Abstract
Objective: To explore the relationship between galectin-1, -3 and unexplained infertility and the effect on endometrial receptivity. Methods: The clinical data of 100 female patients at childbearing age coming to Xingtai People’s Hospital from February 2019 to February 2021 were collected retrospectively. Based on normal pregnancy or not, 50 infertility patients were placed into an infertility group, and 50 patients with normal pregnancy history were placed into a normal group. The mRNA and protein levels of galectin-1, -3, endometrial wave-like activity, endometrial thickness, uterine artery pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), end diastolic velocity (EDV) and peak systolic velocity (PSV) ratio (S/D = PSV/EDV) were compared between the two groups of patients. Results: The mRNA and protein levels of galectin-1, -3 in the infertile group were lower than those in the normal group (P<0.05). In addition, the endometrial wave-like activity in the infertile group was more than that in the normal group (P<0.05). The endometrial thickness was less, while PI, RI and S/D were higher in the infertile group than those in the normal group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The low mRNA and protein expressions of galectin-1, -3 in unexplained infertility can affect endometrial receptivity, which may be closely related to unexplained infertility.
Keywords: Galectin-1, -3, unexplained infertility, endometrial receptivity
Introduction
Unexplained infertility refers to infertility that has not been found with a clear cause after detailed examination of infertility, and it accounts for about 10% of the total infertility in the population [1]. The poor receptivity of the endometrium during the implantation window for fertilized eggs may be one of the main causes of unexplained infertility [2]. A large amount of evidence has proven that the occurrence of infertility and spontaneous abortion is closely related to the low endometrial receptivity [3]. The introduction of assisted reproductive technology has provided greater possibilities for the treatment of infertility, but at present, its success rate is only 20%-35%, mainly because the formation of endometrial receptivity is defective or delayed [4]. Therefore, understanding endometrial receptivity is of great importance for the evaluation of infertility.
Endometrial receptivity mainly refers to the functional and morphological changes of the endometrium, which provides a comfortable and suitable intrauterine environment for embryo implantation [5]. Endometrial receptivity is the ability to accept embryos in every menstrual cycle, but it is regulated and restricted by many factors [6]. This period is clinically called the implantation window, mainly 6-10 days after ovulation. Clinically, it is used to evaluate endometrial receptivity, and the commonly used method is B-ultrasound [7]. Generally, when the endometrium of a patient during ovulation is over 8 cm, it means that the endometrial receptivity is good, indicating that the endometrium has three-line signs and is suitable for embryo implantation [8]. When the endometrial blood flow index PI detected by B-ultrasound is less than 2, it indicates that the endometrial receptivity is poor. In addition to B-ultrasound detection, the endocytosis of the patient’s endometrium can be observed clinically by electron microscopy, which can also effectively detect the receptivity of the endometrium [9]. The establishment mechanism of endometrial receptivity is very complex, and many factors participate in the regulation. These factors include estrogen and progesterone secreted by ovaries, embryogenic factors secreted by embryos and endometrium, local molecules of endometrium, etc. [10]. Hormones secreted by ovaries are macro-control factors for the formation of endometrial receptivity, and embryos and the endometrium periodically express receptivity related molecules, thus promoting the establishment of receptivity [11].
Lectins are a class of proteins that can selectively recognize and non-covalently bind to sugar structures β-Galactoside, and the oligosaccharide structure recognized by galactoside exists in most glycoproteins [12]. S-type coagulant, namely galectin, is widely distributed in many tissues and cells. It plays a biological role through the classical receptor ligand action mode in pathological and physiological aspects [13]. A lot of evidence has shown that glycosidic bonds play an important role in the formation of mammalian embryos. Galectin-1, -3 has received increasing attention in the field of reproduction [14].
Unexplained infertility is when the cause of infertility cannot be clearly identified by current examination methods, and the obstacle of fertilized egg implantation may be one of the main reasons, which may be related to endometrial receptivity during the window of fertilized egg implantation [15]. Endometrial receptivity is closely related to embryogenic factors and progesterone secreted by embryos. Galectin is widely distributed in cells and tissues and participates in immune regulation, apoptosis, cell adhesion and other processes. Some studies have found that galectin participates in the whole process of fertilization and embryo formation [16]. The purpose of this paper is to study the relationship between galectin-1, -3 and unexplained infertility, and the effect on decreasing endometrial receptivity in infertile patients. The innovation of this study is to prove that the mRNA and protein expressions of galactin-1, -3 are closely related to unexplained infertility, and the expression of galactin-1, -3 is related to endometrial receptivity, which could provide a basis for the evaluation of unexplained infertility.
Materials and methods
The general data
The clinical data of 100 female patients at childbearing age coming to Xingtai People’s Hospital from February 2019 to February 2021 were collected retrospectively. Based on normal pregnancy or not, 50 infertility patients were placed into an infertility group, and 50 patients with normal pregnancy history were placed into a normal group. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xingtai People’s Hospital.
All the patients in the infertility group met the following criteria: (1) Women of childbearing age (aged 20-40 years); (2) Women who had normal sexual life after marriage without contraception; (3) Women who had been cohabiting for two years without pregnancy; (4) Women with regular menstrual cycle, normal biphasic temperature pattern, normal hormone levels, normal size of uterus and unobstructed fallopian tubes on both sides; (5) Women whose male partner had a normal semen examination result; (6) Women who were diagnosed with female unexplained infertility via exclusion of anatomy, infection and other factors.
All the patients in the normal group met the following criteria: (1) Women of childbearing age: aged 20-40 years; (2) Women who had a history of one or more normal pregnancies; (3) Women who had regular menstrual cycles; (4) Women without endocrine, immune or metabolic diseases, and didn’t receive hormone treatment within 3 months.
Exclusion criteria of the two groups: (1) Those with organic diseases of uterus or ovary; (2) Those with blocked fallopian tubes; (3) Those with incomplete data records.
Endometrial sampling
Before endometrial sampling, informed consent was obtained from the patients. The B-ultrasound monitoring was carried out around the tenth day of the menstrual cycle to observe the endometrium and follicles in the body. One week after ovulation, the patient underwent B-ultrasound again to monitor the thickness of the endometrium. Before taking the endometrium, the patient’s vagina was rinsed with 0.9% sodium chloride solution, which does not dilate the cervix. After washing, a 3 mm small spatula was used to scratch the uterus to collect the endometrial tissue in a gentle and slow way to avoid damage. If the tissue collection caused any bleeding, it is necessary to rinse the endometrium gently with 0.9% sodium chloride solution, and then the tissue was put into 10% formaldehyde solution for fixation. The fixation time was less than 24 hours, and then the tissue was paraffin embedded.
Measuring mRNA and protein levels of galectin-1, -3
Experimental methods
The mRNA levels of galectin-1, -3 were measured by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR): (1) Extraction of galectin-1, -3 RNA; (2) Galectin-1, -3 RNA quality detection; (3) Synthesis of galectin-1, -3 cDNA; (4) A housekeeping gene in a gradient diluted standard and sample was tested (β-action) by real time quantitative PCR; (5) Preparation of DNA a template for plotting gradient dilution standard curve; (6) Real time quantitative PCR of galectin-1, -3 RNA.
The protein levels of galectin-1, -3 were measured by immunohistochemistry: (1) Slide washing; (2) Embedding organization; (3) Section; (4) Salvage organization; (5) Dewaxing; (6) Antigen repair; (7) Serologic blockade; (8) Add mouse anti human galectin-3 monoclonal antibody (Brand: LSBio; Article No.: LS-C62616); (9) Culture with mouse anti human vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF/VPF) monoclonal antibody; (10) Culture with horseradish peroxidase labeled streptomycin ovalbumin working solution (Brand: Yaji Biology; Article No.: IH-2037R); (11) Culture with developer; (12) Re-dyeing; (13) Dehydration; (14) Cover.
Result evaluation
Negative control: the PBS solution was used as the negative control.
Positive results: all sections were read and recorded by pathologists in a double blind manner. Item A: Positive cell staining intensity was scored as follows, colorless: 0 point, light yellow: 1 point, yellow-brown: 2 points, brown: 3 points. Item B: The proportion of positive cells was scored as follows: negative = 0 points; positive cells ≤10% = 1 point; positive cells 11%-50% = 2 points; positive cells 51%-75% = 3 points; positive cells ≥75% = 4 points. Score of each case = multiplication of two scores (A × B). A score ≥3 points indicated positive immune reaction.
Ultrasonic examination
The color Doppler ultrasound diagnostic instrument (Mindray resona8) was used to measure the size of uterine body and the thickness of endometrium, and evaluate in detail the wave-like activity and types of the endometrium, including positive motion, negative motion, opposite motion, irregular motion and no motion.
Observation indexes
1. Clinical data; 2. The mRNA levels of galectin-1, -3; 3. The protein levels of galectin-1, -3; 4. The endometrial wave-like activity; 5. Parameters from transvaginal ultrasound; (1) Endometrial thickness; (2) Uterine artery pulsatility index (PI); (3) Resistance index (RI); (4) End diastolic velocity (EDV) and peak systolic velocity (PSV) ratio (S/D = PSV/EDV).
Statistical analysis
SPSS 26.0 was applied to process the data. The counting data were shown as percentage and compared using χ2 test. The measurement data were shown by mean ± SD, and compared by t-test. The difference was significant if P<0.05.
Results
Baseline characteristics
There was no obvious difference in the age and body mass index between the two groups, indicating group comparability (P>0.05). In addition, the average infertile time in the infertility group was (6.64±2.90) years (Table 1).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics
| Index | Infertility group (n = 50) | Normal group (n = 50) | t | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years old) | 31.52±3.44 | 31.88±3.35 | -0.53 | 0.597 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.94±1.06 | 20.96±1.10 | -0.069 | 0.945 |
| Infertile time (years) | 6.64±2.90 | - | - | - |
Note: Body mass index (BMI).
The mRNA levels of galectin-1, -3 in the infertility and normal groups
The mRNA levels of galectin-1, -3 in the infertility group were lower than those in the normal group (P<0.05) (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

The mRNA levels of galectin-1 and galectin-3 in the infertility and normal groups. A, C: Galectin-1 mRNA; B, D: Galectin-3 mRNA.
The protein levels of galectin-1, -3 in the infertility and normal groups
The protein levels of galectin-1, -3 in the infertility group were lower than those in the normal group (P<0.05) (Figure 2).
Figure 2.

The protein levels of galectin-1 and galectin-3 in the infertility and normal groups. A: Galectin-1 protein; B: Galectin-3 protein; C: Galectin-1 protein in the infertility group; D: Galectin-1 protein in the normal group; E: Galectin-3 protein in the infertility group; F: Galectin-3 protein in the normal group; Scale bar, 10 μm.
Endometrial wave-like activity
The endometrial wave-like activity in the two groups was observed and compared. The activity in the infertility group was more than that in the normal group (P<0.05). See Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Endometrial wave-like activity.
Parameters detected by transvaginal ultrasound
As shown in Figures 4 and 5, the changes of parameters detected by transvaginal ultrasound in the two groups were observed and compared. The endometrial thickness in the infertility group was less than that in the normal group, and the PI, RI and S/D were higher in the infertility group than those in the normal group (P<0.05).
Figure 4.

Parameters detected by transvaginal ultrasound. A: Endometrial thickness; B: Uterine artery PI; C: RI; D: S/D. Note: PI, pulsatility index; RI, resistance index; EDV, end diastolic velocity; PSV, peak systolic velocity; S/D = PSV/EDV.
Figure 5.
Transvaginal ultrasound of infertile group. A: Endometrial thickness; B: Uterine artery PI, RI and S/D. Note: PI, pulsatility index; RI, resistance index; EDV, end diastolic velocity; PSV, peak systolic velocity; S/D = PSV/EDV.
Discussion
Spontaneous abortion is a common and frequently occurring disease among women of gestational age. The rate of spontaneous abortion accounts for 10-15% of all pregnancies, and over 80% are early abortions [17]. Current research has shown that genetic factors, endocrine factors, infection factors are inducing factors of spontaneous abortion [18]. In addition, some causes are unknown. A study showed that the expression of galectin-1 protein in the embryo group of early abortion was lower than that of normal pregnancy, and the mice with galectin-1 gene deletion had a higher abortion rate than normal mice [19,20], showing that galectin-1, -3 were closely related to unexplained early abortion.
Our results showed that the mRNA and protein levels of galactin-1, -3 in the infertility group were low. The high expression of galectin-1, -3 in gestational trophoblast indicates that galectin participates in the invasion and infiltration of blastocyst trophoblast into endometrium [21]. β-Galactoside is the main component of extracellular matrix. The combination of Galactosyl-3 and β-Galactoside can smoothly invade the endometrial stroma and blood vessels, so that the fertilized egg can be successfully implanted [22]. This explains why low expression of galactin-1, -3 may lead to infertility.
In addition, the endometrial wave-like activity in the infertility group was higher than that in the normal group. The endometrial thickness, PI, RI and S/D showed a poor presence in the infertility group. These results suggest that galectin-1, -3 may cause infertility by reducing endometrial receptivity. In patients with infertility, hormones lack periodic changes, while uterine blood flow and uterine function change due to the influence of ovarian hormone level. They are synergistic. RI value may be related to blood viscosity, friction between blood cells, increased friction between blood vessel walls, and vascular status [23]. Therefore, uterine hemodynamics were in disorder, and RI of uterine spiral artery and S/D were significantly increased, presenting low amplitude discontinuous waves, affecting normal blood supply, which is not conducive to implantation [24].
In this study, we explored the relationship between galectin-1, -3 and unexplained infertility and the effect on endometrial receptivity. The low mRNA and protein levels of galectin-1, -3 in unexplained infertility can affect endometrial receptivity, which may be closely related to unexplained infertility and provide basis for the diagnosis and treatment of unexplained infertility. However, there are some limitations in this study. Firstly, the sample size in this study is small. Secondly, the current physical and mental status of the research subject may affect the authenticity and accuracy of the past data reports, since our research is a retrospective analysis. It is necessary to design a prospective clinical trial and expand the scope of the study population, including the number of subjects and their areas, to evaluate the related indexes and explore the mechanism.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Xingtai Science and Technology Project (2019ZC305).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Aramesh S, Azizi Kutenaee M, Najafi F, Ghaffari P, Taghavi SA. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) did not affect the fertility outcomes in women with unexplained infertility after intrauterine insemination: a randomised clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;42:2480–2485. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2080534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stevens Brentjens L, Habets D, Den Hartog J, Al-Nasiry S, Wieten L, Morré S, Van Montfoort A, Romano A, van Golde R. Endometrial factors in the implantation failure spectrum: protocol of a multidisciplinary observational cohort study in women with repeated implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage (MURIM Study) BMJ Open. 2022;12:e056714. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bui BN, Torrance HL, Janssen C, Cohlen B, de Bruin JP, den Hartog JE, van der Linden PJQ, Deurloo KL, Maas JWM, van Oppenraaij R, Cantineau A, Lambalk CB, Visser H, Brinkhuis E, van Disseldorp J, Schoot BC, Lardenoije C, van Wely M, Eijkemans MJC, Broekmans FJM. Does endometrial scratching increase the rate of spontaneous conception in couples with unexplained infertility and a good prognosis (hunault > 30%)? Study protocol of the SCRaTCH-OFO trial: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:511. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2160-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cozzolino M, Diáz-Gimeno P, Pellicer A, Garrido N. Use of the endometrial receptivity array to guide personalized embryo transfer after a failed transfer attempt was associated with a lower cumulative and per transfer live birth rate during donor and autologous cycles. Fertil Steril. 2022;118:724–736. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Qi Y, Wang X, Hou S, Wu Z, Xu X, Pang C. Intracavitary physiotherapy combined with acupuncture mediated AMPK/mTOR signalling to improve endometrial receptivity in patients with thin endometrium. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;277:32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liu Y, Yao Y, Sun H, Zhao J, Li H, Wang S, Zhang T, Meng M, Zhou S. Lipid metabolism-related genes as biomarkers and therapeutic targets reveal endometrial receptivity and immune microenvironment in women with reproductive dysfunction. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39:2179–2190. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02584-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Su WW, Gao XA, Gao ZY, Pan JL, Deng F, He WT. Clinical observation on the therapeutic effect of warm acupuncture on endometrial cavity fluid from in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2019;39:923–926. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2019.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Aghajanpour S, Hosseini E, Amirchaghmaghi E, Zandieh Z, Amjadi F, Yahyaei A, Zolfaghari Z, Aflatoonian K, Ashrafi M, Aflatoonian R. Differential expression of innate/adaptive immunity genes induced by endometrial scratching as a hopeful approach for implantation boosting in unexplained, repeated implantation failure: an RCT. J Reprod Immunol. 2021;148:103426. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2021.103426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jia Y, Sha Y, Qiu Z, Guo Y, Tan A, Huang Y, Zhong Y, Dong Y, Ye H. Comparison of the effectiveness of endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) to guide personalized embryo transfer with conventional frozen embryo transfer in 281 Chinese women with recurrent implantation failure. Med Sci Monit. 2022;28:e935634. doi: 10.12659/MSM.935634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fraser R, Smith R, Lin CJ. A 3D endometrial organotypic model simulating the acute inflammatory decidualisation initiation phase with epithelial induction of the key endometrial receptivity marker, integrin αVβ3. Hum Reprod Open. 2021;2021:hoab034. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoab034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sadek S, Matitashvili T, Kovac A, Ramadan H, Stadtmauer L. Assessment of uterine receptivity by endometrial and sub-endometrial blood flow using SlowflowHD in hormone prepared frozen embryo transfer cycles: a pilot study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39:1069–1079. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02454-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lachowicz-Wiśniewska S, Pratap-Singh A, Kapusta I, Kruszyńska A, Rapak A, Ochmian I, Cebulak T, Żukiewicz-Sobczak W, Rubiński P. Flowers and leaves extracts of stachys palustris L. exhibit stronger anti-proliferative, antioxidant, anti-diabetic, and anti-obesity potencies than stems and roots due to more phenolic compounds as revealed by UPLC-PDA-ESI-TQD-MS/MS. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022;15:785. doi: 10.3390/ph15070785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen X, Wang L, Yu X, Wang S, Zhang J. Caveolin-1 facilitates cell migration by upregulating nuclear receptor 4A2/retinoid X receptor α-mediated β-galactoside α2,6-sialyltransferase I expression in human hepatocarcinoma cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2021;137:106027. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2021.106027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wiater J, Samiec M, Skrzyszowska M, Lipiński D. Trichostatin a-assisted epigenomic modulation affects the expression profiles of not only recombinant human α1, 2-fucosyltransferase and α-galactosidase a enzymes but also Gal α1→3Gal epitopes in porcine bi-transgenic adult cutaneous fibroblast cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:1386. doi: 10.3390/ijms22031386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen M, He Y, Zhang P, Geng Q, Liu Q, Kong L, Chen Y, Wei Q, Liu J, Guo S, Liu H. Comparison of uterine receptivity between fertile and unexplained infertile women by assessment of endometrial and subendometrial perfusion using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: which index is better--peak intensity or area under the curve? Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42:654–663. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hutter S, Morales-Prieto DM, Andergassen U, Tschakert L, Kuhn C, Hofmann S, Markert UR, Jeschke U. Gal-1 silenced trophoblast tumor cells (BeWo) show decreased syncytium formation and different miRNA production compared to non-target silenced BeWo cells. Cell Adh Migr. 2016;10:28–38. doi: 10.1080/19336918.2015.1089377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chang Z, Kuang HX, Zhou X, Zhu H, Zhang Y, Fu Y, Fu Q, Jiang B, Wang W, Jiang S, Ren L, Ma L, Pan X, Feng XL. Temporal changes in cyclinD-CDK4/CDK6 and cyclinE-CDK2 pathways: implications for the mechanism of deficient decidualization in an immune-based mouse model of unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion. Mol Med. 2022;28:100. doi: 10.1186/s10020-022-00523-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang Z, Yan J, Chen H, He L, Xu S. The reproductive endocrine feature and conception outcome of women with unknown etiological menstrual cycle (36-45 days) with long follicular phase. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2022;38:742–747. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2022.2101636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wilsher S, Newcombe JR, Allen WRT. The immunolocalization of galectin-1 and progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF) in equine trophoblast: possible roles in trophoblast invasion and the immunological protection of pregnancy. Placenta. 2019;85:32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2019.08.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kaya B, Turhan U, Sezer S, Kaya S, Dağ İ, Tayyar A. Maternal serum galectin-1 and galectin-3 levels in pregnancies complicated with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33:861–868. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1637409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chaney HL, Grose LF, LaBarbara JM, Sirk AW, Blancke AM, Sánchez JM, Passaro C, Lonergan P, Mathew DJ. Galectin-1 induces gene and protein expression related to maternal-conceptus immune tolerance in bovine endometrium†. Biol Reprod. 2022;106:487–502. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioab215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hisrich BV, Young RB, Sansone AM, Bowens Z, Green LJ, Lessey BA, Blenda AV. Role of human galectins in inflammation and cancers associated with endometriosis. Biomolecules. 2020;10:230. doi: 10.3390/biom10020230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang L, Yao S, Huang F, Lv H, Liu D, Gao T, Wang B, Zhou Z, Cao C, Zhu Q, Weng Q, Zhao G, Hu Y. The UC-MSCbFGF/scaffold system accelerates the healing of the uterine full-thickness injury. Tissue Eng Part A. 2022;10:1089. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2022.0153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hendriks E, Rosenberg R, Prine L. Ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2020;101:599–606. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

