Abstract
Treatment of large vestibular schwannoma (VS) has historically centered on total resection of the lesion. Staged surgery has been used for VS that is highly vascularized, unexpected events during surgery, and thinned and stretched facial nerve with serious adherence causing difficult dissection. We present a case of a patient with a large VS resected through a two-stage surgery through the same retrosigmoid craniotomy.
Keywords: cerebellopontine angle tumour, acoustic neuroma, vestibular schwannoma, staged surgery, retrosigmoid approach
Introduction
Treatment of large vestibular schwannoma (VS) has historically centered on total resection of the lesion. This approach has been linked to a significant rate of functional impairment of the facial and cochlear nerves [1-3]. There is no established agreement for small- and medium-sized lesions; however, surgery remains the best choice for large lesions [4]. We present a case of a patient with a large VS resected through a two-stage surgery achieving total resection with an acceptable facial nerve function outcome.
Case presentation
A 27-year-old woman was getting ready to get married in 2017. She set the wedding date and sent out invitations to everyone. A month before the date of the celebration, she tried on the dress and the special heel but was unable to stand and walk properly due to the intense feeling of imbalance and instability. Neurological examination showed left ear hearing loss and cerebellar ataxia. The MRI revealed a large left vestibular schwannoma (VS), grade T4b (Hannover classification), with severe compression of the brainstem (Figure 1). There was a long conversation and discussion about the possible treatments, and she opted for surgical treatment in hopes of improving symptoms. However, she did not accept the result of facial paralysis, mainly because it was going to stay forever in the photos of the wedding party with her face paralyzed. Therefore, we proposed a partial removal through a retrosigmoid approach in an attempt to save the facial nerve function and to improve the imbalance and instability, and a second stage some months after the wedding celebration for complete removal, perhaps with the risks of facial nerve palsy. At that time, she accepted the surgery in two stages, and thus, everything was done based on this free consent waiver contract.
Description of the technique
The patient was placed in a lateral decubitus position (Figure 2). Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring was applied with somatosensory and motor-evoked potentials, auditory-evoked potentials, and direct facial nerve stimulation.
A curved skin incision was placed two fingers behind the ear (Figure 3). The subcutaneous and muscle planes were incised in line with the skin incision. A burr-hole was placed in the asterion, and a retrosigmoid craniotomy was carried out (Figure 4). The mastoid air cells were closed with bone wax to prevent CSF fistula. Dura was opened, in a semicircular fashion, with its base dressing the sigmoid sinus.
Cerebrospinal fluid was drained through the cerebellomedullary cistern for cerebellar relaxation. The cerebellum was gently retracted with a spatula to expose the CPA. The tumor capsule was opened, and the tumor was removed with an ultrasonic aspirator. The arachnoid plane was kept intact to protect the neurovascular structures. The posterior lip of the internal auditory was drilled, and the tumor could be removed meticulously using a micro dissector and microhooks. In the first surgery, the tumor was removed partially. Resection was stopped as soon as the facial motor evoked potential began to decrease. The dura was sutured in a watertight fashion. The bone flap was fixed with titanium mini plates and screws. The wound was closed in a watertight fashion. The patient improved her symptoms of imbalance and instability without facial nerve palsy, House-Brackmann (HB) grade I, and was able to get married. Postoperative MRI showed subtotal resection (Figure 5).
The second stage was performed six months later using the same retrosigmoid approach. The scar was extensively released to provide adequate exposure to the residual tumor. The facial nerve was thinned and spread out over the capsule (Figures 6, 7). A total resection was achieved (Figure 8). Postoperative MRI showed total resection (Figure 9). The patient had a facial nerve palsy HB grade IV after the second surgery, which improved at the follow-up to HB grade II (Figure 10). Hearing status decreased after surgery.
Discussion
Treatment of large vestibular schwannoma (VS) has historically centered on total resection of the lesion. This approach has been linked to a significant rate of functional impairment of the facial and cochlear nerves [1-3]. There is no established agreement for small and medium-sized lesions; however, surgery remains the best choice for large lesions [4].
During the past decades, the focus has been progressively changing from total to subtotal resection to preserve the facial nerve function and patients’ quality of life [5,6]. However, Nakatomi et al. have shown that tumor recurrence was predicted by the degree of resection, with subtotal resection having almost 11-fold greater risk compared with gross total resection [7]. Therefore, subtotal resection carries the risk of long-term recurrence.
Staged resection for large VS has been indicated as an option to optimize facial nerve outcomes and reduce complications [8,9]. Two-stage surgery using translabyrinthine-translabyrinthine, retrosigmoid-translabyrinthine, and retrosigmoid-retrosigmoid approaches have been reported to address these lesions [8-12]. The stage surgery may be used for the following situations: highly vascularized VS with severe brainstem compression, unexpected events during surgery like as cerebellar swelling or vital sign changes, thinned and stretched facial nerve with serious adherence causing difficult dissection, decreased facial nerve potential, and the existence of brainstem/cerebellum edema, are the main reasons for staged resection [8-11,13,14].
Conclusions
Staged resection for large VS has been considered an exception to optimize facial nerve outcomes and reduce complications. Although there remain no absolute indications, it may be considered an option for selected cases.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study
References
- 1.Resection of large vestibular schwannomas: facial nerve preservation in the context of surgical approach and patient-assessed outcome. Anderson DE, Leonetti J, Wind JJ, Cribari D, Fahey K. J Neurosurg. 2005;102:643–649. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.4.0643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Current surgical results of retrosigmoid approach in extralarge vestibular schwannomas. Jung S, Kang S-S, Kim T-S, et al. Surg Neurol. 2000;53:370–378. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(00)00196-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): surgical management and results with an emphasis on complications and how to avoid them. Samii M, Matthies C. Neurosurgery. 1997;40:11–3. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199701000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Role of electrophysiology in guiding near-total resection for preservation of facial nerve function in the surgical treatment of large vestibular schwannomas. Bernardeschi D, Pyatigorskaya N, Vanier A, et al. J Neurosurg. 2018;128:903–910. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Evaluation of the increased use of partial resection of large vestibular schwanommas: facial nerve outcomes and recurrence/regrowth rates. Schwartz MS, Kari E, Strickland BM, Berliner K, Brackmann DE, House JW, Friedman RA. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34:1456–1464. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182976552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Systematic review and meta-analysis of the technique of subtotal resection and stereotactic radiosurgery for large vestibular schwannomas: a "nerve-centered" approach. Starnoni D, Daniel RT, Tuleasca C, George M, Levivier M, Messerer M. Neurosurg Focus. 2018;44:0. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.FOCUS17669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Long-term risk of recurrence and regrowth after gross-total and subtotal resection of sporadic vestibular schwannoma. Nakatomi H, Jacob JT, Carlson ML, et al. J Neurosurg. 2017:1–7. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS16498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Staged resection of large acoustic neuromas. Patni AH, Kartush JM. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;132:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Staged removal of acoustic tumors: techniques and lessons learned from a series of 83 patients. Comey CH, Jannetta PJ, Sheptak PE, Joh HD, Burkhart LE. Neurosurgery. 1995;37:915–920. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199511000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Staged resection of large vestibular schwannomas. Raslan AM, Liu JK, McMenomey SO, Delashaw JB Jr. J Neurosurg. 2012;116:1126–1133. doi: 10.3171/2012.1.JNS111402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Staged resection of large hypervascular vestibular schwannomas in young adults. Abe T, Izumiyama H, Imaizumi Y, et al. Skull Base. 2001;11:199–206. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-16608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Staging in giant vestibular schwannoma surgery: A two consecutive day technique for complete resection in basic neurosurgical setups. Bandlish D, Biswas N, Deb S. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2014;5:225–230. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.133560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.The two-stage excision of huge acoustic neurinomas. Sheptak PE, Jannetta PJ. J Neurosurg. 1979;51:37–41. doi: 10.3171/jns.1979.51.1.0037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Removal of large acoustic neurinomas (vestibular schwannomas) by the retrosigmoid approach with no mortality and minimal morbidity. Yamakami I, Uchino Y, Kobayashi E, Yamaura A, Oka N. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75:453–458. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.010827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]