Abstract
The neurotransmitter serotonin plays a central role in animal behavior and physiology, and many of its functions are regulated via evolutionarily conserved biosynthesis and degradation pathways. Here we show that in Caenorhabditis elegans, serotonin is abundantly produced in nonneuronal tissues via phenylalanine hydroxylase, in addition to canonical biosynthesis via tryptophan hydroxylase in neurons. Combining CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing, comparative metabolomics and synthesis, we demonstrate that most serotonin in C. elegans is incorporated into N-acetylserotonin-derived glucosides, which are retained in the worm body and further modified via the carboxylesterase CEST-4. Expression patterns of CEST-4 suggest that serotonin or serotonin derivatives are transported between different tissues. Last, we show that bacterial indole production interacts with serotonin metabolism via CEST-4. Our results reveal a parallel pathway for serotonin biosynthesis in nonneuronal cell types and further indicate that serotonin-derived metabolites may serve distinct signaling functions and contribute to previously described serotonin-dependent phenotypes.
Biosynthesis and metabolism of the neurotransmitter serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT, 1) plays a central role in vertebrate and invertebrate biology, regulating food intake1,2, sleep3, anxiety4 and many other physiological processes5. In vertebrates, serotonin is primarily produced by neuroendocrine cells in the digestive tract (for example, the enterochromaffin cells) and serotonergic neurons of the central nervous system6. Its highly conserved biosynthetic pathway involves two steps; l-tryptophan (2) is hydroxylated by l-tryptophan-5-hydroxylase (TPH1 and TPH2 in humans)7, followed by decarboxylation of the resulting 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP, 3) by aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase (Fig. 1a). Serotonin and its metabolites mediate autocrine and paracrine as well as long-range signaling functions5. For example, serotonin produced by the enterochromaffin cells in the gut enters the general circulation where it regulates vascular tone and blood clotting8. In the brain, serotonin exchange between different cell types appears to mediate its mood- and anxiety-modulating effects9.
In mammals, serotonin is metabolized primarily to 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA, 4) in the liver and, to a lesser degree, acetylated by arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (AANAT) to form N-acetylserotonin (NAS, 5) in the pineal gland and retina10 (Fig. 1a). NAS is subsequently converted into melatonin (6) by hydroxyindole-O-methyltransferase. Like serotonin, NAS and melatonin have important signaling functions. In vertebrates, melatonin regulates circadian rhythm10, whereas NAS promotes neuronal progenitor cell proliferation in mice11.
The nematode C. elegans has been used extensively as an experimentally tractable system to explain conserved mechanisms of serotonin signaling2,12. In C. elegans, serotonin controls locomotion, pharyngeal pumping, egg laying and many other aspects of food-related behaviors and physiology13. Serotonin biosynthesis in C. elegans has been shown to proceed via hydroxylation of tryptophan by TPH-1 (ref.14), a close homolog of mammalian TPH1/2 and subsequent decarboxylation by aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (BAS-1, Fig. 1a)15. TPH-1 is believed to be required for tryptophan hydroxylation, therefore tph-1 loss-of-function mutants have been used extensively as a serotonin-deficient control2,12. However, tph-1 mutant worms appear to retain serotonin immunoreactivity16, and in some studies tph-1 mutants failed to show significant differences in pathogen avoidance compared to the wildtype (WT) animals, even though serotonin contributes to regulating the associated behaviors17,18. Moreover, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine and the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine, still induce egg-laying responses in tph-1 mutants, suggesting residual serotonin-dependent signaling19.
Recent analyses of the metabolomes of C. elegans and other nematode species have demonstrated that two of the three tyrosine (7)-derived monoamine neurotransmitters (8–10), tyramine (9) and octopamine (10), partake in previously unrecognized metabolic pathways20,21. For example, in osas#9 (11), a dispersal signal produced by starved C. elegans L1 larvae, octopamine is combined with succinate and an ascaroside (Fig. 1b). Similarly, tyramine is integrated into a large library of modular glucosides (MOGLs) that combine building blocks from all major primary metabolic pathways, for example tyglu#4 (12) and tyglu#6 (13)22,23.
We set out to investigate the origin and metabolic fate of serotonin in C. elegans using both chemical and genetic approaches. We first conducted a series of supplementation experiments with serotonin and NAS to uncover serotonin-derived metabolites and associated metabolic pathways. We then performed an unbiased comparative metabolomics investigation of C. elegans genetic mutants required for serotonin biosynthesis. Our analyses revealed a noncanonical pathway of serotonin biosynthesis via phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH-1) and led to the identification of a family of serotonin-incorporating MOGLs as the most abundant serotonin-derived metabolites in C. elegans.
Results
MOGLs are major serotonin metabolites
To investigate serotonin metabolism in C. elegans, we began by supplementing WT animals with a supraphysiological concentration of serotonin (5 mM), which is commonly used to study serotonin-dependent behaviors2,12,14. The endo-metabolomes (worm bodies) and exo-metabolomes (conditioned media) were separately extracted and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC–HRMS, Fig. 1c). These analyses revealed dramatic changes in the abundances of several hundred different metabolites in response to serotonin treatment (Fig. 1c). As most abundant serotonin-derived metabolites we identified NAS, N-succinyl serotonin (14) and 5-HIAA, in addition to smaller amounts of melatonin (Fig. 1d and Extended Data Fig. 1a,b). However, most of the metabolites affected by 5 mM serotonin treatment were not serotonin-derived; for example, we observed a stark increase in the abundance of a series of endocannabinoid derivatives (for example, 15), the recently described N-acyl-glycoglycerophosphoethanolamines (GLEAs)24, whereas production of diverse indole-derived MOGLs22 (16–27) was strongly suppressed (Fig. 1c,e,f and Extended Data Fig. 1c,d).
These dramatic changes in phospholipid and indole metabolism as well as the production of large quantities of N-succinyl serotonin, of which only trace amounts were detected in control animals, indicated that treatment with unphysiologically high concentrations of serotonin (for example, 5 mM, as commonly used2,12,14) may confound outcomes. To mitigate such metabolic perturbations, we used a stable isotope-labeling approach that would enable tracking downstream metabolites even when supplementing with low (micromolar) concentrations (Fig. 2a). For this purpose, we selected NAS, given that serotonin supplementation revealed NAS as the primary serotonin metabolite (Extended Data Fig. 1b), consistent with previous studies25. Furthermore, a stable isotope label could be easily integrated into NAS (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Comparative metabolomic analysis of WT animals treated with stable isotope-labeled NAS (13C-NAS, 28) or unlabeled NAS (12C-NAS) revealed four major downstream metabolites (Fig. 2b). Their tandem MS (MS/MS) fragmentation patterns suggested that they represent a series of MOGLs23,26, which we named sngl#1–4 (29–32, serotonin glucoside, Fig. 2c,d). The MS/MS fragmentation patterns further indicated that some of these putative serotonin-derived MOGLs incorporate phosphate and anthranilic acid moieties, similar to previously described MOGLs incorporating indole, iglu#1–4 (33–35, 16) (Fig. 2d). Because the MS data did not allow distinguishing between the large number of isomeric candidate structures that could be derived from these building blocks, we isolated a sample of sngl#2 (30) from WT animals treated with a high concentration of serotonin for further characterization via nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Analysis of the NMR spectra of isolated sngl#2 (Supplementary Fig. 2) confirmed the presence of a β-glucoside and indicated 3-O-phosphorylation, consistent with the structures of other phosphorylated MOGLs, for example, iglu#2 and iglu#4 (ref.27). In addition, the NMR spectra of sngl#2 suggested that the NAS moiety is attached via the phenolic hydroxy group instead of the indole nitrogen, in contrast to previously characterized MOGLs such as iglu#2.
To confirm these assignments, we first synthesized the α-O-, β-N- and β-O-linked isomers of NAS glucoside, 36, 37 and 29, respectively (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Fig. 3). Comparison of HPLC retention times on two different columns and MS/MS spectra indicated that sngl#1 corresponds to the β-O-linked isomer (29) (Extended Data Fig. 2a,b). In addition, careful inspection of the HPLC–HRMS data revealed a small amount of the β-N-linked isomer (sngl#101, 37) in both serotonin-fed and WT worms (Extended Data Fig. 2c–f). To establish the exact structures of the remaining three serotonin-derived MOGLs, sngl#2–4, we synthesized authentic samples using a recently developed strategy28 that uses α-d-fluoroglucose (38) for selective preparation of the O-linked NAS-glucoside (sngl#1), followed by a protection/deprotection sequence to install the phosphate at position 3 and then attach the anthranilic acid moiety at position 6 of the glucose (Fig. 2e). Comparison of HPLC retention times and MS/MS spectra of synthetic samples of sngl#2–4 confirmed their identity with the naturally occurring serotonin metabolites (Fig. 2e and Extended Data Fig. 2g–k). Identification of sngl#4 further allowed to propose the structure of a less abundant derivative, sngl#6 (39, Extended Data Fig. 2l). Next, we used authentic standards to quantify serotonin, NAS and sngl#1–4 levels in WT animals, which revealed that NAS-derived glucosides represent by far most abundant metabolites incorporating serotonin as a building block (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Fig. 4a–g). Notably, sngl#1–4 are retained in the worm body to a much greater extent than the other two abundant serotonin metabolites we detected, NAS and 5-HIAA, which are primarily excreted (Extended Data Fig. 2m), suggesting that serotonin-derived MOGLs may serve specific intraorganismal functions.
PAH-1 contributes to serotonin pools
We next measured abundances of free serotonin, NAS and sngl#1–4 in null mutants of genes of the established serotonin biosynthetic pathway (Fig. 1a). As expected, production of all serotonin derivatives was largely abolished in bas-1(ad446) null mutants, consistent with BAS-1 serving as the sole amino acid decarboxylase required for converting 5-HTP into serotonin (Fig. 3a and Extended Data Fig. 3a). However, production of serotonin, NAS and sngl#1–4 was not abolished in null mutants of the canonical tryptophan hydroxylase tph-1 (Fig. 3a and Extended Data Fig. 3b,c). This was unexpected, because TPH-1 is generally presumed to be required for serotonin biosynthesis in C. elegans14. Abundances of unmodified serotonin, NAS and sngl#1–2 were reduced by roughly 50–80% in two independent loss-of-function alleles, tph-1(mg280) and tph-1(n4622), relative to WT animals (Fig. 3a and Extended Data Fig. 3b,c). In contrast, abundances of sngl#3 and sngl#4 were WT-like in tph-1(n4622) mutants, while tph-1(mg280) mutants showed a roughly 50% reduction of sngl#4. These results indicated that, whereas BAS-1 is required for the biosynthesis of serotonin, TPH-1 is not the only enzyme catalyzing tryptophan hydroxylation, the rate-limiting step in serotonin biosynthesis in C. elegans14.
As candidates for other enzymes participating in serotonin biosynthesis, we considered PAH-1 and CAT-2 (tyrosine 3-hydroxylase), which are the other two iron- and tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4)-dependent aromatic amino acid hydroxylases in C. elegans13. Notably, previous studies demonstrated that recombinant PAH-1 can hydroxylate both phenylalanine (40) and tryptophan substrates in vitro29,30, and pah-1 homologs in Drosophila and mouse have been shown to contribute to serotonin biosynthesis30,31. In addition, CAT-2 has been reported to exhibit tryptophan hydroxylase activity32. To test whether PAH-1 and CAT-2 participate in tryptophan hydroxylation, we measured production of serotonin metabolites in tph-1(mg280) null mutants treated with cat-2 or pah-1 RNAi (Fig. 3b). We monitored sngl#2 and sngl#4, because these phosphorylated serotonin metabolites ionize well and thus offered the greatest dynamic range for detecting changes in serotonin metabolism via HPLC–HRMS at the smaller scale of RNAi experiments. We found that abundances of sngl#2 and sngl#4 were almost completely abolished by pah-1 RNAi in tph-1(mg280) animals, whereas cat-2 RNAi had no effect (Fig. 3b). In addition, we found that abundances of NAS and sngl#1–4 were significantly reduced in pah-1(syb3596) null mutants (Fig. 3a), to a similar extent as in tph-1(mg280) null mutants, but were largely unchanged in cat-2(e1112) null mutants (Extended Data Fig. 3d). These results indicated that PAH-1 contributes to 5-hydroxylation of tryptophan, in parallel with TPH-1 (Fig. 3c).
To further corroborate this hypothesis, we generated a pah-1(syb3596);tph-1(mg280) double null mutant using CRISPR–Cas9 genome engineering (Supplementary Fig. 5). Production of NAS and sngl#1–4 was completely abolished in the pah-1;tph-1 double null mutant, indicating that both pah-1 and tph-1 contribute to the production of the major serotonin-derived metabolites in C. elegans (Fig. 3a and Extended Data Fig. 3a). We also tested to what extent PAH-1 contributes to levels of free serotonin and other monoamine neurotransmitters. The susceptibility to oxidation and N-acetylation of free serotonin complicates its accurate detection and quantification in biological samples, especially in whole organism extracts. To measure serotonin levels, we therefore used a protocol that converts free serotonin into the more stable dansyl derivatives 41 and 42 that can be detected with high sensitivity by HPLC–HRMS33 (Extended Data Fig. 3e and Supplementary Fig. 6). We found that free serotonin was strongly reduced, although not fully abolished, in tph-1(mg280) mutant worms, whereas free serotonin levels in pah-1(syb3601) mutant worms were reduced to a lesser extent (Fig. 3a). Serotonin levels in pah-1(syb3596);tph-1(mg280) double mutant worms were on average lower than in tph-1(mg280) single mutants, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. In addition, abundances of the tyrosine-derived neurotransmitters, dopamine and tyramine13, were decreased in pah-1(syb3601) single and pah-1(syb3596);tph-1(mg280) double mutant worms, consistent with reduced tyrosine levels resulting from lack of phenylalanine hydroxylation in pah-1 knockout mutants (Extended Data Fig. 3f,g)29. Collectively, these results indicate that TPH-1 is the primary source of free serotonin, whereas TPH-1 and PAH-1 both contribute to the biosynthesis of the downstream serotonin metabolites NAS, sngl#1 and sngl#2. In turn biosynthesis of sngl#3 and sngl#4 is mostly PAH-1-dependent (Figs. 2f and 3a).
Previous immunofluorescence studies detected free serotonin in a subset of tph-1 expressing neurons in C. elegans, including NSM, ADF and HSN14. pah-1 expression has been detected in the epidermis, seam cell and tail, using immunofluorescence and fluorescent protein reporters34. To independently validate and further investigate pah-1 expression, we used CRISPR–Cas9 genome engineering to insert gfp:h2b at the N terminus of the pah-1 locus, separated by a T2A self-cleaving peptide (GFP∷H2B∷T2A∷PAH-1). This strategy results in separation of GFP∷H2B from PAH-1 during translation, and subsequent nuclear translocation of the fluorescent protein, but not PAH-1, allowing for easier identification of pah-1-expressing cells without interfering with protein function. We detected green fluorescent protein (GFP) fluorescence in epidermal cells, as previously reported, but also in two socket glia cells in the tail (Fig. 3d). Socket glia cell expression was confirmed by colocalization of GFP-H2B with the pan-glial microRNA mir-228 promoter, driving expression of a nuclear-localized red fluorescent protein (RFP) (mir-228p∷NLS-RFP, Fig. 3e), as well as with a phasmid socket glia-specific marker (grl-2p∷CFP, Supplementary Fig. 7a). Comparison of pah-1 expression in WT and tph-1(mg280) background revealed no overt differences, indicating that loss of tph-1 does not strongly perturb pah-1 expression patterns, as monitored via GFP∷H2B (Supplementary Fig. 7b).
A critical step in the production of serotonin is the decarboxylation of 5-HTP by BAS-1 (aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase in humans, Fig. 1a). However, to date, promoter-based fluorescent bas-1 transgenic reporter strains revealed bas-1 expression in monoaminergic neurons35, including serotonergic, tph-1-expressing neurons, but not in pah-1-expressing epidermal or tail glia cells. Thus, to determine whether pah-1-dependent serotonin biosynthesis occurs in a tph-1-like cell-autonomous fashion, which would depend on coexpression of bas-1, we generated an endogenous, C terminal SL2∷GFP∷H2B-tagged bas-1 reporter strain using CRISPR–Cas9. This endogenous reporter confirmed previously reported expression in all monoaminergic neurons, but further revealed robust expression of bas-1 in the epidermis and intestine (Fig. 4a). These findings establish coexpression of pah-1 and bas-1 in the epidermis, supporting the hypothesis that serotonin can be synthesized via PAH-1 cell autonomously in C. elegans. Alternatively, PAH-1-dependent serotonin could be produced cell-nonautonomously, for example, via tryptophan hydroxylation in glial cells followed by decarboxylation via BAS-1 in the intestine; however, given that 5-HTP could not be detected in either WT or bas-1 animals (Extended Data Fig. 3h,i) this scenario is perhaps less likely.
PAH-1 contributes to serotonin-related behaviors
To understand the role of pah-1-dependent serotonin production, we tested pah-1(syb3601) single and pah-1(syb3596);tph-1(mg280) double mutants for changes in previously reported serotonin-dependent behaviors. Using automated single worm tracking analysis36, we did not detect significant gross locomotory defects in pah-1(syb3601) mutant animals over a short 3-minute tracking period (Extended Data Fig. 4a,b). Moreover, loss of pah-1 in a tph-1(mg280) mutant background did not exacerbate changes in crawling amplitudes, foraging, body bends or backward motion of tph-1(mg280) mutant animals (Extended Data Fig. 4a,b). However, pah-1(syb3601) mutant animals displayed significantly increased exploratory behavior over 6- and 13.5-h time periods compared to WT, comparable to the increase in exploration of tph-1(mg280) mutants (Fig. 4b and Extended Data Fig. 4c). Thus, our results indicate that PAH-1-dependent serotonin production contributes to regulating exploratory behavior37. Given that most serotonin in C. elegans is rapidly metabolized, we then asked whether serotonin metabolites play a role for the observed exploratory behavior phenotype. To this end, we measured the effect of NAS supplementation on the exploratory behavior of bas-1(ad446) mutants, which are serotonin-deficient (Fig. 3a) and correspondingly show greatly increased exploratory behavior (Fig. 4b). We selected NAS for this supplementation experiment, because our initial supplementation study with stable isotope-labeled NAS showed that this compound is easily taken up by C. elegans and converted into the downstream metabolites sngl#1–4. NAS supplementation partially rescued the increased exploratory behavior of bas-1(ad446) mutants (Fig. 4c), whereas supplementation of WT animals had no significant effect (Extended Data Fig. 4d), indicating that NAS or the NAS-derived sngl’s contribute to regulating exploratory behavior.
Exposure to exogenous serotonin or to compounds that modulate serotonin signaling, such the SSRI fluoxetine or the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine, can induce egg laying in C. elegans, and this egg-laying response is attenuated in worms with reduced serotonin levels19. We confirmed that reduction of serotonin levels in tph-1(mg280) mutant animals results in a reduced, but not completely abolished egg-laying response to fluoxetine and imipramine (Fig. 4d,e). The remaining response of tph-1(mg280) mutant animals to SSRIs has been attributed to serotonin-independent mechanisms mediated via dopaminergic signaling31. However, we hypothesized that this remaining response could in part be due to TPH-1-independent serotonin production via PAH-1. Thus, we tested the effects of fluoxetine and imipramine on egg-laying behavior in pah-1(syb3601) and pah-1(syb3596);tph-1(mg280) mutant animals. While loss of PAH-1 did not affect the egg-laying response to fluoxetine, pah-1(syb3601) mutants displayed a significantly reduced egg-laying response to imipramine in 1-day-old adult hermaphrodites (Fig. 4d). Moreover, additional loss of pah-1 in a tph-1(mg280) mutant background exacerbated the egg-laying response to both fluoxetine and imipramine compared to tph-1(mg280) mutants in 2-day-old adults (Fig. 4e). Reduced induction of egg laying in pah-1(syb3601) and pah-1(syb3596);tph-1(mg280) mutants in response to SSRI treatment is consistent with decreased serotonin signaling in pah-1 mutant background. Taken together, our data demonstrate that PAH-1-dependent production of serotonin and/or serotonin-derived metabolites significantly contribute to two well-described functions of serotonin signaling, egg laying and exploratory behavior, in C. elegans.
Biosynthesis of serotonin-derived MOGLs
Next, we investigated the origin of the newly discovered serotonin metabolites, the MOGLs sngl#1–4. 13C-labeling of the NAS moiety in MOGLs in animals supplemented with 13C-labeled NAS (Fig. 2b) suggested that N-acetylation precedes O-glucosylation, likely by one of the more than 66 annotated UDP-glucuronosyltransferases in C. elegans38 (Fig. 5a). Subsequent attachment of the anthranilic acid moiety in sngl#3 and sngl#4 appeared to involve a member of the carboxylesterase (cest) family of α,β-hydrolases, which recently have been shown to mediate attachment of diverse moieties in MOGLs identified from C. elegans and C. briggsae22,23,39. For example, cest-4 is reported to be required for 6-O-attachment of anthranilic acid in two MOGLs, iglu#3 and iglu#4 (Fig. 2d)23, whereas cest-1.2 is responsible for the biosynthesis of more than 100 different 2-O-acylated MOGLs22.
Biosynthesis of all known CEST-derived MOGLs is abolished in mutants of glo-1 (refs.22,23), which encodes a Rab GTPase required for the formation of lysosome-related organelles; cellular compartments that are similar to mammalian melanosomes. Analysis of MS data for the exo- and endo-metabolomes of glo-1 mutants showed that biosynthesis of sngl#3 and sngl#4 was abolished, and sngl#2 significantly reduced in glo-1 mutants, whereas the amount of sngl#1 increased (Fig. 5b and Extended Data Fig. 5a). Next, we screened the metabolomes of 14 available cest knockout mutant strains for changes in the production of sngl#1–4. We found that sngl#3 and sngl#4 were absent in cest-4 mutants, whereas abundances of serotonin-derived MOGLs were not significantly changed in the other tested cest mutants (Extended Data Fig. 5b). We confirmed that that production of sngl#3 and sngl#4 was fully abolished in cest-4 mutant worms using larger cultures (Fig. 5c). In contrast, sngl#1 levels were largely unchanged and levels of sngl#2, representing a plausible biosynthetic precursor of sngl#3 and sngl#4, were greatly increased in cest-4 mutant animals compared to WT (Fig. 5c). These results indicate that CEST-4 is required for attachment of the anthranilate moiety to the 6-position of the glucose moieties in sngl#3 and sngl#4, consistent with its previously described role in the biosynthesis of iglu#3 and iglu#4 (Fig. 2d)23.
To determine the expression pattern of cest-4, we used CRISPR–Cas9 genome engineering to tag the cest-4 locus with gfp (cest-4∷SL2∷GFP∷H2B). We observed strong GFP:H2B fluorescence in the intestine, lower levels in head epidermal cells, as well as fluorescence in cells around the vulva and in the tail (Fig. 5d). Given that pah-1, bas-1 and cest-4 are all expressed in epidermal cells in the head, biosynthesis of sngl#3 and sngl#4 from PAH-1-derived serotonin could occur cell autonomously in these tissues, although it is unclear whether glo-1-dependent lysosome-related organelles exist in these cells. In contrast, we did not detect cest-4 expression in any neurons, including TPH-1-dependent serotonin-producing neurons (that is, NSM, ADF, HSN)14 (Fig. 5e). Thus, residual TPH-1-dependent production of sngl#3 and sngl#4 (Fig. 3a) in pah-1 mutants likely relies on uptake of neuronally produced serotonin, NAS, or sngl#1/2 by cest-4-expressing tissues (for example, intestine, epidermis).
Life stage and bacterial food affect serotonin metabolism
Previous studies showed that the abundances of MOGLs and other neurotransmitter-derived metabolites in C. elegans are strongly dependent on life stage and nutritional conditions20,22. Examples include the octopamine-derived ascaroside osas#9, a dispersal signal that is primarily produced by starved L1 larvae20 and cest-1.2-dependent MOGLs incorporating tyramine, which are particularly abundant in starved L3-stage larvae22. Comparing the metabolomes of fed and starved animals from the four larval stages and adults, we found that biosynthesis of sngl#1–4 is highly stage-specific and strongly increased under starvation. The cest-4-dependent sngl#3 and sngl#4 were nearly undetectable in the L1 and L2 stages and most abundant in L4 larvae and adults, whereas sngl#1 and sngl#2 were also abundant in starved L1 larvae22 (Fig. 5f). Levels of the most abundant serotonin glucoside, sngl#4, continued to increase through adulthood (Extended Data Fig. 5c,d).
Last, we asked whether microbial tryptophan degradation interacts with the biosynthesis of serotonin metabolites in C. elegans, based on our initial finding that supplementation with high concentrations of serotonin starkly affects biosynthesis of indole-derived MOGLs (Fig. 1f). The Escherichia coli strain OP50 commonly used as food for C. elegans produces large amounts of indole27, which is converted into the corresponding glucoside, iglu#1 and then elaborated into the MOGLs iglu#3 and iglu#4 via CEST-4, the same enzyme required for the biosynthesis of the serotonin metabolites sngl#3 and sngl#4, suggesting that serotonin and indole metabolism may interact. First, we confirmed that NAS and sngl#1–4 are not present in bacteria, via targeted HPLC–HRMS analysis of the OP50 metabolome (Extended Data Fig. 5e). Next, we tested whether bacterial indole affects production of serotonin-derived MOGLs. For this purpose, we compared the metabolomes of animals fed with mutant E. coli JW3686–7, harboring a disruption in the gene encoding tryptophanase (ΔtnaA), which is required for indole (43) production (Fig. 5g) and the corresponding indole-producing parent strain, E. coli BW25113 (ref.40). HPLC–HRMS analysis showed that abundances of the cest-4-dependent MOGLs iglu#3 and iglu#4 were greatly reduced in WT animals grown on ΔtnaA bacteria, as expected given the lack of bacterial indole (Extended Data Fig. 5f). In contrast, abundances of cest-4-dependent MOGLs incorporating serotonin (sngl#3 and sngl#4) were significantly increased in C. elegans fed with a ΔtnaA bacteria diet, whereas abundances of putative upstream precursors, NAS, sngl#1 and sngl#2 were reduced (Fig. 5g). Supplementation of worms grown on ΔtnaA bacteria with exogenous indole restored levels of NAS and sngl#1–4 to levels observed in worms fed the indole-producing parent strain (Fig. 5g and Extended Data Fig. 5f). These results indicate that bacteria-derived indole modulates C. elegans serotonin metabolism, and that, in the absence of indole-derived glucosides, CEST-4 primarily functions in the biosynthesis of the serotonin-derived sngl#3 and sngl#4 (Fig. 5h).
Discussion
Our results demonstrate that serotonin in C. elegans is produced via PAH-1, in addition to canonical hydroxylation of tryptophan via TPH-1. Further, we show that most TPH-1- and PAH-1 derived serotonin is converted into NAS and a new family of NAS-containing MOGLs, sngl#1–4 (Fig. 5h), which together are far more abundant than free serotonin (Fig. 2f). While the pah-1- and tph-1-dependent pathways are partially redundant and contribute similar amounts of NAS, sngl#1 and sngl#2, we find that most free serotonin is tph-1-derived, whereas pah-1 contributes more strongly to the further modified metabolites sngl#3 and sngl#4. This result indicates that PAH-1-derived serotonin is converted more rapidly into NAS and sngl#1–4 than TPH-1-derived serotonin. Given that pah-1, bas-1 and cest-4 are coexpressed in epidermal cells, PAH-1-dependent serotonin could be converted into sngl#3 and sngl#4 within this tissue. Conversely, because there is no overlap between tph-1- and cest-4-expressing cells, TPH-1-dependent sngl#3 and sngl#4 likely results from intercellular transport of serotonin, NAS or sngl#1/2.
In vertebrates, serotonin is produced via tissue-specific tryptophan hydroxylases, TPH1 and TPH2. TPH1 is primarily expressed in a variety of nonneuronal cells, such as the enterochromaffin cells of the gut and the pineal gland, whereas TPH2 is exclusively expressed in neurons in the central nervous system7. Human phenylalanine hydroxylase, PAH, has been shown to hydroxylate tryptophan in vitro, and a recent study reports that PAH contributes to serotonin biosynthesis in mice, suggesting that serotonin biosynthesis via PAH may be widely conserved30. We show that pah-1 and bas-1 expression overlap in the epidermis, consistent with a model in which pah-1-dependent serotonin is produced cell autonomously in this tissue. However, serotonin biosynthesis could also proceed cell-nonautonomously, for example via tryptophan hydroxylation by PAH-1 in glial cells followed by decarboxylation via BAS-1 in the intestine, paralleling vertebrate intestinal serotonin production. A potential role for glial cells in C. elegans serotonin production would be interesting given that in vertebrates, glia intimately interact with neurons to regulate neurotransmitter uptake, for example, serotonin, in the intestine41. The pah-1-expressing glial cells in C. elegans are similar to vertebrate glia and have been shown to affect neuronal development and function42,43; however, it is unknown whether glial cells regulate neurotransmitter levels.
Because most endogenously produced serotonin is detected as NAS and MOGLs, we hypothesize that serotonin-dependent phenotypes may be partially mediated by NAS or sngl#1–4. In mice, NAS has been suggested to have antidepressant44, neuroproliferative and neuroprotective44 functions. Functions of NAS in C. elegans are less well understood; however, the effect of NAS supplementation on exploratory behavior of bas-1 mutants suggests that NAS or NAS-derived sngl’s contribute to regulating serotonin-dependent behavioral phenotypes (Fig. 4c). In addition, loss of PAH-1 affects egg-laying responses to imipramine. These effects may be mediated by PAH-derived serotonin, although we cannot exclude a possible role of NAS, sngl#1–4 or other PAH-1-dependent metabolites, for example, dopamine and tyramine.
Given that glycosylation is often reversible45, serotonin-derived MOGLs could play a role in trafficking NAS or serotonin between tissues, similar to the proposed role of serotonin glucosides found in plants46. Notably, NAS and sngl#1–4 are chemically much less susceptible to oxidative degradation than serotonin, which quickly decomposes under biological conditions47. The finding that the carboxylesterase CEST-4 is specifically required for the biosynthesis of sngl#3 and sngl#4 further suggests that these MOGLs may function as secondary messengers of their own. Such new signaling roles of modular metabolites derived from neurotransmitters have been described previously. For example, osas#9 (Fig. 1b), a modular ascaroside integrating octopamine, is involved in interorganismal signaling, mediating dispersal of L1 larvae20. Like the serotonin derivatives sngl#3 and sngl#4, biosynthesis of osas#9 proceeds via a specific carboxylesterase, CEST-8 (ref.39). Similarly, CEST-1.2 is involved in the biosynthesis of a library of MOGLs integrating tyramine, for example tyglu#4 (Fig. 1b)22. In contrast to the pheromone osas#9, which is mostly excreted, the serotonin-derived MOGLs sngl#3 and sngl#4 are mostly retained in the worm body, suggesting intraorganismal functions.
Notably, glucosides derived from bacterial indole appear to compete with production of serotonin-derived MOGLs via CEST-4, suggesting that bacterial tryptophan degradation may interact with serotonin-related pathways in C. elegans. Similarly, production of NAS glucuronide48, a mammalian serotonin metabolite reminiscent of sngl#1, has been shown to be influenced by gut microbiota in mice49. These results strengthen the notion that microbiota interact with host neurotransmitter metabolism at multiple levels. Taken together, our study reveals unexpected complexity of serotonin biosynthesis and metabolism in C. elegans, providing a basis for further exploration of neurotransmitter signaling in this model system.
Methods
Nematode and bacterial strains
Unless indicated otherwise, worms were maintained on Nematode Growth Medium (NGM) 6 cm diameter Petri dish plates with E. coli OP50 (http://www.wormbook.org/methods). See Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 for C. elegans and E. coli strains used in this work.
Metabolite nomenclature
All newly detected metabolites for which a structure could be proposed were named using small molecule identifiers (SMIDs). SMIDs have been introduced as a search-compatible naming system for metabolites newly identified from C. elegans and other nematodes. The SMID database (www.smid-db.org) is an electronic resource maintained in collaboration with WormBase (www.wormbase.org). A complete list of SMIDs can be found at www.smid-db.org/browse.
Nematode cultures
Cultures were started by picking C. elegans onto 10 cm NGM plates (each seeded with 700 μl of OP50 E. coli grown to stationary phase in Lennox Broth). Plates were incubated at 22 °C until most of the food was consumed. Each plate was washed with 25 ml of S-complete media into a 125 ml Erlenmeyer flask, with 1 ml of OP50 E. coli added (E. coli cultures were grown to stationary phase in Lennox Broth, pelleted and resuspended as 1 g wet mass per 1 ml of M9 buffer), incubated at 180 r.p.m. and 22 °C for 60 h. Each liquid culture was transferred to a 50-ml centrifuge tube, added with 6 ml of bleach and 900 μl of 10 M NaOH, and the mixture was shaken for 3 min to prepare eggs. Eggs were centrifuged at 1,000g for 30 s, then the supernatant was removed and the egg pellet was washed with 25 ml of M9 buffer for three times and then suspended in a final volume of 5 ml of M9 buffer in a 15-ml centrifuge tube, which would be placed on a rocker and shaken overnight at 22 °C. Next, 100,000 hatched L1 were counted and seeded in 25 ml of S-complete media in a 125-ml Erlenmeyer flask, with 1 ml of OP50 E. coli added, incubated at 180 r.p.m. and 22 °C. After 70 h, cultures were centrifuged at 1,000g for 5 min, supernatant media were separated from the worm pellets, which were both snap frozen over liquid nitrogen and lyophilized. Three to seven biological replicates were grown for each strain.
Metabolite extraction
Lyophilized pellet samples were homogenized by shaking with 2.5 mm steel balls at 1,200 r.p.m. for 3 min in 30-s pulses, during which samples were cooled with liquid nitrogen (SPEX sample prep miniG 1600). Crushed pellets and media samples were added with 20 ml of methanol in 50-ml centrifuge tubes, vortexed vigorously for 30 s and then placed on a rocker and shaken overnight at 22 °C to extract metabolites. Extraction mixtures were centrifuged at 5,000g for 10 min at 4 °C, and supernatants were transferred into 20 ml scintillation vials and dried via an SC250EXP SpeedVac (Thermo Fisher Scientific) vacuum concentrator. Dried materials were resuspended in 500 μl of methanol, vortexed for 30 s and sonicated for 20 min. Suspensions were transferred into 1.7-ml Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 18,000g for 10 min at 4 °C. Then, 200 μl of extraction supernatant was transferred to HPLC vials and stored at −20 °C until analysis.
Nematode cultures with ΔtnaA bacteria
Here, 25,000 hatched L1 were counted and seeded in 5 ml of S-complete media in a 50 ml Erlenmeyer flask, with 1 ml of BW25113 (K12) E. coli or JW3686–7 (ΔtnaA) E. coli added (E. coli cultures were grown to stationary phase in Lennox Broth, pelleted and resuspended as 1 g wet mass per 1 ml of M9 buffer). The liquid cultures were supplemented with 2 μl of 1.25 M stock of indole in methanol to reach a final concentration of 0.5 mM and incubated at 180 r.p.m. and 20 °C. Control cultures were supplemented with 2 μl of methanol only. After 72 h, cultures were centrifuged at 1,000g for 5 min, supernatant media were separated from the worm pellets, which were both snap frozen over liquid nitrogen and lyophilized. Seven biological replicates were grown for each strain. Metabolite extraction was performed as in the ‘Metabolite extraction’ section, except for using one-fifth of the volumes of extraction solvents.
Serotonin feeding experiment
Here, 70,000 synchronized WT N2 L1 larvae were seeded in 125-ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 25 ml of S-complete media, with 1 ml of OP50 E. coli added, incubated at 180 r.p.m. and 22 °C for 24 h. The liquid cultures were supplemented with 2 μl of a 12.5 M solution of serotonin hydrochloride in methanol for a final concentration of 5 mM. Control cultures were supplemented with 2 μl of methanol. Worm cultures were incubated at 180 r.p.m. and 22 °C for another 46 h. Worm cultures were centrifuged at 1,000g for 5 min, and supernatant media were separated from the worm pellets, which were both snap frozen over liquid nitrogen and lyophilized. Dried samples were extracted as above.
13C-NAS isotope tracing experiment
Here, 70,000 synchronized WT N2 L1 larvae were seeded in 125-ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 25 ml of S-complete media, with 1 ml of OP50 E. coli added, incubated at 180 r.p.m. and 22 °C for 24 h. The liquid cultures were supplemented with 2 μl of a 12.5 mM solution of either NAS in methanol or 13C-NAS in methanol, for a final concentration of 5 μM. Control cultures were supplemented with 2 μl of methanol. Worm cultures were incubated at 180 r.p.m. and 22 °C for another 46 h. Worm cultures were centrifuged at 1,000g for 5 min, supernatant media were separated from the worm pellets, which were both snap frozen over liquid nitrogen and lyophilized. Dried samples were extracted as above.
Preparation of endo-metabolome samples from staged starved and fed C. elegans
Samples were prepared following a previously reported procedure22. Then 40,000 synchronized L1 larvae were added to 125 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 30 ml of S-complete medium. Worms were fed with 4 ml of concentrated OP50 and incubated at 20 °C with shaking at 160 r.p.m. for: 12 h (L1), 24 h (L2), 32 h (L3), 40 h (L4) and 58 h (gravid adults). For preparation of starved samples, each of the larval and adult stages was starved for 24 h after reaching their desired developmental stage in S-complete media without OP50. After incubation for the desired time, liquid cultures were centrifuged (1,000g, 22 °C, 1 min) and supernatants were collected. Intact OP50 were removed from the supernatant by centrifuging (3,000g, 22 °C, 5 min), and the resulting supernatants (containing the exo-metabolomes) were lyophilized. Lyophilized samples were homogenized with a dounce homogenizer in 10 ml of methanol and extracted on a stirring plate (22 °C, 12 h). The resulting suspension was centrifuged (4,000g, 22 °C, 5 min) to remove any precipitate and then carefully transferred to HPLC vials. Three biological replicates were started on different days.
Preparation of endo-metabolome samples from C. elegans at different adult ages
For all adult samples, 90,000 synchronized L1 animals of WT C. elegans were seeded in 125 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 25 ml of S-somplete media with added E. coli OP50 and incubated at 20 °C, 180 r.p.m. Day 1 adult animals were extracted 72 h after initial seeding. Worm cultures were centrifuged at 1,000g, room temperature for 1 min, then one-third of the pellet (approximately 30,000 animals) were frozen on dry ice and stored at −20 °C until further process. The remaining two-thirds of worm culture was placed back in liquid culture. Day 5 and day 7 animals (30,000 animals each, half of the pellet) were harvested similarly to day 1 animals. To avoid larval contamination due to egg laying, larvae were removed daily. For this purpose, cultures were centrifuged at 1,000g and 20 °C for 1 min. The supernatant was removed, and the pellet was washed with M9 media until clear of larvae. The pellet was placed back in S-complete supplemented with fresh E. coli OP50. Worm samples were collected and extracted as above. Samples were dissolved in 75 μl of methanol for MS analysis. Three biological replicates were started on different days.
Mass spectrometric analysis
High-resolution LC–MS analysis was carried out on a Thermo Fisher Scientific Vanquish Horizon ultra-HPLC (UHPLC) System coupled with a Thermo Q Exactive hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometer equipped with a heated electrospray ionization (ESI) ion source, using Thermo Scientific Xcalibur (v.4.3.73.11). Next, 1 μl of extract was injected and separated using a water-acetonitrile gradient on a Thermo Scientific Hypersil GOLD C18 column (150 × 2.1 mm, 1.9 μm particle size, 175 Å pore size, Thermo Scientific) and maintained at 40 °C unless otherwise stated. Solvents were all purchased from Fisher Scientific as Optima grade. Mass spectrometer parameters: 3.5 kV spray voltage, 380 °C capillary temperature, 300 °C probe heater temperature, 60 sheath flow rate, 20 auxiliary flow rate, 2.0 spare gas; S-lens radio frequency level 50.0, resolution 240,000, m/z range 150–1,000, AGC target 3 × 106. Instrument was calibrated with positive and negative ion calibration solutions (Thermo Fisher) Pierce LTQ Velos ESI+ and ESI− calibration solutions. Peak areas were determined using Xcalibur 4.1 QualBrowser (v.4.1.31.9, Thermo Scientific) using a 5 ppm window around the m/z of interest. MS Excel (v.2112) and Graphpad PRISM (v.8.4.0) were used to plot and perform statistical analysis. HPLC–MS peak areas were normalized to the measured abundance of ascr#3 (https://smid-db.org/detail/ascr#3/), in each sample for all graphs in this study, except for the measurement of neurotransmitters via derivatization. For quantitative analyses, compound loss during sample processing (below) and ion suppression in the worm metabolome matrix was taken into account. For measurement of NAS (5), the peaks for the sodium adduct at m/z 241.0947 in ESI+ mode were used, because of interference of coeluting metabolites that have the same m/z 219.1128 as the proton adduct. For analysis with the Hypersil GOLD C18 column (for hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) conditions, see further below), two different methods were used, as follows:
28-minute mass spectrometric analysis method: Solvent A was 0.1% formic acid in water and solvent B was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. A/B gradient started at 1% B for 3 min, then from 1% to 100% B over 20 min, 100% for 5 min, then down to 1% B for 3 min.
