Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Feb 7;18(2):e0281369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281369

Women’s multidimensional empowerment index and essential newborn care practice in Bangladesh: The mediating role of skilled antenatal care follow-ups

Kanchan Kumar Sen 1,*, Ahsan Rahman Jamee 1, Wasimul Bari 1
Editor: Gouranga Lal Dasvarma2
PMCID: PMC9904503  PMID: 36749769

Abstract

Introduction

The World Health Organization recommended a set of five neonatal care practices that are most essential for good health of a newborn. As good essential newborn care (ENC) practice reduces the risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality, this paper focuses how women’s multidimensional empowerment index is associated with this practice through the skilled antenatal care. To the best of knowledge, no such study has been conducted yet. The composite index of women’s multidimensional empowerments was constructed using family decision, intimate partner violence, social status, healthcare access and economic status of women; and skilled antenatal care was defined if a pregnant woman received eight or more checkups during pregnancy from skilled health professionals.

Materials and methods

Data extracted from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey, 2017–18 have been utilized in the study. A total of 2441 mothers have been considered who delivered their last live birth at home within three years preceding the survey. A mediation analysis was performed considering the structural equation modeling to find out the adjusted association of women’s empowerment on both skilled antenatal care and good ENC practice, but the unadjusted associations were also checked using a chi-square test. To test the indirect as well as total effect of women’s empowerment through skilled antenatal care on good ENC practice, bias-corrected standard errors were estimated using a bootstrapping sampling.

Results

Good ENC practice was considerably low in Bangladesh with 7.6% of newborns receiving the practice. Both adjusted and unadjusted analyses showed the significant association of women’s empowerment with both skilled antenatal care and good ENC practice. The study revealed that the indirect effect of high empowerment through skilled antenatal care was greater than its direct effect on good ENC practice.

Conclusion

This study explored that the prevalence of good ENC practice can be accelerated through women’s empowerment, where skilled antenatal care plays an important mediating role in improving good ENC practice among highly empowered mothers. The study suggests that a woman should follow the latest guidelines recommended by WHO for antenatal care follow-up. Policymakers can modify some of the maternal and child health care interventions based on the research findings.

Introduction

Neonatal mortality shares 47% of the global under-5 deaths, where one-third of these deaths were observed on the day of birth [1]. Moreover, the first week of life is the most vulnerable period [2] as nearly 75% of neonatal deaths occurred during that time [1,3]. A substantial improvement has been made worldwide regarding child survival since 1990. The global rate of neonatal deaths was decreased by 52% from 1990 to 2019; however, this decline has been slower compared to the under-five child mortality rate [1]. In Bangladesh, neonatal deaths contributed around 67% of all under-five mortality [4]. To achieve the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.2, which aims to reduce the neonatal mortality rate to 12 per thousand live births by 2030, Bangladesh lags far behind this target as the current neonatal mortality rate is 30 per 1000 live births [4,5]. The majority of neonatal deaths occur due to premature birth, intrapartum conditions of labor, infections, or imperfect manner of newborn care practices [69]. Essential newborn care (ENC) practice and supervision of skilled health personnel during labor and childbirth may prevent about 70% of neonatal deaths [10,11]. Therefore, to improve the health status of newborns and to reduce the neonatal mortality to a great extent, appropriate strategies need to be developed for the essential newborn care practice.

Regardless of place of delivery or size of the infant, every newborn baby needs essential newborn care (ENC). World Health Organization (WHO) recommends five practices for ENC focused on using clean instruments to cut the umbilical cord, applying nothing to the cord, immediate drying (within 5 minutes), delayed bathing (72 hours after birth), and immediate initiation of breastfeeding (within 1 hour of delivery) [4,12]. A large number of neonatal deaths occur due to bacterial infections to the umbilical cord. However, these infections can be prevented and thus reduce the risk of neonatal mortality by practicing proper care to the umbilical cord [13,14]. Hypothermia increases neonates’ intracranial hemorrhage and sepsis which further affects infant mortality [15]. To reduce the risk of hypothermia, newborns should be dried and put on the mother’s bare chest within minutes after birth, and they should be bathed late [1618]. Initiating immediate breastfeeding also alleviates the risk of diarrhea, pneumonia, neonatal sepsis, and meningitis [19].

Among non-institutional births, the risk of neonatal mortality is higher compared to the facility births; and the prevalence of practicing essential newborn care is very low [6,20]. Also, in developing countries like Bangladesh, mothers of home-born children had inadequate knowledge regarding the practice of essential newborn care. The majority of live births were non-institutional and delivered in the absence of skilled personnel; and such mothers had insufficient access to proper antenatal care [21]. The WHO recommended at least eight antenatal checkups by the skilled attendant to reduce perinatal mortality and improve the experience of newborn care for pregnant women [22,23]. Skilled antenatal care (SANC) providers also guide mothers to acquire knowledge about essential newborn care practices and maintaining healthy conditions during pregnancy [24]. Moreover, women having non-institutional birth are likely to seek services from traditional birth attendants rather than skilled providers, which may result in high maternal and neonatal deaths [25].

Women’s empowerment can inspire pregnant women to utilize skilled ANC services [2527]. Empowered women have also more access to the modern health facilities, which in turn helps to reduce neonatal mortality [2831]. Recent studies revealed that a low rate of women’s empowerment and limited access to receive skilled ANC increase the risk of neonatal mortality [3234]. However, most of the studies employed only one or two dimensions to describe women’s empowerment, concentrating on family decision-making autonomy and attitudes toward intimate partner violence [35] that limit women’s empowerment. Another study proposed a survey-based women’s empowerment index (SWPER) for African countries, which included three dimensions: social independence, decision making, and attitude toward violence [36]. A recent study assessed women’s empowerment across five domains: health care access, socioeconomic status, decision making autonomy, attitude toward violence, and asset ownership [35]. As a result, the current study, like the previous two, used a multidimensional women’s empowerment index to emphasize empowerment from multiple perspectives in Bangladesh [35,36].An attempt has been made in this study to examine how empowerment of women plays a role in improving the ENC practices directly as well as indirectly through the utilization of skilled antenatal care. To best of our knowledge, this was the first study that developed a composite index for women’s empowerment by assessing the five dimensions such as women’s autonomy in family decisions, attitudes toward wife-beating by husband, barriers faced by women in accessing health care, women’s social independence and women’s assets using a weighting approach followed by Alkire and Foster [37]. Latest guideline of the WHO on receiving antenatal care checkups from skilled health personnel has been followed to define SANC. Mediation technique for examining the mediating role of skilled antenatal care to strengthen the relationship between women’s empowerment and ENC practice has also been adopted [38]. For the purpose of the analysis, data have been extracted from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2017–18.

Conceptual framework

The women’s empowerment is an important indicator for achieving some sustainable development goals because it contributes in improving family health outcomes, including child health [35,39]. Empowered women are more likely to have better access to healthcare and have control over health resources that improve their health as well as the health of their families and children [35,4045]. Previous studies also examined that women’s empowerment play a vital role in utilizing the maternal healthcare services such as antenatal care, delivery care and postnatal care [4648]. Again, antenatal care visits are significantly associated with essential newborn care practices [4952]. In this study, it has been hypothesized that women’s multidimensional empowerment index (MEI) positively influences the ENC practice, as well as skilled ANC follow-ups; and skilled ANC also play an important role in enhancing the ENC practice. The conceptual path diagram is shown in Fig 1.

Fig 1. Conceptual path diagram.

Fig 1

Materials and methods

Data source

The study used a recent and nationally representative cross-sectional data obtained from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS), 2017–18 to address the objectives of this study. The National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT) collected data from October 2017 to March 2018 in collaboration with the DHS program and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)/Bangladesh. The survey provided information on various health and demographic indicators such as maternal and child health, fertility, family planning and nutrition etc.

Study design

The sampling frame of the 2011 Population and Housing Census of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh provided by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) was used to collect the data in BDHS, 2017–18. The survey was conducted following two-stage stratified sampling, where a total of 675 enumeration areas (EA), known as clusters, were selected in the first stage with probability proportional to size (PPS) and an average of 30 households were randomly chosen from each selected EA in the second stage using a systematic random sampling. Due to the massive flood in three EAs, a total of 672 clusters were successfully surveyed which included a total of 20,127 ever-married reproductive women. Details of the sample design can be found in the BDHS, 2017–18 final report [4]. Furthermore, as the BDHS, 2017–18 data were collected using a complex sample structure, adjustments for the complex sampling structure were taken care of using the survey Stata command (svy).

Participants

The primary objective of this study was to explore the ENC practices among the home births as the BDHS, 2017–18 only recorded the essential newborn care practices for home births. In the original data set, the information on ENC indicators for institutional births were not available. However, the study selected the reproductive married women who gave the last birth at home within three years preceding the survey. Finally, a total of 2479 women were selected after excluding missing values in this study.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The 2017–18 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey was implemented under the authority of National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT). The data collection procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the ICF International, Rockville, MD, USA and Bangladesh Medical Research Council, Dhaka, Bangladesh. All respondents signed consent forms to participate in the study BDHS, 2017–18. Respondents who did not provide consent were not included in the analysis for the present study. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Outcome measure

Essential newborn care (ENC) practice includes a set of initial cares for babies after birth: cord care (use of clean delivery kit/bag or boiled blade to cut the umbilical cord), nothing applied to the cord or only chlorhexidine applied, immediate drying the baby within 5 minutes, delaying bathing until 72 hours of birth and immediate breastfeeding within 1 hour of birth [4]. According to WHO and National Neonatal Health Strategy and Guidelines for Bangladesh, these practices are recommended to save a newborn [4,16,53]. The outcome variable, ENC practice, was considered as binary random variable, where 1 indicates good ENC and 0 for the poor ENC. A newborn is said to be received good ENC if all five components were practiced; whereas the practice is poor if he/she missed any of the components.

Main exposure: Multidimensional Empowerment Index (MEI)

The MEI is a composite index consisting of several dimensions related to women’s empowerment, with each dimension having multiple indicators of empowerment. In the study, we considered five dimensions to measure the index: women’s autonomy in family decisions, attitudes toward wife-beating by husband, barriers faced by women in accessing health care, women’s social independence and women’s assets. A significant measure of women’s empowerment is asset ownership. The information on "owns land alone or jointly with husband" and "title deed on land owned by women" that was utilized as asset ownership in another study to determine empowerment was absent in the BDHS, 2017–18 data [35]. Due to the lack of availability of this information in BDHS, 2017–18, household assets were regarded as women’s assets in the study. At present, women contribute to their households in improving their assets in Bangladesh. Only women are allowed to join a variety of NGOs, including Grameen Bank, ASA, Brac, Proshika, and others, and they are also only permitted to apply for loans to fund their families or to run small businesses. The BDHS 2017–18 study states that nearly half of women who have ever been married are actively employed, and their contributions to the growth of household assets are also significant. To build their families, each woman in a household has physical as well mental contributions. However, previous studies used a principal component analysis (PCA) [36,46] or a factor analysis [35,54] to measure the women’s empowerment index, where the studies developed several factors (or PCs) for MEI, but we have used a weighting approach giving equal weights to each dimension for getting a composite index of women’s empowerments following a technique of multidimensional poverty measures developed by Alkire and Foster and other research in the current study [37,55]. This composite index assigns a score to each woman, with higher scores signifying greater empowerment. The score ranges from 0 to 1, with 0 signifying little empowerment and 1 representing complete empowerment. We can easily discern the amount of women’s empowerment based on the composite weighting score. Details about the dimensions, indicators, cut-offs, and weights of women’s MEI have been shown in Table 1. Since we have considered five domains, one-fifth (0.2) of the total weight has been given to each domain and the weights of the dimensions have also been equally divided among the indicators of respective dimension.

Table 1. Dimensions, indicators, cut-offs and weights of women’s multidimensional empowerment index (MEI), BDHS, 2017–18.

Dimension Indicator Empowered if woman (cut-off) Weight (indicator) Weight (Dimension)
Household decision-making autonomy Own healthcare takes decision alone or jointly with her husband. 0.050 0.20
Household purchases takes decision alone or jointly with her husband. 0.050
Family visits takes decision alone or jointly with her husband. 0.050
Husband’s earnings takes decision alone or jointly with her husband. 0.050
Attitude towards intimate partner violence Wife beating justified: goes out without telling the husband does not agree. 0.040 0.20
Wife beating justified: neglects the children does not agree. 0.040
Wife beating justified: argues with husband does not agree. 0.040
Wife beating justified: refuses to have sex with husband does not agree. 0.040
Wife beating justified: burns the food does not agree. 0.040
Health access barriers Permission to go to the doctor for seeking medical advice/treatment gets permission 0.050 0.20
Money for treatment gets 0.050
Distance to health facility does not think as a problem 0.050
Not wanting to go alone to seek medical advice/ treatment does not think as a problem 0.050
Social independence Woman’s Education completes secondary or higher education. 0.025 0.20
Frequency of reading newspaper/magazine in a week reads once or more. 0.025
Frequency of watching television in a week watches once or more. 0.025
Has an account in a bank has. 0.025
Employment has earnings from her works 0.025
Age of woman at first birth is of age 19 or more years 0.025
Age at marriage is of age 18 or more years 0.025
Spousal education difference has equal or higher education than her husband. 0.025
Asset ownership Household assets possesses two or more of the following stuff: water pump, air conditioner, computer, mobile telephone, radio, TV, refrigerator, bike or owns a car/truck. 0.200
0.20
Total 1 1

A weighted arithmetic mean was calculated to get the individual score of empowerments. For computing the score, all the indicator variables were converted to binary variables indicating 1 for a woman who was empowered and 0 otherwise on the indicators of empowerment. Mathematically, the individual score can be viewed as

Zi=(1mj=1m1pjk=1pjyijk);

where Zi is the score of the ith (i = 1,2,…,n) individual (woman), m is the number of dimensions, pj is the number of indicators in the jth dimension, yijk is the value of the kth indicator in the jth dimension for the ith woman, and n is the number of total individuals [56]. Theoretically, the score of a woman lies between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates that the woman is not empowered and 1 indicates fully empowered at each dimension. Therefore, it can be said that as the score increases, so does the empowerment of woman. To examine the effect of MEI on ENC practice at different levels of scores, MEI was divided into three groups: low for scores below 0.50, average for scores between 0.50 and 0.75, and high for scores of 0.75 or higher.

Mediator: Skilled Antenatal Care (SANC)

Pregnant women need antenatal care (ANC) check-ups from skilled health personnel to reduce pregnancy complications. Again, an optimum number of ANC visits provide good health for both mother and newborn. Skilled health personnel are called those health professionals who are either doctors, nurses, midwives, family welfare visitors, or community skilled birth attendants [4]. In 2016, the WHO recommended eight or more ANC visits for a pregnant woman [22,57]. However, the skilled antenatal care (SANC) was defined as the antenatal care received from skilled health professional in the study. By taking the recent WHO recommendation on ANC follow-ups into account, the variable, SANC, was categorized into two groups: 8+ SANC visits and <8 SANC visits, and this variable was used as a mediator to explain the relationship between MEI and ENC practice in the study. Note that the recent WHO guideline on ANC visits (2016) was followed in this study to observe how eight or more ANC visits influence good essential newborn care practice. Despite the fact that many of the births and related ANC visits (or non-visits) included in the study occurred prior to the revised guidelines, this study will provide more evidence to follow the most recent WHO guideline on ANC visits to ensure appropriate ENC practice. Furthermore, the current WHO recommendation on ANC visits was also used in the literature, which included data from the 2018 Demographic and Health Survey [5860].

Control variables

Following the previous studies, women’s current age, birth order, place of residence and region were considered as control variables in the study [8,21,61]. The current age was categorized into three categories: 15–20, 20–30 and 30+ years; birth order: first, second/third and fourth/higher; gender of index child: male and female; place of residence: rural and urban. The region was constructed from the eight administrative divisions of Bangladesh, and we categorized the region into three categories: eastern (Chittagong and Sylhet), central (Barisal, Dhaka and Mymensingh) and western (Khulna, Rajshahi and Rangpur).

Statistical analysis

The data extracted from BDHS, 2017–18 were prepared for the analysis after excluding few missing values, and all analyses were conducted using Stata 17. The descriptive statistics of the selected variables were given as frequency percentages. To examine how the mediator and the selected covariates are associated with the ENC practice, analysis of measure of unadjusted association was conducted with chi-square test.

As one of the major objectives in the study was to explore the indirect effect (i.e., mediating effect) of MEI on ENC practice through the skilled ANC visits, a mediation analysis was performed to examine the hypothesis [38]. Hence, a structural equation modeling technique was used by setting two equations for getting the direct effects. The mediator variable, SANC, was modeled in the first equation considering MEI and other variables as covariates; and the outcome variable, ENC practice, was also modeled in the second equation considering MEI, SANC and all other variables as covariates. As the observations on SANC or good ENC practice are likely to be correlated within each cluster, a multilevel binary logistic regression model was employed to address the cluster effect for both equations. To check the cluster effect on SANC or good ENC practice, an intra-class correlation (ICC) statistic was estimated in the study. The Stata command ‘melogit’ was used to estimate the path coefficients of the predictors for both SANC and ENC practice. The product of two path coefficients obtained one from MEI to SANC (say, a) in first equation and another from SANC to ENC practice (say, b) in the second equation produce the amount of indirect effect of MEI on ENC practice via SANC visits (Fig 1). Again, the path coefficient from MEI to ENC practice (say, c) gives the direct effect of MEI on ENC practice. To draw a valid conclusion on indirect and total effects, the bias-corrected standard errors obtained from a bootstrapping sampling with 10,000 iterations were estimated. The total effect is the sum of the direct and indirect effects (i.e. total effect = ab+c) if the indirect effect (ab) is significant, otherwise the total effect is the direct effect of MEI on ENC practice. For evaluating the indirect effect, a 5% level of significance was considered in the study. Note that the covariates having p-value<0.30 were considered in the structural equation model (SEM). A likelihood ratio test (LRT) statistic was applied for checking the goodness of fit of the models.

