Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, nurses experienced tremendous dilemmas including the need to perform their duties in caring for patients while they have concerns about contracting the disease. This study described the moral distress of nurses in-charge of handling COVID-19 patients which can be used as baseline data for intervention programs in overcoming moral distress among nurses. This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted with nurses in-charge of handling COVID-19 treatment rooms. Before conducting the survey, ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Faculty of Universitas Hasanuddin. Questionnaires on moral distress for clinical nurses and the demographic data questionnaire were distributed to 128 respondents. These nurses experienced relatively low levels of moral distress despite the fact that they were generally exposed to morally stressful situations. Education background appeared as a factor influencing this condition, in which higher moral distress was mostly experienced by nurses with undergraduate education.
Keywords: Moral distress, nurses, caring, COVID-19, pandemic
Introduction
Moral distress is a fundamental issue in nursing care,1 nurses are mentioned to take many ethical resolutions every day,2 but in practice, they cannot always serve in conformity with their decisions. According to Jameton3 definition, Moral distress appears when one knows the right thing to do, but the institutional barrier makes it nearly impossible to follow the right course of action. Moral distress is a condition where health workers experience tension/stress caused by a contradictory health care situation they experience, in which, in this situation, they know what to do but cannot do anything. Hence, the nurses act in a way that is contrary to their personal and professional values, which could break their integrity.1,4 Burston and Tuckett5 stated that the contributing factors for the development of moral distress are individual practitioners, site-specific systems and broader external influences.
Moral distress varies based on the work atmosphere,6 COVID-19 pandemic becomes an unexpected and unprecedented challenge.7 This pandemic is causing tremendous pressure on health workers, especially nurses, in which they are expected to continue working as usual. On the one hand, they become the forefront of providing services to the patients of COVID-19. On the other hand, they still need to take care of themselves against infected patients with a high risk of transmission.8 This condition can cause moral distress for nurses.
During this pandemic, various dilemmas have occurred to nurses, including how to balance their duties in caring for patients, their concerns about the infection of the coronavirus, and their concerns about which they can transmit the virus to their families.9 Nurses lacking experience in addressing ethically challenging situations may be at higher risk of experiencing moral distress.10
This concern tends to be clearer among elder health workers as well as those with limited availability of personal protective equipment (PPE). Nurses struggle physically in unsafe conditions like insufficient supplies of PPE.9 In this regard, results of the study by Burston and Tuckett5 revealed that the lack of resources may facilitate or directly contribute to situations of moral distress, an imbalance between supply and demand of resources influences affecting an institution's ability for service delivery.
Another thing that can promote moral distress is when encountered with the choice between maintaining ventilator support for patients of COVID-19 with the critical condition in which the patients indeed can no longer survive and giving the ventilator to patients with an excellent prognosis. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers are in an uncomfortable position in which they must select the choice to allocate fewer resources to the patients who require them most.11 Dimensions of site-specific care and caring contribute to moral distress.5 In a similar care context, Kälvemark et al.12 identify a lack of beds for patient care dispatch and others an in accordance with the environment for the stipulation of palliative as a contributor to the moral distress of nurses.
Nurses worry about their professional, ethical and legal protections when asked to provide care in high-risk situations, like the COVID-19 pandemic.11 The existence of nurses’ moral distress is critically important to pay attention to because it can influence clinical decisions, increase the possibility of medical errors, and ultimately increase the risk of fatigue experienced by nurses.13, 14 Moral distress has been widely reviewed across many care contexts, but no study was found on the issues of moral distress among nurses in a pandemic situation like a COVID-19 pandemic.
The study aims at discovering the picture of the moral distress experienced by nurses handling the patients of COVID-19, and at determining the relationship between the moral distress of nurses and the sociodemographic factors. This study can be operated as baseline data for intervention programs that can overcome the moral distress of nurses taking care of COVID-19 patients.
Materials and methods
Design
A cross-sectional design was used in this study by using a questionnaire. This research was conducted for 4 months from June to September 2020.
Sample
Convenience sampling was used in the population of nurses handling the patients of COVID-19 working on the COVID-19 unit in four hospitals in the city of Makassar; those are Wahidin Sudiro Hospital, Sayang Rakyat Hospital, Unhas Hospital and Pelamonia Hospital. The data collection was conducted by using Google Forms. By inclusion criteria: Nurses who are in charge of handling COVID-19 at the hospital, are willing to participate in research, are working period ≥ 1 year. The survey was sent to 180 participants, but 128 people filled out the questionnaire (71.1%).
Instrument
The questionnaire consisted of a questionnaire of moral distress for clinical nurses and demographic data. Nurses’ moral distress was measured using a moral distress questionnaire for clinical nurses.15Cronchbach alpha value of 0.79; internal consistency: 0.804 consisting of 15 questions using the frequency level, namely as follows: 1 = never at all up to 6 = very often. The moral distress questionnaire for clinical nurses was back-translated, from Indonesian and English versions and vice versa has been affirmed to be the same. The questionnaire of demographic data includes questionnaire number, date of filling in the questionnaire, name, age, gender, length of work, last education, religion and marital status.
Data collection
Questionnaires were sent to the head of the room, then it will be distributed to all nurses in the room. The nurse fills out a questionnaire via a Google form sent via WhatsApp. After completing the questionnaire, the nurses submit it. Then, the data is automatically received by the researcher.
Ethical considerations
Before conducting the survey, ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Faculty of Universitas Hasanuddin, with an ethical number: 547/UN4.6.4.5.31/PP36/2020. Participants were asked to answer voluntarily and anonymously. Although informed consent was not obtained directly, a completed questionnaire was considered a form of consent.
Statistical analysis
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Version 17.0, was used to analyze the data. To assess the level of moral distress, individual analysis was performed for each of the 15 items on the study instrument. A mean score was calculated; higher mean scores indicated a greater frequency of moral distress. Subsequently, depending on the type of data (ordinal, nominal), a two-tailed t-test, Spearman correlation, or analysis of variance was performed to examine associations between the moral distress level and subjects’ characteristics.
Results
Demography characteristics
As shown in Table 1, the majority of the subjects were married (68%), Islam (92.2%) and females (78.1%). Most received their basic nursing education in baccalaureate or higher programs (55.5%) with an average age of 32.09 years. They worked as nurses for an average of 8.16 years.
Table 1.
Sample characteristics.
Sample characteristics | Response | Percent | Mean ± SD |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | |||
Male | 28 | 21.9 | |
Female | 100 | 78.1 | |
Religion | |||
Islam | 118 | 92.2 | |
Protestant | 10 | 7.8 | |
Education level | |||
Baccalaureate or higher | 71 | 55.5 | |
Diploma or associate | 57 | 44.5 | |
Marital status | |||
Single | 37 | 28.9 | |
Married | 87 | 68 | |
Widow/widower | 4 | 3.1 | |
Years as a nurse | 8.16±4.4 | ||
Age | 32.09±4.88 |
Mean levels of moral distress for subjects
The mean score of moral distress was 1.96, with a range of 1.33–2.59. The situation with the highest mean score was ‘I was obliged to respond to the patient, who deserved a treatment but did not get it’. Mean scores for the 15 situations are listed in Table 2. For the 15 items questions, the lowest mean scores were ‘I was forced to move a patient to an unsuitable department instead of providing her/him an appropriate treatment in my department’.
Table 2.
The items on the moral distress.
Items | Mean ± SD |
---|---|
I do not have enough time to provide the patient with the care she/he deserves | 1,81 ± 1,33 |
I was forced to provide care to the patient according to the supervising nurse directions against my professional opinion | 1,80 ± 1,14 |
I pondered whether to tell the patient (who did not have the means) that he can purchase an expensive medication not included in the‘‘medication basket’’ | 2,97 ± 1,61 |
I was forced to invade the patient’s privacy due to inadequate conditions (e.g., a patient in a corridor) | 1,28 ± 0,77 |
I was forced to provide care to the patient according to the physician’s directions against my professional opinion | 1,64 ± 0,96 |
I was forced to provide an incomplete treatment to the patient owing to work overload | 1,64 ± 1,04 |
I was forced to keep a patient, who needed a treatment, waiting, due to lack of time | 1,68 ± 1,04 |
I did not give the patient a sufficient attention due to lack of time | 1,64 ± 0,99 |
I was forced to treat the patient according to the physician’s directions against my conscience | 1,63 ± 1,03 |
I pondered what to do while witnessing deficient treatment provided by another nurse or a physician | 3,12 ± 1,52 |
I was forced to ignore the patient’s questions because the physician was supposed to address them | 2,02 ± 1,06 |
I was forced to ignore the patient’s family questions because the physician was supposed to address them | 1,97 ± 0,99 |
I was obliged to respond to the patient, who deserved a treatment but did not get it | 3,57 ± 1,64 |
I was forced to deny an appropriate treatment from a patient due to budget cuts | 1,34 ± 0,78 |
I was forced to move a patient to an unsuitable department instead of providing her/him an appropriate treatment in my department | 1,23 ± 0,65 |
Over all of moral distress | 1,96 ± 0,63 |
*Range 0-6 |
Level of moral distress based on characteristics
Table 3 shows the results of the analysis of samples’ characteristics and level of moral distress. There was a significant relationship between moral distress and education level (p < 0.05). Analyses (t-tests, Spearman correlation and analysis of variance) were performed to determine whether any other demographic data were responsible for the associations between each of these five variables and the level of moral distress. No other associations were identified. There was no significant correlation between gender, marital status, religion, subjects’ ages, experience as nurses.
Table 3.
Level of moral distress based on charactheristic.
Variables | Mean | R | P |
---|---|---|---|
Agea | −111 | 0,21 | |
Years as an a nursea | −160 | 0,07 | |
Marital statusb | 0,57 | ||
Genderc | 0,18 | ||
Male | 2,09 | ||
Female | 1,91 | ||
Religionc | 0,30 | ||
Islam | 1,97 | ||
Protestant | 1,75 | ||
Education levelc | 0,03 | ||
Baccalaureate or higher | 2,06 | ||
Diploma or associate | 1,82 |
Spearman.
Analysis of variance; post hoc (Scheffe) P < 0.05.
Two-tailed t test; P < 0.05.
Discussion
The overall frequency of moral distress
This study shows that moral distress can be concluded as a stress response developed when the nurses cannot follow moral values that are believed during caring for COVID-19 patients. In this study, the average score of moral distress of nurses handling the patients of COVID-19 showed a small to moderate scale. However, three categories show a high value which describes three types of moral distress. They are moral constraint distress, moral conflict distress, and moral uncertainty distress.
The first type, when the individual is constrained from doing what she/he thinks is the ethically appropriate action. Some nurses in this study were obliged to respond to the patient, who deserved a treatment but did not get it. In a pandemic situation, nurses fear to exposure the virus, they are not able to perform a physical examination in person, most of the patient care is provided through virtual technology, so they feel frustrated to adjust the new skills, moreover, it eliminates caring touch. This can affect feeling constrained and forced to present suboptimal care.16, 17 The second type occurs when two or more stakeholders take opposite opinions about how a moral dilemma should be handled, these conflicts can happen between patient and healthcare team or nurse and physician,3 this is felt by nurses in this research. They are pondered what to do while witnessing deficient treatment provided by another nurse or a physician.
In times of pandemics, it is often the case with nurses on whether there is sufficient personal protective equipment available, whether some respirators for those who need them and whether hospitals provide enough nurses to meet the needs of those affected by COVID-19. Nurses are problem solvers and innovators who demonstrate their skills to address these issues in their clinical practice. Nurses seek to find PPE and gather other supplies they need to meet the needs of their colleagues and patients. However, the constant challenge of maintaining the necessary resources to provide safe, high-quality nursing care can provoke moral conflict distress.18,19
The third type happens when a nurse or other healthcare professional is unconvinced regarding what is the morally right way to continue given the current condition, which can cause these individuals to feel torn, conflicted, frustrated, guilty and upset.3 In this study, almost all of the respondents pondered whether to tell the patient (who did not have the means) that he can purchase an expensive medication not included in the ‘medication basket’. This condition occurs in many places in Indonesia, in which not all residents get health insurance,20 especially in the lower economic class in a pandemic situation. Nurses experienced moral uncertainty as treatment options were restricted and unknown. Nurses did not understand if it was safe to give medications whose efficacy when used for COVID-19 was no evidence yet. What if the medication harms the patient? There was much uncertainty about what the correct treatment options were. When convalescent plasma and monoclonal antibodies became available, nurses were not sure if they worked for treating COVID-19 or for how long.21 This is also in accordance with the research of,17 which is nurses said that they have a lack of knowledge and uncertainty regarding how to treat a new illness.
Moral distress situations frequently occur in the process of providing care related to the relationship between nurses, patients, families and doctors. One of the triggers for high moral pressure is working in conditions of insecurity,22 such as during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this issue is critical to address. The institutions, where nurses work, are expected to provide supports to develop coping strategies in handling moral pressure; team support can reduce moral distress.23,24
Sample characteristics and moral distress
Previous research has shown there is no relationship between the characteristics of age, religion, marital status and education level.25 However, this study found there was a relationship between education level and moral distress. Nurses with a bachelor's degree have higher average moral distress scores than those with a diploma degree. Moral pressure and professional efficiency are positively correlated. Registered Nurses, possessing more authority than practical nurses, experience moral pressure more than practical nurses. Nurses with high professionalism can set high demands or goals, which can cause moral distress. Nurses with high professional effectiveness may be more morally sensitive, which also encourages moral pressure.6
Conclusion
Nurses handling the patients of COVID-19 experienced relatively low to moderate moral distress even though they encountered problematic and risky situations. This condition, nevertheless, requires attention, so that it does not occur in the future. For further studies, it is recommended to explore the factors affecting moral pressure specifically at risky conditions and interventions that can be done to overcome them.
Acknowledgements
This original research was performed at Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital, Sayang Rakyat Hospital, Pelamonia Hospital, and Hasanuddin University Hospital at Makassar Indonesia. The research is financed by the Faculty of Nursing Hasanuddin University.
Footnotes
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: This research was financed by the Faculty of Nursing Hasanuddin University, it has no interest in whatever directions the results are pointing to. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors.
ORCID iD: Akbar Harisa https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9938-8778
References
- 1.Corley MC. Nurse moral distress: a proposed theory and research agenda. Nurs Ethics 2002; 9: 636–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tschudin V. Ethics in nursing: the caring relationship, 3rd ed. London: Elsevier, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jameton A. Nursing practice: the ethical issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- 4.McCarthy J, Gastmans C. Moral distress: A review of the argument-based nursing ethics literature. Nurs Ethics 2015; 22: 131–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Burston AS, Tuckett AG. Moral distress in nursing: Contributing factors, outcome and interventions. Nurs Ethics 2012; 20: 312–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ohnishi K, Ohgushi Y, Nakano M, Fujii H, Tanaka H, Kitaoka K, Narita Y. Moral distress experienced by psychiatric nurses in Japan. Nurs Ethics 2010; 17: 726–739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Khan S, Siddique R, Li H, Ali A, Shereen MA, Bashir N, Xue M. Impact of coronavirus outbreak on psychological health. J Global Health 2020; 10: 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Robert R, Kentish-Barnes N, Boyer A, Laurent A, Azoulay E, Reignier J. Ethical dilemmas due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Intensive Care 2020; 10: 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jeffrey DI. Relational ethical approaches to the COVID-19 pandemic. J Med Ethics 2020; 0: 1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Meaney M. Moral distress: I just can’t take it anymore!. Case Manager 2002; 13: 32–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wright DK, Peterson W, Gifford W. Nurses ethical considerations during a pandemic. Canadian Nurses Association, 2020.
- 12.Kälvemark S, Höglund AT, Hansson MG, et al. Living with conflicts–ethical dilemmas and moral distress in the health care system. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 1075–1084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Menon V, Padhy SK. Ethical dilemmas faced by health care workers during COVID-19 pandemic: Issues, implications and suggestions. Asian J Psychiat 2020; 51: 102–116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ramos FR, Barth PO, Maria A, Schneider M, Cabral AS, Reinaldo S. Effects of moral distress on nurses : integrative Literature Review. Cogitare Enferm 2016; 21: 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Eizenberg MM, Desivilya HS, Hirschfeld MJ. Moral distress questionnaire for clinical nurses: instrument development. J Adv Nurs 2009; 65: 885–892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Morley G, Sese D, Rajendram P, Horshburgh CC. Addressing caregiver moral distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cleveland Clin J Med 2020: 1–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Silverman HJ, Kheirbek RE, Jackson GM, Day J. Moral distress in nurses caring for patients with COVID-19. Nurs Ethics 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cacchione PZ. Moral distress in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Nurs Res 2020; 29(4): 215–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Asghari F, Tehrani SS. Ethical issues in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic; a narrative review. Adv J Emerg Med 2020; 4: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wiseman V, Thabrany H, Asante A, Haemmerli M, Kosen S, Gilson L, Mills A, Hayen A, Tangcharoensathien V, Patcharanarumol W. An evaluation of health systems equity in Indonesia: study protocol. Int J Equity Health 2018; 17: 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Godshall M. Coping with moral distress during COVID-19. Nursing 2021; 51: 55–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cavaliere TA, Daly B, Dowling D, Montgomery K. Moral distress in neonatal intensive care unit RNs. Adv Neonat Care 2010; 10: 145–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Oh Y, Gastmans C. Moral distress experienced by nurses: A quantitative literature review. Nurs Ethics 2015; 22: 15–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kramer JB, Brown DE, Kopar PK. Ethics in the time of coronavirus: Recommendations in the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am College Surgeons 2020; 230: 1114–1118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.DeVeer AJE, Francke AL, Struijs A, Willems DL. Determinants of moral distress in daily nursing practice: A cross sectional correlational questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Studies 2013; 50: 100–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]