Significance
Primary liver cancer is currently the sixth most common cancer and fourth leading cause of cancer-related death globally. The limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis of patients with primary liver cancer highlight the significance of developing cancer prevention strategies. Our findings identified a mechanism of gut flora disequilibrium-promoted liver cancer initiation via a tryptophan metabolism-balanced AhR-SREBP2 axis between the gut and liver. Our results might contribute to developing strategies for liver cancer prevention through gut flora manipulation.
Keywords: gut microbiota, liver tumorigenesis, SREBP2, tryptophan metabolism, AhR
Abstract
The gut microbiota and liver cancer have a complex interaction. However, the role of gut microbiome in liver tumor initiation remains unknown. Herein, liver cancer was induced using hydrodynamic transfection of oncogenes to explore liver tumorigenesis in mice. Gut microbiota depletion promoted liver tumorigenesis but not progression. Elevated sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 (SREBP2) was observed in mice with gut flora disequilibrium. Pharmacological inhibition of SREBP2 or Srebf2 RNA interference attenuated mouse liver cancer initiation under gut flora disequilibrium. Furthermore, gut microbiota depletion impaired gut tryptophan metabolism to activate aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). AhR agonist Ficz inhibited SREBP2 posttranslationally and reversed the tumorigenesis in mice. And, AhR knockout mice recapitulated the accelerated liver tumorigenesis. Supplementation with Lactobacillus reuteri, which produces tryptophan metabolites, inhibited SREBP2 expression and tumorigenesis in mice with gut flora disequilibrium. Thus, gut flora disequilibrium promotes liver cancer initiation by modulating tryptophan metabolism and up-regulating SREBP2.
Primary liver cancer is currently the sixth most common cancer and fourth leading cause of cancer-related death globally (1). The well-established risk factors include chronic hepatitis C virus or hepatitis B virus infection, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), alcohol consumption, and diabetes. As one of the hallmarks of cancer (2), the gut microbiota has been widely recognized to play a key role in liver cancer (3). Most studies focused on the relationship between the gut microbiota and liver cancer development. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is one of the most studied bacterial components, and its receptor, toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), was reported to be required for liver tumor promotion, but not for liver tumor initiation (4). It has been reported that secondary bile acid, a microbiome-derived metabolite, is critical in mediating host immunity in tumor progression. And, gut sterilization effectively attenuates liver tumor progression (5). In nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the gut microbiota promotes HCC progression via suppression of antitumor immunity (6). However, there is little evidence for the role of gut commensal bacteria in liver tumor initiation.
The crosstalk between liver and gut regulates metabolism and immune functions mutually. Increasing evidence indicates that gut commensal bacteria play an important role in liver tumor progression by regulating host antitumor immunity (7). More importantly, the gut microbiota influences liver metabolism via its metabolites. Among them, cholesterol metabolism is regulated by the gut microbiota (8, 9), and its homeostasis is inextricably bound with liver cancer (3). The mevalonate pathway has been reported to be integral to tumor initiation and progression (10). In liver cancer, p53 blocks the activation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 (SREBP2), the master transcriptional regulator of the mevalonate pathway, to suppress tumorigenesis (11). Moreover, dietary cholesterol drives NAFLD–HCC formation by inducing alteration of the gut microbiota and metabolites in mice (12). However, it remains unclear whether aberrant cholesterol metabolism induced by gut flora disequilibrium affects liver tumorigenesis and the underlying mechanism.
In the present study, using the hydrodynamic transfection-induced liver cancer model (13), we found that gut flora disequilibrium induced by antibiotics dramatically promoted the initiation of liver cancer and liver cholesterol synthesis. Gut flora disequilibrium-induced liver cholesterol metabolism was relevant to tryptophan metabolites in the gut, as well as the activation of their receptor, aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), in the liver. Therefore, the present study was performed to determine the role and the associated molecular mechanisms of gut flora disequilibrium in the initiation of liver cancer.
Results
Gut Flora Disequilibrium Promoted Liver Tumor Initiation in Mice.
To determine the role of gut commensal bacteria in liver tumor initiation, mice were administered with an antibiotic cocktail (ABX) (vancomycin, neomycin, and ampicillin) in drinking water to deplete the gut commensal bacteria. We first examined changes in fecal bacterial community by 16S rRNA sequencing after 14 d of ABX treatment ( SI Appendix, Fig. S1A ). At the phylum level, the relative abundances of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes significantly decreased, with Proteobacteria accounting for the vast majority of total bacteria following ABX treatment ( SI Appendix, Fig. S1B ). The Lactobacillus genus represented the second largest proportion of the bacteria (23.5%) in normal mice, which was significantly reduced in ABX-treated mice. And, Lactobacillus intestinalis represented the significantly reduced species of Lactobacillus between the control and ABX groups ( SI Appendix, Fig. S1 C and D ). The hydrodynamic tail vein injection (HTVi)-induced HCC model was constructed by cotransfection of two oncogenes, human c-Myc and n-RAS (Ras/Myc), which was performed at 2 wk after ABX treatment, and mice were killed for phenotypic analysis at 6 wk (Fig. 1A ). The tumor burden was assessed by analysis of liver weight/body weight (LW/BW) ratios, tumor number, and spleen weight/body weight (SW/BW) ratios, as well as histological staining of hematoxylin–eosin H&E and Ki67. ABX treatment significantly accelerated Ras/Myc-induced liver tumor initiation when the tumor nodules developed for 4 wk (Fig. 1 B and C ), or as short as 2 and 3 wk ( SI Appendix, Fig. S2 A–D , respectively). Mouse survival analysis showed that ABX-treated mice had a significantly shorter mean survival time compared with that of the control mice after tumor initiation by Ras/Myc transfection (Fig. 1D ). We also tested whether short-term gut microbiome depletion caused a difference in tumor initiation. The result revealed a similar effect if ABX treatment was stopped early (1 wk after HTVi) ( SI Appendix, Fig. S2 E–G ). To further confirm this phenotype, other liver tumor models were also applied. The mice were transfected with human c-Met and human β-Catenin oncogenes after 2 wk of gut microbiome depletion and killed at 6 wk (Fig. 1E ). The same effect of ABX treatment was observed upon macroscopic and histological examination. Increased LW/BW ratios, tumor number, and SW/BW ratios were also observed in the ABX-treated mice (Fig. 1 F and G ). To exclude the effect of ABX treatment-induced low LW/BW ratio (92.97% of that in the control mice) in tumor initiation ( SI Appendix, Fig. S2H ), ABX-treated mice were given 90% of the volume of that given to the control mice by HTVi, and significantly increased tumor burdens were still observed in mice with gut microbiome depletion ( SI Appendix, Fig. S2 I and J ). We further established the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) model by cotransfection of two oncogenes, human Yes-Associated Protein (YAP) and the serine/threonine kinase AKT (YAP/AKT), to investigate whether gut microbiome also affected the initiation of ICC ( SI Appendix, Fig. S3A ). Consistent with mouse models of HCC, ABX treatment also significantly accelerated the initiation of ICC compared to that in control mice ( SI Appendix, Fig. S3 B and C ).
To further assess the role of the gut microbiome in liver tumor initiation, germ-free (GF) mice were used to make the gut microbiota fully depleted. HTVi (Ras/Myc) was performed in GF and normal specified-pathogen-free (SPF) mice, which were killed at 8 wk ( SI Appendix, Fig. S4A ). Consistent with ABX treatment, the GF mice exhibited significantly faster tumor formation with increased LW/BW ratios, tumor number, and SW/BW ratios, compared with those in the SPF mice ( SI Appendix, Fig. S4 B and C ). Furthermore, we performed fecal microbiome transplantation (FMT) to investigate whether the fecal microbiome from normal SPF mice could slow down liver tumor initiation in GF mice (Fig.1H ). 16S rRNA sequencing and restored cecum size confirmed that fecal microbiome from SPF mice was successfully colonized in GF + FMT mice ( SI Appendix, Fig. S4 D–G ). The increased tumor formation in the GF mice was inhibited by FMT, including a reduced LW/BW ratio, reduced tumor number, and a decreased SW/BW ratio (Fig. 1 I and J ). Taken together, these findings suggested that the gut commensal microbiota inhibited liver tumor initiation in mice.
Gut Flora Disequilibrium Failed to Affect Tumor Progression and Metastasis in Mice.
Increasing evidence points toward a key role of the bacterial microbiome in promoting the development of HCC (3). Therefore, we used the HTVi-induced liver cancer model to explore the role of gut commensal bacteria in liver tumor progression. ABX treatment was given 2 wk after HTVi (Ras/Myc) when there were macroscopic minimal tumors on the liver surface, and the mice were killed 6 wk after HTVi (Fig. 2A ). The result showed that after tumor initiation, instead of tumor promotion, gut commensal bacteria depletion in mice induced a slight decrease in tumor number (P = 0.043) and a decreasing trend of the LW/BW ratio (P = 0.081) and SW/BW ratio (P = 0.100) (Fig. 2 B and C ). We also explored the effect of gut flora disequilibrium in liver cancer metastasis and other type of metastatic cancer in the liver. We used the subcutaneously implanted tumor model (Hep1-6, a mouse HCC cell line) (Fig. 2D ) and found no differences in tumor weight and tumor volume between ABX-treated mice and control mice (Fig. 2 E and F ). To establish the liver metastasis model, intrasplenic injection of KrasLSL-G12D, Trp53LSL-R172H, Pdx1-Cre (KPC) pancreatic tumor cells was performed (Fig. 2G ), and there was no difference in liver metastasis between ABX-treated mice and control mice (Fig. 2 H and I ). The same result was also found in liver cancer lung metastasis induced by peripheral injection of Hep1-6 cells (Fig. 2 J–L ). In summary, in contrast to liver cancer initiation, gut flora disequilibrium failed to affect tumor progression and metastasis in mice.
Gut Flora Disequilibrium Led to Increased SREBP2 and Downstream Cholesterol Synthesis-Related Gene Expression in the Liver.
The divergent roles of gut commensal bacteria in liver cancer initiation and progression prompted us to explore the key driving genes in tumor initiation in the liver. Liver tissues from ABX-treated mice and control mice were isolated (Fig. 3A ) and transcriptome analysis was performed. We identified 114 up-regulated genes and 114 down-regulated genes in livers of mice with ABX treatment compared to control mice (Fig. 3B ). Gene Ontology-Biological Process analysis revealed enrichment of processes related to cholesterol metabolism (Fig. 3C ). Pathway enrichment analysis in the Reactome database also revealed that “metabolism of steroids” and “cholesterol biosynthesis” pathways were up-regulated in mice with gut commensal bacteria depletion (Fig. 3D ). Indeed, from the transcriptome analysis, the expression levels of many genes involved in cholesterol biosynthesis were up-regulated in the liver after ABX treatment (Fig. 3E ). Then, real-time qRT-PCR and Western blotting were performed to validate some of the key cholesterol biosynthesis-related genes and proteins, respectively, which were mostly up-regulated in livers of ABX-treated mice (Fig. 3 F and G ), which was also consistent with their expression in the liver of GF mice ( SI Appendix, Fig. S5 A and B ). Among them, the transcription factor SREBP2 (encoded by Srebf2) is known to be critical to control the expression of many downstream cholesterol biosynthesis-related genes. However, the mRNA expression of Srebf2 did not change in the liver of mice with ABX treatment or in the GF mice (Fig. 3F and SI Appendix, Fig. S5A ).
We then validated whether SREBP2 was up-regulated at the protein level in the liver in mice with ABX depletion and in the GF mice. The protein levels of both the precursor form of SREBP2 (p-SREBP2) and nuclear form of SREBP2 (n-SREBP2) were dramatically elevated in the livers of ABX-treated mice (Fig. 3G ). The same results were observed in GF mice ( SI Appendix, Fig. S5B ). Moreover, cholesterol and triglycerides (TG) were measured in serum and liver samples. The concentrations of cholesterol were significantly elevated in the serum and liver of mice treated with ABX, and the concentrations of TG showed no significant differences between the two groups (Fig. 3H ). Moreover, the liver function measurements revealed that ABX treatment had no toxic effect on the mouse liver (Fig. 3I ). Taken together, gut flora disequilibrium led to increased SREBP2 and cholesterol synthesis-related gene expression in the liver, which supposed to be the key factor promoting liver cancer initiation.
Elevated Liver SREBP2 Promoted Liver Tumorigenesis in Mice with Gut Flora Disequilibrium.
We then tried to address whether the enhanced cholesterol anabolism plays the pivotal role in liver tumor initiation. Studies on the influence of cholesterol metabolism in cancer progression highlighted the important effects of cholesterol metabolites on the tumor immune microenvironment (14). However, in our study, flow cytometry analysis showed that there were no significantly differences in the infiltration of various immune cells either in the liver or spleen of mice treated with ABX ( SI Appendix, Fig. S6A ). We also assessed liver tumor initiation in immunodeficient mice treated with ABX. The phenotypic analysis showed that in nude mice, gut flora disequilibrium induced by ABX treatment could also promote HTVi (Ras/Myc)-induced liver cancer formation ( SI Appendix, Fig. S6 B and C ). And, due to the elevated cholesterol level in the serum and liver in the ABX-treated mice, we explored whether the increased cholesterol accelerated tumor initiation directly. Mice received a high cholesterol diet (HCD, 2% cholesterol) for 2 wk before HTVi (Ras/Myc) ( SI Appendix, Fig. S6D ) to elevate the cholesterol level in the blood and liver ( SI Appendix, Fig. S6E ). The result showed that mice fed with the HCD did not exhibit an increased tumor burden compared with that in control diet-fed mice ( SI Appendix, Fig. S6 F and G ). Therefore, we concluded that the change in the cholesterol level was not the key mechanism that drives liver tumor initiation in mice with gut flora disequilibrium.
In tumor initiation, SREBP2 has been reported to act as a potential oncogene in some types of tumors (11, 15, 16). Therefore, we investigated whether increased liver SREBP2 is responsible for the accelerated tumor initiation in mice with gut microbiome depletion. Betulin, an SREBP inhibitor that blocks the SREBP cleavage-activating protein/SREBP pathway, was administered to mice treated with H2O or ABX (Fig. 4A ). The validation experiment showed that the hepatic n-SREBP2 level was effectively inhibited by 14 d of betulin treatment in ABX-treated mice (Fig. 4B ). Betulin treatment failed to reduce the tumor loads in the control mice, but led to a significantly reduced tumor burden in the mice fed with ABX (Fig. 4 C and D ). We then used adeno-associated virus 8 (AAV8) encoding Srebf2-RNA interference (AAV8-Srebf2 KD) to knock down liver Srebf2 expression. Mice were injected with AAV8-Srebf2 KD or AAV8-EGFP (AAV8-Vector, as a control), and HTVi (Ras/Myc) was performed 4 wk later (Fig. 4E ). Validation experiments showed that injection of AAV8-Srebf2 KD significantly decreased Srebf2 expression ( SI Appendix, Fig. S7A ), and both p-SREBP2 and n-SREBP2 levels were reduced significantly in ABX-treated mice (Fig. 4F ). The phenotype showed that liver Srebf2 knockdown recapitulated the rescue effect of betulin treatment that significantly inhibited tumorigenesis in mice treated with ABX (Fig. 4 G and H ). By contrast, we also injected AAV8 expressing Srebf2 (AAV8-Srebf2 OE) to overexpress liver SREBP2 in normal mice, and HTVi (Ras/Myc) was performed 4 wk later (Fig. 4I ). Validation experiments showed significantly increased Srebf2 expression ( SI Appendix, Fig. S7B ) and the levels of both p-SREBP2 and n-SREBP2 in mice with AAV8-Srebf2 OE injection (Fig. 4J ). Compared with control mice, SREBP2 overexpression in the liver significantly increased the tumor burden (Fig. 4 K and L ). Thus, we concluded that gut flora disequilibrium-induced SREBP2 overexpression in the liver directly promoted liver tumor initiation.
Gut Flora Disequilibrium Decreased Microbiota-Derived AhR Ligands to Promote Liver Tumorigenesis in Mice.
Next, we tried to explore the relationship between gut flora disequilibrium and SREBP2-regulated cholesterol synthesis change in the liver. Tryptophan metabolism in the gut microbiota and the sensor of tryptophan metabolites AhR have been widely studied as an important bridge connecting gut flora disequilibrium and liver disease (17). In general, gut tryptophan can be metabolized by tryptophanase positive bacteria, especially Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus, to indole and further into more derivatives, such as indole-3-acetic-acid (IAA), which are ligands for AhR (18). Considering the changed composition of the gut flora caused by ABX treatment, we first explored the effect of gut commensal bacteria depletion on AhR ligands in the gut. Thus, we examined tryptophan and its metabolites using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and 23 metabolites were detected in mouse feces, including an absence of 5-Hydroxytryptophan, indole-3-β-acrylic acid, and tryptamine (below 1 ng/g) in the ABX-treated mice (Fig. 5 A and B ). Indeed, the levels of 10 tryptophan metabolites decreased significantly in the ABX-treated mice, including AhR ligands of IAA, indole-3-carbaldehyde (ICAld), and indole-3-propionic acid (Fig. 5C ).
AhR has been reported to regulate cholesterol biosynthesis in a dioxin-response element-independent manner and SREBP2 in the liver (19, 20). Therefore, we speculated that depletion of gut commensal bacteria-decreased AhR ligands would affect the SREBP2 level in the liver. To test this hypothesis, the AhR agonist, 6-formylindolo (3,2-b) carbazole (Ficz), was administered to ABX-treated mice and control mice (Fig. 5D ). The expression of cytochrome p450 family 1 subfamily a member 1 (Cyp1a1), the target gene of AhR, was significantly decreased in ABX-treated mice compared to that in control mice, which was also decreased in GF mice compared to that in SPF mice, suggesting an impaired AhR activity in mice with gut flora disequilibrium (Fig. 5E and SI Appendix, Fig. S8A ). And, Cyp1a1 was significantly elevated after Ficz treatment in both control and ABX groups (Fig. 5E ). Notably, the Cyp1a1 level was lower in the ABX-treated mice compared with that in the control mice under the same treatment by Ficz. Western blotting results showed that administration of Ficz reduced protein level of both p-SREBP2 and n-SREBP2 significantly, accompanied by a decreased expression of downstream 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR), the rate-limiting enzyme of cholesterol biosynthesis in ABX-treated mice, but not in the control mice (Fig. 5F ). Phenotypic analysis showed that the administration of Ficz inhibited tumor burdens significantly in ABX-treated mice, but not in the control mice (Fig. 5 G and H ). We further administrated Ficz in mice transfected with AAV8-Srebf2 OE to verify this hypothesis. Remarkably, Ficz-induced Cyp1a1 overexpression in the liver of control mice was significantly higher than that in mice with SREBP2 overexpression, and the protein level of SREBP2 was significantly decreased by Ficz treatment under SREBP2 overexpression condition ( SI Appendix, Fig. S8 B–D ). Thus, we concluded that decreased tryptophan metabolism-derived AhR ligands in mice with gut flora disequilibrium attenuated AhR activation, which finally up-regulated SREBP2 to promote tumor initiation in the liver.
Then, we used AhR knockout (Ahr −/−) mice to further confirm whether impaired AhR activation directly elevated SREBP2 in mice with gut flora disequilibrium. Both p-SREBP2 and n-SREBP2 levels were elevated significantly in the Ahr −/− mice compared with those in the control mice, accompanied by elevated expression of downstream HMGCR (Fig. 6A ). Next, we performed HTVi (Ras/Myc) in Ahr −/− and control mice, and the mice were killed 24 d after HTVi for phenotypic analysis. Ahr −/− mice exhibited a significantly increased tumor burden compared with that of the control mice (Fig. 6 B and C ). We next administered Ficz to Ahr −/− mice treated with ABX (Ahr −/−-ABX) and control mice treated with ABX (WT-ABX) to further confirm that the effect of Ficz on inhibiting SREBP2 and tumorigenesis could be attributed to AhR activation, rather than other effects of Ficz (Fig. 6D ). Consistent with our previous observation, both p-SREBP2 and n-SREBP2 levels were repressed by Ficz in WT-ABX mice, accompanied by a decreased expression of HMGCR, while in the Ahr −/−-ABX mice, Ficz failed to inhibit liver SREBP2 and downstream HMGCR expression (Fig. 6E ). Phenotypic analysis also confirmed that Ficz failed to decrease the tumor burden in Ahr −/−-ABX mice (Fig. 6 F and G ). Overall, these results further confirmed that AhR inhibited liver SREBP2 levels and attenuated tumorigenesis in mice.
Treatment with Lactobacillus Reuteri Attenuated Liver Tumor Initiation in Mice with Gut Flora Disequilibrium.
Next, we investigated whether supplementation of tryptophanase-positive bacteria could reduce liver SREBP2 and tumor initiation in mice with gut flora disequilibrium. According to our 16S rRNA sequencing results, Lactobacillus represented the second largest proportion of the bacteria that were significantly reduced in ABX-treated mice ( SI Appendix, Fig. S1C ). And, it has been reported that L. reuteri has strong ability to metabolize tryptophan and exhibits high AhR ligand production (17, 21). Therefore, L. reuteri bacteria or lactic acid bacterial culture (MRS) medium was administrated every other day after ABX cocktail treatment for 13 d, and 1 d later, HTVi (Ras/Myc) was performed (Fig. 7A ). The feces of each group were collected before HTVi, and fecal tryptophan and its metabolites were detected using LC-MS/MS analysis. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that administration of L. reuteri in mice with gut flora disequilibrium produced similar tryptophan metabolites compared with those in the control mice (Fig. 7B ). All the detected tryptophan metabolites were identified and six metabolites increased significantly after administration of L. reuteri in mice with gut flora disequilibrium, among which IAA and ICAld were ligands for AhR (Fig. 7 C and D ). In the liver, administration of L. reuteri significantly reduced the protein levels of both p-SREBP2 and n-SREBP2 in mice with gut flora disequilibrium (Fig. 7E ). Mice were killed 4 wk after HTVi (Ras/Myc), and phenotypic analysis showed that administration of L. reuteri significantly attenuated tumor formation in mice with gut flora disequilibrium (Fig. 7F ). In mice with gut flora disequilibrium, tumor burdens were significantly reduced after L. reuteri supplementation (Fig. 7G ). We further administered L. reuteri to Ahr −/−-ABX and WT-ABX mice to confirm that the effect of L. reuteri on inhibiting SREBP2 and tumorigenesis was attributed to AhR activation. In Ahr −/−-ABX mice, L. reuteri failed to inhibit liver SREBP2 expression and tumor initiation ( SI Appendix, Fig. S9 A–D ). Overall, these results suggested that supplementation with L. reuteri increased microbiota-derived AhR ligands, which was similar to the effect of Ficz treatment, i.e., it decreased SREBP2 and tumor initiation in mice with gut flora disequilibrium.
Insufficient Fecal IAA Level Was Accompanied with Tumorous Reduced AhR Activity and Increased SREBP2 Expression in Patients with HCC.
We next investigated the relevance of these findings in human disease; the fecal samples of HCC patients and healthy subjects were used for detecting tryptophan metabolites and microbiome 16S rRNA sequencing. Five tryptophan metabolites were changed significantly in HCC patients compared to those in healthy subjects, among which IAA and ICAld were AhR ligands. The level of IAA was decreased and the level of ICAld was increased in HCC patients. Notably, the average concentrations of IAA in healthy subjects vs. HCC patients were 2022.34 ng/g vs. 1124.50 ng/g, and the average concentrations of ICAld in healthy subjects vs. HCC patients were 66.43 ng/g vs. 128.50 ng/g, which was much lower than that of IAA ( SI Appendix, Fig. S10 A and B ). Besides, it has been reported that IAA is the dominant AhR activator but not ICAld in mice and humans (22). 16S rRNA sequencing showed that at phylum level, the relative abundance of Firmicutes was decreased and Proteobacteria was increased in HCC patients compared to that in healthy subjects. At genus level, the Blautia genus represented the significantly decreased genus in HCC group ( SI Appendix, Fig. S10 C and D ). We further examined the Cyp1a1 expression in HCC tissues and matched adjacent nontumor tissues, and the results showed that Cyp1a1 was significantly decreased in HCC tissues ( SI Appendix, Fig. S10E ). We also observed a positive correlation between fecal IAA level and Cyp1a1 expression in patients with HCC ( SI Appendix, Fig. S10F ). And, increased SREBP2 expression was observed in HCC tissues compared to that in matched adjacent nontumor tissues ( SI Appendix, Fig. S10G ). Overall, these results showed that in HCC patients, reduced fecal IAA was correlated with impaired AhR activation and increased SREBP2 expression in HCC tissues.
Discussion
Liver cancer is one of the most common primary tumors worldwide, with increasing rates of morbidity and mortality (23). An increasing body of evidence shows that liver cancer is associated with changes in gut microbiota abundance, composition, and barrier function, which are related to the participation of metabolites from microbes in gut (24). In this study, we found that a balanced gut microbiota played an important role in preventing liver tumor initiation. Specifically, gut flora disequilibrium induced using antibiotics or using GF mice elevated SREBP2 levels in the liver, which accelerated liver tumor initiation. More importantly, we found that microbiota-derived AhR ligands were markedly decreased in mice with gut flora disequilibrium. Moreover, Ahr −/− mice showed up-regulated SREBP2 levels in the liver and showed enhanced liver tumor initiation. Furthermore, we used Ficz to directly activate AhR or the bacteria L. reuteri, which increased intestinal AhR ligands to activate AhR, which both reversed the abnormal liver SREBP2 elevation and inhibited liver tumorigenesis in mice with gut flora disequilibrium ( SI Appendix, Fig. S11).
Studies have revealed the crucial influence of the gut microbiome in liver cancer. It was reported that gut microbiome-derived LPS is required for liver tumor promotion, which depended on a TLR4-mediated increase in proliferation, the expression of the hepatomitogen, epiregulin, and prevention of apoptosis in liver cells (4). In addition, gut microbiome-mediated primary-to-secondary bile acid conversion controlled natural killer T (NKT) cell accumulation by CXCL16 expression and protected against liver tumor progression (5). These studies demonstrated that depletion of the gut microbiome inhibited liver tumor progression, which, however, played an opposite role in tumor initiation in our study. By using hydrodynamic transfection-induced liver cancer models, we explored the roles of the gut microbiome in both liver tumor initiation and progression. After liver tumors were developed, depletion of gut microbiome did not accelerate or inhibit liver cancer in mice, suggesting the different mechanisms by which gut microbiota affects tumor initiation and development. In diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced liver cancer in rats, induction of enteric dysbacteriosis or intestinal inflammation by penicillin promoted tumor formation, which was associated with the translocation of endotoxin and activation of damage-associated molecular patterns (25). In other types of cancer, the relationship between the gut microbiota and tumor initiation has rarely been studied. In the initiation of colitis-associated cancer, the gut microbiota facilitates tumorigenesis by generating a precancerous inflammatory milieu (26). In melanoma, it was reported that antibiotic-induced gut microbiota disequilibrium also promoted tumor initiation by affecting antigen-presenting cell development in mice (27).
Recent studies have revealed the effect of gut microbiome in regulating cholesterol synthesis in the liver, which directly affects liver homeostasis and causes liver disease (9, 28). In this study, we detected the abnormal activation of the mevalonate pathway in the liver with gut flora disequilibrium, and the expression of SREBP2 was responsible for promoting liver tumor initiation. A previous study demonstrated that loss of p53 induced liver tumorigenesis via activation of SREBP2 and the mevalonate pathway (11). Several studies also revealed that SREBP2 is aberrantly activated in other types of cancers, including melanoma, prostate cancer, and colorectal cancer (29 –31). In melanoma, SREBP2-driven iron homeostatic pathways, which include transcription of the iron carrier transferrin to reduce intracellular iron pools, reactive oxygen species, and lipid peroxidation, contribute to cancer progression, drug resistance, and metastasis (31). In our study, gut flora disequilibrium-induced liver SREBP2 overexpression was accompanied by enhanced cholesterol synthesis, which, however, does not seem to participate directly in liver tumor initiation, as assessed using an oral cholesterol test. In more detail, the transcriptional level of Srebf2 was unchanged; however, the levels of p-SREBP2 and n-SREBP2 were elevated significantly, suggesting that SREBP2 was posttranslationally modified to directly regulate liver tumorigenesis. Therefore, the underlying mechanisms by which elevated SREBP2 promotes liver tumorigenesis remain to be further elucidated.
This study addressed the importance of microbiota-derived tryptophan metabolites and AhR activation in modulating liver tumorigenesis. Tryptophan metabolism has been strongly linked to cancer pathogenesis, and most of the studies revealed that tryptophan metabolites are accumulated by the overexpression of tryptophan-degrading enzymes, including indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), in tumor cells, leading to suppression of the tumor immune response (32, 33). Few studies have focused on the effect of tryptophan metabolism associated with the microbiota in cancers. In colorectal cancer, alteration of fecal tryptophan metabolism mediated by the microbiota is associated with intestinal barrier function and is involved in its pathogenesis, which might be exploited to develop novel therapeutic approaches (34, 35). In the gut, tryptophan is metabolized by gut bacteria, especially E. coli and Lactobacillus, which express tryptophanase to produce indole and its derivatives, which are the most important endogenous AhR ligands (17, 21). One of the tryptophan metabolites, IAA, was reported to have protective effects on DEN-induced liver tumorigenesis (36). AhR has been reported to function as a tumor suppressor by regulating cell proliferation, DNA damage, and inflammatory cytokine expression (37). Conversely, Hezaveh et al. proved a tumor-promotive function of microbial-derived AhR signaling in the progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (38). These evidences suggested the complex functions of AhR signaling in different tumor types and different tumor stages. In our study, gut flora disequilibrium led to inhibited AhR function, which could be reactivated by supplementation with L. reuteri, by increasing AhR ligands, or by the AhR agonist Ficz, making it clinically possible to prevent liver tumor initiation through AhR activation.
We found that the fecal IAA was insufficient in HCC patients and further confirmed that the AhR activation was impaired in HCC tissues. The proportion of potentially pathogenic bacteria Proteobacteria which has been proposed to be a hallmark of gut flora disequilibrium was significantly increased in HCC patients (39). Meanwhile, the proportion of Firmicutes which contains most of the probiotic bacteria was significantly decreased in HCC patients. And, the reduced IAA was most likely due to the altered intestinal microbiota in HCC patients. However, the gut microbiota composition was quite different between humans and mice; for example, the proportion of Lactobacillus in healthy humans is much less than that in SPF mice (0.19% vs. 23.5%) and the proportion of Blautia in healthy humans is much more than that in SPF mice (8.14% vs. 0.09%). We found that the proportion of Lactobacillus showed no significant difference between HCC patients and healthy subjects, while the proportion of Blautia was significantly decreased in HCC patients. A previous study suggested that Blautia was able to metabolize tryptophan, and we speculated that reduced proportion of Blautia in HCC patients led to reduced IAA and AhR activation (40). This suggested that the species of gut microflora that are responsible for metabolism of tryptophan in mice may differ substantially from that in humans. Moreover, it is difficult to obtain the human samples during the initiation of HCC; considering the different roles of gut flora in liver tumor initiation and progression, these results from human subjects should be interpreted with caution.
This study revealed the inhibitory effect of AhR on SREBP2 in liver cancer. However, the underlying mechanism remains obscure. Only one previous study proved that in vitro, AhR is an adaptor protein of the ubiquitin ligase complex and can degrade SREBP2 through the ubiquitin–proteasomal pathway in a calcium-dependent manner (19). In our study, we found that AhR activation strongly decreased both p-SREBP2 and n-SREBP2; however, it did not affect the mRNA level of Srebf2 (Fig. 5E ), suggesting that AhR inhibits SREBP2 function by posttranslational modification. In addition, AhR activation by Ficz significantly inhibited SREBP2, accompanied by downstream expression of HMGCR, but not in the control mice (Fig. 5F ), suggesting that AhR activation might function only when SREBP2 is abnormally overexpressed. Indeed, once SREBP2 was overexpressed, AhR activation by Ficz showed increased SREBP2 inhibitory activity ( SI Appendix, Fig. S8 ). Therefore, the underlying mechanism of AhR-SREBP2 signaling pathway requires further study.
In recent years, FMT-based microbiological therapy has become a hot spot of cancer research, which also has led to the development of preclinical and clinical manipulations in cancer management (41). In a clinical study, FMT was proven to promote an antitumor response in patients with immunotherapy-refractory melanoma (42). Increasing evidence indicates the potential therapeutic value of FMT in liver cancer (43). However, the “healthy” microbiome is hard to define well from the gut microbiota community. Among them, Lactobacillus is one of the bacterial genera that has valuable probiotic properties. Here, we identified that FMT with L. reuteri decelerated liver cancer initiation in mice with gut flora disequilibrium. A previous study showed that L. reuteri could stimulate the body to produce anticancer cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-gamma to inhibit the migration and colonization of melanoma (44). In inflammation-associated colorectal cancer, the administration of decarboxylase-positive L. reuteri produced histamine, which decreased the number and size of colon tumors by reducing the amounts of proinflammatory cancer-associated cytokines and keratinocyte chemoattractants (45). In the present study, L. reuteri was proven to prevent liver tumor initiation through tryptophan metabolism, revealing its multiple potentials in tumor prevention.
Exploring the mechanisms of tumor initiation has significant clinical benefits for the early detection and intervention of cancer. Overall, we identified the role of tryptophan metabolites derived from the gut microbiota in regulating SREBP2 expression through AhR signaling in the liver, which is critical to preventing liver tumor initiation. Our study provides insights into the prevention of liver tumorigenesis and might contribute to the development of strategies for liver cancer prevention.
Materials and Methods
Mice and Tumor Models.
Male C57BL/6J mice and Balb/c nude mice were purchased from GemPharmatech, and mice aged 7 to 9 wk were used for the experiments. Ahr −/− mice with a C57BL/6 background were purchased from Shanghai Model Organisms Center Inc. The above mice were housed and bred in an SPF animal facility at the Experimental Animal Center of the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejing University, on a 12-h light–dark cycle. GF C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Cyagen Biosciences Inc. and maintained in GF isolators. Mouse primary liver tumors were induced by HTVi of oncogenes including PT3-EF1a-C-Myc and PT/Caggs-NRas-V12 (Ras/Myc), PT3-EF1a-c-Met and PT3-EF1a-N90-β-catenin (MET/CAT), or Pt3-EF1a-myrAKT-HA and PT3-EF1a-FLAG-YAP S127A (YAP/AKT) combined together with the sleeping beauty transposase, pCMV-SB11, which were obtained from Addgene (www.addgene.com), and these oncogene plasmids were also approved by the depositor Xin Chen (Xin.Chen@ucsf.edu) at the University of California, San Francisco. The plasmid of pT3-EF1a-N90-β-catenin was a gift from Dr. Bin Zhao (binzhao@zju.edu.cn) at Zhejiang University, School of Medicine. Plasmid DNAs were diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and injected at 0.1 mL/g body weight of mice through the tail vein in 7 to 8 s. In the experiments including GF mice, the mice were injected with Ras/Myc at 0.07 mL/g body weight through the tail vein in 7 to 8 s. The Hep1-6 cell line was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The KPC cell line, derived from spontaneous tumors in a KrasLSL-G12D; Trp53LSL-R172H; Pdx1-Cre mouse model, was a gift from Raghu Kalluri at the MD Anderson Cancer Center of Houston, Texas. 3 × 105 Hep1-6 tumor cells were administered by subcutaneous or tail vein injection, and 1 × 106 KPC tumor cells were administered by intrasplenic injection. The mice were monitored by abdominal palpation and killed when the abdomen was enlarged in some of the mice; at this time point, the mice did not present weakness, jaundice, or any other abnormal symptoms in physical and mental status. All experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University.
Drug and AAV Administration.
Antibiotic-treated mice received a cocktail of three antibiotics: vancomycin (500 mg/L; Sigma, catalog # V2002), ampicillin (1 g/L; Sigma, catalog # A9518), and neomycin (1 g/L; Sigma, catalog # N6386) in drinking water, which was replaced every other day to maintain sterility. To inhibit SREBP2, the mice were treated by oral gavage of betulin (2 mg/mouse; Sigma, catalog # B9757) or vehicle (PBS) once per day for 21 d. To activate AhR, the mice were injected intraperitoneally with Ficz (1 μg/mouse; Sigma, catalog # SML1489) or vehicle (0.4% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in PBS) once per day for 21 d. For Srebf2 knockdown in the liver, recombinant AAV8 vectors containing Srebf2-RNA interference or Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein (EGFP) with an ApoE/hAATp promoter (AAV8-Srebf2 KD, AAV8-EGFP) were generated by Genechem Co., Ltd. For Srebf2 overexpression in the liver, AAV8 vectors containing Srebf2 with a ApoE/hAATp promoter (AAV8-Srebf2 OE) or empty vector (AAV8-vector) were generated by Genechem Co., Ltd. AAV8-Srebf2 KD, AAV8-EGFP, AAV8-Srebf2 OE, or AAV8-vector was diluted in 200 μL of PBS (1 × 1011 v.g/mouse) and delivered via tail vein injection. Four weeks after AAV8 delivery, Srebf2 knockdown or overexpression was verified by qRT-PCR and Western blotting.
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation and L. Reuteri Administration.
Fresh stool samples from healthy C57BL/6J mice (8-wk-old, male) were mixed and suspended using PBS (200 mg/mL). The suspension was filtered through 70 μm strainers and then used for FMT. GF and control SPF mice received FMT or PBS by gavage (200 μL/mouse) every other day for 14 d and then HTVi was performed. For the supplementation of L. reuteri (ATCC 53608), L. reuteri was grown anaerobically in MRS medium at 37 °C for 16 h and reached a concentration of 107 CFU/mL bacteria liquid, which was calculated via the plate counting method. Then, the bacterial culture was centrifuged at 3,500 × g for 10 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended for gavage (109 CFU/mouse). The mice were pretreated with the ABX cocktail for 14 d to deplete the gut commensal bacteria. Then, ABX pretreated and control mice received L. reuteri bacteria or MRS by gavage (200 μL/mouse) once a day for 14 d, followed by HTVi.
Statistical Analysis.
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Inc.) and SPSS 19.0 (IBM Corp.). In all figures, the data were represented as the mean ± SEM. Comparisons between two independent groups or paired groups were performed using two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test or paired t test, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001), and “ns” indicates no significance. Survival curves were plotted using Kaplan–Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank test, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. Y21H030014), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81902409, 81830089, and 82188102), the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 2019YFC1316000 and 2020YFA0804300), the Zhejiang University K.P. Chao’s High Technology Development Foundation, and Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-level Innovative Health Talents.
Author contributions
W.C., L.W., and T.L. designed research; W.C., L.W., Y.B., Z.T., J.Zhao., X.Zhang., T.W., J.Zhang., T.M., Q.Z., X.Zhi., J.L., C.Z., L.N., and M.L. performed research; W.C., L.W., Z.T., and X.Zhang. analyzed data; Z.T. and X.Zhang. technical assistance; and W.C., L.W., and T.L. wrote the paper.
Competing interest
The authors declare no competing interest.
Footnotes
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. G.K. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
All study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix .
Supporting Information
References
- 1. Villanueva A., Hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 380 , 1450–1462 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hanahan D., Hallmarks of cancer: New dimensions. Cancer Discov. 12 , 31–46 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Yu L. X., Schwabe R. F., The gut microbiome and liver cancer: Mechanisms and clinical translation. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 14 , 527–539 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Dapito D. H., et al. , Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21 , 504–51 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ma C., et al. , Gut microbiome-mediated bile acid metabolism regulates liver cancer via NKT cells. Science 360 , 5931 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Loo T. M., et al. , Gut microbiota promotes obesity-associated liver cancer through PGE2-mediated suppression of antitumor immunity. Cancer Discov. 7 , 522–538 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Liu X., Chen Y., Zhang S., Dong L., Gut microbiota-mediated immunomodulation in tumor. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 40 , 221 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Rabot S., et al. , Germ-free C57BL/6J mice are resistant to high-fat-diet-induced insulin resistance and have altered cholesterol metabolism. FASEB J. 24 , 4948–4959 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Le Roy T., et al. , The intestinal microbiota regulates host cholesterol homeostasis. BMC Biol. 17 , 94 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Mullen P. J., Yu R., Longo J., Archer M. C., Penn L. Z., The interplay between cell signalling and the mevalonate pathway in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16 , 718–731 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Moon S. H., et al., p53 represses the mevalonate pathway to mediate tumor suppression. Cell 176 , 564580.e519 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Zhang X., et al. , Dietary cholesterol drives fatty liver-associated liver cancer by modulating gut microbiota and metabolites. Gut 70 , 761–774 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wen L., et al. , An efficient combination immunotherapy for primary liver cancer by harmonized activation of innate and adaptive immunity in mice. Hepatology 69 , 2518–2532 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Huang B., Song B. L., Xu C., Cholesterol metabolism in cancer: Mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Metab. 2 , 132–141 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Che L., et al. , Cholesterol biosynthesis supports the growth of hepatocarcinoma lesions depleted of fatty acid synthase in mice and humans. Gut 69 , 177–186 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Liang B., et al. , ASPP2 inhibits tumor growth by repressing the mevalonate pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 10 , 830 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Natividad J. M., et al. , Impaired aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand production by the gut microbiota is a key factor in metabolic syndrome. Cell Metab. 28 , 737–749.e734 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wikoff W. R., et al. , Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 , 3698–3703 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Muku G. E., et al. , Selective Ah receptor modulators attenuate NPC1L1-mediated cholesterol uptake through repression of SREBP-2 transcriptional activity. Lab. Invest. 100 , 250–264 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Tanos R., et al. , Aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulates the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway in a dioxin response element-independent manner. Hepatology 55 , 1994–2004 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Lamas B., et al. , CARD9 impacts colitis by altering gut microbiota metabolism of tryptophan into aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands. Nat. Med. 22 , 598–605 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Dong F., et al. , Intestinal microbiota-derived tryptophan metabolites are predictive of Ah receptor activity. Gut Microbes 12 , 1–24 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Sia D., Villanueva A., Friedman S. L., Llovet J. M., Liver cancer cell of origin, molecular class, and effects on patient prognosis. Gastroenterology 152 , 745–761 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Moreno-Gonzalez M., Beraza N., The role of the microbiome in liver cancer. Cancers (Basel) 13 , 2330 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Zhang H. L., et al. , Profound impact of gut homeostasis on chemically-induced pro-tumorigenic inflammation and hepatocarcinogenesis in rats. J. Hepatol. 57 , 803–812 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Yang Y., et al. , Cross-talk between the gut microbiota and monocyte-like macrophages mediates an inflammatory response to promote colitis-associated tumourigenesis. Gut 70 , 1495–1506 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Xu C., et al. , Antibiotics-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis promotes tumor initiation via affecting APC-Th1 development in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 488 , 418–424 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Caesar R., Nygren H., Oresic M., Backhed F., Interaction between dietary lipids and gut microbiota regulates hepatic cholesterol metabolism. J. Lipid. Res. 57 , 474–481 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Hong X., et al. , The lipogenic regulator SREBP2 induces transferrin in circulating melanoma cells and suppresses ferroptosis. Cancer Discov. 11 , 678–695 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Chen M., et al. , An aberrant SREBP-dependent lipogenic program promotes metastatic prostate cancer. Nat. Genet. 50 , 206–218 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Sharma B., et al. , Clinical relevance of cholesterol homeostasis genes in colorectal cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1864 , 1314–1327 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Platten M., Nollen E. A. A., Rohrig U. F., Fallarino F., Opitz C. A., Tryptophan metabolism as a common therapeutic target in cancer, neurodegeneration and beyond. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 18 , 379–401 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Theate I., et al. , Extensive profiling of the expression of the indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 protein in normal and tumoral human tissues. Cancer Immunol. Res. 3 , 161–172 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Wyatt M., Greathouse K. L., Targeting dietary and microbial tryptophan-indole metabolism as therapeutic approaches to colon cancer. Nutrients 13 , 1189 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Sun X. Z., et al. , Alteration of fecal tryptophan metabolism correlates with shifted microbiota and may be involved in pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 26 , 7173–7190 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Mourao L. R., et al. , Protective action of indole-3-acetic acid on induced hepatocarcinoma in mice. Cell Biochem. Funct. 27 , 16–22 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Fan Y., et al. , The aryl hydrocarbon receptor functions as a tumor suppressor of liver carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 70 , 212–220 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Hezaveh K., et al. , Tryptophan-derived microbial metabolites activate the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in tumor-associated macrophages to suppress anti-tumor immunity. Immunity 55 , 324–340.e328 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Ni J., et al. , Analysis of the relationship between the degree of dysbiosis in gut microbiota and prognosis at different stages of primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Front. Microbiol. 10 , 1458 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Williams B. B., et al. , Discovery and characterization of gut microbiota decarboxylases that can produce the neurotransmitter tryptamine. Cell Host Microbe 16 , 495–503 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Chen D., Wu J., Jin D., Wang B., Cao H., Fecal microbiota transplantation in cancer management: Current status and perspectives. Int. J. Cancer 145 , 2021–2031 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Baruch E. N., et al. , Fecal microbiota transplant promotes response in immunotherapy-refractory melanoma patients. Science 371 , 602–609 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Chen Y. H., Wu W. K., Wu M. S., Microbiota-associated therapy for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-induced liver cancer: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 , 5999 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Luo M., et al. , Preventive effect of Lactobacillus reuteri on melanoma. Biomed. Pharmacother. 126 , 109929 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Gao C., et al. , Gut microbe-mediated suppression of inflammation-associated colon carcinogenesis by luminal histamine production. Am. J. Pathol. 187 , 2323–2336 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix .