Abstract
Pathogenic viral infections represent a major challenge to human health. Host immune responses to respiratory viruses are closely associated with microbiome and metabolism via the gut-lung axis. It has been known that host defense against influenza A virus (IAV) involves activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, however, mechanisms behind the protective function of NLRP3 are not fully known. Here we show that an isolated bacterial strain, Bifidobacterium pseudolongum NjM1, enriched in the gut microbiota of Nlrp3−/− mice, protects wild-type but not Nlrp3 deficient mice against IAV infection. This effect depends on the enhanced production of type I interferon (IFN-I) mediated by NjM1-derived acetate. Application of exogenous acetate reproduces the protective effect of NjM1. Mechanistically, NLRP3 bridges GPR43 and MAVS, and promotes the oligomerization and signalling of MAVS; while acetate enhances MAVS aggregation upon GPR43 engagement, leading to elevated IFN-I production. Thus, our data support a model of NLRP3 mediating enhanced induction of IFN-I via acetate-producing bacterium and suggest that the acetate-GPR43-NLRP3-MAVS-IFN-I signalling axis is a potential therapeutic target against respiratory viral infections.
Subject terms: Innate immunity, Microbiome, Influenza virus, Inflammasome
The NLRP3 inflammasome plays a pivotal role in clearing viral respiratory infection, but the molecular mechanism is not fully known. Here authors show that acetate, produced by gut bacteria, may enhance NLRP3-mediated type I interferon production following influenza infection in mice.
Introduction
Respiratory viral infection such as COVID-19 represents a major challenge to human health. Epidemics and pandemics caused by influenza A virus (IAV) infection are also major global threats. During IAV infection, the surface glycoprotein haemagglutinins (HA) of virions bind to host receptors first, then endocytosis mediates virus entry1,2. After entry, viral ribonucleoproteins (vRNP) and other proteins are synthesized and assembled into progeny virions to release and spread in the lung3, which may cause lethality resulting from compromised virus clearance or deleterious immunopathology4.
Epithelial cells in the respiratory epithelium are the main target cells for IAV replication5, while innate immune cells such as macrophages and neutrophils are key components for sensing IAV infection and inhibiting virus early after infection6. In macrophages, multiple pattern recognition receptors (PRR) are engaged to initiate innate immune responses7. These include Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) sensing the viral single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) in the endosome6,8, Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) sensing the viral double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in the phagosome6,9, and RIG-I-MAVS (retionoic acid-inducible gene I-mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein) sensing 5′-triphosphated viral RNA in the cytosol6. Recognition of IAV by these PRRs initiates the production of type I IFN (IFN-I) through the phosphorylation of IFN regulatory factors 3 and 7 (IRF3 and IRF7)6. Through interferon receptor, IFN-I induces multiple interferon-stimulated genes (ISG) to control virus replication10, which is the most fundamental mechanism for viral containment by mammalian hosts.
Of note, anti-viral IFN-I response can be attributed to gut microbiota. Recent work showed that microbiota-induced IFN-I production by plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) controls a distinct transcriptional, epigenetic, and metabolic basal state of conventional dendritic cells (cDC) to enhance anti-pathogen immune responses11. Outer membrane (OM)-associated lipooligosaccharide (LOS) of Bacteroides fragilis induces expression of IFN-β via TLR4-TRIF signaling in colonic cDCs to protect against vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and IAV infections12. In addition, the microbial metabolite desaminotyrosine (DAT), produced by Clostridium orbiscindens, also protects against IAV infection through the augmentation of IFN-I signaling13. In addition to IFN-I induction, microbiota-derived butyrate dampens deleterious immunopathology during IAV infection4.
Both IFN-I dependent virus clearance and adequate control of immunopathology are necessary to protect against IAV infection. As such, the role of NLRP3 (NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing 3) in host response to IAV infection is intriguing. As the most studied inflammasome sensor protein, the major role of NLRP3 is to assemble ASC (apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD) and caspase-1 to form inflammasome complex, which results in caspase-1 activation14. Activated caspase-1 cleaves pro-interleukin-1β (pro-IL-1β), pro-interleukin-18 (pro-IL-18), as well as Gasdermin-D, leading to the secretion of mature IL-1β/IL-18 and pyroptosis15. A number of studies showed that deficiency of NLRP3 led to more severe disease16,17, and rescued or enhanced NLRP3 activity resulted in resistance to IAV infection18,19. These results indicate that NLRP3 is essential for the host to defeat IAV infection, however, the mechanisms behind remain largely elusive. Especially, whether the protective effect from NLRP3 involves gut microbiota-dependent type I IFN production has not been studied.
Here, we investigate the mechanisms associated with the role of NLRP3 in mediating gut microbiota-derived acetate-enhanced induction of IFN-I. We show that acetate enhances viral RNA-induced MAVS aggregation, IRF3 phosphorylation and type I IFN production; wherein NLRP3 mediates acetate-enhanced induction of IFN-I by interacting with the acetate receptor GPR43 (G-protein coupled receptor 43) and MAVS. Our findings indicate that microbiota-derived acetate enhances host antiviral response via NLRP3 thus protection against IAV infection, which may provide a base for designing intervention strategies against respiratory viral infections.
Results
Commensal microbiota from Nlrp3−/− mice enhances host defense against influenza A virus infection in WT animals
To test the possibility that NLRP3-dependent host defense against IAV infection may involve commensal microbiota, we co-housed Nlrp3−/− and WT mice at a 1:1 ratio from weaning to adulthood to exchange their microbiota, and then infected these mice with IAV. Consistent with previous reports, we found that influenza A virus (IAV) PR8 (H1N1) strain induced much more severe disease in Nlrp3−/− mice than their wild-type (WT) companions (Fig. 1a). Unexpectedly, Co-housed WT (Co-WT) mice showed enhanced defense against influenza virus infection compared with singly housed WT (Single-WT) mice, while Co-housed Nlrp3−/− mice (Co-Nlrp3−/−) showed unchanged susceptibility (Fig. 1a). This suggested that WT mice obtained IAV-resistant bacteria from Nlrp3−/− mice after co-housing, which failed to function in Co- and Single-Nlrp3−/− mice due to the absence of Nlrp3 gene.
To test whether the augmented defense of Co-WT mice was mediated by commensal bacteria, those four groups of mice were given antibiotics in drinking water during co-housing before IAV infection. As expected, the difference between Co-WT and Single-WT mice disappeared (Fig. 1b), which indicated that it was the special IAV-resistant bacteria that WT mice obtained from Nlrp3−/− mice during co-housing that enhanced host defense against IAV infection.
We then sequenced the 16S rRNA gene V3–V4 regions of the fecal bacteria and found that the overall structure of the gut microbiota showed a striking difference between Single-WT and Single-Nlrp3−/− mice, while it was converged between Co-WT and Co-Nlrp3−/− mice after co-housing (Fig. 1c). Next, we set out to identify the specific bacteria that enhanced Co-WT defense against IAV infection. First, we identified the amplicon sequence variants (ASV) that were significantly altered between Single-Nlrp3−/− mice and Single-WT mice using the algorithm LDA Effect Size (LEfSe) v1.020. Notably, fifty-one ASVs were depleted in single-Nlrp3−/− mice, but twenty-five ASVs were enriched, especially ASV4 in the family Bifidobacteriaceae and ASV1 in the family Muribaculaceae (Fig. 1d). Then, we found that nineteen ASVs including ASV4 and ASV1 were enriched in Co-WT mice after co-housing with Co-Nlrp3−/− mice, while six ASVs were depleted in Co-WT mice (Fig. 1e). At last, we identified seven ASVs that were enriched and three ASVs that were depleted in Co-WT mice due to co-housing with Co-Nlrp3−/− mice, especially ASV4 and ASV1 (Fig. 1f, g).
To obtain their pure cultures, we performed sequence-guided screening of bacterium colonies from fresh feces of singly housed Nlrp3−/− mice. A pure culture was obtained using a previously reported mGAM medium (Nissui 05426). We named this strain as NjM1, which contains 4 copies of the 16S rRNA gene in its genome and had 100% identity with ASV4, which were enriched in Co-WT mice but not Single-WT mice (Fig. 1g, h and Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). According to whole 16S rRNA gene sequence, the nearest neighbor of NjM1 in GenBank is Bifidobacterium pseudolongum subsp. globosum strain RU224 with 97.96–98.42% homology (Fig. 1h), indicating that the strain NjM1 is belonged in Bifidobacterium pseudolongum. B. pseudolongum NjM1 grows fast to plateau stage 8 hours after inoculation under anaerobic culture condition (Supplementary Fig. 1c), and bacteria cultured under this condition was applied for functional experiments. Taken together, microbiota from Nlrp3−/− mice enhances host defense against influenza A virus infection in WT animals, and the gut microbiota of Nlrp3−/− mice contains abundant B. pseudolongum NjM1, which is associated enhanced protection against IAV in Co-WT but not Nlrp3−/− mice.
Elevated levels of microbial metabolite acetate associates with B. pseudolongum NjM1 that produces acetic acid
To find out metabolites that may have been increased in WT mice after co-housing with Nlrp3−/− mice which possibly enhanced defense against IAV infection, orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was carried out for 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectral data obtained from feces samples. The results suggested that metabolomes of feces from Co-WT mice differed markedly from those of Single-WT mice (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Data 1). Co-housing with Nlrp3−/− mice caused marked elevations of the acetate and butyrate levels and reduction in trimethylamine (TMA) in the feces of Co-WT mice (Fig. 2b, c, Supplementary Data 1). High level of acetate was also detected in the feces of Single-Nlrp3−/− mice (Supplementary Fig. 2a-c, Supplementary Data 1). On the other hand, we detected acetate in circulation using peripheral blood and confirmed that acetate in Co-housed WT mice with Nlrp3−/− mice was higher than that in Single-WT mice (Supplementary Fig. 2d). Notably, the isolated B. pseudolongum NjM1 mentioned above, a predominant bacterium in Co-WT mice, was able to produce acetic acid specifically (Fig. 2d), which was closely related to the significantly elevated acetate levels in the feces and circulation of Co-WT mice. These data indicate that B. pseudolongum NjM1 isolated from the gut microbiota of Nlrp3−/− mice may produce acetate in vivo to confer host protection against IAV infection in Co-WT but not Nlrp3−/− animals.
B. pseudolongum NjM1 and acetate protect WT but not Nlrp3−/− mice against IAV infection
We next wondered whether B. pseudolongum NjM1 or its metabolite acetate was able to confer protection against influenza virus challenge. To test these hypotheses, we first inoculated WT mice with B. pseudolongum NjM1 by oral gavage, or with NjM1 conditioned supernatant by intranasal administration before IAV infection. Of note, inoculation of B. pseudolongum NjM1 bacterium or conditioned supernatant both dramatically decreased IAV-induced weight loss and mortality (Fig. 3a, b, Supplementary Fig. 3a). However, the same inoculation of NjM1 and conditioned supernatant didn’t rescue IAV-induced weight loss and mortality in Nlrp3−/− mice (Fig. 3a, b, Supplementary Fig. 3a), suggesting that NLRP3 was required for B. pseudolongum NjM1-mediated protection against IAV infection, consistent with the susceptibility of Nlrp3−/− mice to IAV infection even though they are rich in B. pseudolongum NjM1 in the gut (Fig. 1a, d).
To explore whether acetate itself was sufficient to confer protection against IAV infection, WT mice were given sodium acetate (SA) in drinking water 2 weeks in advance and during IAV infection. The results showed that acetate significantly reduced body weight loss caused by IAV infection and increased the survival rate in WT, but not Nlrp3−/− mice (Fig. 3c), suggesting that treatment with acetate also had a NLRP3-dependent protective effect against IAV. To further assess whether acetate-releasing diet can protect against IAV infection, WT mice were fed specialized diets HAMS (high-amylose maize starch) or HAMSA (acetylated HAMS) that releases large amounts of acetate after bacterial fermentation in the gut as previously described21–24. Indeed, HAMSA-fed mice had higher concentration of acetate in cecal contents, feces and peripheral venous blood than that of HAMS-fed mice (Supplementary Fig. 3e). Of note, acetate-releasing HAMSA significantly reduced body weight loss caused by IAV infection in WT, but not Nlrp3−/− mice (Fig. 3d), suggesting a diet that releases acetate also protected against IAV in a NLRP3-dependent manner. We also tried to treat mice with acetate in the drinking water simultaneously with IAV infection (Supplementary Fig. 3b), or inoculated mice with acetate by intranasal route post-intranasal IAV instillation (Supplementary Fig. 3c). Notably, under these therapeutic protocols, acetate protected mice against weight loss and mortality caused by IAV infection as well (Supplementary Fig. 3b, c). When sodium acetate was added to the drinking water before infection and withdrawn after infection, lower weight loss was evident only at the early stage after IAV instillation, and the effect disappeared later on (Supplementary Fig. 3d). These data demonstrated that as long as the acetate was applied to the mice early enough without being withdrawn, the mice were able to be protected against IAV infection.
When IAV-infected mice were harvested on day 7 post-infection, pathology analysis and viral titration revealed that the reduced body weight loss and increased survival rate in acetate-treated mice associated with decreased inflammatory cell infiltration, as well as reduced viral load (Fig. 3e, f). However, this effect was evident only in the WT mice, but not in mice deficient for Nlrp3 (Fig. 3e, f). Of note, acetate-treated WT mice showed elevated levels of IFN-I in the lung, which was not observed in Nlrp3−/− mice (Fig. 3f). These results implied that acetate may have induced IFN-I production in a NLRP3-dependent manner to contain IAV in the lung.
Acetate protects against IAV infection in an IFNAR1-dependent manner
To investigate whether acetate suppressed IAV replication through IFN-I signaling pathway, Ifnar1−/− mice were subjected to IAV infection after treatment with acetate in drinking water. Of note, the protective effect of acetate observed in WT mice was totally lost in such mice (Supplementary Fig. 4a). No matter treated with acetate or not, all the Ifnar1−/− mice lost body weight quickly and similarly, and died finally (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 4a). Pathological analysis and viral titration showed that both acetate-treated and -untreated mice exhibited obvious inflammatory cell infiltration around the bronchi and blood vessel, as well as high and comparable viral load in the lung (Fig. 4b, c). Although the induction of IFN-I was more or less normal in the Ifnar1−/− mice, interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) such as Isg15 or Oas1a were not induced due to the lack of type I interferon receptor (Supplementary Fig. 4b). These data thus demonstrated that acetate-mediated suppression of IAV infection in vivo was fulfilled through type I interferon signaling.
We next asked which type of host cells were involved in the protective effect of sodium acetate. To this end, we targeted the most abundant innate immune cells in the lung, which are alveolar macrophages6. Clodronate-mediated depletion of alveolar macrophages in the lung showed that once these cells were depleted, there was no difference in weight loss or survival between acetate-treated and the control group anymore (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 4c), suggesting that macrophages play a key role in acetate-enhanced defense against IAV infection.
Acetate controls IAV replication by enhancing IFN-I induction via the MAVS-TBK1-IRF3 axis
The next question we asked was how acetate induces or helps with inducing IFN-I production. We first found that acetate-treated bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) showed clearly reduced IAV replication at 24 h post-infection, as indicated by reduced viral nucleoprotein (NP) protein levels (Fig. 5a) and decreased viral M1 gene expression (Fig. 5b). In addition, the amount of infectious viral particles in the supernatant of BMDMs was also reduced (Fig. 5c). Notably, acetate treatment promoted Ifna1 and Ifnb1 expression in BMDMs at 6 h and 24 h after IAV infection (Fig. 5d). We confirmed that acetate inhibited virus replication through enhancing antiviral immune responses in macrophages, rather than by directly destroying the viral particles, because co-incubating IAV particles with 250 μM acetate (a non-toxic concentration determined by 7AAD staining) for various times in vitro did not affect the infectivity of influenza virus (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b). We also confirmed that sodium was not responsible for enhanced Ifna1 expression and the inhibition of virus replication, as both sodium acetate (SA) and potassium acetate (PA) showed a similar effect, while sodium butyrate (SB) did not (Supplementary Fig. 5e). We further found that acetate treatment enhanced the ability of BMDMs to absorb and endocytose virus particles, as acetate-treated cells bound and endocytosed more virus particles, and fewer were left in the supernatant (Supplementary Fig. 5c, d). Therefore, acetate controlled IAV replication by enhancing IFN-I generation in macrophages.
To investigate the molecular mechanism on IFN-I production promoted by acetate, BMDMs were treated with acetate for 24 h and stimulated with polyinosinicpolycytidylic acid (polyI:C), a structural analog of double-stranded RNA which can functionally mimic IAV RNA to induce IFN-I production (Supplementary Fig. 5f). In such experiment, acetate promoted IFN-I production significantly (Fig. 5e and Supplementary Fig. 5g), for which sodium was not responsible, because both sodium acetate (SA) and potassium acetate (PA) showed similar effect, while sodium butyrate (SB) did not (Supplementary Fig. 5h). As IFN-I induction is largely dependent on interferon regulatory factors (IRF), we thus checked the expression and post-translational modifications of the dominant transcriptional factor IRF3 in viral RNA-induction of IFN-I. Here we found that acetate treatment enhanced IRF3 phosphorylation (pIRF3) (Fig. 5f). As expected, TANK binding kinase 1 (TBK1) phosphorylation (pTBK1) in these cells were also elevated upon acetate treatment (Fig. 5f), while no significant difference in IRF7 phosphorylation between acetate-treated and control BMDMs was notified (Supplementary Fig. 5i). Accordingly, acetate was not able to enhance any IFN-I production in Irf3−/− BMDMs (Fig. 5g).
In response to viral infection, mitochondrial antiviral signaling (MAVS) protein monomers form functional aggregates, which activate the transcription factor IRF3 to induce type I interferons25. Therefore, we believed that acetate had promoted polyI:C-induced MAVS aggregation to enhance IRF3 phosphorylation (pIRF3). This turned out to be true as indicated by semidenaturing detergent agarose gel electrophoresis (SDD-AGE) results: acetate-treated and polyI:C-stimulated BMDMs exhibited clearly more MAVS aggregates on mitochondria compared with polyI:C alone stimulated BMDMs (Fig. 5h). At the same time, less MAVS protein in the monomer form was detected in cell lysate-derived supernatant from acetate-treated and polyI:C-stimulated BMDMs compared to polyI:C alone stimulated cells (Fig. 5i).
As expected, acetate lost the capacity to enhance IFN-I production and IRF3 phosphorylation in Mavs−/− BMDM (Fig. 5j, k), nor to protect against IAV infection in Mavs−/− mice (Fig. 5l), demonstrating that MAVS was indeed involved in the mechanism by which acetate protected the mice from viral infection.
Acetate promotes MAVS aggregation through GPR43
There are specific and shared cellular receptors for short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs): propionate is an agonist for both G-protein coupled receptor 41 (GPR41) and G-protein coupled receptor 43 (GPR43), butyrate is more active on GPR41, whereas acetate is more selective for GPR4326. To investigate whether acetate promoted IFN-I production through GPR43, we first analyzed the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from IAV-infected WT mice, and found reduced viral load and increased concentrations of IFN-α and IFN-β in the BALF of acetate-treated mice (Fig. 6a, b). What’s more, sodium acetate (SA) treatment in these mice upregulated the expression of GPR43 on CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages in the BALF (Fig. 6c, Supplementary Fig. 6a). Next, we investigated the potential role of GPR43 for acetate-enhanced IFN-I induction. It was found that BMDMs expressed GPR43 (Supplementary Fig. 6b), and GPR43 protein level was increased by acetate treatment (Supplementary Fig. 6c). Importantly, GPR43 was activated directly by acetate, as indicated by increased intracellular Ca2+ mobilization27,28 in WT but not Gpr43−/− BMDMs (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b). Interestingly, 4-CMTB, a GPR43 agonist, also augmented polyI:C-induced IFN-α production from BMDMs (Fig. 6d), indicating an important role of GPR43 in promoting IFN-I production. Of note, Gpr43 deficiency or silencing with siRNA or GPR43 blocking with neutralizing antibody all compromised acetate function in promoting IFN-α production (Fig. 6e, Supplementary Fig. 6d, e, g). Accordingly, acetate-induced MAVS aggregation was clearly compromised when GPR43 was knockout or silenced with siRNA (Fig. 6f, Supplementary Fig. 6f). The protective role of acetate against IAV infection was also compromised in Gpr43−/− mice (Supplementary Fig. 6h). Thus, acetate promoted polyI:C-induced MAVS aggregation and IFN-I production through GPR43 receptor in macrophages.
To test the possibility of GPR43 interaction with MAVS, HEK293T cells were transfected with a plasmid expressing V5-tagged GPR43, along with a plasmid expressing FLAG-tagged MAVS. Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) and Western blot analysis demonstrated the interaction of MAVS with GPR43 (Fig. 6g). Moreover, fluorescence images demonstrated co-localization of MAVS with GPR43 in acetate-treated BMDMs upon polyI:C stimulation (Fig. 6h). Together, these data suggested that acetate treatment promoted GPR43 interaction with MAVS in BMDMs after polyI:C stimulation, which promotes subsequent MAVS aggregation and IFN-I induction.
NLRP3 participates in acetate-promoted IFN-I generation via aiding MAVS aggregation
In the beginning of our study, we found that WT mice co-housed with Nlrp3−/− mice (Co-WT) showed enhanced defense against IAV infection (Fig. 1a), which has been demonstrated to be resulted from increased B. pseudonlongum NjM1 producing acetic acid, while Nlrp3−/− mice with comparable NjM1 were susceptible to IAV infection (Fig. 1a, g). Based on the observations mentioned above, we hypothesized that NLRP3 might have been involved in the acetate-enhanced IFN-α production during IAV infection. To test this possibility, we first performed in vivo experiments in which WT and Nlrp3−/− mice were treated with acetate and infected with IAV. Here we found that Nlrp3−/− mice showed defective expression of Ifna1 (Fig. 7a), and bore significantly higher titer of virus in the lung compared to WT mice 3 days after infection (Fig. 7b). Accordingly, Nlrp3−/− mice exhibited significantly more weight loss compared with WT mice (Fig. 7c). In addition, we performed in vitro experiments, wherein WT and Nlrp3−/− BMDMs were treated with acetate and then stimulated with polyI:C. Notably, acetate promoted IFN-α production in WT BMDMs, but Nlrp3 deficiency impaired such function (Fig. 7d and Supplementary Fig. 8a). The results could not be attributed to cell differences due to lack of Nlrp3 expression, because there was no difference in CD11b, F4/80 or GPR43 expression between Nlrp3−/− and WT BMDMs (Supplementary Fig. 8b, c). The GPR43 intensity displayed in Nlrp3−/− BMDMs was also comparable to that in WT BMDMs after acetate treatment plus polyI:C stimulation (Supplementary Fig. 8d). A study from Macia, L. et al29. reported that the SCFA acetate binds to GPR43 on colonic epithelial cell lines to stimulate K+ efflux and hyperpolarization, leading to NLRP3 inflammasome activation, which is essential for gut homeostasis29. But acetate alone or acetate plus Poly I:C did not induce IL-1β release from macrophages (Supplementary Fig. 8a), indicating that acetate functions differently when it acts on different tissues or on different cell types.
Furthermore, we found that NLRP3 participated in acetate-enhanced MAVS aggregation, as acetate enhanced MAVS aggregation and IRF3 phosphorylation in WT cells but not in Nlrp3−/− cells (Fig. 7e). It has been reported that MAVS interacts with NLRP3 to facilitate NLRP3 inflammasome activation30,31. We confirmed that NLRP3 interacts with MAVS via Co-IP and confocal experiments (Fig. 7f, g, Supplementary Fig. 8e), which could be a necessary step for an optimal aggregation and function of MAVS to activate IRF3 phosphorylation. Since GPR43 also interacts with MAVS (Fig. 6g, h), we investigated the possible interaction of NLRP3 with GPR43. Results of the Co-IP and confocal experiments showed that NLRP3 indeed interacted with GPR43 (Fig. 7h, i, Supplementary Fig. 8e) and NLRP3 was able to form a complex with GPR43 and MAVS (Fig. 7j, k). Furthermore, we performed additional experiments to demonstrate the function of NLRP3 in the process of IFN-I generation, and found that GPR43 activation significantly increased IFN-I production, IRF3 phosphorylation and mitochondrial MAVS aggregation (Supplementary Fig. 9a–c), in which NLRP3 was required (Supplementary Fig. 9a, b, c). In addition, further results demonstrated that GPR43 activation leads to the translocation of MAVS to mitochondria, which is compromised when NLRP3 was deleted in macrophages (Supplementary Fig. 9d).
Together, these data suggested that NLRP3 interacts with GPR43, which then aids in MAVS translocation and aggregation to induce optimal IFN-I production upon IAV infection.
Discussion
Our current work demonstrates that gut microbiota-derived acetate conferred protection against IAV infection by enhancing IFN-I production, in which NLRP3 is required to interact with the acetate receptor GPR43 to promote MAVS aggregation that activates IRF3 (Fig. 8).
The present work revealed that a new bacterium strain Bifidobacterium pseudolongum NjM1 is enriched in the gut microbiota of Nlrp3−/− mice, which protects wild-type mice against IAV infection during co-housing. It’s likely that a reciprocal regulation exits between host genetic factors and gut microbiota. In the absence of Nlrp3 gene, probably the expression of some host factors such as antimicrobial peptides have been changed, so as to impact the composition of microbiota in the intestine. Host shaping of gut microbiota is an important, albeit complex issue to address. The mechanism through which Nlrp3 affects gut microbiota will be dissected in the future.
B. pseudolongum NjM1 produces acetate, and both the bacterium and sodium acetate are protective against IAV infection. However, it is important to note that WT mice co-housed with Nlrp3−/− mice (Co-WT) survived 100%, and their weight loss did not exceed 10% (Fig. 1a); in contrast, WT mice gavaged with the NjM1 strain still exhibited clear weight loss, although significantly less than in the control group (Fig. 3a). These data demonstrate that there are other protective bacteria besides the acetate-producing NjM1 in the gut of Co-WT mice against IAV infection; but NjM1 is the one that can colonize WT mice during co-housing and produce acetate to exert a protective function, even though it is not the only one. Similarly, although multiple metabolites may account for the protective effect of NjM1 against IAV infection, acetate is likely to be one of the most important. An acetokinase, whose gene is located at 1517624–1518847 bp in the genome of B. pseudolongum NjM1, should be the key enzyme that controls the final production of acetate. Since genetic manipulation of Bifidobacterium is rather challenging for the time being, we may generate mutant strain to show the direct effect of acetokinase in NjM1 on acetate production, as well as the compromised effect of such mutant strain on IAV protection in future.
It was recently demonstrated that acetate protects against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection through a GPR43-IFN-I response in lung epithelial cells32. There is also study suggesting that alveolar macrophages produce type I interferon to fight against RSV infection33. Our current work demonstrated that acetate combated influenza A virus infection by enhancing viral RNA-induced IFN-I production in CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages in the lung, in which GPR43 expression was upregulated by acetate treatment. Although acetate may have also affected the function of lung epithelial cells, our experiment showed that macrophages should be one of the major types of cells for controlling IAV, as depletion of macrophages rendered acetate ineffective (Fig. 4d).
Although acetate functions as a booster in IFN-I production via GPR43, the mechanism remained elusive so far32. Notably, our study demonstrated that GPR43 is associated with MAVS, one of the key adaptors in antiviral signaling. Engagement of GPR43 to the MAVS-TBK1-IRF3 signalosome strongly enhanced viral RNA-induced generation of type I interferon. This finding represents a key step forward in understanding the mechanism behind GPR43-mediated enhancement of IFN-I induction. Because type I interferons have broad-spectrum antiviral functions, the mechanism found in the current work may also be applicable to resistance to other virus infections such as SARS-CoV-2.
Of note, NLRP3 is also a critical element of the acetate-GPR43-MAVS signaling complex. NLRP3 expression is upregulated by acetate once polyI:C stimulation is added (Supplementary Fig. 8a), implying that acetate makes the cells faster in inducing NLRP3 expression in response to polyI:C, which potentially promoted IFN-I production quicker when cells encounter viral infections. Acetate enhancing NLRP3 and IFN-I expression is mediated by GPR43 activation-Ca2+ mobilization (Supplementary Fig. 7a–d), in which NF-κB (nuclear factor κB) and p38 MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) also participate (Supplementary Fig. 7e–h). Acetate alone does not induce MAVS aggregation unless the cells encounter danger signals, which should be necessary for the host to avoid pathologic damage caused by excessive IFN-I. Our biochemical and cellular evidence showed that NLRP3 is associated with both GPR43 and MAVS, and the presence of NLRP3 significantly enhanced the aggregation of MAVS, which is a prerequisite for TBK1/IRF3 phosphorylation and induction of IFN-I gene expression. Although the NLRP3 inflammasome has been implicated in many diseases, and a big plethora of cellular events affect NLRP3 activation34,35, its participation in IFN-I induction has not been found before. Thus, the current work emphasizes the important roles that NLRP3 play in many signaling events, and implies the complexity to understand this critical molecule.
In summary, our work identified a special strain Bifidobacterium pseudolongum NjM1 to be protective against influenza A virus infection through acetate via GPR43-MAVS-IRF3-mediated IFN-I signal, in which NLRP3 is a key component bridging GPR43 and MAVS. Such findings imply the complex and critical connection between gut-lung, microbiota-immunity axes in combating influenza virus infection, thus may help future designing of intervention strategies against respiratory viral infections.
