Abstract
Introduction
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are critically involved in cancer immune suppression and MDSC density has been recognized as a robust prognostic biomarker. Here, we sought to characterize the densities and locations of CD11b+ MDSCs in primary oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and determine their prognostic significance.
Material and methods
A total of 144 eligible OSCC samples from a tertiary referral oral cancer center were retrospectively collected. Intensities of CD11b+ MDSCs at the tumor center (CT) and invasive margin (IM) in OSCC samples were detected by immunohistochemistry and automatically quantified using Image J software. The optimal cutoff values for CD11b CT and CD11b IM were determined by X-tile based on overall survival. The associations between CD11b+ MDSCs and clinicopathological parameters were assessed by the χ2 test. The prognostic value of CD11b+ MDSCs was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier plots, Cox regression analyses and receiver operating characteristics curves.
Results
High density of CD11b+ MDSCs at CT or IM was significantly associated with inferior overall and disease-free survival (Kaplan-Meir, p < 0.05, log-rank test). CD11b CT and CD11b IM were identified as independent prognostic predictors for patient survival. The prediction accuracy and specificity of CD11b CT and CD11b IM were superior to other prognostic parameters.
Conclusions
Our data indicated that increased densities of CD11b+ MDSCs in CT and IM regions were significantly associated with poor prognoses, which might be novel prognostic factors for OSCC.
Keywords: oral squamous cell carcinoma, myeloid derived suppressor cells, CD11b, prognostic biomarker
Introduction
The 5-year survival for patients with primary oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains at approximately 60%, which has not been markedly improved in the past decades [1]. Such a dismal prognosis is in part due to the high proportion of patients who present with advanced disease at the initial diagnosis. Insufficient and inaccurate evaluation of this malignancy hampers effective treatment planning and proper prognostic prediction. Nowadays, patients with OSCC are commonly staged according to the TNM staging system based on the tumor dimension, lymph node and metastasis [2]. However, owing to the heterogeneity of OSCC, patients with the same TNM stage usually present a significant variety of clinical outcomes [3]. Thus, identification of novel prognostic factors is urgently needed to better estimate survival and guide treatment planning.
The tumor microenvironment of solid cancer including OSCC is usually characterized by significant infiltration of both innate and adaptive immune cells including but not restricted to T cells, B cells and macrophages [4]. Mounting evidence has demonstrated that various types of tumor-infiltrating immune cells promote cancer initiation, overgrowth and metastatic dissemination [5]. Moreover, quantifications of these cancer-associated immune cells have robust prognostic significance in a broad spectrum of human cancer [6]. In particular, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), one of the major components of the tumor microenvironment, have emerged as a key regulatory cell population that critically participates in tumorigenesis [7]. Intensive studies have indicated MDSCs as a negative predictor of clinical outcomes in various cancers and a potential predictive biomarker in malignancies including melanoma, gastrointestinal and bladder cancer [8–10]. Currently, human MDSCs are usually labelled as CD11b+CD33+HLA–DR–Lin– and consist of two groups of cells termed polymorphonuclear (PMN-MDSCs, CD11b+CD33+CD14–CD15+HLA–DR–Lin–) and monocytic (M-MDSCs, CD11b+CD33+CD14+CD15–HLA–DR–Lin–) [11]. Several previous studies have used the CD11b to label tumor-infiltrating MDSCs by immunohistochemistry in various cancer contexts. Evaluation of CD11b+ MDSCs in the tumor center and microenvironment has been utilized to predict patients’ clinical outcome [11, 12]. For example, high densities of CD11b+ MDSCs were significantly associated with unfavorable survival of patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma [13]. However, to the best of our knowledge, the prognostic value of CD11b+ MDSCs infiltration in OSCC remains largely unknown.
The present study was designed to evaluate the densities of CD11b+ MDSCs in both center of tumor (CT) and invasive margin (IM) regions by immunohistochemistry and assess their prognostic significance in a retrospective cohort of OSCC from a tertiary referral oral cancer center.
Material and methods
Patients and specimens
This study was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Research Ethic Committees of Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Nanjing Medical University. Informed consent was obtained from each patient or their guardians. Records of patients with primary OSCC who underwent ablative surgery at the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between April 2011 and December 2013 were reviewed. Patients enrolled here suffered from primary OSCC and were treatment-naive. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens from ablative resection of OSCC and detailed clinical, pathological as well as follow-up data were available for all eligible patients. Histopathological grading and clinical staging of each case were evaluated according to the WHO classification and American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System 7th edition, respectively [14].
Immunohistochemical staining of CD11b in OSCC
The FFPE specimens of all patients enrolled were collected for slide preparation. Immunohistochemical staining of CD11b was performed on 4-μm thickness sections as described previously [15]. Briefly, FFPE specimens were consecutively sliced into sections followed by deparaffinization in xylene and standard gradient ethanol. Subsequently, the slides were immersed in Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 8.0) for 15 min for antigen retrieval and incubated in 3% H2O2 for the blockage of endogenous peroxidase activity. The sections were further incubated with primary antibody (anti-CD11b, 1 : 200 dilution, CST, 49420) at 4°C overnight followed by phosphate-buffered saline washing and biotinylated secondary antibody incubation (Maxim, China). Finally, the antigen detection was conducted by a color reaction with 3.3-diaminobenzidinez (DAB) under microscopic monitoring and counterstained with hematoxylin. Negative controls without primary antibody incubation were included.
Evaluation of immunohistochemical staining
Images of selected areas were acquired using an upright microscope (Leica DM4000B, Germany), and the immunohistochemical staining results of CD11b+ MDSCs in OSCC samples were independently assessed by two senior oral pathologists without knowledge of patients’ clinicopathological data. When an agreement was difficult to reach, the final judgment was made by reevaluating the slides. For each tumor specimen, slides containing invasive margin (IM) and tumor center (CT) regions were selected. Five representative fields per slide including both of the regions were selected at 200×magnification after initial screening under a low power field (100×). As illustrated in Figure 1, similar to previous reports, the invasive margin (IM) was defined as a region of 500 μm width on each side of the border between malignant cells and tumor stroma, while the tumor center (CT) was defined as a region in the center of the tumor which was full of malignant cells and excluded the first 250 μm adjacent to the tumor border [16, 17]. The density of CD11b+ MDSCs in OSCC specimens was recorded independently at the CT and IM and presented as the mean number of positively stained cells per mm2, similar to our previous report [18–20]. As shown in Figure 2, cell counts of CD11b+ MDSCs were automatically quantified using ImageJ (version 2.0). The optimal cut-off values for the densities of CD11b+ MDSCs at the CT and IM were determined after analyzing the association between cell amount and overall survival (OS) by X-tile software with a minimum p-value approach (version 3.6.1, https://medicine.yale.edu/lab/rimm/research/software/). The X-tile program is a commonly used statistical tool for the assessment of biological relationships between a biomarker and outcome and identification of the optimal cut-point based on marker expression [21].
Statistical analysis
The X-tile program was applied to determine the optimal cut-off value of the CD11b+ MDSC density with the minimum p-value. Analysis of the association between classified densities of CD11b+ MDSCs at CT or IM and multiple clinicopathological parameters was conducted using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and comparison between groups was performed with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine the hazard ratio of different prognostic factors and the association between these factors with OS and DFS for OSCC. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of indicated prognostic factors were plotted and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to identify the predictive performance of each individual marker. All tests were two-sided, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 8.0, IBM SPSS 22.0 software and R 3.5.3.
Results
Epidemiological and clinicopathological characteristics of patients
One hundred and forty-four patients (76 males and 68 females) who were diagnosed with primary OSCC and underwent ablative surgery were included. They were aged from 30 to 82 years. The median follow-up duration was 45 months (ranging from 6 to 138 month). Sixty-nine patients died during the follow-up and 8 patients with local recurrence or cervical node metastasis remained alive until the last follow-up. Detailed epidemiological and clinicopathological characteristics of these patients enrolled are summarized in Table I.
Table I.
Variable | CD11b CT | CD11b IM | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
≥ 143.0 | < 143.0 | P-value* | ≥ 389.0 | < 389.0 | P-value* | ||
No. of patients | 54 | 90 | 89 | 55 | |||
Age [years] | ≤ 60 | 18 | 29 | 0.8905 | 24 | 23 | 0.0648 |
> 60 | 36 | 61 | 65 | 32 | |||
Gender | Male | 31 | 45 | 0.3887 | 49 | 27 | 0.4860 |
Female | 23 | 45 | 40 | 28 | |||
Smoking | No | 39 | 73 | 0.2142 | 69 | 42 | 0.8717 |
Yes | 15 | 17 | 20 | 13 | |||
Alcohol use | No | 45 | 77 | 0.7197 | 76 | 46 | 0.7759 |
Yes | 9 | 13 | 13 | 9 | |||
Tumor size | T1-T2 | 42 | 75 | 0.4083 | 73 | 44 | 0.7626 |
T3-T4 | 12 | 15 | 16 | 11 | |||
Pathological grade | I | 46 | 84 | 0.1101 | 78 | 52 | 0.2493 |
II–III | 8 | 6 | 11 | 3 | |||
Cervical node metastasis | N0 | 38 | 63 | 0.4741 | 60 | 41 | 0.3637 |
N+ | 16 | 27 | 29 | 14 | |||
Clinical stage | I–II | 28 | 56 | 0.2217 | 50 | 34 | 0.5049 |
III–IV | 26 | 34 | 39 | 21 |
All p-values in Table I were obtained using χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test.
MDSCs – myeloid derived suppressor cells, OSCC – oral squamous cell carcinoma, CT – tumor center, IM – invasive margin.
Associations between infiltrating CD11b+ MDSCs and clinicopathological features
Here, we employed immunochemical staining of CD11b, a common marker to label MDSCs in cancer, to characterize and quantify MDSCs in primary OSCC [7, 11, 12]. As shown in Figure 2, CD11b positive staining MDSCs was readily detected in CT and IM regions in OSCC samples. Following image capture and automatic cell counting by ImageJ, the densities of CD11b+ MDSCs in each tumor region (CT, IM) was calculated and recorded (Figure 2). Our results revealed that the densities of infiltrating MDSCs varied in CT (130.9 ±5.84 per mm2) and IM (466.2 ±15.28 per mm2), thus suggesting the significant enrichment of MDSCs in IM compartments. Additionally, no significant association between intensities of CD11b+ MDSCs in CT and IM was identified (data not shown). Then, to achieve outcome-based cut-off optimization, the “minimum p-value” approach was employed using X-tile software [21]. The optimal cutoff value for CD11b+ MDSC at the IM was 389.0 per mm2 (p = 0.0012) and 143.0 per mm2 at the CT (p = 0.00189) (Figure 3). Consequently, patients were classified into low or high CD11b+ MDSC subgroups. As summarized in Table I, we analyzed the associations between CD11b+ MDSC densities and several clinicopathological parameters, but failed to identify any significant associations.
Association between infiltrating CD11b+ MDSCs and survival in OSCC patients
To identify the possible associations between CD11b+ MDSCs and patient survival, we performed Kaplan-Meier analyses and found that increased densities of CD11b+ MDSCs in both CT and IM regions were significantly associated with shorter OS and DFS (Figures 4 A–D). Furthermore, we verified the prognostic values of these immunological features for OSCC by Cox regression analysis. As shown in Table II, the univariate analysis indicated that elevated densities of CD11b+ MDSCs at either the IM or CT were significantly associated with reduced OS (p = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively) and DFS (p = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, the multivariate Cox proportional regression analyses revealed that, besides pathological grade, densities of CD11b+ MDSCs in the IM or CT were independent prognostic factors for OS (HR = 3.183, 95% CI: 1.780–5.689, p < 0.001 at IM; HR = 2.012, 95% CI: 1.213–3.337, p = 0.007 at CT). Similar results were found in the DFS analysis, where estimated HR for CD11b+MDSCs in the IM was 2.762 (95% CI: 1.618–4.715) and at the CT was 1.919 (95% CI: 1.181–3.119).
Table II.
Variables | OS | DFS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR | 95% CI | P-value | HR | 95% CI | P-value | |
Univariate survival analyses: | ||||||
Age (> 60, ≤ 60) | 0.893 | 0.546–1.461 | 0.653 | 1.028 | 0.639–1.654 | 0.909 |
Gender (male, female) | 0.812 | 0.505–1.306 | 0.391 | 0.816 | 0.520–1.280 | 0.376 |
Smoking (yes, no) | 0.749 | 0.402–1.397 | 0.363 | 0.807 | 0.451–1.442 | 0.469 |
Alcohol use (yes, no) | 1.163 | 0.610–2.217 | 0.647 | 1.280 | 0.704–2.328 | 0.419 |
Tumor size (T3-T4, T1-T2) | 1.264 | 0.712–2.243 | 0.424 | 1.329 | 0.773–2.286 | 0.303 |
Pathological grade (II–III, I) | 1.942 | 0.958–3.938 | 0.066 | 2.496 | 1.338–4.658 | 0.004 |
Cervical node metastasis (N+, N0) | 0.993 | 0.583–1.692 | 0.981 | 1.086 | 0.658–1.793 | 0.746 |
Clinical stage (III–IV, I–II) | 1.217 | 0.749–1.978 | 0.427 | 1.395 | 0.879–2.215 | 0.158 |
CD11b CT (high, low) | 2.283 | 1.390–3.750 | 0.001 | 2.235 | 1.388–3.597 | 0.001 |
CD11b IM (high, low) | 3.285 | 1.850–5.835 | < 0.001 | 2.868 | 1.693–4.857 | <0.001 |
Multivariate survival analyses: | ||||||
Pathological grade (II–III, I) | 1.643 | 0.774–3.487 | 0.196 | 2.171 | (1.105–4.265) | 0.024 |
Cervical node metastasis (N+, N0) | 0.599 | 0.269–1.332 | 0.209 | 0.536 | (0.255–1.128) | 0.101 |
Clinical stage (III–IV, I–II) | 1.542 | 0.760–3.130 | 0.230 | 1.836 | (0.949–3.552) | 0.071 |
CD11b CT (high, low) | 2.012 | 1.213–3.337 | 0.007 | 1.919 | (1.181–3.119) | 0.009 |
CD11b IM (high, low) | 3.183 | 1.780–5.689 | < 0.001 | 2.762 | (1.618–4.715) | < 0.001 |
Numbers in bold indicate statistical significance with p-values less than 0.05. HR – hazard ratio, CI – confidence interval, OS – overall survival, DFS – disease-free survival, OSCC – oral squamous cell carcinoma, CT – tumor center, IM – invasive margin.
Predictive performance of CD11b+ MDSCs for OSCC prognosis
Next, we proceeded to determine the predictive performance of CD11b+ MDSCs for patients with OSCC by time-dependent ROC curve analysis. Tumor size, cervical nodal metastasis, pathological grade and clinical stage, widely adopted as prognostic factors for OSCC, were included for assessing the predictive value of CD11b+ MDSCs. With respect to the OS, the AUC values of CD11b IM at 1 year, 3 years and 5 years were 0.69, 0.58, 0.78 and the AUC values of CD11b CT were 0.72, 0.68, 0.75, respectively (Figurea 5 A, B). However, the AUC of the aforementioned four clinicopathological parameters was less than 0.54 (Figure 6).
Discussion
High mortality in OSCC necessitates development of effective biomarkers for treatment planning and prognostic prediction, ultimately improving patient management and long-term survival. The current commonly used TNM staging system fails to meet the clinical demand in accurate prognostic prediction [1]. Although various genetic or epigenetic biomarkers in OSCC have been proposed for prognostic assessment including microRNA, lncRNA and alternative mRNA splicing signature, they are still far from optimal [20, 22, 23]. In addition to these intrinsic features of cancer itself, tumor-infiltrating immunocytes have been established as key drivers underlying tumorigenesis as well as novel biomarkers with tremendous diagnostic and prognostic significance [4, 6]. Here, we determined the location and amount of MDSCs in OSCC and revealed that a high amount of CD11b+ MDSCs was associated with inferior survival and quantification of CD11b+ MDSCs might be a novel independent prognostic factor for OSCC.
Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that multiple types of immune cells infiltrate in the tumor itself or its microenvironment facilitate tumor overgrowth, invasion and metastasis [5]. In particular, MDSCs are a heterogeneous population of immature myeloid cells and utilize multiple mechanisms to establish a tumor-promoting environment [7, 11]. They can suppress T cells by depleting amino acids necessary for activation of T cells, inhibiting their migration and preventing their entry into lymph nodes or homing to tumor sites [24, 25]. Moreover, with respect to their indirect immunosuppressive mechanism, MDSCs altered the ability of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to activate T cells and T regulatory cells (Tregs) [26]. Besides immune regulatory mechanisms, MDSCs also influenced tumor progression by modulating the tumor microenvironment and promoting angiogenesis via VEGF, bFGF and MMP9 [27, 28]. Consistent with these previous findings, our data revealed that MDSCs were highly enriched in invasive tumor margins, thus suggesting that their tumor-promoting roles occurred primarily in the tumor microenvironment. However, much work is needed to accurately dissect the roles of MDSCs and relevant mechanisms of action during OSCC tumorigenesis.
Until now, the prognostic impacts of several subsets of tumor-infiltrating immune cells in a broad spectrum of human cancers including OSCC have been documented, such as CD3+ TIL, CD8+ TIL, CD45RO+ TIL and CD11b+ MDSCs [12, 18, 19, 29]. For example, we reported that high densities of CD3+/CD8+ TIL and CD68+ macrophage were significantly associated with increased overall and disease-specific survival in OSCC [19, 30]. In the present study, we assessed the prognostic value of the density of CD11b+ MDSCs in either CT or IM regions. Our results revealed that high densities of CD11b+ MDSCs were significantly associated with reduced patient survival. In addition, multivariate Cox regression assay also identified CD11b+ MDSCs as a novel independent prognostic factor affecting patient survival. These findings are in line with previous reports wherein MDSC accumulation correlated with poor outcome in melanoma, gastrointestinal cancers and bladder cancer [8–10, 31]. Moreover, MDSCs in non-small lung and cervical cancer patients were associated with advanced tumor stage and unfavorable prognosis and served as an independent prognostic factor predicting patients’ outcome [32, 33]. Here, we investigated the prognostic value of CD11b+ MDSCs in distinct locations (CT or IM) in OSCC with a relatively long-term follow-up. Our findings revealed that high densities of CD11b+ MDSCs in either the IM or CT compartment were significantly associated with unfavorable prognosis in OSCC and also served as independent prognostic factors in predicting patients’ survival. Previous studies mainly focused on MDSCs in whole tumor sections without discriminating different locations of infiltrating immunosuppressive cells in the tumor sample, which may partially explain the inconsistent results among various studies [10, 31–33]. Indeed, spatial distribution of immunoregulatory cells in different compartments such as the CT and IM might have diverse biological functions and their predictive value for clinical outcome may be region-specific [34]. Thus, we believe that our immunological evaluation of CD11b+ MDSCs by taking their distribution into account might be more accurate and powerful. In support of this, our time-dependent ROC curve analysis also revealed that the predictive performance of CD11b+ MDSCs in the IM or CT was superior to such prognostic factors as tumor size, cervical nodal metastasis and pathological grade.
Although our data revealed the prognostic values of CD11b+ MDSCs in IM or CT for OSCC patients, there are some limitations. Firstly, potential bias may remain due to the retrospective nature and limited sample size. Our findings need to be confirmed in a prospective study including a large, multicenter patient population. A single marker for MDSC labeling might not be adequate to evaluate their diverse subtypes as well as functional status. Combinations of two or more markers might be better and more accurate to dissect the clinical and biological significance of MDSCs during OSCC initiation and progression. In addition, some pathological factors such as depth of invasion, extracapsular extension or perineural invasion were not included in the prognostic analyses. Furthermore, whether CD11b+ MDSCs in IM or CT can be predictive for the response to various treatments as well as adverse events of adjuvant therapies in OSCC remains unknown.
In conclusion, our data indicated that high densities of CD11b+ MDSCs in the tumor center or invasive margins significantly correlated with unfavorable survival in patients with primary OSCC. Our findings also suggest that this infiltrating immune subset has pro-tumorigenic effects in OSCC which might be exploited for therapeutic intervention.
Acknowledgments
This work is financially supported, in whole or in part, by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81572669, 81602386, 81602378); Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20161564, BK20161024); A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (2018-87); Project from Nanjing Municipal Committee of Science and Technology (201803044).
Yue Jiang and Chenxing Wang contributed equally to this work.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Chi AC, Day TA, Neville BW. Oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: an update. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65: 401-21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.O’sullivan B, Brierley J, Byrd D, et al. The TNM classification of malignant tumours – towards common understanding and reasonable expectations. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 849-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Okuyemi OT, Piccirillo JF, Spitznagel E. TNM staging compared with a new clinicopathological model in predicting oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma survival. Head Neck 2014; 36: 1481-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gentles AJ, Newman AM, Liu CL, et al. The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers. Nat Med 2015; 21: 938-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gonzalez H, Hagerling C, Werb Z. Roles of the immune system in cancer: from tumor initiation to metastatic progression. Genes Dev 2018; 32: 1267-84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fridman WH, Pages F, Sautes-Fridman C, Galon J. The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome. Nat Rev Cancer 2012; 12: 298-306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gabrilovich DI. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Immunol Res 2017; 5: 3-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Weide B, Martens A, Zelba H, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells predict survival of patients with advanced melanoma: comparison with regulatory T cells and NY-ESO-1- or melan-A-specific T cells. Clin Cancer Res 2014; 20: 1601-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang L, Chang EW, Wong SC, Ong SM, Chong DQ, Ling KL. Increased myeloid-derived suppressor cells in gastric cancer correlate with cancer stage and plasma S100A8/A9 proinflammatory proteins. J Immunol 2013; 190: 794-804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yang G, Shen W, Zhang Y, et al. Accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) induced by low levels of IL-6 correlates with poor prognosis in bladder cancer. Oncotarget 2017; 8: 38378-88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Parker KH, Beury DW, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: critical cells driving immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment. Adv Cancer Res 2015; 128: 95-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ai L, Mu S, Wang Y, et al. Prognostic role of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2018; 18: 1220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Deng Y, Cheng J, Fu B, et al. Hepatic carcinoma-associated fibroblasts enhance immune suppression by facilitating the generation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Oncogene 2017; 36: 1090-101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (7th ed.). Springer, New York: 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li Z, Wang Y, Zhu Y, et al. The Hippo transducer TAZ promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell maintenance in oral cancer. Mol Oncol 2015; 9: 1091-105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Halama N, Michel S, Kloor M, et al. Localization and density of immune cells in the invasive margin of human colorectal cancer liver metastases are prognostic for response to chemotherapy. Cancer Res 2011; 71: 5670-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Galon J, Pages F, Marincola FM, et al. Cancer classification using the Immunoscore: a worldwide task force. J Transl Med 2012; 10: 205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhou C, Li J, Wu Y, Diao P, Yang J, Cheng J. High density of intratumor CD45RO(+) memory tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predicts favorable prognosis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 77: 536-45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhou C, Wu Y, Jiang L, et al. Density and location of CD3(+) and CD8(+) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes correlate with prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 2018; 47: 359-67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhou C, Diao P, Wu Y, et al. Development and validation of a seven-immune-feature-based prognostic score for oral squamous cell carcinoma after curative resection. Int J Cancer 2020; 146: 1152-63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 7252-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Han X, Xu Z, Tian G, et al. Suppression of the long non-coding RNA MALAT-1 impairs the growth and migration of human tongue squamous cell carcinoma SCC4 cells. Arch Med Sci 2019; 15: 992-1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang ST, Wu X, Diao PF, et al. Identification of a prognostic alternative splicing signature in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Cell Physiol 2020; 235: 4804-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fletcher M, Ramirez ME, Sierra RA, et al. l-Arginine depletion blunts antitumor T-cell responses by inducing myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Res 2015; 75: 275-83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hanson EM, Clements VK, Sinha P, Ilkovitch D, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells down-regulate L-selectin expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. J Immunol 2009; 183: 937-44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Serafini P, Mgebroff S, Noonan K, Borrello I. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells promote cross-tolerance in B-cell lymphoma by expanding regulatory T cells. Cancer Res 2008; 68: 5439-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tartour E, Pere H, Maillere B, et al. Angiogenesis and immunity: a bidirectional link potentially relevant for the monitoring of antiangiogenic therapy and the development of novel therapeutic combination with immunotherapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2011; 30: 83-95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shojaei F, Wu X, Qu X, et al. G-CSF-initiated myeloid cell mobilization and angiogenesis mediate tumor refractoriness to anti-VEGF therapy in mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 6742-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wolf GT, Chepeha DB, Bellile E, Nguyen A, Thomas D, Mchugh J. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and prognosis in oral cavity squamous carcinoma: a preliminary study. Oral Oncology 2015; 51: 90-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hu Y, He MY, Zhu LF, et al. Tumor-associated macrophages correlate with the clinicopathological features and poor outcomes via inducing epithelial to mesenchymal transition in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2016; 35: 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Singh MM, Johnson B, Venkatarayan A, et al. Preclinical activity of combined HDAC and KDM1A inhibition in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2015; 17: 1463-73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Vetsika EK, Koinis F, Gioulbasani M, et al. A circulating subpopulation of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells as an independent prognostic/predictive factor in untreated non-small lung cancer patients. J Immunol Res 2014; 2014: 659294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wu L, Liu H, Guo H, et al. Circulating and tumor-infiltrating myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cervical carcinoma patients. Oncol Lett 2018; 15: 9507-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pages F, Kirilovsky A, Mlecnik B, et al. In situ cytotoxic and memory T cells predict outcome in patients with early-stage colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 5944-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]