Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2022 Oct 21;11:1203. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.126884.1

Epidemiology of pediatric schistosomiasis in hard-to-reach areas and populations: A scoping review protocol

Phyllis Munyiva Isaiah 1,2,a, Marta Sólveig Palmeirim 1,2, Peter Steinmann 1,2
PMCID: PMC9898687  PMID: 36761831

Abstract

Background: Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease (NTD) that affects millions of people. Children are the most vulnerable group to developing overt disease. An estimated 779 million people are at risk of schistosomiasis and 50 million preschool-age children (PSAC) need treatment. PSAC are not currently targeted by national chemotherapy campaigns due to a lack of suitable pediatric formulations of praziquantel. The Pediatric Praziquantel Consortium has developed an orally dispersible praziquantel formulation (arpraziquantel) and is facilitating its adoption for schistosomiasis control by endemic countries through the ADOPT program – an implementation research program that paves the way for the large-scale delivery of the child-friendly formulation to treat schistosomiasis in preschool-aged children in endemic countries. A key challenge for comprehensive NTD control including schistosomiasis is reaching all at-risk populations, including those hard to reach. Main access barriers include geographic, social and economic conditions.

Objective : This scoping literature review aims to document the epidemiology of schistosomiasis in children under 6 years of age living in hard-to-reach areas and populations.

Methods : This review will adopt the five-stage scoping review process of identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, study selection, charting data and collating, summarizing and reporting results. Electronic databases including Medline, Web of Science, Embase (Ovid), LILACS and African Journals OnLine (AJOL) will be searched for relevant articles. Two independent reviewers will screen identified articles using a two-stage approach of reviewing the title/abstract and then the full text of provisionally retained articles. Relevant literatures will be downloaded into EndNote X9 to maintain and manage citation and facilitate the overall review process. A meta-analysis will be conducted if indicated.

Relevance : The results will provide insights into the burden of schistosomiasis among marginalized PSAC, aiming to produce evidence on the need for inclusion of this population when designing the expansion of preventive chemotherapy programs.

Keywords: Schistosomiasis, Prevalence, Epidemiology, Pre-School Aged Children, Pediatric, Hard-to-reach, Praziquantel

Abbreviations and acronyms

DALYs: Disability-Adjusted Life Years

NTD: Neglected Tropical Disease

PSAC: Preschool-aged Children

S. haematobium: Schistosoma haematobium

S. mansoni: Schistosoma mansoni

SAC: School-aged children

SDG: Sustainable Development Goal

Introduction

Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease (NTD) that affects millions of people worldwide. It is estimated that 779 million people are at risk of developing this disease. 1 , 2 Children are the most vulnerable group to developing overt disease with 50 million preschool-age (PSAC) children in need of treatment. 3 Adults are most affected by the consequences of chronic infection. 4 Schistosomiasis is cause by an infection with a Schistosoma species parasite. 5 There are several species, the most common being S. mansoni and S. haematobium. In a human host, the adult parasites release eggs into the environment through faeces ( S. mansoni) and urine ( S. haematobium). An intermediate host snail living in stagnant water is involved in the transmission cycle. Human infections take place through skin penetration when in contact with stagnant water where Schistosoma spp. larvae are present. The disease mainly affects the poorest communities without access to safe water and improved sanitation, or exposed to water during occupational and domestic activities. 6 , 7 Symptoms of chronic schistosomiasis include anaemia, cognitive impairment, deficits in linear growth leading to chronic under-nutrition (stunting) as well as acute under-nutrition (wasting), 5 genital lesions, 8 and irreversible organ damage as a result of fibrosis. 9 The morbidity caused by schistosomes is commonly associated with moderate-to-heavy intensities of infection as measured by the density of excreted eggs, and is progressive. 10 In addition to these health consequences, schistosomiasis is associated with negative economic and social impacts. 11 Estimates indicate that schistosomiasis causes an annual loss of 4.5 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). 12

Although NTD control programs have been established in many endemic countries, the rolling out of schistosomiasis control and elimination components is still limited. 13 Periodic deworming with praziquantel, the strategy recommended by WHO for the control of schistosomiasis, is available primarily to school-aged children (SAC; 5-15 years old) who can be reached efficiently through school-based programs. 10 In addition to previous studies, 14 the 2022 WHO guideline on control and elimination of human schistosomiasis 15 has identified important treatment gaps in this strategy, including that infected PSAC are largely left untreated.

This could be because for a long time the PSAC group has been categorized as a low risk group for schistosomiasis infection 16 and its impact on the health of this age group, although unknown, is often considered negligible. 17 In addition, logistical and operational difficulties in collecting samples from PSAC for diagnosis, especially in hard-to-reach areas, lack of sensitive diagnostics for light schistosomiasis infections and a paucity of data on risk factors in PSAC have further biased schistosomiasis research to focus on SAC and adults over the years. 16 Lastly, current donations of the main drug to treat schistosomiasis – praziquantel – are restricted to SAC.

Treatment equity is not currently achieved for schistosomiasis control as hundreds of millions of the worlds’ most vulnerable, most disadvantaged people, including PSAC, are still left behind. This is true especially for people whose incomes are below the federal poverty threshold, who live in vulnerable social and economic situation such as undocumented persons, socially excluded groups due to language, religious and other societal barriers 18 and in the remotest, hardest to reach parts of endemic countries. These hard-to-reach populations are often ethnic minorities, island and fishing communities and migrant populations and other minority or marginalized populations, hindering the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3 and the commitment of global leaders to ensure that “no one is left behind” from development progress. 7 , 19

Objective

This scoping literature review aims to document the epidemiology of pediatric schistosomiasis (children under 6 years of age) living in hard-to-reach areas and populations. In this review, hard-to-reach populations are defined following Shaghaghi et al., as: i) migrants/island and fishing communities/nomads, ii) those living in remote physical and geographical location, and iii) those living in vulnerable social and economic situation such as minority groups, undocumented persons, socially excluded groups due to language and religious barriers. 18

The aim is to produce evidence on the need for inclusion of this population when designing the expansion of preventive chemotherapy to also cover those living in hard-to–reach areas. This is in accordance with the WHO guideline of 2022 on control and elimination of human schistosomiasis 15 recommendation on expansion of preventive chemotherapy to cover all in need.

Review question

The condition, context, and population (CoCoPop) framework to inform the review objective is shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Condition, context, and population framework.

Condition Context Population
Schistosomiasis infection Hard-to-reach populations Children under 6 years

Methods

This review will adopt the five-stage scoping review process guideline recommended by Arksey et. al., 20 taking into consideration the modifications recommended by Peters et al. 21

Evidence searches

Electronic literature databases including Medline, Web of Science, Embase (Ovid), LILACS and African Journals OnLine (AJOL) will be searched for published scientific studies on pediatric schistosomiasis in hard-to reach areas, using a pre-determined search strategy ( Table 2). With the guidance of a librarian (University Medical Library- University of Basel), we first developed and optimized a search strategy for PubMed. This search was then translated using the SR-accelerator tool 22 developed by BOND university to generate the equivalent search terms for Embase (Ovid) and Web of Science.

Table 2. Searching databases and strategies.

a.) PubMed Search Query
(Schistosomiasis [Mesh] OR Schistosom*[tiab] OR Bilharzi*[tiab] OR “blood fluke*”[tiab] OR “snail fever*”[tiab] OR “Katayama fever*”[tiab]) AND (Child [Mesh] OR child [tw] OR children [tw] OR Infant [Mesh] OR infan*[tw] OR newborn*[tw] OR new-born*[tw] OR baby [tw] OR babies [tw] OR suckling*[tw] OR toddler*[tw] OR childhood [tw] OR schoolchild*[tw] OR childcare [tw] OR child-care [tw] OR young [ti] OR youngster*[tw] OR preschool [tw] OR pre-school [tw] OR kid [tw] OR kids [tw] OR boy [tw] OR boys [tw] OR girl*[tw] OR pre-adolescen*[tw] OR schoolage*[tw] OR school-age*[tw] OR schoolboy*[tw] OR schoolgirl*[tw] OR Pediatrics [Mesh] OR Pediatric*[tw] OR Paediatric*[tw] OR (child [all] NOT child [au]) OR children*[all] OR schoolchild*[all] OR “under 5”[tw] OR “<5 year*”[all] OR “<=5 year*”[all] OR infan*[all] OR pediat*[all] OR paediat*[all] OR neonat*[all] OR toddler*[all] OR preteen*[all] OR newborn*[all] OR postneonat*[all] OR postnatal*[all] OR puberty [all] OR preschool*[all] OR suckling*[all] OR juvenile [all] OR “new born*”[all] OR new-born*[all] OR neo-nat*[all] OR neonat*[all] OR perinat*[all] OR underag*[all] OR “under age”[all] OR “under aged”[all] OR youth*[all] OR kinder*[all] OR pubescen*[all] OR prepubescen*[all] OR prepuberty [all] OR “school age”[all] OR “stratified by age”[all] OR schoolage [all] OR “school ages”[all] OR schoolage*[all] OR “one year old”[ti] OR “two year old”[ti] OR “three year old”[ti] OR “four year old”[ti] OR “five year old”[ti] OR “six year old”[ti] OR “1 year old”[ti] OR “2 year old”[ti] OR “3 year old”[ti] OR “4 year old”[ti] OR “5 year old”[ti] OR “6 year old”[ti] OR “two years old”[ti] OR “three years old”[ti] OR “four years old”[ti] OR “five years old”[ti] OR “six years old”[ti] OR “2 years old”[ti] OR “3 years old”[ti] OR “4 years old”[ti] OR “5 years old”[ti] OR “6 years old”[ti]) NOT (animals [Mesh] NOT humans [Mesh])
b.) Web of Science Search Query
(ALL=Schistosomiasis OR (TI=Schistosom* OR AB=Schistosom*) OR (TI=Bilharzi* OR AB=Bilharzi*) OR (TI="blood fluke*" OR AB="blood fluke*") OR (TI="snail fever*" OR AB="snail fever*") OR (TI="Katayama fever*" OR AB="Katayama fever*")) AND (ALL=Child OR ALL=child OR ALL=children OR ALL=Infant OR ALL=infan* OR ALL=newborn* OR ALL=new-born* OR ALL=baby OR ALL=babies OR ALL=suckling* OR ALL=toddler* OR ALL=childhood OR ALL=schoolchild* OR ALL=childcare OR ALL=child-care OR TI=young OR ALL=youngster* OR ALL=preschool OR ALL=pre-school OR ALL=kid OR ALL=kids OR ALL=boy OR ALL=boys OR ALL=girl* OR ALL=pre-adolescen* OR ALL=schoolage* OR ALL=school-age* OR ALL=schoolboy* OR ALL=schoolgirl* OR ALL=Pediatrics OR ALL=Pediatric* OR ALL=Paediatric* OR (ALL=child NOT AU=child) OR ALL=children* OR ALL=schoolchild* OR ALL="under 5" OR ALL="<5 year*" OR ALL="<=5 year*" OR ALL=infan* OR ALL=pediat* OR ALL=paediat* OR ALL=neonat* OR ALL=toddler* OR ALL=preteen* OR ALL=newborn* OR ALL=postneonat* OR ALL=postnatal* OR ALL=puberty OR ALL=preschool* OR ALL=suckling* OR ALL=juvenile OR ALL="new born*" OR ALL=new-born* OR ALL=neo-nat* OR ALL=neonat* OR ALL=perinat* OR ALL=underag* OR ALL="under age" OR ALL="under aged" OR ALL=youth* OR ALL=kinder* OR ALL=pubescen* OR ALL=prepubescen* OR ALL=prepuberty OR ALL="school age" OR ALL="stratified by age" OR ALL=schoolage OR ALL="school ages" OR ALL=schoolage* OR TI="one year old" OR TI="two year old" OR TI="three year old" OR TI="four year old" OR TI="five year old" OR TI="six year old" OR TI="1 year old" OR TI="2 year old" OR TI="3 year old" OR TI="4 year old" OR TI="5 year old" OR TI="6 year old" OR TI="two years old" OR TI="three years old" OR TI="four years old" OR TI="five years old" OR TI="six years old" OR TI="2 years old" OR TI="3 years old" OR TI="4 years old" OR TI="5 years old" OR TI="6 years old") NOT (ALL=animals NOT ALL=humans)
C.) Embase (Ovid) Search Strategy
(exp Schistosomiasis/ OR Schistosom*.tw. OR Bilharzi*.tw. OR “blood fluke*”.tw. OR “snail fever*”.tw. OR “Katayama fever*”.tw.) AND (exp Child/ OR child.mp. OR children.mp. OR exp Infant/ OR infan*.mp. OR newborn*.mp. OR new-born*.mp. OR baby.mp. OR babies.mp. OR suckling*.mp. OR toddler*.mp. OR childhood.mp. OR schoolchild*.mp. OR childcare.mp. OR child-care.mp. OR young.ti. OR youngster*.mp. OR preschool.mp. OR pre-school.mp. OR kid.mp. OR kids.mp. OR boy.mp. OR boys.mp. OR girl*.mp. OR pre-adolescen*.mp. OR schoolage*.mp. OR school-age*.mp. OR schoolboy*.mp. OR schoolgirl*.mp. OR exp Pediatrics/OR Pediatric*.mp. OR Paediatric*.mp. OR (child.af. NOT child.au.) OR children*.af. OR schoolchild*.af. OR “under 5”.mp. OR “<5 year*”.af. OR “<=5 year*”.af. OR infan*.af. OR pediat*.af. OR paediat*.af. OR neonat*.af. OR toddler*.af. OR preteen*.af. OR newborn*.af. OR postneonat*.af. OR postnatal*.af. OR puberty.af. OR preschool*.af. OR suckling*.af. OR juvenile.af. OR “new born*”.af. OR new-born*.af. OR neo-nat*.af. OR neonat*.af. OR perinat*.af. OR underag*.af. OR “under age”.af. OR “under aged”.af. OR youth*.af. OR kinder*.af. OR pubescen*.af. OR prepubescen*.af. OR prepuberty.af. OR “school age”.af. OR “stratified by age”.af. OR schoolage.af. OR “school ages”.af. OR schoolage*.af. OR “one year old”.ti. OR “two year old”.ti. OR “three year old”.ti. OR “four year old”.ti. OR “five year old”.ti. OR “six year old”.ti. OR “1 year old”.ti. OR “2 year old”.ti. OR “3 year old”.ti. OR “4 year old”.ti. OR “5 year old”.ti. OR “6 year old”.ti. OR “two years old”.ti. OR “three years old”.ti. OR “four years old”.ti. OR “five years old”.ti. OR “six years old”.ti. OR “2 years old”.ti. OR “3 years old”.ti. OR “4 years old”.ti. OR “5 years old”.ti. OR “6 years old”.ti.) NOT (exp animals/NOT exp humans/)
d.) AJOL Search Strategy
‘schistosomiasis AND children’
e.) LILACS search Strategy
schistosomiasis AND (children OR Preschool child*)

Published grey literature, WHO literature databases and reports, and documentation obtained from schistosomiasis experts working in relevant organizations such as Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Schistosomiasis Control Initiative Foundation (SCIF), Schistosomiasis Consortium for Operational Research and Evaluation (SCORE), the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Sight Savers, Hellen Keller and Merck KGaA will also be included in this review. Experts will be actively contacted with an invitation to share relevant documents and references.

All identified references will be screened independently by two reviewers (Phyllis Munyiva Isaiah and Marta Palmeirim) using a two-stage approach.

First, a manual search will be conducted on the initial hit list by reviewing the title and abstracts to identify schistosomiasis studies conducted among PSAC. Second, we will review the full texts of the shortlisted articles to identify studies conducted in hard-to-reach areas and populations.

Additional references will then be retrieved by manually searching the bibliographies of identified articles. All relevant literatures will be downloaded into EndNote X9 to maintain and manage citation and facilitate the overall review process.

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

We will include cross-sectional, cohort and case control studies on schistosomiasis in children under 6 years old and living in hard-to-reach areas or belonging to hard-to-reach populations. Similar studies done on women of reproductive age and adults; or studies that did not apply cross-sectional or cohort or case control design (e.g. case reports) will be excluded from the review.

Risk of bias and quality assessment

Reviewers will assess all included studies independently for possible bias by using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool. 23 All selected studies will be assessed using the 10 quality control items suggested by the tool. A score of 1 will be awarded for each item fulfilled while a 0 score will be awarded for each unfilled control item. Score aggregates will then be generated and converted into a low, moderate and high quality classification. 24 Poor quality studies will be excluded, clearly documenting the reason for exclusion.

Data extraction and synthesis

Data will be extracted from included documents and exported to a predefined summary template in Microsoft excel 2016. Extracted data will include:

  • i.

    Bibliographic information (first author, journal/document, year of publication)

  • ii.

    Year and country of study

  • iii.

    Sample size

  • iv.

    Study population age and sex

  • v.

    Prevalence and/or incidence of schistosomiasis

  • vi.

    Mean eggs per gram of feces or infection intensity classification (if available)

  • vii.

    Specific schistosome species observed

  • viii.

    Diagnostic method

  • ix.

    Type of hard-to-reach population/area

Data analysis

Extracted data will be analyzed using IBM SPSS statistics V.24. Descriptive statistics will be performed to allow for narrative synthesis. Weighted population mean outcomes will then be calculated for prevalence among PSAC. 25 To calculate pooled prevalence estimates (PPE), the inverse variance heterogeneity (IVhet) model 26 in MetaXL will be used for the selected studies, to ensure that statistical error is not underestimated. 24 The level of heterogeneity on selected studies will be evaluated using Cochran’s Q and I 2 statistics. This will be done by stratifying our data according to schistosomiasis prevalence and the region where the studies were conducted to determine heterogeneity between subgroups and within-groups. 24 Forest plots will be used to show the estimated prevalence (95% confidence interval).

Dissemination of results

All findings will be published in a scientific article in a peer reviewed journal. The findings of this review will be reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses–Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA –ScR) guidelines.

Study status

Electronic databases have been searched using the above-mentioned search strategy for articles. The reviewers are currently screening the articles for duplicates.

Data availability

No data are associated with this article.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Dr. Thomas Fürst (University Medical Library- University of Basel) for his input and guidance in developing and optimizing search strategies used in this review.

Funding Statement

The authors declare that no grants were involved in supporting this work. The first author is the recipient of a personal stipend by the Amt für Ausbildungsbeiträge (AfA) Basel-Stadt. The last author is a member of the Pediatric Praziquantel Consortium.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]

References

  • 1. Steinmann P, et al. : Schistosomiasis and water resources development: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimates of people at risk. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2006;6(7):411–425. 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70521-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Utzinger J, et al. : Schistosomiasis and neglected tropical diseases: towards integrated and sustainable control and a word of caution. Parasitology. 2009;136(13):1859–1874. 10.1017/S0031182009991600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Organization WH: Report of a meeting to review the results of studies on the treatment of schistosomiasis in preschool-age children. 2011.
  • 4. Adenowo AF, et al. : Impact of human schistosomiasis in sub-Saharan Africa. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2015;19:196–205. 10.1016/j.bjid.2014.11.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Gryseels B, et al. : Human schistosomiasis. Lancet. 2006;368(9541):1106–1118. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69440-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Hotez PJ, et al. : Control of neglected tropical diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;357(10):1018–1027. 10.1056/NEJMra064142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Tchuem Tchuenté L-A, et al. : Moving from control to elimination of schistosomiasis in sub-Saharan Africa: time to change and adapt strategies. Infect. Dis. Poverty. 2017;6(1):1–14. 10.1186/s40249-017-0256-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Parkin DM: The global burden of urinary bladder cancer. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 2008;42(sup218):12–20. 10.1080/03008880802285032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. King CH: Toward the elimination of schistosomiasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360(2):106–109. 10.1056/NEJMp0808041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Stothard JR, et al. : Schistosomiasis in African infants and preschool children: let them now be treated!. Trends Parasitol. 2013;29(4):197–205. 10.1016/j.pt.2013.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hotez PJ, et al. : Rescuing the bottom billion through control of neglected tropical diseases. Lancet. 2009;373(9674):1570–1575. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60233-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Mnkugwe RH, et al. : Prevalence and correlates of intestinal schistosomiasis infection among school-aged children in North-Western Tanzania. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0228770. 10.1371/journal.pone.0228770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Colley DG, et al. : Contributions of the Schistosomiasis Consortium for Operational Research and Evaluation (SCORE) to schistosomiasis control and elimination: key findings and messages for future goals, thresholds, and operational research. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2020;103(1 Suppl):125–134. 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bustinduy AL, et al. : Expanding praziquantel (PZQ) access beyond mass drug administration programs: paving a way forward for a pediatric PZQ formulation for schistosomiasis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016;10(9):e0004946. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Organization WH: WHO guideline on control and elimination of human schistosomiasis.s2022. Reference Source [PubMed]
  • 16. Osakunor DN, Woolhouse ME, Mutapi F: Paediatric schistosomiasis: What we know and what we need to know. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018;12(2):e0006144. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Jordan P, Webbe G: Human schistosomiasis. Human schistosomiasis. 1969.
  • 18. Shaghaghi A, Bhopal RS, Sheikh A: Approaches to recruiting ‘hard-to-reach’populations into research: a review of the literature. Health Promot. Perspect. 2011;1(2):86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Organization WH: Ending the neglect to attain the sustainable development goals: a road map for neglected tropical diseases 2021–2030. 2020.
  • 20. Arksey H, O'Malley L: Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Peters MD, et al. : Scoping reviews. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual. 2017;2015:1–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Clark JM, et al. : Improving the translation of search strategies using the Polyglot Search Translator: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA. 2020;108(2):195–207. 10.5195/jmla.2020.834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Munn Z, et al. : The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Int. J. Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(3):123–128. 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kalinda C, Mindu T, Chimbari MJ: A systematic review and meta-analysis quantifying schistosomiasis infection burden in pre-school aged children (PreSAC) in sub-Saharan Africa for the period 2000–2020. PLoS One. 2020;15(12):e0244695. 10.1371/journal.pone.0244695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Speiser S, et al. : Update on Noma: systematic review on classification, outcomes and follow-up of patients undergoing reconstructive surgery after Noma disease. BMJ Open. 2021;11(8):e046303. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Doi SA, et al. : Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials I: the inverse variance heterogeneity model. Contemp. Clin. Trials. 2015;45:130–138. 10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2023 Jan 10. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.139341.r156448

Reviewer response for version 1

Zhou Xiao-Nong 1,2

The authors are trying to review epidemiology of pediatric schistosomiasis in hard-to-reach areas and populations, the results will provide evidences to designing the extension of preventive chemotherapy (PC) programs in the global schistosomiasis control program, by using the five-stage scoping review process. It is worthwhile for publication of the protocol due to big gaps are existed in the previous global NTDs program that focus only on the population over 6 years old. But there are several limitations to design the protocol based on the objectives of the study, which can overcome by revision of the study protocol.

  1. The scope of the population to be studied: based on the objectives to provide evidence to designing the extension of PC program, it is essential to understand the current situation of all pre-school age children (PSAC) versus PSAC living in the hard-to-reach areas. Therefore, in the protocol, it is suggested to include the data from whole PSAC population, then to compare the epidemic features between PSAC living in the hard-to-reach areas and all of PSAC in endemic areas.

  2. The definition of hard-to-reach areas and hard-to-reach population should be different, but the authors only provide the definition of hard-to-reach population, which covers three types of features. For my understanding, the PSAC population living in the hard-to reach areas is the part of hard-to-reach population. In addition, those living in rich areas but always in the migrate status, such as boat family, etc. So it is suggested to give definitions both of hard-to-reach areas as well as hard-to-reach populations.

  3. In the objective part, it is suggested to firstly provide a general objective with two to three specific aims, to indicate detail objectives of the study designing. Then followed by the definitions and scope of the review, in order to clearly describe the final outcomes of the study.

  4. In the Methods part, it is suggested to provide the detail information of the data analysis, due to there is vague information of the statistical analysis approach provided in the current version. It is also suggested to provide the data collection tables as attached file, which is very important for researchers to collect data and form the datasets as well as to perform the data handling by using unified SOPs in different countries where studying.

  5. Under the Methods part, data extraction and synthesis, point vi. “Mean eggs per gram f feces or infection intensity classification (if available) “ is only suitable for S. mansoni infection, but not suitable for S. haematobium. So please revise this sentence by consideration of both species of schistosomes.

Is the study design appropriate for the research question?

Partly

Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?

Yes

Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Epidemiolgoy of schistosomiasis

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2023 Jan 13.
Phyllis Isaiah 1

Question 1:  The scope of the population to be studied: based on the objectives to provide evidence to designing the extension of PC program, it is essential to understand the current situation of all pre-school age children (PSAC) versus PSAC living in the hard-to-reach areas. Therefore, in the protocol, it is suggested to include the data from whole PSAC population, then to compare the epidemic features between PSAC living in the hard-to-reach areas and all of PSAC in endemic areas.

Response : Thank you for the feedback.

A recent study by Kalinda et al., 2020 conducted a systematic review of schistosomiasis infection burden among PSAC. We also anticipate that in view of the availability of pediatric praziquantel, intervention need will shift to ensure the very marginalized PSAC are covered, hence the focus on hard-to-reach areas and population. We have however compared the results of the systematic review by Kalinda and colleagues with our results in the actual scoping review manuscript.

Question 2: The definition of hard-to-reach areas and hard-to-reach population should be different, but the authors only provide the definition of hard-to-reach population, which covers three types of features. For my understanding, the PSAC population living in the hard-to reach areas is the part of hard-to-reach population. In addition, those living in rich areas but always in the migrate status, such as boat family, etc. So it is suggested to give definitions both of hard-to-reach areas as well as hard-to-reach populations.

Response:  Thank you for pointing this out. This has been amended in the protocol.

Question 3: In the objective part, it is suggested to firstly provide a general objective with two to three specific aims, to indicate detail objectives of the study designing. Then followed by the definitions and scope of the review, in order to clearly describe the final outcomes of the study.

Response:  Thank you for pointing this out. This has been amended in the protocol. We had only one objective.

Question 4: In the Methods part, it is suggested to provide the detail information of the data analysis, due to there is vague information of the statistical analysis approach provided in the current version. It is also suggested to provide the data collection tables as attached file, which is very important for researchers to collect data and form the datasets as well as to perform the data handling by using unified SOPs in different countries where studying.

Response:  Thank you for pointing this out. This has been amended in the protocol. An annex (a data collection table) has been attached.

Question 5: Under the Methods part, data extraction and synthesis, point vi. “Mean eggs per gram f feces or infection intensity classification (if available) “ is only suitable for S. mansoni infection, but not suitable for S. haematobium. So please revise this sentence by consideration of both species of schistosomes.

Response:  Thank you for pointing this out. This has been amended in the protocol.

F1000Res. 2022 Dec 15. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.139341.r156449

Reviewer response for version 1

Dirk Engels 1

The study is relevant as it is clearly important, especially in view of the ADOPT programme for pediatric praziquantel, to have best estimates of the global number of pre-school age children to be reached. My main remark would be: with such a substantial scoping review, why limiting the study to hard-to-reach populations only? I suggest to expand to all eligible studies reporting on schistosomiasis in PSAC and treat hard-to-reach populations as a sub-analysis. In this way as-broad-as-possible information is captured in one scoping review, leaving all options open for an access plan

Is the study design appropriate for the research question?

Yes

Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?

Yes

Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Tropical Diseases

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2023 Jan 13.
Phyllis Isaiah 1

Question 1: The study is relevant as it is clearly important, especially in view of the ADOPT programme for pediatric praziquantel, to have best estimates of the global number of pre-school age children to be reached. My main remark would be: with such a substantial scoping review, why limiting the study to hard-to-reach populations only? I suggest to expand to all eligible studies reporting on schistosomiasis in PSAC and treat hard-to-reach populations as a sub-analysis. In this way as-broad-as-possible information is captured in one scoping review, leaving all options open for an access plan

Response : Thank you for the feedback.

A recent study by Kalinda et al., 2020 conducted a systematic review of schistosomiasis infection burden among PSAC. We also anticipate that in view of the availability of pediatric praziquantel, intervention need will shift to ensure the very marginalized PSAC are covered, hence the focus on hard-to-reach areas and population. We have however compared the results of the systematic review by Kalinda and colleagues with our results in the actual scoping review manuscript.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    No data are associated with this article.


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES