Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2023 Jan 23;13(1):145–154. doi: 10.1007/s12553-022-00719-x

Artificial intelligence for non-invasive glycaemic-events detection via ECG in a paediatric population: study protocol

Martina Andellini 1,, Salman Haleem 1, Massimiliano Angelini 3, Matteo Ritrovato 2, Riccardo Schiaffini 4, Ernesto Iadanza 1,5, Leandro Pecchia 1
PMCID: PMC9899724  PMID: 36761922

Abstract

Purpose

Paediatric Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) patients are at greater risk for developing severe hypo and hyperglycaemic events due to poor glycaemic control. To reduce the risk of adverse events, patients need to achieve the best possible glycaemic management through frequent blood glucose monitoring with finger prick or Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) systems. However, several non-invasive techniques have been proposed aiming at exploiting changes in physiological parameters based on glucose levels. The overall objective of this study is to validate an artificial intelligence (AI) based algorithm to detect glycaemic events using ECG signals collected through non-invasive device.

Methods

This study will enrol T1D paediatric participants who already use CGM. Participants will wear an additional non-invasive wearable device for recording physiological data and respiratory rate. Glycaemic measurements driven through ECG variables are the main outcomes. Data collected will be used to design, develop and validate the personalised and generalized classifiers based on a deep learning (DL) AI algorithm, able to automatically detect hypoglycaemic events by using few ECG heartbeats recorded with wearable devices.

Results

Data collection is expected to be completed approximately by June 2023. It is expected that sufficient data will be collected to develop and validate the AI algorithm.

Conclusion

This is a validation study that will perform additional tests on a larger diabetes sample population to validate the previous pilot results that were based on four healthy adults, providing evidence on the reliability of the AI algorithm in detecting glycaemic events in paediatric diabetic patients in free-living conditions.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03936634. Registered on 11 March 2022, retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05278143?titles=AI+for+Glycemic+Events+Detection+Via+ECG+in+a+Pediatric+Population&draw=2&rank=1.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12553-022-00719-x.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI); Non-invasive glycaemia detection; ECG signal processing, paediatric type 1 diabetes (T1D)

Introduction

Background

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) has been one of the most common chronic diseases among children and adolescents since the last two decades. The prevalence of T1D worldwide varies significantly across countries [1, 2]. The European Childhood Diabetes Registry shows a 3.4% increase per annum in incidence rate in Europe suggesting that the incidence rate will duplicate over the next 20 years [3]. The paediatric patients suffering from T1D are at greater risk for developing acute rather than chronic complications, compared to adult patients [4]. In fact, chronic complications usually appear after decades of T1D, and it is extremely uncommon for children or adolescents to develop significant diabetic microvascular or macro-vascular complications. Therefore, it is pivotal that those paediatric patients achieve an optimal T1D management by reducing the HbA1c levels and glycaemic variability.

Several studies confirmed that a good management of diabetes during the paediatric age not only reduces the risk of adverse events but is able to delay the onset of long-term complications [5, 6]. The T1D management requires daily Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG). The increase in daily frequency of SMBG is highly correlated with the reduction in HbA1c level which is associated with occurrence of complications [7]. However, paediatric and adolescent patients may struggle with SMBG and self T1D management not only due to paradigm shift in diet, but also because SMBG require the use of finger pricks which are invasive and cumbersome. This, as a consequence, may affect patient compliance with the glucose measurement [8]. As an alternative, Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) can infer glucose levels in real-time based on glucose in interstitial fluid which may help in reducing self-care burden in terms of improvement in non-invasive capture of glycaemic values per day without frequent finger prick. The use of CGM devices has shown significant improvement of glucose control among diabetic patients [9, 10]. Nevertheless, CGM devices are expensive and can be only worn between 7 and 14 days [11, 12]. Besides, the reliability and accuracy of the CGM values during low blood glucose levels has been questioned in some studies as there are no international standards for regulating the measurements [1317]. They are not designed to combine glycaemic values with other physiological parameters, food intake or activity measures, which are pivotal in diabetes management. Above all, the CGM devices require cannula to be inserted in subcutaneous tissue which still make them invasive and intolerable by the skin of the paediatric subjects.

Over the last few years, with increased number of wearable sensors developed for tracking physiological signal, several studies have been proposed to estimate the blood glucose levels by combining CGM data with physiological signals for determining glycaemic events [18, 19]. These strategies have the potential to overcome the limitation of the CGM devices in terms of non-invasive detection blood glucose levels [2023], while combining physiological parameters, physical activity, and food intake for estimation of glycaemic events such as hypoglycaemia (event with blood glucose lower than normal) and hyperglycaemia (event with blood glucose higher than normal) [20, 24, 25]. Therefore, the development of a non-invasive real-time monitoring system which is able to estimate blood glucose levels and/or detect glycaemic events is of great interest.

Previous clinical studies have shown that glycaemic events affect certain cardiac characteristics of the heart in healthy, type 1 diabetic and type 2 diabetic subjects [5, 2630]. These cardiac characteristics can be represented by Heart Rate Variability (HRV) parameters such as beat intervals, power spectrum etc. [31]. Moreover, also the relationships of heart rate with hyperglycaemia has been studied, emerging that it was associated with reduced HRV [32]. The recurring electrocardiogram (ECG) alterations when hypo or hyperglycaemic event occurs are P-R interval shortening, ST-segment depression, T-wave flattening and QT-interval prolongation during hypoglycaemic events, reduction of R-R variability, QT interval variability, corrected QT interval variability and increase of P-R interval [33, 34].

With the relatively recent introduction of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in health diagnosis and monitoring, several machine learning models have been developed for hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia detection, all relying on the analysis of the previously mentioned ECG alterations. A literature review highlighted that much more efforts have been spent on the study of hypoglycaemia classification and detection compared to hyperglycaemia (39 studies vs. 5, respectively) [35]. Results from our preliminary study, carried out in 2019, are promising in this field [18, 19]. In these studies, we successfully applied advanced deep learning and mathematical modelling techniques, coupled with raw ECG signals, to identify nocturnal glycaemic episodes with a high degree of accuracy. However, this initial pilot work was conducted on healthy adults, thus, without a clinical classification of diabetes. For this reason, this study proposes to expand such results to a wider cohort of paediatric diabetes patients, creating a dedicated, and extended dataset specific to enhance the accuracy, robustness and validation of machine learning and deep learning models. It will lead to the development of the generalized model for non-invasive detection of glycaemic events based on ECG signals.

Rationale

This study is a validation and developmental project. We have conducted a pilot study showing that hypoglycaemic events can be automatically detected using short-term ECG signals recorded with wearable devices in free-living conditions by developing deep learning based models under personalized setup [18, 19]. The proposed system can automatically learn patterns in the ECG heartbeat, discriminating between heartbeats recorded during low or normal glucose levels in the same subject. The deep learning approach has shown significantly better performance compared to traditional machine learning due to their capability of extracting ECG heartbeat patterns at both spatial and temporal levels. However, we need to demonstrate the accuracy, robustness, and generalization of the AI model for detecting glycaemic events in diabetic patient groups. As a result, the proposal is focused on gathering physiological data from diabetes patients in order to test and validate our AI models.

Objectives

The purpose of this single-centre, observational, single-arm study is to validate our novel AI model for non-invasive detection of glycaemic events. To achieve this, we aim to detect and measure the relationship between glucose fluctuations in the blood and ECG variability under hypoglycaemic, glycaemic and hyperglycaemic events. The ECG signals will be recorded via non-invasive wearable devices for physiological signal measurements whereas blood glucose will be monitored via CGM for T1D paediatric patients under free-living conditions.

Materials and methods

Study setting

This is a single-centre, observational, single-arm study. It is conducted at the Unit of Endocrinology and Diabetes in Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Rome, Italy. The study adheres the ethical principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki and the National Health and Medical Research Council statement. The protocol was defined following the SPIRIT 2013 checklist (recommended items to address in a clinical trial protocol and related documents) the study has been prospectively registered in clinicaltrial.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05278143).

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Both male and female subjects diagnosed with T1D, aged less than 18 years old who are currently under the care of the Unit of Endocrinology and Diabetes of Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Rome, Italy and who use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems are eligible to be involved in the study. Patients with coexistence of celiac disease or non-diabetic hypoglycaemia or cardiovascular pathologies and cardiac arrhythmias are excluded. Furthermore, patients who are pregnant or becoming pregnant during the study are also excluded as well as patients that use standard finger prick glucometer to measure glycaemic values.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria
 Age less than 18 years old
 Diagnosed with type 1 diabetes
 Use of continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGM)
Exclusion criteria
 Use of standard finger prick glucometer to measure glycaemic values
 Being pregnant or becoming pregnant during the study
 Coexistence of celiac disease
 Coexistence of non-diabetic hypoglycaemia
 Coexistence of cardiovascular pathologies and cardiac arrhythmias

Enrolment procedure

Written, informed consent is obtained from parents or caregivers of each paediatric patient who decided to join the study during regular visits. Paediatric patients and parents or caregivers are trained at the end of the regular diabetes visit by a member of the study team. During the study, participants continue to receive the diabetes care which they manage regularly as per clinical advice. In this way, the study participation will not affect in any way the clinical path of the recruited patients. Participants will be assigned a code number. The database that links the subject identity to the code number will be kept by the medical doctor of the study team and protected by username and password.

Sample size

In this study, 64 paediatric patients with T1D are going to be enrolled. The number of subjects was chosen to ensure that there is sufficient evidence that the approaches we propose are generalizable and consistent with prior similar research that enrolled between 21 and 43 subjects In this study, 64 paediatric patients with T1D are going to be enrolled. The number of subjects was chosen to ensure that there is sufficient evidence that the approaches we propose are generalizable and consistent with prior similar research that enrolled between 21 and 43 subjects [36, 37].

Study procedure

A graphical representation of the study protocol is showed in `. 1. As per inclusion criteria, the study participants continue to use their CGM device they are already using. During their routine diabetes hospital visit, the participants are asked to wear an additional wearable device, Medtronic Zephyr BioPatch, for recording the physiological data for a period of up to three days. After receiving the training session and relevant information about the study, the participants are allowed to return home with the wearable device attached. During the hospital visit, the quality-of-life questionnaire for paediatric patients (PEdsQL) is submitted to recruited patients [38, 39]. They are asked to answer questions on how T1D affects their daily activities.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Shows the study procedure. During the patients’ routine diabetes hospital visit, recruited patients (that already use CGM sensors) are asked to wear an additional wearable device, Medtronic Zephyr BioPatch, for recording the physiological data for a period of up to 3 days. After receiving the training session and relevant information about the study, the participants are allowed to return home with the wearable device attached. During the hospital visit, the PEdsQL is submitted to recruited patients. During the monitoring days, patients can continue their daily activities undisturbed, without any changes in either physical activities or diet. They should wear the sensor during the day and the night and remove it while showering. The device should be approximately charged every 12-hours. For this reason, patients were provided with two devices. While wearing the second device the one used during the day should be recharged and vice versa. At the end of the third day, patients should return the devices to the hospital (This picture was created by the authors)

During the monitoring days, patients can continue their daily activities undisturbed, without any changes in either physical activities or diet. In this way, data gathered from free-living conditions are obtained. Patients receive regular contact from the research team not only to check on their safety and wellbeing, but also to ensure the data collection is successful. At the end of the third day, patients should return the devices to the hospital.

Continuous glucose levels are measured using the CGM device that each patient already use. Patients who use FreeStyle Libre Flash glucose monitoring system, Dexcom G6 or Medtronic Guardian sensor are included in the study. The former measures the interstitial glucose every 15 min, the others every five minutes. Each glucose sensor can be used for up to two weeks, also while showering, and, according to the manufacturer, it does not require any calibration with finger pricks (see Table 2).

Table 2.

Main technical characteristics of Freestyle Libre, Dexcom G6 and Medtronic CGM sensors. [Adapted by ECRI Institute]

MANUFACTURER Abbott Diabetes Care Div Abbott Laboratories Inc
FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System
Dexcom Inc
G6 CGM System
Medtronic Diabetes USA Div Medtronic Inc
Guardian Sensor 3 with Guardian Connect
SAMPLE TYPE Interstitial fluid Interstitial fluid Interstitial fluid
MEASUREMENT RANGE, mg/dL 40–500 40–400 40–400
SENSOR
Life, days ≤ 14 ≤ 10 ≤ 7
Type Filament Transcutaneous Transcutaneous
Placement Back of upper arm Abdomen (adult), abdomen and upper buttocks (paediatric) Abdomen and arm
TRANSMITTER
Water resistant Submerged ≤ 1 m (3 ft) and 30 min Submerged ≤ 2.4 m (8 ft) and ≤ 24 h, IP28 IPX8
Operating time, hr 348 3 months 170
RECEIVER
Smartphone compatible Yes Yes Yes
Display type LCD Not specified NA (depends on phone)
Frequency of glucose readings shown Every min (stored every 15 min) Every 5 min Every 5 min
Rechargeable/replaceable Battery Rechargeable Rechargeable NA (depends on phone)
Life, days 7 2 NA (depends on phone)
Memory: Number of stored readings with timestamp 90 days of normal use including continuous glucose readings (stored every 15 min) and daily blood glucose results 30 days of data 90 days via Mobile App
DATA MANAGEMENT
Software FreeStyle Libre Dexcom Clarity (web-based diabetes management software, automatically uploads data when using a smart device) CareLink Professional
Patient input Food, insulin, exercise, medication, ≤ 6 customizable notes; reminders, 3 predefined (check glucose, take insulin, alarm) and ≤ 9 reminders customizable through software Carbohydrates, exercise, insulin, health events Event markers for meals, insulin injections, exercise, blood glucose
ALERT INDICATORS, TYPE Audible or vibrating Audible, vibrating, visual Audible or vibrating
ALARMS
High/low glucose concentration No Yes Yes
Rate of change No Yes Yes
Predictive No Yes Yes

The Medtronic Zephyr BioPatch is a CE marked device and it works with 250 Hz sampling frequency and ECG amplitude between 0.25 and 15 mV. The performance of this sensor as a remote patient monitoring device was assessed and validated in previous clinical trials1. To acquire the biomedical signals, the wearable device is positioned using two gel electrodes on the patient’s chest, below the sternal notch. This device should be removed before bathing, showering, or swimming, and then worn again as explained during the training session. The device can store up to three days of ECG recordings, its battery can last for 36 h and can be fully charged in less than one hour. Therefore, each volunteer will be given two devices and instructed to change it approximately every 12-hours before showering. The Zephyr also records breathing waveform and 3-axis accelerations through which activity level and posture can be computed and physical activity can be assessed. Although the sensor can remotely record real time signals via Bluetooth, this functionality will be disabled, and the data will be downloaded by the researcher at the end of three to four days monitoring.

Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

The primary outcome of the study is the detection of glycaemic events.

The glycaemic events can be determined non-invasively via ECG signals by the automated AI algorithm which are trained according to glucose measurements from the CGM and the cutoff-criteria for different glycaemic events: severe hypoglycaemia (glucose level < 50 mg/dl), hypoglycaemia (50 mg/dl < glucose level < 70 mg/dl), normal glycaemia (70 mg/dl < glucose level < 180 mg/dl), hyperglycaemia (180 mg/dl < glucose level < 240 mg/dl), severe hyperglycaemia (glucose level > 240 mg/dl).

The difference in ECG signals for different glycaemic events can be quantified through the assessment of the ECG variables (heart rate (BPM), physical activity and posture (lying, standing, walking, running) and Heart Rate Variability (HRV) features.[31] These features can be categorized as:

  • Interval across different fiducial points (millisecond): We have five fiducial points (P.Q.R,S,T) and we can have total of 9 intervals among them.

  • Slope across different fiducial points (mV/ms): We have five fiducial points (P.Q.R,S,T) and we can have total of 9 slopes among them.

  • Absolute power (ms2/Hz): The signal energy can be determined for 5 min ECG excerpt within Ultra Low Frequency (ULF) (≤ 0.003 Hz), Very Low Frequency (VLF) (0.0033–0.04 Hz), Low Frequency (LF) (0.04–0.15 Hz) and High Frequency (HF) (0.15–0.4 Hz).

Secondary outcomes

Clinical outcomes will be assessed through the analysis of glycaemic values collected from CGM device. The condition of each patient is evaluated according to glycated haemoglobin level (HbA1c), mean glucose level and glycaemic variability, along with the frequency of glycaemic events (severe hypoglycaemia, hypoglycaemia, hyperglycaemia, and severe hyperglycaemia) and the time spent by subjects (minutes per day) in a specific range of glycaemic values (severe hypoglycaemia, hypoglycaemia, hyperglycaemia, and severe hyperglycaemia). Table 3 shows complete list of glycaemic variables with their measure’s units and cut-off criteria.

Table 3.

Glycaemic Variables with their Measures/Units and Cut-off Criteria

Glycaemic variables Measures-Unit Cut off Criteria
Glycated haemoglobin level (HbA1c) (%, mmol/mol) -
Mean glucose level mg/dL -
Glycaemic variability mg/dL -
Frequency of severe hypoglycaemic events Frequency (%) Glucose level < 50 mg/dl
Time in severe hypoglycaemia Min/day Glucose level < 50 mg/dl
Frequency of hypoglycaemic events Frequency (%) 50 mg/dl < Glucose level < 70 mg/dl
Time in hypoglycaemia Min/day 50 mg/dl < Glucose level < 70 mg/dl
Normal time in range Min/day 70 mg/dl < Glucose level < 180 mg/dl
Frequency of hyperglycaemic events Frequency (%) 180 mg/dl > Glucose level > 240 mg/dl
Time in hyperglycaemia Min/day 180 mg/dl > Glucose level > 240 mg/dl
Frequency of severe hyperglycaemic events Frequency (%) Glucose level > 240 mg/dl
Time in severe hyperglycaemia Min/day Glucose level > 240 mg/dl

Furthermore, the quality of life of recruited patients with T1D will be assessed through PedsQL questionnaire. The health-related quality of life questionnaire for paediatric age follows the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation from 1948 for investigating the quality of life of children through the physical, psychological (emotional and cognitive aspects), and social health dimensions [38, 39].

Data management

The data collected will be biomedical signals (including ECG, Breathing), continuous glucose levels, biomechanical variables (3D trunk accelerations), and personal information (age, gender). All study data will be anonymized and stored on the secure Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital server. The data will be securely stored in a folder accessible only by researchers involved in the study with username and password.

Data analysis and modelling

Data processing

The effect of glycaemic events (both hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia) on the ECG signals across different times of the day will be examined. Before performance of data analytical methods, we aim to deploy data pre-processing methods to extract relevant patterns from raw ECG signals. The extracted ECG signals may be affected by noise occurred due to body movement, respiration, and device electrodes. Therefore, we will perform baseline wander removal [40, 41] in order to remove low frequency noise followed by signal normalization at zero mean and unit variance. We will then perform the ECG segmentation in order to segment ECG beats and detect fiducial points using our segmentation tool developed in a recent study for cardiovascular disease detection [42]. We will divide the ECG data into five to fifteen minutes excerpts in order to annotate them as normal, severe hypoglycaemic or severe hyperglycaemic events [43]. Population will be described in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. For CGM signals, considering the different frequencies of glucose readings across the devices (Table 2), we perform linear interpolation to estimate blood glucose measurements at every second with respect to real time ECG signals.

Data analysis

Processed data will be analysed using statistical software (e.g., SPSS) and programming languages (such as Python or R) using descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. We aim to determine HRV parameters using the fiducial points determined from our ECG segmentation tool. The HRV parameters can be categorized into time-domain features, frequency domain features and non-linear features [31]. Time-domain features include the length and slope among the fiducial points (P, Q, R, S and T). The frequency-domain features include power spectrum in different frequency bands of the short-term ECG excerpts. Other nonlinear features include fluctuations and entropy of ECG excerpts. We will use the packages from Python such as neurokit2 [44] and heartpy [45] in order to determine frequency-domain features and other nonlinear features. We will perform statistical tests such as ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U Test and Wilcoxon signed tests to determine the statistical significant difference among HRV features from different glycaemic events [46, 47].

Data modelling

The inherent part of the project is to develop the mathematical models in order to predict and detect the glycaemic events based on ECG signals. The mathematical modelling will lead to development of the artificial intelligence-based models. The artificial intelligence based models vary from traditional machine learning models (such as Support Vector Machines (SVM), Decision Trees, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) etc.) to advanced deep learning based models [48]. The traditional machine learning models have the capability to train the static features extracted in both time and frequency domains. However, before training the model, we need to apply a features selection step in order to determine the most suitable features relevant to the glycaemic event classification [49]. On the other hand, deep learning models have the capability to train ECG beat features along with their temporal context without prior requirement of feature selection methods [50]. For modelling purposes, we aim to use well-known frameworks and packages such as tensorflow, theano, keras, torch, spark, pandas, scikit-learn, matlab etc. [51].

Ethics approval

The study protocol adheres to the ethical principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki and the National Health and Medical Research Council statement and was approved by the Ethical Committee of Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Rome, Italy (2260_OPBG_2020). All participants and their parents or caregivers will be provided with complete information related to their future participation to the study. They will be required to fill in a written consent form, where the methods, advantages and disadvantages in taking part to the experiment will be explained. This will provide a clear understanding of the procedure, assure that their information will be kept strictly confidential, that their participation is voluntary, and that they have a right to withdraw at any time during the study. This study participation will not impose any risks for patients and will not affect in any way the clinical path of the recruited patients, as they will continue to receive their usual diabetes care, and they will continue to manage diabetes as usual.

Results

Data collection is expected to be completed approximately by June 2023. It is expected that sufficient data will be collected to develop and validate the generalized AI algorithm. Study results will be disseminated through peer reviewed journals, a doctoral thesis and conference presentations.

Discussion

The main purpose of this study is the development of automated methods for non-invasive detection of hypoglycaemic and hyperglycaemic events among paediatric patients suffering from Type 1 Diabetes (T1D). Although glycaemic events can result in acute complications among children and adolescent more frequently than in adults, however their effective management can be helpful in avoiding chronic conditions that could also result in death. Under current clinical setup, the glycaemic events are determined using invasive and cumbersome finger prick methods, which can lead the paediatric population not to be fully compliant with the diabetic management protocols. Therefore, the development of non-invasive methods is pivotal for optimal T1D management among paediatric population.

The primary aim of this observational study is to validate and improve a non-invasive method for the detection of blood glucose levels, developed during a pilot work in 2020 [43]. This pilot work was based on detection of hypoglycaemic events based on ECG signals from healthy subjects. Results of the pilot study showed that the developed personalized classifiers based on deep-learning artificial intelligence algorithms, can perform automatic detection of hypoglycaemic events using the morphology and the short-term ECG intervals recorded with wearable devices in free-living conditions. This study is designed to improve the efficiency and robustness of the personalized model towards Type 1 Diabetes patients.

Conclusion

This study approved by the Ethical Committee on March 2021 (2260_OPBG_2020). Recruitment started on May 2021 and is expected to be completed approximately by June 2023.

The primary aim of this study is the development of the generalized AI model for detection of hypoglycaemic and hyperglycaemic events in both healthy and diabetic patients. The generalized model needs to be trained and tested in a variety of healthy and diabetic subjects for accurate detection of glycaemic events. The development of the accurate and robust generalized model is pivotal for efficient management of the diabetes in paediatric population, drastically reducing pain and discomfort of using invasive methods to continuously measure glucose levels.

As secondary outcomes, this study aims at investigating clinical variables and quality of life of patients recruited. These variables will be investigated in order to provide a database for paediatric patients. Publicly available data on paediatric diabetes patients are still lacking, and this study will also aim at collecting clinical and quality of life data for this category of patients.

We believe that this intervention will strongly support and progress diabetes care research for children and young adults with type 1 diabetes, improving glycaemic control and consequently the quality of life.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (60.2KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We thank Warwick-Wellcome Trust Translational Partnership, grant number WT-219429/Z/19/Z for support this research. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author contributions

All authors have contributed to this protocol. MAnd, MSH, MR, RS and LP contributed to the creation and design of the study. MAnd, MAng, MR and RS were involved in enrolling and monitoring patients. MA and MSH designed and drafted the manuscript under the supervision of LP. RS provided his contribution from clinical perspectives. MA, MR, RS and LP provided their contribution for proposal development and for ethical committee protocol submission. EI and LP provided their feedback on the proposal and reviewed several times.

Funding

This work was supported by the Warwick-Wellcome Trust Translational Partnership, grant number WT-219429/Z/19/Z. The study funder, the Wellcome Trust, which is not for profit charity, supported the acquisition of all the Medtronic Zephyr BioPatch devices needed to conduct the study, whereas it does not have role in the design, its execution, collection, management, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the report including the decision to submit results for publication.This work was supported also by the Italian Ministry of Health with “Current Research funds”.

Statements & declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval

The study protocol adheres to the ethical principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki and the National Health and Medical Research Council statement and was approved by the Ethical Committee of Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Rome, Italy (2260_OPBG_2020).

Consent to participate

All participants and their parents or caregivers will be required to fill in a written consent form, where the methods, advantages and disadvantages in taking part to the experiment will be explained. The study participation will not impose any risks for patients and will not affect in any way the clinical path of the recruited patients, as they will continue to receive their usual diabetes care, and they will continue to manage diabetes as usual. The trial is registered in the clinicaltrial.gov registry (ID: NCT03936634) and will be performed in accordance with the approved guidelines and regulations of the institution.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Footnotes

1

An Assessment of the Zephyr BioPatch and Its Ability to Monitor Patient Position | Smart Patients. https://www.smartpatients.com/trials/NCT02548624., Performance Assessment of a Remote Patient Monitoring Device - ICH GCP - Clinical Trials Registry. https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02570906.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Soltesz G, Patterson C, Dahlquist G, Group ES. Worldwide childhood type 1 diabetes incidence–what can we learn from epidemiology? Pediatr Diabetes. 2007;8:6–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2007.00280.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.JL CR Incidence of type 1 diabetes mellitus in children: results from the population registry of the Madrid Region, 1997–2005. Med Clin. 2009;132(14):545–8. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2008.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Patterson CC, Harjutsalo V, Rosenbauer J, Neu A, Cinek O, Skrivarhaug T, et al. Trends and cyclical variation in the incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes in 26 european centres in the 25 year period 1989–2013: a multicentre prospective registration study. Diabetologia. 2019;62(3):408–17. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4763-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cooke DW, Plotnick L. Type 1 diabetes mellitus in pediatrics. pediatr Rev. 2008;29(11):374–84. doi: 10.1542/pir.29-11-374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.White NH. Long-term outcomes in youths with diabetes mellitus. Pediatr Clin. 2015;62(4):889–909. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2015.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nathan DM, Group DER. The diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study at 30 years: overview. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(1):9–16. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ziegler R, Heidtmann B, Hilgard D, Hofer S, Rosenbauer J, Holl R, et al. Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2011;12(1):11–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00650.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wagner J, Malchoff C, Abbott G. Invasiveness as a barrier to self-monitoring of blood glucose in diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005;7(4):612–9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2005.7.612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Al Hayek AA, Robert AA, Al Dawish MA. Evaluation of FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system on glycemic control, health-related quality of life, and fear of hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes. Clin Med Insights: Endocrinol Diabetes. 2017;10:1179551417746957. doi: 10.1177/1179551417746957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bailey T, Bode BW, Christiansen MP, Klaff LJ, Alva S. The performance and usability of a factory-calibrated flash glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17(11):787–94. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Damiano ER, McKeon K, El-Khatib FH, Zheng H, Nathan DM, Russell SJ. A comparative effectiveness analysis of three continuous glucose monitors: the Navigator, G4 platinum, and Enlite. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014;8(4):699–708. doi: 10.1177/1932296814532203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fokkert M, Van Dijk P, Edens M, Abbes S, De Jong D, Slingerland R, et al. Performance of the FreeStyle Libre Flash glucose monitoring system in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus. BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care. 2017;5(1):e000320. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Beck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K, Ahmann A, Bergenstal R, Haller S, et al. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections: the DIAMOND randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317(4):371–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ajjan RA, Cummings MH, Jennings P, Leelarathna L, Rayman G, Wilmot EG. Accuracy of flash glucose monitoring and continuous glucose monitoring technologies: implications for clinical practice. Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research. 2018;15(3):175–84. doi: 10.1177/1479164118756240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kropff J, Bruttomesso D, Doll W, Farret A, Galasso S, Luijf YM, et al. Accuracy of two continuous glucose monitoring systems: a head-to‐head comparison under clinical research centre and daily life conditions. Diabetes Obes Metabolism. 2015;17(4):343–9. doi: 10.1111/dom.12378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bonora B, Maran A, Ciciliot S, Avogaro A, Fadini G. Head-to-head comparison between flash and continuous glucose monitoring systems in outpatients with type 1 diabetes. J Endocrinol Investig. 2016;39(12):1391–9. doi: 10.1007/s40618-016-0495-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Freckmann G, Link M, Pleus S, Westhoff A, Kamecke U, Haug C. Measurement performance of two continuous tissue glucose monitoring systems intended for replacement of blood glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018;20(8):541–9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Porumb M, Stranges S, Pescapè A, Pecchia L. Precision medicine and artificial intelligence: a pilot study on deep learning for hypoglycemic events detection based on ECG. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–16. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56927-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Porumb M, Griffen C, Hattersley J, Pecchia L. Nocturnal low glucose detection in healthy elderly from one-lead ECG using convolutional denoising autoencoders. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2020;62:102054. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cichosz SL, Frystyk J, Hejlesen OK, Tarnow L, Fleischer J. A novel algorithm for prediction and detection of hypoglycemia based on continuous glucose monitoring and heart rate variability in patients with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014;8(4):731–7. doi: 10.1177/1932296814528838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zanderigo F, Sparacino G, Kovatchev B, Cobelli C. Glucose prediction algorithms from continuous monitoring data: assessment of accuracy via continuous glucose error-grid analysis. SAGE Publications; 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 22.Pappada SM, Cameron BD, Rosman PM, Bourey RE, Papadimos TJ, Olorunto W, et al. Neural network-based real-time prediction of glucose in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(2):135–41. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pappada SM, Cameron BD, Rosman PM. Development of a neural network for prediction of glucose concentration in type 1 diabetes patients. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(5):792–801. doi: 10.1177/193229680800200507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sobel SI, Chomentowski PJ, Vyas N, Andre D, Toledo FG. Accuracy of a novel noninvasive multisensor technology to estimate glucose in diabetic subjects during dynamic conditions. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014;8(1):54–63. doi: 10.1177/1932296813516182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rollins DK, Bhandari N, Kleinedler J, Kotz K, Strohbehn A, Boland L, et al. Free-living inferential modeling of blood glucose level using only noninvasive inputs. J Process Control. 2010;20(1):95–107. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Abraham MB, Jones TW, Naranjo D, Karges B, Oduwole A, Tauschmann M, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Assessment and management of hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19:178–92. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Battelino T, Phillip M, Bratina N, Nimri R, Oskarsson P, Bolinder J. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(4):795–800. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Battelino T, Conget I, Olsen B, Schütz-Fuhrmann I, Hommel E, Hoogma R, et al. The use and efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump therapy: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2012;55(12):3155–62. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2708-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bergenstal RM, Tamborlane WV, Ahmann A, Buse JB, Dailey G, Davis SN, et al. Effectiveness of sensor-augmented insulin-pump therapy in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(4):311–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tamborlane W, Beck R, Bode B, Buckingham B, Chase H, Clemons R, et al. Juvenile diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring Study Group continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(14):1464–76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Frontiers in public health. 2017:258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 32.Singh JP, Larson MG, O’Donnell CJ, Wilson PF, Tsuji H, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Association of hyperglycemia with reduced heart rate variability (the Framingham Heart Study) Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(3):309–12. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00920-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nguyen LL, Su S, Nguyen HT, editors. Identification of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia in type 1 diabetic patients using ECG parameters. 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2012: IEEE. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 34.Nguyen L, Su S, Nguyen HT, editors. Effects of hyperglycemia on variability of RR, QT and corrected QT intervals in Type 1 diabetic patients. 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); 2013: IEEE. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 35.Woldaregay AZ, Årsand E, Botsis T, Albers D, Mamykina L, Hartvigsen G. Data-driven blood glucose pattern classification and anomalies detection: machine-learning applications in type 1 diabetes. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(5):e11030. doi: 10.2196/11030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Laptev D, Ryabykina G, Seid-Guseynov A, Laptev D, Ryabykina G, Seid-Guseinov A, et al. Monitoring of 24-h ECG and glucose level for detection of relations between glycemia and QT interval duration in type 1 diabetics. Ter Arkh. 2009;81(4):28–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Christensen TF, Tarnow L, Randløv J, Kristensen L, Struijk J, Eldrup E, et al. QT interval prolongation during spontaneous episodes of hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: the impact of heart rate correction. Diabetologia. 2010;53(9):2036–41. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1802-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ingerski LM, Modi AC, Hood KK, Pai AL, Zeller M, Piazza-Waggoner C, et al. Health-related quality of life across pediatric chronic conditions. J Pediatr. 2010;156(4):639–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL™ 4.0: Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ Version 4.0 Generic Core Scales in healthy and patient populations. Medical care. 2001:800 – 12. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 40.Blanco-Velasco M, Weng B, Barner KE. ECG signal denoising and baseline wander correction based on the empirical mode decomposition. Comput Biol Med. 2008;38(1):1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2007.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tikkanen P. Nonlinear wavelet and wavelet packet denoising of electrocardiogram signal. Biol Cybern. 1999;80(4):259–67. doi: 10.1007/s004220050523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Haleem MS, Castaldo R, Pagliara SM, Petretta M, Salvatore M, Franzese M, et al. Time adaptive ECG driven cardiovascular disease detector. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2021;70:102968. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Porumb M, Stranges S, Pescapè A, Pecchia L. Precision Medicine and Artificial Intelligence: a Pilot Study on Deep Learning for hypoglycemic events detection based on ECG. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):170. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56927-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Makowski D, Pham T, Lau ZJ, Brammer JC, Lespinasse F, Pham H, et al. NeuroKit2: a Python toolbox for neurophysiological signal processing. Behavior Research Methods. 2021:1–8. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 45.van Gent P, Farah H, van Nes N, van Arem B, HeartPy A novel heart rate algorithm for the analysis of noisy signals. Transp Res part F: traffic Psychol Behav. 2019;66:368–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zimmerman DW. Comparative power of Student t test and Mann-Whitney U test for unequal sample sizes and variances. J Experimental Educ. 1987;55(3):171–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Miller RG Jr. Beyond ANOVA: basics of applied statistics. CRC press; 1997.
  • 48.Mahrishi M, Hiran KK, Meena G, Sharma P. Machine learning and deep learning in real-time applications. IGI global; 2020.
  • 49.Chandrashekar G, Sahin F. A survey on feature selection methods. Comput Electr Eng. 2014;40(1):16–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. Deep learning: MIT press; 2016.
  • 51.Géron A. Hands-on machine learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow: concepts, tools, and techniques to build intelligent systems. O’Reilly Media; 2019.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (60.2KB, docx)

Articles from Health and Technology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES