Abstract
Plasmids belonging to Escherichia coli incompatibility group Q are relatively small (approximately 5 to 15 kb) and able to replicate in a remarkably broad range of bacterial hosts. These include gram-positive bacteria such as Brevibacterium and Mycobacterium and gram-negative bacteria such as Agrobacterium, Desulfovibrio, and cyanobacteria. These plasmids are mobilized by several self-transmissible plasmids into an even more diverse range of organisms including yeasts, plants, and animal cells. IncQ plasmids are thus highly promiscuous. Recently, several IncQ-like plasmids have been isolated from bacteria found in environments as diverse as piggery manure and highly acidic commercial mineral biooxidation plants. These IncQ-like plasmids belong to different incompatibility groups but have similar broad-host-range replicons and mobilization properties to the IncQ plasmids. This review covers the ecology, classification, and evolution of IncQ and IncQ-like plasmids.
Plasmids of the Escherichia coli incompatibility group Q (IncQ) and related IncQ-like plasmids are characterized by their relatively small size, their ability to be mobilized by several self-transmissible plasmids, and their broad host range (25). This combination of characteristics has resulted in plasmids of this type being highly promiscuous. As a consequence, IncQ family plasmids are found in a variety of very different environments. Since there are very few families of truly broad-host-range, highly mobilizable plasmids, plasmids of the IncQ family are good candidates for research into fundamental aspects of plasmid biology. The importance of these studies is increased because IncQ plasmids have been used as a major source of broad-host-range replicons in the development of genetic systems for a wide range of bacteria (5, 85).
As will be described in this review, the promiscuous nature of plasmids of the IncQ family has resulted in the acquisition of these plasmids by microorganisms growing in a number of very different environments. The effect of this is that there appear to be several evolutionary lineages of these plasmids, making the study of these plasmids interesting from the points of view of evolutionary plasmid molecular biology and the ecological distribution of plasmids. The replication, regulation, and mobilization functions of some of the prototypic IncQ plasmids have been extensively studied, and good reviews on these aspects are available (19, 25, 59, 76). The aim of this review is not to repeat material that has been reviewed elsewhere but, rather, to compare the IncQ and IncQ-like plasmids in the light of several recently discovered plasmids which belong to the IncQ family.
ECOLOGICAL DISTRIBUTION AND DIVERSITY
The most extensively studied plasmids of the IncQ family are the IncQ plasmids RSF1010, R1162, and R300B, which were isolated independently from E. coli (32), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12, 53), and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, respectively (6). Although originating from different hosts, these plasmids each contain streptomycin and sulfonamide resistance genes and appear to be nearly identical. During investigations into plasmids containing antibiotic resistance genes from E. coli, other enterobacteria, and a variety of other bacteria of medical importance, several IncQ plasmids which contain additional or different antibiotic resistance genes to RSF1010 have been isolated (94). Not all of these plasmids have been sequenced completely, but in many cases it was shown that they have replicons which are incompatible with IncQ plasmids. Some characteristics of these plasmids are summarized in Table 1. Initial discoveries of IncQ and IncQ-like plasmids were restricted mainly to bacteria encountered in a medical context.
TABLE 1.
Characteristics of some naturally isolated IncQ and IncQ-like plasmids
Plasmid | Compatible with IncQ | Size (bp) | Source from which isolated | No. of copies per chromosome | Genes and ORFs in addition to backbonea | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSF1010 | E. coli strain 3 | 32 | ||||
R1162 | No | 8,684 | P. aeruginosa | 12 | sulII, strAB | 12, 53 |
R300B | S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (United Kingdom) | 6 | ||||
R678 | No | ±14,000 | S. enterica serovar Dublin (Denmark) | 11 | Sm, Su | 6, 31 |
R684 | No | ±9,500 | Proteus mirabilis (Germany) | 11 | Sm, Su | 6, 31 |
PB165 | NR | ±11,900 | E. coli (United Kingdom) | 9 | Sm, Su | 6, 31 |
p89S | No | ±8,180 | E. coli (clinical) | NR | Su | 75 |
pFM202 | Yes | ±7,100 | Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Spain) | NR | Ap | 73 |
pFM739 | No | ±9,450 | Neisseria sicca (Spain) | NR | Ap, Sm, Su | 74 |
pHD148 | NR | ±7,500 | Haemophilus ducreyi | NR | Su | 1 |
pHD8.1 | NR | ±8,100 | Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae | NR | Sm, Su | 98 |
pAZ1 | NR | ±8,000 | S. enterica serovar Typhimurium type 179 | NR | Su, Tp (DHFR type III) | 24 |
pIE639 | No | ±11,100 | E. coli O20:H− | ±12e | aph(3′)-Id, sat3, strAB, sulII | 94 |
pIE723 | No | ±9,500 | E. coli O147:K88 | ±12e | ant(2")-Ia, strAB, sulII | 94 |
pIE1107 | Nod | 8,520 | Piggery manure | ±12e | aph(3′)-Id, sat3, sulIIb | 94 |
pIE1115 | Nod | 10,687 | Piggery manure | ±12e | linB-like, strAB, sulII | 86 |
pIE1120 | No | ±9,100 | Piggery manure | ±12e | tetA(Y), strAB | 86 |
pIE1130 | Nod | 10,687 | Piggery manure | ±12e | aph(3′)-I, catIII, strAB, sulII | 86 |
pDN1 | Yes | 5,112 | Dichelobacter nodosus | NR | None | 96 |
pTF-FC2 | Yes | 12,190 | A. ferrooxidans | 12–15 | grx, merR-like, ORF43, tnpR,b tnpAb | 17 |
pTC-F14 | Noc | ±14,000 | A. caldus | 12–16 | Unknown | 27 |
The exact gene is given where known; otherwise, the type of antibiotic resistance expressed is given. Ap, ampicillin; Cl, clindamycin; Cm, chloramphenicol; Gm, gentamicin; Km, kanamycin; Lm, lincomycin; Sm, streptomycin; Su, sulfonamide; Tc, tetracycline; To, tobramycin; Tp, trimethiprim. Cl/Lm conferred by linB; Cm conferred by catIII; Km/Nm/Tb conferred by ant(2")-Ia; Km/Nm conferred by aph(3′)-Id; streptothricin resistance conferred by sat3; Sm conferred by strAB; Su conf erred by sulII; Tc conferred by tetA(Y).
Gene incomplete or truncated.
Unidirectionally (asymmetrically) incompatible with RSF1010.
Two oriV-like regions; the nonfunctional oriV is incompatable with IncQ.
E. Tietze, unpublished estimate.
NR, no report.
Screening of Nonmedical Environments for IncQ-Like Plasmids
A study of the detection of IncQ plasmids in bacteria by using PCR amplification and a set of three pairs of IncQ-specific primers indicated that IncQ plasmids were prevalent in total DNA isolated from a variety of samples. These included soils from Germany and Holland and pig manure slurries from Germany (30). Although the presence of IncQ plasmids would have been detected in this investigation, the specific primers used would not have detected plasmids which are related to but different from IncQ plasmids. In another study, antibiotic resistance plasmids were captured in mating experiments in which the bacteria present in pig manure slurry were used as plasmid donors and selectable E. coli and Pseudomonas putida strains were used as recipients (86). From the sequence of plasmid pIE1107, which is IncQ like but different from IncQ plasmids, five sets of primers were designed from regions where plasmids RSF1010 and pIE1107 have conserved nucleotide sequence identity as well as from regions where they are different. These primers were used to detect whether IncQ and IncQ-like plasmids had been captured in the recipient bacteria. A high prevalence of the two groups of IncQ and IncQ-like plasmids (prevalence approximately equal to IncP plasmids) was found, and furthermore a large amount of diversity in genotypic and phenotypic properties was discovered (30, 86). These workers suggested that plasmids with replicons which were incompatible with RSF1010 should be called IncQα and those with compatible replicons, IncQβ.
In contrast to the above studies, other investigators failed to detect IncQ plasmids in DNA hybridization experiments when using bacteria cultured from marine sediment microbial communities (88). Several broad-host-range plasmids were isolated, but none were of the IncQ type (89). Although IncQ plasmids themselves were not detected, this study does not eliminate the possibility that other less highly conserved members of the IncQ plasmid family may have been present. The exact region of the 357-bp IncQ plasmid probe was not given (88), and, depending on conservation of this region among plasmids of the IncQ family and the stringency of the hybridization and washing reactions, IncQ-like members of the IncQ plasmid family may not have been detected by these hybridization experiments.
Types of IncQ-Like Plasmids
Besides the rather limited range of environments that have been screened for the presence of IncQ plasmids, several IncQ-like plasmids have been discovered serendipitously. Plasmid pDN1 was isolated from the anaerobic bacterium, Dichelobacter nodosus, which is the principal causative agent of ovine footrot (96). This (5.1-kb) plasmid is closely related to pIE1107 but contains no antibiotic resistance genes and no other accessory genes. In contrast to the plasmids isolated from medical and animal environments, two IncQ-like plasmids have been isolated from bacteria present in inorganic biomining environments. Plasmid pTF-FC2 was isolated from a strain of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (previously Thiobaciilus ferrooxidans) that was being prepared as an inoculum for a biooxidation plant to treat a gold-bearing arsenopyrite ore concentrate (68). A. ferrooxidans is an acidophilic (optimum pH, 1.5 to 2.5) iron- and sulfur-oxidizing bacterium which is obligately chemolithoautotrophic and has a very low tolerance for organic matter (40). Approximately 15 years later, plasmid pTC-F14 was isolated (27) from a strain of a related bacterium, the moderately thermophilic (50°C), acidophilic (pH 1.3 to 2.0), chemolithoautotrophic, sulfur-oxidizing bacterium, Acidithiobacillus caldus (previously Thiobacillus caldus) (34). This A. caldus strain f was isolated from a pilot biooxidation plant being used to treat a nickel-containing ore concentrate. The nucleotide sequences of six IncQ and IncQ-like plasmids have been published. These are plasmids RSF1010, pIE1107, pIE1115, pIE1130 (last two also captured from piggery manure [86]), pDN1, and pTF-FC2. In addition plasmid, pTC-F14 (27) has been partially sequenced. The characteristics of a selection of IncQ-like plasmids are shown in Table 1, and complete or partial genetic maps of these plasmids are given in Fig. 1.
FIG. 1.
Genetic maps of plasmids of the IncQ family showing the conserved replicon structure, the regions encoding the mobilization genes, and, where present, the accessory genes. Plasmid pDN1 is represented by a line since its gene map is identical to the backbone region of pIE1107. The genetic map of pTC-F14 is incomplete since only a partial nucleotide sequence is available. Genes and structural features: aph(3′)-I, kanamycin and neomycin aminoglycoside phosphotransferase; cac, control of repA and repC regulator; catIII, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; grx, glutaredoxin-like gene; linB-like, linB-like lincosamide nucleotyltransferase; merR-like, merR-like regulator gene; mobA, mobB, mobC, mobD, and mobE, mobilization genes; oriV, origin of vegetative replication; orf1, orf4, orf29, orf43, and orfE, open reading frames of unknown function; oriT, origin of transfer; pasA, pasB, and pasC, plasmid addiction system genes; repA, repB, and repC, replication genes; res, site of cointegrate resolution by transposon resolvase; strA and strB, streptomycin aminoglycoside phosphotransferase; sulII, sulfonamide-resistant dihydropteroate synthase; tnpA, transposase; tnpR, resolvase. Genes which have been inactivated by deletions are indicated by asterisks.
Based on available data from all sequenced members of IncQ-like plasmids, it is evident that the primer sets used would not have enabled the detection of IncQ-like plasmids such as pTF-FC2 or pTC-F14. The prevalence and variety of the IncQ family of plasmids in many environments is therefore unknown, and it is likely that many more types will be discovered.
Host Range
As described above, one of the most remarkable features of IncQ plasmids is their exceptionally broad host range. The list of organisms in which IncQ plasmids and IncQ plasmid-based cloning vectors have been reported to replicate is shown in Table 2. Although possibly not complete, the list includes a wide variety of hosts belonging to the kingdom Bacteria (including gram-negative bacteria, gram-positive bacteria, and cyanobacteria) but no members belonging to the kingdoms Archaea or Eucarya. It has been suggested that the broad-host-range properties of the IncQ plasmids occur because the plasmid possesses many of the genes required for its own replication and this allows it to be more independent of the host replication machinery than are most other plasmids. RSF1010 has genes encoding its own plasmid-specific DNA-binding protein, a helicase, and a primase (19, 80). Scherzinger et al. (77) reported that besides these three essential plasmid-encoded proteins, E. coli host-encoded single-strand-binding protein, DNA gyrase, and the γ subunit of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme were required for RSF1010 replication in vitro. Plasmid replication was independent of the host RNA polymerase, initiator DnaA protein and primosome, DnaB, DnaC, DnaG, and DnaT proteins. This result was consistent with their in vivo results.
TABLE 2.
List illustrating the range of bacteria in which IncQ plasmids or IncQ-derived plasmid vectors can replicate
Host | Plasmid or vector replicon | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|
Acinetobacter sp. | pIE1120 | 85 |
Acidipilium cryptum | pSUP106 | 66 |
Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans | pKMZ1, pKT230 | 44, 63 |
Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans | pBK1 | 28 |
Agrobacterium tumefaciens | RSF1010, pIE1120 | 8, 85 |
Alcaligenes sp. strain BR60 | pMMB66HE | 56 |
Arthrobacter sp. | pKT240, pML10 | 52 |
Bartonella henselae | IncQ vectors | 18 |
Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus | IncQ vectors | 16 |
Brevibacterium methylicum | RSF1010 | 57 |
Burkholderia pseudomallei | pKT230 | 50 |
Caulobacter crescentus | RSF1010 | 9 |
Chlorobium tepidum | pDSK519, pGSS33 | 95 |
Desulfovibrio desulfuricans | RSF1010 derivatives | 4 |
Enterobacter agglomerans | RSF1010 vectors | 84 |
Francisella novicida | RSF1010 derivative | 2 |
Haemophilus parainfluenzae | RSF1010 derivatives | 11 |
Legionella pneumophila | RSF1010 | 81 |
Mycobacterium smegmatis | RSF1010 | 29 |
Pseudoanabaena sp. | pSUP1021, pKT230 | 90 |
Pseudomonas putida | pIE1120 | 85 |
Ralstonia europha | pIE1120 | 85 |
Streptomyces lividans | RSF1010 | 29 |
Synechococcus sp. | pSUP1021, pKT230 | 90 |
Synechocystis sp. | pSUP1021 | 90 |
Investigations into the host range of the IncQ-like plasmids are less extensive. However, plasmids pIE1115 and pIE1130 can be mobilized to and replicate in (albeit with varying stability) Pseudomonas putida, Acinetobacter sp. strain BD14, Ralstonia eutropha, and Agrobacterium tumefaciens (86). Likewise, studies of the ability of pTF-FC2 to replicate in hosts other than A. ferrooxidans indicate that the host range of this IncQ-like plasmid may be as wide as that of RSF1010. Work in the author's laboratory has shown that pTF-FC2 is able to replicate in A. tumefaciens, E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, P. putida, S. enterica serovar Typhimurium, Sinorhizobium meliloti, and Thiobacillus novellus (67). Other workers have reported that plasmid pTF-FC2-based vectors are able replicate in Acidiphilum facilis, Myxococcus xanthus (67), and Pseudomonas fluorescens (37). It is possible that IncQ and IncQ-like plasmids are unable to replicate in certain bacteria but that these negative results have not been reported. For example, attempts to transfer pTF-FC2 into the strict anaerobe Bacteriodes fragilis using a clindamycin resistance gene as the selectable marker were unsuccessful (D. E. Rawlings, unpublished data).
COMPARISON OF PLASMID BACKBONE STRUCTURES
The concept of a plasmid backbone includes genes and sites required for typical plasmid-associated functions such replication, conjugation, and stability (61, 92, 97). The determination of the extent of this backbone may be assisted by comparing features shared by most members of a plasmid family. Plasmids of the IncQ family have a backbone structure consisting of a region required for plasmid mobilization and a region required for replication and maintenance. Not all members have a plasmid stability system, but in the members which do, this system is integrated within the replicon with elements which are essential for replication on either side (Fig. 1). The stability system has therefore also been considered to be part of the plasmid backbone.
Replicon Structure and Mechanism of Replication
A model of the mechanism for the replication of the IncQ plasmids has been reviewed in detail, and only a summary will be presented here (25, 76). The IncQ replicon consists of three genes, repA, repB, and repC, and an oriV region (80). The oriV region contains 3.5 20-bp iterons with 2-bp nucleotide spacers. The iterons exert incompatibility and serve as binding sites for the site-specific DNA-binding protein, RepC (35, 48, 65). Binding of RepC is essential for replication and is thought to introduce conformational changes leading to DNA unwinding in the adjacent AT-rich region (35, 42). This RepC-induced DNA melting serves as an entry site for RepA, a plasmid-specific helicase which unwinds the DNA in the flanking regions. One of these flanking regions contains a large inverted repeat which has two plasmid-specific, single-stranded DNA initiation sites, ssiA and ssiB (35, 39, 49). The ssiA and ssiB sites initiate the priming of single-stranded DNA synthesis on opposite strands in the leftward and rightward directions, respectively (54). None of the conserved amino acid sequence motifs associated with the four helicase superfamilies can be easily identified in the RepA helicases of the IncQ plasmid family (33). Initiation of DNA synthesis is dependent on the specific plasmid-encoded primase, RepB (RepB′) (38). The RepB primase occurs in two forms, a 78-kDa MobA-RepB fusion protein (Fig. 1) and a 36-kDa RepB′ form, which is translated from an initiation codon downstream of and in the same reading frame as the fusion protein (76, 80). The model for plasmid replication predicts that it takes place by a strand displacement mechanism.
The overall layout of the genes and many of the other features of the members of the IncQ-like plasmid family are very similar. All IncQ-like plasmids have genes which encode orthologs of the IncQ RepA helicase, the RepB′ primase, and the RepC iteron-specific DNA-binding protein (Fig. 1).
Comparison of replication proteins.
Amino acid sequence alignments of the three Rep proteins have indicated that based on protein sequence comparisons, the IncQ plasmid family may be divided into two major groups (Fig. 2). Plasmids pTF-FC2 and pTC-F14 comprise one group, and plasmids RSF1010, pIE1107, pIE1115, pIE1130, and pDN1 make up the other. The RepC DNA-binding proteins are the most highly conserved of the Rep proteins, with 62% amino acid sequence identity between the different groups and >74% identity between members of the same group. Based on the amount of sequence variation between groups, the RepA helicases are intermediately conserved, with 44% amino acid identity between groups and >81% identity within groups. At only 15% amino acid sequence identity, the RepB′ primases are poorly conserved between groups, but at >74% amino acid identity, they are fairly well conserved within groups.
FIG. 2.
Phylogenetic relationships between Rep proteins of the IncQ plasmid family. Percentages represent percent amino acid sequence identities.
Given the sequence similarity between Rep protein orthologs, it is of interest to know whether any of the Rep proteins can functionally complement mutants in any of the others. Experiments of this type have been carried out between the IncQ replicons of plasmid R300B and pTF-FC2. The oriV region of pTF-FC2 could be complemented in trans by its own replication proteins but not by those of R300B. Frameshift point mutations within the repA and repC genes of pTF-FC2 were constructed, and although these mutants could be complemented by homologous unmutated repA and repC genes they could not be complemented by the repA and repC genes present on R300B (21). By cloning the oriV region of pTF-FC2 into a priming-deficient M13 phage and testing for an increase in plaque size, it was shown that RepB′ of pTF-FC2 acted as a primase on its own oriV (22) while the R300B repB gene was unable to prime the oriV of pTF-FC2 (Rawlings, unpublished). Together, these studies indicate that the RepA, RepB′, and RepC proteins of the R300B were unable, individually or in combination, to substitute for the orthologous proteins of plasmid pTF-FC2. Plasmids pTF-FC2 and R300B belong to different IncQ-like family groups, and it is possible that complementation between the more similar Rep proteins within a plasmid group might occur. However, initial studies using the oriV regions of the fairly closely related plasmids pTF-FC2 and pTC-F14 showed that either set of replication proteins was able to complement only its own oriV (27).
Origins of replication.
The location of oriV regions relative to the replication proteins differs between the IncQ and the IncQ-like plasmids. In the IncQ-like plasmids, pDN1, pIE1107, pIE1115, pIE1130, pTF-FC2, and pTC-F14, the functional oriV is situated immediately downstream of the repC gene (Fig. 1). In plasmids pTF-FC2 and pTC-F14, this association is so close that the oriV region begins within the open reading frame of the COOH terminus of the RepC protein. In contrast, in the IncQ plasmid RSF1010 there is a DNA fragment of about 3.65 kp containing the sulII, strA, and strB genes, which separates the oriV region of the IncQ plasmids from the repC gene. The physical linkage of repC and oriV is therefore not a requirement and does not appear to confer a competitive disadvantage since the IncQ plasmids are widely distributed, especially in medical environments. Plasmid pIE1107 is unusual in that it has two oriV-like regions. oriVa is almost identical in location and sequence to the oriV of the IncQ plasmids. There is, however, a 19-bp deletion in the 8-bp stem-loop region which follows the AT-rich region, and oriVa is nonfunctional for plasmid replication (93). Plasmids pIE1115 and pIE1130 also have duplicate oriVa regions similar to pIE1107 but without the 19-bp deletion.
One of the most distinguishing characteristics of the oriV regions of members of the IncQ plasmid family is the presence of iterons (directly repeated sequences) with a 22-bp unit length. In plasmids RSF1010, pDN1, pIE1107, pIE1115, and pIE1130, the iterons are 20 bp long with 2-bp spacers, whereas in pTF-FC2 and pTC-F14 the iterons are 22-bp long without spacers. The number of iterons varies from three to five (Fig. 3), with 10 of the nucleotides within the direct repeats being conserved among all members of the family. A short distance from the direct repeats is a GC-rich region of 28 bp followed by an AT-rich region of 31 bp. It has been proposed that RepC-mediated DNA melting occurs at this AT-rich region (mentioned earlier), which allows access to the plasmid-encoded RepA helicase. Plasmid pTC-F14 is an exception in that no clear GC-rich region is apparent. Figure 4 shows an alignment of the direct-repeat GC-rich and AT-rich regions of five members of the IncQ plasmid family. The respective oriVa-like regions of pIE1107, pIE1115, and pIE1130 have been omitted because they have identical nucleotide sequences to RSF1010 within the region shown. There is 55% nucleotide sequence identity among all IncQ-type oriV regions within this region, with a 14- of -15-bp consensus sequence identity in the region immediately downstream of the AT-rich region. There is an abrupt decrease in the consensus nucleotide sequence identity in the repC-distal region adjacent to that shown in Fig. 4. The region where the oriV nucleotide sequence alignment is poor includes the region containing the IncQ plasmid ssiA and ssiB sites. None of the other members of the IncQ-like plasmid family have an extended inverted-repeat region (40-bp stem and 40-bp loop) identical to that present in the IncQ plasmids (48). Members of the IncQ-like plasmids have other sequences capable of forming stem-loop-like structures in the AT-rich and repC-distal oriV region (Fig. 3), but the biological activity of these has not been tested. An exception is pTF-FC2, where an exonuclease III-created deletion midway through the cirB stem-loop resulted in poor plasmid replication and a greatly reduced copy number (20).
FIG. 3.
Schematic diagram of the structural features within the active oriV and nonactive oriV-like regions of IncQ-like plasmids. oriVa and oriVb indicates duplicate oriV regions in the same plasmid. oriVa indicates the nonfunctional but incompatibility active oriV-like region. Arrows pointing in the same direction represent directly repeated sequences and arrows pointing toward each other inverted repeat sequences capable of forming stem-loop structures. Numbers above the arrows indicate the number of bases conserved in imperfectly conserved iterons, and #11/20 indicates a truncated 11bp iteron. A+T, on A+T-rich region; C+G, a G+C-rich region; ssiA and ssiB; single strand initiation sites. DNA synthesis proceeds in a single direction toward the right-hand side from ssiA and toward the left from ssiB. The sequence to the left of the highly conserved 14/15-bp region is more highly conserved than that to to the right.
FIG. 4.
Nucleotide sequence alignment of the highly conserved region within the functional oriV of the IncQ-like plasmids. Direct repeats are shown by arrows above the sequence, G+C and A+T regions as shown by solid lines, and the most highly conserved 15-bp region is shown by a broken line above the sequence. Sequences of plasmids pDN1 and pIE1115 have been omitted because they are almost identical to that of pIE1107 within the part of the oriV region shown. Plasmids pDN1 and pIE1115 have 1- and 2-bp mismatches, respectively, compared to pIE1107.
Incompatibility groups.
Incompatibility is the inability of coresident plasmids to be stably inherited in the absence of external selection (58). Replicon-associated incompatibility is believed to arise due to the inability of the cell to correct fluctuations in copy number between plasmids that have elements of their replication machinery in common. It has been established that the iterons of the IncQ plasmid family are themselves able to exert plasmid incompatibility (48, 65). Since the sequences of the iterons of plasmids of the IncQ family are related, it has been of interest to determine which members of the family are incompatible. All incompatibility testing has been carried out with E. coli host strains. Plasmids pIE1107 and RSF1010 were found to be incompatible due to the IncQ-identical iterons present in the nonfunctional oriVa-like region (93). If this region was deleted, the resulting oriVb-containing plasmid, pIE1108, was fully compatible with the IncQ plasmids. The more recently discovered plasmids pIE1115 and pIE1130 also have nonfunctional IncQ-identical iterons, which make them incompatible with RSF1010 (E. Tietze, unpublished data). If these are deleted, plasmid RSF1010 belongs to one incompatibility group, plasmids pIE1108, pIE1115, and pDN1 belong to a second group, and plasmid pIE1130 belongs to a third group. Plasmids pTF-FC2 and pTC-F14 are also fully compatible with each other. However, the incompatibility relationship between the members of the IncQ plasmid family is complicated.
Since the most closely related pairs of plasmids (RSF1010/pIE1107 and pTF-FC2/pTC-F14) were fully compatible with each other, it was surprising to discover that the two pairs of the less highly conserved plasmids were asymmetrically (unidirectionally) incompatible. When the incoming selected plasmid was pIE1108, it would displace a resident pTC-F14 or a resident pTF-FC2 (27). However, if pIE1108 was the resident plasmid and pTC-F14 or pTF-FC2 was the selected incoming plasmid, these plasmids could not displace pIE1108. If plasmid RSF1010 was the incoming selected plasmid, it would displace a resident pTC-F14 but not a resident pTF-FC2. Likewise, an incoming selected pTC-F14 or pTF-FC2 would not displace a resident RSF1010. What makes the displacement of the pTC-F14 and pTF-FC2 by the IncQ plasmids more surprising is that both of these plasmids have a pas toxin-antitoxin, postsegregational killing system (27, 87), but this did not give them a competitive advantage over the IncQ plasmid which lacks such a system. The two plasmids isolated from heterotrophic bacteria clearly had an advantage over the plasmids isolated from the acidophilic, chemolithoautotrophic E. coli. One can speculate whether this is because the promoters and other functions of the plasmids isolated from bacteria which have a similar physiology to E. coli are more efficiently expressed in E. coli than are the plasmids from the chemolithoautotrophic bacteria. It would be interesting to know whether the situation is reversed in a chemolithoautotrophic host. Due to the rudimentary genetic system of A. ferrooxidans and A. caldus, incompatibility experiments are far more difficult to carry out in these hosts.
Plasmid copy number.
The copy numbers of several members of the IncQ plasmid family have been reported (25) (Table 1). It has been estimated that RSF1010 has a copy number of 10 to 12 per chromosome in E. coli and P. aeruginosa (76). This is approximately the same as the 12 to 15 copies (20) or 10 to 14 copies (87) per chromosome estimated for pTF-FC2 and the 12 to 16 copies estimated for pTC-F14 in both E. coli and A. caldus. Like other iteron-containing plasmids, the copy number of IncQ plasmids is affected by the number of functional replicon-associated iterons. Becker and Meyer (7) determined the effect of inserting extra iterons on the copy number of a derivative of plasmid R1162. With two additional iterons, the number of the IncQ replicons dropped from 10–12 to only 5–7 copies per chromosome, and with three or four extra iterons it dropped to only 4–6 copies. They found that the low-copy-number derivatives were lost in the absence of selection and suggested that because R1162 does not possess a plasmid partitioning or stability system, it requires a high copy number to ensure stable inheritance by random distribution. It was proposed that this requirement for a high plasmid copy number placed a substantial metabolic burden on the cell which could enhance the selection of low-copy-number variants (7). Low-copy-number plasmids may be easily lost from the population, which favors the acquisition of accessory genes, which require a high copy number to function. This may place a restriction on the type of accessory genes which can be accommodated by the plasmid. It has been observed that several IncQ and related plasmids do have a substantial variety of accessory genes (Table 1) (Tietze, unpublished) but that many of these do not have consensus promoters or ribosome-binding sites. These genes may require a high copy number to ensure a sufficient level of gene expression. Copy numbers of plasmids of the IncQ family are remarkably consistent, at between 10 to 16 per chromosome, in spite of the number of iterons varying from three (pTF-FC2) to five (pTC-F14). In the IncQ-like plasmids with more than three iterons, the additional iterons all vary slightly from the consensus three. This variation takes the form of an extra base, a missing base, or a deletion of one of the bases of the 2-bp spacer region. It has been shown that relatively minor changes in iterons reduce or eliminate their functionality (55), and it may be that the sometimes small changes in the iterons (above the basic three) are sufficient to reduce their biological activity to maintain the copy number of IncQ and IncQ-like plasmids within the 10 to 16 copy range. Although this speculation remains to be tested, indications from standardized plasmid isolations are that all of the pIE-named plasmids have a copy number comparable to that of RSF1010 (Tietze, unpublished). It is possible that plasmids which have a toxin-antitoxin stability system (e.g., pTF-FC2 [see below]) would not have needed to depend on copy number to prevent plasmid loss and could have tolerated a lower copy number than would plasmids where no stability system has been detected (e.g., RSF1010). However, toxin-antitoxin systems confer a relatively moderate (2.5- to 100-fold) increase in plasmid stability, and it is interesting that the “standard” copy number of plasmids of the IncQ family has been preserved irrespective of whether a stability system is present.
Mobilization Regions
Although none are self-transmissible, all plasmids of the IncQ family may be mobilized at high frequency in the presence of self-transmissible helper plasmids. Not all conjugative plasmids are equally effective at mobilizing IncQ or related plasmids, but conjugative plasmids of the E. coli IncPα (e.g., RK2/RP4/R68) and IncPβ (e.g., R751) groups (53, 69) are particularly efficient mobilizers of these plasmids. By using helper plasmids, the IncQ plasmids have been successfully mobilized to a large number of hosts including a wide range of gram-negative bacteria, several gram-positive bacteria including Arthrobacter spp. (52), Streptomyces lividans, and Mycobacterium smegmatis (29), cyanobacteria such as Synechococcus (43), and plant (13) and animal (99) cells. Likewise pTF-FC2 has been mobilized from E. coli to Pseudomonas fluorescens (37) and from Agrobacterium tumefaciens to plant cells (Rawlings, unpublished). RSF1010 can be efficiently mobilized by several other conjugation systems. For example, for mobilization into plant cells (13) and between agrobacteria (8), the T-DNA transfer apparatus of A. tumefaciens was used. RSF1010 plasmids can also be efficiently mobilized by chromosomally located icm/dot macrophage-killing virulence system of Legionella pneumophila (81, 83). Furthermore, it has been shown that some components of a type IV secretion system of L. pneumophila can substitute for some components of the icm/dot system that are required for RSF1010 mobilization (82).
Unlike the uniform replicons of the global IncQ plasmid family, all of which have repA, repB, and repC genes as well as several conserved features of the oriV in common, the mobilization systems are of two distinct types. The IncQ plasmid RSF1010, as well as pIE1107, pIE1115, pIE1130, and pDN1, comprise one mobilization subgroup and have a three-Mob-protein “IncQ-type” system (Fig. 1) which has substantial similarity to the two-Mob-protein system of A. ferrooxidans plasmid pTF1 (23). In contrast, the IncQ-like plasmids pTF-FC2 and pTC-F14 have a five-Mob-protein mobilization system (71) with a close resemblance to the Tra1 systems of the IncP plasmids and form a second subgroup.
IncQ-type systems.
IncQ and other plasmids of that subgroup have a mobilization system which consists of MobA, MobB, and MobC proteins and an oriT-containing region. MobA is a multifunctional protein consisting of an N-terminal relaxase (78, 79) and a C-terminal DNA primase (36). The two domains appear to be able to function independently of each other. The C-terminal domain is synthesized from the same region and reading frame as the RepB protein, which is associated with vegetative plasmid replication. The relaxase activity is responsible for nicking the DNA at the oriT site, and the MobA primase activity is required for initiation of DNA replication that takes place during conjugal transfer. MobB and MobC serve as accessory proteins which enhance nic site cleavage and DNA transfer. MobB is synthesized from within the mobA gene but in a different reading frame, while MobC is transcribed divergently from a gene which lies on the opposite side of oriT (80) (Fig. 1). It has been proposed that MobB enhances relaxosome stability and nic site cleavage (64) while MobC helps unwind the DNA in the vicinity of the nic site, allowing easier access to the MobA relaxase (101). Interestingly, plasmid pTF1 appears to have only two mobilization proteins, MobL, which has an amino acid sequence related to the first 386 amino acids (aa) of the N-terminal relaxase region of MobA, and MobS, which is related to MobC (23). No equivalent of the accessory MobB protein appears to be present, and no open reading frames previously identified with DNA primase activity have been found on this 6,657-bp plasmid (47). A dendrogram showing the sequence relationship between the relaxase portion (assumed to be the N-terminal 400 aa) of the 709 aa MobA protein of RSF1010 is shown in Fig. 5. There are clearly three groups of MobA relaxases related to the IncQ plasmids. One group contains plasmids with replicons related to the IncQ plasmids as well as pAB6 and pSC101; a second group contains pTF1, pNGR23, and the Ti plasmids; and a third group contains plasmids of gram-positive bacteria. There are few plasmids in the database containing proteins related to the IncQ MobC accessory proteins; MobS of pTF1 is the most clearly related.
FIG. 5.
Phylogenetic relationship between the MobA and MobC proteins of the IncQ-1-type plasmids and their comparison with related relaxases of mobilizable and self-transmissible plasmids. Since in the IncQ-1 plasmids the MobA proteins exist as a MobA-RepB fusion, only the N-terminal 400 aa was considered for comparison with other MobA-related proteins. The protein equivalent to MobC in pTF1 is called MobS. Percentages are percent amino acid sequence identities. GenBank accession numbers are as follows: pMRC01, g3582197; pIP501, L39769; pGO1, g1245474; pSK41, g3676420; pNGR23, P55418; pTi-Sakura, g6498282; pTi-A6NC, g2499023; pTi-C58, g2499022; pTF1, g127224; pIE1107, Z74787; pIE1115, AJ293027; pDN1, Y19120; pIE1130, AJ271879; RSF1010, M28829; pSC101, P14492; pAB6, g4884735.
IncP-related systems.
The alternate mobilization system of the IncQ plasmid family consists of five proteins (MobA, MobB, MobC, MobD, and MobE) and an oriT-containing region (71). These proteins have low but clear amino acid sequence similarity to the TraI, TraJ, TraK, TraL, and TraM proteins of the Tra1 region of the IncP plasmids, respectively (71). This relationship between the mobilization region of this group of IncQ-like plasmids and the TraI region of the IncP plasmids also applies to the order of the genes and the divergent nature of their transcription (Fig. 6). In the IncP plasmids, TraI is a relaxase of between 732 aa (RP4) (61) and 747 aa (R751) (92), and 409 aa of the N-terminal region of the MobA protein of pTF-FC2 has 26% sequence identity to the 458-aa N-terminal region of the RP4 TraI. TraJ is a DNA-binding protein that is thought to alter the local DNA structure and allow the TraI relaxase to access its binding site (60, 100). TraK is an accessory protein, also with DNA-binding activity, which is believed to wrap around a ±180-bp region of DNA near oriT, changing the superhelicity and further assisting TraI to access its target site (100, 102). The functions of TraL and TraM are unknown, although TraL has a Walker A/ATP/GTP-binding site (92).
FIG. 6.
Comparison of the regions involved in the mobilization of plasmids pRA2, pTF-FC2, and the IncPα plasmid RP4/RK2. Broken lines linking plasmids show the regions with amino acid sequence similarity.
Origins of transfer.
Transfer origins play an essential role in the initiation of transfer-associated DNA replication and in the processing and transport of DNA from a donor to a recipient cell (46). Through comparison of a wide variety of transfer origins, five families of oriT sequences which show strong nucleotide conservation in the vicinity of the nic site have been identified (46, 100). The two- to three-Mob-protein IncQ-like plasmids belong to an oriT family which includes pTF1, pSC101, and the oriT of pTiC58. The IncQ plasmids are all highly conserved within this region, except that R1162 has a rare 1-bp mismatch compared with other members of the IncQ group (Fig. 7). The five-Mob-protein IncQ-like plasmids belong to a different oriT group, which includes the IncP plasmids RP4 and R751 and the left and right borders of the T-DNA of the Ti plasmids (Fig. 7).
FIG. 7.
Two families of oriT nick regions to which the IncQ-family plasmids belong. Triangles show the positions of strand cleavage in plasmids for which this has been determined.
ACCESSORY DNA
In addition to plasmid backbone DNA, most plasmids of the IncQ family have accessory DNA of some sort. The exception is plasmid pDN1, which appears to consist only of plasmid backbone. It is possible that plasmids without accessory genes are more common than recognized but that since these plasmids lack selectable markers they are not easily detected and therefore appear to be more rare than they actually are. As may be expected, the accessory DNA from plasmids isolated from medical or animal environments contain mainly antibiotic resistance genes, but these are also the markers for which most screening has been done. Although initial isolates of IncQ plasmids possessed mainly sulfonamide and streptomycin resistance genes, IncQ and IncQ-like plasmids may encode a wide variety of resistance genes (Table 1). Like many antibiotic resistance plasmids, acquisition of many of these genes has been as a result of transposon, insertion sequence, or integron activity. In RSF1010, the antibiotic resistance genes clearly have a different G+C content and codon usage compared with the rest of the plasmid backbone, which indicates that they have been acquired relatively recently (80). With pIE723, the aadB antibiotic resistance cassette has been inserted into a secondary site in plasmid RSF1010 as a result of integron activity in such a way that the insertion is stable (70).
It has been particularly interesting to investigate what types of genes are encoded by the accessory DNA of IncQ-like plasmids from the chemolithoautotrophic bacteria. In pTF-FC2, there is clear evidence of transposon Tn21 activity (17). Two 38-bp terminal repeated sequences of identical nucleotide sequence to one of the ends of Tn21 were present. Although only inactive remnants of a transposase and resolvase remained, the terminal repeats and res (cointegrate resolution) site were functional if Tn21 transposase and resolvase was provided in trans. In addition to the above features, the 3.5-kb region between the Tn21 ends contained a glx-like (glutaredoxin) gene, which was functional in E. coli, as well as a merR-like gene and a 406-aa-protein-encoding open reading frame resembling a 12-transmembrane segment multidrug transport protein (62), for which no expression could be detected in E. coli. The glx gene could complement E. coli trx (thioredoxin) mutants for a number of thioredoxin-dependent functions (17). It was able to substitute as electron donor in place of thioredoxin for the reduction of AsV to AsIII by ArsC, the product of chromosomally located arsenate reductase gene of A. ferrooxidans (14; B. G. Butcher and D. E. Rawlings unpublished data). Since A. ferrooxidans strains are exposed to high levels of arsenic in arsenopyrite and other arsenic-containing ores, this may be the purpose for the grx gene being on pTF-FC2. The nucleotide sequence of the region of pTC-F14 most likely to contain accessory DNA has not yet been completed.
EVOLUTIONARY ASPECTS
Two IncQ-Type Plasmid Groups Identified
Based on a comparison of features such as the amino acid sequence similarities of the RepA, RepB, and RepC proteins, as well as the relatedness of the operon structure, Mob proteins, and oriT areas of the mobilization regions, there are at least two major groups within the IncQ plasmid family. We propose to call these plasmids IncQ groups 1 and 2. If additional groups are discovered, these could be named groups 3, 4, and so on. How many of these major groups may exist is uncertain and possibly awaits the investigation of plasmids in bacteria from environments other than those so far examined. Based on iteron sequence similarity and incompatibility, the two major groups can be subdivided into subgroups termed IncQ-1α for plasmids which have a functional oriV incompatible with RSF1010, IncQ-1β for those with an oriV incompatible with pIE1107, pIE1115, or pDN1; and IncQ-1γ for those with an oriV incompatible with pIE1130. We propose that the subgroups of the second group of IncQ-like plasmids should be named IncQ-2α for pTF-FC2 and IncQ-2β for pTC-F14. This scheme is consistent with that currently in use for the IncPα and IncPβ subgroups of IncP plasmids.
Sizes of Plasmids of the IncQ-Type Family
The single-strand displacement mechanism of replication, together with the plasmid-associated replication proteins, appears to have conferred exceptionally broad-host-range properties to plasmids of this type. In addition, an advantage may be derived from the plasmid being independent of the host priming system for lagging-strand DNA synthesis. A disadvantage of this mechanism of replication is that during replication, up to half of the plasmid will be present as a single-stranded intermediate, even if only for short periods. Single-stranded DNA is more reactive and much less physically stable than double-stranded DNA. One may speculate about whether the strand displacement replication mechanism places a limit on the size that may be attained by plasmids that replicate by this process. It is interesting that the natural plasmids which belong to the IncQ family are all fairly small, ranging in size from 5.1 kb (pDN1) to 14.0 kb (pTC-F14). None of these plasmids are self-transmissible, possibly because the coding capacity required for the synthesis of the conjugation apparatus is too large to be stably accommodated in a replicon of this type. It would be interesting to determine whether there is a difference in the limit to the size of plasmid that can be efficiently supported by a replicon of the strand displacement type compared with mechanisms in which leading- and lagging-DNA-strand synthesis takes place simultaneously.
