Skip to main content
JCO Global Oncology logoLink to JCO Global Oncology
. 2022 May 5;8(Suppl 1):47. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.53000

Serious Illness Communication in Cancer Care in Africa: A Scoping Review of Empirical Research

Chiara A Wabl 1, Raymond Athanas 2, Vincent Cubaka 3, Beatrice Mushi 2, Mamsau Ngoma 4, Nicaise Nsabimana 3, Godfrey Sama 2, Hubert Tuyishime 5, Pacifique Uwamahoro 3, Justin J Sanders 6, Rebecca L Sudore 1, Katherine Van Loon 1, Evans Whitaker 1, Rebecca J DeBoer 1
PMCID: PMC9906545

PURPOSE

Serious illness communication (SIC) in cancer care describes conversations between clinicians, patients, and families about prognosis and treatment decisions. Cultural context influences SIC. Researchers have studied SIC across diverse settings in Africa. We aimed to describe and synthesize the heterogeneous body of research on SIC practices, preferences, and needs in Africa to identify research and training priorities.

METHODS

Our search strategy identified studies that focused on SIC within cancer or palliative care in Africa. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, African Index Medicus, and PsycINFO, yielding 1811 unique titles. After sequential review of abstracts, full text, and cited references, 42 articles met inclusion criteria. Quantitative and qualitative data describing study characteristics, aims, methods, and findings were abstracted and analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Critical appraisal was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

The 42 included articles were published from 1997-2021, half since 2017, representing 16 countries and all African Union regions: West (33%), East (29%), South (21%), North (12%), and Central (5%). Most study designs were qualitative (45%) or quantitative surveys (50%). Study participants included patients (35%), family caregivers (18%), doctors (18%), nurses (12%), and/or other (11%). Study aims focused on disclosure of diagnosis (27%) or prognosis (20%), breaking bad news (15%), general patient-clinician communication (12%), truth-telling (8%), shared decision-making (7%), information needs/preferences (5%), and/or advance care planning (5%). Despite diverse contexts, common themes emerged. Study authors frequently recommended communication skills training. Critical appraisal demonstrated high quality of studies overall.

CONCLUSION

Research on SIC in Africa has increased in recent years. Most studies have focused on information delivery by clinicians; fewer on eliciting information from patients (eg, shared decision-making, advanced care planning). Significant opportunities exist for further study and for communication skills training.

Vincent Cubaka

Research Funding: Johnson & Johnson

Beatrice Mushi

Research Funding: Boston Scientific Company; Celgene Cancer Care Links

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/go/authors/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

Vincent Cubaka

Research Funding: Johnson & Johnson

Beatrice Mushi

Research Funding: Boston Scientific Company; Celgene Cancer Care Links

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.


Articles from JCO Global Oncology are provided here courtesy of American Society of Clinical Oncology

RESOURCES