Methods
Ethics statement
All animal experiments were performed in compliance with the Regulations for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals issued by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China, which enforces the ethical use of animals. The protocol was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Institut Pasteur of Shanghai, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Permit Number: P2019014).
Virus
Influenza virus strain A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) was inoculated into the chorioallantoic fluid of 9-day-old specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chicken embryos, as previously described36. The titer corresponding to the median lethal dose (LD50) was determined in adult mice by intranasal inoculation. All viral infection experiments were performed in the biosafety level 2 laboratory at Institut Pasteur of Shanghai following the standard operating protocols approved by the institutional biosafety committee.
Mice
All mice used in this study were female mice on C57BL/6 background (6–9 weeks old). WT (wild-type), Ifnar1−/− and Mavs−/− mice were originally from the Jax lab, Irf3−/− mice were originally from Dr. T. Taniguchi and shared through Dr. F. Shao37, Gpr43−/− mice were purchased from Cyagen Biotechnology Co., Ltd (https://www.cyagen.com/cn/zh-cn/sperm-bank-live/233079) and Nlrp3−/− mice had been described before38,39. The mice were routinely maintained in a pathogen-free animal facility at a temperature of 21 °C, relative humidity of 50%-70%, and under a constant 12 h light/dark cycle, and were given free access to a regular chow diet (Cat# P1101F-25, Shanghai SLACOM) and water throughout the study at Institut Pasteur of Shanghai. Cohousing (Co-) of WT and Nlrp3−/− mice were carried out at 1:1 ratio since weaning (3 weeks old) till adulthood (9 weeks old), or the mice were separated upon weaning according to genotype, denoted as singly housed (Single-). All procedures were conducted in compliance with a protocol approved by the IACUC at Institut Pasteur of Shanghai, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.
Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM)
BMDMs were differentiated according to the method described previously40. Briefly, bone marrow cells were isolated by flushing femurs and tibia of 6- to 8-week-old WT, Nlrp3−/−, Irf3−/−, Gpr43−/− or Mavs−/− mice with DMEM medium (Hyclone, Cat# SH30809.01). Red blood cells were lysed with red blood cell lysis buffer (Beyotime), and bone marrow cells were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 30% mouse fibroblasts L929 (ATCC CCL-1) conditioned medium, 10% FBS (AusGeneX, Cat# SA500S), 100 U/mL Penicillin and 100 μg/mL Streptomycin (Gibco), as well as 50 μM β-Me (SIGMA). At day 3, fresh DMEM medium and L929 cell (ATCC CCL-1) conditioned medium was added. BMDMs were used on day 5 for siRNA transfection by electroporation or on day 6 for sodium acetate treatment plus polyI:C stimulation.
Virus infection of mice
Mice were anesthetized with Avertin (2,2,2-tribromoethanol, SIGMA) and infected intranasally with A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) in 25 uL of PBS (1 LD50 for 9-week-old WT mice). Mice were either weighed and monitored daily or euthanized at various intervals for sampling. Mice were humanely euthanized when infection had progressed to a human endpoint at which the mice started to suffer. The infected mice of more than 25% weight loss were treated as death. Weight loss and survival data were analyzed using the GraphPad Prism v8.0 software unless stated otherwise.
Depletion of commensal bacteria
Gut microbiota removal was performed as previously described41. Briefly, mice were treated with a cocktail of antibiotics containing ampicillin (1 g/L), metronidazole (1 g/L), neomycin (1 g/L), and vancomycin (0.5 g/L) in drinking water for 6 weeks. Stool pellets (~0.05 g/mice) were collected in 1 mL of Ringer’s de solution (for 1 L preparation, NaCl 9 g, KCl 0.4 g, CaCl2·2H2O 0.25 g, and L-Cystcine·HCl 0.5 g, 121 °C autoclaved for 15 min) and homogenized. Different dilutions of the suspensions were plated on mGAM (HB8518) and incubated at 37 °C either in an anaerobic incubator (80% N2:10% CO2:10% H2) or normal aerobic condition for 48 h. Bacterial counts were determined by colony-forming assay and the depletion efficiency was >99.9%. All the antibiotics used here were purchased from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co.
Gut microbiota profiling
The bacterial DNA extraction from fecal samples of mice were performed as previously described42. A sequencing library of the V3–V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene was constructed following the manufacturer’s instructions (Part #876 15044223Rev.B; Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) with improvement as previously described43, and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The raw paired-end reads were processed and analyzed using the QIIME2 v2018.11. Demultiplexed sequence data was imported into QIIME2 v2018.11, adapters and primers were trimmed. ASVs from each sample were inferred by using the DADA2 pipeline for filtering, dereplication, sample inference, merging of paired-end reads and chimera identification. In the process of running the DADA2 pipeline, based on the quality profile of the data, forward and reverse reads were trimmed accordingly to ensure that the median quality score for each position is above 32. The taxonomy of all ASVs were annotated by SILVA (v132) reference database44. All samples were rarefied to 10,000 per sample for downstream analysis. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of ASVs based on Bray–Curtis distance was performed using QIIME2 v2018.11. The amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) that were significantly altered between two groups were identified using the algorithm LDA Effect Size (LEfSe)20.
1H NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) spectroscopy
Detection of metabolites was conducted by Shanghai Metabolome Institute (SMI)-Wuhan. Fecal samples were prepared by dissolving 50 mg of feces in 600 μL of 0.1 M deuterated Na+/K+ buffer (for 0.1 L preparation, 1.844 g K2HPO4·3H2O, 0.315 g NaH2PO4·2H2O, 0.001 g TSP (sodium 3-(trimethylsilyl) propionate-2,2,3,3-d4), 0.01 g NaN3, PH7.5) and quick frozen-thawed three times with liquid nitrogen. The mixture was homogenized with a tissue lyser (90 s, 20 Hz) and centrifuged at 13,200 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (550 μL) was transferred to a 5 mm NMR tube. The fecal NMR spectra were acquired at 298 K under an automatic sample changer system (BACS, Bruker Biospin, Germany) using a Bruker AVIII 600 MHz spectrometer equipped with an inverse cryoprobe (operating at 600.13 MHz for 1H). One dimensional 1H NMR spectra were acquired for each fecal sample using NOESYGPPR1D sequence (RD-90°-t1−90°-tm−90°-ACQ). Water suppression was achieved with irradiation on the water peak during the recycle delay (RD) of 2 s and a mixing time (tm) of 100 ms. t1 was set to 4 μs. The 90° pulse length was adjusted to 11 μs, and 32 transients were collected into 32k data points for each spectrum with a spectral width of 20 ppm. Data analysis had been described before45.
Sequence-guided bacteria isolation
Fresh fecal samples from Nlrp3−/− mice were collected and mixed in anaerobic sterile Ringer’s de solution shown in Depletion of Commensal Bacteria section above in an anaerobic workstation (Don Whitley scientific Ltd, 798 Shipley, UK). The diluted suspension with Ringer’s de solution was plated onto mGAM and incubated under anaerobic condition (80% N2, 10% CO2, and 10% H2) at 37 °C for 4 days. The 16S rRNA gene V3 region of each colony was obtained using the primer pairs listed in Supplementary Table 1. The obtained 16S rRNA gene V3 sequences were subjected to Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) and aligned with the ASV1 or ASV4 enriched in the gut of singly housed Nlrp3−/− mice. ASV4-associated strain was successfully isolated using a previously reported mGAM medium (Nissui 05426) and named B. pseudolongum NjM1. The 16S rRNA sequence of B. pseudolongum NjM1 was aligned in GenBank and the 16S rRNA gene sequences of representative strains in the genus Bifidobacterium were selected to build a phylogenetic tree by using the Neighbor-Joining method in MEGA 6.
Whole-genome sequencing and analysis of B. pseudolongum NjM1
Whole-genome DNA of B. pseudolongum NjM1 was extracted with QIAamp BiOstic Bacteremia DNA Kit (QIAGEN) and sequenced with the PromethION platform (Nextomics Biosciences, Wuhan, China). Subreads of the sequence were assembled into a single complete chromosome using the HGAP 2.3.0 pipeline46. Protein-coding sequences (CDSs), tRNAs, and rRNAs were predicted and annotated using the Prokka 1.12 pipeline47. Functional annotation of genes was performed using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database.
Short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) profiling for B. pseudolongum NjM1
SCFA concentrations in B. pseudolongum NjM1 culture supernatant were determined using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) as previously described48. Briefly, B. pseudolongum NjM1 was cultured in mGAM medium under anaerobic condition (80% N2, 10% CO2, and 10% H2) at 37 °C for 8 h, and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. B. pseudolongum NjM1 culture supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm nylon filter (EMD Millipore). An aliquot (50 μL) of the supernatant was acidified by adding 25 μL 50% (v/v) sulfuric acid and vortexing for 10–15 s. The organic acids were extracted by adding 100 μL of diethyl ether and vortexing for 10–15 s and standing for 2 min. After centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C, the supernatant containing SCFAs was measured by GC on an Agilent 6890 (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA) equipped with flame ionization, thermal conductivity detectors, capillary columns and GC ChemStation software.
B. pseudolongum NjM1 inoculation in mice
B. pseudolongum NjM1 was cultured in mGAM medium under anaerobic condition (80% N2, 10% CO2, and 10% H2) at 37 °C for 8 h. The harvested bacterial cells were washed twice with pure mGAM and resuspended in mGAM, and added with equal volume of 50% glycerol to a density of 7.4 × 1010 cells/mL and stored at −80 °C until 10-fold dilution and inoculation by gavage with 1.48 × 109 cells for each mouse. The culture supernatant of B. pseudolongum NjM1 was used to treat mice by intranasal administration.
Mice feeding with HAMS or HAMSA diets and acetate measurements
Diets HAMS (high-amylose maize starch) (fiber (4.8% cellulose and 15% high-amylose resistant starch), 18.1% protein, 7.1% fat and 17.7 mj/kg digestible energy) and HAMSA (acetylated HAMS) (fiber (4.8% cellulose and 15% acetylated high-amylose resistant starch), 18.1% protein, 7.1% fat and 17.7 mj/kg digestible energy) were produced by XieTong Biology, NanJing, China. Mice were fed with the diets HAMS or HAMSA for 5 weeks (starting at 3 weeks of age as previously described21, diets were refreshed three times per week) before subjected to influenza A viral infection experiments. Cecal, fecal samples and serum were processed for SCFA analysis using gas chromatography at the end of the viral infection.
Pulmonary histopathology
For histopathologic examination, lungs were collected from mice at the indicated days, fixed through immersion in 10% buffered formalin for at least one week at 4 °C, processed, embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The peribronchial inflammation was scored according to Barends et al49., ranked as absent (0), minimal (1), slight (2), moderate (3), marked (4), or severe (5). Slide analysis was performed in a blinded manner.
Plaque assay of IAV
Lungs were weighed and homogenized in 1 mL of PBS, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was harvested in 1 mL of PBS, and the supernatants of PR8-infected BMDMs were harvested. They were centrifuged at 400 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatants containing influenza virus were diluted serially with 0.2% BSA (bovine serum albumin) in PBS. MDCK cells (ATCC CCL-34) were grown in 48-well cell culture plates to produce a confluent monolayer, and then washed with PBS, infected with serially diluted supernatants, and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h for virus absorption. Unabsorbed virus particles were washed away with PBS, and then 0.5 mL of 1×DMEM (SIGMA, Cat# D5796) medium containing 0.2% BSA, 100 U/mL Penicillin and 100 μg/mL Streptomycin, 1.2% colloidal microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel®) and 2 μg/mL TPCK-treated trypsin, was added to each well. After incubation for 48 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2 incubator, the MDCK cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), and then incubated with rabbit anti-influenza A Nucleoprotein/NP antibody (SinoBiological, Cat# 11675-T62, dilution 1:2000) followed with goat-anti-rabbit HRP. Color development was performed with True BlueTM Peroxidase Substrate (KPL), plaques in each well were counted, and then the results were averaged and multiplied by the dilution factor for calculation of viral titers.
Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted from homogenized lung or BMDMs with TRIzol reagent (SIGMA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Synthesis of cDNA was performed with a GoScriptTM Reverse Transcription kit (Promega). Real time quantitative PCR was performed with the SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (TOYOBO) on an ABI 7900 HT Fast Real-Time cycler (Applied Biosystems). The expression of target genes was normalized to expression of housekeeping gene Gapdh (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase). The qPCR primers used in this study were listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Macrophage depletion
WT mice were pretreated with sodium acetate (SA) or drinking water and then intranasally administered with 100 μL of clodronate (LIPOSOMA, C28J0620) to deplete macrophages in the lung. The cell number of alveolar macrophages in BALF were analyzed by flow cytometry.
BALF related experiments
The bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was harvested in 1 mL of PBS on day 3 post-infection and centrifuged at 400 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected and frozen at −80 °C for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and virus titration. The red blood cells were lysed, and remaining cells were counted with a hemocytometer and stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies for flow cytometry.
Flow cytometry
Cells from BALF or BMDMs were washed with FACS buffer (1 × PBS containing 0.5% BSA and 2 mM EDTA) and then blocked with FcR blocking antibody (anti-Mouse CD16/CD32 (clone 2.4G2, BD Pharmingen, Cat# 553142, dilution 1:100)) before surface staining with BV605 anti-Mouse CD45.2 (clone 104, BD Horizon, Cat# 563051, dilution 1:160), APC-Cy7 anti-Mouse CD11b (clone M1/70, BD Pharmingen, Cat# 561039, dilution 1:160), PE-Cy7 anti-Mouse F4/80 (clone BM8, Biolegend, Cat# 123114, dilution 1:160) and AF488 anti-GPR43 (Bioss, Cat# bs-13536R-A488, dilution 1:160). For intracellular Ca2+ detection, BMDMs were treated with 250 μM sodium acetate (SA) (S5636, SIGMA) for 24 h, washed with PBS three times, and then incubated with 2 μM of Fluo-4 AM (S1060, Beyotime) for 45 min at 24 °C. Dead cells were excluded using 7AAD (BD Pharmingen, Cat# 559925, dilution 1:500) and data were acquired using a BD Fortessa flow cytometer with BD FACSDivaTM software v6 and then analyzed with FlowJo_v10 software.
Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
Mouse IFN-α and IFN-β protein levels were measured with mouse IFN-α ELISA kit (BMS6027, Invitrogen) and mouse IFN-β ELISA kit (42400-1, PBL Assay Science) according to the manufacturers’ instructions.
Immunoblotting
The cells were incubated in lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (PH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40 (v/v), 1.0% SDS (m/v), 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4 and protease inhibitor cocktail at 4 °C for 30 min on a shaker, and then the cell lysates were mixed with SDS loading buffer. The protein-loading buffer mixture was boiled to denature at 100 °C for 10 min before the SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis for protein separation. After electrophoresis, the proteins were wet-transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Millipore), blocked with 5% BSA in 1×TBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 and then blotted for indicated proteins using the antibodies listed in Supplementary Table 2. The uncropped blot images can be found in Source Data file.
siRNA design and transfection
SiRNAs (small interfering RNAs) targeting Gpr43 or Luciferase GL2 were ordered from NIBS, Beijing. Oligonucleotides for siRNAs targeting Gpr43 or Luciferase GL2 were listed in Supplementary Table 1. siRNAs were transfected to BMDMs by electroporation (100 pmol of siRNAs per 1 × 106 BMDMs) with the electroporation solution and cuvettes (Mirus Ingenio®) and a nucleofector device (Lonza) equipped with a program O-013 for 48 h before sodium acetate treatment.
Confocal fluorescence microscopy
BMDMs were treated with or without 250 μM sodium acetate for 24 h and then transfected with 200 ng polyI:C using transfection reagent Lipofectamine 2000 for 1 h. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min, blocked with 1 × PBS containing 5% goat sera and 0.3% Triton X-100 for 1 h and then sequentially incubated with rabbit anti-MAVS (Cat# 4983, rodent specific, CST) for 12 h at 4 °C, goat-anti-rabbit IgG (AF555 conjugated) for 2 h at room temperature, rabbit anti-GPR43 (AF488 conjugated) (bs-13536R-A488, Bioss) for 2 h at room temperature and DAPI for 1 min at room temperature. The fluorescence images were collected on a laser capture confocal microscope (Olympus FV1200) using separate laser excitation to avoid any cross-interference between different fluorophores. For NLRP3 colocalization with MAVS or GPR43, Nlrp3−/− BMDMs were infected with PRP-eGFP-mNlrp3 retrovirus and pretreated with or without 250 μM sodium acetate for 24 h and then transfected with 200 ng polyI:C for 1 h. The cells were fixed, blocked, and then incubated with rabbit anti-MAVS (Cat# 4983, rodent specific, CST) or rabbit anti-GPR43 (bs-13536R, Bioss) for 12 h at 4 °C, goat-anti-rabbit IgG (AF555 conjugated) for 2 h at room temperature and DAPI for 1 min at room temperature. The fluorescence images were collected.
Co-immunoprecipitation assay
HEK293T cells (ATCC CRL-3216) were transfected with the plasmids using transfection reagent Lipofectamine 2000 (invitrogen). At 36 h post-transfection, the cells were lysed with lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl PH7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40 (v/v), 0.5% SDS (m/v)) supplemented with a proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Roche), 1 mM NaF and 1 mM Na3VO4 for 30 min at 4 °C. The cell lysates were centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C and 10% supernatants were used as input, and 90% supernatants were 10-fold diluted with 0.5% NP40 (50 mM Tris-HCl PH7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP40 (v/v)) and then incubated with either 1 μg mouse anti-FLAG (clone M2, SIGMA, Cat# F3165, dilution 1:1000) or 1 μg mouse anti-V5 (clone AMC0506, ABcolonal, Cat# AE017, dilution 1:200) or 1 μg mouse anti-GFP (clone 5G4, CST, Cat# 55494, dilution 1:50) on a roller (QILINBEIER-206) overnight at 4 °C. The Protein A/G Magnetic Beads for IP (bimake) were added to the supernatants and incubated for 1 h on the roller at 4 °C, washed three times with 0.5% NP40, and then boiled in 2×Western loading buffer for 5 min at 95 °C for immunoblotting.
Semidenaturing detergent agarose gel electrophoresis for MAVS aggregation
Semidenaturing detergent agarose gel electrophoresis (SDD-AGE) was performed for the detection of MAVS aggregation according to a published protocol with minor modifications25. In brief, BMDMs were treated with or without 250 μM sodium acetate for 24 h and then transfected with 200 ng polyI:C using transfection reagent Lipofectamine 2000 for 1 h. Crude mitochondria were extracted using a mitochondria isolation kit (Cat# 89874, Thermo ScientificTM) according to the manufacturer’s instructions on Reagent-based Method and then resuspended in 1×sample buffer (0.5 × TBE, 10% glycerol, 2% SDS, 0.0025% bromophenol blue) and loaded onto a vertical 1.5% agarose gel (BIOWEST). After electrophoresis in the running buffer (1×TBE and 0.1% SDS) for 35 min with a constant voltage of 100 V at 4 °C, the proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore) for immunoblotting.
Ca2 + chelator experiment and inhibitor experiment
BMDMs were pretreated with BAPTA-AM (Cat# HY-100545, MCE), BAY 11-7085 (Cat# HY-13453, MCE), SB203580 (Cat# 5633, CST), PD98059 (Cat# 9900, CST), or 25 μM SP600125 (Cat# 8177, CST) for 1 h and 250 μM sodium acetate (S5636, SIGMA) for 24 h and then transfected with 200 ng polyI:C using Lipofectamine 2000. Relative Nlrp3 and Ifna1 expression to Gapdh was determined by quantitative real-time PCR.
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism v8.0 software (La Jolla, CA, USA) and IBM SPSS Statistics 23 were used for data analysis. Statistically significant difference was determined by two-tailed Student’s t test for two groups or one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test or Dunnett’s post-hoc test for three or more groups. Survival curves were compared with the Log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. p < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Shi Yu for help with SDD-AGE experiment, and Dr. Song Huang from NIBS for support on siRNA synthesis. G.M. is supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (81830049, 92269202), Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2022YFC2303200), Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB29030303), International Partnership Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (153831KYSB20190008), the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (2019SHZDZX02), Research Leader Program (20XD1403900), Innovation Capacity Building Project of Jiangsu province (BM2020019). J.N. is supported by grants from Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2022YFC2304700). A.L. is supported by grants from Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2018YFA0507300). J.L. is supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (32000077).
Source data
Author contributions
G.M. conceived the project; J.N. conducted most of the experiments; M.C., X.Y., J.L., Y.Y., Q.G., and A.L. helped with experiments; D.Z. and X.Q. provided critical reagents; J.N., C.Z., L.Z., and G.M. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; G.M. supervised the study.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Charles Mackay and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Data availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article, its supplementary information files or Source Data file. The 16 S rRNA gene sequences of Bifidobacterium strain NjM1 has been deposited in the Nucelotide database under accession code MW736893, MW736894, MW736895 and MW736897. The whole-genome sequence of Bifidobacterium strain NjM1 has been deposited in the Genome database under accession code PRJNA714197 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CP071805.1?report=fasta). The raw Illumina sequence data generated in this study have been deposited in the sequence read archive (SRA) database under accession code SRP310513. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Chenhong Zhang, Email: zhangchenhong@sjtu.edu.cn.
Liping Zhao, Email: liping.zhao@rutgers.edu.
Guangxun Meng, Email: gxmeng@ips.ac.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-36323-4.
References
- 1.Subbarao K, Joseph T. Scientific barriers to developing vaccines against avian influenza viruses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007;7:267–278. doi: 10.1038/nri2054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.te Velthuis AJW, Fodor E. Influenza virus RNA polymerase: insights into the mechanisms of viral RNA synthesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016;14:479–493. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Creager HM, et al. Infection and replication of influenza virus at the ocular surface. J. Virol. 2018;92:e02192–17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02192-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Trompette A, et al. Dietary fiber confers protection against flu by shaping Ly6c(-) patrolling monocyte hematopoiesis and CD8(+) T Cell Metabolism. Immunity. 2018;48:992–1005 e1008. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ramos I, et al. Innate immune response to influenza virus at single-cell resolution in human epithelial cells revealed paracrine induction of interferon lambda 1. J. Virol. 2019;93:e00559–19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00559-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Iwasaki A, Pillai PS. Innate immunity to influenza virus infection. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014;14:315–328. doi: 10.1038/nri3665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Seth RB, Sun L, Chen ZJ. Antiviral innate immunity pathways. Cell Res. 2006;16:141–147. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7310019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Diebold, S. S., Kaisho, T., Hemmi, H. & Akira, S. & Reis e Sousa, C. Innate antiviral responses by means of TLR7-mediated recognition of single-stranded RNA. Science303, 1529–1531 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 9.Le Goffic R, et al. Detrimental contribution of the Toll-like receptor (TLR)3 to influenza A virus-induced acute pneumonia. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2:e53. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ivashkiv LB, Donlin LT. Regulation of type I interferon responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014;14:36–49. doi: 10.1038/nri3581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schaupp L, et al. Microbiota-induced type I interferons instruct a poised basal state of dendritic cells. Cell. 2020;181:1080–1096 e1019. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stefan KL, Kim MV, Iwasaki A, Kasper DL. Commensal microbiota modulation of natural resistance to virus infection. Cell. 2020;183:1312–1324 e1310. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Steed AL, et al. The microbial metabolite desaminotyrosine protects from influenza through type I interferon. Science. 2017;357:498–502. doi: 10.1126/science.aam5336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.He Y, Hara H, Nunez G. Mechanism and regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2016;41:1012–1021. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shi J, Gao W, Shao F. Pyroptosis: gasdermin-mediated programmed necrotic cell death. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2017;42:245–254. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Allen IC, et al. The NLRP3 inflammasome mediates in vivo innate immunity to influenza A virus through recognition of viral RNA. Immunity. 2009;30:556–565. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Thomas PG, et al. The intracellular sensor NLRP3 mediates key innate and healing responses to influenza A virus via the regulation of caspase-1. Immunity. 2009;30:566–575. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stout-Delgado HW, Vaughan SE, Shirali AC, Jaramillo RJ, Harrod KS. Impaired NLRP3 inflammasome function in elderly mice during influenza infection is rescued by treatment with nigericin. J. Immunol. 2012;188:2815–2824. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Niu J, et al. Hyperactivation of the NLRP3 inflammasome protects mice against influenza A virus infection via IL-1beta mediated neutrophil recruitment. Cytokine. 2019;120:115–124. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2019.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Segata N, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R60. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Marino E, et al. Gut microbial metabolites limit the frequency of autoimmune T cells and protect against type 1 diabetes. Nat. Immunol. 2017;18:552–562. doi: 10.1038/ni.3713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fukuda S, et al. Bifidobacteria can protect from enteropathogenic infection through production of acetate. Nature. 2011;469:543–U791. doi: 10.1038/nature09646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Furusawa Y, et al. Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells. Nature. 2013;504:446. doi: 10.1038/nature12721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Annison G, Illman RJ, Topping DL. Acetylated, propionylated or butyrylated starches raise large bowel short-chain fatty acids preferentially when fed to rats. J. Nutr. 2003;133:3523–3528. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.11.3523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hou F, et al. MAVS forms functional prion-like aggregates to activate and propagate antiviral innate immune response. Cell. 2011;146:448–461. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Le Poul E, et al. Functional characterization of human receptors for short chain fatty acids and their role in polymorphonuclear cell activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:25481–25489. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301403200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xu MD, et al. Acetate attenuates inflammasome activation through GPR43-mediated Ca2+-dependent NLRP3 ubiquitination. Exp. Mol. Med. 2019;51:1–13. doi: 10.1038/s12276-019-0276-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Thorburn AN, Macia L, Mackay CR. Diet, metabolites, and “western-lifestyle” inflammatory diseases. Immunity. 2014;40:833–842. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Macia L, et al. Metabolite-sensing receptors GPR43 and GPR109A facilitate dietary fibre-induced gut homeostasis through regulation of the inflammasome. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6734. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Subramanian N, Natarajan K, Clatworthy MR, Wang Z, Germain RN. The adaptor MAVS promotes NLRP3 mitochondrial localization and inflammasome activation. Cell. 2013;153:348–361. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Park S, et al. The mitochondrial antiviral protein MAVS associates with NLRP3 and regulates its inflammasome activity. J. Immunol. 2013;191:4358–4366. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Antunes KH, et al. Microbiota-derived acetate protects against respiratory syncytial virus infection through a GPR43-type 1 interferon response. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:3273. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11152-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Goritzka M, et al. Alveolar macrophage-derived type I interferons orchestrate innate immunity to RSV through recruitment of antiviral monocytes. J. Exp. Med. 2015;212:699–714. doi: 10.1084/jem.20140825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Broz P, Dixit VM. Inflammasomes: mechanism of assembly, regulation and signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016;16:407–420. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Swanson KV, Deng M, Ting JP. The NLRP3 inflammasome: molecular activation and regulation to therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019;19:477–489. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0165-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhou D, et al. A universal influenza A vaccine based on adenovirus expressing matrix-2 ectodomain and nucleoprotein protects mice from lethal challenge. Mol. Ther. 2010;18:2182–2189. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ge J, Gong YN, Xu Y, Shao F. Preventing bacterial DNA release and absent in melanoma 2 inflammasome activation by a Legionella effector functioning in membrane trafficking. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:6193–6198. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117490109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mao K, et al. Nitric oxide suppresses NLRP3 inflammasome activation and protects against LPS-induced septic shock. Cell Res. 2013;23:201–212. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Meng G, Zhang F, Fuss I, Kitani A, Strober W. A mutation in the Nlrp3 gene causing inflammasome hyperactivation potentiates Th17 cell-dominant immune responses. Immunity. 2009;30:860–874. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Xing Y, et al. Cutting Edge: TRAF6 Mediates TLR/IL-1R Signaling-Induced Nontranscriptional Priming of the NLRP3 Inflammasome. J. Immunol. 2017;199:1561–1566. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Song X, et al. Alterations in the microbiota drive interleukin-17C production from intestinal epithelial cells to promote tumorigenesis. Immunity. 2014;40:140–152. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Godon JJ, Zumstein E, Dabert P, Habouzit F, Moletta R. Molecular microbial diversity of an anaerobic digestor as determined by small-subunit rDNA sequence analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997;63:2802–2813. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.7.2802-2813.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhang Q, et al. Accelerated dysbiosis of gut microbiota during aggravation of DSS-induced colitis by a butyrate-producing bacterium. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:27572. doi: 10.1038/srep27572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Quast C, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wu JF, et al. Metabolomics insights into the modulatory effects of long-term low calorie intake in mice. J. Proteome Res. 2016;15:2299–2308. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chin CS, et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat. Methods. 2013;10:563–569. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhao L, et al. Gut bacteria selectively promoted by dietary fibers alleviate type 2 diabetes. Science. 2018;359:1151–1156. doi: 10.1126/science.aao5774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Barends M, et al. Timing of infection and prior immunization with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in RSV-enhanced allergic inflammation. J. Infect. Dis. 2004;189:1866–1872. doi: 10.1086/386341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article, its supplementary information files or Source Data file. The 16 S rRNA gene sequences of Bifidobacterium strain NjM1 has been deposited in the Nucelotide database under accession code MW736893, MW736894, MW736895 and MW736897. The whole-genome sequence of Bifidobacterium strain NjM1 has been deposited in the Genome database under accession code PRJNA714197 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CP071805.1?report=fasta). The raw Illumina sequence data generated in this study have been deposited in the sequence read archive (SRA) database under accession code SRP310513. Source data are provided with this paper.