73-minute mass spectrometric analysis method: Solvent A was 0.1% formic acid in water and solvent B was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. A/B gradient started at 1% B for 3 min, then from 1% to 100% B over 20 min, 100% for 5 min, then down to 1% B for 3 min.
Feature detection and characterization
LC–MS RAW files from each sample were converted to mzXML (centroid mode) using MSConvert (ProteoWizard, v.3.0.18250–994311be0), followed by analysis using the XCMS analysis feature in METABOseek (metaboseek.com, v.0.9.7)24. Peak detection was carried out with the centWave algorithm, values set as: 4 ppm, 320 peakwidth, 3 snthresh, 3,100 prefilter, FALSE fitgauss, 1 integrate, TRUE firstBaselineCheck, 0 noise, wMean mzCenterFun, −0.005 mzdiff. XCMS feature grouping values were set as: 0.2 minfrac, 2 bw, 0.002 mzwid, 500 max, 1 minsamp, FALSE usegroup. METABOseek peak filling values set as: 5 ppm_m, 5 rtw, TRUE rtrange. Resulting tables were then processed with the METABOseek Data Explorer. Molecular features were filtered for each particular null mutant against all other mutants. Filter values were set as: 10 to maximum minFoldOverCtrl, 15,000 to maximum meanInt, 120 to 1,500 rt, 0.95 to maximum Peak Quality as calculated by METABO-seek. Features were then manually curated by removing isotopic and adducted redundancies. Remaining masses were put on the inclusion list for MS/MS (ddMS/MS) characterization. Positive and negative mode data were processed separately. In both cases we checked if a feature had a corresponding peak in the opposite ionization mode, since fragmentation spectra in different modes often provide complementary structural information. To acquire MS/MS spectra, we applied method on a Thermo Q Exactive-HF mass spectrometer with MS1 resolution 60,000, AGC target 1 × 106, maximum injection time 50 ms, MS/MS resolution 45,000, AGC target 5 × 105, maximum injection time 80 ms, isolation window 1.0 m/z, stepped normalized collision energy 10, 30, dynamic exclusion 3 s.
HILIC-MS analysis of sngl#1 and sngl#3 using a HILIC column
Analyses were performed using the instrumentation described in the Mass spectrometric analysis section. Then, 1 μl of synthetic samples or metabolome extract were separated using a water-acetonitrile gradient on an Agilent Zorbax Hilic Plus column (150 × 2.1 mm, particle size 1.8 μm) maintained at 40 °C with a flow rate of 0.3 ml min−1. Solvent A was 0.1% formic acid in water and solvent B was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. Analytes were separated using a gradient profile as follows: 2 min (95% B) → 20 min (50% B) → 20 min (50% B) lvent A, 0.1% formic acid in water; solvent B, 0.1% samples was analyzed in ESI+ mode, m/z range 100 to 700.
HPLC–MS analysis of sngl#2 and sngl#4 using an amide HILIC column
Analyses were performed using the instrumentation described in the Mass spectrometric analysis section. Then 1 μl of synthetic sample or metabolome extract were separated using a water-acetonitrile gradient on a Waters Xbridge Amide column (150 × 2.1 mm, particle size 3.5 μm) maintained at 40 °C. Solvent A was 0.1% ammonium formate in 90% acetonitrile-10% water and solvent B was 0.1% ammonium formate in 30% acetonitrile and 70% water. Analytes were separated using a gradient profile as follows: started at 1% B for 3 min, linearly increasing to 25% B over 17 min, 100% B over 3 min, holding at 100% B for 4.9 min, then down to 1% B in 0.1 min and holding at 1% B for 2 min. Samples were analyzed in ESI− mode, m/z range 70 to 1,000.
sngl#2 isolation and characterization
Here, 300,000 synchronized WT (N2) L1 larvae were seeded in a 500-ml Erlenmeyer flask containing 100 ml of S-complete media, with 1 ml of OP50 E. coli added, and incubated at 180 r.p.m. and 22 °C for 72 h. The liquid culture was transferred into a 2-l Erlenmeyer flask containing 400 ml of S-complete media, with 10 ml of OP50 E. coli and 53 mg of serotonin hydrochloride added, resulting in a final concentration 0.5 mM of serotonin in the liquid culture. After incubated at 180 r.p.m. and 22 °C for 70 h, the culture was centrifuged at 1,000g for 5 min, and the worm pellets were separated from the supernatant media and lyophilized to dryness. Dried worm pellet samples were ground and extracted as above. After extraction using methanol overnight, extraction mixtures were centrifuged at 5,000g for 10 min at 4 °C. Extracts were combined into a 500-ml round bottom flask, 2.1 g of celite was added and the resulting suspension was concentrated to dryness in vacuo, resulting in a beige powder representing worm exo-metabolome absorbed on celite. This sample was fractionated using C18 reversed-phase flash chromatography using a gradient of 0–100% ACN in H2O with 0.1% formic acid. Fractions were checked by HPLC–MS for the presence of sngl#2, and sngl#2-containing fractions were combined and concentrated to dryness in vacuo. The residue was further fractionated on a Thermo Fisher Scientific Vanquish Horizon UHPLC System coupled with a Thermo Q Exactive hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometer equipped with a heated ESI ion source, using a Phenomenex Luna C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle diameter, 100 Å pore size) using a 0.1% aqueous formic acid-acetonitrile solvent gradient at a flow rate of 4.0 ml min−1; solvent A was 0.1% formic acid in water and solvent B was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. The gradient started at 1% B for 13.83 min, then from 1 to 50% B over 140 min, then from 50 to 98% B over 0.5 min, holding at 98% for 18 min, then back down to 1% B in 1 min, holding for 9 min. Fractions containing sngl#2 were concentrated in vacuo, and the residue was subjected to NMR spectroscopic analysis (CD3OD, Bruker AVANCE III HD, 800 MHz).
Recovery experiment for quantitation of serotonin-derived metabolites
Batches of 70,000 synchronized L1 of pah-1(syb3596);tph-1(mg280) animals were counted and seeded in 25 ml of S-complete media in a 125 ml Erlenmeyer flask, with 1 ml of OP50 E. coli added, and incubated at 180 r.p.m. and 22 °C. After 70 h, cultures were centrifuged at 1,000g for 5 min, supernatant media were separated from the worm pellets. Then 50 μl of 10 μM stock solution of synthetic NAS, sngl#1, sngl#2, sngl#3 and sngl#4 in methanol were added to pellet samples, which were then snap frozen over liquid nitrogen, lyophilized, extracted and analyzed by HPLC–HRMS in the same manner as described above, which, assuming 100% recovery, would result in metabolome extract containing the added synthetic compounds at a concentration of 1 μM. Percentage recovery was assessed based on comparison of MS peak intensities of this sample to a control sample of unsupplemented pah-1(syb3596);tph-1(mg280) extract, to which, immediately before MS analysis, the same set of synthetic serotonin metabolites were added to reach a concentration of 1 μM. Ion suppression due to the matrix of coeluting worm metabolites was assessed separately by comparing MS peak intensities obtained for a 1 μM solution of synthetic serotonin metabolites (without added worm metabolome) with peak intensities obtained for the sample of unsupplemented pah-1(syb3596);tph-1(mg280) extract, to which, immediately before MS analysis, synthetic serotonin metabolites were added to reach a concentration of 1 μM. Quantitative data for the abundances of serotonin metabolites (Fig. 2f) were calculated taking into account average percentage recovery and ion suppression (Supplementary Fig. 4a,b).
Derivatization for serotonin detection
Here, 100,000 synchronized L1 larvae were seeded in 125-ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 25 ml of S-complete media, with 1 ml of of OP50 E. coli added, and incubated at 180 r.p.m. and 22 °C. After 70 h, cultures were centrifuged at 1,000g for 5 min and supernatant media were discarded. Worm pellets were washed three times with 1× PBS, then transferred to 2.5-ml Eppendorf tubes and washed with 0.1× PBS, snap frozen over liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until further sample preparation. Four to eight biological replicates were grown for each strain. Control samples were prepared by adding 20 μl of 1 mg ml−1 serotonin hydrochloride methanol stock to serotonin-deficient pah-1(syb3596);tph-1(mg280) worm pellet samples (to assess percent recovery, as described above for serotonin metabolites) or 200 μl of 1× PBS buffer (to assess the effect of additional ion suppression due to worm metabolome background) before snap freezing. Worm pellets were lyophilized to dryness, then homogenized by shaking with 2.5 mm steel balls at 1,200g for 3 min in 90 s pulses, during which samples were cooled with liquid nitrogen (SPEX sample prep miniG 1600). Carbonate buffer (Na2CO3/NaHCO3, 100 mM, pH 12, adjusted using 10 mM NaOH) and 14.8 mM dansyl chloride solution (in acetone, prepared and stored in the dark) were freshly prepared. To each pellet sample was added 150 μl of carbonate buffer, the pH was adjusted with 1 M NaOH until the mixture reached pH 12 and 150 μl of dansyl chloride solution was added. Mixtures were vortexed vigorously for 30 s and incubated in a water bath at 60 °C. After 15 min, to each tube was added 5 μl of 15% formic acid to adjust pH to 7, and the samples were centrifuged at 15,000g for 5 min at 4 °C. Reaction mixtures were transferred to HPLC vials and lyophilized. Dried samples were resuspended in 80 μl of methanol and ethyl acetate (1:1 v/v), vortexed for 30 s and sonicated for 15 min. Samples were transferred to appropriated HPLC inserts and centrifuged at 2,000g for 1 min. Supernatants were transferred to new HPLC vials and analyzed on the same day. Next, 3 μl of extract was injected and separated using a water-acetonitrile gradient on a Thermo Scientific Hypersil GOLD C18 column. Mass spectrometric analysis was conducted using the 28-min HPLC method described above. Both mono- and di-dansyl derivatized serotonin were quantified in each sample.
RNAi experiments
Bacteria expressing cat-2, tph-1, pah-1 dsRNA (Ahringer library) and control vector (L4440) was grown on LB/carbenicillin (50 μg ml−1)/tetracycline (50 μg ml−1) agar plates at 37 °C overnight. A single colony of bacteria was inoculated in LB/ampicillin (50 μg ml−1) liquid media and grown for 8–10 h. RNAi plates were prepared by supplementing NGM plates with IPTG (1 mM)/ampicillin (50 μg ml−1) and 500 μl of the previously grown RNAi bacteria was added to each plate. Seeded plates were dried at room temperature for 24 h. L4 animals (P0) were placed onto RNAi plates (control (L4440) and treatment (cat-2, tph-1, pah-1)) and kept at 20 °C. Ten L4 F1 worms were transferred to fresh 10 cm RNAi plates (five plates for each treatment), and worms were grown for 4–5 days until obtaining a mixed population of F2 worms. Each set of five plates was washed twice with 6 ml of M9 buffer, and the plate washes were centrifuged, the supernatants discarded and the worm pellets washed twice with M9 twice and then frozen at −80 °C. Three biological replicates were grown for each condition. To the lyophilized pellet samples was added 1 ml of methanol, and the samples were homogenized by sonication (2 s pulse, 2 s off) for 3 min. Samples were placed on a rocker and shaken for 1 h and then centrifuged at 10,000g for 10 minutes at 4 °C. The supernatants were transferred into 4-ml scintillation vials. Another 1 ml of methanol was added and the extraction procedure was repeated. Combined extractions were dried using an SC250EXP SpeedVac (Thermo Fisher Scientific) vacuum concentrator. Dried materials were resuspended in 100 μl of methanol, vortexed for 30 s and sonicated for 20 min. Suspensions were transferred into 1.7-ml Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 18,000g for 10 min at 4 °C. Then 100 μl of extraction supernatant was transferred to HPLC vials, evaporated again and resuspended in 20 μl of methanol for further concentration. Metabolite extract samples were stored at −20 °C until HPLC–MS analysis.
PCR with reverse transcription
Samples of around 500 worms from each RNAi treatment were collected and frozen. Total RNA was extracted and purified using Trizol and RNA Clean & Concentrator-5 kit (ZYMO Research). Complementary DNA was synthetized using the SuperScript III First-Strand kit (Invitrogen). Quantitative PCR was performed using SYBR green dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on a BIO-RAD C1000 Thermal Cycler. Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method with ama-1 as a house keeping gene50. Two technical replicates were performed for each strain and treatment, per biological replicate. See Supplementary Table 3 for primer sequences.
Microscopy
One-day old hermaphrodites were anesthetized using 25 mM sodium azide and mounted on 5% agarose pads on glass slides. Images were acquired at ×40 using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 880) and processed using ImageJ software51. For each strain, representative maximum projections are shown.
Egg-laying assay
Egg-laying assays performed in this study were based on previously described assays19. Briefly, individual 1- or 2-day old adults were each transferred into a 96-well microtiter plate containing 100 μl of solution. Number of eggs released per animal were scored after 120 min at room temperature. Concentration of drugs in M9 buffer were as follows: 0.5 mg ml−1 fluoxetine hydrochloride and 0.75 mg ml−1 imipramine hydrochloride52. Controls in M9 buffer alone were performed on each strain every time. Each assay tested eight animals/strain/treatment and was repeated three independent times. Animals injured during transfer were excluded from analysis.
Locomotory behavior
Automated single worm tracking was performed using the Worm Tracker v.2.0 system36 at room temperature. One-day old, fed adult hermaphrodites were recorded for 3 min on an NGM plate fully coated with a thin layer of OP50. Data were collected on three independent days. All strains were recorded on each experimental day. Data were combined and analyzed using the Worm Tracker v.2.0 software (https://www.yeminilab.com/behavior). In addition to statistical testing performed by Worm Tracker v.2.0 software, significant features against WT N2 (q value(Wilcoxon) ≤ 0.05) were further corrected for multiple comparisons using one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test.
Exploratory behavior assay
To measure exploratory behavior, we used a previously described assay setup37. Briefly, 35 mm NGM plates were fully covered with OP50 and allowed to dry to for 2–3 days. One young L4 animal was transferred to each plate. After either 6 or 13.5 h, the worms were removed from the plates and the plates were superimposed on a grid containing 3.5 mm squares, and the number of squares entered (maximum 88) by each worm was manually counted. All worms were incubated at 20 °C. For each assay, 20 animals per group and two replicates were analyzed. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s.
Exploratory behavior assay with NAS supplementation
We used the same assay setup as above, with the following modifications. 400 μM and 40 mM NAS stock solutions were freshly prepared using DMSO/H2O (v/v = 1:1). 35 mm NGM plates were covered with 100 μl of NAS stock solution and allowed to diffuse overnight into the whole plate. Control plates were covered with 100 μl DMSO/H2O solution (v/v = 1:1). Then plates were fully covered with OP50 and allowed to dry overnight. One young L4 bas-1(ad446) animal was transferred to each plate and incubated at 20 °C. After 13.5 h, the worm was removed and the plates were superimposed on a grid containing 4.0 mm squares, and the number of squares entered (maximum 72) by each worm was manually counted. For each assay 10–12 animals per group were analyzed, for each of the three independent replicates. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s.
Statistical analysis
HPLC–MS peak areas were normalized to the measured abundance of ascr#3 (https://smid-db.org/detail/ascr#3/), in each sample for all graphs in this study, except for the measurement of neurotransmitters via derivatization. Peak integration data from HPLC–MS analysis were then normalized to WT (N2) average from each batch, and log-transformed before statistical analysis. Significance of differences between peak areas were assessed using unpaired, two-tailed t-tests, except for data presented in Fig. 4b–e and Extended Data Fig. 4, which were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test.
Extended Data
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This research was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (grant nos. R35GM131877 to F.C.S. and T32GM008500 to B.J.C.) and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Some strains used in this work were provided by the CGC, which is funded by the National Institutes of Health Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (grant no. P40 OD010440). We thank G. Horvath for technical support and D. Kiemle for assistance with NMR spectroscopy.
Footnotes
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Research reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-022-01148-7.
Code availability
Metaboseek is available as an R package, with installation instructions for Windows, macOS, and Linux. A preconfigured R-portable installation is available as installer or.zip file for Windows. Source code, documentation and a tutorial vignette are available at https://github.com/mjhelf/Metaboseek and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3360087. Individual functions for spectra comparison, merging spectra and filtering molecular formulae have been moved to the companion R package MassTools, with source code and documentation available at https://github.com/mjhelf/MassTools and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5725620. The Metaboseek tutorial is also available at https://metaboseek.com/doc.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Extended data is available for this paper at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-022-01148-7.
Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-022-01148-7.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
Source data are provided with this paper. The HPLC–HRMS and MS/ MS data generated during this study have been deposited at MassIVE (gnps.ucsd.edu) under accession code MSV000088750 (https://doi.org/10.25345/C55W01). Source data are provided with this paper.
References
- 1.Greer ER, Perez CL, Van Gilst MR, Lee BH & Ashrafi K Neural and molecular dissection of a C. elegans sensory circuit that regulates fat and feeding. Cell Metab. 8, 118–131 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Srinivasan S et al. Serotonin regulates C-elegans fat and feeding through independent molecular mechanisms. Cell Metab. 7, 533–544 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Monti JM Serotonin control of sleep-wake behavior. Sleep. Med Rev 15, 269–281 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gross C et al. Serotonin(1A) receptor acts during development to establish normal anxiety-like behaviour in the adult. Nature 416, 396–400 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Amireault P, Sibon D & Cote F Life without peripheral serotonin: insights from tryptophan hydroxylase 1 knockout mice reveal the existence of paracrine/autocrine serotonergic networks. ACS Chem. Neurosci 4, 64–71 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gershon MD & Tack J The serotonin signaling system: from basic understanding to drug development for functional GI disorders. Gastroenterology 132, 397–414 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Walther DJ et al. Synthesis of serotonin by a second tryptophan hydroxylase isoform. Science 299, 76 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mercado CP et al. A serotonin-induced N-glycan switch regulates platelet aggregation. Sci. Rep 3, 2795 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meneses A & Liy-Salmeron G Serotonin and emotion, learning and memory. Rev. Neurosci 23, 543–553 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Iuvone PM et al. Circadian clocks, clock networks, arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase, and melatonin in the retina. Prog. Retin. Eye Res 24, 433–456 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sompol P et al. N-acetylserotonin promotes hippocampal neuroprogenitor cell proliferation in sleep-deprived mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 8844–8849 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Noble T, Stieglitz J & Srinivasan S An integrated serotonin and octopamine neuronal circuit directs the release of an endocrine signal to control C. elegans body fat. Cell Metab. 18, 672–684 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chase DL & Koelle MR in WormBook (ed. The C. elegans Research Community) 10.1895/wormbook.1.132.1 (wormbook.org, 2007). [DOI]
- 14.Sze JY, Victor M, Loer C, Shi Y & Ruvkun G Food and metabolic signalling defects in a Caenorhabditis elegans serotonin-synthesis mutant. Nature 403, 560–564 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Loer CM & Kenyon CJ Serotonin-deficient mutants and male mating behavior in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci 13, 5407–5417 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Niacaris T & Avery L Serotonin regulates repolarization of the C. elegans pharyngeal muscle. J. Exp. Biol 206, 223–231 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang Y, Lu H & Bargmann CI Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 438, 179–184 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Singh J & Aballay A Microbial colonization activates an immune fight-and-flight response via neuroendocrine signaling. Dev. Cell 49, 89–99.e4 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dempsey CM, Mackenzie SM, Gargus A, Blanco G & Sze JY Serotonin (5HT), fluoxetine, imipramine and dopamine target distinct 5HT receptor signaling to modulate Caenorhabditis elegans egg-laying behavior. Genetics 169, 1425–1436 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Artyukhin AB et al. Succinylated octopamine ascarosides and a new pathway of biogenic amine metabolism in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Biol. Chem 288, 18778–18783 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.O’Donnell MP, Fox BW, Chao PH, Schroeder FC & Sengupta P A neurotransmitter produced by gut bacteria modulates host sensory behaviour. Nature 583, 415–420 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wrobel CJJ et al. Combinatorial assembly of modular glucosides via carboxylesterases regulates C. elegans starvation survival. J. Am. Chem. Soc 143, 14676–14683 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Le HH et al. Modular metabolite assembly in Caenorhabditis elegans depends on carboxylesterases and formation of lysosome-related organelles. eLife 9, e61886 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Helf MJ, Fox BW, Artyukhin AB, Zhang YK & Schroeder FC Comparative metabolomics with Metaboseek reveals functions of a conserved fat metabolism pathway in C. elegans. Nat. Commun 13, 782 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Komuniecki RW, Hobson RJ, Rex EB, Hapiak VM & Komuniecki PR Biogenic amine receptors in parasitic nematodes: what can be learned from Caenorhabditis elegans? Mol. Biochem Parasitol 137, 1–11 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Curtis BJ et al. Identification of uric acid gluconucleoside-ascaroside conjugates in Caenorhabditis elegans by combining synthesis and MicroED. Org. Lett 22, 6724–6728 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stupp GS et al. Chemical detoxification of small molecules by Caenorhabditis elegans. ACS Chem. Biol 8, 309–313 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wadzinski TJ et al. Rapid phenolic O-glycosylation of small molecules and complex unprotected peptides in aqueous solvent. Nat. Chem 10, 644–652 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Calvo AC, Pey AL, Ying M, Loer CM & Martinez A Anabolic function of phenylalanine hydroxylase in Caenorhabditis elegans. FASEB J. 22, 3046–3058 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mordhorst A et al. Phenylalanine hydroxylase contributes to serotonin synthesis in mice. FASEB J. 35, e21648 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Coleman CM & Neckameyer WS Serotonin synthesis by two distinct enzymes in Drosophila melanogaster. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol 59, 12–31 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Calvo AC, Pey AL, Miranda-Vizuete A, Doskeland AP & Martinez A Divergence in enzyme regulation between Caenorhabditis elegans and human tyrosine hydroxylase, the key enzyme in the synthesis of dopamine. Biochem. J 434, 133–141 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cai HL, Zhu RH & Li HD Determination of dansylated monoamine and amino acid neurotransmitters and their metabolites in human plasma by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem 396, 103–111 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Loer CM, Davidson B & McKerrow J A phenylalanine hydroxylase gene from the nematode C-elegans is expressed in the hypodermis. J. Neurogenet 13, 157–180 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hare EE & Loer CM Function and evolution of the serotonin-synthetic bas-1 gene and other aromatic amino acid decarboxylase genes in Caenorhabditis. BMC Evol. Biol 4, 24 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yemini E, Jucikas T, Grundy LJ, Brown AE & Schafer WR A database of Caenorhabditis elegans behavioral phenotypes. Nat. Methods 10, 877–879 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Flavell SW et al. Serotonin and the neuropeptide PDF initiate and extend opposing behavioral states in C. elegans. Cell 154, 1023–1035 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hartman JH et al. Xenobiotic metabolism and transport in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B Crit. Rev 24, 51–94 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Faghih N et al. A large family of enzymes responsible for the modular architecture of nematode pheromones. J. Am. Chem. Soc 142, 13645–13650 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yamamoto N et al. Update on the Keio collection of Escherichia coli single-gene deletion mutants. Mol. Syst. Biol 5, 335 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Boesmans W et al. Neurotransmitters involved in fast excitatory neurotransmission directly activate enteric glial cells. Neurogastroenterol. Motil 25, e151–e160 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Singhvi A & Shaham S Glia-neuron interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans. Annu. Rev. Neurosci 42, 149–168 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Molina-Garcia L et al. Direct glia-to-neuron transdifferentiation gives rise to a pair of male-specific neurons that ensure nimble male mating. eLife 9, e48361 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jang SW et al. N-acetylserotonin activates TrkB receptor in a circadian rhythm. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3876–3881 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Khidekel N et al. Probing the dynamics of O-GlcNAc glycosylation in the brain using quantitative proteomics. Nat. Chem. Biol 3, 339–348 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Servillo L et al. Serotonin 5-O-beta-glucoside and its N-methylated forms in citrus genus plants. J. Agric. Food Chem 63, 4220–4227 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bortolato M, Chen K & Shih JC The degradation of serotonin: role of MAO. Handb. Behav. Neurobiol. Serotonin 21, 203–218 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ma X, Chen C, Krausz KW, Idle JR & Gonzalez FJ A metabolomic perspective of melatonin metabolism in the mouse. Endocrinology 149, 1869–1879 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lai Y et al. High-coverage metabolomics uncovers microbiota-driven biochemical landscape of interorgan transport and gut-brain communication in mice. Nat. Commun 12, 6000 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Livak KJ & Schmittgen TD Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(T)(-Delta Delta C) method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Schindelin J et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Weinshenker D, Garriga G & Thomas JH Genetic and pharmacological analysis of neurotransmitters controlling egg laying in C. elegans. J. Neurosci 15, 6975–6985 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Source data are provided with this paper. The HPLC–HRMS and MS/ MS data generated during this study have been deposited at MassIVE (gnps.ucsd.edu) under accession code MSV000088750 (https://doi.org/10.25345/C55W01). Source data are provided with this paper.