Results

Descriptive statistics

The joint, as well as the independent distributions of the different components of essential newborn care practices, was presented in Fig 2. It has been observed from Fig 2A that the prevalence of cord care practice was highest (86.3%), whereas the lowest (47.1%) was observed for nothing applied to the cord. About 47% infants received delayed bathing care, about 63% of the children were dried instantly after the birth, and 69% were breastfed immediately within one hour of the birth. Fig 2B revealed that a very few newborns (0.40%) did receive none of the essential newborn cares and only 7.60% had all of the ENC practices. Of the newborns, 30.7%, 35.1%, 20.1% and 6.1% obtained four, three, two, and one ENC components, respectively. In Bangladesh, almost every newborn receives at least one ENC practice, however most babies do not receive all of the ENC practices. Babies born at home do not have access to the same services as those delivered in a hospital. As most home births take place in rural areas, family members contact an unskilled birth attendant during the delivery, where the birth attendants are usually uneducated and do not follow the WHO recommended guidelines. Again, family members in rural areas are unaware of proper ENC practice, and they usually adhere to religious and cultural beliefs. As a result, the newborn does not receive sufficient care during their first few days of life.

Fig 2. Distributions of ENC practices for home deliveriesin Bangladesh, 2017–18.

Fig 2

Fig 3 illustrates the level of multidimensional and overall empowerment of Bangladeshi women. In the case of household decision-making autonomy, on average, a woman was 68.6% empowered, which implies she had participated more than two-thirds of the household’s decisions. Moreover, a woman felt a positive attitude against intimate partner violence, as, on average, 92.7% of the cases, she does not support any kind of oppression from her partner. Approximately 60% of the scores related to health access barriers were covered by a mother; however, less than half of the empowerment scores regarding social independence (42.3%) and household assets (40.0%) were practiced by her, respectively. Congregating all of the dimensions along with the indicators of the empowerment index, a mother was expected to be 60.7% empowered.

Fig 3. Percentage of average empowerment in the dimensions along with overall empowerment among Bangladeshi women.

Fig 3

Table 2 reported the results obtained from exploratory data analysis on selected covariates. It was noticed that the rate of good ENC practice, in general, was very low among the mothers who gave birth at home. More than half (54.65%) of women were average empowered, 21.63% were highly empowered, and 23.72% belonged to the low empowerment category. The prevalence of receiving at least eight antenatal care visits provided by skilled personnel was very low (5.28%) among the mothers who delivered at home in Bangladesh. Most of the women belonged to the middle age (60.58%) group and resided in rural (80.71%) area. About 53% of the selected children are either second or third child of their parents. Around two-fifths of the mothers were from the central region, one-third from the eastern region, and 29.09% from the western region of Bangladesh.

Table 2. Percentage distribution of covariates and prevalence of good ENC for home births in Bangladesh.

Variables Frequency % aGood ENC Practice bp-value
c Women’s Empowerment Index 0.003
Low 588 23.72 7.0 [4.5–9.5]
Average 1355 54.65 6.9 [5.4–8.4]
High 536 21.63 10.0 [7.3–12.8]
Skilled ANC 0.011
No 2305 94.72 7.2 [6.1–8.4]
Yes 136 5.28 15.0 [9.1–21.0]
Women’s Current Age 0.265
15–20 428 17.27 6.0 [3.7–8.4]
20–30 1502 60.58 8.0 [6.5–9.5]
30+ 549 22.15 7.7 [5.5–10.0]
Birth Order 0.230
First 730 29.44 6.7 [4.8–8.5]
Second/Third 1305 52.63 8.5 [6.9–10.2]
Fourth/Higher 444 17.93 6.4 [3.8–9.1]
Place of Residence 0.123
Rural 2001 80.71 8.1 [6.8–9.4]
Urban 478 29.29 5.7 [3.6–7.7]
Region 0.008
Eastern 796 32.10 7.2 [5.3–9.1]
Central 962 38.81 5.6 [3.9–7.2]
Western 721 29.09 10.8 [8.3–13.2]
Total n = 2479 7.6 [6.5–8.7]

Source: Computed by authors based on the analysis of BDHS, 2017–18 data.

Note. aPrevalence of good ENC practice with 95% confidence interval (CI) by selected covariates.

bp-values were calculated from chi-square test statistic to examine the association of the covariates with good ENC practice. cEmpowerment: Low (score<0.50), moderate (0.50≤score<0.75), and high (score≥0.75).

The prevalence of Good ENC Practice by selected socio-economic and demographic covariates was also presented in Table 2. Women’s empowerment index significantly associated (p-value = 0.003) with the good ENC practice as among highly empowered mothers 10.0% practiced good ENC to their newborns. Moreover, only 6.9% of children of average empowered and 7.0% from low empowered mothers received good ENC. Skilled antenatal care (SANC) visits also had a significant impact (p-value = 0.011) on good ENC practice. The rate of good ENC practice was 15.0% for the mothers who had at least eight ANC visits by skilled personnel, whereas 7.2% of newborns received good ENC, but their mothers did not have at least eight ANC from skilled attendants.

Association between multidimensional empowerment index (MEI) and eight or more skilled ANC visits was illustrated graphically in Fig 4A. This revealed that the rate of receiving SANC increases with the increase in MEI level. For example, for the lower MEI the prevalence of SANC was 2.27%, whereas it was 4.71% and 10.00% for average and higher MEI, respectively. Fig 4B represented the distribution of good ENC by SANC and MEI. It was found that among the mothers with lower MEI, the prevalence of good ENC practice was lower for 8+ SANC visits compared to less than 8 SANC visits. However, for the mothers with average or higher MEI the prevalence of good ENC was larger for who visited SANC compared to who did not. In general, the practice of good ENC was found to be highest among mothers who belonged to higher MEI and receiving eight or more skilled ANC.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

(A) Prevalence of skilled ANC visits by women’s multidimensional empowerment index (MEI), and (B) the prevalence of getting good ENC practice by skilled ANC visits over MEI for the home births.

Mediation results

Results obtained from mediation analysis considering structural equations after controlling women’s current age, birth order, place of residence and region are given in Table 3. The results explained the direct effect, mediated effect via SANC, and total effect on good ENC practice. In this analysis, two multilevel binary logistic regression models were fitted: one for skilled ANC and another for good ENC practice to address the cluster effects on the outcome variables. The ICC estimates presented in Table 3 showed that skilled ANC and good ENC practices significantly varied across the clusters. The likelihood ratio test statistics reported in Table 3 also indicated that both multilevel models fitted the data well.

Table 3. Mediation results obtained from structural equation modeling using BDHS, 2017–18 data.

Mediation Variables @Skilled ANC @Good ENC Practice
β (SE) OR [95% CI] β (SE) OR [95% CI]
Direct Effect (DE) Women’s Empowerment Index
Low Ref. 1.00 Ref. 1.00
Average 0.73 (0.31) 2.08 [1.14–3.82]* -0.01 (0.20) 0.99 [0.66–1.47]
High 1.52 (0.33) 4.57 [2.38–8.78]*** 0.53 (0.23) 1.71 [1.08–2.68]*
Skilled ANC
No Ref. 1.00
Yes 0.72 (0.27) 2.06 [1.20–3.52]**
Mediated Effect (ME) via Skilled ANC Women’s Empowerment Index
Low Ref. 1.00
Average 0.53 (0.30) 1.54 [0.95–3.02]
High 1.09 (0.47) 2.41 [1.18–7.57]*
Total Effect (TE) Women’s Empowerment Index
Low Ref. 1.00
Average 0.53 (0.30) 1.54 [0.95–3.02]
High 1.62 (0.53) 5.05 [1.79–14.28]**
Proportion of Mediated Effect (PME) [PME=METE×100] Women’s Empowerment Index
Low Ref.
Average -
High 67.28%
LR Test Statistic 59.91 *** 31.85 **
Intra-class correlation (ICC) 0.26 [0.14–0.43] *** 0.13 [0.05–0.27] **

Source: Computed by authors based on the analysis of BDHS, 2017–18 data.

Note. @Adjusted by current age, birth order, place of residence and region.

*p<0.05.

**p<0.01

***p<0.001. β regression coefficients, SE standard error, OR odds ratio, Ref. reference category.

LR likelihood ratio.

It was found that women’s MEI was significantly associated with skilled ANC, and skilled ANC was also associated with good ENC practice. The likelihood of receiving eight or more antenatal care increases with the level of empowerment. Mothers with average and high empowerment had 108% (OR 2.08, 95% CI: 1.14–3.82) and 357% (OR 4.57, 95% CI: 2.38–8.78) higher odds of receiving SANC, respectively, compared to low empowered mothers. Moreover, the odds of good ENC practice was 106% more among mothers receiving at least eight ANC from skilled health personnel compared to their counterpart (OR 2.06, 95% CI: 1.20–3.52).

Significantly direct influence of women’s empowerment was observed for good ENC practice, and mothers having high empowerment had 71% more odds of practicing good ENC compared to low empowered mothers (OR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.08–2.68). No direct and indirect association was observed between receiving good ENC practice and average empowerment as well as low empowerment. The mediating effect of highly empowered mothers through skilled ANC was significant at 5% level of significance, and among these mothers the indirect odds of receiving good ENC was 2.41 times as likely as that odds for low empowered mothers. Hence, among the highly empowered mothers, the total odds of practicing good ENC was 405% (OR 5.05, 95% CI: 1.79–14.28) higher compared to the mothers having low empowerment.

It was also found that for the women belonging to high MEI level, the indirect effect on good ENC practice was more than direct effect (67.28% versus 32.72%).

Discussion

The study explored the scenario of good ENC practice among the mothers to their newborns born at home in Bangladesh. Only 7.6% of mothers followed good ENC practice and independently, 86.3% used clean and boiled instruments to cut the umbilical cord, 47.1% did not apply anything to the cord, 62.8% dried the newborn in 5 minutes, 47.2% bathed the baby 72 hours or later after birth and 69.0% initiated early breastfeeding within 1 hour of birth. Although the prevalence of most of the ENC components are in line or close with other studies conducted in Ethiopia [6267], the prevalence of overall ENC practice is very low in Bangladesh, and it is far away from the target of 4th HPNSP (Health, Population and Nutrition Sector Program) to achieve the prevalence of 25% by 2022 [4,12,24]. No significant improvement was observed in good ENC practice in Bangladesh over the previous years. For example, in 2011, the prevalence was around 2% and it was increased to 6% in 2014 [68,69]. But this prevalence was much higher in Ethiopia (38%) [8,52], Sudan (58.9%) [70], Eastern Tigray (92.9%) [64] and Uganda (11.7%) [50]. The ENC practice was also much higher in South Asian countries such as Nepal (70.7%) [51] and India (66.7%) [71] compared to Bangladesh. This may happen because of the better health system and awareness programs on ENC practice for the good health of newborns organized by various healthcare organizations in the study area [8]. Therefore, Bangladesh needs to revise policy-making interventions for accelerating the rate of good ENC practice.

The results obtained from the present study can contribute to policymaking to revise some interventions. In the study, a mediation technique was applied to observe the direct, indirect and total effects of women’s empowerment on good ENC practice through the SANC. Both path coefficients of MEI to SANC and SANC to ENC practice were found to be significant in this study which was used to compute the indirect effect. Note that the hypothesis regarding indirect effect as well as the total effect was tested by using a bias-corrected standard error estimate obtained from 10,000 bootstrapping samples.

The study revealed that both women’s multidimensional empowerment index (MEI) and skilled antenatal care (SANC) had shown the significant association with good ENC practice in both adjusted and unadjusted analyses. The mothers who received eight or more antenatal care visits from skilled health professionals during their pregnancy period were 85% more likely to practice good ENC compared to their counterparts. Similar finding was found in other studies conducted in Bangladesh, Southern Ethiopia, Northern Ghana, Eastern Uganda, Sindhuli District of Nepal, Northwest Ethiopia [49,50,61,62,72]. This is because the health professionals are generally educated and follow national and international quality policies and regulations regarding maternal and child health care and hence pregnant mothers taking antenatal care from skilled health workers can acquire knowledge about newborn health care practice [53,7375]. Moreover, mothers having more follow-ups during pregnancy period may have more access to the information regarding maternal and child health obtained from healthcare providers.

The main exposure of this study was the MEI which was assessed through several dimensions as well as indicators related to women’s empowerment. The study revealed that women’s empowerment had significant positive effect on skilled antenatal care. The likelihood of receiving 8 or more SANC increased as the level of empowerment increased. The finding was consistent with another study conducted in Southeast Asia and the study revealed that the ANC utilization and general health status can be improved by enhancing women’s health related empowerment and social status [48,76]. Another study conducted in Bangladesh also found the similar finding [46].

The direct and indirect effects of average empowerment on ENC practice were not found as significant, but for high empowerment, these effects on good ENC practice were found to be significant, and so did the total effect. Therefore, the study explored that highly empowered mothers were more likely to practice good ENC compared to low empowered mothers (OR 5.05), having the odds ratio of 1.71 from direct influence and 2.41 from indirect influence via SANC. Recall that the highly empowered women satisfied at least 75% of the selected empowerment indicators, which implies that highly empowered women have more access to take their family decisions like healthcare, and also have control over health resources that improve their health as well as the health of their children [4042,44,45,77]. Moreover, the empowered women have more chance to be educated, employed and economically solvent that confirmed the potential role in maternal and child health by utilizing the maternal healthcare knowledge [7880]. Access to medical facilities is also undermined among the lower empowered women, which in turn may create barriers in accessing child healthcare. In addition, highly empowered mothers are more likely to follow the guidelines or advice given by healthcare providers during pregnancy or through media such as newspapers/television, which in turn influences mothers to practice good ENC for the good health of newborns as well as mothers.

Interestingly, the indirect effect of high empowerment through skilled antenatal care was greater than its direct effect on good ENC practice. For example, a highly empowered mother received good ENC practice through SANC indirectly with around 67% and 33% directly. This may be because highly empowered women receiving eight or more antenatal care from skilled health professionals have been able to access maternal and child health services. On the other hand, the empowered mothers may be unable to practice good ENC properly if they fail to receive skilled health care during pregnancy. Therefore, the study revealed that the skilled antenatal care plays an important mediating role to strengthen the relationship between women’s empowerment and good ENC practice.

Strength and limitations

This is the first study that used multidimensional empowerment index (MEI) as a potential contributor in practicing good ENC. The MEI was developed as a composite index assessing five dimensions associated with women’s empowerment. In the study, a mediation technique was applied considering structural equation modeling to find out the mediating role of skilled antenatal care on the relationship between women’s empowerment and good ENC practice. The eight or more antenatal care received from skilled health professionals was defined as skilled antenatal care (SANC) following WHO recommendation. This study found the significant mediating effect as well as the direct effect of women’s empowerment on good ENC practice. Therefore, it can be used as a yardstick and motivation for further study in related areas.

The study also has some limitations. There may have been recalling bias in the study as the mothers selected for the study might failed to remember what they did for their newborns in the early neonatal period. Second, it may not be possible to establish the causal relationship between MEI and good ENC practice as the design of the study was cross-sectional. Moreover, only home births born preceding three years of the survey were considered.

Conclusion

The study evaluated good ENC practice through a number of neonatal care practices, such as safe cord care, optimal thermal care, and neonatal feeding. We have also explored the current rates of skilled antenatal care and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh. The study indicated that the prevalence of good ENC practice in the country was very low which could be accelerated by both skilled antenatal care and women’s empowerment, where skilled antenatal care plays an important mediating role in improving good ENC practice among highly empowered mothers. The study recommends that a woman should be highly empowered if she possesses, on an average, not less than 75% of empowerment in terms of family decision, attitude towards intimate partner violence, social independence, access to healthcare and economic status. Since education is an important indicator to become empowered, women should be highly educated so that they can contribute in breaking barriers to healthcare access, domestic violence, in making household decisions, and in becoming socially independent, and hence women will be multidimensionally empowered. Therefore, policymakers should emphasize in education especially in primary or secondary school so that girls can understand the importance of women’s empowerment. The study further argues that the woman should follow the recent guidelines recommended by WHO for antenatal care follow-up from skilled health workers for good ENC practice. A revised intervention is also needed in receiving skilled antenatal care follow ups especially in rural areas.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank DHS MEASURE for allowing us to use the data set. We would also like to thank the National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT) for implementing BDHS, 2017–2018.

Data Availability

Data are available in a public, open access repository. Data are available on the website (https://dhsprogram.com/data/dataset/Bangladesh_Standard-DHS_2017.cfm?flag=0).

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.WHO, Newborns: improving survival and well-being, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/newborns-reducing-mortality; Accessed at November 10, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jamee A.R., Sen K.K., and Bari W., Examining the influence of correlates on different quantile survival times: infant mortality in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health, 2022. 22: p. 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Majumder S., et al., Knowledge and attitude of essential newborn care among postnatal mothers in Bangladesh. Journal of Health Research, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), and ICF. 2020. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017–18. Dhaka, Bangladesh, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NIPORT and ICF. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.WHO, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); https://www.who.int/health-topics/sustainable-development-goals#tab=tab_2; Accessed at November 10, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mallick L., Yourkavitch J., and Allen C., Trends, determinants, and newborn mortality related to thermal care and umbilical cord care practices in South Asia. BMC pediatrics, 2019. 19: p. 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.UNICEF. Every child alive: the urgent need to end newborn deaths. New York: UNICEF; 2018. https://data.unicef.org/resources/every-child-alive-urgent-need-end-newborn-deaths/; Accessed at November 10, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mersha A., et al., Essential newborn care practice and its predictors among mother who delivered within the past six months in Chencha District, Southern Ethiopia, 2017. PloS one, 2018. 13(12): p. e0208984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bhutta Z.A. and Black R.E., Global maternal, newborn, and child health—so near and yet so far. New England Journal of Medicine, 2013. 369(23): p. 2226–2235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Negussie B., Hailu F., and Megenta A., Knowledge and practice of essential newborn care and associated factors among nurses and midwives working at health centers in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia, 2016. Journal of Nursing & Care, 2018. 7(446): p. 2167–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arba A. and Zana Z., Knowledge of essential newborn care and associated factors among nurses and midwives: a cross-sectional study at public health facilities in Wolaita zone, southern Ethiopia, 2019. International Journal of Pediatrics, 2020. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW) [Bangladesh]. 2017. 4th Health, Population and Nutrition Sector Programme (4th HPNSP) (January 2017-June 2022). Programme Implementation Plan (PIP), Volume I. Dhaka, Bangladesh: MOHFW. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stewart D. and Benitz W., Umbilical cord care in the newborn infant. Pediatrics, 2016. 138(3). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Afolaranmi T.O., et al., Cord care practices: a perspective of contemporary African setting. Frontiers in Public Health, 2018. 6: p. 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mullany L.C. Neonatal hypothermia in low-resource settings. in Seminars in perinatology. 2010. Elsevier. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.World Health Organization (WHO). 2012. Handbook for Guideline Development. Geneva: WHO. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Khan S.M., et al., Thermal care of newborns: drying and bathing practices in Malawi and Bangladesh. Journal of global health, 2018. 8(1). doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.010901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.World Health Organization. Maternal and Newborn Health/Safe Motherhood Unit. Thermal Protection of the Newborn: a practical guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997.
  • 19.Karim F., et al., Initiation of breastfeeding within one hour of birth and its determinants among normal vaginal deliveries at primary and secondary health facilities in Bangladesh: a case-observation study. PloS one, 2018. 13(8): p. e0202508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tura G., Fantahun M., and Worku A., The effect of health facility delivery on neonatal mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2013. 13: p. 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shahjahan M., et al., Factors affecting newborn care practices in Bangladesh. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2012. 26(1): p. 13–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.WHO. New guidelines on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience, 2016. available at https://www.who.int/news/item/07-11-2016-new-guidelines-on-antenatal-care-for-a-positive-pregnancy-experience; Accessed at Novemeber 17, 2021.
  • 23.Afulani P.A., et al., Quality of antenatal care and associated factors in a rural county in Kenya: an assessment of service provision and experience dimensions. BMC health services research, 2019. 19: p. 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jamee A.R., Sen K.K., and Bari W., Skilled maternal healthcare and good essential newborn care practice in rural Bangladesh: A cross‐sectional study. Health Science Reports, 2022. 5(5): p. e791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shibre G., et al., Women empowerment and uptake of antenatal care services: A meta-analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys from 33 Sub-Saharan African countries. Archives of Public Health, 2021. 79: p. 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cooke J.G. and Tahir F., Maternal health in Nigeria. Center for Strategic & International Studies, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hossain B. and Hoque A.A., Women empowerment and antenatal care utilization in Bangladesh. The Journal of Developing Areas, 2015: p. 109–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Crissman H.P., Adanu R.M., and Harlow S.D., Women’s sexual empowerment and contraceptive use in Ghana. Studies in family planning, 2012. 43(3): p. 201–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Corroon M., et al., The role of gender empowerment on reproductive health outcomes in urban Nigeria. Maternal and child health journal, 2014. 18(1): p. 307–315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Haque S.E., et al., Reproductive health care utilization among young mothers in Bangladesh: does autonomy matter? Women’s Health Issues, 2012. 22(2): p. e171–e180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bashemera D.R., Nhembo M.J., and Benedict G., The role of women’s empowerment in influencing HIV testing. Available at [http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/WP101/WP101.pdf]. DHS WORKING PAPERS, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chowdhury S., et al., Achieving millennium development goals 4 and 5 in Bangladesh. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2011. 118: p. 36–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rubayet S., et al., Newborn survival in Bangladesh: a decade of change and future implications. Health Policy and Planning, 2012. 27(suppl_3): p. iii40–iii56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sreeramareddy C.T., et al., Home delivery and newborn care practices among urban women in western Nepal: a questionnaire survey. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2006. 6: p. 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Abreha S.K., Walelign S.Z., and Zereyesus Y.A., Associations between women’s empowerment and children’s health status in Ethiopia. PloS one, 2020. 15(7): p. e0235825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ewerling F., et al., SWPER Global: A survey-based women’s empowerment index expanded from Africa to all low-and middle-income countries. Journal of global health, 2020. 10(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Alkire S. and Foster J., Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of public economics, 2011. 95(7–8): p. 476–487. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.MacKinnon D.P., Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. 2012: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Duflo E., Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic literature, 2012. 50(4): p. 1051–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mabsout R., Capability and health functioning in Ethiopian households. Social Indicators Research, 2011. 101(3): p. 359–389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pratley P., Associations between quantitative measures of women’s empowerment and access to care and health status for mothers and their children: a systematic review of evidence from the developing world. Social Science & Medicine, 2016. 169: p. 119–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kuche D., et al., Factors associated with dietary diversity and length‐for‐age z‐score in rural Ethiopian children aged 6–23 months: A novel approach to the analysis of baseline data from the Sustainable Undernutrition Reduction in Ethiopia evaluation. Maternal & child nutrition, 2020. 16(1): p. e12852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tiruneh F.N., Chuang K.-Y., and Chuang Y.-C., Women’s autonomy and maternal healthcare service utilization in Ethiopia. BMC health services research, 2017. 17: p. 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pennington A., et al., The health impacts of women’s low control in their living environment: a theory-based systematic review of observational studies in societies with profound gender discrimination. Health & place, 2018. 51: p. 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Richards E., et al., Going beyond the surface: gendered intra-household bargaining as a social determinant of child health and nutrition in low and middle income countries. Social science & medicine, 2013. 95: p. 24–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Anik A.I., Ghose B., and Rahman M.M., Relationship between maternal healthcare utilisation and empowerment among women in Bangladesh: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ open, 2021. 11(8): p. e049167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kaye D.K., et al., Domestic violence during pregnancy and risk of low birthweight and maternal complications: a prospective cohort study at Mulago Hospital, Uganda. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 2006. 11(10): p. 1576–1584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Koski A.D., Stephenson R., and Koenig M.R., Physical violence by partner during pregnancy and use of prenatal care in rural India. Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2011. 29(3): p. 245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Saaka M. and Iddrisu M., Patterns and determinants of essential newborn care practices in rural areas of northern Ghana. International Journal of Population Research, 2014. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Owor M.O., et al., Factors associated with adoption of beneficial newborn care practices in rural eastern Uganda: a cross-sectional study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. 16: p. 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tuladhar S., The Determinants of Good Newborn Care Practices in the Rural Areas of Nepal. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Amsalu E.T., et al., The effects of ANC follow up on essential newborn care practices in east Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 2021. 11(1): p. 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. National neonatal health strategy and Guidelines for Bangladesh. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sen K.K. and Nilima S., Women’s Empowerment and Its Determinants in Bangladesh: Evidence from a National Survey. The Dhaka University Journal of Science, 2018. 66(2): p. 129–134. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Islam U.N., Sen K.K., and Bari W., Living standard and access to tetanus toxoid immunization among women in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health, 2022. 22: p. 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sen K.K., Nilima S., and Khokan M.R., Readiness of Health Facilities to Provide Child Curative Care Services: Evidence Based on Bangladesh Health Facility Survey, 2014. The Dhaka University Journal of Science, 2020. 68(1): p. 29–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Tunçalp Ӧ., et al., WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience—going beyond survival. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2017. 124(6): p. 860–862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ahinkorah B.O., et al., Factors associated with the number and timing of antenatal care visits among married women in Cameroon: evidence from the 2018 Cameroon Demographic and Health Survey. Journal of Biosocial Science, 2022. 54(2): p. 322–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Imo C.K., Influence of women’s decision-making autonomy on antenatal care utilisation and institutional delivery services in Nigeria: evidence from the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2022. 22(1): p. 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tessema Z.T., Tesema G.A., and Yazachew L., Individual-level and community-level factors associated with eight or more antenatal care contacts in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from 36 sub-Saharan African countries. BMJ open, 2022. 12(3): p. e049379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Akter T., Dawson A., and Sibbritt D., The determinants of essential newborn care for home births in Bangladesh. Public health, 2016. 141: p. 7–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tegene T., et al., Newborn care practice and associated factors among mothers who gave birth within one year in Mandura District, Northwest Ethiopia. Clinics in Mother and Child Health, 2015. 12(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Teshome K., Aychiluhm M., and Degu G., Community based essential newborn care practices and associated factors among women in the rural community of Awabel district. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research, 2015. 1(01): p. 17–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Misgna H.G., Gebru H.B., and Birhanu M.M., Knowledge, practice and associated factors of essential newborn care at home among mothers in Gulomekada District, Eastern Tigray, Ethiopia, 2014. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. 16: p. 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Callaghan-Koru J.A., et al., Newborn care practices at home and in health facilities in 4 regions of Ethiopia. BMC pediatrics, 2013. 13: p. 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Yeshiwork E., Assessment of Level of Knowledge and Practice of Essential Newborn Care and Its Determinants among Recently Delivered Women in Ficthe Town, North Shewa Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Delele T.G., et al., Essential Newborn Care Service Readiness and Barriers in Northwest Ethiopia: A Descriptive Survey and Qualitative Study. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 2021. 14: p. 713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), Mitra and Associates, and ICF International. 2013. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2011. Dhaka, Bangladesh and Calverton, Maryland, USA: NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, and ICF International. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), Mitra and Associates, and ICF International. 2016. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Dhaka, Bangladesh, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, and ICF International. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ali F. and Nasortaha R., Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of nurse-midwives towards immediate care of the newborn in Khartoum state teaching hospitals (2011). J Am Sci, 2013. 9(9): p. 263–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Castalino F., Nayak B.S., and D’Souza A., Knowledge and practices of postnatal mothers on newborn care in Tertiary care hospital of Udupi District. ournal of Health and Allied Sciences NU, 2014. 4(02): p. 098–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chaudhary J., Dhungana G., and Ghimire H.C., Factors affecting newborn care practices among Tharu mothers in selected Vilalge development committees of Chitwan distract. Journal of Chitwan medical college, 2013. 3(1): p. 42–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Al Kibria G.M., et al., Factors affecting deliveries attended by skilled birth attendants in Bangladesh. Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology, 2017. 3(1): p. 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Al Kibria G.M., et al., A comparison of practices, distributions and determinants of birth attendance in two divisions with highest and lowest skilled delivery attendance in Bangladesh. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. 18: p. 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Khanal V., et al., Poor thermal care practices among home births in Nepal: further analysis of Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2011. PloS one, 2014. 9(2): p. e89950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sohn M. and Jung M., Effects of empowerment and media use by women of childbearing age on maternal health care utilization in developing countries of Southeast Asia. International Journal of Health Services, 2020. 50(1): p. 32–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Stiyaningsih H. and Wicaksono F., Impact of women’s empowerment on infant mortality in Indonesia. Kesmas: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional (National Public Health Journal), 2017. 11(4): p. 185–191. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Yadav A.K., Sahni B., and Jena P.K., Education, employment, economic status and empowerment: Implications for maternal health care services utilization in India. Journal of Public Affairs, 2020: p. e2259. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Adhikari R., Effect of Women’s autonomy on maternal health service utilization in Nepal: a cross sectional study. BMC women’s health, 2016. 16: p. 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Adhikari R. and Sawangdee Y., Influence of women’s autonomy on infant mortality in Nepal. Reproductive health, 2011. 8(1): p. 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Gouranga Lal Dasvarma

14 Nov 2022

PONE-D-22-01899Women's multidimensional empowerment index and essential newborn care practice in Bangladesh: the mediating role of skilled antenatal care follow-upsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kanchan Kumar Sen, 

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by 12 December 2022. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labelled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Gouranga Lal Dasvarma, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

If you are reporting a retrospective study of medical records or archived samples, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

3. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Under the provisions of PLOS One Editorial Office, I have invited myself as the second reviewer of your manuscript.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. The topic is important for public health issue, especially in maternal and child health. I have some comments to improve the manuscript:

Introduction: The topic of empowerment has to be introduced in this section. How is women empowerment defined? Is there a framework used to define women’s empowerment components? This must be justified and supported by literature.

Methods: Explain why author used weighting approach to create the empowerment component.

Results: In Table 2, column 4 is not clear.

Discussion:

There could be more a more detailed comparison of the results here with previous results. As we go from the top quartile of empowerment to the bottom quartile, how large is the change in the probability of SANC or ENC in other studies? Even if the other studies use different methods and different empowerment measures, it should still be possible to the infer the differences between the top and bottom quartiles in these studies.

Policy implications are not clear.

Conclusions drawn are supported by findings.

Reviewer #2: This is a useful and innovative study with potential policy implications. It is not certain to this reviewer whether the idea of using antenatal care-visits as a mediating factor between women’s empowerment and essential newborn care is completely new, but it is a refreshing approach, especially in measuring women’s empowerment from a multi-dimensional angle. However, there are several points, stated below, which need to be addressed satisfactorily before the manuscript may be considered for publication.

General comments:

• Language editing: The manuscript must be professionally edited for English, particularly for use of articles such as “the” and tense. The manuscript is supposed to describe and explain the findings of a current research, yet some of the sentences read as if they are reporting past research.

• Writing style. The style of writing is often too cryptic, especially in the presentation of tables. Table and figure headings should be self-explanatory, and the source of all the tables and figures must be noted. Even if the tables and figures are drawn by the authors based on their analysis of data, these should be mentioned as such.

• Statistical analyses of data: In general, the idea of calculating the direct and indirect effects of women’s empowerment on ENC practice is noteworthy. However, please confirm whether it was necessary to adjust for complex design in conducting logistic regression on data extracted from BDHS 2017-18, which is based on complex sampling. Please also explain what was involved in “wrangling” the data, as BDHS 2017-18 data must have been cleaned before being released for use.

Specific comments:

• Lines 14-15, and 138-139. Please explain why only home births are considered in this research. According to Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017-18 (BDHS 2017-18. Chapter 9), almost one half (49%) of the births in the preceding three years were delivered at a health facility.

• Line 58. “intrapartum, conditions of labour”. Do you mean intrapartum conditions of labour (i.e. no comma)?

• Lines 142-154. Re initial care for babies after birth: Does “cord care” include Used safe

delivery kit/bag or boiled blade during delivery, Applied chlorhexidine after umbilical

cord was cut and tied (BDHS 2017-18 report Table 9.24? Re joint groupings. Where have you shown in your manuscript the joint groupings for safe cord care and optimal thermal care respectively, reported from previous studies?

• Lines 156-162. Re components of women’s empowerment index. Why is women’s education used as a barrier to accessing healthcare and not as a part of household decision making autonomy? How valid is the assumption to consider household assets as proxy for women’s assets, when in fact household assets are most likely to be held jointly with husbands and possibly members of the extended family?

• Lines 162-166. What is the justification of assigning equal weights to each dimension? Why did you not use Factor Analysis and find the weights from Factor Loadings?

• Lines 177-185. Formula for individual score. Please re-write the formula as it does not contain the symbol ‘n’ (noted in Line 180) and symbols denoting the weights of indicator and dimension.

• Lines 191-196. Re the new WHO guidelines about at least eight Skilled ANC (SANC) visits. The new guidelines were formulated in 2016. In your analysis you have applied the new recommendations to births and pregnancies occurring in the three years preceding the survey, which was conducted in 2017-18, i.e. births and pregnancies occurring during 2015-2018 or before. As such, many births and associated SANC visits (or non-visits) must have happened before the new guidelines came into effect (when at least 4 SANC visits were recommended). Under such circumstances how justified are you in considering a cut-off of less than 8 and 8 or more SANC visits in analysing the mediating effects of skilled antenatal care?

• Line 198. “gender of index child”. It appears from an inspection of Table 2 that the index child is the child whose antenatal care is the subject of this study. As such, selecting “gender of the index child” as a control variable does not make sense because it is not possible to know the gender of the child at the antenatal stage, unless tests like ultrasound or amniocentesis are done, which most women would not have done in this case. Therefore, this variable should be removed from the list of control variables and the analysis should be re-done.

• Lines 207-211. Statistical Analysis. Please confirm whether it was necessary to adjust for complex design in conducting logistic regression on data extracted from BDHS 2017-18, which is based on complex sampling. Please also explain what was involved in “wrangling” the data, as BDHS 2017-18 data must have been cleaned before being released for use.

• Table 2. Please make the table heading self-explanatory by stating the covariates of which indicator you have presented in the table based on what test. Please also provide, in parentheses the range of values of Low, Average and High Women’s Empowerment Index. What values are shown under the column heading “Good ENC Practice”? Are these the point estimates of each variable and their 95% Confidence Intervals? Please write the source of this table (and other tables and figures). If this table is based on your own calculations, then please write the source somewhat as this: “Computed by the authors based on their analysis of BDHS 2017-18 data”.

• Fig 1. (Should write in full, as “Figure 1”). Please calculate if possible, the Direct Effect of MEI on ENC Practice, and the effects of MEI on Skilled ANC and Skilled ANC on ENC Practice respectively and show them in the diagram.

• Fig 2(a).This figure (and its parent table in BDHS 2017-18-Table 9.24) appears a little confusing with respect to cord care and nothing applied to cord, both of which are indicators of cord care. Therefore, please explain how 86.7% of home delivered births in the last three years had Used safe delivery kit/bag or boiled blade during delivery, applied chlorhexidine after umbilical cord was cut and tied and 44.1% had nothing applied to cord. Should these two percentages not add to 100?

• Fig 2(b). “ENC practice is considered as a binary random variable, where 1 indicates good ENC and 0 for the poor ENC. A newborn is said to be received good ENC if all five components were practiced; whereas the practice is poor if he/she missed any of the components”. (Lines 151-164 of this manuscript). In the context of this definition, please explain the five categories of ENC practice displayed in Fig 2(b).

• Please also examine all the other diagrams (and tables) and check them for missing information or lack of clarity.

• Lines 410-422. In conclusion you have recommended “that a woman should be highly empowered …”. Can you suggest what specific measures should be taken to make women highly empowered in order to possess “not less than 75% of empowerment”?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 7;18(2):e0281369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281369.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


4 Dec 2022

Authors’ Response to Journal Requirements and Reviewer’s Comments

Journal Requirements

Comment # 01

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Authors’ Response:

The PLOS ONE's style requirements have been followed in writing the manuscript.

Comment # 02

In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

If you are reporting a retrospective study of medical records or archived samples, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

Authors’ Response:

It has been taken care of.

Comment # 03

Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript.

Authors’ Response:

The ethics statement has been moved to the Methods section in the revised manuscript.

Reviewer Comments

Reviewer # 1

Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. The topic is important for public health issue, especially in maternal and child health. I have some comments to improve the manuscript:

Dear Reviewer:

Thank you very much for your effort in reviewing our manuscript and for your thoughtful suggestions. We have modified the manuscript according to your comment and detailed corrections are listed below, point by point. All changes are highlighted in blue color in this revised manuscript with track changes.

Comment # 01

Introduction: The topic of empowerment has to be introduced in this section. How is women empowerment defined? Is there a framework used to define women’s empowerment components? This must be justified and supported by literature.

Authors’ Response:

Thank you very much for your valuable comment. We have mentioned the women’s empowerment along with its dimensions in the introduction section of the revised manuscript (Please see the lines 91-100 of the revised manuscript file).

Comment # 02

Methods: Explain why author used weighting approach to create the empowerment component.

Authors’ Response:

The previous studies constructed multiple components or factors of women’s empowerment. But we constructed single composite score to define the level of women’s empowerment using a weighting approach. To construct the weighting score, we followed a study on multidimensional poverty measures proposed by Alkire and Foster (2011). The reason has been in the method section. (Please see the lines 203-207)

Reference. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of public economics, 95(7-8), 476-487.

Comment # 03

Results: In Table 2, column 4 is not clear.

Authors’ Response:

We revised the Table 2, and we included a footnote in the table for understanding the table.

Comment # 04

Discussion:

There could be more a more detailed comparison of the results here with previous results. As we go from the top quartile of empowerment to the bottom quartile, how large is the change in the probability of SANC or ENC in other studies? Even if the other studies use different methods and different empowerment measures, it should still be possible to the infer the differences between the top and bottom quartiles in these studies.

Authors’ Response:

Thank you very much for your comment. To the best of our knowledge, no research has been conducted on the relationship between women's empowerment and ENC practice. As a result, we were unable to compare our findings to those of other studies.

Comment # 05

Policy implications are not clear. Conclusions drawn are supported by findings.

Authors’ Response:

We revised the conclusion part in the revised manuscript.

Reviewer # 2

This is a useful and innovative study with potential policy implications. It is not certain to this reviewer whether the idea of using antenatal care-visits as a mediating factor between women’s empowerment and essential newborn care is completely new, but it is a refreshing approach, especially in measuring women’s empowerment from a multi-dimensional angle. However, there are several points, stated below, which need to be addressed satisfactorily before the manuscript may be considered for publication.

Dear Reviewer:

Thank you very much for your effort in reviewing our manuscript and for your valuable comments. We have modified the manuscript according to your comment and detailed corrections are listed below, point by point. All changes are highlighted in blue color in this revised manuscript with track changes.

Comment # 01

Language editing: The manuscript must be professionally edited for English, particularly for use of articles such as “the” and tense. The manuscript is supposed to describe and explain the findings of a current research, yet some of the sentences read as if they are reporting past research.

Authors’ Response:

Thank you very much. The manuscript has been revised accordingly.

Comment # 02

Writing style. The style of writing is often too cryptic, especially in the presentation of tables. Table and figure headings should be self-explanatory, and the source of all the tables and figures must be noted. Even if the tables and figures are drawn by the authors based on their analysis of data, these should be mentioned as such.

Authors’ Response:

It has been taken care of.

Comment # 03

Statistical analyses of data: In general, the idea of calculating the direct and indirect effects of women’s empowerment on ENC practice is noteworthy. However, please confirm whether it was necessary to adjust for complex design in conducting logistic regression on data extracted from BDHS 2017-18, which is based on complex sampling. Please also explain what was involved in “wrangling” the data, as BDHS 2017-18 data must have been cleaned before being released for use.

Authors’ Response:

Thank you very much for your valuable comments. BDHS data followed a complex survey design. In our revised manuscript, we revised our all analysis after addressing complex survey design using svy setting in Stata. We also took into account the cluster variation in our regression analysis using multilevel or mixed-effect binary logistic regression model. Again, the word “wrangling” was used in the statistical analysis section. Actually, in our selected dataset, some characteristics were missing for some individuals, and hence we discarded these individuals from our dataset. For this case, we used the mentioned word “wrangling”. In the revised manuscript, we delated the word.

(Specific Comments)

Comment # 04

Lines 14-15, and 138-139. Please explain why only home births are considered in this research. According to Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017-18 (BDHS 2017-18. Chapter 9), almost one half (49%) of the births in the preceding three years were delivered at a health facility.

Authors’ Response:

The Bangladesh demographic and health survey (BDHS), 2017-18 reported the essential newborn care practices for home births only, In the original data set, we also did not find the information on ENC indicators for institutional births. For this reason, we only included home births only in our study. We added this reason in the revised manuscript (Please see the lines: 152-154).

Comment # 05

Line 58. “intrapartum, conditions of labour”. Do you mean intrapartum conditions of labour (i.e. no comma)?

Authors’ Response:

We have written the words correctly on the manuscript.

Comment # 06

Lines 142-154. Re initial care for babies after birth: Does “cord care” include Used safe

delivery kit/bag or boiled blade during delivery, Applied chlorhexidine after umbilical

cord was cut and tied (BDHS 2017-18 report Table 9.24? Re joint groupings. Where have you shown in your manuscript the joint groupings for safe cord care and optimal thermal care respectively, reported from previous studies?

Authors’ Response:

We revised the lines 142-154. According to BDHS 2017-18 report cord care include used safe delivery kit/bag or boiled blade during delivery. The nothing applied to the cord or only chlorhexidine applied is another component of ENC.

Comment # 07

Lines 156-162. Re components of women’s empowerment index. Why is women’s education used as a barrier to accessing healthcare and not as a part of household decision making autonomy? How valid is the assumption to consider household assets as proxy for women’s assets, when in fact household assets are most likely to be held jointly with husbands and possibly members of the extended family?

Authors’ Response:

It has been taken care of. Women’s education is included in the social independence domain of women’s empowerment.

Comment # 08

Lines 162-166. What is the justification of assigning equal weights to each dimension? Why did you not use Factor Analysis and find the weights from Factor Loadings?

Authors’ Response:

The previous studies constructed multiple components or factors of women’s empowerment. But we constructed single composite score to define the level of women’s empowerment using a weighting approach. To construct the weighting score, we followed a study on multidimensional poverty measures proposed by Alkire and Foster (2011). The reason has been in the method section. (Please see the lines 203-207)

Reference: Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of public economics, 95(7-8), 476-487.

Comment # 09

Lines 177-185. Formula for individual score. Please re-write the formula as it does not contain the symbol ‘n’ (noted in Line 180) and symbols denoting the weights of indicator and dimension.

Authors’ Response:

It has been corrected.

Comment # 10

Lines 191-196. Re the new WHO guidelines about at least eight Skilled ANC (SANC) visits. The new guidelines were formulated in 2016. In your analysis you have applied the new recommendations to births and pregnancies occurring in the three years preceding the survey, which was conducted in 2017-18, i.e. births and pregnancies occurring during 2015-2018 or before. As such, many births and associated SANC visits (or non-visits) must have happened before the new guidelines came into effect (when at least 4 SANC visits were recommended). Under such circumstances how justified are you in considering a cut-off of less than 8 and 8 or more SANC visits in analysing the mediating effects of skilled antenatal care?

Authors’ Response:

One of the objectives of this study is to examine whether ENC practice increases with the increase of ANC visits. For this reason, we have used the newly proposed cut off point for ANC visits to observe how it works on ENC practices. The reason has also been included in the revised manuscript.

Comment # 11

Line 198. “gender of index child”. It appears from an inspection of Table 2 that the index child is the child whose antenatal care is the subject of this study. As such, selecting “gender of the index child” as a control variable does not make sense because it is not possible to know the gender of the child at the antenatal stage, unless tests like ultrasound or amniocentesis are done, which most women would not have done in this case. Therefore, this variable should be removed from the list of control variables and the analysis should be re-done.

Authors’ Response:

We reanalyzed the data after discarding the variable “gender of index child”.

Comment # 12

Lines 207-211. Statistical Analysis. Please confirm whether it was necessary to adjust for complex design in conducting logistic regression on data extracted from BDHS 2017-18, which is based on complex sampling. Please also explain what was involved in “wrangling” the data, as BDHS 2017-18 data must have been cleaned before being released for use.

Authors’ Response:

BDHS data followed a complex survey design. In our revised manuscript, we revised our all analysis after addressing complex survey design using svy setting in Stata. We also took into account the cluster variation in our regression analysis using multilevel or mixed-effect binary logistic regression model. Again, the word “wrangling” was used in the statistical analysis section. Actually, in our selected dataset, some characteristics were missing for some individuals, and hence we discarded these individuals from our dataset. For this case, we used the mentioned word “wrangling”. In the revised manuscript, we delated the word.

Comment # 13

Table 2. Please make the table heading self-explanatory by stating the covariates of which indicator you have presented in the table based on what test. Please also provide, in parentheses the range of values of Low, Average and High Women’s Empowerment Index. What values are shown under the column heading “Good ENC Practice”? Are these the point estimates of each variable and their 95% Confidence Intervals? Please write the source of this table (and other tables and figures). If this table is based on your own calculations, then please write the source somewhat as this: “Computed by the authors based on their analysis of BDHS 2017-18 data”.

Authors’ Response:

It has been taken care of.

Comment # 14

Fig 1. (Should write in full, as “Figure 1”). Please calculate if possible, the Direct Effect of MEI on ENC Practice, and the effects of MEI on Skilled ANC and Skilled ANC on ENC Practice respectively and show them in the diagram.

Authors’ Response:

The Direct Effect of MEI on ENC Practice, and the effects of MEI on Skilled ANC and Skilled ANC on ENC practice were reported in Table 3.

Comment # 15

Fig 2(a).This figure (and its parent table in BDHS 2017-18-Table 9.24) appears a little confusing with respect to cord care and nothing applied to cord, both of which are indicators of cord care. Therefore, please explain how 86.7% of home delivered births in the last three years had Used safe delivery kit/bag or boiled blade during delivery, applied chlorhexidine after umbilical cord was cut and tied and 44.1% had nothing applied to cord. Should these two percentages not add to 100?

Authors’ Response:

According to BDHS 2017-18 report we measure the five ENC components. Cord care include used safe delivery kit/bag or boiled blade during delivery. The nothing applied to the cord or only chlorhexidine applied is another component of ENC. Therefore, these two percentages are not to be 100. It is noted that nothing applied to the cord means no substances are used after cutting the umbilical cord.

Comment # 16

Fig 2(b). “ENC practice is considered as a binary random variable, where 1 indicates good ENC and 0 for the poor ENC. A newborn is said to be received good ENC if all five components were practiced; whereas the practice is poor if he/she missed any of the components”. (Lines 151-164 of this manuscript). In the context of this definition, please explain the five categories of ENC practice displayed in Fig 2(b).

Authors’ Response:

It has been taken care of.

Comment # 17

Please also examine all the other diagrams (and tables) and check them for missing information or lack of clarity.

Authors’ Response:

It has been taken care of accordingly.

Comment # 18

Lines 410-422. In conclusion you have recommended “that a woman should be highly empowered …”. Can you suggest what specific measures should be taken to make women highly empowered in order to possess “not less than 75% of empowerment”?

Authors’ Response:

The conclusion has been revised accordingly.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Gouranga Lal Dasvarma

11 Jan 2023

PONE-D-22-01899R1Women's multidimensional empowerment index and essential newborn care practice in Bangladesh: the mediating role of skilled antenatal care follow-upsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kanchan Kumar Sen, 

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. These are only minor comments and should be able to be addressed in less than a week.

==============================

PONE-D-22-01899R1  Kanchan Kumar Sen

  • Reviewer#2 - Comment 10. “Lines 191-196.”Re the new WHO guidelines about at least eight Skilled ANC (SANC) visits. The new guidelines were formulated in 2016. In your analysis you have applied the new recommendations to births and pregnancies occurring in the three years preceding the survey, which was conducted in 2017-18, i.e. births and pregnancies occurring during 2015-2018 or before. As such, many births and associated SANC visits (or non-visits) must have happened before the new guidelines came into effect (when at least 4 SANC visits were recommended). Under such circumstances how justified are you in considering a cut-off of less than 8 and 8 or more SANC visits in analysing the mediating effects of skilled antenatal care?” is not addressed satisfactorily (Lines 231-240 of the revised manuscript). Please explain the reason why you have considered a cut-off of less than 8 and 8 or more SANC visits while the previous guideline of 4 skilled ANC visits was still followed when most of the births included in your study took place.

  • Reviewer#2 – Comment 16. Your response “It has ben taken care of”. How have you taken care of it? Have you removed Figure 2(b) and retained Figure 2(a) as the only Figure 2??

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 25 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Gouranga Lal Dasvarma, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Thank you for revising the manuscript. Two minor comments still remain to be addressed as follows:

PONE-D-22-01899R1 Kanchan Kumar Sen

• Reviewer#2 - Comment 10. “Lines 191-196.”Re the new WHO guidelines about at least eight Skilled ANC (SANC) visits. The new guidelines were formulated in 2016. In your analysis you have applied the new recommendations to births and pregnancies occurring in the three years

preceding the survey, which was conducted in 2017-18, i.e. births and pregnancies occurring during 2015-2018 or before. As such, many births and associated SANC visits (or non-visits) must have happened before the new guidelines came into effect (when at least 4 SANC visits

were recommended). Under such circumstances how justified are you in considering a cut-off of less than 8 and 8 or more SANC visits in analysing the mediating effects of skilled antenatal care?” is not addressed satisfactorily (Lines 231-240 of the revised manuscript). Please

explain the reason why you have considered a cut-off of less than 8 and 8 or more SANC visits while the previous guideline of 4 skilled ANC visits was still followed when most of the births included in your study took place.

• Reviewer#2 – Comment 16. Your response “It has ben taken care of”. How have you taken care of it? Have you removed Figure 2(b) and retained Figure 2(a) as the only Figure 2??

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 7;18(2):e0281369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281369.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


15 Jan 2023

Authors’ Response to Reviewer’s Comments

Reviewer # 2

Dear Reviewer:

Thank you very much for your effort in reviewing our manuscript and for your valuable comments. We have modified the manuscript according to your comments, and detailed corrections are listed below, point by point. All changes are highlighted in blue color in this revised manuscript with track changes.

Comment # 1

Comment 10. “Lines 191-196.”Re the new WHO guidelines about at least eight Skilled ANC (SANC) visits. The new guidelines were formulated in 2016. In your analysis you have applied the new recommendations to births and pregnancies occurring in the three years preceding the survey, which was conducted in 2017-18, i.e. births and pregnancies occurring during 2015-2018 or before. As such, many births and associated SANC visits (or non-visits) must have happened before the new guidelines came into effect (when at least 4 SANC visits were recommended). Under such circumstances how justified are you in considering a cut-off of less than 8 and 8 or more SANC visits in analyzing the mediating effects of skilled antenatal care?” is not addressed satisfactorily (Lines 231-240 of the revised manuscript). Please explain the reason why you have considered a cut-off of less than 8 and 8 or more SANC visits while the previous guideline of 4 skilled ANC visits was still followed when most of the births included in your study took place.

Authors’ Response:

Thank you for your thoughtful observation. All pregnant women and adolescent girls should follow the updated WHO recommendation released in 2016 to receive antenatal care (ANC). The guideline is also intended for national and local policymakers, implementers and managers of national and local mother and child health programs, non-governmental and other organizations, public health policymakers and health professionals. In accordance with a human rights-based perspective, the guide strives to capture the complex nature of the concerns facing ANC health care practices and delivery, and to promote person-centered health and well-being over death and morbidity prevention. As a result, adherence to the guidelines is necessary. In this study, however, we also followed the WHO guideline on ANC visits (2016) to observe how eight or more ANC visits influence good essential newborn care practice. Despite the fact that many of the births and related ANC visits (or non-visits) included in the study occurred prior to the revised guidelines, our study will provide more evidence to follow the most recent WHO guideline on ANC visits to ensure appropriate ENC practice. The study looked into whether or not the new guideline works in terms of receiving good ENC before adopting it. Furthermore, the current WHO recommendation on ANC visits was used in the literature, which included data from the 2018 Demographic and Health Survey [1–3]. The reason has also been included in the revised manuscript. The changes are highlighted in the revised manuscript with blue color (See page- 13,14, lines- 228-235).

References

1. Ahinkorah BO, Seidu AA, Budu E, Mohammed A, Adu C, Agbaglo E, et al. Factors associated with the number and timing of antenatal care visits among married women in Cameroon: Evidence from the 2018 Cameroon Demographic and Health Survey. J Biosoc Sci. 2021. doi:10.1017/S0021932021000079

2. Imo CK. Influence of women’s decision-making autonomy on antenatal care utilisation and institutional delivery services in Nigeria: evidence from the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22: 1–12. doi:10.1186/s12884-022-04478-5

3. Tessema ZT, Tesema GA, Yazachew L. Individual-level and community-level factors associated with eight or more antenatal care contacts in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from 36 sub-Saharan African countries. BMJ Open. 2022;12: 1–8. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049379

Comment # 2

Comment 16. Your response “It has been taken care of”. How have you taken care of it? Have you removed Figure 2(b) and retained Figure 2(a) as the only Figure 2??

Authors’ Response:

Thank you very much for your comment. According to your previous comment, we updated the explanation of Fig. 2(b) in the revised manuscript. Both (a) and (b) are included in the Figure 2. The changes are highlighted in the revised manuscript with blue color (See page-15,16, lines-280-290).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Gouranga Lal Dasvarma

23 Jan 2023

Women's multidimensional empowerment index and essential newborn care practice in Bangladesh: the mediating role of skilled antenatal care follow-ups

PONE-D-22-01899R2

Dear Dr. Kanchan Kumar Sen, 

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Gouranga Lal Dasvarma, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Gouranga Lal Dasvarma

27 Jan 2023

PONE-D-22-01899R2

Women's multidimensional empowerment index and essential newborn care practice in Bangladesh: the mediating role of skilled antenatal care follow-ups

Dear Dr. Sen:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Gouranga Lal Dasvarma

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Data are available in a public, open access repository. Data are available on the website (https://dhsprogram.com/data/dataset/Bangladesh_Standard-DHS_2017.cfm?flag=0).


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES