Skip to main content
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
editorial
. 2023 Jan 20;14:1137001. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1137001

Editorial: Ca2+ signalling in plant biotic interactions

Thomas A DeFalco 1,*, Wolfgang Moeder 2,*, Keiko Yoshioka 2,*
PMCID: PMC9895960  PMID: 36743485

Calcium ions (Ca2+) serve as a universal second messenger across eukaryotes (Clapham, 2007). In the paradigm of Ca2+ signalling, stimuli trigger rapid changes in free Ca2+ concentration via the coordinated activities of Ca2+-permeable channels, pumps, and antiporters (‘encoding’) (McAinsh and Pittman, 2009). These signals can occur across cellular compartments (Resentini et al., 2021) where they are sensed via suites of Ca2+-binding sensor proteins (‘decoding’), which in turn regulate numerous downstream cellular processes, ultimately eliciting stimulus-appropriate physiological responses (DeFalco et al., 2010). Great progress has been made in the past decade in the development and deployment of new tools to monitor and visualize in vivo calcium signals (Grenzi et al., 2021), spurring a renaissance in the field of plant Ca2+ signalling.

In keeping with its evolutionarily-conserved and universal role, Ca2+ signalling is central to diverse aspects of plant development as well as responses to environmental perturbations (Kudla et al., 2018), including, notably, biotic stimuli (Tian et al., 2020; Köster et al., 2022; Xu et al., 2022). Ca2+ fluxes are among the earliest detectable responses to the perception of pathogens and pests (Yu et al., 2017; DeFalco and Zipfel, 2021) as well as symbiotic microbes (Tian et al., 2020), and as such have been a major area of focus in molecular plant biotic interaction research in recent years. Such work has led to key recent discoveries in the field of biotic interactions, including the identification of numerous Ca2+ channels playing roles in both cell surface and intracellular immunity (Bi et al., 2021; Bjornson et al., 2021; Jacob et al., 2021; Köster et al., 2022; Xu et al., 2022).

In this Research Topic issue, several important aspects of Ca2+ signalling in the context of plant biotic interactions have been advanced. Ca2+ signalling is a central component of many stress response pathways in plants, and Patra et al provide an overview of Ca2+ signalling networks in both abiotic and biotic stress contexts. One of the key downstream effectors of Ca2+ signalling in immunity is the transcriptional regulator CAMTA3/AtSR1, which is regulated by the central Ca2+ sensor calmodulin (CaM) and acts as an executor of the general stress response (Bjornson et al., 2021). Here, Yuan et al provide a detailed summary of the functions of this transcription factor in immunity, its regulation by CaM and phosphorylation, and its guarding by intracellular immune receptors.

While Ca2+ signalling is one of the early hallmarks in response to immune elicitors such as the bacterial flagellin-derived epitope flg22, whether such signals are altered in the context of immune priming was unknown. Eichstadt et al developed an approach to examine Ca2+ signals in both local and systemic leaves upon immune elicitation using the ratiometric fluorescent calcium indicator R-GECO1-mTurquoise, which allowed them to determine that immune priming does not alter rapid Ca2+ signalling dynamics in distal tissues.

Many Ca2+-permeable channels have been implicated in plant biotic responses, including members of the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel (CNGC) family (DeFalco et al., 2016). Sun et al report that CNGC2, a well-studied member of this family, contributes to the Ca2+ signal induced by extracellular ATP (eATP), which acts as an immune elicitor upon cellular damage in plants. Finally, while most signalling work has been performed using model plants such as Arabidopsis, Zhou et al have examined how Ca2+ signalling and transporters contribute to flagellin-induced immune responses in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), identifying a Ca2+ efflux transporter as a potential regulator of defenses to Verticillium wilt.

The tools available to researchers that allow for monitoring of in planta Ca2+ dynamics continue to expand and improve (Waadt et al., 2021), allowing for ever-more complex and detailed study of Ca2+ signals, from organelles to single cells to whole plants. Recent insights have also expanded our understanding of the repertoire of Ca2+-permeable channels in plants and their potential functions in plant immunity (Köster et al., 2022; Xu et al., 2022). Such breakthroughs have opened key questions for the field, which is poised for fundamental discoveries in coming years.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Funding Statement

Research in the authors’ laboratories is generously funded by Western University (start-up funding and a Western Strategic Support NSERC-Seed Grant to TAD) and a Discovery Grant from the National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC, PGPIN-2019-05832) to KY.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Bi G., Su M., Li N., Liang Y., Dang S., Xu J., et al. (2021). The ZAR1 resistosome is a calcium-permeable channel triggering plant immune signaling. Cell 184, 3528–3541.e12. doi:  10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bjornson M., Pimprikar P., Nürnberger T., Zipfel C. (2021). The transcriptional landscape of arabidopsis thaliana pattern-triggered immunity. Nat. Plants 7, 579–586. doi:  10.1038/s41477-021-00874-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clapham D. E. (2007). Calcium signaling. Cell 131, 1047–1058. doi:  10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DeFalco T. A., Bender K. W., Snedden W. A. (2010). Breaking the code: Ca2+ sensors in plant signalling. Biochem. J. 425, 27–40. doi: 10.1042/BJ20091147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DeFalco T. A., Moeder W., Yoshioka K. (2016). Opening the gates: Insights into cyclic nucleotide-gated channel-mediated signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 21, 903–906. doi:  10.1016/j.tplants.2016.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DeFalco T. A., Zipfel C. (2021). Molecular mechanisms of early plant pattern-triggered immune signaling. Mol. Cell 81, 3449–3467. doi:  10.1016/j.molcel.2021.07.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grenzi M., Resentini F., Vanneste S., Zottini M., Bassi A., Costa A. (2021). Illuminating the hidden world of calcium ions in plants with a universe of indicators. Plant Physiol. 187, 550–571. doi:  10.1093/plphys/kiab339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jacob P., Kim N. H., Wu F., El-Kasmi F., Chi Y., Walton W. G., et al. (2021). Plant “helper” immune receptors are Ca2+-permeable nonselective cation channels. Science 373, 420–425. doi:  10.1126/science.abg7917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Köster P., DeFalco T. A., Zipfel C. (2022). Ca 2+ signals in plant immunity. EMBO J. 41, e110741. doi:  10.15252/embj.2022110741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kudla J., Becker D., Grill E., Hedrich R., Hippler M., Kummer U., et al. (2018). Advances and current challenges in calcium signaling. New Phytol. 218, 414–431. doi:  10.1111/nph.14966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McAinsh M. R., Pittman J. K. (2009). Shaping the calcium signature. New Phytol. 181, 275–294. doi:  10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02682.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Resentini F., Ruberti C., Grenzi M., Bonza M. C., Costa A. (2021). The signatures of organellar calcium. Plant Physiol. 187, 1985–2004. doi:  10.1093/plphys/kiab189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tian W., Wang C., Gao Q., Li L., Luan S. (2020). Calcium spikes, waves and oscillations in plant development and biotic interactions. Nat. Plants 6, 750–759. doi:  10.1038/s41477-020-0667-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Waadt R., Kudla J., Kollist H. (2021). Multiparameter in vivo imaging in plants using genetically encoded fluorescent indicator multiplexing. Plant Physiol. 187, 537–549. doi:  10.1093/plphys/kiab399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Xu G., Moeder W., Yoshioka K., Shan L. (2022). A tale of many families: Calcium channels in plant immunity. Plant Cell 34, 1551–1567. doi:  10.1093/plcell/koac033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yu X., Feng B., He P., Shan L. (2017). From chaos to harmony: Responses and signaling upon microbial pattern recognition. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 55, 109–137. doi:  10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES