Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2023 Jan 24;14(4):1000–1006. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03569

Evidence of the Anomalous Fluctuating Magnetic State by Pressure-Driven 4f Valence Change in EuNiGe3

K Chen †,*, C Luo , Y Zhao §, F Baudelet , A Maurya , A Thamizhavel , U K Rößler #, D Makarov , F Radu ‡,*
PMCID: PMC9900636  PMID: 36693119

Abstract

graphic file with name jz2c03569_0006.jpg

In rare-earth compounds with valence fluctuation, the proximity of the 4f level to the Fermi energy leads to instabilities of the charge configuration and the magnetic moment. Here, we provide direct experimental evidence for an induced magnetic polarization of the Eu3+ atomic shell with J = 0, due to intra-atomic exchange and spin–orbital coupling interactions with the Eu2+ atomic shell. By applying external pressure, a transition from antiferromagnetic to a fluctuating behavior in EuNiGe3 single crystals is probed. Magnetic polarization is observed for both valence states of Eu2+ and Eu3+ across the entire pressure range. The anomalous magnetism is discussed in terms of a homogeneous intermediate valence state where frustrated Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya couplings are enhanced by the onset of spin–orbital interaction and engender a chiral spin-liquid-like precursor.


Solid-state systems can undergo electronic transitions leading to intermediate or mixed valencies creating systems of ions with coexisting and, thus, correlated electronic configurations.1 Looking beyond the single ion, the understanding of collective phenomena, like magnetic ordering or superconductivity, in such strongly correlated electronic systems remains a major problem in condensed matter physics.2 If the two coexisting limiting configurations own qualitatively different magnetic states, a long-range ordered magnetic ground state may disappear or be replaced by a hidden or exotic magnetic order. Europium compounds with valence-fluctuating states provide a fruitful realization of such a valence transition. The divalent Eu2+ state with 4f7 (L = 0, S = 7/2, and J = 7/2) has a large pure spin-moment, while the trivalent Eu3+ with 4f6 configuration (L = 3, S = 3, and J = 0) is magnetically invisible. As the energy difference between Eu2+ and Eu3+ valence is not large,3 orbital intermixing can be achieved by applying external pressure or chemical substitution.46 Thus, coexistence of electronic configurations with energy differences in the thermal range can be achieved. By increase of the trivalent Eu at the expense of the divalent Eu, transitions from magnetically ordered to the paramagnetic state are expected, like in Ce and Yb-based materials.7 However, in the transition region the intermediate valency of the magnetic sites and a complex character of the intersite couplings may create novel magnetic behavior, as both are based on a strongly correlated electronic structure.4,8,9

The 4f6 configuration owns a spin-polarization with an identical but oppositely aligned orbital moment, and in addition, the J > 0 excitation of the 4f6-shell gives rise to Van Vleck (para)-magnetism.10 For the collective behavior, it has been theoretically suggested that such Van Vleck ions can contribute with a particular (anisotropic) intersite magnetic exchange,11,12 which could drive a hidden spin-ordering.13 Up to now, observation of hidden magnetic correlations between individual ions with 4f6 or also 5f6 configurations is rare1416 and considered to originate from intersite exchange coupling mechanisms and the presence of a spin-polarized matrix acting on the Van Vleck ions.1418 The admixture of the trivalent Eu also implies a modified orbital structure which could affect the magnetic ordering by atomic exchange and spin–orbital interactions. In this work, we investigate a magnetic europium compound with noncentrosymmetric lattice structure, which allows for the presence of the antisymmetric Dyzaloshinskii–Moriya interactions (DMIs).19,20 Magnetically, the EuNiGe3 exhibits a complex magnetic behavior below the Neel temperature (measured to be 13.2 K, see the Supporting Information), including an incommensurate helicoidal magnetic structure at 3.6 K.31 These couplings cause effective chiral couplings21 that frustrate homogeneous magnetic states and preclude conventional ordering according to the fundamental Landau theory of phase transitions.22 Instead, an intermediate chiral liquid-like or partially ordered state may appear,23,24 as experimentally found in chiral helimagnets like MnSi and FeGe under pressure.25,26

We report on a pressure-induced electronic phase transition in an antiferromagnetic and metallic compound, EuNiGe3,2731 where a change of valence from dominating Eu2+ to an intermediate valence close to Eu2.5+ causes the appearance of a fluctuating magnetic state. This state is anomalous as it displays no magnetically homogeneous long-range order (LRO), but it is not paramagnetic either. Its thermal fluctuations can be characterized and quantified with the model for superparamagnetic (SPM) behavior. We argue that the observation of this unusual magnetism is evidence for a strongly correlated electronic system with partial magnetic order under the influence of chiral magnetic coupling caused by spin–orbit interactions. The tools used to detect the valence transition and the evolution of the fluctuating state are temperature- and pressure-dependent X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) at the Eu L2-edge, which are able to distinguish the polarization of the 5d orbital channels. Complementary to the Van Vleck paramagnetism characteristic for materials containing mainly Eu3+ ions, the polarization of 5d channels of Eu3+ states mirrors the magnetic behavior of Eu2+ under pressure, showing the same transition from AFM to an SPM-like behavior at about 30 GPa. In addition we observe a clear electronic phase transition of the Eu3+ as evidenced by a sudden linewidth change at the critical pressure. Our results provide direct evidence of intra-atomic exchange and spin–orbital interactions between the 5d channels of Eu2+ and Eu3+ contributions, which are essential to be considered when interpreting the physical properties of strongly correlated electronic systems.

The XAS spectra at the Eu L2-edge were taken at T = 8 K for a pressure range up to 48 GPa, as shown in Figure 1a. The quadrupolar (2p-4f) contributions which generally appear at the pre-edge32 were not observed, suggesting that the spectra are dominated by the dipolar contributions (2p1/2-5d3/2). The two contributions, shifted by ∼7.7 eV against each other (dashed lines in Figure 1a), belong to the 5d orbital channels of Eu2+ (4f7) and Eu3+ (4f6) states, respectively. This result, showing the coexistence of Eu2+ and Eu3+ levels, indicates that the valence fluctuation in EuNiGe3 takes place. A decrease of the Eu2+ content with a concomitant increase of the Eu3+ contribution is observed, evidencing the valence increasing under pressure. This valence change can be anticipated to increase as a function of pressure since electrons will be transferred out of the 4f shells into the conduction band.33

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) The XAS of Eu L2-edge at 8 K under pressure up to 48 GPa, and the spectra of P = 1 GPa (b) and 48 GPa (c) fitted with the combination of the spectra of Eu2+ and Eu3+ with Gaussian-type lineshapes (thin solid lines). The dashed curves represent the integral background.

To evaluate the mean values of Eu valence, the spectra are analyzed by assigning Gaussian lineshapes to the Eu2+ and Eu3+ contributions, each with a tanh-type background, as shown in Figure 1b,c for the pressure of 1 and 48 GPa, respectively. The weighted sum, 86% Eu2+ and 14% Eu3+ for 1 GPa and 57% Eu2+ and 43% Eu3+ for 48 GPa, of the simulated curves describes the EuNiGe3 spectrum very well. The Eu mean valence can be derived from ν = 2 + I(Eu3+)/[I(Eu3+) + I(Eu2+)], where I(Eu3+) and I(Eu2+) denote the integrated intensities of the Eu3+ and Eu2+ components. Applying the fitting procedure, the Eu mean valence ν as a function of pressure have been extracted and are shown in Figure 3a. The results suggest that the Eu ion has a lower mean valence of ν = 2.13(3) at T = 8 K and 1 GPa and a much higher value of ν = 2.43(3) when the pressure increases to 48 GPa. The value at low pressure is in good agreement with the literature report ν = 2.09.34 A substantial enhancement of ν can be seen up to 48 GPa, except for P < 10 GPa below which a nearly constant value of ∼2.13(3) is preserved. This is in agreement with previous results showing no valence change up to 8 GPa according to the electrical resistivity measurements of EuNiGe3.9

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Eu mean valence ν (a), the normalized XMCD intensity (b) with a nonuniform behavior, and the relative magnetic contribution from 5d channel of Eu3+, A3+/(A2+ + A3+) (c), obtained as a function of the pressure at μ0H = 1.4 T and T = 8 K up to 48 GPa.

The L2-edge XMCD spectra from the dipolar transition (2p65d0 → 2p55d1) reflect the polarization of the 5d empty-state orbitals in the conduction band. The pressure-dependent Eu L2-edge XMCD spectra and their line shape analysis (fwhm and energy position), which were recorded at T = 8 K and μ0H = 1.4 T and normalized to the XAS intensity, are presented in Figure 2a. Similar to the XAS, two well-defined peaks in the L2 transitions from Eu2+ and Eu3+ channels are clearly present in the XMCD spectra and are drastically affected by pressure. This undoubtedly indicates that the Eu 5d orbital are magnetically polarized in both Eu2+ and Eu3+ channels. The magnetic contribution from both channels can be well separated as shown in Figure 2b,c for pressure of 1 and 48 GPa, respectively. The area of the two peaks from Eu2+ and Eu3+ electronic states are denoted as A2+ and A3+, respectively, to further investigate the pressure dependence of the magnetic polarization from different 5d orbital channels. The peak positions of the XMCD spectra are slightly below the XANES peaks, similar to other Eu- and Sm-based fluctuating-valence materials of EuN,15 EuNi2P2,35 Sm1–xGdxAl2,36 and SmB6.37 Moreover, through line shape analysis of the Eu2+ and Eu3+ resonances we observe that their resonant energy positions exhibit a linear dependence as a function of pressure, as shown in Figure 2d. They show a pressure-induced compression effect as the their energy difference diminishes from ∼9.9 eV at the lowest pressure of 1 GPa to ∼8.3 eV at the highest pressure of 48 GPa. During this compression, the full width at half-maximum (fwhm) reveals the occurrence of an electronic phase transition. While the fwhm of Eu2+ resonance remains unchanged for the whole pressure range, the fwhm of Eu3+ resonance exhibits a sudden increase at 30 GPa, from about 3 eV to about 6 eV. This electronic phase transition leads naturally to a strong enhancement of spin–orbital interactions due to the activation of a large orbital momentum characteristic of the Eu3+ electronic state.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Pressure-dependent Eu L2-edge XMCD spectra of bulk EuNiGe3 up to 48 GPa at T = 8 K and μ0H = 1.4 T, normalized to the XAS intensity, and the XMCD spectra at P = 1 (b) and 48 GPa (c) fits with the combination of the spectra of Eu2+ and Eu3+ with asymmetric double sigmoidal-type lineshapes. (d) Resonances peak position as a function of pressure, showing a pressure-induced compression effect. (e) The fwhm for the Eu2+ and Eu3+. At the critical pressure the fwhm of Eu3+ resonance exhibits a significant change, demonstrating the occurrence of a pressure-induced electronic phase transition.

The normalized XMCD intensity of A = A2+ + A3+ (Figure 3b) shows a completely different behavior when compared to the mean valence value. It remains unchanged up to 10 GPa (region I) and is slightly decreasing (10%) from 10 to 30 GPa (region II), followed by a sharp enhancement from 30 to 40 GPa (region III) with a factor of 3, and it finally dropped from 42 to 48 GPa (region IV). The slightly reduced magnetization in region II indicates the continuous increase of the Néel temperature for moderate pressure after 8 GPa.9 The jump of the macroscopic magnetization observed in region III clearly demonstrates the transition from AFM to a new magnetic phase at ∼30 GPa with a mean valence value of ν = 2.30. Following the increase of ν above 10 GPa, the magnetic contribution from Eu3+ increases from 0.10 at ∼10 GPa to 0.20 at ∼48 GPa, as shown in Figure 3c. This demonstrates that a stronger cumulative spin and orbital magnetic contribution from the Eu3+ state correlates with a higher Eu3+ occupation in EuNiGe3 under pressure.

The magnetic contributions from Ni sites are negligible as probed by in situ high-pressure XAS and XMCD measured at the Ni K-edge up to 45.5 GPa, shown in Figures S6 and Figure S7 in the Supporting Information. Besides, there is no structural phase transition observed up to 57 GPa, as demonstrated by the in situ high-pressure X-ray diffraction results shown in Figure S8.

In addition to the large enhancement of the Eu magnetic polarization under pressure P > 30.0 GPa, an onset of a specific change of magnetic behavior is observed according to the field dependence of the XMCD intensity of Eu2+ at P = 32.0 and 34.5 GPa, as shown in Figure 4a. The profile of the XMCD spectra does not change with the field, suggesting the same magnetic behavior of the 5d channels from Eu2+ and Eu3+. The saturation tendency and the S-shape magnetic hysteresis loop indicates the onset of a thermally activated dynamics of the magnetic state above 30 GPa. By contrast, an almost linear curve is observed for P = 15.0 GPa in the AFM state, which is the ground state of the EuNiGe3 at ambient pressure.9 For simplicity, we analyze this anomalous behavior in terms of an SPM model by fitting the field-dependent XMCD with a Brillouin function.38 Note that the SPM model is most popular for the analysis of nanoparticles, whose magnetization can randomly flip direction within their characteristic relaxation times. However, short-range correlated spins may exhibit similar characteristic dynamics in magnetic systems. In particular, dense spin- or magnetic cluster-glasses, spin-density-wave order under random exchange or random-field, or other glassy magnetic systems do show such a behavior.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Field-dependent XMCD intensity of Eu, obtained at T = 8 K under pressure of 15.0, 32.0, and 34.5 GPa (a), and at T = 8, 16, and 27 K under pressure of 34.5 GPa (b). The lines are superparamagnetic fittings with Brillouin function.

The first scenario includes ferromagnetic correlation that is available in the magnetic ground state. In our case, the ground state is antiferromagnetic; therefore, dipolar interactions and an eventual percolation threshold cannot be supported. For the second scenario, a transition from spin density waves to a glassy behavior would require a breaking symmetry mechanism which involves impurities and/or random exchange fields. This can also be excluded, because the EuNiGe3 is a single crystal (no impurities) and the ground state is antiferromagnetic (no random fields). Similar arguments applied also for the third scenario. Instead, as we mentioned above, the EuNiGe3 crystal exhibits a noncentrosymmetric lattice structure, which allows for the presence of the antisymmetric DMIs.19,20 Then it is reasonable that a pressure-driven transition that involves valence fluctuations (Eu2+/Eu3+) under the presence of symmetry-breaking interactions causes a transition from AFM to an unconventional superparamgnetic state. This reflects short-range interaction of spins that are characterized by an effective magnetic moment which fluctuates with a paramagnetic long-range character.

Considering that the fluctuations are described by an effective moment, it defines the curvature of the field-dependent magnetization as a parameter. For 32.0 GPa, an equivalent of 4 magnetic Eu2+ states reproduce the data, whereas at 34.5 GPa an average number of 6.5 elemental moments result from the fitting to the data. These numbers, which reflect the ordered spins, are significantly higher as compared to a simple paramagnetic behavior where one magnetic atom would define the magnetization character. Corroborated also by the enhanced magnetization from 30.0 to 42.0 GPa (Figure 3c) one can suggest that the short-range magnetic interactions are strengthened by the lattice contraction, similar to that observed in EuX (X = Te, Se, S, O) monochalcogenides8 and Eu0.5Yb0.5Ga4.4 For a consistency check of the SPM behavior at high pressure, we plot in Figure 4b the XMCD dependence as a function of field for three different temperatures measured at 34.5 GPa. These curves also show the effect of enhanced thermally fluctuating moments by the change of curvature with the typical thermally activated SPM-like dynamics.

The paramagnetic behavior of EuNiGe3 at ambient pressure and above the Néel temperature is confirmed according to the temperature-dependent magnetic moments as shown in Figure 5a. For each temperature the XMCD has been measured at Eu M4,5-edges in an external field of μ0H = ± 8 T applied along the c-axis of the crystal. The magnetic moments have been retrieved through the sum rules39 analysis applied to the XMCD spectra (not shown). The line in Figure 5a represents a plot of the Brillouin function for parameters characteristic to a divalent Eu. The agreement between the model and the measured magnetic moment as a function of temperature confirms the paramagnetic behavior of the magnetization above the ordering temperature. Below the Néel temperature, the hysteresis loop at T = 8 K (inset of Figure 5a) confirms its AFM ground state at low temperatures. In Figure 5b we show the XMCD intensity (at the L2 edge) of Eu2+ as well as Eu3+ which were recorded under P = 48.0 GPa for an external field of μ0H = 1.4 T and for temperatures ranging from 8 to 250 K. The normalized values of A2+,3+(T)/A2+,3+(8 K) deviate significantly from the ideal paramagnetic behavior, confirming an SPM character. Also, the XMCD intensity of the Eu3+ follows closely the behavior of Eu2+, which suggests a strong intra-atomic exchange interaction in the valence-fluctuating EuNiGe3.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) Temperature dependence of the magnetic moment of Eu at ambient pressure. The line represents a plot of the Brillouin function for parameters characteristic to the divalent Eu. Inset: AFM-type hysteresis loop measured at 8 K. (b) Eu2+ and Eu3+ XMCD intensities (normalized to the value of 8K) measured at L2-edge (solid and open circles) obtained at P = 48.0 GPa from 8 to 250 K, and the line is a guide to the eyes. Inset: field-dependent XMCD intensity of Eu2+.

The mechanism of the SPM-like state correlates with the onset of the electronic phase transition which leads to the onset of the spin–orbit coupling trough populating the Eu3+ electronic state. EuNiGe3 has an acentric polar crystal structure (of BaNiSn3 structure-type: space group I4mm, No. 107) which causes the appearance of frustrated chiral Dzaloshinskii–Moriya interactions (DMIs)21 that are enhanced by the onset of the orbital moment of the Eu3+ at the transition pressure. This mechanism is present in EuNiGe3 by symmetry, and an unconventional transition from AFM to another magnetic LRO or the paramagnetic state is expected to display an intermediate or meso-phase with fluctuating larger magnetic units than the paramagnetic ions. The chiral DMIs are always present; thus, they are active also in the homogeneous intermediate valence state, where the on-site fluctuations between 4f7 and 4f6 configurations are so fast that magnetic properties are determined by the magnetic moments of a smeared state with fractional valence on site and its intersite exchange.

To conclude, element and orbital selective XAS and XMCD measurements on Eu L2 absorption edges under pressures up to 48.0 GPa show a prominent valence change in EuNiGe3 from Eu2+ toward Eu3+ as a function of pressure. Both the 5d channels of the Eu2+ and Eu3+ contributions are magnetically polarized, and an electronic phase transition is observed at 30 GPa as a sudden increase of the resonance line width of the Eu3+. Concomitantly, a magnetic transition to an anomalous state of slow and large thermal fluctuating moments is observed. The chiral magnetic exchange and a precursor state is identified as the underlying mechanism for this anomalous state. In EuNiGe3, the 5d orbital channels of Eu3+ has J = 0 ground state and therefore is not responsive to the applied magnetic field. The polarization of 5d orbital channels of Eu3+, which is intimately bound to that of Eu2+ for all temperature and pressure ranges, suggests intra-atomic exchange interactions to the Eu2+ in valence-fluctuating EuNiGe3. Such strong intra-atomic exchange and spin–orbit interactions need to be considered for future theoretical investigations of Eu- and other rare earth-based materials with a valence fluctuating state.

Methods

Single crystals of EuNiGe3 were grown by using a high-temperature solution growth method with In as a solvent, as described in more details in refs (30, 40, and 41). The XAS and XMCD spectra at the Eu L2-edge and Ni K-edge have been measured at the ODE beamline42 at synchrotron-SOLEIL, France to probe the pressure-dependent local electronic configuration and 5d magnetism of Eu ions. Micrometer-sized powders ground from a high-quality single-crystal EuNiGe3, together with the pressure-transmitting medium silicon oil, was pressurized up to 48 GPa in a diamond-anvil cell. The pressure was measured using a ruby fluorescence scale. XMCD spectra were obtained through the difference of XAS spectra measured under the magnetic field up to μ0H = 1.4 T, applied parallel or antiparallel to the beam helicity. The XMCD at the Eu M-edges were measured at the VEKMAG end-station43 installed at the PM2 beamline of the synchrotron facility BESSY II, under external magnetic fields up to μ0H = 8 T applied along the c-axis of the single crystal. The in situ high-pressure X-ray diffraction measurement was performed with an angle-dispersive synchrotron X-ray diffraction mode (AD-XRD) at the BL04 beamline of the ALBA.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Synchrotron Soleil, HZB, and ALBA for provision of synchrotron radiation facilities. Financial support for developing and building the PM2-VEKMAG beamline and VEKMAG end-station was provided by HZB and BMBF (Grant Nos. 05K10PC2, 05K10WR1,and 05K10KE1), respectively. F.R. acknowledges funding by the German Research Foundation via Project No. SPP2137/RA 3570. S. Rudorff is acknowledged for technical support.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03569.

  • Details of the preparation of EuNiGe3 single crystal under investigation and its anisotropic magnetic properties in ambient pressure conditions; element-specific XMCD measurements for Eu and Ni, utilizing soft X-ray spectroscopy at the ambient pressure; high-pressure XMCD at Ni K-edge; and high-pressure X-ray diffraction results (PDF)

Author Contributions

K.C. and F.R. conceived and designed the projects; K.C., F.B., and F.R. performed the experiments. A.M. and A.T. prepared the single-crystal samples. K.C., F.R., U.K.R., and D.M. co-wrote the paper. All the authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

jz2c03569_si_001.pdf (938.5KB, pdf)

References

  1. Riseborough P. S.; Lawrence J. M. Mixed valent metals. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2016, 79, 084501. 10.1088/0034-4885/79/8/084501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Khomskii D. I. The problem of intermediate valency. Sov. Phys. Usp. 1979, 22, 879. 10.1070/PU1979v022n11ABEH005645. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauminger E. R.; Froindlich D.; Nowik I.; Ofer S.; Felner I.; Mayer I. Charge Fluctuations in Europium in Metallic EuCu2Si2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1973, 30, 1053. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.1053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Loula G. D.; dos Reis R. D.; Haskel D.; Garcia F.; Souza-Neto N. M.; Gandra F. C. G. High-pressure tuning of valence and magnetic interactions in Eu0.5Yb0.5Ga4. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 245128. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.245128. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Paramanik U. B.; Bar A.; Das D.; Caroca-Canales N.; Prasad R.; Geibel C.; Hossain Z. Valence fluctuation and magnetic ordering in EuNi2(P1–xGex)2 single crystals. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2016, 28, 166001. 10.1088/0953-8984/28/16/166001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Onuki Y.; Nakamura A.; Honda F.; Aoki D.; Tekeuchi T.; Nakashima M.; Amako Y.; Harima H.; Matsubayashi K.; Uwatoko Y.; et al. Divalent, trivalent, and heavy fermion states in Eu compounds. Philos. Mag. 2017, 97, 3399. 10.1080/14786435.2016.1218081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gegenwart P.; Si Q.; Steglich F. Quantum criticality in heavy-fermion metals. Nat. Phys. 2008, 4, 186–197. 10.1038/nphys892. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Souza-Neto N. M.; Haskel D.; Tseng Y.-C.; Lapertot G. Pressure-Induced Electronic Mixing and Enhancement of Ferromagnetic Ordering in EuX (X= Te, Se, S, O) Magnetic Semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 057206. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.057206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Uchima K.; Arakaki N.; Hirakawa S.; Hiranaka Y.; Uejo T.; Teruya A.; Nakamura A.; Takeda M.; Takaesu Y.; Hedo M.; et al. Pressure Effect on Transport Properties of EuNiGe3. JPS Conf. Proc. 2014, 1, 012015. 10.7566/JPSCP.1.012015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Van Vleck J. H.The Theory of Electric and Magnetic Susceptibilities; Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1932. [Google Scholar]
  11. Huang N. L.; Van Vleck J. H. Effect of the Anisotropic Exchange and the Crystalline Field on the Magnetic Susceptibility of Eu2O3. J. Appl. Phys. 1969, 40, 1144. 10.1063/1.1657569. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Palermo L.; Da Silva X. A. Magnetic Behavior of van Vleck Ions and an Electron Gas Interacting by Exchange. phys. stat. sol. (b) 1980, 102, 661. 10.1002/pssb.2221020227. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Johannes M. D.; Pickett W. E. Magnetic coupling between nonmagnetic ions: Eu3+ in EuN and EuP. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, 195116. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.195116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Magnani N.; Caciuffo R.; Wilhelm F.; Colineau E.; Eloirdi R.; Griveau J.-C.; Rusz J.; Oppeneer P. M.; Rogalev A.; Lander G. H. Magnetic polarization of the Americium J = 0 Ground State in AmFe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 097203. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.097203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Le Binh D.; Ruck B. J.; Natali F.; Warring H.; Trodahl H. J.; Anton E.-M.; Meyer C.; Ranno L.; Wilhelm; Rogalev A. Europium Nitride: A Novel Diluted Magnetic Semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111, 167206. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.167206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Skaugen A.; Schierle E.; van der Laan G.; Shukla D. K.; Walker H. C.; Weschke E.; Strempfer J. Long-range antiferromagnetic order of formally nonmagnetic Eu3+ Van Vleck ions observed in multiferroic Eu1–xYxMnO3. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 180409. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.180409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Takikawa Y.; Ebisu S.; Nagata S. Van Vleck paramagnetism of the trivalent Eu ions. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2010, 71, 1592–1598. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2010.08.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ruck B. J.; Trodahl H. J.; Richter J. H.; Cezar J. C.; Wilhelm F.; Rogalev A.; Antonov V. N.; Le B. D.; Meyer C. Magnetic state of EuN: X-ray magnetic circular dichroism at the Eu M4,5 and L2,3 absorption edges. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 174404. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.174404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dzyaloshinsky I. A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1958, 4, 241–255. 10.1016/0022-3697(58)90076-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Moriya T. Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. 1960, 120, 91. 10.1103/PhysRev.120.91. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dzyaloshinskii I. Theory of helicoidal structures in antiferromagnets. Sov. Phys. JETP 1964, 19, 960. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tolédano J. C.; Tolédano P.. The Landau theory of phase transitions; World Scientific, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wilhelm H.; Baenitz M.; Schmidt M.; Rößler U. K.; Leonov A. A.; Bogdanov A. N. Precursor Phenomena at the Magnetic Ordering of the Cubic Helimagnet FeGe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 127203. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.127203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rößler U. K.; Bogdanov A. N.; Pfleiderer C. Spontaneous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals. Nature 2006, 442 (7104), 797–801. 10.1038/nature05056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pfleiderer C.; Reznik D.; Pintschovius L.; von Löhneysen H.; Garst M. H.; Rosch A. Partial order in the non-Fermi-liquid phase of MnSi. Nature 2004, 427 (6971), 227–231. 10.1038/nature02232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Barla A.; Wilhelm H.; Forthaus M. K.; Strohm C.; Rüffer R.; Schmidt M.; Koeprnik K.; Rößler U. K.; Abd-Elmeguid M. M. Pressure-Induced Inhomogeneous Chiral-Spin Ground State in FeGe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 016803. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.016803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Goetsch R. J.; Anand V. K.; Johnston D. C. Antiferromagnetism in EuNiGe3. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 064406. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.064406. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Maurya A.; Bonville P.; Thamizhavel A.; Dhar S. K. Enhanced conduction band density of states in intermetallic EuTSi3 (T = Rh, Ir). J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2015, 27, 366001. 10.1088/0953-8984/27/36/366001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Fabreges X.; Gukasov A.; Bonville P.; Maurya A.; Thamizhavel A.; Dhar S. K. Exploring metamagnetism of single crystalline EuNiGe3 by neutron scattering. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 214414. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.214414. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Maurya A.; Bonville P.; Thamizhavel A.; Dhar S. K. EuNiGe3, An anisotropic antiferromagnet. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2014, 26, 216001. 10.1088/0953-8984/26/21/216001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ryan D. H.; Cadogan J. M.; Rejali R.; Boyer C. D. Complex incommensurate helicoidal magnetic ordering of EuNiGe3. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2016, 28, 266001. 10.1088/0953-8984/28/26/266001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Souza-Neto N. M.; Haskel D.; dos Reis R. D.; Gandra F. C. G. Combining state-of-the-art experiment and ab-initio calculations for a better understanding of the interplay between valence, magnetism and structure in Eu compounds at high pressure. High Pressure Res. 2016, 36, 360–370. 10.1080/08957959.2016.1212025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Debessai M.; Matsuoka T.; Hamlin J. J.; Schilling J. S.; Shimizu K. Pressure-Induced Superconducting State of Europium Metal at Low Temperatures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 197002. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.197002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Utsumi Y.; Kasinathan D.; Swatek P.; Bednarchuk O.; Kaczorowski D.; Ablett J. M.; Rueff J.-P. Bulk electronic structure of non-centrosymmetric EuTGe3 (T= Co, Ni, Rh, Ir) studied by hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 115155. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.115155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Matsuda Y. H.; Ouyang Z. W.; Nojiri H.; Inami T.; Ohwada K.; Suzuki M.; Kawamura N.; Mitsuda A.; Wada H. X-Ray Magnetic Circular Dichroism of a Valence Fluctuating State in Eu at High Magnetic Fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 046402. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.046402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Bersweiler M.; Dumesnil K.; Wilhelm F.; Rogalev A. Magnetic control of the zero-magnetization ferromagnet Sm1–xGdxAl2. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 054411. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.054411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Chen K.; Weng T.-C.; Schmerber G.; Gurin V. N.; Kappler J.-P.; Kong Q.; Baudelet F.; Polian A.; Nataf L. Surface- and pressure-induced bulk Kondo breakdown in SmB6. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 235153. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.235153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jensen J.; Mackintosh A.. Rare Earth Magnetism: Structures and Excitations; Clarendon Press, 1991; ISBN 9780198520276. [Google Scholar]
  39. Thole B. T.; Carra P.; Sette F.; van der Laan G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 68, 1943–1946. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kumar N.; Dhar S. K.; Thamizhavel A.; Bonville P.; Manfrinetti P. Magnetic properties of EuPtSi3 single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 81, 144414. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.144414. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kumar N.; Das P. K.; Kulkarni R.; Thamizhavel A.; Dhar S. K.; Bonville P. Antiferromagnetic ordering in EuPtGe3. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2012, 24, 036005. 10.1088/0953-8984/24/3/036005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Baudelet F.; Nataf L.; Torchio R. New scientific opportunities for high pressure research by energy-dispersive XMCD. High Pressure Res. 2016, 36, 429–444. 10.1080/08957959.2016.1211274. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Noll T.; Radu F.. Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Design of Synchrotron Radiation Equipment and Instrumentation Conference (MEDSI’16), 2016, Barcelona, Spain (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2017); pp 370–373. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jz2c03569_si_001.pdf (938.5KB, pdf)

Articles from The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES