CO2/hour, supporting a 1-2 h doubling time (see SI Appendix for full calculation). So, although the CO2 concentration is low in aqueous environments equilibrated with the present-day atmosphere (≈10–20 μM), passive CO2 uptake is expected to be very fast, giving intracellular CO2 concentrations nearly equal to extracellular ones and supporting substantial carboxylation flux. As Cin ≈ Cout, CA activity cannot substantially affect Cin or carboxylation flux in this setting.
We instead argue that the effects of expressing CA or Ci transport can be explained by the ubiquitous dependence of growth on HCO3− (49–52). It has been clear for at least 80 y that heterotrophs also require Ci for growth. Seminal investigations in the 1930s and 1940s advanced the hypothesis that this dependence is due to a specific requirement for HCO3− (53–56), which is now known to be the substrate of several carboxylation reactions involved in lipid, nucleotide, and arginine biosynthesis (49, 50, 57, 58). This explanation is now supported by experiments in several heterotrophs demonstrating that growth in ambient air can be supported either by CA activity (49–51) or by providing the products of central metabolic carboxylations in the growth media (50, 51). Similar CA mutant phenotypes were recently observed in a model plant (52), and the metabolic networks of microbial autotrophs indicate an equivalent dependence on HCO3− for anabolism (59, 60). We, therefore, advance a model of colimitation of autotrophic growth by both CO2− and HCO3−-dependent carboxylation fluxes, where most of the biomass carbon derives from rubisco-catalyzed carboxylation of CO2 and a small minority derives from HCO3− (Fig. 7A). We formalized this notion as a simplified linear differential equation model fully described in SI Appendix. This model intentionally omits several facets of autotrophic physiology for the sake of simplicity (e.g., enzyme saturation, rubisco oxygenation) and is therefore designed for coarse, order-of-magnitude comparisons with data, not direct quantitative correspondence.
We first used our model to confirm that rubisco should not be expected to deplete intracellular CO2. Only when rubisco activity was very high or the modeled CO2 permeability was implausibly low could the intracellular CO2 (Cin) be depleted beneath 50% of the extracellular level (Cout). Furthermore, when Cin ≈ Cout, neither CA activity nor Ci uptake meaningfully increased the modeled rubisco carboxylation flux (SI Appendix, Fig. S13). When the HCO3− dependence of biomass precursor production was included in our model, however, it became possible to rationalize the growth improvements associated with heterologous expression of a CA or Ci transporter, as both of these activities can supply HCO3- needed for anabolic carboxylations (Fig. 7A). When the modeled rubisco activity was low (lighter colored lines in Fig. 7B), growth was rubisco-limited: increasing rubisco activity (moving toward darker colors in Fig. 7B) or the CO2 concentration (SI Appendix, Fig. S12C) produced faster growth, but the growth rate was insensitive to CA activity because slow CO2 hydration already provided sufficient HCO3− for the anabolic carboxylations involved in lipid, nucleotide, and amino acid biosynthesis (SI Appendix, Figs. S12–S13). When rubisco activity was set to higher values (darker lines in Fig. 7B), the model entered a “bicarboxylation-limited” regime where increased rubisco activity did not affect the growth rate until CA activity was increased to supply HCO3− (i.e., bicarbonate) for anabolic carboxylations. In bicarboxylation-limited conditions, additional HCO3− could be supplied by CA, Ci uptake, or both (Fig. S12). However, these activities are not equivalent, as we discuss below.
The colimitation model also gave insight into the nature of the supposed “futile cycle,” which could now be framed quantitatively by comparing the leakage of Ci from the cell (flux JL,tot = JL,C + JL,H) to biomass production by rubisco- and HCO3−-dependent carboxylases (JB, Fig. 7A). As CO2 is orders of magnitude more membrane permeable than HCO3− near neutral pH (13), CO2 leakage (JL,C) greatly exceeded the HCO3− leakage flux (JL,H) in most modeled conditions. Low Ci leakage is desirable; when JL,tot ≈ 0, the flux of Ci pumped into the cell is balanced by fixation of CO2 and HCO3− such that no energy is “wasted” on Ci uptake. When CA (δ) and Ci uptake (χ) activities were low, the model predicted slow growth and net diffusive Ci uptake (JL,C, JL,H < 0) to balance carboxylation (Fig. 7C and SI Appendix, Fig. S15). Increasing Ci uptake (χ) could cause JL,tot to change sign from negative (connoting passive uptake) to positive (connoting leakage) passing through JL,tot = 0. If CA was also expressed—i.e., if δ was increased above a baseline value—JL,tot ≈ 0 could be achieved at lower Ci uptake activities due to CA-catalyzed dehydration of imported HCO3− producing CO2 used by rubisco. In other words, CA activity lowers the Ci uptake rate and, consequently, energy expenditure required to achieve the same rate of biomass production (Fig. 7C and SI Appendix, Fig. S15). When both activities were high, the model predicted substantial leakage, with JL,tot / JB ≈ 100 in extreme cases. Such extreme levels of futile cycling are likely incompatible with growth. If Ci uptake was low, in contrast, CA activity could be increased arbitrarily without incurring leakage because CAs do not pump Ci into the cell (Fig. 7C).
A second, less plausible way in which coexpression might improve growth is if CA and Ci transport are fast and membrane permeability to CO2 is far lower than typically assumed. In this case, the combination of Ci uptake and CA activity might form a CO2 pump that elevates Cin substantially above Cout to accelerate rubisco carboxylation (SI Appendix, Fig. S14). As HCO3− is supplied sufficiently by Ci uptake in this case, the colimitation model predicted that increased rubisco fluxes would translate into faster growth. For this effect to arise, however, the membrane permeability to CO2 would have to be 100–1,000 times lower than the measured (45) or calculated (46), so CO2 pumping is unlikely to explain the capacity of a CCMB1 to grow in ambient air when coexpressing Dab2 and Can (Fig. 6).
Taken together, our experiments and model helped outline a plausible trajectory for the coevolution of the bacterial CCM with atmospheric CO2 levels. Presuming an ancestral autotroph with only a rubisco-driven CBB cycle and no CCM components, our data and model support a trajectory where CA and Ci transport are acquired together or serially (in either order) to support growth as atmospheric CO2 levels decreased (darker arrows in Fig. 1C). The order of acquisition might depend on the environmental pH, which strongly affects the extracellular HCO3− concentration and, thereby, the expected efficacy of HCO3− uptake (13). The colimitation model helped us understand the potential advantages of expressing CA and Ci uptake together: modest coexpression can reduce energy expended on Ci pumping and balance the supply of CO2 and HCO3− with the cellular demand for rubisco and bicarboxylation products (Fig. 7C and SI Appendix, Fig. S15). In CCMB1, we found that the coexpression of CA and Ci transport supported growth in low CO2 environments (≈1%, Fig. 4) and even permitted modest growth in atmosphere (Fig. 6); cells expressing both activities would have been “primed” for the subsequent acquisition and refinement of proto-carboxysome structures that coencapsulate rubisco and CA to enable robust growth at yet lower CO2 levels (e.g., ambient air, Fig. 3). Notably, carboxysome shell proteins are structurally related to two ubiquitous protein families (25) and homologous to other metabolic microcompartments (14, 25), suggesting two plausible routes for the acquisition of carboxysome genes.
Results from our E. coli experiments suggest that these evolutionary trajectories are “fitness positive” in that each step improves growth as environmental CO2 levels decrease (Figs. 3, 4, and 6). Moreover, the contribution of CA and Ci transport activities was only realized at intermediate pCO2 ≈ 1% in both E. coli (Fig. 4) and the chemoautotroph C. necator (Fig. 5), supporting the view that CO2 concentrations declining from high levels earlier in Earth history promoted the evolutionary emergence of bacterial CCMs (10).
Concluding Remarks
There is great and longstanding interest in characterizing the composition of the atmosphere over Earth history (7, 8, 26, 61–63). This interest is surely justified as the contents of the atmosphere affected the temperature, climate, and the chemical conditions in which life arose, evolved, and has been maintained. In the case of reactive species like O2, the present-day measurements of old sedimentary rocks are quite informative: proxies for O2 reactivity in geological samples demonstrate that the ancient atmosphere contained very little O2, with inferred levels of 1 ppm or less in the Archean Eon, 4–2.5 billion years ago (6, 7). The emergence of oxygenic photosynthesis in Cyanobacteria led to the “Great Oxidation Event” ≈2.5 billion years ago (64) and atmospheric O2 levels have increased in a punctuated fashion since (65). Geochemical models and proxies generally agree that the ancient atmosphere was also CO2 rich, with atmospheric CO2 levels generally declining over the last 3 billion years due to geochemical cycles and organic carbon burial (7, 8,26, 63).
Here, we used the tools of synthetic biology to ask whether the history of atmospheric CO2 helps resolve the apparent “irreducible complexity” of the bacterial CCM, which enables autotrophic growth in the present-day atmosphere (0.04% CO2, 21% O2) only when all genetic components are intact (Fig. 1B). Irreducible complexity is incompatible with evolution by natural selection, and so we hypothesized that partial CCMs conferred a growth advantage in the historical environments in which they arose, which we presume were characterized by higher levels of CO2 than found in today’s atmosphere (7, 63).
Results from our experiments with rubisco-dependent E. coli and two bacterial autotrophs—H. neapolitanus and C. necator—supported this rationalization of CCM evolution by showing i) that CO2 ≈ 1% (25 PAL) improves the growth of organisms harboring partial CCMs (Figs. 3–6) and ii) that all CCM genes are dispensable during growth in 5-10% CO2 (Figs. 2–5). This latter result suggested to us that atmospheric CO2 concentrations exceeded 1% of a 1 bar atmosphere when rubisco arose, which was likely more than 3 billion years ago (21, 66). If geological CO2 sinks later brought atmospheric CO2 to ≈1%, all organisms, including autotrophs, would have begun to evolve or acquire CAs and/or Ci transporters to provide the HCO3− required for biosynthesis (Fig. 7). An ancestral autotroph expressing both of these activities may have had a growth advantage in relatively lower CO2 pressures < 1% (Fig. 6) and would have been “primed” for the evolution of a CCM as the only missing component, the carboxysome, could have evolved from oligomeric host proteins (25) or may have been adapted from a different metabolic microcompartment (14). Alternatively, it is possible that CAs (or Ci transporters) arose prior to rubisco and were already widespread at the time of rubisco evolution, in which case we might expect CO2 ≳ 1% when rubisco arose. Unfortunately, the convergent evolution of CA activity in several protein families (67) makes it very challenging to constrain the timing of CA evolution with comparative biological and molecular clock approaches; this issue concerns bacterial Ci transporters as well (11, 20).
While we focused here on understanding the relationship between atmospheric CO2 and the emergence of bacterial CCMs, O2 is a competitive inhibitor of rubisco carboxylation (4, 5) and atmospheric O2 levels have increased dramatically over Earth history (68). A full description of CCM evolution should therefore account for atmospheric O2 as well as CO2. However, many CO2-fixing organisms, including Cyanobacteria, algae, plants, and all those studied here, often utilize O2 in their metabolisms. CCMB1 E. coli respires glycerol (2), while H. neapolitanus uses O2 as the preferred terminal electron acceptor during chemoautotrophic growth (69), as does C. necator (37). Since O2 is used for fundamental bioenergetic needs, the O2 dependence of growth cannot be used as a proxy for the effect of O2 on the CCM, at least for the bacteria studied here.
It is intrinsically difficult to answer questions about Earth’s deep biological history; addressing such questions will surely require cooperation between scientific disciplines. Here, we took a “synthetic biological” approach to study the molecular evolution of bacterial CO2 fixation by constructing contemporary cells intended to resemble ancient ones in certain ways (26, 66, 70). Our work highlighted the impact of environmental context (CO2 concentrations) and whole cell physiology (the requirement for HCO3−) on the evolution of CO2 fixation. That is, neither rubisco nor the CCM should be considered in isolation, but rather in the context of a metabolism that demands both CO2 and HCO3− for growth. We hope that future research advances the synthetic approach to studying evolution and fully expect that this approach will enrich our understanding of biological processes that have shaped the evolution of biogeochemical cycles on Earth.
Methods
Strains, Plasmids, and Genomic Modifications.
Strains and plasmids used in this study are documented in SI Appendix, Tables S4 and S5. The rubisco-dependent E. coli strain CCMB1 was derived from E. coli BW25113 and has the genotype BW25113 ΔrpiAB Δedd ΔcynT Δcan, as documented in ref. 2. To construct CA-deficient mutants of C. necator H16, we first knocked out the hdsR homolog A0006 as removal of this restriction enzyme increases electroporation efficiency (37). The CA knockout, C. necator H16 ΔA0006 Δcan Δcaa, was constructed by repeated rounds of selection and counter selection by integrating a construct encoding both kanamycin resistance and sacB for counter selection. Protocols for plasmid construction and genomic modification of C. necator are fully described in the SI Appendix.
Genome-Wide Fitness Measurements in H. neapolitanus.
Competitive fitness assays were performed following (20). The barcoded H. neapolitanus transposon library generated for that work was thawed and used to inoculate three 33 ml cultures that were grown overnight at 30 C in DSMZ-68 (pH 6.8) with 10 μg/ml kanamycin. These precultures were grown to an OD ≈ 0.07 (600 nm) in 5% CO2. The library was subsequently back diluted 1:64 and grown in various CO2 concentrations (10%, 5%, 1.5%, 0.5%, and ambient CO2) on a platform shaker (New Brunswick Scientific Innova 2000, 250 RPM) in a Percival Intellus Incubator configured to mix pure CO2 with laboratory air to reach the desired CO2 partial pressure; 20 ml of preculture was pelleted by centrifugation (15 min at 4,000 g) and saved as a T0 reference. Upon reaching 6.5–7.5 doublings, 50 ml of culture was spun down and gDNA was extracted for barcode PCRs as described in ref. 6; barcodes were previously mapped to the genome via TnSeq (20). PCRs were purified (Zymo Research Clean and Concentrator kit) and pooled for sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq with 150 bp single-end reads. We used the software pipeline from ref. 28 to analyze barcode abundance data. Briefly, fitness of individual mutant strains was calculated as the log2 of the ratio of barcode abundance in the experimental condition over abundance in the T0. Gene-level fitness values were then calculated considering all transposon insertions expected to disrupt an individual gene. Each CO2 concentration was tested in biological duplicate except for 5% CO2, which was assayed in biological quadruplicate.
E. coli Growth Conditions.
E. coli strains were grown at 37°C. 60 μg/ml kanamycin and 25 μg/ml chloramphenicol were used for selection during routine cloning and propagation. For strains carrying two selectable markers, antibiotics were used at half concentration (30 μg/ml kanamycin, 12.5 μg/ml chloramphenicol). All CCMB1 cultures were grown in 10% CO2 unless otherwise specified. When rubisco-independent growth was desired, CCMB1 was propagated in rich LB media. CCMB1 was cultured in a rubisco-dependent manner in M9 minimal media (pH 7.0) supplemented with trace elements and 0.4% glycerol (v/v) as described in ref. 2. Experiments presented in Figs. 3, 4, and 6 were conducted in 96-well plates in a gas-controlled plate reader (Tecan Spark) configured to mix pure CO2 with laboratory air to reach a defined CO2 partial pressure. For the data in Fig. 3, 100 nM anhydrous tetracycline (aTc) was supplied to induce expression from p1A, pCB’, and pCCM’ plasmids. For the data presented in Figs. 4 and 6, a constitutive version of p1A was used (p1Ac) and aTc was omitted from precultures. These strains also carried a dual-expression plasmid, pFC, for inducible expression of the DAB2 Ci transport operon and the can CA. 100 nM aTc was supplied to induce DAB2 and 1 mM IPTG for can.
Precultures were inoculated into 5 ml of M9 glycerol with 30 μg/ml kanamycin, 12.5 μg/ml chloramphenicol, and appropriate induction. 1 ml of each culture was transferred to a separate tube, which was incubated in ambient CO2 as a negative control; the remaining 4 ml was incubated in 10% CO2. CCMB1 strains carrying active site mutants of rubisco (cbbL K194M) were precultured in LB with the same antibiotic concentrations. Once cultures reached saturation, they were centrifuged at 4000 g for 8 min. Pellets were washed in 10 ml of M9 with no carbon source (M9 NoC) and resuspended in 5 ml M9 NoC. Optical density was measured in fivefold dilution at 600 nm (Genesys 20 spectrophotometer, Thermo Scientific), and cultures were normalized to 0.5 OD units. 96-well plates were inoculated by adding 2.5 μl of OD-normalized preculture to 247.5 μl M9 glycerol supplemented with appropriate antibiotics and induction to a starting density of 0.005 OD600. Kanamycin was omitted as the plasmid carrying kanamycin resistance also expresses rubisco, which is required for growth in glycerol media (2). To minimize evaporation during multiday cultivations, 150 μl sterile water was added to the reservoirs between the wells and the plate was incubated inside of a small humidity cassette (Tecan) with 3 ml sterile water added to each reservoir. The plates were incubated with shaking for at least 4 d in a Tecan Spark plate reader configured to control the CO2 concentration and measure the culture density (OD600) every 30 min. The humidity cassette was replenished after 48 h. All experiments were performed in biological quadruplicate and technical triplicate.
C. necator Growth Conditions.
C. necator strains were grown in ambient CO2 unless otherwise specified, and 200 μg/ml kanamycin was added to select for plasmid retention. When rubisco-independent heterotrophic growth was desired, C. necator was cultured in LB at 30°C. For autotrophic growth experiments, strains were precultured in 5 mL of LB media in 10% CO2 in 25 mL tubes with 20 mm butyl stoppers sealed by aluminum crimping. Precultures were incubated for 2 d at 30°C with 200 rpm shaking, washed three times in Cupriavidus minimal media (pH 6.7), and inoculated to an OD of 0.1 (550 nm) in minimal media in a 165-mL flask with a 20-mm butyl stopper sealed by aluminum crimping. Cupriavidus minimal growth media contained 3.24 mM MgSO4, 0.42 mM CaCl2, 33.5 mM NaH2PO4, 32.25 mM Na2HPO4, 2.6 mM K2SO4, 1 mM NaOH, 1.87 mM NH4Cl, and 1 mL/L of a 1000× trace mineral solution containing 480 mg/L CuSO4·5H2O, 2.4 g/L ZnSO4·7H2O, 2.4 g/L MnSO4·H2O, and 15 g/L FeSO4·7H2O (pH 6.7). The flasks were evacuated, and the headspace was filled with 60% H2, 10% O2, and indicated concentrations of CO2. The balance was air. Cells were grown for 48 h at 30°C with 200 rpm shaking, and OD550 values were taken using a Molecular Devices SpectraMax M2 spectrophotometer.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We dedicate this paper to the memory of Danny Salah Tawfik (z”l), a luminary to the scientific community and a dear friend and mentor to A.I.F. Danny’s many studies of enzyme evolution taught us that evolutionary timescales are accessible in carefully designed lab-scale experiments and his active cultivation of relationships that transcend generational, professional, and cultural divides continues to inspire. We are also indebted to Arren Bar-Even (z”l) for formative conversations guiding this work. Many thanks to Darcy McRose, Elad Noor, and Renee Wang for extensive comments on the manuscript and to Cecilia Blikstad, Julia Borden, Vahe Galstyan, Josh Goldford, Ron Milo, Robert Nichols, Naiya Phillips, Noam Prywes, and Gabe Salmon for helpful input. This research was supported in part by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (to A.I.F), NSF Grant No. PHY-1748958, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Grant No. 2919.02, and the Kavli Foundation (to A.I.F), Schwartz/Reisman Collaborative Science Program (to W.W.F.), the US Department of Energy (DE-SC00016240 to D.F.S.), and Royal Dutch Shell (Energy and Biosciences Institute project CW163755 to D.F.S. and S.W.S.).
Author contributions
A.I.F., E.D., W.W.F., and D.F.S. designed research; A.I.F., E.D., J.P., J.J.D., and L.M.O. performed research; S.W.S. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; A.I.F., E.D., J.P., J.J.D., L.M.O., W.W.F., and D.F.S. analyzed data; and A.I.F. and E.D. wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Footnotes
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Contributor Information
Avi I. Flamholz, Email: aflamhol@caltech.edu.
David F. Savage, Email: savage@berkeley.edu.
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
Heterogeneous data on microbial growth data have been deposited in [GitHub] (https://github.com/flamholz/ccm_evolution). Previously published data were used for this work (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0520-8).
Supporting Information
References
- 1.Bathellier C., Tcherkez G., Lorimer G. H., Farquhar G. D., Rubisco is not really so bad. Plant Cell Environ. 41, 705–716 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Flamholz A. I., et al. , Functional reconstitution of a bacterial CO2 concentrating mechanism in E. coli. Elife 9, e59882 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Iñiguez C., et al. , Evolutionary trends in RuBisCO kinetics and their co-evolution with CO2 concentrating mechanisms. Plant J. 101, 897–918 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bowes G., Ogren W. L., Hageman R. H., Phosphoglycolate production catalyzed by ribulose diphosphate carboxylase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 45, 716–722 (1971). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Flamholz A. I., et al. , Revisiting trade-offs between rubisco kinetic parameters. Biochemistry 58, 3365–3376 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fischer W. W., Hemp J., Johnson J. E., Evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 44, 647–683 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 7.Catling D. C., Zahnle K. J., The Archean atmosphere. Sci. Adv. 6, eaax1420 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fischer W. W., et al. , Isotopic constraints on the Late Archean carbon cycle from the Transvaal Supergroup along the western margin of the Kaapvaal Craton, South Africa. Precambrian Res. 169, 15–27 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Berner R. A., Lasaga A. C., Garrels R. M., The carbonate-silicate geochemical cycle and its effect on atmospheric carbon dioxide over the past 100 million years. Am. J. Sci. 283, 641–683 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Flamholz A., Shih P. M., Cell biology of photosynthesis over geologic time. Curr. Biol. 30, R490–R494 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rae B. D., Long B. M., Badger M. R., Price G. D., Functions, compositions, and evolution of the two types of carboxysomes: Polyhedral microcompartments that facilitate CO2 fixation in cyanobacteria and some proteobacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 77, 357–379 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Price G. D., Badger M. R., Expression of human carbonic anhydrase in the Cyanobacterium Synechococcus PCC7942 creates a High CO2-requiring phenotype evidence for a central role for carboxysomes in the CO2 concentrating mechanism. Plant Physiol. 91, 505–513 (1989). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mangan N. M., Flamholz A., Hood R. D., Milo R., Savage D. F., pH determines the energetic efficiency of the cyanobacterial CO2 concentrating mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, E5354–62 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Axen S. D., Erbilgin O., Kerfeld C. A., A taxonomy of bacterial microcompartment loci constructed by a novel scoring method. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003898 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Whitehead L., Long B. M., Price G. D., Badger M. R., Comparing the in vivo function of α-Carboxysomes and β-Carboxysomes in two model Cyanobacteria. Plant Physiol. 165, 398–411 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Marcus Y., Schwarz R., Friedberg D., Kaplan A., High CO2 requiring mutant of anacystis nidulans R2. Plant Physiol. 82, 610–612 (1986). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ogawa T., Kaneda T., Omata T., A mutant of Synechococcus PCC7942 incapable of adapting to low CO2 concentration. Plant Physiol. 84, 711–715 (1987). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Price G. D., Badger M. R., Isolation and characterization of high CO2-requiring-mutants of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus PCC7942: Two phenotypes that accumulate inorganic carbon but are apparently unable to generate CO2 within the carboxysome. Plant Physiol. 91, 514–525 (1989). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pierce J., Carlson T. J., Williams J. G., A cyanobacterial mutant requiring the expression of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase from a photosynthetic anaerobe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 5753–5757 (1989). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Desmarais J. J., et al. , DABs are inorganic carbon pumps found throughout prokaryotic phyla. Nat Microbiol 4, 2204–2215 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nisbet E. G., et al. , The age of Rubisco: The evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis. Geobiology 5, 311–335 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 22.Young J. N., Rickaby R. E. M., Kapralov M. V., Filatov D. A., Adaptive signals in algal Rubisco reveal a history of ancient atmospheric carbon dioxide. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 367, 483–492 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Long B. M., Förster B., Pulsford S. B., Price G. D., Badger M. R., Rubisco proton production can drive the elevation of CO2 within condensates and carboxysomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Smith K. S., Jakubzick C., Whittam T. S., Ferry J. G., Carbonic anhydrase is an ancient enzyme widespread in prokaryotes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 15184–15189 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Krupovic M., Koonin E. V., Cellular origin of the viral capsid-like bacterial microcompartments. Biol. Direct 12, 25 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hurley S. J., Wing B. A., Jasper C. E., Hill N. C., Cameron J. C., Carbon isotope evidence for the global physiology of Proterozoic cyanobacteria. Sci. Adv. 7, eabc8998 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shively J. M., Ball F., Brown D. H., Saunders R. E., Functional organelles in prokaryotes: Polyhedral inclusions (carboxysomes) of Thiobacillus neapolitanus. Science 182, 584–586 (1973). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wetmore K. M., et al. , Rapid quantification of mutant fitness in diverse bacteria by sequencing randomly bar-coded transposons. MBio 6, e00306-15 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bonacci W., et al. , Modularity of a carbon-fixing protein organelle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 478–483 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Oltrogge L. M., et al. , Multivalent interactions between CsoS2 and Rubisco mediate α-carboxysome formation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 281–287 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.MacCready J. S., Tran L., Basalla J. L., Hakim P., Vecchiarelli A. G., The McdAB system positions α-carboxysomes in proteobacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 116, 277–297 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liu L.-N., Advances in the bacterial organelles for CO2 fixation. Trends Microbiol. 30, 567–580 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Scott K. M., et al. , Diversity in CO2-concentrating mechanisms among Chemolithoautotrophs from the Genera Hydrogenovibrio, Thiomicrorhabdus, and Thiomicrospira, Ubiquitous in Sulfidic habitats Worldwide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, 1–19 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cooper T. G., Filmer D., The active species of “CO2” utilized by ribulose diphosphate carboxylase. J. Biol. Chem. 244, 1081–1083 (1969). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Du J., Förster B., Rourke L., Howitt S. M., Price G. D., Characterisation of Cyanobacterial Bicarbonate transporters in E. coli shows that SbtA homologs are functional in this heterologous expression system. PLoS One 9, e115905 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Badger M. R., Bek E. J., Multiple Rubisco forms in proteobacteria: Their functional significance in relation to CO2 acquisition by the CBB cycle. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 1525–1541 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Panich J., Fong B., Singer S. W., Metabolic engineering of Cupriavidus necator H16 for sustainable biofuels from CO2. Trends Biotechnol. 39, 412–424 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schlegel H. G., Kaltwasser H., Gottschalk G., Ein Submersverfahren zur Kultur wasserstoffoxydierender Bakterien: Wachstumsphysiologische Untersuchungen. Arch. Microbiol. 38, 209–222 (1961). [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ahrens W., Schlegel H. G., Carbon dioxide requiring mutants of Hydrogenomonas eutropha strain H 16. I. Growth and Co2-fixation. Arch. Mikrobiol. 85, 142–152 (1972). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Aragno M., in “Thermophilic, aerobic, hydrogen-oxidizing (Knallgas) bacteria” in The Prokaryotes: A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria: Ecophysiology, Isolation, Identification, Applications, Balows A., Trüper H. G., Dworkin M., Harder W., Schleifer K.-H., Eds. (Springer, New York, 1992), pp. 3917–3933. [Google Scholar]
- 41.de Beer D., Glud A., Epping E., KÛhl M., A fast-responding CO2 microelectrode for profiling sediments, microbial mats, and biofilms. Limnol. Oceanogr. 42, 1590–1600 (1997). [Google Scholar]
- 42.Claassens N. J., et al. , Phosphoglycolate salvage in a chemolithoautotroph using the Calvin cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117, 22452–22461 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kusian B., Sültemeyer D., Bowien B., Carbonic anhydrase is essential for growth of ralstonia eutropha at ambient CO2 concentrations. J. Bacteriol. 184, 5018–5026 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gai C. S., Lu J., Brigham C. J., Bernardi A. C., Sinskey A. J., Insights into bacterial CO2 metabolism revealed by the characterization of four carbonic anhydrases in Ralstonia eutropha H16. AMB Express 4, 2 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gutknecht J., Bisson M. A., Tosteson F. C., Diffusion of carbon dioxide through lipid bilayer membranes: Effects of carbonic anhydrase, bicarbonate, and unstirred layers. J. Gen. Physiol. 69, 779–794 (1977). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hannesschlaeger C., Horner A., Pohl P., Intrinsic membrane permeability to small molecules. Chem. Rev. 119, 5922–5953 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Liebermeister W., et al. , Visual account of protein investment in cellular functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 8488–8493 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Milo R., What is the total number of protein molecules per cell volume? A call to rethink some published values. Bioessays 35, 1050–1055 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Merlin C., Masters M., McAteer S., Coulson A., Why is carbonic anhydrase essential to Escherichia coli? J. Bacteriol. 185, 6415–6424 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Aguilera J., Van Dijken J. P., De Winde J. H., Pronk J. T., Carbonic anhydrase (Nce103p): An essential biosynthetic enzyme for growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at atmospheric carbon dioxide pressure. Biochem. J. 391, 311–316 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Burghout P., et al. , Carbonic anhydrase is essential for Streptococcus pneumoniae growth in environmental ambient air. J. Bacteriol. 192, 4054–4062 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hines K. M., Chaudhari V., Edgeworth K. N., Owens T. G., Hanson M. R., Absence of carbonic anhydrase in chloroplasts affects C3 plant development but not photosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2107425118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gladstone G. P., Fildes P., Richardson G. M., Carbon dioxide as an essential factor in the growth of bacteria. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 16, 335 (1935). [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wood H. G., Werkman C. H., Hemingway A., Nier A. O., Mechanism of fixation of carbon dioxide in the Krebs cycle. J. Biol. Chem. 139, 483–484 (1941). [Google Scholar]
- 55.Krebs H. A., Carbon dioxide assimilation in heterotrophic organisms. Nature 147, 560–563 (1941). [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lwoff A., Monod J., Essai d’analyse du role de l’anhydride carbonique dans la croissance microbienne. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 73, 323–347 (1947). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Knowles J. R., The mechanism of biotin-dependent enzymes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 58, 195–221 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mathews I. I., Kappock T. J., Stubbe J., Ealick S. E., Crystal structure of Escherichia coli PurE, an unusual mutase in the purine biosynthetic pathway. Structure 7, 1395–1406 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Park J. M., Kim T. Y., Lee S. Y., Genome-scale reconstruction and in silico analysis of the Ralstonia eutropha H16 for polyhydroxyalkanoate synthesis, lithoautotrophic growth, and 2-methyl citric acid production. BMC Syst. Biol. 5, 101 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Knoop H., et al. , Flux balance analysis of Cyanobacterial metabolism: The metabolic network of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003081 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Berkner L. V., Marshall L. C., N.A.S. Symposium on the evolution of the Earth’s atmosphere: History of major atmospheric components. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 53, 1215 (1965). [Google Scholar]
- 62.Freeman K. H., Hayes J. M., Fractionation of carbon isotopes by phytoplankton and estimates of ancient CO 2 levels. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 6, 185–198 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Crockford P. W., et al. , Triple oxygen isotope evidence for limited mid-Proterozoic primary productivity. Nature 559, 613–616 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kasting J. F., What caused the rise of atmospheric O2? Chem. Geol. 362, 13–25 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sessions A. L., Doughty D. M., Welander P. V., Summons R. E., Newman D. K., The continuing puzzle of the great oxidation event. Curr. Biol. 19, R567–R574 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Shih P. M., et al. , Biochemical characterization of predicted Precambrian RuBisCO. Nat. Commun. 7, 10382 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Supuran C. T., Carbonic anhydrases and metabolism. Metabolites 8, 25 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Fischer W. W., Hemp J., Valentine J. S., How did life survive Earth’s great oxygenation?. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 31, 166–178 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Visser J. M., Robertson L. A., Van Verseveld H. W., Kuenen J. G., Sulfur production by obligately chemolithoautotrophic thiobacillus species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 2300–2305 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kędzior M., et al. , Resurrected Rubisco suggests uniform carbon isotope signatures over geologic time. Cell Rep. 39, 110726 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Heterogeneous data on microbial growth data have been deposited in [GitHub] (https://github.com/flamholz/ccm_evolution). Previously published data were used for this work (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0520-8).