Relaxase-Primase Fusion
As discussed above, the mobilization regions of the IncQ family plasmid backbone are of two different types (an IncQ-type and an IncP-type); however, in both types the relaxase, which is an essential activity for mobilization, has been fused to a primase, which is required for plasmid replication. A mobilization-replication fusion of this type does not appear to have happened between the IncQ-like mob region and non-IncQ-like replicon of pTF1 or between the IncP-type mob region and the unique replicon (unrelated to either IncP or IncQ plasmid families) of the non-self-transmissible plasmid pRA2 (45). Why a mob-rep fusion should have occurred in all plasmids of the IncQ family plasmids is unclear. The fusion in plasmid R1162 occurs because the MobA-linked primase is essential for plasmid mobilization (36). However, the mob-rep fusion does not appear to be required for the mobilization of all IncQ-type plasmids. In plasmid pTF-FC2, a ClaI site is naturally located within the coding region of this relaxase-primase fusion in such a way that the two activities of this multifunctional protein can be separated. By removal of DNA from either side of the ClaI site, it has been shown that each part can be expressed independently of the other and that only the relaxase portion is required for efficient mobilization of pTF-FC2 and only the primase portion is required for replication (22, 71). This indicates that the two parts of the large fusion protein can function independently of each other. The reason why both parts of the relaxase-primase protein have remained fused in the form of a large open reading frame so as to link the replicon and mobilization properties of the plasmid is still a mystery.
Nucleotide Sequence Composition
The nucleotide composition of the members of the IncQ plasmid family investigated to date is approximately 60% G+C (Table 3). Scholtz et al. (80) showed that the codon bias of the genes comprising the plasmid backbone (replication/maintenance and mobilization functions) was markedly different from that of the genes encoding antibiotic resistance. This was interpreted as indicating that the antibiotic resistance genes had been incorporated more recently in the evolution of RSF1010. The separation of the repC genes from the oriV region by antibiotic resistance genes in RSF1010 but not the other members of the IncQ plasmid family is consistent with the view that the antibiotic resistance genes were inserted after a functional replicon had evolved. In Table 3 we present calculations of the moles percent G+C ratios for the plasmid sequences as a whole as well as separate moles percent G+C ratios for the plasmid backbones and accessory DNA (frequently antibiotic or transposon-like regions). The difference in G+C content for the plasmid backbones compared with the accessory DNA for the IncQ-1α, IncQ-1β, and IncQ-1γ plasmids ranges from 7.7% for RSF1010 to 11.4% for pIE1130. For pTF-FC2, the difference between the accessory DNA (within the 38-bp Tn21-like transposon ends) is only 0.8%. This suggests that insertion of a Tn21-like transposon into pTF-FC2 is an evolutionarily old event or that the source of the transposon was an organism with a G+C ratio close to that of the pTF-FC2 backbone. This second possibility is likely since the G+C content of A. ferrooxidans genome is 59%, which is very close to the average content for pTF-FC2.
TABLE 3.
Comparison of G+C contents of whole plasmid, backbones, and accessory DNA of sequenced plasmids of the IncQ family
Plasmid | G+C content (mol%)
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Whole plasmid | Plasmid backbone | Accessory DNA | Difference | |
RSF1010 | 60.9 | 63.9 | 56.2 | 7.7 |
pIE1107 | 59.1 | 62.0 | 54.1 | 7.9 |
pIE1115 | 56.2 | 62.1 | 51.0 | 9.1 |
pIE1130 | 57.0 | 62.2 | 50.8 | 11.4 |
pDN1 | 62.3 | 62.3 | NAb | NA |
pTF-FC2 | 59.8 | 60.0 | 59.2 | 0.8 |
pTC-F14 | NDc | 59.3a | ND | ND |
Replicon only.
NA, not applicable.
ND, not determined.
Evolution of New Incompatibility Groups
The finding of several IncQ-like plasmids with more than one oriV region and the unidirectional (asymmetrical) incompatibility of these plasmids toward RSF1010 is intriguing. A model for the diversification of plasmid incompatibility has been proposed by Sykora (91), and its relevance to the IncQ plasmid family has been discussed by Tietze (93) and Osborn et al. (59). According to this model, plasmid cointegrate formation can serve as mechanism for the evolution of new incompatibility groups. Cointegrate plasmids with two compatible origins of replication have an advantage over the double-plasmid state, where the two plasmids exist as separate compatible units. Each of the separate plasmids may be eliminated by invasion of an incompatible plasmid, whereas with a cointegrate, the incompatible replicon is saved from elimination by the other replicon. Cointegrate plasmids may allow for the evolution of new rep genes and incompatibility groups because conservative selection of one of the replicons is relaxed. Applying the model to the IncQ plasmid family, the presence of duplicate replicons would allow for the rep genes and the target iterons of one of the replicons to accumulate mutations, resulting in pseudogenes and altered iterons. In an environment where the functional replicon could be displaced, there will be selective pressure to restore the cointegrate state in which both replicons are functional. However, because the genes and iterons have structurally diverged, the restored replicon may have a new incompatibility specificity. Should the old rep gene be inactivated or the cointegrate be resolved, the new rep genes and iterons would come under strong selection to function as an efficient, independent, and competitive replicon. The result of this process is that an IncQ-like plasmid of a new incompatibility type would be formed.
As pointed out by Tietze (93) plasmids which have two oriV regions, such as pIE1107 and pIE1130, could have been derived from cointegrate formation between two plasmids followed by partial deletion of one of the replicons. An alternate explanation is that the second oriV could have been acquired by recombination with the oriVa-containing region of a different IncQ-type plasmid. Although retention of two oriV regions could be a driving force for further evolution, there is another possible reason for two oriV regions in the case of an environment like piggery manure. This environment would appear to be populated by cells containing a large variety of plasmids, including several types of IncQ or IncQ-related plasmids. A plasmid which retained an oriV with incompatibility to IncQ plasmids but which replicated using an alternate compatible IncQ-like oriV would have a distinct selective advantage in such an environment. Cointegrate plasmids of this type would not be displaced by IncQ plasmids, but since they have an IncQ incompatibility determinant associated with the nonessential oriV, they would be able to reduce the copy number and ultimately displace IncQ plasmids from a host cell. For example, the nonfunctional, RSF1010-identical, oriV-like region of plasmid pIE1107 is able to displace the IncQ plasmid RSF1010 but is itself not displaced by RSF1010 because it uses an alternate RSF1010-compatible replicon for its own replication. This could provide a plasmid like pIE1107 (e.g., pIE1115 and pIE1130) with a distinct competitive advantage in a densely populated plasmid-rich environment like piggery manure. It is interesting that plasmid pDN1, which has a very similar core region to pIE1107, has only a single oriV (Fig. 1), possibly because competition from invading plasmids is not as fierce in the soil (sheep footrot) environment in which it occurs.
There is a tension between the idea of having a second oriV serving as a driving force for evolution or as an additional incompatibility determinant. To serve as an element for evolution, the oriV would need to accumulate mutations, whereas to serve as an additional incompatibility determinant, it would need to remain relatively unaltered so as retain the same incompatibility as the cointegrate plasmids most serious competitors. Interestingly, the secondary oriV regions of pIE1107, pIE1115, and pIE1130 have retained identical iteron sequences and hence the same incompatibility as the IncQ plasmids. Even the iteron-flanking region which contains the ssiA and ssiB sites has remained almost free of mutations. It is difficult to know whether this apparent sequence stability is as a consequence of a recent acquisition or whether there is strong selection for an unaltered secondary oriV to enable the plasmid to outcompete plasmids of the same incompatibility group as the extra oriV. Since only the oriV and not a second copy of the rep genes of the second cointegrate has been retained, the additional oriV probably serves as a means of giving a plasmid like pIE1107 a competitive advantage rather than being a means for the evolution of a new replicon.
Acquisition of Regulation Genes
Regulation of the genes associated with the replication and mobilization functions of the IncQ plasmids RSF1010 and R1162 has been investigated in detail. Four promoters associated with the expression of these core functions have been identified, as well as an autoregulatory gene termed cac (control of repAC) (51). Regulation of the other members of the IncQ plasmid family is largely uninvestigated. However, from an examination of the IncQ-like plasmids, only pIE1130 has a gene or open reading frame with sequence similarity to the cac gene or gene product. This implies that the regulatory functions of the others must be substantially different. The 350-bp region, which is located between the rep and mob genes of pIE1107, pIE1115, and pDN1, contains a small 78-aa-protein-encoding open reading frame, which may serve as a rep or mob gene regulator. The G+C content of this region of pIE1107 is 48%, compared with 64% along the mob and rep genes (59). Similarly, it has been pointed out that the G+C content of the gene for the OrfE protein adjacent to the cac gene of RSF1010 differs significantly from the rep and mob genes. This observation has been used to argue that this region has been recently acquired (80). Although evidence of recent acquisition of regulatory genes is not fully convincing, the IncQ plasmid family has more variation in this region than do other regions of their backbone structure.
The IncQ-like plasmid group 2 also possess small genes within the mob-rep intergenic region. Surprisingly, these proteins appear to have nothing to do with replication control but constitute a toxin-antitoxin proteic plasmid stability system named pas (plasmid addiction system) (87). Evidence that the pas genes do not encode regulatory proteins was provided by the introduction of a frameshift mutation within the pasA antitoxin gene. This resulted in very sick E. coli host cells and in a strong selection for the creation of two different types of spontaneous pas deletions. In one of these deletions, almost the whole of the pas system had been lost and the plasmid was able to replicate in E. coli with a copy number that was unaltered from that of the original replicon (87). The source of the pas system is unknown, but at 60%, the G+C content of the pas region is no different from that of the rest of the pTF-FC2 plasmid.
In the IncQ plasmid RSF1010, the oriT site is a major site of plasmid regulation including plasmid replication (26). However, this may not apply to all IncQ-type plasmids because although the regulation of mobilization genes of pTF-FC2 also occurs at the oriT region (72), the replicon can function independently of the mobilization region at a copy number that is indistinguishable from that in the intact plasmid.
Counterselection for Restriction Enzyme Recognition Sites
DNA which enters a new host during conjugation may be subject to digestion by restriction endonucleases which cleave DNA that has not been modified by cognate methyltransferases (3, 10). Promiscuous broad-host-range plasmids are likely to encounter different restriction modification systems when entering different hosts. One of the strategies that plasmids have acquired to prevent cleavage by restriction enzymes is the use of antirestriction mechanisms (15). However, these tend to target specific restriction enzymes and do not confer universal protection. The elimination of restriction enzyme cleavage sites is a more universal protection mechanism. For example, in the broad-host-range IncP plasmids, type II restriction endonuclease sites are (with two exceptions) particularly underrepresented on the backbone of broad-host-range plasmid RP4 relative to the chromososome of P. aeruginosa, a natural host bacterium which has a similar G+C ratio (97). It has previously been noted that the replicon of the IncQ-like plasmid pTF-FC2 had remarkably few cleavage sites for the commonly used type II restriction enzymes (21). Rather than examine the sequences of the IncQ-like plasmids for all restriction enzymes, we have used the strategy of Wilkins et al. (97) and determined the frequency of occurrence of all 64 6-bp sequences with twofold rotational symmetry. These 6-bp palindromes are the most common class of recognition sequence for DNA cleavage by type II restriction enzymes. Each plasmid as a whole was searched for the occurrence of these palindromes, and this search was repeated separately for the backbone and accessory DNA regions. The frequency has been calculated as the average number of base pairs per palindrome occurrence and is shown in Table 4. In all four plasmids examined, there is a markedly lower frequency of occurrence of the 64 6-bp palindromes in the plasmid backbone (one site every 137 to 321 bp) compared with the accessory DNA (one site every 57 to 90 bp). This difference in frequency is most noticeable for pTF-FC2. In this plasmid, no 6-bp palindrome occurs more than once, with the exception of TTGCAA, which occurs seven times. However, no restriction enzyme has been identified which recognizes this palindrome, and it may be that there has been no selection against its presence. One interpretation of the reduced occurrence of 6-bp palindromes in plasmid backbones is that these structures are relatively ancient compared with the accessory DNA, which in most cases is a result of recent transposition. Selection for the elimination of restriction enzyme cleavage sites from the backbone structures of plasmids of the IncQ family may have taken place as a consequence of their promiscuous nature, whereas this selection has been absent from the accessory DNA, which has presumably been acquired from narrow-host-range plasmids or chromosomes.
TABLE 4.
Number and frequency of occurrence of the 64 6-bp palindromes within the backbone and accessory DNA of the IncQ family of plasmids
Plasmid | Whole plasmid
|
Plasmid backbonea
|
Accessory DNAa
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Size (bp) (no. of palindromes) | No. of bp per palindrome occurrence | Size (bp) (no. of palindromes) | No. of bp per palindrome occurrence | Size (bp) (no. of palindromes) | No. of bp per palindrome occurrence | |
RSF1010 | 8,684 (84) | 103 | 5,365 (38) | 204 | 3,319 (46) | 72 |
pTF-FC2 | 12,180 (88) | 138 | 8,674 (27) | 321 | 3,506 (61) | 57 |
pIE1107 | 8,520 (75) | 113 | 5,310 (36) | 153 | 3,210 (39) | 82 |
pIE1115 | 10,687 (99) | 108 | 5,100 (37) | 138 | 5,587 (62) | 90 |
pIE1130 | 10,687 (107) | 99 | 5,500 (36) | 147 | 4,187 (71) | 59 |
pDN1 | 5,112 (36) | 142 | 5,112 (36) | 142 | NAb | NA |
The exact position of the transition between backbone and accessory DNA is not known for some plasmids.
NA, not applicable.
SUMMARY AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
The two major groups of IncQ-like plasmids described in this review were isolated from bacteria growing in two very different environments. It is unlikely that IncQ-like plasmids would be found in bacteria as diverse as the neutrophilic, heterotrophic bacteria associated with medical samples or animal wastes and the acidophilic, obligately autotrophic bacteria associated with inorganic mining environments, if they are not also present in other ecological niches. It may therefore be assumed that other plasmids of the IncQ family will be found in a variety of other environments once these environments are examined for their presence. The Southern hybridization and PCR-based techniques used to screen for IncQ-like plasmids were based on hybridization probes and PCR primers from IncQ-like group 1 plasmids and would almost certainly not have detected IncQ-like group 2 plasmids such as pTF-FC2 or pTC-F14. Likewise, the very successful mating experiments used to capture the IncQ-like plasmids pIE1107, pIE1115, and pIE1130 in E. coli were dependent on the plasmids having selectable antibiotic resistance markers and would not have isolated plasmids like pDN1. A comparison of the DNA sequences of all IncQ-like plasmids discovered so far is needed to attempt to identify regions which are sufficiently conserved to be used as hybridization probes or for the design of PCR primers which would detect members of the IncQ plasmids belonging to both known major groups. The most highly conserved regions occur within the repC genes, but PCR primers that would detect all the currently known types of IncQ-like plasmids still need to be designed and tested before they can be used to screen for these plasmids in new environments. Alternatively, degenerate primers, possibly used together with an appropriate PCR protocol, are required.
All of the IncQ-like plasmids discovered so far have a backbone consisting of a mobilization region and a plasmid replication maintenance region. Their wide distribution indicates that the replication and mobilization combination characteristic of the IncQ plasmid family must be particularly competitive from an ecological point of view. It is still not certain what the exact reasons are for the especially broad-host-range nature of these plasmids. As suggested above, it may be that the replicon is independent of many of the proteins required by the host replication apparatus. However, this independence from the host background would also have to extend to transcription from the promoters of essential plasmid replication and mobilization functions. Differences in the stability of IncQ and IncQ-like plasmids in the absence of selection in different hosts have been observed (86). There is much scope for future studies of the expression and control of mobilization and replicon genes as well as of plasmid copy number control in a wide range of hosts. Studies of this sort should provide additional insights into the reasons for the broad-host-range, promiscuous character of the IncQ-like plasmids. In addition, Kim and Meyer (41) reported that a 75-bp antisense RNA molecule transcribed from DNA immediately upstream of the repA gene of IncQ plasmid R1162 regulated the plasmid copy number. Investigations into the possibility that antisense RNA may play a role in the regulation of other members of the IncQ-family have been neglected.
The lack of rep gene complementation between members of the IncQ plasmid family raises questions about what determines Rep protein-oriV-binding specificity. These cross-complementation experiments have been reported only for the R300B/pTF-FC2 and pTC-F14/pTF-FC2 plasmid couples. Other studies of this type which include members of the IncQ-like plasmid family are required. Since the RepC protein binds specifically to the iterons, one may speculate that the RepC-oriV-binding specificity may affect the ability of plasmids to cross-complement each other. If this is indeed the reason, it should be possible to carry out experiments to test whether would one obtain interplasmid repA and repB complementation, as long as the specific repC and oriV combination is provided. Alternately, it may be that Rep proteins from various members of the IncQ family can be mixed only if the corresponding elements of the oriV region with which they naturally react are exchanged as well. Since this type of speculation is fairly easily testable, more experiments of this type are required.
The observation that the backbones of all plasmids of the IncQ family discovered so far have a G+C content of 60 to 64% is interesting. Many of the IncQ and IncQ-like plasmids were isolated from bacteria with G+C contents that are consistent with this fairly high G+C content (P. aeruginosa, 67%; A. ferrooxidans, 59%; A. caldus, 61 to 63%). However, some of the IncQ-related plasmids were originally isolated from genera with considerably lower G+C contents, such as Dichelobacter (45%) or Salmonella and Escherichia (48 to 52%). In spite of this, the G+C content of the plasmid backbone is uniformly high. Whether this high G+C content has biological significance or is simply a consequence of the evolutionary history of the IncQ-like plasmid family is an unanswered question. Possibly the ancestral IncQ-like plasmid evolved in bacteria with a high G+C content and there has been insufficient selection pressure to reverse this. Since the accessory DNA of the IncQ-1 plasmids has a substantially lower G+C content than and codon usage pattern different from the rest of the backbone, these regions must have been acquired from other sources. This suggests that the plasmid must reside for unknown periods in hosts with G+C contents lower than 60 to 64%. It may be that these plasmids are now so promiscuous that the length of time they spend in a host with a low G+C content before again residing in a host with a high G+C content is too short to allow the evolution of a plasmid G+C content that matches that of the host. It will be interesting to monitor this feature in IncQ-like plasmids that may be discovered in the future, especially those isolated from bacteria with G+C contents substantially different from 60 to 64%.
The lack of restriction endonuclease cleavage sites within the plasmid backbone is presumably an adaptation to the ability of the IncQ-like plasmids to spread horizontally through a variety of hosts within a mixed microbial community. However, this lack of restriction endonuclease cleavage sites does not apply to the accessory DNA, and the acquisition of DNA with an abundance of such sites may represent an “Achilles heel” that restricts rapid horizontal plasmid spread. Plasmids like pDN1 which consist only of a plasmid backbone with few restriction endonuclease cleavage sites, may have an advantage in horizontal transfer. It is possible that plasmid pDN1, which does not appear to have accessory DNA and has a very different G+C content from the host in which it was discovered, is a “lightweight” backbone plasmid cruising between hosts. However, the presence of a plasmid with its intrinsic metabolic burden would decrease host cell fitness. Under these conditions, there would be selection pressure for backbone plasmids to acquire accessory DNA that increases host fitness and helps to ensure that plasmid-containing cells are not eliminated from the population. Since the acquisition of accessory genes with their accompanying restriction enzyme cleavage sites would in turn restrict horizontal plasmid transfer, there is likely to be a tension between ease of plasmid transfer and benefit to the host. Natural backbone plasmids like pDN1 and plasmids with accessory genes like RSF1010, pTF-FC2, and others possibly represent nature's compromise solution to this problem.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Work in the laboratory of D.E.R. is supported by Billiton Process Research Laboratories (Randburg, South Africa), the University of Stellenbosch, and the National Research Foundation (Pretoria, South Africa).
REFERENCES
- 1.Albritton W L, Brunton J L, Slaney L, MacLean I. Plasmid-mediated sulfonamide resistance in Haemophilus ducreyi. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982;21:159–165. doi: 10.1128/aac.21.1.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Anthony L S, Gu M Z, Cowley S C, Leung W W, Nano F E. Transformation and allelic replacement in Francisella spp. J Gen Microbiol. 1991;137:2697–2703. doi: 10.1099/00221287-137-12-2697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Arber W, Linn S. DNA modification and restriction. Annu Rev Biochem. 1969;38:467–500. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.38.070169.002343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Argyle J L, Rapp-Giles B J, Wall J D. Plasmid transfer by conjugation in Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992;73:255–262. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(92)90640-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bagdasarian M, Lurz R, Rückert B, Franklin F C H, Bagdasarian M M, Frey J, Timmis K N. Specific purpose plasmid cloning vectors. II. Broad host range, high copy number, RSF1010-derived vectors, and a host-vector system for gene cloning in Pseudomonas. Gene. 1981;16:237–247. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(81)90080-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Barth P T, Grinter N J. Comparison of the deoxyribonucleic acid molecular weights and homologies of plasmids conferring linked resistance to streptomycin and sulfonamides. J Bacteriol. 1974;120:618–630. doi: 10.1128/jb.120.2.618-630.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Becker E C, Meyer R J. Acquisition of resistance genes by the IncQ plasmid R1162 is limited by its high copy number and lack of a partitioning mechanism. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:5947–5950. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.18.5947-5950.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Beijersbergen A, Dendulkras A, Schilperoort R A, Hooykaas P J J. Conjugative transfer by the virulence system of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Science. 1992;256:1324–1327. doi: 10.1126/science.256.5061.1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bingle W H, Smit J. High-level expression vectors for Caulobacter crescentus incorporating the transcription/translation initiation regions of the paracrystalline surface-layer-protein gene. Plasmid. 1990;24:143–148. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(90)90016-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Boyer H W. DNA restriction and modification mechanisms in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1971;25:153–176. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.25.100171.001101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brunton J, Clare D, Meier M A. Molecular epidemiology of antibiotic resistance plasmids of Haemophilus species and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Rev Infect Dis. 1986;8:713–724. doi: 10.1093/clinids/8.5.713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bryan L E, van den Elzen H M, Tseng J T. Transferable drug resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972;1:22–29. doi: 10.1128/aac.1.1.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Buchanan-Wollaston V, Passiatore J E, Cannon F. The mob and oriT mobilization functions of a bacterial plasmid promote its transfer to plants. Nature. 1987;328:172–175. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Butcher B G, Deane S M, Rawlings D E. The chromosomal arsenic resistance genes of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans have an unusual arrangement and confer increased arsenic and antimony resistance to Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:1826–1833. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.5.1826-1833.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chilley P M, Wilkins B M. Distribution of the ardA family of antirestriction genes on conjugative plasmids. Microbiology. 1995;141:2157–2164. doi: 10.1099/13500872-141-9-2157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cotter T W, Thomashow M F. A conjugation procedure for Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus and its use to identify DNA sequences that enhance the plaque-forming ability of a spontaneous host-independent mutant. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:6011–6017. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.19.6011-6017.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Clennel A-M, Johnston B, Rawlings D E. Structure and function of Tn5467, a Tn21-like transposon located on Thiobacillus ferrooxidans plasmid pTF-FC2. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:223–4229. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.12.4223-4229.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dehio C, Meyer M. Maintenance of broad-host-range incompatibility group P and group Q plasmids and transposition of Tn5 in Bartonella henselae following conjugal plasmid transfer from Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:538–540. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.2.538-540.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.del Solar G, Giraldo R, Ruiz-Echevarría M J, Espinosa M, Díaz-Orejas R. Replication and control of circular bacterial plasmids. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62:434–464. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.62.2.434-464.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dorrington R A, Rawlings D E. Identification and sequence of the basic replication region of a broad-host-range plasmid isolated from Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. J Bacteriol. 1989;171:2735–2739. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.5.2735-2739.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dorrington R A, Rawlings D E. Characterization of the minmum replicon of the broad-host-range plasmid pTF-FC2 and similarity between pTF-FC2 and the IncQ plasmids. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:5697–5705. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.10.5697-5705.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dorrington R A, Bardien S, Rawlings D E. The broad-host-range plasmid pTF-FC2 requires a primase-like protein for autonomous replication in Escherichia coli. Gene. 1991;108:7–14. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90481-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Drolet M, Zanga P, Lau P C K. The mobilization and origin of transfer regions of a Thiobacillus ferroxidans plasmid: relatedness to plasmids RSF1010 and pSC101. Mol Microbiol. 1990;4:1381–1391. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1990.tb00717.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fling M E, Kopf J, Richards C. Characterization of plasmid pAZ1 and the type III dihydrofolate reductase gene. Plasmid. 1988;19:30–38. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(88)90060-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Frey J, Bagdasarian M. The biology of IncQ plasmids. In: Thomas C M, editor. Promiscuous plasmids of Gram-negative bacteria. London, United Kingdom: Academic Press, Ltd.; 1989. pp. 79–93. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Frey J, Bagdasarian M M, Bagdasarian M. Replication and copy number control of the broad-host-range plasmid RSF1010. Gene. 1992;113:101–106. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90675-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gardner M N, Deane S M, Rawlings D E. Isolation of a new broad host-range plasmid, pTC-F14, from the acidophilic bacterium Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and analysis of the plasmid replicon. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:3303–3309. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.11.3303-3309.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Goncharoff P, Yip J K, Wang H, Schreiner H C, Pai J A, Furgang D, Stevens R H, Figurski D H, Fine D H. Conjugal transfer of broad-host-range incompatibility group P and Q plasmids from Escherichia coli to Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Infect Immun. 1993;61:2544–3547. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.8.3544-3547.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gormley E, Davies J. Transfer of plasmid RSF1010 by conjugation from Escherichia coli to Steptomyces lividans and Mycobacterium smegmatis. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:6705–6708. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.21.6705-6708.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Götz A, Pukall R, Smit E, Tietze E, Prager R, Tschäpe H, van Elsas J D, Smalla K. Detection and characterization of broad-host-range plasmids in environmental bacteria by PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:2621–2628. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.7.2621-2628.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Grinter N J, Barth P T. Characterization of SmSu plasmids by restriction endonuclease cleavage and compatibility testing. J Bacteriol. 1976;128:394–400. doi: 10.1128/jb.128.1.394-400.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Guerry P, van Embden J, Falkow S. Molecular nature of two nonconjugative plasmids carrying drug resistance genes. J Bacteriol. 1974;117:619–630. doi: 10.1128/jb.117.2.619-630.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hall M C, Matson S W. Helicase motifs: the engine that powers DNA unwinding. Mol Microbiol. 1999;34:867–877. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01659.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hallberg K B, Lindström E B. Characterization of Thiobacillus caldus sp. nov., a moderately thermophilic acidophile. Microbiology. 1994;140:3451–3456. doi: 10.1099/13500872-140-12-3451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Haring V, Scherzinger E. Replication proteins of the IncQ plasmid RSF1010. In: Thomas C M, editor. Promiscuous plasmids of Gram-negative bacteria. London, United Kingdom: Academic Press, Ltd.; 1989. pp. 95–124. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Henderson D, Meyer R J. The MobA-linked primase is the only replication protein of R1162 required for conjugal mobilization. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:2973–2978. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.9.2973-2978.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Herrera G, Snyman S J, Thomson J A. Construction of a bioinsecticidal strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens active against the sugarcane borer, Eldana saccharina. Appl Eviron Microbiol. 1994;60:682–890. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.2.682-690.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Honda Y, Sakai H, Komano T, Bagdasarian M. RepB′ is required in trans for the two single-strand DNA initiation signals in oriV of plasmid RSF1010. Gene. 1989;80:155–159. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90261-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Honda Y, Sakai H, Hiasa H, Tanaka K, Komano T. Functional division and reconstruction of a plasmid replication origin: molecular dissection of the oriV of the broad-host-range plasmid RSF1010. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:179–183. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.1.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kelly D P, Harrison A P. Genus Thiobacillus Beijerinck. In: Stanley J T, Bryant M P, Pfenning N, Holt J G, editors. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. Vol. 3. Baltimore, Md: The Williams & Wilkins Co.; 1983. pp. 1842–1858. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kim Y-J, Meyer R J. Copy-number of broad host-range plasmid R1162 is regulated by a small RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986;14:8027–8046. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.20.8027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kim Y-J, Meyer R J. An essential iteron-binding protein required for plasmid R1162 replication induces localized melting within the origin at a specific site in AT-rich DNA. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:5539–5545. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.17.5539-5545.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kreps S, Ferino F, Mosrin C, Gerits J, Mergeay M, Thuriaux P. Conjugatve tranfer and autonomous replication of a promiscuous IncQ plasmid in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC6803. Mol Gen Genet. 1990;221:129–133. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kusano T, Sugawara K, Inoue C, Takeshima T, Numata M, Shiratori T. Electrotransofrmation of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans with plasmids containing a mer determinant as the selective marker by electroporation. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:6617–6623. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.20.6617-6623.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kwong S M, Yeo C C, Suwanto A, Poh C L. Characterization of the endogenous plasmid from Pseudomonas alcaligenes NCIB 9867: DNA sequence and mechanism of transfer. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:81–90. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.1.81-90.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lanka E, Wilkins B M. DNA processing reactions in bacterial conjugation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1995;64:141–169. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.001041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lau P C K, Drolet M, Zanga P, Holmes D S. Plasmid technology for biomining applications. In: Torma A, Apel M, Brierley C, editors. Biohydrometallurgical technologies. Vol. 2. Warrendale, Pa: TMS Press; 1993. pp. 635–644. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lin L-S, Kim Y-J, Meyer R J. The 20 bp. Directly repeated DNA sequence of broad host range plasmid R1162 exerts incompatibility in vivo and inhibits R1162 DNA replication in vitro. Mol Gen Genet. 1987;208:390–397. doi: 10.1007/BF00328129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lin L-S, Meyer R J. DNA synthesis is initiated at two positions within the origin of replication of plasmid RSF1010. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987;20:8319–8331. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.20.8319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mack K, Titball R W. Transformation of Burkholderia pseudomallei by electroporation. Anal Biochem. 1996;242:73–76. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.0430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Maeser S, Scholtz P, Otto S, Scherzinger E. Gene F of plasmid FSR1010 codes for a low-molecular weight repressor protein that autoregulates expression of the repAC operon. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:6215–6222. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.21.6215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Margesin R, Schinner F. Heavy metal resistant Arthrobacter sp. — a tool for studying conjugal plasmid transfer between gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. J Basic Microbiol. 1997;37:217–227. doi: 10.1002/jobm.3620370312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Meyer R, Hinds M, Brasch M. Properties of R1162, a broad host range, high copy number plasmid. J Bacteriol. 1982;150:552–562. doi: 10.1128/jb.150.2.552-562.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Miao D-M, Honda Y, Tanaka K, Higashi A, Nakamura T, Taguchi Y, Sakai H, Komano T, Bagdasarian M. A base-paired hairpin structure essential for the functional priming signal for DNA replication of the broad-host-range plasmid RSF1010. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993;21:4900–4903. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.21.4900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Miao D-M, Sakai H, Okamoto S, Tanaka K, Okuda M, Honda Y, Komano T, Bagdasarian M. The interaction of RepC initiator with iterons in the replication of the broad host-range plasmid RSF1010. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23:3295–3300. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.16.3295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Nakatsu C H, Wyndham R C. Cloning and expression of the transposable chlorobenzoate-3,4-dioxygenase genes of Alcaligenes sp. strain BR60. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59:3625–3633. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.11.3625-3633.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Nesvera J, Hochmannova J, Patek M, Sroglova A, Becvarova V. Transfer of the broad-host-range plasmid RSF1010 and other plasmid vectors to the gram-positive methylotroph Brevibacterium methylicum by electrotransformation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1994;40:864–866. doi: 10.1007/BF00173989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Novick R P. Plasmid incompatibility. Microbiol Rev. 1987;51:381–395. doi: 10.1128/mr.51.4.381-395.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Osborn M, Bron S, Firth N, Holsappel S, Huddleston A, Kiewiet R, Meijer W, Seegers J, Skurray R, Terpstra P, Thomas C M, Thorsted P, Tietze E, Turner S L. The evolution of bacterial plasmids. In: Thomas C M, editor. The horizontal gene pool, bacterial plasmids and gene spread. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Harwood Academic Publishers; 2000. pp. 301–361. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Pansegrau W, Balzer D, Kruft V, Lurz R, Lanka E. In vitro assembly of relaxosomes at the transfer origin of plasmid RP4. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:6665–6669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.17.6555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pansegrau W, Lanka E, Barth P T, Figurski D H, Guiney D G, Haas D, Helinski D R, Schwab H, Stanisich V A, Thomas C M. Complete nucleotide sequence of Birmingham IncPα plasmids, compilation and comparative analysis. J Mol Biol. 1994;239:623–663. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Paulsen I T, Brown M H, Skurray R. Proton-dependent multidrug efflux systems. Mirobiol Rev. 1996;60:575–608. doi: 10.1128/mr.60.4.575-608.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Peng J B, Yan W M, Bao X Z. Plasmid and transoposon transfer to Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:2892–2897. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.10.2892-2897.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Perwez T, Meyer R J. MobB protein stimulates nicking at the R1162 origin of transfer by increasing the proportion of complexed plasmid DNA. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:5762–5767. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.19.5762-5767.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Persson C, Nordstrom K. Control of replication of the broad host range plasmid RSF1010: the incompatibility determinant consists of directly repeated DNA squences. Mol Gen Genet. 1986;203:189–192. doi: 10.1007/BF00330402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Quentmeier A, Friedrich C G. Transfer and expression of degradative and antibiotic resistance plasmids in acidophilic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994;60:973–978. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.3.973-978.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Rawlings D E, Kusano T. Molecular studies of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Microbiol Rev. 1994;58:39–55. doi: 10.1128/mr.58.1.39-55.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rawlings D E, Pretorius I, Woods D R. Expression of a Thiobacillus ferrooxidans origin of replication in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1984;159:737–738. doi: 10.1128/jb.158.2.737-738.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Rawlings D E, Woods D R. Mobilization of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans plasmids among Escherichia coli strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985;49:1323–1325. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.5.1323-1325.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Recchia G D, Hall R M. Plasmid evolution by acquisition of mobile gene cassettes: plasmid pIE723 contains the aadB gene cassette precisely inserted at a secondary site in the IncQ plasmid RSF1010. Mol Microbiol. 1995;15:179–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02232.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Rohrer J, Rawlings D E. Sequence analysis and characterization of the mobilization region of a broad-host-range plasmid, pTF-FC2, isolated from Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:6230–6237. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.19.6230-6237.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Rohrer J, Rawlings D E. Regulation of mobilization of the broad-host-range plasmid pTF-FC2. Mol Microbiol. 1993;9:1051–1059. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01234.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Rotger R, Nombela C. Characterization of penicillin-resistant β-lactamase-producing strains of Neisseria gonorrhaoeae isolated in Spain (1978–1981) Microbiol Esp. 1983;36:115–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Rotger R, Rubio F, Nombela C. A multi-resistant plasmid from commensal Neisseria species is closely related to the enterobacterial plasmid RSF1010. J Gen Microbiol. 1986;132:2491–2496. doi: 10.1099/00221287-132-9-2491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Saano A K, Zinchenko V V. A new plasmid R89S: properties and genetic organization. Plasmid. 1987;17:191–201. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(87)90027-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Sakai H, Komano T. DNA replication of IncQ broad-host-range plasmids in Gram-negative bacteria. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1996;60:377–382. doi: 10.1271/bbb.60.377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Scherzinger E, Haring V, Lurz R, Otto S. Plasmid RSF1010 DNA replication in vitro promoted by purified RSF1010 RepA, RepB and RepC proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19:1203–1211. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.6.1203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Scherzinger E, Lurz R, Otto S, Dobrinski B. In vitro cleavage of double- and single-stranded DNA by plasmid RSF1010-encoded mobilization proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20:41–48. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Scherzinger E, Kruft V, Otto S. Purification of the large mobilization protein of plasmid RSF1010 and characterization of its site-specific DNA cleaving/DNA joining activity. Eur J Biochem. 1993;217:929–929. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18323.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Scholtz P, Haring V, Wittmann-Liebold B, Ashman K, Bagdasarian M, Scherzinger E. Complete nucleotide sequence and gene organization of the broad-host-range plasmid RSF1010. Gene. 1989;75:271–288. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90273-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Segal G, Purcell M, Schuman H A. Host cell killing and bacterial conjugation require overlapping sets of genes within a 22-kb region of the Legionella pneumophila genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:1669–1674. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Segal G, Russo J J, Schuman H A. Relationships between a new type IV secretion system and the icm/dot system of Legionella pneumophila. Mol Microbiol. 1999;34:799–809. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01642.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Segal G, Schuman H A. Intracellular multiplication and human macrophage killing by are Legionella pneumophila inhibited by conjugal components of IncQ plasmid RSF1010. Mol Microbiol. 1998;30:197–208. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01054.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Siddavattam D, Nickles A, Herterich S, Steibl H D, Kreutzer R, Klingmuller W. Site-specific mutagenesis in Enterobacter agglomerans: construction of nifB mutants and analysis of the gene's structure and function. Mol Gen Genet. 1995;249:526–532. doi: 10.1007/BF00290578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Simon R, Priefer U, Pühler A. Vector plasmids for in vivo and in vitro manipulations of Gram-negative bacteria. In: Pühler A, editor. Molecular genetics of the bacterial-plant interaction. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag KG; 1983. pp. 98–105. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Smalla K, Heuer H, Götz A, Niemeyer D, Krögerrechlenfort E, Tietze E. Exogenous isolation of antibiotic resistance plasmids from piggery manure slurries reveals a high prevalence and diversity of IncQ-like plasmids. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:4854–4862. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.11.4854-4862.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Smith A G S, Rawlings D E. The poison-antidote stability system of the broad-host-range Thiobacillus ferroxidans plasmid pTF-FC2. Mol Microbiol. 1997;26:961–970. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.6332000.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Sobecky P A, Mincer T J, Chang M C, Helinski D R. Plasmids isolated from marine sediment microbial communities contain replication and incompatibility regions unrelated to those of known plasmid groups. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:888–895. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.3.888-895.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Sobecky P A, Mincer T J, Chang M C, Toukdarian A, Helinski D R. Isolation of broad-host-range replicons from marine sediment bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:2822–2830. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.8.2822-2830.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Sode K, Tatara M, Takeyama H, Burgess J G, Matsunaga T. Conjugative gene transfer in marine cyanobcteria: Synechococcus sp., Synechocystis sp. and Pseudoanabaena sp. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1992;37:369–373. doi: 10.1007/BF00210994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Sýkora P. Macroevolution of plasmids: a model for plasmid speciation. J Theor Biol. 1992;159:53–65. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80767-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Thorsted P B, Macartney D P, Aktar P, Haines A S, Ali N, Davidson P, Stafford T, Pocklington M J, Pansegrau W, Wlikins B M, Lanka E, Thomas C M. Complete sequence of the IncPβ plasmid R751: implications for evolution and organisation of the IncP backbone. J Mol Biol. 1998;282:969–990. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Tietze E. Nucleotide sequence and genetic characterization of the novel IncQ-like plasmid pIE1107. Plasmid. 1998;39:165–181. doi: 10.1006/plas.1998.1343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Tietze E, Tschäpe H, Voigt W. Characterization of new resistance plasmids belonging to incompatibility group IncQ. J Basic Microbiol. 1989;10:695–706. doi: 10.1002/jobm.3620291013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Wahlund T M, Madigan M T. Genetic transfer by conjugation in the thermophilic green sulfur bacterium Chlorobium tepidum. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:2583–2588. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.9.2583-2588.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Whittle G, Katz M E, Clayton E H, Cheetham B F. Identification and characterization of a native Dichelobacter nodosus plasmid, pDN1. Plasmid. 2000;43:230–234. doi: 10.1006/plas.1999.1456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Wilkins B M, Chilley P M, Thomas A T, Pocklington M J. Distribution of restriction enzyme recognition sequences on broad host range plasmid RP4: molecular and evolutionary implications. J Mol Biol. 1996;258:447–456. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Willson P J, Deneer H G, Potter A, Albritton W. Characterization of a streptomycin-sulfonamide resistance plasmid from Actinobacillus pleauropneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989;33:235–238. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.2.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Yoshida K, Takegami T, Katoh A, Nishikawa M, Nishida T. Construction of a novel conjugative plasmid harboring a GFP reporter gene and its introduction into animal cells by transfection and trans-kingdom conjugation. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1997;37:157–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Zechner E L, de la Cruz F, Eisenbrandt R, Grahn A M, Koraimann G, Lanka E, Muth G, Pansegrau W, Thomas C M, Wilkins B M, Zatyka M. Conjugative-DNA transfer processes. In: Thomas C M, editor. The horizontal gene pool, bacterial plasmids and gene spread. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Harwood Academic Publishers; 2000. pp. 87–174. [Google Scholar]
- 101.Zhang S, Meyer R J. The relaxosome protein MobC promotes conjugal plasmid mobilization by extending DNA strand separation to the nick site at the origin of transfer. Mol Microbiol. 1997;25:509–516. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4861849.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Ziegelin G, Pansegrau W, Lurz R, Lanka E. TraK protein of conjugative plasmid RP4 forms a specialised nucleoprotein complex with the transfer origin. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:17279–17286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]